11 Planes That "Don't Exist" - Darkstar, Aroura, TR-3b And More!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,6 тис.

  • @FoundAndExplained
    @FoundAndExplained  2 роки тому +93

    Install Raid for Free ☑️ Mobile and PC: clik.cc/kLa9s and get a special starter pack 💥 Available only for the next 30 days 💥

    • @HexaSquirrel
      @HexaSquirrel 2 роки тому +12

      Shameless

    • @Questionablethingy
      @Questionablethingy 2 роки тому +17

      @@HexaSquirrel i mean atleast he doesnt like mustard who post most of his vid on nebula and only post on his youtube once per a few month...

    • @IshijimaKairo
      @IshijimaKairo 2 роки тому +2

      No

    • @a3denclaggett254
      @a3denclaggett254 2 роки тому

      FUCK NO I FUCKING HATE SPONSORS ESPECIALLY RAID SHADOW LEGENDS. SUCH A WASTE OF TIME

    • @HexaSquirrel
      @HexaSquirrel 2 роки тому +8

      @@Questionablethingy I'd rather see him use Nebula than advertise shamelessly Raid.

  • @ItsJoKeZ
    @ItsJoKeZ 2 роки тому +1383

    i like how people get raid sponsors and we all acknowledge no one plays it & just want our creators to get paid

    • @blowinkk9396
      @blowinkk9396 2 роки тому +67

      Naw it shows all he cares about his the money. He will push crap stuff onto his fans if he can make a buck.

    • @Hell610
      @Hell610 2 роки тому +222

      @Blowin Kk If you dident notice this shit takes time to make and it doesent seem worth it if you make no money and he went faster during the add

    • @Ryio5
      @Ryio5 2 роки тому +167

      @@blowinkk9396 The average raid ad apparently costs about $4000-5000 per video, though, F&E might be making a bit less from them since he has a smaller viewer base. Regardless, that's a substantial sum that allows F&E to finance the channel and keep making the content we want to see.

    • @mioszradomski1825
      @mioszradomski1825 2 роки тому +89

      @@blowinkk9396 I’m sure he could pay for groceries with UA-cam subs instead of money.

    • @jtgd
      @jtgd 2 роки тому +97

      @@blowinkk9396 i dont blame him. He’s spending part of his life trying to make videos for others. If you don’t like the ads, skip it, or don’t buy the product.

  • @FiveTwoSevenTHR
    @FiveTwoSevenTHR 2 роки тому +98

    I don't know if the Aurora was a real aircraft but they made a 5 mile long runway at Area 51 for a reason. It's not used anymore but they had something that required a very high takeoff speed.

    • @stankygeorge
      @stankygeorge 2 роки тому +13

      Probably, they had high landing speeds!

    • @FiveTwoSevenTHR
      @FiveTwoSevenTHR 2 роки тому +3

      @@stankygeorge it would be both.

    • @PeteRose64
      @PeteRose64 2 роки тому +10

      the tr3b is a vtol type..no runway needed. the u2 & sr71 needed the long runways to land

    • @FiveTwoSevenTHR
      @FiveTwoSevenTHR 2 роки тому +9

      @@PeteRose64 the Aroura and the TR3B are different. The Aroura would need that long runway.
      The U2 and SR-71 can take off and land within a 2 mile long runway but something at Area 51 needed a 5 mile long runway which is really strange for near sea level.

    • @simondaly9960
      @simondaly9960 2 роки тому +6

      There's a small island off the west coast of Scotland, amongst the Hebrides, with a long and painted runway on it. Access only by UK MoD personnel, strong rumour Aurora also landed and took off from there

  • @fuqupal
    @fuqupal 2 роки тому +151

    The TR-3B Black manta was seen over Belgium in 1990.
    There are numerous pictures of it and it was sighted quite regularly.

    • @stefaneer9120
      @stefaneer9120 2 роки тому +8

      I live in Cologne and I never know, why this #TR3B didn't come to me. Because in Cologne there were many Belgian military sites and stations.

    • @bubhubb9714
      @bubhubb9714 2 роки тому +9

      I saw it right above the highway between Pineville and Middlesboro Ky. It was right before dark and you could see it really good.

    • @arinaZamorochka
      @arinaZamorochka 2 роки тому +3

      He flew there from the US Air Force base in Scotland.

    • @brianjob3018
      @brianjob3018 2 роки тому +3

      The rumored Black Manta is a subsonic stealth jet, popularly known as TR-3A.

    • @roadsidebong6333
      @roadsidebong6333 2 роки тому +4

      There are variants with electronic camo.

  • @Phil-RS
    @Phil-RS 2 роки тому +94

    The SR-91 Aurora has been spotted, it has been filmed and the donut contrails have been seen, we believe it has been landing at Machrihanish airbase which is situated in a remote part of Scotland. The thing is, Aurora is actually outdated and only manages around Mach 5.5 within the mesosphere. The TR-3Bs are based (we believe) at the Wasatch Range in Utah, there are other things you can look into, Project Silver Bug, Project Snowbird, Project Redlight. It is also believed that there is a spaceplane capable of reaching 38,000mph (25,000mph is needed to escape Earth gravity) almost instantly and be stopped to a stationary position in 2 miliseconds. This is the kind of technology often confused with UFOs, however, that is not to say that all UFOs are secret human technology. 'There are things out in the desert that would make George Lucas envious' - Ben Rich

    • @shawnhampshirehick101
      @shawnhampshirehick101 2 роки тому +3

      Yes it has. Aurora has the contrails you describe. Mostly flown night & will land early AM. Your comment is correct.🤔

    • @LetsTalkAboutIt24-7
      @LetsTalkAboutIt24-7 2 роки тому +19

      The only reason that keeps me from believing these crafts exist is that people supposedly know about them and are on UA-cam.

    • @phen1811
      @phen1811 2 роки тому +9

      If you stop from 35,000 kph to 0 in 2 milliseconds there would be way to many g forces for anything to survive

    • @LetsTalkAboutIt24-7
      @LetsTalkAboutIt24-7 2 роки тому +1

      @@phen1811 correct. Your body would turn into jello inside of your suit. Your bones would be pulverized into dust as all the rest of you liquifies

    • @harleyme3163
      @harleyme3163 Рік тому +1

      uh huh... mach 5... given its not a secret. it was noted in popular mechanics DECADES ago.. a test aicraft for hypersonic flight.. all it is LOL... people think its a mass secret? lookup the info on it LOL its right on the wikipedia ffs

  • @justme-ij2qy
    @justme-ij2qy 2 роки тому +174

    I am just another one of many who have seen a TR-3B. In November of 2017 I watched one fly from the northern horizon until it came directly over my head at an extremely low altitude.
    I was approximately 70 miles north of Malmstrom airforce base and it was headed in the direction of the base.
    There was no blue dome shaped thing underneath it but I could see into the 3 orange glowing ports.
    It's size is what struck me the most. I have never seen such a massive aircraft in my life.

    • @kiuk_kiks
      @kiuk_kiks 2 роки тому +57

      Thank you for contacting the FBI & CIA without using a phone.

    • @scullnbonesent
      @scullnbonesent 2 роки тому +3

      Same here

    • @neeneko
      @neeneko 2 роки тому +6

      well yeah, of course it was large. they were dirigibles.

    • @rythemzlatin
      @rythemzlatin 2 роки тому

      @@neeneko oh bollocks , you're just full of hot air

    • @Mike_Davidson
      @Mike_Davidson 2 роки тому +3

      There’s no such thing as a TR-3B. 😂😂😂

  • @TechX1320
    @TechX1320 2 роки тому +255

    My brother was in the Persian gulf. I got him talking about the SR-71 Blackbird, when they would come in for landing and when they would take off, how they would just constantly get swarmed with top secret personnel on the bases where it was landing, they would have snipers posted to make sure nobody was on the outskirts of the base trying to see in to see the planes. He said they were truly a sight and he wishes he could go back and see them fly again
    The subject came up because I have a piece of an SR-71 Blackbird from plane tags

    • @christopherneufelt8971
      @christopherneufelt8971 2 роки тому +13

      As far as I remember the Blackbird was removed from active service six months before the invasion of Iraq. Then and until 1998 was in the service of NASA. Sensor services were delegated to the U2 sensors and sats.

    • @TechX1320
      @TechX1320 2 роки тому +14

      @@christopherneufelt8971 he was in the air force before Persian gulf/desert storm started. Get him a few drinks, he goes all classified info lol
      Some of the stories are so damn sad

    • @hazchemel
      @hazchemel 2 роки тому +8

      Yeah. To me, the Blackbird is an archetype, and could be a prototype for a whole lineage.

