Some years back, I got roped into a solo assignment in Albany, NY. Driving around in boredom one weekend, I recognized two amazing and highly distinctive warbirds parked at the airport: a Boeing B-17 and a Heinkel He-111. They were there as part of a tour on their way to a major airshow elsewhere, and were open to the public (static display only, no flights). The Heinkel was actually built in Spain in 1946 (possibly ''47, I'm no longer sure) but had been "tweaked" to match the general specs of its earlier Luftwaffe brethren. The view through the front greenhouse was amazing, and even though it was just as spartan/utilitarian inside as the B-17 parked nearby, it somehow felt more "futuristic" due to its streamlining. I have just a few photos (this was pre-digital cameras & smartphones) but clearly remember what the 111 looked like inside. Quite an engineering feat.
The Spanish Heinkel was probably fitted with Merlin engines as the original was not available. The ones in Battle of Britain film used Merlins That would have not had the same sound of the originals which had a distinctive sound which was unsettling .
Most He111 left are actually Spanish copies built under license. With British engines. Watch the movies Patton and the Battle of Britain. Both 1969 movies. The aircraft are flown in both
A member of my family saw He111s coming up BelfastLough during the Blitz on Belfast . She was a schoolgirl at the time. She told me she could see the pilots they were so low.The drone of their engines was unmistakable .
My mother grew up in South Wales and said the same thing about the sound. In the '90s we lived near an airport and she said the sound of twin engine aircraft flying over still bothered her.
Belfast was heavily bombed in WW11, the Dublin City Council sent the Dublin Fire Belgrade to Belfast to fight the fires resulting from the continuing bombing.
I noticed that too. I thought maybe I misheard it. I hope this is not an AI narrator. I've been watching this channel quite a while and that's the first time so hopefully not.
Yeah, that got me to stop and rewind several times. However, considering the crap we have to endure from other channels, I suppose we can forgive an occasional gaffe on this great channel. If this is the worst mistake this otherwise outstanding narrator makes, a pass is definitely in older!
Another example of a yank putting their spin on the history of WW2 they sat on their hands and let the British and her allies fight. If the Japs hadn't kicked them in the crutch they would have sat back and sold arms and let the rest of the allies die
Personally, I would prefer it if 90% of the adjectives were deleted. Another point is the bomb load. 75 ×100lb bombs externally? I doubt it. Bombs, torpedoes, and V1 flying bombs were carried externally, though. Otherwise, it's quite interesting.
Indeed , the Heinkel - 111 was the Luftwaffe's MAJOR workhorse throughout that conflict . In My opinion one of the Prettiest , Large Aircraft , ever built too . Like the Mosquito , it just " Looks Right " .
It's HI nkel not Henkel! Plus in minute 2 you're showing a Spitfire production line. Plus some flying shots are of a Messerschmidt ME110. And an Italian SM79 bomber. And a 4 engined Condor. Oh dear.
@@wilkybarkid Not alone in using unrelated footage, this channel. By the way I’ve always been puzzled by this footage of Dunkirk @ 9:31 -> Looks like from a movie made in Hollywood during the war, perhaps by 20th Century Fox. The scenes of the troops under bombing look very realistic. Some others show British troops piling up in rowing boats in panic. I’ve seen extracts of this movie featured in various documentaries, but surely it’s not authentic footage. Can you please tell me ? Thank you.
What a flash! I do remember that He 111 at the RAF Museum, still treasue some photos of her. Just loved the history, the preservation and care in the museum, when visiting London in the summer during the 1990s (93, 94 and 96). Back then, when the UK, was still worth it… Cheers
It's also "Loo-twaffuh", not "loof-waffuh". I'm no teacher, but I'm a student of language and linguistics, and I've heard it pronounced by actual Germans.
“The tail section featured a single vertical stabiliser and horizontal stabiliser, enhancing the distinctive appearance of Heinkel’s bomber” This isn’t a school assignment with a minimum word count 😂
The Heinkel was a good-looking, well-streamlined plane for a military aircraft: the single fin-and-rudder feature made it better-looking than most of its contemporaries which had twin fins and rudders that aided the positioning of rotary gun turrets, the absence of which was one of the Heinkel's defensive shortcomings.
