Worlds Worst Creationist? - Atheist Challenge Level 1
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
- LIKE OUR FACEBOOK PAGE!!
/ 597755473622317
Creationism has met a new low.....Dislike if you are a Creationist. This is intended for entertainment purposes pointing out the ignorance of creationists. This video was meant to be comedic and disturbing in nature. The message in it is imperative. All rational people who watch him can see right through his lies. If you think IM the one who is being "rude" I am not telling blacks that they are foolish for believing in evolution because its supports racism.
"I believe religion should be treated with ridicule, hatred, and contempt, and I claim that right" - Hitchens
Link to His Credentials: atsyouthcongres...
Don't pray in my schools and I won't think in your church
It's not "your" school. And children are required by law to attend school, so they shouldn't lose any of their constitutional rights when they attend school. But you are not required by law to attend a church, and no one would mind that you think while in church, in fact they would welcome it. Just don't fall into the trap of believing that the first thought you have about something religious is going to be the correct one. Christianity is for deep thinkers, who look intently into God's laws and statutes and "history lessons" to discern the deep meanings in them.
what schools are your schools
u own schools? wtf haha thats so cool!
Drugaddict&Atheist from The Netherlands I saw it on a bumper sticker, so u can use it
I am a taxpayer in America... So YES I OWN THE SCHOOLS!
He hit the nail on the head when he said creationist are looked upon as being ignorant and uneducated and then did a spectacular job of demonstrating why that is so. Lol
LMFAO.
LOL, very true. If he turned out to be an agent provocateur I wouldn't be surprised.
Then again, if he's 100% genuine I'd be less surprised.
Matt Smith LOLOLMFAO, you are absolutely right!!!!
Matt Smith Yes, well said.
Yes. ROTFLOL
I know of no other business other than religion where you could sell an invisible non existent product and not be brought up on charges of fraud... and do it TAX FREE
How much does he charge?
jamie Russell not much, you just have to give up your mind.
Granted much of it is fraud... There is a ton of fraud perpetrated by those who hide inside a cloak of science too.
fred fredson
"Granted much of it is fraud... There is a ton of fraud perpetrated by those who hide inside a cloak of science too."
Except you can test and falsify the claims of science, and use them in industry.
Carl Pen
"I know of no other business other than religion where you could sell an invisible non existent product and not be brought up on charges of fraud... and do it TAX FREE"
That will change.
People see pastors buying multiple personal jets, multiple multimillion dollar homes whilst the streets fill with homeless. See them getting caught with drugs and heterosexual and gay prostitutes... See them lying at tax investigations...
There's a breaking point.
"The more educated I became; I have a doctorate now, I believe in creation."
Sorry, an honorary doctorate doesn't equate to being educated.
Probably a DD, which means he knows as much about biology as any totally uninformed absolute fucking idiot.
+Chris Snyder +M. Hall Both right - it was an honorary DD from Southern Adventist University! I have an honorary Sainthood from my mother so I can say with full authority that Creationism is crap.
Of course he has to say that! He's making tons of money deceiving people. I would say I believed in pink unicorns if it made me money.
+George Martinez Many are in it for the money, the used car salesmen of the Hovind clan (Ken and his less intelligent son) particularly so, however some of these idiots are truly delusional and believe what they are saying.
+George Martinez You have no idea what are you talking about. His father was a billionaire and he do not take even a penny.His story was all over in the news.Read his life story." The richest cave man".
Here's my log...
- 4 minutes crying
- 5 minutes ears are bleeding
- 6 minutes i am losing basic motor functions
- 7 minutes at the hospital now... pls send dawkins..
I literally started to make despairing whale sounds before assuming the fetal position, the whole time facepalming about once every three to four seconds. I feel your pain.
falconpawnch7 one of the best comments I think I have ever read. I was pretty much the same apart from all the swearing.
falconpawnch7
:D
falconpawnch7 By the end of it, I was palming other people's faces...
Minute 1 hitting my head on the wall
Cars don't reproduce but apparently Creationists think this is a good way to explain how evolution didn't happen. Yeah...lot's of logic going on there.
Not to mention that if they did reproduce, it would be an example of divergent evolution.
Anyone not bought into that crap would have got up and walked out when he did that automobile thing. Utter unsupportable brain-drippings.
Conversion of inert stuff into life on earth. The mechanism
ua-cam.com/video/XJsGWCbFvo8/v-deo.html
Calendars disproves God.
ua-cam.com/video/qzpgp6JvPDU/v-deo.html
Just because we can reproduce doesnt mean evolution is true. Just means we simply have beem created to reproduce within our kind.
@@maow9240
Creation says NOTHING about process and mechanism. It does not address HOW. It makes no claims upon HOW. It does not provide any answer. It is EMPTY of content in that regard.
Evolution offers an explination of HOW based upon observed phenomena.
God can chose to use any method to bring about His Creation... including Evolution. God and Creation DO NOT rule out Evolution!
You godbotherers limit your God to the limits of yourselves. You do not have the belief that God can be a talented Scientist and Architect and Engineer. You prefer to believe Him limited to ad hoc, one off solutions to each individual problem, rather than Him being possessed of Intelligence. You speak of 'Intelligent Design' but render your God into a bumbling idiot.
You are blasphemers! You have made God into your idea of Him.
You are Fools!
This guy is the meaning of stupidity
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limit."
-Albert Einstein
IKR 😒. If only we could lock these dangerous gawd weirdos up for good no shame with their faith mindset team. Just proving that they are sooooo poison.
I find it interesting that religious people tend to undermine theory of evolution by calling it a 'religion'. It's as if they understood that religions are inferior to science and evidence despite the fact that they themselves follow a religion.
Christians hate to be called religious. They are BELIEVER, which is much more noble. Only Muslims, Buddhists and such shit are religious.
well, they are believers in religion which makes them religious.
Theology used to be called the queen of all sciences just about a century ago, and God is sovereign over all creation, He is the founder of all laws and principles of life, both spiritual, moral and physical, hence He is not contradicting Himself, God's Word and Science are complimentary.
All religions sucks,but Christianity sucks most
Atheism is just as much a religion as not collecting stamps is a hobby.I have tried to explain to some of my religious relatives,whom, by the way, I happen to love dearly, that the word ATHEIST comes from two Greek word elements_ A meaning without and THEOS meaning god. So atheism is the total opposite of religion. What is so difficult to understand. Needless to say, I have had minimal success.
The funny part is when you open a jar of peanut butter, there IS new life within it. It is stuffed with bacteria which is constantly undergoing mitosis to create multiple new bacteria cells. It's just so small you can't see it
Ijaz Ahmed That's not actually new life (as in a second abiogenesis) - it's pre-existing life reproducing. In fact, this is precisely why we don't "occasionally" find new life on Earth - abiogenesis happens so slowly that if there is already existing life, it will gobble up the nutrients well before new life could form. We would have to keep a nutrient-rich environment sterile for millions or perhaps billions of years to give a chance for new life to take off.
What about mutants?
Bacteria dont undergo mitosis they undergo binary fission but yeah i agree haha
theists don' believe in microscopes, they think they're tools of the devil.
Ijaz Ahmed
The peanut butter argument is an argument against "spontaneous generation," which was disproved a long time ago. Creationists hope that if they can mix up the definitions of evolution with the definition of spontaneous generation, they will somehow disprove evolution.
It's the same argument as this: I define God to be a square circle. Logically, a square circle cannot exist, therefore I have disproved God.
This guy has never studied evolution before has he?
mazingdaddid ...I bet he thinks that the stork delivers the babies
Yes, he has: the bible. Besides that ...
So the young lady believes in creationism because it seems logical???? WTF So two fully adult newborns were tricked into eating a magical piece of fruit by a talking snake... Thats logical???? man how do people believe this stuff 😓
He took biology freshman year in high school
His last name is incredibly ironic! classic
This guy says he grew up learning “Evolution”, then gave it up for religion, but understands neither. Wow. Thankfully for him, he found a dumber audience.