    • @christopherneufelt8971
      @christopherneufelt8971 2 роки тому +6

      @@TechX1320 No, I served in the Army branch. The SR71 I studied it due to my qualification as engineer and there is much information about it open source. P.S. I hold a patent of a turbine in the Swiss Federal patent buro under this name. Take care yourself.

    • @lestergillis8171
      @lestergillis8171 2 роки тому +7

      The SR-71 and its predecessor the YF-12 were pure works of art.💙

  • @melissalydon3681
    @melissalydon3681 2 роки тому +29

    that tr-3b looks like the flying thing pilots have been seeing.

  • @tenshi66
    @tenshi66 2 роки тому +165

    The nighthawk was actually used intially in just cause, and is still in use today. They're ridiculously quiet. My dad was a eod commander and at an airshow one year, the mcas Beaufort commander reached out to the air force to arrange a surprise appearance of it. Dad brought me along the day and we sat in some recessed area near the approach path for aircraft and dad told me to look over and out crept the nighthawk. Quiet as hell. He often said one of his regrets was when he was a junior tech and tdy to Okinawa, when the blackbird was still operational, that he wasn't able to bring me, even though i was far too young to remember, solely based on my obsession with military avaition. Only reason he ever requested air stations, despite his hatred for the wing.

    • @F5Storm1
      @F5Storm1 2 роки тому +8

      They are being used as aggressor aircraft to train our pilots to fight stealth aircraft

    • @michaelwilliams9574
      @michaelwilliams9574 2 роки тому +3

      I don't know why he was unable to bring you. My grandfather was a chief on the Blackbird. My mom and her siblings along with grandpa, got moved with him while he was stationed there taking care of the Habu.

    • @tenshi66
      @tenshi66 2 роки тому +3

      @@michaelwilliams9574 I was super young, he was stationed at the lejune eod shop, but was tdy to okie. Meaning he wasn't on a pcs, so he couldn't bring Mom and I

    • @fromYAHUSHAreborn91
      @fromYAHUSHAreborn91 2 роки тому

      All stealth aircraft are unnaturally quiet.

    • @tenshi66
      @tenshi66 2 роки тому +2

      @@user-ql1us6ke8q it isn't a fighter, it's never been a fighter. It received the F designation so that the air force could use that as a way to assist in drawing the best pilots they had to the program. It doesn't even have radar. Let alone guns or the capability to carry any form of air to air weaponry. There's rumors that it's been used in active missions lately, specifically places like Syria

  • @jasonbrown3632
    @jasonbrown3632 2 роки тому +133

    I remember seeing some of those stealth drones in Germany back in 1992-93, during Central Fortrace, and Reforger exercises, they where only mock-ups at the time but still interesting how far our technology has come in 30 years...

    • @LetsTalkAboutIt24-7
      @LetsTalkAboutIt24-7 2 роки тому +4

      At Duke afb in 2008 and Eglin in 2010 we must have had the "out dated" Predators.......strange

  • @marcrutzou716
    @marcrutzou716 2 роки тому +21

    I think the stealth bomber looks scarier than the tr3b because of it's bizzare shape if they made a giant one of those I would shit myself if I saw it hovering above my house

  • @gabrielbennett5162
    @gabrielbennett5162 2 роки тому +47

    "We were doing stuff 10 years ago that makes that [the Blackbird] look like nothing!" - Clarence "Kelly" Johnson to my grandfather circa 1982.
    Grandpa (Vic Horton) was a NASA test pilot and engineer and flew the YF-12 and SR-71 Blackbirds out of Edwards.

    • @nicksober4763
      @nicksober4763 2 роки тому

      No way

    • @thewatcher5271
      @thewatcher5271 2 роки тому +4

      I Can Believe That, Man. It's Not What We Know Or Think We Know, It's What We Don't Know That Matters!

    • @Reach41
      @Reach41 2 роки тому +1

      @@thewatcher5271 I've worked on several programs that were unknown to the public at the time, and some still are. We'll never tell you anything just to satisfy your curiosity.

    • @kevineckelkampe2r
      @kevineckelkampe2r 2 роки тому

      @@Reach41 what's this we shit lol

    • @Reach41
      @Reach41 2 роки тому

      @@kevineckelkampe2r By we, I mean any of the hundreds of thousands of people with the security clearances and the need to know that are aware of the details of those programs. That said, nobody but a few aviation geeks, and the intelligence services of every anti-American nation, would find much of interest anyway.

  • @phoghat
    @phoghat 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks!

  • @tonk9385
    @tonk9385 2 роки тому +20

    "10/10 wouldn't recommend" -CIA

  • @Johnmk24
    @Johnmk24 2 роки тому +17

    People quickly forget, US military was flying F-117’s operationally since 1982. That’s 40 years ago. Look up X37B Space Jet. They are flying today in Low Earth Orbit. We can only imagine what we have no idea about.

    • @Hawken54
      @Hawken54 2 роки тому +5

      There have been whistleblowers claiming that we have the technology to take ET home.

    • @peterparker9286
      @peterparker9286 2 роки тому

      @@Hawken54 The main Man Ben Rich from skunk works said that.

    • @Hawken54
      @Hawken54 2 роки тому

      @@peterparker9286 - I remember watching a documentary where a guy said that. Couldn't remember his name though.

    • @jayscully9707
      @jayscully9707 5 місяців тому

      @@Hawken54definitely, I just think they release them publicly bit by bit to reduce the chances of causing a mass panic

    • @Hawken54
      @Hawken54 5 місяців тому

      @@jayscully9707 - People panicked over the virus. Imagine aliens.

  • @grandparedpill2695
    @grandparedpill2695 2 роки тому +11

    Myself and four friends saw the black manta. The lights are smaller and they're closer to the tips. We were at a home not too far from McGuire air Force Base. We are out back playing music and somebody pointed up into the sky and we all stopped what surprised us is one we couldn't tell how far away it was it was huge, I mean huge. It was silent, I mean oppressively so. It felt like as it flew over the home and where we were it felt like there was something pressing down on us, all five of us felt it. And then it turned north and slowly proceeded away. This thing we couldn't tell if it was conventionally powered or something new, but we were all impressed.

  • @wilhelmw3455
    @wilhelmw3455 2 роки тому +25

    If we get to know about them they are virtually obsolete.

  • @alastairward2774
    @alastairward2774 2 роки тому +27

    I've found differing opinions online as to why the SR71 wasn't ever shot down.
    One version says they just out accelerated any missiles, another says it was simply because it was never taken over Russia and in the end Russia had solutions as to how to do shoot it down anyway.

    • @hf117j
      @hf117j 2 роки тому +13

      It outran the missiles. It was fired on before and that's exactly what it did. Though that was when it was still being flown regularly. These days modern missile technology might be able to catch it. But the missiles need to have enough of a performance overmatch on speed or enough fuel to gradually catch up.
      The solution Russia tried to take it down was the Mig 25 foxbat. Top speed 2,171 mph. The sr 71 had a top speed of 2,200 mph. Problem is by the time they could get the mig 25 off the ground it was too late to catch it. These days it's probable that faster aircraft exist or are possible

    • @M167A1
      @M167A1 2 роки тому +7

      It's a problem of geometry.
      Think of a missile as being able to intercept any given point within a volume of space that looks like a dome over the launcher.
      There are of course a lot of variables from maneuverability to intervening terrain but we will keep it simple.
      To intercept you have to put the missile at the same place in space and time as the target. Even this assumes that that the target neither changes speed nor maneuvers.
      The Blackbird is going to enter and pass through this engagement volume very quickly. The missile is likely still rather faster but the blackboard is going to have a much greater chance of getting out of this engagement area before being intercepted then a conventional aircraft.
      Add ECM and evasive menu everything and it's a difficult target.

    • @68pishta68
      @68pishta68 2 роки тому +3

      @@hf117j It would not outrun a missile, one was actually hit by North Korea but it was only a piece of shrapnel and it did not compromise the mission. These older AA missiles would rocket up and past the target and then arc back down to detonate. The MiG25 could not catch it so they devised a plan to stage Foxbats ahead of the flight path and run racetrack patterns so one could drop in under it (letting the SR71 pass over it) close enough to let off a mach 4+ AA missile to chase it down.