So much colourful dialogue with so many mistakes, and nearly a 50% level of irrelevant footage. I'd always hoped that this channel would eventually get it's act (and facts) together, but here we are some four years later, and no improvement. Such a shame.
You have got to start Googling something before typing... the Island was named after the town in Spain. Remember, the Spanish were in control of large parts of the Pacific at one point.
@@robert-trading-as-Bob69 I doubt that the German Condor legion were attacking islands in the pacific. Logic would dictate otherwise. Google is entirely unnecessary in this case. 🙄
Thank you do much for this excellent channal and all your hard work. I would appriciate if you can avoid the background music after the first minute intro. It is disturbing to listen the important and interesting information you bring out. Again, well done!
I'm guilty also by posting this, but, People commenting about his "errors" are doing exactly what he wants....there are no " "errors" in his videos...everything is deliberate to get more views and comments. Even a negative comment is $$$ for him. I usually just listen anymore and don't really pay attention to what (usually unrelated) flashs up on the screen because he's been operating like this on most of his channels for years.
The narrative is usually there or thereabouts, the video sometimes varies to eye candy land. Like you, I mostly listen to it as a podcast than watch it.
3:44 old mate needs to learn the difference between an He111 and Bf110 and 5:19 an Fw Condor and 8:15 an Italian Savoia-Marchetti bomber and 9:03 a Ju88 and 11:01 Ju52. Interesting to hear the history of the He111 in the UK, I saw it and have photos from when I was there in 1983.
Don't know if it still is there but I saw an He-111 flying around Dallas,Tx about 30 years ago. Very cool aircraft. I noticed it when setting in my KW900L at the terminal one day.
I can't imagine the relief of being on the ground, hopeless. Then you hear that familiar sound above and realize your brothers and sisters in the air got your back.
Why. all of a sudden, are you mispronouncing the name Heinkel? HENkel is an chemicals and consumer products company, and is completely unrelated to the aircraft manufacturer, HEINkel. What surprises me is that you have pronounced it properly in previous videos, so why now...? Also there is only one Royal Navy - no need to say "the British Royal Navy".
The Royal Netherlands Navy, Royal Australian Navy, Royal Canadian Navy, and Royal New Zealand Navy all fought in World War II. Edit: I see what you meant. Royal Navy almost always means the UK one. But, I think the Aussies, Kiwis, Canucks, and Dutch deserve credit, too!
@@natquesenberry6368The Royal Navy IS the one and only British navy. The others you mention are indeed 'Royal', if only due to the fact that all, except the Royal Netherlands Navy, are former British colonies, but they are referred to exactly as you mention - they are not THE Royal Navy. Oh, and the same goes for the Royal Air Force too. 😁
I generally appreciate your videos. The title of this one is more glib than factual: the "U.S." did not "refuse" to destroy this Heinkel H-20 Aircraft.
The clickbait picture is showing a Casa 2.111, not a Heinkel... And while you are talking about the He111 I see Bf110, Fw200, SM79, Do217 and/or Ju88 cockpit, Ju290 cockpit, and more... Again you succeeded in a sloppy post, mate! Its not just about the story, the visuals have to match there. If not, what can we believe is really true then???
Sometimes I think this channel is intentionally riddled with mistakes, to generate comments and attract even more viewers looking to spot the mistakes.
I think he met Guernica, not Guadacanal. But he said Guadacanal. Maybe these were the same German planes that bombed Pearl Harbor referenced in the comedy movie Animal House.
In a parallel universe Germany defeated Russia and the West defeated Germany. It would have been a very different planet earth after 1945. Imagination 😎
Henkels!! What type of bloody pronunciation is that!! I never knew the Luftwaffe were fighting in Guadalcanal during the Spanish Civil War That's 16,180 km from Spain. How could you mix this up with Guadalajara?
The Spanish couldn't source new or replacement German motors for their fleet of genuine 111s and their own home-built copies, so in the early '50 they had to fall back on the British-built 'Merlin' as the best alternative engine for the type.