Somebody needs to remind the fool that Jesus feeding fish to 5000 is not an endorsement of vegetarianism.
well he is in church, best place to feed shitty ideas
@Michael Brown I'm not entirely sure what you're claiming. You think Dawkins claims Darwin thought airplanes were birds? I don't have any "valid analogies" to support any of that stuff. But I smell a strawman in there. Are you saying Dawkins thinks swallows are NOT intelligently designed? Because, yeah, I'd be surprised if he thought they were, from what I've heard about him.
@Michael Brown Oh, ok. Yeah, I don't put stock in what people say about ideas, only ideas themselves. That's why, when Christians say Darwin repented his ideas, I say, who cares? Even if he did, good ideas don't become bad because the person who says them may be disagreeable. It's clear that airplanes are designed, and swallows are not. If Dawkins wants to make up words for ideas he has, whatevs.
@Michael Brown What's your evidence?
Well, that covers my BS quota for the next few months at least.
Craig Corson my penis is 12.5, inches... There's another 4 months
:^)
I have to buy a new BS meter, as the 200 I have blew up while listening to this shit.
A Theos
That's the thing about BS. No matter how deep the pile, someone can always come along and add more to it.
You mean, your Truth quota.
I wonder where his doctorate came from, a cereal box, hm.
Christian fundamentalists created colleges and managed to acquire accredidation for them, for the puropse of graduating creationists with phD's.
It appears that his DD (Doctor of Divinity) is an honorary one. He is a Second Day Adventist. This church runs its own colleges and grants degrees that are seldom accredited by any legitimate institution, (with good reason). I've had a good poke around and can't find a source that tells where he was educated or received the honorary "degree". An interesting note: he is virulently anti-Catholic and was "deported" from the Vatican while trying to film a diatribe against the Pope. Apparently Vatican security escorted him out of the Vatican, took him to the airport in Rome and put him on a plane back to the US.
@George Nolan Upstairs college.
His high school diploma (X2) his college degree and his Doctor of Ministry ARE ALL HONORARY by Seventh Day Adventist institutions. He is basically a high school drop out who managed to read the bible and "get saved"!!! The rest is empty history!!!
Icdc college
People who spread ignorance like these people need to be sent to jail for threatening the future progress of humanity.
DBHMedia They should try them for Corruption of the Youth, like the religious nutters did to Socrates.
Name ONE example of how the Theory of Evolution contributed to the ..."Progress of Humanity ". ? ? ?
Uhm, wrong. They need psychiatric care, and all of us are to blame for their actions. It is WE who do not call them psychotic and send them to psychiatric care like we should do.
- it's the basis of modern genetics and bioligy
- cancer-treatment,
- studies how and why viruses and bacteria spread
- The very possibility to breed new sorts of crops, fruits and animals
I think that is the same thing they want to do in reverse. It's moraly wrong to persecute one because of ones opinion.
Oh and every 'ignorant' you sent to jail serves as an undeniable martyr for freedom of speech. Even if the thought may be tempting - vengeance is no pathway to freedom or anything else.
Ridicule their views, explain, make your standpoint. Proof that you have the better idea instead of merely thoughts of revenge. Keep the moral highground. Because if not - the endeavor to stop them fails and we just become a distorted reflection of them.
Doug Batchelor is a living proof that man evolved from a cucumber.
Or that Neanderthals still exist.
Atcar Lumsy 😂
I've seen cucumbers more intelligent.
I seriously doubt that, I mean really... cucumbers are beneficial. 🙂
@@catalyst2.095 You're dissing cucumbers there are bricks that have more intelligence than Batchelor and his audience
8:40 "they dont have the missing links between the bats and the bird"
this guy just proved he new nothing about bats even the well known fact that bats are not birds but mammals
According to his holy book, bats are birds (Leviticus 11:13 and 11:19)
Religion is a retreat from reality. Science is the investigation of reality.
nfrick1 - You more than likely have heard this before (BUT it did not help you) Its better to remain silent and let everyone THINK you are a fool , than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. Sorry but wether you like it or not you have removed all doubt if you think that bats are birds - just like those retarded idiots that said that in the bible which is otherwise known as "The goatherder's guide to the universe". Was god "a Rip -van -Winkel" before the "beginning" - what did he do then? a layabout maybe? Then suddenly decided to get "creative" - what a joke that the human brain got involved in.WE dont know where the universe or life came from - so therefore god - the ignoramus answer.
James Richard, real science is based on empiricism. What happened to science in evolutionary theory? Macroevolution i.e. major transitional changes are all based on nothing but hypotheses and nobody knows the details and it's all a bunch of speculation. That's not science -- that's a "just so" story to "just believe" because authorities in science say so. I challenge you to discuss any one lineage and its evidence. You probably won't take up my challenge though since you "know" everything evolved.
+Kristen Michelle
There's proof for evolution. There are fossils.
oh he has a doctorate now? lemme guess...in theology? worthless degree....
Of course he has a PhD.. Go online. Buy one.
A "Stranger than Seven kinds of Shit" degree.
He has an Honorary Doctorate, along with an Honorary High School Diploma, an Honorary Bachelors Degree and an Honorary Masters Degree. In short, none of his "degrees" even worth the paper its printed on. He is not even smart enough to understand that someone is not getting better educated by collecting a bunch of honorary "degrees."
I have a Bachelor of Theology. And YES, it is a worthless degree.
What about Dr Zakir Naik he is "medical dakterr" (he is very disingenuous about the actual definition of the term scientific theory)
One of the best stand up comedy I have seen on UA-cam! Thank you for sharing.
this is America just as well sad
I respectfully disagree. I find nothing funny or humorous about it. Either he is simply uninformed and pontificating about something he knows nothing about, or he is deliberately lying for reasons of his own. If truth be known, I lean toward the lie hypothesis. It astonishes me when someone holds up a bible as support for creationism and in the same breath accuses someone else of circular reasoning.
These people make a living selling their "belief".
What astonished me is that the buyers can't see he has no actual explanation supported by evidence that gets tested.
But alas, even basic formal logic isn't taught in schools most schools.
But finger points at people as if it validates him.
The desperation of such an act is so evident.
@@Magnum-Farce Yes hurry and get to the women from Adams rib,and the putdown of women ever since
"Evolution is based on racism" I'll remember that the next time my local KKK chapter takes a field trip to the Smithsonian.
😂😂😂
the realization that individuals like this still have an audience saddens me. very painful to watch.
The audience only listens to what a book tells them anyway..so its their choice to believe its real. no need to be saddened by their choice of connecting reality with a outdated book.
Exactly, painful. That’s the word. I knew I find it irritating but it is really painful.
Yeah. His audience are intelligent beings but they maybe just find a way to turn their brains off when listening to him and their pastors. SDA is a multi-billion dollar business. My relatives follows this teaching and maybe one of the main reason why i'm skeptic. They just turn their brains off every saturday lol i never knew how to do that.
Fortunately, polls show that young people are far more likely to believe in evolution. Once the old farts die off, intelligent people may assert themselves.
@@thomasaskew1985 you forgot some people turn religious when they are old. I've seen many in my life. We also must take good care of our olds so they don't fall back to ignorance for bliss
Comment is free and open to anyone with the balls to let someone respond to their comment. Comments that don't allow for a reply will be removed.
Good idea.
More people should do this.
First, their is Young Earth Creationism and Creationism. Creationism is an attempt to show the bible and science can exist side by side when proper interpretation, understanding of ancient civilization, and recreating the context both historical and social within the framework of the conditions and understanding the ancient world knew. Young earth creationism is a relatively new idea high jacked, from traditional creationist, by groups like answers in genesis. Christian Scholars both conservative and liberal have expressed embarrassment and fraud concerning this ultra-fundamental approach to the interpretation of scripture. See: William Lane Crag, N.T Wright and Dr. John Walton for related topics. Don't just stand on the sidelines and throw rocks investigate the other side. Watch, and maybe you'll understand a different side of True Scholarly Theology. Origins Today: Genesis Through Ancient Eyes - John H. Walton, PhD Comment is open to anyone who has investigated the video.
Thank you, and kind salutations from, Germany. The power of "Diction" in other words "HOW do I explain it" is, as your Video drastically demonstrates, strong in them, Crazionautic Crea-ZIONISTS. The diction is often more compelling than the facts, and the so-said "Evolutionists" must learn from it.
First of all, why do you have only a very small part of the sermon? Secondly, what exactly is your point?