    • @tylerclayton6081
      @tylerclayton6081 2 роки тому +7

      @@68pishta68 SR -71 outran SAM Missiles and could fly higher than SAMs could target. The Russians didn’t have the ability to shoot one down until the 1990s when SAM technology matured.
      The Mig 25 could not catch up because the Migs took too long to launch off the ground and the SR-71 could maintain its mach 3+ speed for much longer. The Soviets had no idea where exactly the SR-71 would come from and thus had no way to be waiting for it

    • @kendenning6517
      @kendenning6517 2 роки тому +2

      @@hf117jur kinda on target. The SR 71 was faster than a Mig 25, how much more, no body knows. It's top speed is still classified. Plus there was 4 types manufactured besides the drone. I know because my dad worked in Lockheed's management & when it's existence was public knowledge he told me. Also let's not 4get it was designed in the very early 60's, about 60 yrs ago. Think 4 a minute, in all those decades, why couldn't we design its successor? Or maybe 2? The X15 built at the same time & was even faster but limited by its rocket engines as 2 its range. This plane was simply a poof of concept plane. But the materials needed build theses aircraft 2 achieve hyper sonic speeds had been proven. So that leaves only engine technology 2 catch up. In 60 yrs they've had plenty of time 2. The space shuttle was big as a RR box car & traveled at speeds over 20Kplus mph & that was 70's tect. If truth B known we've probably had multiple prototypes or proof of concepts built already. But their cost out weighed practicality 2 put in2 production. We spent big $$ on the SR 71 program in 30 odd yrs & succeed in satisfying a need. Trick is 2 identify a need & develope practical designs that fulfills that need that's worth any cost. Our satellite tect in the 60's couldn't meet our needs but the aircraft aviation industry could. Birthing the SR 71. So put ur money on they have already. But not 4 surveillance but 4 1st strike capabilities. Satellite imagery can handle the 1st need, not the 2nd.

  • @michaelshortland8863
    @michaelshortland8863 2 роки тому +13

    I don't know about flying saucers, but i do know that the German's in WWII were working on a very radical propulsion technology called the bell, and that America got this tech after WWII. Imagine how much they could have developed it since.

  • @thestealthchannel
    @thestealthchannel 2 роки тому +35

    Back in the early 1990's I was visiting my local hobby shop and the guy I dealt with said he had a buddy in the USAF who was stationed in Saudi Arabia during Operation Desert Storm. His buddy claims to have seen an Aurora making an emergency landing at his airbase. I cannot verify the validity of this claim.

    • @stevebaconlettuceandtomato8353
      @stevebaconlettuceandtomato8353 2 роки тому

      Didn't one make an emergency pit stop near Salisbury Plain early 90s(aurora)

    • @kodakwhite4523
      @kodakwhite4523 2 роки тому +1

      SR-91

    • @RallyRacingVideo
      @RallyRacingVideo 2 роки тому +1

      How did he describe the aircraft? Design, appearance, dimensions etc?

    • @thestealthchannel
      @thestealthchannel 2 роки тому +1

      @@RallyRacingVideo He didn't provide a description. His friend was taking a big risk just telling him about it as he was still Active Duty in the USAF.

    • @RallyRacingVideo
      @RallyRacingVideo 2 роки тому

      @@thestealthchannel what air base he saw it at?

  • @HRHolm-bi6zu
    @HRHolm-bi6zu 2 роки тому +76

    I wouldn't at all doubt that a couple of these aircraft like the SR-72/Darkstar, Aurora, and TR-3B were at least experimental prototypes at some point. Seems though, that actually producing and deploying all three as active service aircraft would be quite redundant, as they all seem aimed at the same primary purpose---strategic recon. Unless any one or more of them was/were meant to also sport weapons capability in whatever manner. We may never know, or not know for several more years. The military establishment can actually be fairly good at keeping secrets *if* they *really* want to.

    • @Castan0157
      @Castan0157 2 роки тому +4

      I've seen a TR3B in person, it's real

    • @fredcarr3550
      @fredcarr3550 2 роки тому

      And they should keep their secrets. There are too many enemies of the US along with the help of traitors who are trawling for info and copies of plans.

    • @jaborl
      @jaborl 2 роки тому +1

      @@Castan0157 where?

    • @Ender275
      @Ender275 2 роки тому +11

      Growing up we had an active airbase near me and I would see your usual F-15s and all kinds of military craft. Hell I had seen a stealth on more than one occasion. I’m convinced at least one time I saw a TR-3B. It was much larger than any of the other air craft I had seen. I’d dare say it’s bigger than a Boeing 777x. It was an enormous black triangular craft with a globe shaped center similar to the one depicted in this video but the globe was a black color as well . The craft was completely silent and was moving slowly at first but started to randomly pick up speed . I remember riding the school bus and everyone was pointing at it in awe. We thought it could’ve been a drone at first but as it got closer and it passed over us we all quickly figured out that it couldn’t be a drone and it was enormous. It was moving super fast after it passed over us to the point where the whole craft began to blur and it began to move faster than any f15 I had ever seen. I still to this day have no idea what it could’ve been other than some kind of experimental aircraft. I’m convinced it has to be the TR-3B because of how silent it was and the globe like appearance in the center.

    • @fredcarr3550
      @fredcarr3550 2 роки тому

      I don't think we need to know as the enemies of the US will then know if they actually exist and blackmail/bribe their way to get hold of the plans.

  • @williamdrijver4141
    @williamdrijver4141 2 роки тому +14

    RQ-170 wasn't shot down by Iran, they took over the controls in 2011 and landed one in perfect functioning order.

    • @hf117j
      @hf117j 2 роки тому +5

      And people still argue that drones are the best option for the future of fighters

    • @tylerclayton6081
      @tylerclayton6081 2 роки тому +1

      @@hf117j They are. The technology just has to mature. The RQ-170 has already been replaced with the RQ-180, apparently it’s much better and has stealth technology.

    • @bobfenster3690
      @bobfenster3690 2 роки тому +4

      they didn't take over the controls or land it in perfect working order, they spoofed its gps signal making it think it was higher than it actually was causing it to crash land on its belly which is why when the iranians showed off their prize they had barriers covering everything but the undamaged top of the aircraft.

    • @ekscalybur
      @ekscalybur 2 роки тому +1

      @@tylerclayton6081 I shudder at the thought of politicians with the ability to wage war without risking the consequence of flag draped coffins. A world where the 'blowback' to a terrible decision is additional defense contracts that give them kickbacks, yikes.

    • @hf117j
      @hf117j 2 роки тому

      @@tylerclayton6081 Apparently you don't understand that unless one side has a level of encryption that will NEVER be broken, and the drones don't need signals. Then drones will ALWAYS be vulnerable to cyber warfare. Making them a poor choice for the future of warfare.

  • @rickh2572
    @rickh2572 2 роки тому +16

    Actually the F-12 came first as an escort fighter for the B-70. The USAF realized the didn't need the fighter and the airframe was modified to make a spy plane designated the RS-71. When it was publicly announced in the 60's that the plane exist, the letters got swapped. So everybody knew as the SR-71 from then on.

  • @russbear31
    @russbear31 2 роки тому +20

    I live near Whiteman Air Force Base in Knob Noster, Missouri. That's where the whole fleet of Stealth bombers are based (1:10). They are eerie. Through the years I've seen them whiz by as the pilots take them on a little training joy ride. 😊

  • @TJXD
    @TJXD Рік тому +1

    It's funny we say that the TR series Antigravity planes don't exist when there's one caught on video that the government released

  • @Armalite015
    @Armalite015 2 роки тому +13

    There’s actually a picture from a fishing vessel showing two jets along side the TR-3B overhead. Plus photos of its unique vapor trails in the sky, it appears this craft really exists.
    You can find evidence on Secureteam10 YT channel.

    • @davidshoyt1979
      @davidshoyt1979 2 роки тому

      that photo is a mockup of what a witness saw. the triangle is not real in the photo its superimposed over another f111. That said people would be surprised by what IS real out there.

  • @aurorajones8481
    @aurorajones8481 2 роки тому +13

    9:00 Its funny you would mock anti gravity given your love for aviation. Spinning liquid mercury has curious effects, and that's another reason why the substance has been vilified bordering being radioactive. They don't want the public diving into the substance knowing what it does.

    • @aurorajones8481
      @aurorajones8481 2 роки тому +3

      And the Nazi's did have guided missils...

    • @ThePowerLover
      @ThePowerLover 2 роки тому +2

      But it is toxic-

    • @blockstacker5614
      @blockstacker5614 2 роки тому

      Mercury is pretty easy to get tbh, just heat up some cinnabar.

    • @angrydragon4574
      @angrydragon4574 2 роки тому +1

      Do tell, what can it do? Can you provide any experiments for your claim?

  • @wolfenwingsable
    @wolfenwingsable 2 роки тому +20

    Love the idea of a fighter blackbird. Gotta one up the Russian foxhound and foxbat.

    • @M167A1
      @M167A1 2 роки тому +3

      Ah the YF-12.

  • @gunnar_langemark
    @gunnar_langemark 2 роки тому +19

    Isn't it like this?
    - If you've got the upper hand and are ahead of the game, you'll only unveil a new advanced weapons system, once you've got something even better up your sleeve.
    You don't need to scare even more - and you don't want the enemy to know exactly how far ahead you are. It will only motivate the enemy.
    If, however, you're behind in the game, you'll brag about new weapon systems that are still in development and not combat-ready to make the enemy less confident.
    I don't know. But I'd be surprised if the US does not have a number of secret technology systems - mature and ready - that we're not being shown.
    Even the Russians these days - hesitate to bring their newest technology to the front in Ukraine, in the hope that they can win without showing all their best cards.
    It would make sense, I think.
    Or am I wrong?