"Part of his debts" 6 million soldiers were held captive as slave laborers in France, and at the same time tens of thousands of children starved to death in Germany This was not a "contract"
You do realize that He-111 (that was born basically as a CIVILIAN-TRANSPORT plane in & around the mid-30's) was - by the time of the "Battle Of Britain" (...as some still call it...) - already by then an OBSOLETE bomber?? ...MOST OF ALL! - it was a TACTICAL bomber - it was never designed to have a strategic role (i.e: it was NEVER MEANT TO CARRY OUT OPERATIONS DEEP BEHIND ENEMY LINES & BOMB "STRATEGIC" OBJECTIVES" like factories, railway-stations & whatnot). It was EXTREMELY VULNERABLE to attacks even carried out by "Hurricanes" armed with .308 machine guns. "Spitfires" that were FAST - AGILE and (later on) ARMED WITH 20mm "HS" auto-cannons made MINCEMEAT out of them. The Germans already had planes better suited to that role (various "Junkers" and "Dorniers") - that "fared" a bit better, but - still! - Germany never developed a purely "strategic wing" of bombers - like LeMay did - planes to be used independently and bring the fight to heart of enemy territory - UNLIKE the British AVRO-"Lancasters" or the American B-17's (not to even mention the spectacular British "Mosquitos", that started raiding France, Holland, Belgium). Germans never believed in it, but Hitler & Goering wanted to use them regardless to fight over enemy territory... and "Heinkels" -111 suffered tremendously by 1940/'41. They had a "revival" in later years over the Balkans, in the intial stages of "Barbarossa", but most of all - in the South (Africa - Sicily - Italy). They were good on the offensive to strike pre-determined (STATIONARY!) targets. Once the war started to turn their crews became cannon-fodder.
The Germans decided to use dive-bombing techniques for better accuracy in hitting targets: the Ju88 could dive-bomb but the He111 was only suited to level-bombing.
Pilots Discovered the Deadly Flaw of the Henkel, Attack STRAIGHT IN THE NOSE, Defense weps couldn't aim straught ahead, and the See Theu Nosecone that German Pilots and Bombadiers Loved up till they Reaized.
These He 111 were also used as an alternate for launching the V1 _flying_ _bomb._ Attached under the right wing, it could be brought nearer to its destination and be released at 2000m height. The technic was later used by NASA to launch the X-15. 🚀🏴☠️🎸
One of the Heinkel-launched 'V1s' destroyed a farmhouse on December 24th, 1944, at a spot about a mile from where I'm typing this note. The bomb destroyed a farmhouse and killed the three occupants. The V1s intended target was most likely the city area that was nearly ten miles and a few minutes further on from where it landed.
Not even the thumbnail shows a He 111... it actually shows a Spanish-built Casa 2.111 in fake German colours, easily identified by its Rolls-Royce Merlin engines in lieu of the inverted V12 Daimlers
@@MonochromaticLightsource Yeah. I get that. What about the range. At the time of the civil war, the eastern coast of Spain was under republican control.
Some years back, I got roped into a solo assignment in Albany, NY. Driving around in boredom one weekend, I recognized two amazing and highly distinctive warbirds parked at the airport: a Boeing B-17 and a Heinkel He-111. They were there as part of a tour on their way to a major airshow elsewhere, and were open to the public (static display only, no flights). The Heinkel was actually built in Spain in 1946 (possibly ''47, I'm no longer sure) but had been "tweaked" to match the general specs of its earlier Luftwaffe brethren. The view through the front greenhouse was amazing, and even though it was just as spartan/utilitarian inside as the B-17 parked nearby, it somehow felt more "futuristic" due to its streamlining. I have just a few photos (this was pre-digital cameras & smartphones) but clearly remember what the 111 looked like inside. Quite an engineering feat.
Thats where the B-29 "leapfrogged" all bombers of that time
The Spanish Heinkel was probably fitted with Merlin engines as the original was not available. The ones in Battle of Britain film used Merlins That would have not had the same sound of the originals which had a distinctive sound which was unsettling .
I'm just glad the this He 111 was persevered and not scrapped as was the fate of most german aircraft and tanks.
preserved 😊
@@xfirehurican I heard that there are only 5 original German-built Heinkel He. 111s in existence, but none of them are airworthy.
What do you mean by "persevered"?
@@nicholasbell9017 pretty obvious what he meant.
A lot of BF-109s went to Isreal after the war
Most He111 left are actually Spanish copies built under license. With British engines. Watch the movies Patton and the Battle of Britain. Both 1969 movies. The aircraft are flown in both
Nice, I wondered why they seemed to have so many available
The thumbnail for the video actually shows a Merlin-engined Casa. Probably taken from a still of one of these movies.
