This is kind of a missed opportunity. The real risk isn't in general use of AI- it's in the development of new weaponry. This technology will innovate, and is currently innovating, a plethora of bioweapons. Realistically, why go through the effort of destroying infrastructure when you can systematically eradicate your enemies, making them hyper-contagious to each other; all while the same AI can vaccinate your troops against it? You could've talked about the real, world-changing threats- this video largely talks about new tech guiding old tech, and not new tech creating new tech. It feels dishonest to label this video's contents as the danger
AI is a black box and there is no way to assign accountability with neural networks. When humans will not be needed to confirm AI's actions, who would take the responsibility if something bad happens?
It never ceases to amaze me just how much effort humans put into finding new and improved ways to kill each other. Effort that could be better directed toward improving our species. I know some of you will call me naive. IDC!
It’s not about finding more and more efficient ways to kill each other, that’s somewhat expected with the advancement of technology. What’s actually disturbing is that military application seems to be THE main reason that incentivizes people to develop more advanced technology, rather than a more righteous cause like gaining knowledge or improving people’s lives.
@@faroob What do you mean? AI spots a blurry cat photo faster than its cant spot tank or missile. It’s easier to recognize a tank than some messed-up photo
I saw the first widespread use of drone-warfare by ISIS in Iraq, during the Battle of Mosul in '17, when I was in the Army. My commander told us, "Wait till they start putting AI in those quad-copters. Everything will change."
This was an extremely informative video! Stephen Hawking predicted this many years ago, and he said “in the future AI could develop a will of its own, a will that is in conflict with ours.” “The rise of powerful AI will be either the best, or the worst thing, ever to happen to humanity. We do not yet know which." Until this day these predictions kinda remain true. Ai is very much a double-edged sword.
At what point do advances in warfare guarantee our self destruction? Feels increasingly like we should be looking to use AI to prevent wars instead of fighting them.
When i first see AI crammed inside a humanoid robot soldier with speed, strength, endurance, and armament far beyound a human soldier, who has been given autonomy and ability to kill... That is when I poop a brick. Violating 3 laws of robotics is bad bad juju.
Brother that is the theory of deterrence. The only way to prevent an enemy from attacking you is by scaring them away & that why we are building AI systems. It’s one giant game of geopolitical game theory that forces us to create more and more powerful and destructive weapons. MAD is what stopped nuclear war and is what’s gonna stop an Ai war. It’s a sad state of affairs but it’s the truth
The way you have your guest, whos videocalling in, set up a B and a C camera is so extra and a great way to up the polish on your videos. Honestly, if you just used the screen recording of the conversation noone would complain. Its the standard we're all used to. But you took it to another level. Bravo to the production team.
It always genuinely excites me to see channels implementing more 3D animations, particularly in 4K! I'm not going to ask you when you're going to export in 60fps though, because I know it's rhetorical, lol.
I've used battle management software and forces that don't use some form of it, are in the middle ages. At a glance you can see where the friendlies are, the points of interest and enemy positions that have been identified. So everyone can see all the time if a new target is acquired. That by itself is a game changer and many armies in the world don't do it. EW is a consideration as it'll limit the capabilities. But a lot better have it than not.
warfare first, day to day second. Imagine having something like that assisting governments in mobilizing resources, ensuring efficiency. limits will be key :)
Johnny taking the time to point out any potential conflicts of interest real or perceived and the lengths he goes to get it right is an oasis in a sea of lazy journalism. He’s the future or restoring trust to journalism.
I understand this is going to sound a little nitpicky, but even though the video explained the concepts well, a lot of the steps aren't actually AI-just good digital knowledge management. The distinction becomes important because NVIDIA, a U.S. company, currently has some amount of control over AI hardware, whereas most of the hardware and sensors are far more widely available in China.
Bro, a human army going up against a human + AI army is like bringing a knife to a drone fight. The AI-backed side would have instant intel, laser-precise strikes, and bots that don’t get tired, scared, or make dumb mistakes. Meanwhile, the regular humans are still out here dealing with fatigue, miscommunication, and slow decision-making. It’s basically Call of Duty on veteran mode, but the AI team has aimbot.
whether AI is present or not, to avoid from being targeted, is to avoid detection (visual, heat, movement, noise, etc.). AI speed up decision making and making recommendations from various sensors/data input.