    • @manuelpalmeira7278
      @manuelpalmeira7278 2 роки тому

      The US has secret weapons that it will use on Iran.

    • @zeke2566
      @zeke2566 2 роки тому +1

      Russia always brags because they have junk,UNCLE SAM keeps secrets very well...

    • @kendenning6517
      @kendenning6517 2 роки тому

      Ur spot on. What we know 2day is old tec. What we'll know 2marrow is 2days tec. That's our pattern. What a foreign country has ??? The only info is what they promote or we somehow attain it. The only baseline is their past behavior... China's more than happy 2 revile what their working on. Its mentality is 2 have a hyper achievable 1st rate military yesterday. Will develop or steal what's needed in doing so. Whether they can actually build what they say is something different. Plus how good is it, is another question. The J20 is an example. Stealthy but not as stealthy or maneuverable as our 1980s tec resulting in the F22. The J20 not an efficient fighter. But Chinese tec is advancing quickly & they have our cash 2 develop it. (Thanks Wall St)... Russian tec is a real mystery plus they're broke$. They've developed some really good planes over the decades & some real stinkers. Russia's pattern is 2 show off. Think cold war. We reacted & the race was on. What better way 2 show off how good your equipment is than in a real war against a well equipped military? 2B a military Goliath they're failing badly against Ukraine's David. Should win but not because of it's high tec but by its larger resources. But easily could lose if NATO resupplies Ukraine losses. They're not holding back. Already used hyper sonic small missiles 2 no real advantage...... Hyper sonic means go real fast... That's it... Strategy is 2 move faster & quicker than the enemies can react. In either attack mode or surveillance... Trick is achieving range & maneuverability & better yet, stealth. Not so much faster speeds.... Ukraine has shown the world that large militaries with cold war type updated equipment & tactics isn't the future & not working out..... High tec platforms (big or small) is how the next war will B fought with.

    • @peterparker9286
      @peterparker9286 2 роки тому

      Your correct and Russia can wipe ukraine off the map if they want it is Mother Russia.

    • @kendenning6517
      @kendenning6517 2 роки тому +1

      Reading updated responses I fine it interesting that there seems 2B an aw of Russia. Russia isn't a nation that spawned an ethic people. It conquered their next door neighbors. Then substituted Russians in pockets of their regions. Never eliminating their populations. Using them 4 forced labor. Starting back in the latter midevil period up until Peter the Great & repeated afterwards after suffering defeats. Ukraine, Belarus, the Baltic nations, Crimea region & others. Putin trying 2 reconstitute the old Soviet Union is just another ambitious example of Russian expansion. No different than Hitler claiming Germany needed land 2 grow & set his eyes on Poland & Russia. He saw them as subhuman like Putin does people now. We all need 2 remember Russia was conquered also, giving this these nations back their independence. WW1 gave Ukraine its independence again until Stalin invaded B4 WW2, he tried in Finland but lost. Russia has been ruled by Sweden, the Mongols twice & even parts of it by Poland. Off & on amounting 2 about a 3rd of its existence. So there's not really a mother land, not like a colony would call its founding country. Example, Australia, Canada with referencing England. Russia's biggest threat 2 society 2day & it has been, is its nuclear weapons. Putin is very aware of the concept of MAD, so is the Kremlin & its General Staff. It's highly unlikely he'll use large nukes on anyone. If Putin does wipe Ukraine off the map he'll have 2 use small tactical battle field nukes. The Ukrainians have shown they won't give up & all he'll get is a radioactive waste dump. Along with being ostracized by the rest of the world, even China. Plus he knows this. A conventional war of attrition is all he has got. Wunder weapons won't do it. Plus some of his high tec gizmos aren't performing well. T90 tanks, barometric bombs aren't as invincible & deadly as promoted, Su57's haven't shown up yet (2 big a risk of falling into NATO hands), small hyper sonic missiles not having powerful booms. No air supremacy. Only thing working 4 them is long range artillery that the Ukrainians can't match, - yet. Plus there at max range now. Old fashion infantry & superior numbers in a protracted war is all Russia got 2 win with. That's depending on if Russia has the stamina 2 take casualties & equipment losses (which they will try). But remember, Russia left Afghanistan because of this during the USSR's last days. Similar 2 what North Vietnam did with us & our high tec gizmos & firepower. It's been proven a Goliath can B taken down by a David with a little help from friends.

  • @janeellis5136
    @janeellis5136 2 роки тому +5

    My family and I all saw the TR-3B way back in February 1977 hovering over Barksdale Airforce Base in Louisiana. We watched it for about 20 minutes. It slowly ascended up out of site. But it had a red light in the center back then. It didn't make any sound. It was big.

    • @radiofreealbemuth8540
      @radiofreealbemuth8540 2 роки тому

      How big?

    • @janeellis5136
      @janeellis5136 2 роки тому

      @@radiofreealbemuth8540 My parents had been watching it longer than I for a good while. I was inside. They yelled for me to bring the binoculars when I came outside to see where they were. It was pretty far up into the sky when I saw it. I could only see it with the binoculars. It looked pretty big to be so far up into the sky. It didn't make any noise. It was bigger that a large airplane.

    • @5655nasir
      @5655nasir 3 місяці тому

      im 2 years late. but for a aircraft to not make any noise at all, that is a indirect evidence of anti-gravity propulsion systems for me

  • @GreatSageSunWukong
    @GreatSageSunWukong 2 роки тому +30

    I've seen a black triangle over london twice both during thunderstorms, hovering thing that can take off fast and does a 360 spin to change direction, its probably an american drone

    • @btm_kiwigaming5449
      @btm_kiwigaming5449 2 роки тому +8

      They tend to like electrical storms a lot, probably energy harvesting.

    • @larryc1616
      @larryc1616 2 роки тому +4

      Was the black triangle🇺🇸 chasing a white tic tac? 👽

    • @billpugh58
      @billpugh58 2 роки тому +1

      Did you get a single pixel quality image of it on your phone? All UFOs and mysterious objects can only be filmed on pre 1960s era camera equipment

    • @oneilluminatus
      @oneilluminatus 2 роки тому +1

      If you make a 360 degree spin , you don t change direction, but are in the very same position as you where before. Lol.

  • @MartinKronstrom
    @MartinKronstrom 2 роки тому +7

    The Military will soon call you and try to convince you that the planes were in fact weather balloons.

  • @AXCV1995
    @AXCV1995 Рік тому +2

    It's not anti gravity magic, here's the patent US10144532B2, US10322827B2

  • @F5Storm1
    @F5Storm1 2 роки тому +11

    TR stands for tactical reconnaissance, most likely a drone or manned aircraft used for intelligence gathering for the FBI or CIA. They've been seen with spotlights shinning down at the ground, I personally witnessed it myself twice.

    • @fromYAHUSHAreborn91
      @fromYAHUSHAreborn91 2 роки тому

      The real spy satellites. Also, why would the FBI need these?

  • @josephmiller2620
    @josephmiller2620 Рік тому +4

    Thank you for the video! I saw and have pictures of the black manta hovering overhead while driving down the interstate. I was shocked at how silent it was and slow it was moving. The size was something I’d never seen along with the 3 lights on the outer wings which made it look like a large triangular flying object! Creeped me out!

  • @bruettingmarcus
    @bruettingmarcus 2 роки тому +10

    11:33 looks strangely familiar...
    Seen something like this like 10 years ago over a small village near Ansbach in germany.
    I was shocked and disturbed seeing three individual black triangular shaped objects flying and hovering in formation.
    And never I forget the orange glowing dots underneath it...
    Unreal silence and manouvers... they stopped mid air and hovered only to dissappear in the night.

  • @ilikeleek4087
    @ilikeleek4087 2 роки тому +10

    As an Ace Combat fan, I really get the chills after seeing these drones

    • @regularorcaabb9873
      @regularorcaabb9873 2 роки тому

      "BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP MISSILE MISSILE BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP MISSILE MISSILE"

  • @tdevosodense
    @tdevosodense 2 роки тому +6

    The TR3B have been many times in Denmark, and I have seen it over the city of Odense 👍🇩🇰

  • @DavidPlantz
    @DavidPlantz 2 роки тому +9

    I saw a TR-3B fly over my parents house in Connecticut in July of 1994 when I was 17 one early evening when I was in the pool with my friend Nate. It was silent and moving well over Mach 1. It had all the markings of the ones that a few years later showed up on the cover of popular mechanics magazine. It had to be nearly 300 feet across. It had the glowing yellow rings on the bottom and a glowing circle in the bottom middle.

