The Y Chromosome Supports Human Evolution
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 чер 2024
- I'm sick of THIS argument as well.
Sources:
Makova 2024: www.nature.com/articles/s4158...
Zahn et al., 2023: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...
Cechova et al., 2020: www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073...
Oetgens ert al 2016: academic.oup.com/gbe/article/...
Hughes et al., 2013: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
The Mind Electric, ミラクルミュージカル
Point Pleasant, Brock Berrigan
Intro: The Mind Electric by Miracle Musical
www.hawaiipartii.com/
Outro: Point Pleasant by Brock Berrigan
www.brockberrigan.com/
open.spotify.com/artist/39sPW...
Socials:
gutsickgibbon@gmail.com
@Gutsick_Gibbon
Support the channel!
/ gutsickgibbon
www.redbubble.com/shop/gutsic... - Розваги
I had a creationist roommate when i was taking anthropology classes none of his arguments made sense and he got angry when I tried to explain how science actually worked. Thanks for debunking these ideas its ruining education and religion for people.
Is that right? So when has observational science ever witnessed information coming into existence without a mind. A.I. for example can generate new information from existing data sets, what is the original source of the A.I.? You see a street sign, what is the source of the information? Easy right? A mind. Now look at DNA, the most complex sequence of purposefully arranged information ever discovered, its so complex it took over 2,500 scientists 13 years to map a human genome and here's the part that makes so much sense to every evolutionist who claim creationists make no sense, 'it required no mind and came into existence for no reason or purpose and enabled matter that cannot 'think' design a brain that can comprehend abstract thoughts that the matter building the brain is completely unaware of', yeah you guys make so much sense.
My parents and older brother are all young earth creationists and they get angry when anyone disagrees with them. I gave up trying to explain why they are wrong long ago.
I grew up in Mississippi. There's two types of people. Severe Bible thumpers (would burn someone as a witch to save their soul) and people with an IQ that supports the ability to wonder & ask questions.
My Catholic husband and all the Catholics he knows think evolution is truth.... they say the bible should not be taken literally. So, there's Catholics with an IQ and others that think Adam's and Eve's children created the human race with incest. They also think that Noah's family repopulated the Earth with incest. How stupid can a group of people get... answer Super Scary Stupid. Those people are allowed to Vote! 😮😢
According to creationists my balls make me not an ape, that is the silliest thing I have ever heard
Right! 😂😂 they’re getting desperate now. First it was apes don’t have white sclera…until they realized ‘oops, white sclera does in fact occur in every living species of great ape’, so now it’s their…giant balls?! 😂 it’s seriously getting embarrassing at this point
Hanging ball are a trait of the magnorder Boreoeutheria, which has 2 superorders, Euarchotaglires and Laurasiatheria, coincidentally Order Primata are in Superorder Euarchotaglire.
Hanging ball are a trait of the magnorder Boreoeutheria, which has 2 superorders, Euarchotaglires and Laurasiatheria, coincidentally Order Primata are in Superorder Euarchotaglire
That’s what she said
This would be especially silly, because even if a y chromosome did make someone not an ape, humans who lack a y-chromosome (roughly half the population) would still be apes.
i like how the creationists completely ignore that most women, half the human population, don't have this chromosome. though they're usually the kind of people who don't think of us as human lol
It was not contained in the rib that was taken from Adam ;)
The only arguable women with a Y chromosome would be males with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome and they're a tiny tiny amount of the population. The exception that proves the rule.
In the Bible, the antichrist (the ENEMY) is depicted as hating/"having no regard" for women.
Some women do have a Y chromosome but usually they're Intersex, like what the previous comment said. But yeah, not every human has a Y chromosome. It's just easier to go by the X chromosome since everyone has at least one!
@gypsylee333 they are females. They have female sex, chromosomes are irrelevant to their sex. Calling them male in this context is just strange as they have female physical biology.
11:17 This is how YEC operates:
YEC uses an argument,
scientists smack it around,
YEC abandons argument for a while
YEC tries other arguments
After enough time passes that the argument's refutation falls out of the social short term memeory, YEC uses the old argument again.