12:06 you both fail to mention that it is a probability they are Hamas, a score based on connections this person has, they wait for them to go home then bomb the building, not the apartment. THE ENTIRE BUILDING. Best part, they called it “where’s daddy”.
The IDF has a much higher likelihood of killing civilians and labelling them H4mas, especially given their track record. So yes, it's definitely plausible they are testing their AI by killing innocent civilians. I mean, who other than the bloody untrustworthy Palestinians will verify if they were Hamas or not, or even who gave the IDF the right to kill ppl whose land they occupy and are now concentrated into an open air prison.
The IDF has a much higher likelihood of killing civilians and labelling them H4mas, especially given their track record. So yes, it's definitely plausible they are testing their AI by killing innocent civilians. I mean, who other than the bloody untrustworthy Palestinians will verify if they were Hamas or not, or even who gave the IDF the right to kill ppl whose land they occupy and are now concentrated into an open air prison.
We are very close to world leaders having gaming PCs in their offices attached to armies of robots. Where routinely countries in respect to their capabilities are just gonna endlessly drone strike each other with smart phone apps The easier war becomes the more often it will be used. Power for thousands of years was limited by logistic resources and manpower. Ai and drones replace both of those things.
There's all of this talk about that final moment, the final lethal decision needing to be made by a human. What about mines and other human/RF/heat activated IEDs etc? they're often set up weeks, months or even years+ in advance from when the enemy force/invaders etc are expected to make their way through that specific area. That surely is even more separated from the conscious and thought out act of taking that executive decision to end that combatant's life? (Or civilian, car, dog, livestock, curious child in the case of mines)
If AI is programmed to limit casualties - if its goal is to keep humans alive at all cost - game changer - you have to change the GOAL of the game - as long as the GOAL is to win - AI will try to win at all costs including LYING to humans
While I found this fascinating I could not help but be reminded of the Millennium Challenge. It was a war game in which Blue Team was given tons of informational and tactical advantages while Red Team was handicapped. The problem was Blue Team had so much information that they could not identify what was actually useful. While AI has an extreme capacity for processing information it is trained on previous examples meaning AI tends to inherit our biases and flaws. Most predictive models work on fewer bits of information than we think. In war too much information can be just as deadly as too little.
After complaining for years about the overly loud background music of Mr. Harriss' videos, I feel obliged now to say that the volume of the music has reached a level which makes listening to Mr. Harris much more pleasant. Thanks Mr. Harris.
AI maybe the way, An AI army versus a human army is a complex matchup with potential advantages for both sides. AI boasts tireless soldiers with lightning-fast reflexes and precision, potentially reducing human casualties and adapting quickly to changing battlefields. However, ethical concerns, vulnerability to hacking, and limitations in human-like judgment pose significant challenges. Ultimately, the outcome would depend on the AI's sophistication, the nature of the conflict, and strategic deployment, making it a multifaceted confrontation with no easy answers.
'At what point do advances in warfare guarantee our self destruction? Feels increasingly like we should be looking to use AI to prevent wars instead of fighting them....
Boston dynamic is not american comapny, own by Hyundai korean most of their chip is made by Samsung, Google willow is just a myth. So American empire is end
AI can help us as a society advance much faster but at same time many people will lose jobs, it will lead to higher crime rates, more poverty etc. If they give AI a 'conscience' that's where this could go all 'Terminator Judgement Day mode'. Definitely needs to be restrictions in which AI is and isn't used
"if you recognize a cat you can recognize a tank" shashank joshi "if you can dodge a wrench you can dodge a ball" Patches O'Houlihan sorry it popped into my head and i had to post it lol
I know plenty of fiction likes to explore when these military robots go berserk and go against their masters. I’m not worried about that. I’m worried that if military becomes mostly autonomous, a bad leader / dictator can easily become ruthless and indefinitely maintain absolute control. Before autonomous killer robots, dictators need to have some buy in from a number of people, be it the generals and soldiers. I feel the second scenario is much more likely and possible in the near future.In an AI war, everything boils down to data. * 2 years ago ,OpenAI has hired around 1,000 remote contractors in regions such as Eastern Europe and Latin America over the past 6 months. The company is building a dataset that includes not only lines of code, but also the human explanations behind them written in natural language. If you can replace a team of 10 high priced engineers with a team of 3 and AI that’s a massive cost savings.*
The problem with AI is that it is based on algoritmic rules. If you know the rules you can influence it. For example, if you working on border control scanning on forbidden liquides. Someone put liquid in packages of flowers eveytime again and again. Then the algorithm gives a higher probability on flowers. Then when doing a bunch of liquid the smoggler puts it at a bunch of bananas, the algorithm will see the probability as low. As long you know algoritms, you can infleunce them. The art example where they put 1000 phones on a street in Paris so Google maps made alternative routes, so the street emptyied up, is the best example.