@@stonefox9124 …. Several thousand were built. Most were destroyed. A fifty would be a huge number. If there’s that many still flying
The Battle of Britain film only ever shows three Casa 111 at any one time. I believe that is all they had available.
@@Dave5843-d9m …. Good use was made of them
A member of my family saw He111s coming up BelfastLough during the Blitz on Belfast . She was a schoolgirl at the time. She told me she could see the pilots they were so low.The drone of their engines was unmistakable .
How frightening that must have been.
I wasn't aware that the Germans bombed Belfast, but I suppose the port would have been a strategic target.
My mother grew up in South Wales and said the same thing about the sound. In the '90s we lived near an airport and she said the sound of twin engine aircraft flying over still bothered her.
Belfast was heavily bombed in WW11, the Dublin City Council sent the Dublin Fire Belgrade to Belfast to fight the fires resulting from the continuing bombing.
@5:03 The narrator misspoke, not the island of Guadalcanal of the Solomon Islands, but the city of Guadalajara of Spain.
I noticed that too. I thought maybe I misheard it. I hope this is not an AI narrator. I've been watching this channel quite a while and that's the first time so hopefully not.
Yeah, that got me to stop and rewind several times. However, considering the crap we have to endure from other channels, I suppose we can forgive an occasional gaffe on this great channel. If this is the worst mistake this otherwise outstanding narrator makes, a pass is definitely in older!
I agree. This is a good channel. It's entertaining and informative. Usually it is pretty descriptive and sometimes I even learn something.
Another example of a yank putting their spin on the history of WW2 they sat on their hands and let the British and her allies fight. If the Japs hadn't kicked them in the crutch they would have sat back and sold arms and let the rest of the allies die
Personally, I would prefer it if 90% of the adjectives were deleted. Another point is the bomb load. 75 ×100lb bombs externally? I doubt it. Bombs, torpedoes, and V1 flying bombs were carried externally, though. Otherwise, it's quite interesting.
I think it's very cool with the ending of the story of this beautiful aircraft living happily ever after at the RAF museum!
Beautiful aircraft.
...I always thought so too.........
Indeed , the Heinkel - 111 was the Luftwaffe's MAJOR workhorse throughout that conflict .
In My opinion one of the Prettiest , Large Aircraft , ever built too . Like the Mosquito , it just " Looks Right " .
Love stories like this. So much history.
I love when the history is preserved!
My dad had a London Fog raincoat. He also fought in the battle of the bulge. He died in 1979. RIP
Good on the American boys for recognising the quality of the aircraft and wanting to preserve it. They did history a big favour.
It's HI nkel not Henkel! Plus in minute 2 you're showing a Spitfire production line. Plus some flying shots are of a Messerschmidt ME110. And an Italian SM79 bomber. And a 4 engined Condor. Oh dear.
Henkel is a German chemical company (detergents, adhesives etc.) not an aircraft manufacturer
@@frankmitchell3594 Hinkel's a Jewish name.
This channel is infamous for using unrelated visuals. The actual story is about 1/20th of the overall duration..
@@wilkybarkid
Not alone in using unrelated footage, this channel.
By the way I’ve always been puzzled by this footage of Dunkirk @ 9:31 ->
Looks like from a movie made in Hollywood during the war, perhaps by 20th Century Fox.
The scenes of the troops under bombing look very realistic.
Some others show British troops piling up in rowing boats in panic.
I’ve seen extracts of this movie
featured in various documentaries, but surely it’s not authentic footage.
Can you please tell me ?
Thank you.
You must be new here every video uses stock footage and it is not always accurate to the mentioned vehicle
Why are you showing a Condor suddenly...
A "Condor" is the FW 200. Not Heinkel, Focke-Wulf.
What a flash!
I do remember that He 111 at the RAF Museum, still treasue some photos of her. Just loved the history, the preservation and care in the museum, when visiting London in the summer during the 1990s (93, 94 and 96). Back then, when the UK, was still worth it…
Cheers
If they couldn't figure out how the lower their landing gear how did they take off in the first place and raise it?
There were no German planes at Guadalcanal. I say this as a teacher, it's "HIGHN-kel," not "HEEN-kel." Thank-you for your efforts, Dark. 🙋🏻♂️
It's also "Loo-twaffuh", not "loof-waffuh". I'm no teacher, but I'm a student of language and linguistics, and I've heard it pronounced by actual Germans.