It's just a game of whack-a-mole.
"It's just a game of whack-a-mole." - Yep, no wonder it's Kent's favourite! 🤣
It's a game of bullshitting their own congregations.
It's bizarre how the primary aim of the fundamentalists and far right is to mislead their own base, it's very cult like, there are not that many groups in the world who's PRIMARY goal is to fool their own side.
It's a game of bullshitting their own congregations.
It's bizarre how the primary aim of the fundamentalists and far right is to mislead their own base, it's very cult like, there are not that many groups in the world who's PRIMARY goal is to fool their own side.
Reminds me of the Flat Earth scene.
Its the Donny Deals fallacy.
I started to watch this yesterday, and 5 minutes in I got a "this video is not available" error message.
Glad to see it reposted.
I saw it yesterday, but happy to see it again.😊
They were busy fact checking her work but couldn’t find anything wrong so they just went ahead and let it go
This comment is not available.
@jamesduncan3673 - Ms Gibbon explains what happened in the comments somewhere along the line. It's too bad that thread didn't get pinned.
9:57 Special Creation is stored in the balls.
Special Creation is very ballsy!
I cackled 😂
An oldy but a goody😅
There's a vas difference, between human and chimp testes😉
There's a vas difference, between human and chimp testes😉
Thank you for this video. I support you from Kenya.
I know this Kenyin- they only partially support you.
@@LandonAshworthDirectswhat the fuck are you on about?
Hope things are going well for you ☺️
Kenya: the birthplace of humanity
Hi Kenya from The Pacific Northwest 🖖
I'm 100% ok with watching a reupload...y'know...for engagement. I. Am. Engaged.
I still say that it is so cool that we are related to other animals and a part of nature, rather than "special" and apart from nature.
I felt the same even when I was a believer in a god, and think fundies be weird.
It's just so weird, as an atheist I just can't understand. If you believe in God, the creator of the universe, no one and nothing can ever take that away from you. "God did that", is always your answer for everything. Why waste so much time developing competing theories that are garbage in the face of them. God did evolution, boom easy.
@@Broken_robot1986
Exactly. The problem is with those who insist in biblical inerrancy. The bible is the word of god so must be literally true.
That means they have to work arse about face starting with the conclusion then play "squaring the circle" to make the "evidence" fit.
As you say, WTF is the point of the mental gymnastics required to be wrong? lol
@@pencilpauli9442 it's honestly more about control than anything. If they keep people dumb, it's easier to fleece them for money and get them to hate you hate than if they're educated and think for themselves. I don't think it's a coincidence that the most bigoted people end up being fundy preachers. Thy want everyone to conform to what makes them comfortable, and dumb and gullible people make that easier for them. If they make some profit along the way, even better.
@@pencilpauli9442 - Not even the _Bible_ itself claims to be inerrant.
some inability to let go the idea of being the center of the universe I guess.
In a grouping of species that's as varied in mating strategies as the apes, or primates in general, it's not so much _unexpected_ as _we should have expected something like this._
Yesterday i was working and saw this video on yt, but by the time i got off work and could watch it, it was gone.
Glad to see it's back
29:55 THIS! This is why GG rocks and YECs struggle. I love to see that dichotomy, where skeptics and scientists recognize the complexity of matters, while "believers" will just parrot talking points without being able to explain and make sense of everything. Thanks Erika 💙
Thank you for clarifying gene content vs gene sequence identity at @24:17. I was confused.
10:45 I see Donny is still using "preclusionary" without understanding it.
Is there anything he understand?
@@valivali8104Selling used cars?
@@JD-wu5pf 🤷🏼♀️ why did he leave?
@@valivali8104 I mean, probably because it's so much easier to peddle religion than cars lol
@@JD-wu5pf and religious people wonder why non-religious (and religious people of every other religion) don’t take their religion seriously...
I'm going by the view that the plethora of skulls behind her are those Creationists who refused to listen to Erica's reasonable arguments, and on their death turned out to have the tiny braincases they swore humans couldn't have.
I fully support your hypothesis. Unfortunately Kentles had no ossified neurological remains.