Hey! I’m excited that you show palantir on here. I’ve been an investor since they went public. Fair question on if it’s safe or ethical. Palantir has safeguards in place for just this reason. Palantir realized years ago that the solution human and ai working together to come to a conclusion because there are something humans a better at and should have control over. And other the a computer/ai will be better at. I enjoyed the video :)
AI has not got there yet, i just asked Chat-GPT that my hob was not working, its answer was that the pan might not be the right pan to use with my hob :( I turned off the power to my hob and on again and it fixed the issue :) AI is good but until it has imagination its still just a tool
"That's not a howitzer, it's just a very big banana, cancelling firing sequence." - an AI, at some point in time A little after someone walks into a bar and orders -7 lizards in beer glasses probably.
Tolkien would be sick at the use of his names on these weapons. It just shows the sorts of people who totally miss the point and continue to profit from destruction. The irony is staggering.
This is an intriguing business model. On one hand the empire has technological supremacy, AI, most advanced arms, on the other hand, it is funding needless wars, indiscriminate civilian killings, countless genocide, regime change, fuelling conflicts and at the same time not being accountable for anything! I’m so eager to see how sustainable this business model is! And how long the empire remains on the driving seat!
Idk why they haven't just been putting bioweapons on those tiny drones yet. The drones can be small af and can get into anywhere as well as being neigh untraceable. Like what's stopping a drone or swarm of drones with no distinguishable markings from just buzzing into a town/village and dusting it with some nerve agent or bioweapon? It get's rid of all of the human targets in the town while leaving the buildings and utilities intact.
The Rus-Ukraine war has demonstrated how advantageous utilizing drones and smart technology can be on a modern battlefield, it's this weird hybrid war of trech/small strike teams and mass drone assaults. 30 million dollar tanks being disabled by a 2000 dollar drone or submarine drones destroying battleships. War evolves
Johnny Harris didn't have him on... He stole from someone elses interview with Shashank Joshi and tried to make it look like his own. Notice the censored titles throughout the video. He has done this before! When you learn how scummy Johnny Harris is, you will never believe another of his videos!!
Johnny Harris didn't have him on... He stole from someone elses interview with Shashank Joshi and tried to make it look like his own. Notice the censored titles throughout the video. He has done this before! When you learn how scummy Johnny Harris is, you will never believe another of his videos!!
I cant help but remember that video about AI-controlled slaughterbots 6 years ago: ua-cam.com/video/9fa9lVwHHqg/v-deo.html&ab_channel=ALTER. I am not saying that AI is evil and dangerous, but rather with Johnny's video, AI assisted warfare is starting to become a reality, or at least the first stepping stone. It is now up to mankind to use this power for good and to control this power, before it goes out of control and unstoppable Slaughterbots that can decimate anyone they please become a true reality.
Take the quiz to find your perfect trainer and get 14 days of free training here: go.trainwell.net/johnnyharris
This is kind of a missed opportunity. The real risk isn't in general use of AI- it's in the development of new weaponry.
This technology will innovate, and is currently innovating, a plethora of bioweapons. Realistically, why go through the effort of destroying infrastructure when you can systematically eradicate your enemies, making them hyper-contagious to each other; all while the same AI can vaccinate your troops against it?
You could've talked about the real, world-changing threats- this video largely talks about new tech guiding old tech, and not new tech creating new tech. It feels dishonest to label this video's contents as the danger
AI is a black box and there is no way to assign accountability with neural networks. When humans will not be needed to confirm AI's actions, who would take the responsibility if something bad happens?
Putin: Control AI and you'll control the world
Also Putin: WW1 trench warfare
Both Russia and Ukraine are using trenches.
Russia just needs to hold. They’ve control 1/4 of Ukraine. A deal anytime soon is a L for Ukraine
Just like in animatrix when the human hide in trenches
That only shows it's not easy to implement... Most of the things talked about are hypothetical
Next up- AI creates AI to defeat other AIs using humans. Darwin's Loop completed!