Why doesn't god cure baldness?
Hahahaha!!! Best question :)
God actually defend baldness and will kill you if you mock them with angry bears!
He probably shaves his head anyway to look just a tad intelligent lol
+TheHelado36 They will kill you with the armed bears they have a right to.
He's a slaphead himself.
"I believe" ...yes, but scientists 'prove'.
Scientists believe what they cannot prove it's called scientific theory
Not necessarily. Proving is done in mathematics. Sometimes
By what means is evolution proved?
Evolution has been directly observed .
EraserHead777
DNA changes.
That means your dad has different dna than you, you have different dna than your son and so on.
Over MANY generations (when the DNA changes from generation to generation) the DNA is going to be so much different that you wouldnt recognize the difference between your face and face of your grand-grand-grand-gran...son because he would be a different kind of human.
Evolution as we know (surviving of the fittest) happened around 17th in US.
Americans stealed black people from africa.
These africans worked so hard that only the strongest survived (thats why any afro-american would outrun a white guy in US).
My wife listens to him everyday, we're getting a divorce now.
Are you serious?
Vincent DeLaVega really?
Good man
Mistake
Vincent DeLaVega good for u. I'll sign release form.
they can't find the missing link between Bats and birds? Good grief..
I WONDER WHY
They have found it. It's the same link between mammals and reptiles.
What about the 3 wheeled Reliant?!? Missing link between motorcycle and car: *FOUND!!*
Thought the car from the Flintstones the "Flintmobile"
Hahaha😂😂😂😂😂😂
orion khan lol!
he got it wrong at 6:00, thats not how we date rocks. he proved his ignorance.
BF Dijidox Impossible. The man said that he has a PhD. Do you?
In order to obtain a PhD you need to publish a series of scientific., peer reviewed papers. He has not - ergo he does not hold a PhD.
Jarl- While it is true that to obtain a PhD, one must produce a peer-reviewed thesis, one can qualify for a PhD in a variety of non-scientific fields. I'm guessing that his is a PhD in Theology, which you and I are likely to agree is practically worthless.
X Million You can eliminate "practically" as soon as he posed the analogy of a motorcycle evolving into a car and then the car evolving into a truck.
To get a "proper" Phd in Theology you still need to write a theses - publish it, and defend it.
I literally felt my brain cells dying during this video
They died the moment you denied God, but listening to the message nearly gave them life back.
Wow! wow, wow, WOW! No way is this real, can’t be true! There are some people like this? He can’t even be the missing link, more like the rejected link of evolution.
@@bernardlongwe7330 bruh
@@bernardlongwe7330 bruh
And we still have the likes of mboro and bushiri here at home.
God doesnt answer prayers for hair?
Shure does. The Good Book says...If you don't hare about me and what I say, - I won't hare about you either. Excerpt from the DTV version of the Bible.
Haahaa
Or reason.
HAHAHa. Kudos bro. LMAO
Or lost limbs
quite possibly the most intellectually dishonest person I have ever heard speak!
You are unfair. They are psychotic, like all other theists. Thy do not do reality.
MichaelLeroi Have you ever heard of Kent Hovind? He makes this guy look like a schoolgirl............granted a bald schoolgirl, but a schoolgirl none the less
The Refining Reason Debate: Matt Dillahunty VS Sye Ten Bruggencate. This debate is one of the worst i have ever seen on the net. Sye Ten Burggencate is on my topp five list over most fuckt up people on this planet:
That's my nightmare-fuel for the next two weeks. Thank you... need brain bleach now...
I don't know if professional apologetics are really psychotic - or just elaborate con-artists. I mean, he makes a heap of money every time he fills up his church with gullible folks. Every book he sells, every appearence...
I'm fairly sure, that at least both Hovinds and Ken Ham are well aware of all the evidence and know that they are purposfully spread their lies.
Generalisations like 'all theists are psychotic' ... doesn't help much and isn't true, too.
People raised in an religious enviroment, with no exposure to science or secular education can't act much else than believe.
And if confronted with evidence they have to make a choice - stay true to themselves or to their belief-system. But this comes with a heavy load:
Staying true to oneself might easily lead to loosing your family, your friends, your workplace and social standing.
So how would you present this evidence: "Hey you idiot - let me show you the truth. By the way I despise you and your religion and when you stop believing you loose every social connection you have and I don't show any sign of helping you out, you moron - so decide, what are you gonna do now?"
I'd say a fundamentalistic religous enviroment is in itself harmful and kind of psychotic. But the people don't need to be automatically.
Most former believers, at least on youtube, like Paulogia, Aron Ra and Matt Dilahunty say themselves, they don't get smarter by stop believing, they just changed their perspective on evidence and rationalism.
4:38 The only thing he's right : evolution has the burden of the proof (creation too). And guess what : proofs have been found and can be found everywhere for the case of evolution. Creation has no proof.
So you believe that billions of stars and planets (, most of which are thousands of times larger than the earth, ) just "happened...." ? You are truly a person of great faith. You should read " I don't have enough faith to be an Atheist " by Turek and Geisler
Ever heard of an accretion disk? Yeah, you need to educate yourself.
Too much evidence against the bible, why waste time on such a book?
Evolution has nothing to do with the stars and the planets. That's cosmology. And cosmology doesn't claim the big bang just "happened". In science you are allowed to say "we don't know how this happened yet". This is what cosmologists are currently saying.
This things don't just "happened". It's a chain of cause and effects reaching back about 15 billion years to the big bang.
There is an abundance of evidence for all of this. And while science can't explain everything, we have a good grasp on about how it happened.
This whole 'just happened' claim is so grossly misrepresenting what we know and what we can proof, you can't imagine...
If you really want to challenge, then you should at least do the honorable thing and truly try to understand the point you are attacking.
Almost threw up, but no one, absolutely no one, beats the Banana Man.
There is one that beats him... the fire breathing Dragon guy, cause nostrils were too small... look for him.
@@flashbodie1 Lol! Oh yeah!! He said legends of fire breathing dragons came from dinosaurs breathing so fast because of tiny nostrils that their nostrils combusted... Somebody actually claimed to believe that.
@@adamgrotto8163 thats the one.... lol
Spankin' Fred
Well they believe in talking snakes and donkeys and burning bushes that speak so I suppose fire breathing dragons seem perfectly plausible in their big scheme of things .
Good prop. 'And now, I am going to show you where a banana fits'
0:42 "I believe dinosaurs, or DRAGONS..." Hahaha!!! I'm dying laughing!
When I was a kid I used to play Dungeons and Dinosaurs.
The bible says there are dragons so they must be real. Just like the zombies, talking donkeys, and unicorns it also mentions 🦄
@@PraiseTheFSMonster There are talking donkeys, didn't you watch Shrek?
Not surprising. Amazing Facts is an arm of the Seventh Day Adventist Church (Ben Carson's denomination) - one of the most fundamentalist churches in the world.
+Mark A. Foster, Ph.D. BINGO!
Of course, individual members and churches are quite diverse. Look at one Adventist and you will see a vegan that doesn't watch any tv and movies and only listens to "godly" music. Look at another and you'll see a dude who'll make Netflix and Chill jokes for hours on end and likes to rap. Both of the individuals I am thinking of are teenagers like me, and though I admit the formal is white and the later black, I've seen it the other way around as well, so it shouldn't matter. The church my parents choose to go to does not have drums, and we sing only hymns, and there's even a nearby seminar about how the media distracts us from God. Whereas church camp would sing upbeat praise songs and used to play Disney songs, to the delight of the campers, until some parent complained and they stopped.
TL;DR
I'm an SDgay and you are both very wrong and very right.
PS
Even though health is so important to us, we're responsible for those Little Debbie's that are making you fat.
Often what happens is that these culture wars within denominations lead to even more denominations.
+Mark A. Foster, Ph.D. While there have been small spin offs here and there, I don't think there will be any massive splits anytime soon, especially since progressive and conservative Adventists still share the same core principles: creationism, Sabbath, the secret rapture being a lie by Satan, etc. At least, not until the tribulation. Of course, I could be wrong, but the Seventh Day Adventist church is one of the fastest growing in the world, so there are benefits to being a part of it.