Ironic, considering divine consciousness (or belief in God) is our greatest separation from all other animals.
@@Curtis-pj1wq what data do you have to support a lack of belief/ conscious awareness in all other existing mammals?
@@erinmorash9334
Sorry, I would love to have this conversation, but I'm being censored. Very closed-minded channel.
@@Curtis-pj1wqlmao
Imagine a world where creationists were _doing_ _science_ and actually discovered this result for themselves, rather than, as always, mooching off real work
Imagine a world where you actually exposed yourself to Creationist research and discovered that they'd disproved human and chimp common descent with bioinformatics
@@cosmictreason2242someone who *actually* robustly disproved common descent would instantly be the most important biologist - and I would argue the most important scientist - of, at the very least, the 21st century. Instant Nobel prize, for a start. Tell me, do you think that the entirety of modern science and the collective countless hours of research we have done is mistaken, or lying?
@@cosmictreason2242 so there's a conspiracy keeping this hard evidence away from the general public but you've luckily found it.
@@cosmictreason2242 Do you mean that one guy who said their genomes are only 80% similar because he made a trivial high school math error? Or do you mean the people who say "mutations can't increase information" without ever defining information? Or maybe this really is research I've never seen
@@cosmictreason2242 Citation needed.
It's kind of fun to have a chromosome that supports human evolution.
You've got 46 of those, we all do ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I like how chromosomes are wound up all tight. It's like they're scared.
@@Broken_robot1986 - Au contraire! Our chromosomes have been working night and day over vast stretches of time to get us here today. They are robust!
This argument is wild to me, because humans without the y exist? What separates them then?
Don’t even give them the idea to start claiming women are apes and men are specially created godly beings 😂
Wait until you find out about humans that have _two_ Y chromosomes (and _three_ X chromosomes as well)!
those are called "women" and according to a plain reading of the Bible, those don't really count as human. Yeah, turns out people 4000 years ago were kiiiiiinda misogynistic. Good thing nobody today relies on what they thought to inform their own morals OH WAIT
You know creationists. Women don't count to them and transgender people don't exist. They don't want the truth. They only want confirmation.
"Any variation from these typical numbers is referred to scientifically as an “aneuploidy.” If there is one additional X or Y, it is known as a “trisomy” (“tri” denoting the number 3). Genetic conditions that reflect a trisomy include:
47,XXY (Klinefelter syndrome)
47,XXX (Trisomy X)
47,XYY
Trisomies are the most common X and Y aneuploid conditions. Less common are “tetrasomies,” which denote the presence of four sex chromosomes:
48,XXYY
48,XXXY
48,XXXX
Still rarer are the “pentasomies,” indicating five sex chromosomes:
49,XXXXY
49,XXXXX
...
About 20 percent of persons with sex chromosome aneuploidies exhibit “mosaicism,” meaning they have two or more cell lines with different genetic signatures. Examples include 46,XY/47,XXY, and 45,X/47,XXX."
It is my understanding that sex related genes evolve faster than other genes because they are directly involved with the act of spreading genes. It is why duck genitalia are so odd. This isn’t such a groundbreaking revelation as creationists are trying to suggest.
I have never looked at duck genitalia. Please expand on your post!
New Gutsick Gibbon video, lets goooooo
Let me see if I have this straight. Promiscuous mating in Pan leads to males who generate more sperm being successful in producing offspring, but generation of greater quantities of sperm leads to increasing mutation of the Y chromosome due to the testes going through more cycles of sperm production, thus the greater variance of the Y chromosome which is seen in the resulting genotype (hope that is the right word) compared to that seen in the X chromosome or the other 23 pairs because the females produce all their gametes while they are in utero and thus have lesser mutation rates. Thus the female contribution of their half of the twenty-three non-sex chromosomes buffers the changes we would see from the male contribution, and male mutated non-sex chromosomes are easier to select against while the Y chromosome has to get through?
Great video by the way, as always.
This little brush with creationists is quite astounding to me, as someone living outside the USA. Are they all insane?
As an American, it certainly seems that way sometimes.
yes.