The worst thing about AI war is that its much easier to kill, when you are not the one bashing the skulls of enemies.
Same thing happened with firearms and strategic bombers
That's the gun powder years ago.
I'm running to Africa no war there
It never ceases to amaze me just how much effort humans put into finding new and improved ways to kill each other. Effort that could be better directed toward improving our species. I know some of you will call me naive. IDC!
Well Si vis pacem, para bellum of course
It’s not about finding more and more efficient ways to kill each other, that’s somewhat expected with the advancement of technology. What’s actually disturbing is that military application seems to be THE main reason that incentivizes people to develop more advanced technology, rather than a more righteous cause like gaining knowledge or improving people’s lives.
Hi, the music in this episode came from our catalog. Thanks Johnny!
We got AI army before GTA 6
I would dead before GTA 6 💀😂
At this point we’ll be getting the heat death of the universe before GTA 6
AI, mostly Xaitonium, is more far than most think. This will be a strong year in so many ways lol
Wtf this is everywhere
America and Israel are the main problem of this world.
When was this released?
Sure, he said all the time he won't do it and now he did
Elon is just a different built guy
5:42 if you can recognize a cat, you can recognize a tank
This line feels weird but makes total sense
It sounds like 'if you can dodge a wrench you can dodge a ball' logic
Not technicly true
@@faroobwhy it makes sense as if a ai is able to recognise a cat it should be able to recognise other objects as well ?
@@faroob What do you mean? AI spots a blurry cat photo faster than its cant spot tank or missile. It’s easier to recognize a tank than some messed-up photo
If it wasnt trained on any data with tanks in it, it dosent know what a tank looks like
Aside from military contractors, no one wins an arms race.
Exactly
Every year that passes, we are closer and closer to getting something like Skynet, and boy it is happening.
America already has something called Sentient AI in our low flying satellites - we are already there
or AM.
@@CBTenthusiast-lc6sn hell nah.
I saw the first widespread use of drone-warfare by ISIS in Iraq, during the Battle of Mosul in '17, when I was in the Army. My commander told us, "Wait till they start putting AI in those quad-copters. Everything will change."
equalizer in terms of striking precision.
“Wisdom and foresight for the leaders in charge”. Ha… good one
This was an extremely informative video! Stephen Hawking predicted this many years ago, and he said “in the future AI could develop a will of its own, a will that is in conflict with ours.” “The rise of powerful AI will be either the best, or the worst thing, ever to happen to humanity. We do not yet know which." Until this day these predictions kinda remain true. Ai is very much a double-edged sword.
Yeah it was for told in a story including Sara Conner.
Movies have shown us this ends badly every single time. E.g Eagle eye, I, Robot, Stealth etc.
At what point do advances in warfare guarantee our self destruction? Feels increasingly like we should be looking to use AI to prevent wars instead of fighting them.
There's no money in peace. Capitalism, functioning as intended.
That doesn’t make as much money silly
That doesn't help Israel become Greater Israel and dominate the middle east though.
When i first see AI crammed inside a humanoid robot soldier with speed, strength, endurance, and armament far beyound a human soldier, who has been given autonomy and ability to kill... That is when I poop a brick.
Violating 3 laws of robotics is bad bad juju.
Brother that is the theory of deterrence. The only way to prevent an enemy from attacking you is by scaring them away & that why we are building AI systems. It’s one giant game of geopolitical game theory that forces us to create more and more powerful and destructive weapons. MAD is what stopped nuclear war and is what’s gonna stop an Ai war. It’s a sad state of affairs but it’s the truth
One day Stargate would become skynet
America already has something called Sentient AI in our low flying satellites - already here
The way you have your guest, whos videocalling in, set up a B and a C camera is so extra and a great way to up the polish on your videos.
Honestly, if you just used the screen recording of the conversation noone would complain. Its the standard we're all used to.
But you took it to another level.
Bravo to the production team.
*Mankind VS Terminator 💀*
It always genuinely excites me to see channels implementing more 3D animations, particularly in 4K!
I'm not going to ask you when you're going to export in 60fps though, because I know it's rhetorical, lol.
I've used battle management software and forces that don't use some form of it, are in the middle ages.
At a glance you can see where the friendlies are, the points of interest and enemy positions that have been identified. So everyone can see all the time if a new target is acquired.