Have you ever been to Gloucester, Dr. Foster?
A person who believes in the literal truth of the bible talks about circular logic. LOL!
Bible=many books
It's called a cyclical tautology.
@@deanmoncaster
Is cicular to support a book by another book? No
@@Jamie-Russell-CME correct it isn't. Only a book that references itself is cyclical. A book that references another written by someone else and is also verified... Is not.
jamie Russell
Many books but no evidence.
I'm not sure about the bike being a Kawasaki, but he just called a Dodge truck a Ford, and a Ferrari a GMC or Dodge. If he can't get that part right, why am I supposed to believe his "science"?
Cause random car company knowledge has no relation to science.
@@Jamie-Russell-CME no because if he can't remember 3 names how can he remember how carbon dating works.
Yes, forget the evolution debate. What really bothers me is a heterosexual man who thinks a Ferrari is a GMC or Dodge. What evolution has to explain is how a man this boring ever managed to reproduce.
@@claumeister1 Church picked his wife. Cuz he's a fucking loser.
@@radfatdaddy4169 Happy to see someone read and liked my comment (I thought it was clever myself), even with the f--word, which in this case I'll make an exception for. Carry on, my wayward son!
But it says so in The Goat Herders Guide to the Universe! I thank Seth for that one,
🤣
😂😂
All of those cars originated from the Model T Ford. CAR EVOLUTION CONFIRMED!
Carvolution!
+Spentont H. Actually, no. That's evolution disproved, because all those variants of cars, including the model T Ford, required intelligent people to design them. And mistakes in the factory are not going to produce a better car, but a faulty one.
Dude, it was a joke. Anyways, a mistake in the car would lead to the manufacturers to improve their cars, leading to better and better cars. Think of the mutations in natural creatures as additions to cars, both leading to an entirely different object/creature.
Spentont H.
What makes you think the Model T Ford (1908) was the first car?
The first automobile, the Benz Velo, was patented in 1886 by Carl Benz.
Most people here are American , and have never seen the naked beauty and untamed power that is an Austin Allegro. I had one in 1980 , and all the babes that throw themselves at you when you own one . I got tired of women wanting me just for the car in the end . I am sure you know that one .
Evolution does not give a shzt to what you believe. It's the FACT. it happened, still happening and will be. I wonder how many people are convinced by this guy.
By the same token ,creation does not gives a shut about what you believe.
@@ericscaillet2232 yeah but creation is for retards and fanatics
Evolution is NOT a fact. It's a theory -religion one adapts due to brain damage as it cannot receive updates from its Creator-God!
Bernard Longwe he means by “fact” not scientyfic fact but “fact” like its true - the word people usually use
@@bernardlongwe7330 you really believe that theories arent true? Do you believe in 17, do you believe in the big G, do you believe in the speed of light. THEORY DOESNT MEAN NOT PROVEN. HYPOTHESIS ARE NOT PROVEN. THEORIES ARE PROVEN
"I was a high school dropout..." he still is a high school dropout. He received two *honorary* high school diplomas. To not be misleading he does have a GED though.
"The more educated I became- I have a doctorate now" ....an *honorary* doctorate of divinity. Not only is divinity completely unrelated to the sciences, but it's an honorary degree; he didn't receive any official education whatsoever.
This is just one of many examples about he gives such misleading statements and lies and runs with it as a core aspect of his arguments. It's heinous; It's disgusting. Even creationists should despite his utter dishonesty he expressed in this video.
MsHojat, do you have a link to a bio or cv supporting that? I'm very curious!
NVM, I found it: atsyouthcongress.de/de/23/sprecher/12-ayc/23-ayc/15-doug-batchelor
Far from despising his utter dishonesty, they embrace it. It brings them closer to him since creationists are the most dishonest people on the planet. Of course, you can hardly blame them. If lying and strawmanning are the only weapons in your arsenal, that's what you go with.
Kent Hovind is right in the same class as this guy. Making money spreading misinformation with "fake PhD". (Sometimes I hope there is a God and he punishes them for it. Now, wouldn't that be poetic justice!)
I totally agree, what a disgusting human being.
Oh my god this was just painful to watch! 😖 Brings back memories of all the crap I grew up listening to in my church.
Oh OK the "PhD" was " 1998 Honorary Doctor of Divinity - Southwestern Adventist University" Same sort of Doctorate as Kent Hovinds Doctor of God-ology from a trailer next to a Dominoes Pizza in Reno , or my PhD in booze and baccy from the Lamb Inn , London England . You have to be lacking in something to take pillocks like this seriously . Send us some more creationists please Achilles , they are a giggle.
LMFAO. Bravo.
***** Yes , but kudos for the dog name. The are a gazillion pubs in the UK called ," The Lamb".
It is a favourite , along with the Rose and Crown and the King`s Arms. Which part of OZ are you from ?
Australia is a seriously great place. I am going to go there when I get bored of working, and be a hippy . ( With lots of money)
Aw dont worry. Every country has religious loonies. At least he gets to live free in his natural environment , the USA Kens beard should warn people to stay away , like when a Mandril bares its teeth. Nature has provided us with an evolutionary warning system there
ilikezappa Dinah Moe Humm, Dinah Moe Humm, Who can make this Dinah Moe cum. Hehehe. Some of us remember this stuff. 8^)
Been down three hours and I aint got a crumb ......
Poetry
He's also obviously never heard of radiometric dating.
he dun belief in dat
or carbon dating or any of the dozens of ways to date things based on location/ material. what a twat. I don't pretend to understand a religion until I investigate it, unlike creationists that don't actually investigate evolution.
Sadly, the Age of the Earth was documented WELL OVER many hundreds of thousands of years, into the millions, before radiometric dating. And they still didn't get the memo... :-)
Of course he`s heard about it.
***** THEN WHY DOESNT HE ACT ON IT?!?
The missing link between the birds and the bats... *Jeezus Christ...*
I think you would have to go back to the beginnings of Permian period to find the last common ancestor of birds and bats. That's a long, looooong journey back in time. Not that any creationist will bother...
classic, not even worth answering.
Jimmi K
Jesus was also blonde, caucasian, and had blue eyes....:P
@Ron Stabler
And where did we lie exactly? Afterall, we just don't believe in any gods, just like you don't believe in Vishnu.
this is why Carl Sagan was scared of humankind.
No, he wasn't scared. Just disappointed.
Evolutionary biologists have met their burden of proof and published it for all who care to look at the evidence.
Creationists have a holy book with a description of a character inside that was created by Hebrews living in the isolation of the Sinai Desert 2000 years ago. The name of the character they created was Yaweh (YHWH) who said "I am a jealous god and you must worship, love and obey me or I will hurt you."
And here we are.
If that were true, you might have a point. But it isn't true. Burden of proof should be something which can be demonstrated not extrapolated. Especially when genetic details are problematic to the extrapation of common ancestry. And to the idea of relation by homology and embryology given the genetic data. Junk DNA is another evidence why common ancestry assumptions show evolutionary ideas as a hindrance of science. Because it was false prediction.
James Richard Wiley cuT and pasted on my living room wall
@@Jamie-Russell-CME you don't understand the science, or rather whatever person teaching you what to parrot doesn't understand the science. DNA science absolutely points to common ancestry, instead of learning science from a "holy" man maybe learn from an actual scientist or professor. You know... Someone that studies the science instead of someone that studies ancient scripture.
disproving Evolution, is not evidence for the truth of Creationism ... this is the dishonest irrationality Creationists stoop to, because they have ZERO verifiable evidence for any of their creation claims, yet think something without evidence is worthy of teaching in public school science classes.
Oh what is that burden of proof ...
A mountain of peer reviews??
7:40 We can't make life, therefore God did it! This argument is really flawed. Because it works both ways.
1. We can't create life, therefore higher intelligence created it - God.
2. We can create life, therefore intelligence is needed to create it - God.
See the problem?
No? Life needs intelligence to make it.
@Time Lord it's quite like the low probability argument. Even if the odds of life were 1 in 2, it would be God's plan..... God's plan.
All these idiots claim... "Why, just look at our highly intelligent perfectly created selves"! We just couldn't have evolved with the apes.. I call this, irreducible stupidity.