Some are; many are just tragically ill-informed or even lied to, and isolated from proper science education.
That's why what Erika does is so important. There are people out here who see these kinds of videos and change their mind when presented with accurate information.
@michelleharnett1351 - Ms Gibbon went to a young-Earth-creationist-education middle school herself. She has bounced back with a vengeance and will soon have her PhD in reality!
"not the size of the sequence" ... I nearly spewed my drink.
So what you're saying is, if we actually dive into the primary data and apply the basics of genetics and primatology, then Y-chromosome sequencing ends up confirmed the evolutionary relationships and timelines postulated from dozens of other lines of evidences?
No wonder creationists love this argument. It requires their audience not to think critically!
It don't tho
Creationists _always_ require their audience not to think critically.
That and not to pay much attention to what the creationists are actually doing with all those babies.
@@Sableagle well, they're not twerking on them or pumping them full of drugs used to chemically castrate sx offenders 🤷♂️
Whenever I'm feeling down about being indoctrinated as a child in YEC Christian Schools, I come to listen to you and Aron Ra. So many missed opportunities because my younger self didn't understand evolution and was taught to reject any teaching of it. There's nothing wrong with learning a big part of science, but my teachers and pastors made it sound like demon possession and a future in an eternal lake of fire.
Even if going back to college right now seems impossible, maybe the possibilities of going back will open up in the future.
Thank you so much for posting. I enjoy your educational videos so much.
@annasalmans5523 - The past is gone. You are here now, so welcome! .^_^.
Honestly, I was not indoctrinated in YEC, but still half the stuff Erica read from those papers flew over my head. Genetics reaserch papers is a hard read... Can you imagine doing so without an experienced guide?
I'm a little puzzled by this. Does this mean that YECs believe that cats have a common ancestor, dogs have a common ancestor, etc., but the idea of all of them sharing a common ancestor is out of the question?
Sadly yes
Correct. When you understand biology, it makes perfect sense.
You're also puzzled because up to this point you have deliberately remained ignorant of what YECs believe
@@cosmictreason2242 The real problem is that I tend to give their claims the attention they deserve.
@@cosmictreason2242It’s really hard to determine what YEK believes as they’re constantly changing their narrative.
This is my favorite journal club outside my own field (bacterial genomics)!
I think it's really incredible that evolutionary biology and genetics have advanced so far; twenty years ago they'd just completed the human genome project after three billion dollars, thousands of scientists, and a decade of work, and now we're able to sequence and characterise chromosomes in far less time with far fewer people. There's so much data that half the challenge is developing ways to process and manage it, and the possibilities and discoveries from that are endless. It's kind of awe inspiring to be honest.
Thanks for not having sponsorships in your videos. 🍻
But do you donate though lol
I prefer videos from the desk, because your position in-frame is better and more consistent, and it looks less cramped than the corner. You also have a habit of wearing cool t-shirts, so it's always good to be able to see them.
Babe wake up new gutsick gibbon video just dropped
Yes!!! It’s a great day when Erika uploads a new video!! I keep forgetting to watch for early release on patreon, dang it 😂
I'm better off not seeing that sabertooth skull up close, because, whenever I do, I keep wondering how it ended up with those molars.
They are there to see if you notice.
I can't tell, but it could be a Thylacosmilus, a marsupial with a super similar skull from a distance. It was a scavenger.
Your videos are always so entertaining! I know nothing of creationist folks or their silly ramblings, but I always learn something new whenever I click on a vid of yours.
Excellent work, as always, Erica. Keep up the pertinent and interesting content!
Liked and shared.
chimps probably didn't have a y chrom bottleneck like we have had
So to summarize the whole "Y chromosome precludes evolution" talk: Another case of YEC measurements separating humans from chimps falling completely flat when the same measurements are used to decide whether or not different species that are obviously closely related to each other are, in fact, closely related to each other (and also, the whole argument ignoring that there was an explanation from the start)
"Death of a Hypothesis"
by Gutsick Gibbon
Rated: 🤣🤣
Bye, bye, "Stands for Truthiness".
shame creationist will only pick out the lines they think fit their story and ignore the rest
Shame you won't read any of their published research in the ARJ
@@cosmictreason2242 when they release it in proper peer reviewed journals I'm sure we'll all get to read it
@@steveaustin4118 has already been done and you are free to read it but you're not doing it. Scared of thinking.