That by itself is a game changer and many armies in the world don't do it. EW is a consideration as it'll limit the capabilities. But a lot better have it than not.
Shashank could be an perfect actor for a typical Weapons dealer villain in Hollywood...
and we thought they were overacting!
"if you can recognize a cat, you can recognize a tank" actually had me giggle for some reason
A cat tank😮
tank camouflaged as cat.
Might be my favorite channel on UA-cam
warfare first, day to day second. Imagine having something like that assisting governments in mobilizing resources, ensuring efficiency. limits will be key :)
The military always has a premium on government funds. "Chief, if we don't have enough money, our entire country will cease to exist".
11:20 i think the AI was a little bit bias
Johnny taking the time to point out any potential conflicts of interest real or perceived and the lengths he goes to get it right is an oasis in a sea of lazy journalism. He’s the future or restoring trust to journalism.
I understand this is going to sound a little nitpicky, but even though the video explained the concepts well, a lot of the steps aren't actually AI-just good digital knowledge management. The distinction becomes important because NVIDIA, a U.S. company, currently has some amount of control over AI hardware, whereas most of the hardware and sensors are far more widely available in China.
Hey Johnny! Thanks for letting us know about Espresso!
Can anybody say... SkyNet?
Bro, a human army going up against a human + AI army is like bringing a knife to a drone fight. The AI-backed side would have instant intel, laser-precise strikes, and bots that don’t get tired, scared, or make dumb mistakes. Meanwhile, the regular humans are still out here dealing with fatigue, miscommunication, and slow decision-making. It’s basically Call of Duty on veteran mode, but the AI team has aimbot.
Sounds like you're conflating AI in army with a "robot army"
But tbf the gist of your comment is not wrong
The Taliban and Vietnamese would probably disagree.
Robots do make dumb and random decisions and movements..lol
Ever heard of bugs anyone?
Computers randomly glitch out you know
whether AI is present or not, to avoid from being targeted, is to avoid detection (visual, heat, movement, noise, etc.). AI speed up decision making and making recommendations from various sensors/data input.
12:06 you both fail to mention that it is a probability they are Hamas, a score based on connections this person has, they wait for them to go home then bomb the building, not the apartment. THE ENTIRE BUILDING. Best part, they called it “where’s daddy”.
The IDF has a much higher likelihood of killing civilians and labelling them H4mas, especially given their track record. So yes, it's definitely plausible they are testing their AI by killing innocent civilians. I mean, who other than the bloody untrustworthy Palestinians will verify if they were Hamas or not, or even who gave the IDF the right to kill ppl whose land they occupy and are now concentrated into an open air prison.
The IDF has a much higher likelihood of killing civilians and labelling them H4mas, especially given their track record. So yes, it's definitely plausible they are testing their AI by killing innocent civilians. I mean, who other than the bloody untrustworthy Palestinians will verify if they were Hamas or not, or even who gave the IDF the right to kill ppl whose land they occupy and are now concentrated into an open air prison.
We are very close to world leaders having gaming PCs in their offices attached to armies of robots.
Where routinely countries in respect to their capabilities are just gonna endlessly drone strike each other with smart phone apps
The easier war becomes the more often it will be used.
Power for thousands of years was limited by logistic resources and manpower.
Ai and drones replace both of those things.
Ai is getting scarier
this is the future
There's all of this talk about that final moment, the final lethal decision needing to be made by a human.
What about mines and other human/RF/heat activated IEDs etc? they're often set up weeks, months or even years+ in advance from when the enemy force/invaders etc are expected to make their way through that specific area.
That surely is even more separated from the conscious and thought out act of taking that executive decision to end that combatant's life? (Or civilian, car, dog, livestock, curious child in the case of mines)
If AI is programmed to limit casualties - if its goal is to keep humans alive at all cost - game changer - you have to change the GOAL of the game - as long as the GOAL is to win - AI will try to win at all costs including LYING to humans
if mines are fitted/connected to many kinds of sensors, that can potentially react upon sensing actual threat.
Yaaaaaaas love to see Economist ppl out there in the popular videod
Brose, who was featured here and works for Anduril, recently wrote a book titled 'The Kill Chain,' which I think is very relevant.
While I found this fascinating I could not help but be reminded of the Millennium Challenge. It was a war game in which Blue Team was given tons of informational and tactical advantages while Red Team was handicapped. The problem was Blue Team had so much information that they could not identify what was actually useful. While AI has an extreme capacity for processing information it is trained on previous examples meaning AI tends to inherit our biases and flaws. Most predictive models work on fewer bits of information than we think. In war too much information can be just as deadly as too little.