Another thing..the big Bang could not be possible with out a kickstarter, God.
God must have just poofed into existence with all of it's omniscient superpowers. WTF
Well I'm convinced. I used to believe in evolution but after listening to this guy the talking snake and the burning bush and a divine being who gets a teenaged girl pregnant (statch?) with his son so he/his son can be tortured and die so we can be forgiven is a far more logical explanation.
chuck farley lol
5:00-5:01 Creationist: "God is light"
Me: Is god a photon?
No _wonder_ we can't find him!
Watch this video of light filmed ua-cam.com/video/7Ys_yKGNFRQ/v-deo.html
@Quinzerrak lol gawd.
Doubt he ever thought evolution was true. People evolve to become more intelligent, not dumber.
he said he was a "drop out" when he was a "believer of evolution", he probably treats evolution as "just a belief" that time and never actually read and study it (or the mind to understand it DROPPED OUT remember?) and now he's a "believer of creation" thinking he made a huge progress and now using logic... please donate some hands for the possibility of my thousand facepalm..
I am 16 years old and I swear even I knew everything he was saying was bullshit 😂😂😂
There is no way people can be convinced by this
No?
you're prove of this propaganda that's going on for something less then 2 centuries,
have you ever considered the other alternatives or you just go with the flow, have you read the Bible?
HTcominthrough
Why should a fictional book written by men be of any use to anyone?
Name something so we can discuss it.
+The Truth
Actually, HTcomintrhough is being sarcastic.
I actually think there's a moment when he's quite honest. He says that the reason people who don't believe in evolution is because "they don't want to be accountable to God; they do not want to be held responsible for their actions." (It's at about the three minute mark.) Now, of course that's wrong. That's not why people believe in evolution--including a majority of Christians. But it's actually reveals why the idea of evolution is so threatening to him. He wants to believe in a system where people who believe differently than he does will suffer eternal punishment. You can find many videos where the creationist Ken Ham makes the exact same argument: you don't want to believe in God because you want to commit sin without consequence.
To an atheist, of course, this is an absurd claim. But I don't think this guy or Ken Ham, or most of these evangelists really care about converting atheists. (If so, they're certainly going about it the wrong way.) I think they're really talking to their own flock--like this guy is--telling them that evolution and atheists are dangerous and they shouldn't look too closely at the facts or they will put their souls in jeopardy.
That's not true. Nobody want to see people go to hell, but we want people to turn to Jesus so they won't go to hell since we all deserve hell. But only those who turn to God and humble themselves can be accepted and redeemed. We have all broken the Moral Law and we all know this. Many atheists don't want to conform to certain guidelines in the Bible such as sex only in the context of marriage. Look at the profane statement on the screen at 10:30 -- this would not be something he could do as a born-again Christian but there are no rules in atheism. Atheists can do anything they want and have a different sexual partner for the rest of their lives every day. But the Bible teaches that this is wrong because God is Holy and God dwells in us, and sex is beautiful but only in the context of marriage. This is why many atheists hate us and refuse to consider Jesus Christ.
I'm not saying that you (or the makers of the video) want to see people go to Hell. I'm saying that this video doesn't really try to persuade non-believers, even though that seems to be its purpose. What it says to atheists is that they don't want to believe in the Bible because they want to sin. But that's nonsense. Atheists are not perfect, but we are no bigger sinners than Christians! What is also silly is your claim that atheists think we can do anything we want or have a different sexual partner for the rest of their lives every day. Do you actually know any atheists who behave that way? I certainly don't. Even if we were only seeking our own happiness (which isn't true), this would hardly be a recipe for a happy life!
Almost all atheists live by some kind of moral code. Do some atheists commit adultery or act in ways that are sexually destructive to themselves and others? Sure. But so do Christians. The difference is that most atheists don't believe that there is anything wrong with having sex before marriage or having multiple sexual partners over our lifetimes. We see this as normal and healthy behavior. (Actually, many if not most Christians see it this way as well.) We don't think it pollutes our bodies or makes us impure, and Christians' attitudes about sex strike us as really odd.
What this video (as well as others) demonstrates is that the creationists in it do not know the first thing about what atheists believe, how we act, or why we do what we do. If they really wanted to bring atheists to Christianity, they would begin by trying to figure that out. But they don't. They are more interested in protecting their own worldview from questions or outside ideas, in "fighting off" the modern world. As I said, these videos aren't designed to reach non-Christians. They are designed to reassure Christians that only their worldview is moral and that they must resist and retreat from anyone who is different in order to protect themselves.
@@ACloserFriend you guys treat your children like slaves, a part of your holy book LITERALLY gives the monetary value of women, and it repeatedly describes incest that results in offspring. But I forgot that blowjobs between consenting, unrelated adults is WRONG and AMORAL. Maybe someday we will be saved from your arbitrarily designated rules.
Christopher
And he said "atheist think they can just live ANYWHERE!!!!" 😱
First of all, if you are using an appeal to the masses, it is a logical fallacy. Claiming that a majority accepts anything is not proof that it is true. Secondly, what do you mean by evolution? If you are using the basic definition as change over time, well that is all that you can claim. But if you claim that all of life sprang from the primordial soup, from a single-cell organism, and evolved into all living matter - well that is just a fantasy that you cannot prove, especially since we cannot observe it happening now. All we can observe is things adapting to their environment or diet, as in the finch beaks on the Galapagos islands. We have never observed a cat becoming a dog or anything to that kind of thing - it doesn't happen because it never did.
BODIES HAVE DIFFERENT GASSES AND DENSITIES.
You are right this guy is INSANE.
But so are the MORONS LISTENING TO HIM.
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THE FLOOD WAS GLOBAL.
Quite, in fact there is evidence to the contrary and is inconsistent with the physical findings of geology and palaeontology. Ignoring, for a moment the fact that this fantasy is about Genocide, perpetrated by the invisible sky pixie thingy. Firstly the size of the so called ark and it's ability to contain the multitude of species. Two of each of those species and getting to this ark thingy and back to their original world wide locations. The amount of water in the earth's atmosphere, in one form or another is pretty constant i.e. it does not evaporate into space.. There isn't enough to have covered to earth's highest mountain ranges and then return to it’s original state risking another event of similar magnitude. Even if there was the pyramids have no water damage, considering they would have been 700 years old at the time and other buildings. Then there's the question of how Noah and his family were able to re-populate the world to the population count it is today, the mathematics do not account for it, it's physically impossible. It's just another example of horseshit from the Holey Handbook of Hilarious Horseshit and Hearsay, aka The Baaabull, which would point to it being ‘Magic’ of course.
Talk about convoluted excuses and circular arguments. LMFAO
Try to calculate the amount of water it would take to flood the whole world, up to mount Everest lol i cannot imagine where it all went afterwards
@@thienle743 It would take three times as much water as there is on earth to flood the earth. The Bible is bullshit.
Creationists will grasp at any straws. I once sat through an hour for a preacher to finally come up with the answer to why the universe looks old. It was that it was made whole. Well, I certainly wish I had that wasted hour back.
Never sure with people like this, whether he genuinely believes in what he's saying or if he knows it's bollocks and is just cynically manipulating the gullible and uneducated for personal gain.
He's probably doing it for money.
BihronGaming As an Atheist and only a GED his future looked bleak or dependent on his parents. However he found possibly the only "profession" that would allow him to make a small fortune and get honorary doctorates.
I live in a constant state of fear and misery.His father was a billionaire one of the most richest man in the world.You can read his life story,,The richest cave man"I believe there is a ytube version under the some title.Just watch and then you can have understanding about who this man is.
Why do creationists always talk about Evolution?
Because talking about creationism takes about 20 seconds and short lectures/sermons don't get the money rolling in.
How long does it take to say "God Did It", "read The Book" and "Don't think too much".
That's a good question. It's the same with how some of them are obsessed with gay sex.
Gullible people are always easy convinced.
imean, thats what "gullible" means
@@ohyeahyeahimasian392 Yes, it is! That was a way to say that they are gullible.
@ Rom barker - and you are not?
The most gullible are evolution theory fans.