    • @captmack007
      @captmack007 2 роки тому

      I'll bet that was a heck of a night!!!

    • @jamieharmer5654
      @jamieharmer5654 2 роки тому

      Glowing red circle?

    • @DavidPlantz
      @DavidPlantz 2 роки тому +3

      @@captmack007 It was one heck of a night. I remember like it was yesterday. It was 28 years ago.

    • @DavidPlantz
      @DavidPlantz 2 роки тому +4

      @@jamieharmer5654 There was a glowing reddish/orange circle in the middle of the huge triangular aircraft.

    • @derdude8201
      @derdude8201 2 роки тому

      @@DavidPlantz that’s exactly what I saw in the early to mids 2000s in southern Germany!

  • @seanobrien2183
    @seanobrien2183 2 роки тому +5

    Those TR3B's are something else. I badly want to see one up close

  • @PegasusTenma1
    @PegasusTenma1 2 роки тому +36

    I’ve seen the black triangle crafts at least a few times myself already, usually in the desert areas and at night, which makes sense.

  • @arinaZamorochka
    @arinaZamorochka 2 роки тому +18

    Angular devices are traction motors. They create vertical and horizontal movement for the ship. the engines do not drop the mass for movement. This is not a jet propulsion principle, like a rocket engine. The TR 3b Astra uses gravitational traction to move. The engines generate their own gravitational field, which pulls the ship like a leash.

    • @bluenightfury4365
      @bluenightfury4365 2 роки тому

      So it creates a gravity field that drags it along like a... Gravity sail?

    • @VoidSpace9
      @VoidSpace9 2 роки тому

      @@manuwilson4695 shut up

  • @jbryant6088
    @jbryant6088 2 роки тому +8

    Project Aurora was in full R&D on Area 51 in the 1980's according to Bob Lazar (1989). Interestingly enough, your scale depiction of the TR-3B seems accurate according to witnesses, who stated the US has 3 of them. Each at least twice the size of a football field.

    • @alwynwatson6119
      @alwynwatson6119 2 роки тому

      If that's true the US might put up a fight against the New world order.

    • @vintagespeed
      @vintagespeed 2 роки тому +1

      my uncle told me about it in mid 80s, yes. he didn't work on it but he did see it on the ground.

  • @GeneralKato
    @GeneralKato Рік тому +1

    The hühnebau isn’t fake. It’s just secret old proto tech. Two engines; one liquid metal centrifugal and several conventional thrust/anti thrust engines.

  • @MaxHohenstaufen
    @MaxHohenstaufen 2 роки тому +15

    RIP the uploader. Surely after this video the CIA will have him "suicided" or "mysteriously disappeared".

    • @RepJock88
      @RepJock88 2 роки тому

      Have him “Epsteined.”

  • @imaspacewoman
    @imaspacewoman Рік тому

    Don't tell me it doesn't exist. If is doesn't then I saw a UFO last summer at dusk in Southeastern North Carolina. There were 2 of them, identical triangles, one right behind the other only about 40 ft apart and very very low to the ground, maybe 40 ft above my tree tops, each about the lenght of 2-18 wheelers . They were traveling so slow that I actually ran inside to grab my phone to take a picture, but by the time I could run back out they were gone. There was at least 3 lights on the bottom of the craft, as orangey- red in color and I think one was green. I could not see the top of the craft only the triagle bottoms. There could have been a center light but I'm not for sure about that. What amazed me is the triangle shape and they were moving so slow a few feet apart and so low to the ground and they made no sound. I knew I had finally witnessed something spectacular and unusual. In doing an internet search the closest thing I can find to what I saw is a great similarity of the TR-3b.

  • @dasboot5903
    @dasboot5903 2 роки тому +6

    *Honestly, I was once watching the late night in Canada, Ontario with my good fellow friend, and both of us we saw two pieces of TR-3bis on the clear sky during the moonlight. They were standing still, but later on, one by one they moved with an incredible speed to the West of Canada, and disappeared quickly from our horizontal view down to horizon.*
    It happened before the year of 2019 !!!!

  • @Mr.redacted.
    @Mr.redacted. 2 роки тому +2

    FYI, that German "UFO" was a plastic modell kit sold in the '60s & '70s. I think it was sold by Aurora, the same company that sold Frankenstein and Wolfman kits.

  • @Michael_Michaels
    @Michael_Michaels 2 роки тому +25

    Dude, congrats for such effort! Excellent video!!! Top notch animations as ever!!! Thank you so much!
    PS: We should talk alot more about A12/SR-71 and Aurora! The Convair Kingfish reference (4:30) was very well sorted! To bad there isn't much about it. An animation of the mighty Kingfish cruising at Mach 4 would be amazing!... 😉

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  2 роки тому +1

      Ive actually got a full video on the kingfish on my channel. Here: ua-cam.com/video/0W3FsBTAqgc/v-deo.html

  • @Inaros404
    @Inaros404 Рік тому +1

    On the flying Saucer, look into: Av-22 I think it's called, or the Avrocar

  • @c.garison3770
    @c.garison3770 2 роки тому +20

    You really need to spend a week in the Antelope Valley in California talking to the retired engineers at the local attractions and learning everything there is to know about the CIA's A12 spyplane that is on display, the YF12 "trainer" a.k.a. the Titanium Goose (now located at the California Science Center in L.A.), the SR71 Blackbird and the D21 Drone (from my conversations, this was the craft that crashed in Keksburg PA in 1965). And for those that have been around the Chesapeake Bay have heard lots of stories of Aurora flying between the east coast of the U.S. and the United Kingdom for a number of years. I would swear that SR72 was brought out in the media to publicly acknowledge the concept that has been the subject of rumors for more than 30 years.

    • @MaddJakd
      @MaddJakd 2 роки тому +2

      The Chesapeak Bay area, hmmm?
      Time for some late nights. There have definitely been way more fighters heard flying over since the war started.
      I wouldn't be surprised if they try to fly something less typical form here in the near future.

    • @Spartanm333
      @Spartanm333 2 роки тому +2

      Yes on Aurora and the UK although that was likely the title of a series of test aircraft, not one as people suggest. Aurora was the dev project title.
      The base in Scotland utilised for cross Atlantic flights has been indicated to be Machrihanish which has an unusually long runway, extensive underground facilities including fuel tanks and is way up in the North of Scotland off the civilian air routes and commercial satellite patterns. Formerly a British RAF base it was thought to have been decommissioned in the 1970s although local sources have suggested significant ($millions) continued investment in the structures for a over decade after this. It was quite possibly the discrete European base of operation for space shuttle recovery in the event of an unplanned descent (hence the long runway) with it's own permanent Navy SEAL detachment.
      This has been discussed by science film maker Simon Holland: ua-cam.com/users/ProfessorSimonHolland

    • @breohtbrusmid489
      @breohtbrusmid489 2 роки тому

      @@Spartanm333 isn't that near where hikers snapped a diamond shaped black project plane in the early 90s? I'm surprised the US let us test any of their top secret test crafts after that, it was in the papers and everything!

  • @humanearthling240
    @humanearthling240 2 роки тому +16

    Saw the TR3B in flight over northern Md and south central Pa. I was driving on route 194 heading from Frederick md and the plane was flying west. Virtually it was hovering for 5 minutes. We pulled over and several others pulled over as well. Personally I wasnt very worried due to the fact that I already knew it existed. Long triangle with 3 lights underneath that looked like electrictro magnetic pulsers. After the 5 minutes it continued on and was out of sight in 30 seconds or so. Night flight.
    Second flight I saw it was being escorted with F 22 Raptors. Heading north over Hanover, Pa location

    • @kevineckelkampe2r
      @kevineckelkampe2r 2 роки тому

      I'm jealous

    • @lisakilgore577
      @lisakilgore577 2 роки тому +3

      Could you hear it? My Dad worked at Ft Leavenworth Kansas. This was a Saturday evening and I was in the 6th grade. He was driving me from our house to hers-about a 1/2 mile drive and we lived about 3 miles from the entrance to the fort. My Dad said Hey Lisa-look up. He pointed up and was smiling. I learned out the car window and there it was..about 20 feet above the car and a bit larger than a car. A beautiful plane and completely silent as it kept pace with us.. then suddenly it took off it was unbelievably silent and f a st. My friend, her brother and I watched it circle the city for about two hours before it went out of sight over Missouri. My Dad never talked about it and neither did I until recently.

    • @toddie4usa1
      @toddie4usa1 2 роки тому

      TR3B is a version of the U2 😄😄😄😄

  • @Patriot-290
    @Patriot-290 2 роки тому +6

    you forgot the F/A-XX the FXX PCA and the X-35

    • @davidshoyt1979
      @davidshoyt1979 2 роки тому

      and NGAD and PGS. Its interesting with many of these black aircraft. ever wonder if the loser in a contest didnt really lose at all but was shown to go beyond the scope of the contest and got shifted over to more clandestine missions or programs.