Autonomous Killer Drone is very scary!
Quickly integrating AI in military because of the fear of falling behind. Kinda reminds me of Dr Strangelove.
Scary situation
After complaining for years about the overly loud background music of Mr. Harriss' videos, I feel obliged now to say that the volume of the music has reached a level which makes listening to Mr. Harris much more pleasant. Thanks Mr. Harris.
An AGI signing a peace treaty, and corrupt politicians like dude what're you doing?
LOL
Exactly what is going to happen
AI maybe the way, An AI army versus a human army is a complex matchup with potential advantages for both sides. AI boasts tireless soldiers with lightning-fast reflexes and precision, potentially reducing human casualties and adapting quickly to changing battlefields. However, ethical concerns, vulnerability to hacking, and limitations in human-like judgment pose significant challenges. Ultimately, the outcome would depend on the AI's sophistication, the nature of the conflict, and strategic deployment, making it a multifaceted confrontation with no easy answers.
'At what point do advances in warfare guarantee our self destruction? Feels increasingly like we should be looking to use AI to prevent wars instead of fighting them....
AI will do alot of good for society but theirs many downsides to AI especially if it is weaponised. That's a whole different ballgame as they say
Liked it before even watching :)
DARPA Boston Dynamics with Google's Willow
Boston dynamic is not american comapny, own by Hyundai korean most of their chip is made by Samsung, Google willow is just a myth. So American empire is end
Johnny strikes again🎉
Wow, very well done! Great partnership and editing was great
AI can help us as a society advance much faster but at same time many people will lose jobs, it will lead to higher crime rates, more poverty etc. If they give AI a 'conscience' that's where this could go all 'Terminator Judgement Day mode'. Definitely needs to be restrictions in which AI is and isn't used
"if you recognize a cat you can recognize a tank" shashank joshi
"if you can dodge a wrench you can dodge a ball" Patches O'Houlihan
sorry it popped into my head and i had to post it lol
Thank you for making this video, been wanting you to make a video on this subject for some time! Very interesting and scary at the same time
Aggregated military data feels like Skynet
I know plenty of fiction likes to explore when these military robots go berserk and go against their masters. I’m not worried about that.
I’m worried that if military becomes mostly autonomous, a bad leader / dictator can easily become ruthless and indefinitely maintain absolute control. Before autonomous killer robots, dictators need to have some buy in from a number of people, be it the generals and soldiers.
I feel the second scenario is much more likely and possible in the near future.In an AI war, everything boils down to data.
* 2 years ago ,OpenAI has hired around 1,000 remote contractors in regions such as Eastern Europe and Latin America over the past 6 months. The company is building a dataset that includes not only lines of code, but also the human explanations behind them written in natural language. If you can replace a team of 10 high priced engineers with a team of 3 and AI that’s a massive cost savings.*
This video is the ultimate definition of "They had no idea what hit them!"
Cool vid Johhny, I would be intrested in seeing a whole video on palantir if you haven't done one already.
Looking a lot like a fern video today! Always got some fun visuals
Glad your back
I'm confused, how is it a partnership with the economist yet not sponsored?
Nonetheless, great outlet.
Kinda like my wife is my partner, we work together. As opposed to my boss is my sponsor, he pays me for a task.
The problem with AI is that it is based on algoritmic rules. If you know the rules you can influence it. For example, if you working on border control scanning on forbidden liquides. Someone put liquid in packages of flowers eveytime again and again. Then the algorithm gives a higher probability on flowers. Then when doing a bunch of liquid the smoggler puts it at a bunch of bananas, the algorithm will see the probability as low. As long you know algoritms, you can infleunce them. The art example where they put 1000 phones on a street in Paris so Google maps made alternative routes, so the street emptyied up, is the best example.
Hey! I’m excited that you show palantir on here. I’ve been an investor since they went public.
Fair question on if it’s safe or ethical.
Palantir has safeguards in place for just this reason.
Palantir realized years ago that the solution human and ai working together to come to a conclusion because there are something humans a better at and should have control over. And other the a computer/ai will be better at.
I enjoyed the video :)
Interesting... 🤔 What about deep learning vs human and AI?