@@Rotorhead1651 It's neither, but something like "looft-vaffuh". Oh yes, and "Hynkle".
I'm glad they saved the He 111, it's a beautiful plane.
Greatest voice on UA-cam!!
“The tail section featured a single vertical stabiliser and horizontal stabiliser, enhancing the distinctive appearance of Heinkel’s bomber”
This isn’t a school assignment with a minimum word count 😂
The Heinkel was a good-looking, well-streamlined plane for a military aircraft: the single fin-and-rudder feature made it better-looking than most of its contemporaries which had twin fins and rudders that aided the positioning of rotary gun turrets, the absence of which was one of the Heinkel's defensive shortcomings.
the voice is honestly perfect for this type of video
Having a 'personal' He-111, with fuel, BRAVO ZULU, Yanks!
It could be mentioned that 'later versions powered by upgraded engines' used Junkers Jumo engines rather than DBs (Battle of Britain models onwards).
Gotta love Aviators and their ingenuity.
So much colourful dialogue with so many mistakes, and nearly a 50% level of irrelevant footage. I'd always hoped that this channel would eventually get it's act (and facts) together, but here we are some four years later, and no improvement. Such a shame.
That was a great story!! Thank you.
Here we are, all these years later, and we haven't learned anything about civility yet.
Guadalcanal?? Is that right?
You have got to start Googling something before typing... the Island was named after the town in Spain. Remember, the Spanish were in control of large parts of the Pacific at one point.
He meant "Guernica."
@@robert-trading-as-Bob69 I doubt that the German Condor legion were attacking islands in the pacific. Logic would dictate otherwise. Google is entirely unnecessary in this case. 🙄
@@matthewjay660 That’s the place. So easy to get confused with Guadalcanal! 😄
@@eddiebruv Sadly, there is a town in Spain called Guadalcanal... sucks to be as stupid as you.
Was it bombed? Fuck knows.
Great story.
I like the Style that they executed the plan with. Just walk away.
No better way to test equipment and techniques than a small war.
Just caught on. We been doing that at least since we pulled out of Vietnam nam
Excellent as usual.
But please: pronunciation is HEinkel, not Hinkel.
Hì-enkel( phonetic).
@@j.bradleyheck1589 Thanks I never knew. I have been saying: "He-enkel" all these years!
Nice crazy story, seen it in the RAF museum but didnt know all that.
Some confusing footage when talking about the He-111 but showing either FW Condor or Bf-110
Good Video/Info.
That’s awesome they didn’t destroy it and put in the museum great video
So glad she wasn't cut up.😊
Thank you do much for this excellent channal and all your hard work.
I would appriciate if you can avoid the background music after the first minute intro. It is disturbing to listen the important and interesting information you bring out.
Again, well done!
Makes me happy that that old war bird was saved and preserved, even if it was an enemy plane.
Great ch !!!
I'm guilty also by posting this, but, People commenting about his "errors" are doing exactly what he wants....there are no " "errors" in his videos...everything is deliberate to get more views and comments. Even a negative comment is $$$ for him. I usually just listen anymore and don't really pay attention to what (usually unrelated) flashs up on the screen because he's been operating like this on most of his channels for years.
Thanks - it's not just me who thinks it's all dodgy stuff here !
The narrative is usually there or thereabouts, the video sometimes varies to eye candy land. Like you, I mostly listen to it as a podcast than watch it.
3:44 old mate needs to learn the difference between an He111 and Bf110 and 5:19 an Fw Condor and 8:15 an Italian Savoia-Marchetti bomber and 9:03 a Ju88 and 11:01 Ju52. Interesting to hear the history of the He111 in the UK, I saw it and have photos from when I was there in 1983.
Awesome story as you tell it!
How about covering the 5 engined Heinkel 111, the Zwelling. That would be an aircraft worth researching.
Zwilling
Don't know if it still is there but I saw an He-111 flying around Dallas,Tx about 30 years ago. Very cool aircraft. I noticed it when setting in my KW900L at the terminal one day.
I can't imagine the relief of being on the ground, hopeless. Then you hear that familiar sound above and realize your brothers and sisters in the air got your back.