  • @garyprater8139
    @garyprater8139 2 роки тому +16

    I happened to see a new version diamond shaped TR-3B in 2017. It was very impressive. It was flying low late night and had no sound.

    • @Castan0157
      @Castan0157 2 роки тому +4

      I saw the boomerang shaped one almost crash in the early to mid 2000s. I was in the back seat going down the highway after dark.
      It was spinning out of control, and then just stopped and hovered, then left. Also had zero sound

    • @garyprater8139
      @garyprater8139 2 роки тому +3

      @@Castan0157 Wow! I bet whoever was in there had a heart rate off the charts. It sounds like the United States has quite a few different models. Thanks for sharing. How large did it look to you?

    • @professional.commentator
      @professional.commentator 2 роки тому +1

      @@Castan0157 Must've been some new guy operating it. 😂

    • @DD-sd4we
      @DD-sd4we Рік тому

      I don't normally follow this sort of science... It's the first time I've heard of the TR3B. Me and my uncle saw it... It exists. ... Mid Noughties A black triangle with 3 pink/purple lights in the underside corners, hovering stationary about a thousand feet up. I pulled over the car and we watched it for about 2/3 minutes in complete silence, before it seemed to move slowly east for about 3 seconds and then did a 180 to the west then disappeared out of sight up river in a split second. No noise whatsoever.

    • @bigfootdarrell13
      @bigfootdarrell13 9 місяців тому

      The one I saw was flying too slow to remain airborne, but it was flying. As it passed overhead it had a very faint whoosh whoosh sound...

  • @Spartanm333
    @Spartanm333 2 роки тому +36

    Thanks for this. Informative and presented in an accessible way.
    A nugget for you on the military 'flying saucer' theme. The British science fiction author John Wyndham is best known for two movies of his books, The Midwich Cuckoos and Day of the Triffids although he wrote extensively in his short stories of advanced technology, time travel, anti-gravity, pulse beam weapons and the real life work of Nicola Tesla. Wyndham was a bright man who worked for the British Government during WW2, including intelligence gathering. In 1945 and during Operation Paperclip, he was well aware of what the Germans had been doing with advanced technology.
    Many of Wydham's ideas were pre-emptive, based in reality including the threat of a global virus outbreak (the Puffball Menace, 1933). Post war, Wyndham went back to his novels and wrote an extraordinary (for the time) fiction story about a 4th Reich, pre-emptively hidden in Argentina as the war was being lost. The story included two advanced technologies that were largely unknown (publicly) at the time, one of which was the cloning of people and more specifically an advancement in capability through modification of DNA - human but better physically and mentally and with disease and illness cloned out. The super soldier. We now know this to be true, at least the potential to clone a mammal exists and to clone out deficiencies.
    Bearing in mind that Wyndham was at the height of his fame in early 1950, this book was never published, the circumstances of which are strange - it has been reported that every publisher rejected it. What is known is that Wyndham himself put it away and told friends that it wasn't up to scratch. It was never seen again in his lifetime.
    After his death, his estate eventually donated his works, diaries and memorabilia to Liverpool University in England, who rediscovered the novel and published it under the title Plan For Chaos. It's a very good novel with no good reason to have been rejected, except maybe that second technology...
    ...a German anti-gravity, saucer shaped, stealth aircraft. In 1945.

    • @gordonpkm7560
      @gordonpkm7560 2 роки тому

      Obviously he knew fall... otherwise he would have mentioned the 500foofighter craft built by the Allies in B.C. 1940/44 Roosevelts top secret Project Jefferson..

    • @tonyparamotor9487
      @tonyparamotor9487 Рік тому

      MY COMMENTS ARE BEING GHOSTED. SO IVE CHANGED AFEW THINGS. SEARCH MY INFO THE TR3-B IS MANMADE. REF EDGAR FOUCHE. THEY ARE SO FAR AHEAD WITH TECH THEY TRAVEL THROUGH SPACE .THE SECRET SPACE PROGRAM. TESLA MEDBEDS THAT CAN CURE.HEAL. YES JOHN LEAR KNEW THE TRUTH... RIP. DOES ANYONE REMEMBER THE PENTAGON TELLING THE PEOPLE THAT THEY LOST TRILLIONS OF TAX-PAYERS MONEY THEY SAY ... WENT MISSING!!!

  • @jimsvideos7201
    @jimsvideos7201 2 роки тому +2

    The hardest part to believe is the USAF actually buying 200 of their new bombers.

  • @thegamingidiots7012
    @thegamingidiots7012 2 роки тому +5

    bro ya gotta protect yourself from them dont die man

  • @Penetzi
    @Penetzi 2 роки тому +2

    Aurora I believe exists. I live in Western Montana, my girlfriend talked me into going outside at night and look at the sky on my trampoline. I saw this craft with it’s pulse thrust engine. That shit is real.

  • @williamdrijver4141
    @williamdrijver4141 2 роки тому +12

    Black Budget programs and UAPs are two different things. Also, certain programs are put in the black budget to avoid the usual bureaucracy if all American states want to benefit from a big contract. As happened with the F-35. And "black budget" comes in handy to conceal technical and financial problems.

  • @mk3vr611
    @mk3vr611 Рік тому +1

    The plane I saw was what is called the TR3B but it had no lights. It was silent following the freeway super low and I MEAN SILENT!! The cars were moving faster than the plane. It was all black and a triangle. It was going south bound following Interstate 15 just 2 miles from Hill AIR Force Base. It was wide covering from what I could see both sides of a freeway with 4 lanes on each side.

  • @The_3G_Eclipse_Guy
    @The_3G_Eclipse_Guy 2 роки тому +8

    I’ve seen two TR-3B’s between Chico and Bremerton WA in 2015. Shot was crazy, what’s even crazier is when I spotted it, it wasn’t completely night yet, but for some reason after passing under it, it was suddenly completely night time. I cannot account for the missing time.

    • @kevineckelkampe2r
      @kevineckelkampe2r 2 роки тому +3

      I was born in Bremerton and stationed at Bangor. Tr3b is real af.

    • @The_3G_Eclipse_Guy
      @The_3G_Eclipse_Guy 2 роки тому +1

      @@kevineckelkampe2r I always figured it had something to do with the existence of Bangor….

  • @duanejessup3708
    @duanejessup3708 2 роки тому +17

    I been studying the TR3B since 2016, it's a unbelievable magnificent flying craft, but back alien tech but made in USA . It's really untouchable

    • @theskyworrier
      @theskyworrier Рік тому

      And to think it was made awhile ago. Makes you wonder what they have now.

    • @chicharobenz1562
      @chicharobenz1562 Рік тому

      @@theskyworrier
      Tic tac ufo!

  • @zawnggempa
    @zawnggempa 2 роки тому +4

    TR-3B Black Manta the coolest air carft.

  • @Batlord_Carcas
    @Batlord_Carcas 2 роки тому +17

    I remember seeing a blue light in the sky one time flying fast across the night sky and it did a flash into a blue streak really fast. Definitely didn't look like any meteorite or comet, I suspected it to be a TR-3B

  • @ryanm.191
    @ryanm.191 2 роки тому +12

    dont use clickbait titles, youre above it, you dont want to become another one of those channels

    • @MaddJakd
      @MaddJakd 2 роки тому

      I mean, if the content's the same, who cares about a title and thumbnail?

    • @ryanm.191
      @ryanm.191 2 роки тому +2

      @@MaddJakd because it’s the start of a common downfall. First it’s clickbait, then shitty sponsors, then additional ads, then content stretching for the 10 min mark, then a drop in content quality

    • @MaddJakd
      @MaddJakd 2 роки тому

      @@ryanm.191 That's 100% hard assumptions and nothing else.

    • @ryanm.191
      @ryanm.191 2 роки тому

      @@MaddJakd its an estimation based on countless previous channels ive followed

    • @MaddJakd
      @MaddJakd 2 роки тому

      @@ryanm.191 Key word being "estimation."
      Stop being a pessimist pretending the worst is a guarantee

  • @richardoakley8800
    @richardoakley8800 2 роки тому +4

    I remember hill walking in Scotland in the early 90's and seeing triangular aircraft flying at altitude..

    • @RallyRacingVideo
      @RallyRacingVideo 2 роки тому

      What was your location?
      How would you describe dimensions?

    • @richardoakley8800
      @richardoakley8800 2 роки тому +1

      @@RallyRacingVideo Loch loyal , I first thought it was a vulcan bomber but but looking through my binoculars I couldn't see and tail plane and nose was pointed not rounded. We observed two tornados give chase but it just shot off

    • @RallyRacingVideo
      @RallyRacingVideo 2 роки тому

      @@richardoakley8800 do you remember exact year you saw it and do you remember dimensions of the aircraft? Vulcan sized plane or bigger?