@@cosmictreason2242 go away and bore the pants of your fellow delusionals.
@@cosmictreason2242 - Not published. Just printed in their own in-house rag.
Subscribed so fast ❤😂
Thank you for your video. It was the only thing that helped me get back to sleep after the election results in my country today. It gave me something interesting to bring my attention back to when I started worrying. Gonna re-listen later to get the rest of the details.
@DoodleDabble - Are you French or do you live in _another_ country that's worrisome? The USA had a jolt today, too, with the Supreme Court decision that presidents are above the reach of the law. B^(
@@MossyMozart I’m French and American… double whammy this week 😵
is this a reupload or was it live before?
I think this is the one from yesterday that was marked Private and removed.
Reupload, possibly because the last video was initially private and did not get good views when it was made public.
@@JustinG1057if it was private yesterday and just re-uploaded as public today, then how could it have done poorly when public? Do you just say things to say them?
Reload! I accidentally released the other one at like 12am. I privated it and then upon rerelease it got killed in the algorithm so I just scrapped it and tried again
@@GutsickGibbon
Hey, why are my comments getting deleted?
Thanks for all your work in these videos! You are a great communicator!
I always love it when there is a new Erica video. It makes my day.
gorillaz poster is meta and deep
Or maybe she just likes the band?
I would like to hear more about the mechanism of sperm competition. As a layman who has watched this channel a long time. That kinda went over my head. How exactly do sperm compete. Are you saying the sperm themselves compete, or that the males in competing for females is what is meant by sperm competition? Anyone in these comments more educated than me, please feel free to make a fool of me. I would like an answer, so I can better understand what I just watched. thnks to any who answer.
Sperm competition as in between different male spermcells competing within the same female individual. As fertilization is not instant after sexual intercourse, there is a window of opportunity there for other sperm to get there first and win the eggcell insemination raffle (mostly by simply supplying more sperm).
@@PeppoMusic thank you for that. I felt that had to be it. But is that sperm all from one male or more. I wasn't aware that different sperm cells from the same male could carry different genetic information.
@@pardotkynes1No sorry should'vs made more clear that is different males. In chimps there are no exclusive mating rights for the females in a group. So when they are fertile, once every 36 days (close to our 21), they have a window of almost two weeks where they can have sexual intercourse with many different male partners, sex only last a few seconds. Fertizilation is not instantaneous, so there is plenty of room for the sperm of multiple men to compete within that timeframe.
That being said, the individual sperm cells from one male individual also compete against each other, of course. But that is not what is the relevant selection pressure here.
@@PeppoMusic - Does the same hold true for Bonobos? I wish that they were mentioned in the literature more often.
@@MossyMozart Don't know enough about Bonobo's tbh sorry. But they're mostly similar yes, insofar that the selection pressure between male individuals still occurs. I only know that they're even more promiscuous, have a very different social structure, and engage in more sexual activity even outside of the fertility period and outside of their clan. Lots of intercommunal mixing. But you'd have too look them up yourself. Google scholar and sci-hub are your friends, but start with Wikipedia for the basics.
Gutsick, you are amazing. Fun to watch and listen to, mind-bending to understand.
I was at pride yesterday this is the perfect thing to relax n recharge to while I play viddy games
Very Very cool, thank you! It would be amazing to see where the neanderthal y dna fits in.
lol @ gibbon enjoyig the fact that this different view exposes more of the shelf of skulls etc, while dummy viewer here is just 'oh that's what the whole gorillaz poster looks like'.
Thanks, always learn something by watching :)
0:40 I enjoyed the breakdown of what was on your shelf, for the record😂
So these creationists turned out to be talking a lot of balls, eh?
Not even the first time on this subject.
So it's a load of _old_ bollocks.