Don't think I would class the acquisition of enemy tech as "stolen".
They saved it❤
A strange one.
Why. all of a sudden, are you mispronouncing the name Heinkel? HENkel is an chemicals and consumer products company, and is completely unrelated to the aircraft manufacturer, HEINkel. What surprises me is that you have pronounced it properly in previous videos, so why now...?
Also there is only one Royal Navy - no need to say "the British Royal Navy".
The Royal Netherlands Navy, Royal Australian Navy, Royal Canadian Navy, and Royal New Zealand Navy all fought in World War II.
Edit: I see what you meant. Royal Navy almost always means the UK one. But, I think the Aussies, Kiwis, Canucks, and Dutch deserve credit, too!
@@natquesenberry6368The Royal Navy IS the one and only British navy. The others you mention are indeed 'Royal', if only due to the fact that all, except the Royal Netherlands Navy, are former British colonies, but they are referred to exactly as you mention - they are not THE Royal Navy.
Oh, and the same goes for the Royal Air Force too. 😁
@CaptainQuark9 fair enough. That makes sense.
I generally appreciate your videos. The title of this one is more glib than factual: the "U.S." did not "refuse" to destroy this Heinkel H-20 Aircraft.
What a wonderful story!
The clickbait picture is showing a Casa 2.111, not a Heinkel... And while you are talking about the He111 I see Bf110, Fw200, SM79, Do217 and/or Ju88 cockpit, Ju290 cockpit, and more... Again you succeeded in a sloppy post, mate! Its not just about the story, the visuals have to match there. If not, what can we believe is really true then???
The " strange" stolen plane from the title appears at the 13 minute mark.
5:52 the woman of blonde hair holding a bayonet while shouldering a rifle.
I suspect you meant Gurnecia.
Good story, but could have used more film of He111, and less of Fw200. Most of us can count...and four engines just don't fit this story. Busted! 😂
Sometimes I think this channel is intentionally riddled with mistakes, to generate comments and attract even more viewers looking to spot the mistakes.
@@trekkeruss Good theory, but it's just careless composition and editing. Accuracy is not its strong point . . .
Welcome to UA-cam.
I think he met Guernica, not Guadacanal. But he said Guadacanal. Maybe these were the same German planes that bombed Pearl Harbor referenced in the comedy movie Animal House.
And “Hinkel” instead of “Heinkel” throughout. Put my teeth on edge.
Color me surprised a country would say hey we got your back only to test their own weapons for future battles. Almost like they still do this today.
Great story!
In a parallel universe Germany defeated Russia and the West defeated Germany. It would have been a very different planet earth after 1945. Imagination 😎
Henkels!! What type of bloody pronunciation is that!!
I never knew the Luftwaffe were fighting in Guadalcanal during the Spanish Civil War That's 16,180 km from Spain. How could you mix this up with Guadalajara?
Good story. 👽👍
Heinkels . . . "emerged from the London fog". At 13,000 feet?
5:30....The skies of Guadalcanal? Really?
How do you mispronounce Heinkel?
Please correctly pronounce Heinkel (like Hine kel). Otherwise excellent!
your assessment of bombload internal and external is in need of checking .
How cool!
A merlin-powered Heinkel ? Strange indeed.
The Spanish couldn't source new or replacement German motors for their fleet of genuine 111s and their own home-built copies, so in the early '50 they had to fall back on the British-built 'Merlin' as the best alternative engine for the type.
@@None-zc5vg I was being sarcastic. This idiot couldn't even find footage of the real thing.