@@bernardlongwe7330 There are no "Evolution Theory Fans". EVOLUTION IS A FACT and the Theory of Evolutions by means of Natural selection is a Science-based theory tested and confirmed by Scientists all over the world. By the way, most religions nowadays accept Evolution, because of the overwhelming amount of evidence.If the church you go to doe not accept it, I'm sorry to tell you, but you still live in the dark ages.
Not a single intelligent argument there. On top of that, two doctors who I would never want working on me!!
Anybody wanna hear a joke?
Q) Do you know how you can tell an apologist is lying?
A) He's an apologist.
Fluent Blasphemy LOL.
john clewes Thank you, I'm here all week.
Fluent Blasphemy Good.!!!
"God is light...he began to spin the planet and that created day and night..."
How is this possible if God is in fact light and is also omnipresent?
Luckystrike pfffhahahaha
Wil Bane
Glad you liked it
He dropped out then found education and thought hmn.. how can I make money ..ooh I know I'll become a conman
Except he's telling the truth.
ACloserFriend please don't address me personally I don't comment here to illicit arguments from the diametrically opposed
Ian, I never make "illicit arguments" or did you mean "elicit"? :-) But you should not make irresponsible comments slandering other people.
ACloserFriend 👏👏👏👏 now go away
Character assassination and running away is the refuge of those who have no answer to the arguments.
“Evolutionist:” Doug! Creationist ‘logic’ is circular!
Doug Batchelor: From my point of view Evolutionist logic is circular!
“Evolutionist:” Then you are lost!
This guy, like so many other creationists dismisses the idea of evolution and talks about man evolving from monkeys. This proves beyond any doubt that he does not even understand the basics of the theory of evolution. At no stage has anybody (other than creationists) made the claim that man evolved from monkeys. What the theory says is that both man and monkey shared a common ancestor who was neither man nor monkey. If you're going to dismiss evolution it would be helpful if you could at least understand it in the first place.
andy stokes exactly. They don’t know shit about just the very basics of evolution and still try to debunk it. It’s embarrassing for them and mind boggling for people with a brain.
@@kevinbacon5492 pastor : so desperate to prove something that isn't true.
Me : says the idiot who does that with God and despises evolution with everything you believers have to care so much to wage war on non believers and that your gawd is your scientist that you blindly believe without question. Just God's slave of fear and obedience. Megatron is LORD.
Damn. There are people that actually believe this shit.
Stopping the video when he said: "Evolution is taught as a fact..." ... NO - it is taught as *theory* - a theory of evolution - and "theory" is the best what science can provide. This is why science can advance - it is dynamic and does not hold on oudated information from e.g. an ancient book.
Well, evolution is fact. The explanation of it is a theory supported by a mountain of evidence.
Actually, evolution is taught as theory AND FACT because it's both.
Why would the world's top DNA biologist Dr. Craig Venter (atheist) say these words recently at Arizona State University seminar: "I think the tree of life is an artifact of some early scientific studies that aren't really holding up."
David Henry Because Mycoplasmas code differently, so there's some question as to a single common ancestor. This actually has very little impact however, on evolution as a fact and only some on evolution as a theory.
David Henry Venter isn't saying that evolution is a faulty theory, he's saying that our understanding of the earliest evolutionary processes is probably faulty. He doubts that there is a single common ancestor, because we've identified 17 distinct genetic codes. You can't take one sentence out of context and make anything of it.
8:30 "See? When we fill in the gaps, this is what it looked like!" The irony drips thickly like pus from a gangrenous wound.
Still waiting for someone to disprove evolution with science.
Chris Pitchforth you're going to have to wait a loooong time
Population genetics and information science. Easy. Next
Time Lord lmao he’s a creationist. I bet he only barely knows what a cell is.
I'm convinced this guy's PHD is a Public High School Diploma...
setmedic You can check out his academic credentials here: atsyouthcongress.de/de/23/sprecher/12-ayc/23-ayc/15-doug-batchelor He has an honorary doctorate in divinity from Southwestern Adventist University, and an honorary BA in Theology. Even his High School Diplomas (2004 & 2010) are honorary diplomas. When he says "I was a high school dropout.... but the more educated I became..." there's no evidence that he's ever received any education at all.
Haha, or maybe PhD in this creationists title really stands for Preperation H Distributer!
+setmedic Ken Ham (former high school teacher turned Creationist preacher) doesnt have a real PhD but was given honorary doctoral degrees from four private Christian universities such as Temple Baptist College, Liberty University, Tennessee Temple University. Bullshit _certified_!
+setmedic No, his PHD is
a "Public Hatred Dilemma".
Everybody hates him when they know how to make a rightful choice.
That brings to mind one question. Are all the so called doctors in religion just honorary? And what makes an honorary degree so honorable?
Missing link.. between.. bats.. and ... birds!?! just because they have wings doesn't mean they are closely related...
Did he say they were?
Yes he said that we didn't find missing link between them. That implies that one evolved from the other.
jamie Russell
You really don't like evolution, do you? May I ask why?
My native language is spanish (there is a context, so i have to clarify). I had a series of discussions with a friend on facebook, he has always been on the short side of education (he lived in Mexico when i met him, we were co-workers). He was a satanist back then. Then i found out that he was in jail, though not exactly sure why, nor i care. Anyways, he moved to the US, became a christian and began posting stupid stuff. The discussions were mostly me correcting him.
So once, he told me about a pastor (Alducin is his last name if i recall correctly) that destroyed evolutionary theory and that i should watch the video. The pastor claimed in the video that scientist claimed that evolution has been going on for about 50 billion years...........500 000 000 000 years of evolution..... The good thing is that he said that in the opening minutes. When some one says that, you cannot take seriously the rest. It was obvious he had no idea what he was talking about, so i did not watched the rest, but probably that pastor beats this one in stupidity.
Can anyone find a single thing this guy said that is true?
That line about his education is priceless. "The more educated I became, I have a doctorate now..."
This guy is a high school dropout period. OK, he got a GED. Check this out from his own bio in the link in the description.
College
1998 Honorary Doctor of Divinity - Southwestern Adventist University
1998 Honorary Bachelor of Arts in Theology - Union College
High School
GED Certificate
2004 Honorary High School Diploma from Monterey Bay Academy
2010 Honorary High School Diploma from Cedar Lake Adventist Academy
Notice the dates. He got his *honorary* "doctorate" before he got his honorary HS diplomas. Wow, he had a *honorary* "doctorate" but still needed to get not one, but two Honorary HS diplomas, 12 years later. I am so impressed.
The really sad part is that anyone would actually believe this fool.
Warren Lauzon Over 60% of Americans think like him....America is sad
midas1212444 The numbers are skewed. When doing the survey, the questions where worded in such a way as to give a desired outcome. The real number is around 25%, but its still way more than an educated society should reflect.
D Bartkowski That is true - almost like asking "are you in favor of world peace" on a survey. :P
I looked at those "credentials" none of them are convincing
Education
College
1998 Honorary Doctor of Divinity - Southwestern Adventist University
1998 Honorary Bachelor of Arts in Theology - Union College
High School
GED Certificate
2004 Honorary High School Diploma from Monterey Bay Academy
2010 Honorary High School Diploma from Cedar Lake Adventist Academy
+Peter Hortensius - What, you aren't impressed by a high school dropout presenting himself as a "doctor" and through false and misleading presentation to an equally ignorant audience, presumes to overturn the knowledge developed by the finest and most educated minds in their specific field of expertise?
But wait! A vet and an MD in the audience came on stage and confessed they are creationists, so it must be true! No offense to medical professionals, but that's like an electronics technician being taken as an authority on particle physics.
+Steely McBeam 😂 best analogy ever.
Steely McBeam if a real vet and md talk to them. They gonna say if you believe on something that's not even real while being a vet and a md. Then you should give up your job as a vet and as a md cause you believe something that is not real.
Peter Hortensius Bravo, bro.
Joshua Ciresoli yup. Doug bache is a fraud and yet people listen to him well most of them were like him. If those who listen were scientist (real ones) they either left or they critize him for what he's saying cause everything he's saying is wrong.
do his audience have any critical thinking faculties? he could tell them the earth is flat and we all come from a planet called Krypton. would they believe?