Johnny took you this long to release a video
Been wanting for you 🤗
AI has not got there yet, i just asked Chat-GPT that my hob was not working, its answer was that the pan might not be the right pan to use with my hob :( I turned off the power to my hob and on again and it fixed the issue :) AI is good but until it has imagination its still just a tool
Bots fighting each other, sounds fun and harmless.
Así empezó Skynet en The Terminator. Da miedo, mucho miedo.
This is how Skynet started in The Terminator. It's scary, very scary.
"That's not a howitzer, it's just a very big banana, cancelling firing sequence."
- an AI, at some point in time
A little after someone walks into a bar and orders -7 lizards in beer glasses probably.
NVIDIA OMNIVERSE
4:53 Cameras _have_ electro-optical sensors. Those are not synonymous. It's like saying _"eyes_ is a fancy word for _humans"._
"You can see where this is going"
Long vacation dude
Good video again. I actually wish it were just a hair longer! I'd love to learn more about this.
Eagle Eye, I, Robot, Stealth etc. These movies have all told us this is not a good idea.
On an related topic, your hair looks great, Johnny.
But what if Ai detects a tank as a cat?
Tolkien would be sick at the use of his names on these weapons. It just shows the sorts of people who totally miss the point and continue to profit from destruction. The irony is staggering.
Came Too early to read the comments.
bit weird that a very much partisan publication is offering there particular brand for free to a very impressionable demographic its not sus at all
This is an intriguing business model. On one hand the empire has technological supremacy, AI, most advanced arms, on the other hand, it is funding needless wars, indiscriminate civilian killings, countless genocide, regime change, fuelling conflicts and at the same time not being accountable for anything!
I’m so eager to see how sustainable this business model is! And how long the empire remains on the driving seat!
Idk why they haven't just been putting bioweapons on those tiny drones yet. The drones can be small af and can get into anywhere as well as being neigh untraceable. Like what's stopping a drone or swarm of drones with no distinguishable markings from just buzzing into a town/village and dusting it with some nerve agent or bioweapon? It get's rid of all of the human targets in the town while leaving the buildings and utilities intact.
10:22 that right there Terminator is activated. You completely loose the human touch in war.
Always makes my day when I see one of your videos!
Nations should just try to deafest each other in video games?
we goes full cyberpunk with this one
Reality is getting crazier than fiction.
Comment section just proved how most of the people didn’t understand use of AI in battlefield. AI definitely gonna change war business in future
31 seconds is too early
Hi man, iam waiting for your video so eagerly
The Rus-Ukraine war has demonstrated how advantageous utilizing drones and smart technology can be on a modern battlefield, it's this weird hybrid war of trech/small strike teams and mass drone assaults.
30 million dollar tanks being disabled by a 2000 dollar drone or submarine drones destroying battleships.
War evolves
I love that you have Shasank Joshi on! Im a fan on the Economist and when he was the host of the Intelligence.
Great topic! ❤
Johnny Harris didn't have him on... He stole from someone elses interview with Shashank Joshi and tried to make it look like his own. Notice the censored titles throughout the video. He has done this before! When you learn how scummy Johnny Harris is, you will never believe another of his videos!!
Johnny Harris didn't have him on... He stole from someone elses interview with Shashank Joshi and tried to make it look like his own. Notice the censored titles throughout the video. He has done this before! When you learn how scummy Johnny Harris is, you will never believe another of his videos!!
I liked the graphics in this one, low poly with DoF, looks like my Blender sandbox
With launch of deepseek the video was uploaded at perfect time
It's never a war crime the first time
Ooooo catching a Harris vid 9mins after posting!
Whoever named their company "Palantir" knew what they were doing lol.
The topic is too familiar ! Thank you Johnny ❤ Love from NEPAL 🇳🇵🙏
wouldn't mind AI taking this job
The Terminator movie series is looking like an ominous sign everyday more and more!!
Love this guy's videos
I cant help but remember that video about AI-controlled slaughterbots 6 years ago: ua-cam.com/video/9fa9lVwHHqg/v-deo.html&ab_channel=ALTER.
I am not saying that AI is evil and dangerous, but rather with Johnny's video, AI assisted warfare is starting to become a reality, or at least the first stepping stone. It is now up to mankind to use this power for good and to control this power, before it goes out of control and unstoppable Slaughterbots that can decimate anyone they please become a true reality.
So we're setting up Skynet