"Part of his debts"
6 million soldiers were held captive as slave laborers in France, and at the same time tens of thousands of children starved to death in Germany
This was not a "contract"
You do realize that He-111 (that was born basically as a CIVILIAN-TRANSPORT plane in & around the mid-30's) was - by the time of the "Battle Of Britain" (...as some still call it...) - already by then an OBSOLETE bomber?? ...MOST OF ALL! - it was a TACTICAL bomber - it was never designed to have a strategic role (i.e: it was NEVER MEANT TO CARRY OUT OPERATIONS DEEP BEHIND ENEMY LINES & BOMB "STRATEGIC" OBJECTIVES" like factories, railway-stations & whatnot). It was EXTREMELY VULNERABLE to attacks even carried out by "Hurricanes" armed with .308 machine guns. "Spitfires" that were FAST - AGILE and (later on) ARMED WITH 20mm "HS" auto-cannons made MINCEMEAT out of them. The Germans already had planes better suited to that role (various "Junkers" and "Dorniers") - that "fared" a bit better, but - still! - Germany never developed a purely "strategic wing" of bombers - like LeMay did - planes to be used independently and bring the fight to heart of enemy territory - UNLIKE the British AVRO-"Lancasters" or the American B-17's (not to even mention the spectacular British "Mosquitos", that started raiding France, Holland, Belgium). Germans never believed in it, but Hitler & Goering wanted to use them regardless to fight over enemy territory... and "Heinkels" -111 suffered tremendously by 1940/'41. They had a "revival" in later years over the Balkans, in the intial stages of "Barbarossa", but most of all - in the South (Africa - Sicily - Italy).
They were good on the offensive to strike pre-determined (STATIONARY!) targets. Once the war started to turn their crews became cannon-fodder.
Another great vid.
Nice.
Henkel makes adhesives. Heinkel manufactured planes ….and cars ..
It’s a shame not more of these are still flying I think there is just one of the Spanish made planes with RR Merlin engines
I was told if an German officer, well after wwii, was shocked when while in Spain he saw a Spanish build He111 comming down the runway.
Another good presentation ruined by background noise masquerading as Muzak.
I think that the Ju 88 was a better bomber and the Dorronia as they had more defensive guns and did not have so mutch glass in the front dome
Much better. Designed right from the start as a very manauverable high speed bomber.
The He-111 was a compromise to hide its true function.
Especially when they strapped on those antitank cannons!
Dorronia ? Dornier perhaps ?
The Germans decided to use dive-bombing techniques for better accuracy in hitting targets: the Ju88 could dive-bomb but the He111 was only suited to level-bombing.
Pilots Discovered the Deadly Flaw of the Henkel, Attack STRAIGHT IN THE NOSE, Defense weps couldn't aim straught ahead, and the See Theu Nosecone that German Pilots and Bombadiers Loved up till they Reaized.
I sometimes wonder if these Dark Skies videos are generated by AI.
Why did you include footage of the Fw-200 Condor when talking about the He-111?
These He 111 were also used as an alternate for launching the V1 _flying_ _bomb._ Attached under the right wing, it could be brought nearer to its destination and be released at 2000m height. The technic was later used by NASA to launch the X-15.
🚀🏴☠️🎸
One of the Heinkel-launched 'V1s' destroyed a farmhouse on December 24th, 1944, at a spot about a mile from where I'm typing this note. The bomb destroyed a farmhouse and killed the three occupants. The V1s intended target was most likely the city area that was nearly ten miles and a few minutes further on from where it landed.
Cool story!
The title is grammatically incorrect. You might say:
The Strange Luftwaffe Plane Stolen by the US
" Guadalcanal"?
Guernica..even if I spelled that later correctly, I know my history.
Guadalcanal is in the South Pacific, I was thrown off by this too.
I think he mispronounced Guadalajara.
@@donmitchyt He really doesn't know the stuff he speaks about. It's mostly fluff.
Guadal canal??? That's in the Solomon Islands, half the planet away.
The title of this is sort of misleading
Is yhe narrator of dark skies AI? I can't quite put my finger on it
"Hinckel"?? ....What a Hinckel?
Great video
Heinkel is pronounced HIGH-nkel, not Hinkel
Hinkel? Oy veh!
Thanks Yanks🇺🇲🇬🇧👍
Great video
Guadelcanal? Perhaps the AI narrator couldn't pronounce Gaudalajara
The Spanish version is super pretty.
Not even the thumbnail shows a He 111... it actually shows a Spanish-built Casa 2.111 in fake German colours, easily identified by its Rolls-Royce Merlin engines in lieu of the inverted V12 Daimlers
If you're goin g to use AI voice overs, please make sure it knows what to say. MG-131 is not M6 131. Guadalajara is not Guadalcanal
That’s what you get with AI.
How did the Germans fly from Germany to Spain since they wouldn’t fly over France?
Over the Alps, turn right when you reach Italy?
@@MonochromaticLightsource Yeah. I get that. What about the range. At the time of the civil war, the eastern coast of Spain was under republican control.