He is definitely an expert on what’s “forged in the bowels!” 🤪😂🤣
This guys never heard of carbon dating
Shrill_ you’ve never heard of uranium or potassium dating
i have heard all of that, in fact, i knew a guy who dated uranium last friday, he said "god she was so HOT".
this pastor will probably date onyl uranus xD
People like this just poo poo carbon dating or any other method that they purposely choose to stay ignorant about or even worse, preach that these methods are a conspiracy by scientists to disprove God.
But I have heard of the other guy's wife dating.
This guy is unbelievable. It just demonstrates what I've thought for a long time. To creationists, the 9th Commandment is an optional extra.
He's madder than a mad hatter. Zeus only knows why these people are so stupid. Firstly, the burden of proof is on the creationist, NOT on the scientists. Science has proven itself over and over and over again.
Excellent point, my friend, Craig And Joe!
Go Science!
😊👍
+Craig And Joe Hey Craig/Joe my partner in defending the world from ignorance on youtube at least :P
+Craig And Joe Ya they like to change it and say we have the burden of proof because they use the term evidence in the law sense, not the scientific sense then try to amalgamate the two, as if they are equal. Yes it will always be on the religious until evidence in the scientific definition is put forward. Rest is speculation and hearsay.
raig And Joe
4 months ago
He's madder than a mad hatter. Zeus
only knows why these people are so stupid. Firstly, the burden of proof
is on the creationist, NOT on the scientists. Science has proven itself
over and over and over again.
Has this guy ever heard of carbon dating? Lmao
...and the great many other, more reliable, means to date things.
Carbon dating isn't always accurate so scientists use a combination of different dating techniques when they figure out how old something is.
Has the carbon dating technique been tested for accuracy over and over a period of 1000 years? No-o--o---o----o! Then how do they measure billions of years? Imaginations!
Actually scientists dont use carbon dating much anymore. They use radiometric dating. Which is accurate as fuck and tells us like what million years ago they lived
@@bernardlongwe7330 that is not proving it is wrong. By your logic, we cant say anything in the universe is a constant, like the big G or the speed of light or the 17. Because we didnt test them over over very long time to see if they stand constant
I believe the banana man is the worst one lmao, that's shit was funny.
Clayton Martin but look how perfect this artificially selected for banana fits in my hands
Clayton Martin He's the worst because he goes up to people on the streets and uses manipulative wording to convince them they're going to be tortured for eternity
@@livaozolina5061 god is evil
The missing link between Humans and primates... Banana. It fits so perfectly in the mouth... of both 😂 I think they're all on the samr level of willful ignorance.
Fits perfectly where?
Theofanis Lantzakis just ignore it
this comment is satire
@@theofanislantzakis9869 Heh heh heh. It fits in their butts. Heh heh heh heh...
This guy is seriously a Doctor of Divinity?? WTF??? Is that an actual thing?
+alienincognito Yup, just ask any psychiatric ward patient...
This is just comedy gold...there stupidity could be felt for miles that day..creating the southern state's...
Doug Bachelor's "Education"
College
1998 Honorary Doctor of Divinity - Southwestern Adventist University
1998 Honorary Bachelor of Arts in Theology - Union College
High School
GED Certificate
2004 Honorary High School Diploma from Monterey Bay Academy
2010 Honorary High School Diploma from Cedar Lake Adventist Academy
Charles Darwins Education
College Degrees.... Christs Church College... Theology
Seems Kent Hovind and Doug Bachelor has more Degrees than Darwin did.
Jay Wendt Darwin DID spend alot of his time in "prison". He was mentally ill by his own words. 9[sic] and medical doctor George Pickering, in an extensive study of Darwin's illness, concluded that in his early thirties, Darwin became an "invalid recluse" (1974, p. 34). UCLA School of Medicine Professor Dr. Robert Pasnau (1990, p. 123) noted that Darwin also "remained ill almost continually" for the entire five years that he was on his HMS Beagle trip.... so Darwin was unable to leave his house for most of his life ...just like a "prison". [sic] Darwin's many psychological or psychologically influenced physical health symptoms included severe depression, insomnia, hysterical crying, dying sensations, shaking, fainting spells, muscle twitches, shortness of breath, trembling, nausea, vomiting, severe anxiety, depersonalization, seeing spots, treading on air and vision, and other visual hallucinations (Barloon and Noyes, 1997, p. 139..) seems people have decided to follow a self described Loon at best. He also stated he received great joy and excitement at killing living things. Gee... glad they didnt have assault rifles back then. ( "The Illness of Charles Darwin." The American Journal of Medicine 65(4):572-574.)
He also suffered from extreme acne and had severe farting spells.... sounds kinda like Alfred E Neuman from Mad Magazine.
p.s. there have been three books written on Darwins mental health or lack there of. I dont fault Darwin for his illnesses but do question people that follow the teachings of a hallucinating, known psychopath and then knock a seemingly healthy, rational and logical guy like Mr Bachelor ..
TommyJay Except Darwins degrees were not honorary.
And Darwin actually went out and helped establish one of the most important scientific theories in Biology.
Jay Wendt To paraphrase an old quote, "In the land of the witless, the dimwit is king.", or something like that. Yes, there _are_ people even stupider than Mr. Bachelor and they all think he's a real rational and logical guy. You should hear what they think of Kent Hovind or William Lane Craig. Rubes and hayseeds are easily impressed. That's why they're rubes.
Jay Wendt First you have to recognize that there are Christians, and there are Christians. Personally, I border on being an anti-theist, but even I won't say that intelligence and theism are mutually exclusive. That has nothing to do with the kind of people who believe the likes of Hovind, Comfort, etc.. Those people are mostly average or below average in intelligence, but mainly they're woefully uneducated and, more importantly, so invested in their beliefs that anyone who reinforces them, no matter how much the clown, is instantly granted authority and credibility.
An intelligent theist will find rational, reasonable ways to reconcile his faith with reality. It's not difficult and millions do it. A moron will cling to a literal translation of the bible and indulge in a hyper state of confirmation bias, absorbing anything he can find to assure him that his myths aren't as ridiculous as they sound. The stupid thing is not indulging in confirmation bias. To them, that's spiritual self-defense, so it's perfectly reasonable. The stupid thing is that they've conflated their salvation and the literal accuracy of what would be considered a very shabby document by the standards of serious historians. They've painted themselves into a corner.
Imagine yourself in their shoes. You *must* literally believe in and defend the creation myth, the flood myth, Jonah and the whale, etc.. Everyone outside your church thinks you're an imbecile for believing fairy tales. 98% of the most intelligent, accomplished scientists in the world think you're a moron. The more educated people become, the more they think you're a superstitious fool. What would you do? You'd search around for someone to tell you that *you* have it right and everyone else will burn in hell. You'd buy into conspiracies among scientists to disprove god and make us all atheists. You'd believe universities existed to spread the atheist world view, hide evidence against evolution and for god and on and on and on.... Because if you _don't_ believe these things, your whole world will come crashing down around your ears under the weight of tangible reality. You won't get a do-over on your shitty life. You'll never see Grandma or Fluffy again. There's no Special Snowflake chair with your name on it in heaven. You'll have no reason to act decently and you'll become an immoral animal, just like the scientists said you were. You'll probably slit your own throat out of despair, after raping the girl next door because that's what godless people do.
So what do you do? You must defend yourself. You seek out charlatans skilled at telling you what you desperately must hear. You ridicule those more educationally accomplished than yourself, preferably with bible verses admonishing against knowledge. You deny or ignore anything that doesn't comport with scripture and unconditionally accept as fact anything that does. And, most importantly, you abandon or re-define reason and logic, abusing them beyond recognition in order to maintain your delusions of personal immortality. And you lie. And you quote mine, and you lie some more. The best biblical literalists earn membership to the Liars-For-Jebus© Club.
"Scientists never found the missing link between the bats and the birds" If that's not dumb, I don't know what is...
Sure it is. They don't know anything.
😞 Some preachers need to be put in jail
“I don’t see how any African-American could believe in evolution”
*Neil Degrasse Tyson enters the chat*
In 1998 he was awarded both his Bachelor and Doctorate degree, ridiculous.
"I grew up believing in evolution... but as I got older, I realized I could make SO MUCH MORE money spreading the word of Christ."
why are we still diuscussing this? Evolution is no longer a theory... and creationism has been discredited 200 years ago... beyond me!