    • @richardoakley8800
      @richardoakley8800 2 роки тому +1

      @@RallyRacingVideo allowing for cloud type i would say 30 thousand feet plus.. size wise it would be impossible to say. My partner used her spotter scope and said I looked like it had been designed by a child with a ruler with two white trailes with lumps

    • @richardoakley8800
      @richardoakley8800 2 роки тому

      @Jp733 I would say chasing it.

  • @RoleKeeper
    @RoleKeeper 2 роки тому +1

    The "Flying over football games" line made me LOL.

  • @MaudeHerringsdaughter
    @MaudeHerringsdaughter 2 роки тому +6

    One of my engineering school professors claimed to have helped build the Auroras. They were miserable failures. They cost almost a trillion dollars each to build, and for some reason the USAF insisted on using isoborane (zip) fuel, probably to use up stores of the crap leftover from the 60s. He claimed that the engines only lasted three or four flights because of insufficient materials and the isoborane soot deposited in the engine. The planes were actually too fast to be used for spying, and ionized gas (plasma) built up against the aircraft's skin. That distorted any camera picture and blocked radio transmissions from outside; so it couldn't see or hear the "enemy". He claimed the program was cancelled when the first of the two Auroras exploded right after takeoff with a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff watching from the tower at the Groom Lake base. The second Aurora was flown to Wright Patterson AFB in Ohio and left to rot in a hanger next to some other spectacular wastes of taxpayer money.

  • @AugmentedGravity
    @AugmentedGravity 2 роки тому +1

    Darkstar is just the coolest fucking name for a flying vehicle ever.

    • @davidshoyt1979
      @davidshoyt1979 2 роки тому

      theres also blackswift. thats pretty cool name to yeah

    • @AugmentedGravity
      @AugmentedGravity 2 роки тому

      @@davidshoyt1979 blackswifth sounds like the dark side of Taylor Swift

  • @68pishta68
    @68pishta68 2 роки тому +4

    @2:32, the YF12 "Oxcart" did not have a dual canopy, it was a single seater and was theoretically a bit faster than the heavier dual seat SR71, 2 man crew to operate the complex recon missions.

    • @thestealthchannel
      @thestealthchannel 2 роки тому +2

      The YF-12A's name was Rainbow. Oxcart was the original CIA A-12 variant.

  • @blueechodragon99
    @blueechodragon99 2 роки тому +1

    ah yes the classic antigrav that nobody can figure out how it works

  • @docsoulman9352
    @docsoulman9352 2 роки тому +10

    Saw what looked just like the TR-3b over Utah night sky in 2008…Absolutely silent…With a faint shimmering blue plasma around it….Went from a dead stop..hover to high speed in a flash and silently banked over the Wasatch front…

  • @cuteanimalshaha
    @cuteanimalshaha Рік тому +1

    On September 22, 2023, in South Korea, I actually witnessed a triangular UFO flying low at night. Strangely, there was no sound and the shadow moved smoothly as if sliding. And it was so dark that a black triangle was clearly visible in the night sky. Anyway, I remember being so scared that I got goosebumps.

  • @JoseSanchez-zk2zb
    @JoseSanchez-zk2zb 2 роки тому +9

    WOW You really included in this episode the whole kit and caboodle ! Excellent, excellent excellent !!!
    I especially liked the Kingfisher, Aurora, SR-72 and TR-3B Black Manta and German Habu saucer examples. Great stuff - congratulations ! 🌝👍

  • @tomjones-vy6ch
    @tomjones-vy6ch Рік тому

    anti-gravitational planes have been around for at least 50 years. In the early 60's they flew in our skies low altitude, I saw them as a kid so did others, but it wasn't talked about, people were like dogs, that never looked up much

  • @DEATH-THE-GOAT
    @DEATH-THE-GOAT 2 роки тому +3

    the SR-71 was target locked by Swedish fighter jets, the JA 37 Viggen.
    And at an other time a crippled SR was escorted over the Baltic Sea by Swedish JA 37 to Danish airspace chased by Soviet mig's. If the Swedish Air Force haden't escorted the SR-71 is surly hade been shot down.
    Later the Swedish pilots who rescued the wounded Blackbird was decorated. On Nov. 28, in Stockholm, the U.S. Air Force finally presented four Swedish pilots with *Air Medals* for their actions back in 1987, according to a video of the ceremony posted by the Pentagon.

  • @aviationgaming1564
    @aviationgaming1564 2 роки тому +1

    The F-117 is actually flying again as of 2021 for training purposes. I saw it flying around pooler Georgia a few weeks ago for Sentry Savannah

  • @dannypipewrench533
    @dannypipewrench533 2 роки тому +7

    On the SR-91 Aurora. I have seen three such crafts, but not the pulse detonation version. What I saw was best described as an ICBM with a man on board. It looked like a missile that decided it was an airplane. What I know about the project is that "Aurora" is an umbrella project, developing 15 or so aircraft. Some manned, some not. These things were a good 130-140 feet long (estimate, things were high up), and the first two I saw were acute isosceles triangles. But the third was a right isosceles triangle. It had a much greater wingspan. All of these planes seemed to be rocket propelled, and likely were space planes. While I cannot definitely say they were the SR-91, I am guessing they were definitely out of the Skunk Works.
    Side note: All of these were seen in Buckeye, Arizona, just several minutes out from Area 51 when flying at Mach 15.

    • @PtrkHrnk
      @PtrkHrnk 2 роки тому +3

      How do you know how fast they were flying?

    • @dannypipewrench533
      @dannypipewrench533 2 роки тому

      @@PtrkHrnk I do not know for sure. I did some estimations based on how fast they would have to go to get from Area 51 to my house in various amounts of time, I forget exactly everything I tried. But, assuming they were rocket propelled space planes, it is not unreasonable to look in the range of Mach 15, as ICBMs and space launchers typically go at that speed or faster. Whatever it was, it was definitely faster than anything I had ever seen.

  • @WildBillCox13
    @WildBillCox13 2 роки тому

    An anecdotal account:
    In the middle of 1966 I was part of a private middle school tour of the Lewis Research Center. We were shewn a 1st gen ion/plasma engine test, ogled at the Zero Gee catapult, and attended a presentation on . . . drum roll . . . the A12 "Nuclear Umbrella" project.
    Yep. Truth. There is nothing new under the sun. Not even "Star Wars" (SDI).
    These days I am a writer of speculative and fantasy fiction*. That tour in my halcyon days was a big part of the why of it.
    *Among other things

  • @cerebuscop6639
    @cerebuscop6639 2 роки тому +5

    In 1993, just above Homestead Airforce base, I saw a contrail at somewhere above 50 or 60 thousand feet. It was the "Popcorn on a String" typical of NO other airplane
    BUT the AURORA! As a Military Veteran and a student of Military tech, there is NO doubt in my mind THIS WAS THE AURORA! Also it transited my windshield (Big car, 1986 Chrysler LHS) west to east in approximately 10 to 15 seconds!

  • @istj66360
    @istj66360 4 місяці тому

    I've seen a TR-3B Black Manta back in I believe '95. It wasn't moving at hypersonic speeds; it just casually flew over the trailer park I was living in at the time and it was quiet. As close as it was to the ground, a conventional engine would've been loud enough to shake every trailer in the park. A helicopter did one time before that and it was no higher in the air than the Black Manta. If it aquires lift with anti-gravity generators instead of turbine thrust and aerodynamics, it makes sense why it was so quiet when any other aircraft would've shook all the trailers in the park.

  • @HOTSHTMAN53
    @HOTSHTMAN53 2 роки тому +9

    There’s actually a lot of videos, although the 100% validity of which can be difficult to understand, of the TR-3B, such as in Germany, England, USA, Israel, and other countries. In regards to Aurora, i actually heard it over my area around 7 years ago. It was December 28, and all of a sudden at around 9PM, we heard a big boom, as if ice fell from the roof. I wasnt the only one, the whole CITY i was in heard it. The local news started a cover up stating it was some sort of dry ice incident, but this is the only time in my life i heard such a thing (the boom). This was before i even knew about Auroras, then after watching a couple of videos on the potential sound it makes a couple years later, it almost exactly matched what i hard. Absolutely crazy. We can only assume….

    • @MaddJakd
      @MaddJakd 2 роки тому +1

      Booms you say?
      I'm just learning that apperantly the Aurora is sort of a "regular" over the years in my area.
      I distinctly remember one night, then the following day a few years back. I heard this very distinct boom that startled me that night. A strange one.
      Then later that day, I was a cart pusher at Walmart at the time. It was a little after 12 noon. Heard it again. All of us did. Stratled the crap out of us all. We looked at eachother. Crazy remarks. Part of me though "where there goes someone's insurance premiums" but it was wierd. Add to that, no sirens at all, so that wasn't it.
      Now I have to wonder....