Agreed.
Maxwell Power Rubbish, Any theory sufficiently proven beyond any reasonable doubt qualifies to be recognised as a scientific FACT,hence the subject is taught in thousands of schools/colleges the world over.
Maxwell Power , john clewes is absolutely right... and did nothing but to state the obvious... a theory who has been verified by centuries of confirming experiments and masses of concurring evidence, leaves the realm of theory to become a law. (.i.e.: Law of Gravity, Atomic Laws, ...).
john clewes
Wrong. Please google what a scientific theory is. First you have the facts. Then you construct a hypothesis to explain the facts. If the hypothesis meets scrutiny from hundreds of scientists who will try to disprove you, it will qualify as theory and be taught in schools.
Evolution is true but evolutionary theory will always be evolutionary theory just as atomic theory and gravitational theory will always be theories. Scientific theories are the best and highest bodies of knowledge in science.
Reasons why there is no god:
1) Life does not need to have a meaning.
2) All religions are shaped by the culture of that specific geografical area hence any god is made in the image of people: this means that god is just in your brain.
3) You just follow your family's religion as you were indoctrinated from the very beginning of your life. Your family was indoctrinated by their parents and so on until the days when religious education was mandatory.
So, this much depends on the area where you were born. Basically what you know does not exist: it has just been told you to believe in it since when you were young and not able to do a critic about life.
4) If religion books were cancelled, they would have re-written differently (e.g. would a re-written version of the Bible - the word of god - describe that sun goes around the earth nowadays?).
Instead, if scientific researches were cancelled they would have re-written in the same way cause they are based on objective evidence.
5) 4,200 religions in the world: how do you prove yours is the true one and on which evidence you discredit the others?
6) The most popular religions just coincide with the most dominant/rich/colonialist countries as they were spread by force/political influence
7) When people could not cure themselves they relied on witchcraft. Once science found the cure, witchcraft got extinguished. By analogy, religion works in the same way as witchcraft as it is just an irrational method of compensation for material life problems and it disappears when issues are fixed materially. Religion just gives you the illusion to obtain something that you will never get.
8) If you say "what was there before universe?", then I say, "what was there before god" ?
9) It has already been demonstrated by science that organic matter can be generated by inorganic matter (check the Miller-Urey experiment)
10) Big bang: explosion which determined life and continuous spreading of energy nowadays. Human production/reproduction is just an expression of that energy keeps spreading. Before the big bang there was neither space nor time, hence a god couldn't exist.
Extra point: We are all here discussing because of CONSCIOUSNESS.
Humans are the only ones who are provided with CONSCIOUSNESS in such a way that they can think, plan, construct even under long-term outlooks.
CONSCIOUSNESS is therefore a system of defence to better allow our survival and it is the result of an evolved brain which took millions of years to develop to this level: it's not a gift of God...
Please feed consciousness with reasoning instead of superstitions and useless beliefs because it is thanks to this defensive system that we have finally managed to understand how we came here. The rest is just faith...
And if you all stop preaching you might have to do an honest days work.
It's much easier to fool people than it is to convince them they have been fooled. Mark Twain.
Its just easier to believe in magic. You can fill in the gaps easily
Ugh....hard not to vomit!
Just let it happen. You'll feel better!
@@donbacker9883 🤒🤢🤮
Scientists in China breed healthy mice from two females!
Researchers in China say they've bred healthy mice with two mothers using a new type of gene editing technology, a significant feat that may help researchers better understand mammalian reproduction but carries significant ethical and safety questions.
A total of 29 bi maternal mice were produced using 210 embryos in the study. They all were "normal, lived to adulthood, and had babies of their own," though they showed "some defective features," according to researchers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
But not all the mice pups survived the experiment. Mice produced from two fathers only survived a couple of days after being born.
"This research shows us what's possible,"
How History Could Be Reshaped So what do all these new findings and dates mean for mankind’s history? The article published yesterday in the journal Nature, points out clearly that the modern dating techniques could shed light on the emergence of early humans and their coexistence with ancient wildlife on the Australian continent. The question is: Could this discovery truly reshape history? The answer is yes! Ultimately, the findings also indicated that Homo sapiens' predecessors, Neanderthals and Denisovans, coexisted with humans for much longer than we originally thought, since the new research pretty much suggests that Australia was occupied almost 20,000 years before the first humans arrived in Europe. This shows a much more important role for Australia in the shaping of human history. The research is expected to receive a lot of criticism since the scientific topics of discussion it opens are too many and too important. Dispute Appears to be Over The site was last excavated back in the 1980s. Back then it was believed to be between 50,000 and 60,000 years old. However, these dates had been disputed by several archaeologists and in order to settle the dispute for once and for all, Dr. Clarkson and his colleagues returned to the site in 2012 and 2015, armed with more advanced technology and techniques this time. Excavation at the site took place only after the local Gundjeihmi Aboriginal Corporation representing the traditional owners, gave permission to the researchers. Next, as Phys Org mentions , labs in Australia used a combination of radiocarbon dating and a technique called luminescence dating (to examine the newly found artifacts), which can show accurately when single grains of sand were last exposed to sunlight, to determine the age of the sediment surrounding the artifacts. The results indicated the lower layers were around 65,000 years old, changing the original date significantly. To be sure that the dates were correct, Professor Jacobs of the University of Wollongong sent four samples to the University of Adelaide for independent testing. The results were the same as ABC News reports .
"Through aerial imagery, we can see that Adani have cleared vegetation, put in roads, put in permanent infrastructure to impact our groundwater at a time of great drought and climate change. Adani have put at risk the sensitive, ONE-MILLION-YEAR-OLD springs by doing this illegal activity."
I love how he says he there is no proof of evolution, but when asked to prove creationism you have to just have faith and believe it because the god did it.
This dude just proved evolution!!! By contrast, he never evolved!
I think the worst creationist is pretty much whoever the last creationist you listened to is.
+FrankLightheart Hah! Good one! :D
Who would have guessed that archaeologists lose funding if they don't find things, i.e do their job.
Then creationists should lose their funding until they can produce a talking snake.
He says that evolutionists are motivated by money. I suppose then, that everybody in that auditorium got in for free and he never passes a collection plate around either.
Faith : firm belief in something for which there is no proof
+Joe Grodis does that make atheism a faith?
+Michael Trevathan No. Atheism is the rejection of claims, not a claim itself. You cannot have faith in something without a claim.
ReactedTugBoat Ok, but then what is the difference between agnosticism and atheism?
atheism
play
noun athe·ism \ˈā-thē-ˌi-zəm\
Definition of atheism
1archaic : ungodliness, wickedness
2a : a disbelief in the existence of deityb : the doctrine that there is no deity
1
agnostic
play
noun ag·nos·tic \ag-ˈnäs-tik, əg-\
Simple Definition of agnostic
: a person who does not have a definite belief about whether God exists or not
: a person who does not believe or is unsure of something
Source: Merriam-Webster's Learner's Dictionary
Examples: agnostic in a sentence
Editor's note: How agnostic Differs from atheist
Full Definition of agnostic
1: a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (as God) is unknown and probablyunknowable; broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or thenonexistence of God or a god
2: a person who is unwilling to commit to an opinion about something
ReactedTugBoat Remember that a position held firmly is a position, regardless of what it is named. Atheism is a position that there is no god. Atheism is not the position that we cannot know if there is a god or not and sits on the fence about the issue. Atheism takes a very firm stance about the existence of a god, and does so without evidence. Therefore, it is a religion because it rejects logic and reason and substitutes those with faith.
+Michael Trevathan Atheism isn't absolute, atheism consists of ranges of agnosticism. But either way, a religion such as Christianity is only denouncing one less religion than atheism. Why should Christianity be the absolute true religion when there are hundreds of others claiming also to be true?
Maybe a god exists, but he is certainly NOT in the form that any of the holy scriptures of any existing religion depict it him as.
I can't count the lies this guy tells. But at least he's going to heaven,,,
How was he not even nominated for a Golden Crocoduck?
No such place, unless you can prove otherwise!
John Benton Sarcasm?
6:10 yeah circular reasoning, tell me about that, you must know it very well lmao