  • @Tarasyoutube
    @Tarasyoutube 2 роки тому +1

    that yf 12 is gorgeous wow

  • @ChristianBurgess1010
    @ChristianBurgess1010 Рік тому +1

    I had the circular craft hover above me as a child in England. years later i learnt what I saw was ex Nazi tech. The guns were not visible/ attached, however it flew off in silence.

  • @snowdog03
    @snowdog03 2 роки тому +6

    I've heard of the Aurora in the '90s on such radio shows as Art Bell.

  • @jemonmoningka7316
    @jemonmoningka7316 2 роки тому +1

    Years ago (1996) i was with my dad in nevada at night i saw a triangle aicraft it look like the tr-3b or the aurora

  • @keeledover4218
    @keeledover4218 2 роки тому +8

    i’ve seen a tr3 b hovering and taking off
    and the contrail of an aurora at high altitude
    my dad was a programmer at lockheed
    b2s and other aircraft would fly over our house and land at some nearby undisclosed airport
    he also worked at nasa
    my grandfather also worked on some secret stuff
    i love aerospace and considered it as a career to keep the family legacy going
    they are both gone and were some of the best engineers in the country

    • @1Gadspeed876
      @1Gadspeed876 2 роки тому +2

      Ive seen one in 2016 cant forget my neighborhood went craznuts i was under my plum tree when a weird heavy humming sound started to rumble the house then a shadow came over me when i looked up it was a black triangular object just slowly hovering over the house then it dissappeared light lighting just vanished instantly it was unreal like an UFO THEN FEW MINUTES LATRR US CHINOOK HELICOPTER FLEW TO WHERE IT WAS HOVERING FROM WANTED TO SEE IT ON NEWS BUT NOTHING NOW I KNOW WHAT IT JS AND THAT ITS TOP SECRET

  • @raddpeanutt
    @raddpeanutt 2 роки тому +1

    I’ve seen the tic tac ufos!

  • @repapeti98
    @repapeti98 2 роки тому +10

    How to make the perfect clickbait video:
    -Top secret
    -UFO
    -The government doesn't want you to know
    -Little information is known
    -Someone said they know someone who said he saw it (viable source)
    -Nazi German scientists
    -It flies faster than anything before it
    -Antigravity technology
    -Extraterrestrials (Aliends? We are not alone in the universe? Omg food for thought)
    -Can go anywhere in under X amount of time

    • @datathunderstorm
      @datathunderstorm 2 роки тому +4

      Hahaha 🤣 technically you’re absolutely right.
      However……”Shirley” I’m fairly certain you do realise most of us were NOT suckered into clicking on this video because of the points listed above, but because the author of these videos is so good at his productions, most of us who have already subscribed would click on anything he produces.
      Perhaps it’s the brilliantly created animations, perhaps it’s that relentless uplifting sense of humour he has - or maybe it’s his soothing pleasant voice narratives.
      All I know is, this is top notch entertainment that some TV studios would pay top dollar for - and we’re lucky to get it for free on UA-cam.
      One more thing; you just know any subject he selects and produces IS going to be an audio visual delectable treat, from which you will come away with a big grin on your face and correspondingly raised spirits (no, not a flight of B2 Spirits) 😜.
      The well developed humour level gets me every time.
      If UA-cam did Oscars - this channel would definitely win!
      Oh, just one more thing; visiting the comments section is like free access to a treasure trove of semi-classified information in itself - you literally learn more than you bargained for.

    • @MaddJakd
      @MaddJakd 2 роки тому

      And yet of you bother to embark on proper digging into the topic brought up, you'll learn a crapton

  • @vintagespeed
    @vintagespeed 2 роки тому

    my uncle worked on radar systems at George and Edwards and first told me about the aurora in the mid-80s. it's been around a long time.

  • @stevenbass732
    @stevenbass732 2 роки тому +12

    In point of fact, the SR71 was originally designed as the YF12. As a kid in the late 50s and early 60s, I had a model of the YF12. The reason why is simple, there wasn't funding for spy aircraft, but there was for advanced fighters. After the U2 was intentionally shot down the YF12 quietly disappeared and the SR71 came to the fore.

  • @terrymichael5821
    @terrymichael5821 2 роки тому +2

    The Aurora has been videoed flying over north Texas, with Donut Contrails, the aircraft does exist.

  • @ultralaggerREV1
    @ultralaggerREV1 2 роки тому +3

    My question is: what is it that Americans already had stealth tech for decades while the Russians just commissioned their FIRST stealth jet like 2 years ago?

    • @jul1anuhd
      @jul1anuhd 2 роки тому

      An authoritarian political system which doesn't support free thinking (out of the box) isn't very good for creative minds and innovations. If you get indoctrinated to don't think freely and just believe in what the government tells you, you most likely won't be as creative as your counterparts in other democratic nations.

    • @JTimberB.45
      @JTimberB.45 2 роки тому +1

      Russia is not very wealthy. They will focus on conventional warfare advancements and doctrines they have proved effective, they don’t have the budget for advanced and experimental projects like the US does

  • @stonedgaming7900
    @stonedgaming7900 Рік тому

    For the last one, I might be able to explain. It's redirecting plasma and manipulating magnetism.
    You start with a vacuum chamber and some murcury. When you ionize murcury(electrify it), it creates a plasma that gets cycled and redirected in a dyson sphere to several exhaust ports. The question is, how is it powered.

  • @aardque
    @aardque 2 роки тому +8

    So in the mid '80's or so, I had a friend that lived in a pickup camper near Marysville, just off the Yuba River and they had this immense gold dredge that would just go back and forth across that river, sucking up all it could. Beale Air Force Base in California is very close to Marysville and from my friends camp site, we could watch the SR-71's and U-2's takeoff and land. The U-2's could do these amazing wingovers, absolutely vertical, without falling from the sky.
    One day I noticed, in the opposite direction from the air base, a low and sleek teardrop shape, silent, that looked like it was trying to follow the terrain, from east to west, over the low Sierra Nevada foothills. I didn't think much of it at the time, it looked similar to the F-117 that was just becoming public, but it was not at all "angular" in profile. Years later, while browsing aircraft to add to my flight simulator, I came across something called the "Aurora TR-3b Black Manta" and when I flew it in my sim, it was EXACTLY the same shape.
    I am convinced, what I saw that day, was the "baby B-2" and there were no gravity motors, no pulse detonations, it was sleek and silent and beautiful and I know this plane exists. Or did, it's been several decades since.

    • @captmack007
      @captmack007 2 роки тому

      Thats phenomenal what a sighting!

    • @kayhansen9229
      @kayhansen9229 2 роки тому

      In 1969 my family moved to Roseville but I started seeing in the night sky between 12:30 and 3:30 in the morning over Roseville was like everything you've heard never saw one close up but I'm sure it was not human flown although I thought they were in cahoots with us because if I could see them with my naked eye so good all the Air Force bases the hours they kept were very human-like they had Sundays off and another day off during the week these had to be anti-gravity. Are you remember very vividly watching them before we went to the Moon and with my neighbors too we kept thinking that they tell us after the moonshot what it was they never did I watched them for many years because I had a peptic ulcer that kept me up late at night I knew then that I was seeing history being made and that someday when I was very old maybe they talk about it here I am 65 and still the only people who have talked about it are the ones you guys laugh at but I know the truth. It is much more along the lines of Charles Hall in the tall whites and Bob Lazar. I used to stand at the window and watch and wonder whose dad was in church Sunday morning and or mowing the lawn and then up with aliens at night. I kid you not.

    • @thierryguitare3035
      @thierryguitare3035 2 роки тому

      @@kayhansen9229 Yeah Kay Surfing with the Aliens !and keep the secret, probably difficult for pilots and those who have worked on those secret projects 🖖

  • @scullnbonesent
    @scullnbonesent 2 роки тому +2

    I’ve seen the tr3b or something like it…whenever I went to take a picture or video , my cameras coincidentally stopped working

  • @MustangsCanTurnToo
    @MustangsCanTurnToo Рік тому +6

    Dark star was the call sign for the 965 AACS, an E-3 Sentry (AWACS) squadron. Letters would be used to designate different flights happening on the same day.

  • @AugmentedGravity
    @AugmentedGravity 2 роки тому +1

    “Supersonic fighter jets”
    Shows SR-71

  • @michaelirvine1878
    @michaelirvine1878 2 роки тому +6

    I have seen this TR 3 B myself twice. So it’s real but who does it belong to?

  • @clarencehopkins7832
    @clarencehopkins7832 2 роки тому

    Excellent stuff bro