@kersebleptes1317 - YECs won't even admit that it was prehistoric *Dung Beetles*; who invented the ball _AND_ soccer, though they played by different rules.
thank you, Erika, as always.
one question that has been bugging me lately is what happened to all the plants during the flood? land plants generally don't do well fully submerged in seawater.
Nothing happened to them during the Flood, because it never happened.
As for the YEC position, I genuinely don't think I've heard a single one of them explain how an olive tree could be submerged for a whole year yet still have recognisable leaves for the dove to bring back to Noah to recognise. They generally seem to really wish people would forget about all the silly plants already, I'm sure the seeds survived and sprouted in the salty mud after the Flood subsided.
Miracles! 😂
It's not like we have millions of plant fossils proving their evolution also 🤷 (PS: that was sarcasm, we do)
Miracles! 😂
It's not like we have millions of plant fossils proving their evolution also 🤷 (PS: that was sarcasm, we do)
If the "Flood" covered all the land, the water would have frozen, as would everything on the Ark. This is the biggest defeater for this bit of folklore.
@@PromptedHawk1. Trees float. 2. The ark had rested for many weeks before the dove was sent out. 3. Olive trees bud.
Never have i been so invested in a specific study in science. Thank you for sharing!
That sperm competition drives differences in mutation rates is possibly the coolest thing about this to me. Many studies show that purifying selection is acting on the Y in chimps, and yet we see dramatic rearrangements in chromosome structure, indicating that there's a tug-of-war between two levels of selection: 1) selection to produce more sperm, which increases the number of cell divisions and hence the rate of mutation, and 2) selection *against* mutations, especially in coding regions, since these are normally deleterious. Which level wins out is a function of the strength of sperm competition; this likely explains why human and gorilla chromosomes are generally more stable with lower mutation rates than chimps and bonobos. In the latter, sperm competition is so important that it's driving up the mutation rate despite selection at the sequence level attempting to suppress it.
More similar than African and Asian elephants, lions and tigers and rats and mice
So I have a “getting into biology” question. I really want to have a change in skill. I’m 43 and have been bad off for a while now. Meaning a down mental state making me procrastinate working etc…
I’ve tried adult learning classes and I just get frustrated. I do ok on test but I don’t feel like it do. It’s a struggle. I misread things a lot and have this perpetual fog that looms in my mind. This being said I want to live and I want to make good money. I have to get back to how I was before I got this burnout 10 years ago. I want to be greater. I’ve been having a deep passion for biology in the last 2 years. Like a yearning for it. Given your expertise what is your potential to make and realistically what you make per year? Not you specifically, but anyone in your position? I’m sure any biologist can answer this. I just wanted more than a google reply and add some detail what I should do in my situation.
I really enjoy your personality and level of detail in your talks here.
Oh and congratulations on your marriage not too long ago (I think). I hope you’re living your dream. I’m trying to get there. It has felt always out of reach for me. I’m hoping to change that. 🤗.
Life is really hard.
It’s a big deal that you are persisting.
I am not a biologist. I think that in order to get a job in the biological sphere, you may need a Master's degree, but I could be dead wrong.
------------
What you might consider, though, that is biology-adjacent, is a career in the healthcare field. _Nursing:_ appropriate for males _&_ females. _Technicians:_ radiology / ultrasound / laboratory / operating room / veterinary. Therapists: physical / occupational / speech. Lots of other healthcare jobs, too. I think that at least some of these fields are currently short-staffed.
-------------
* Is there a college near you that you might want to attend? If not, contact the admissions departments of several to shop around. State schools are cheaper than private schools, though "cheaper" may be a relative term. Get their catalogs and carefully study them to know what will be expected of you in order to graduate. Until you give a school money, you are under no obligation to them, so be a thorough consumer and SHOP. Always choose accredited schools!
* Make an appointment with the guidance department of one or more schools to discuss all your options and financing possibilities, like state and federal grants, etc. (There can be some very niche grants, too, like a grant for a single mother of Hawaiian descent enrolled in environmental science - that kind of thing. - Just a made-up example - don't quote me.) The guidance counselors may know of jobs programs that will help you retrain and cover some of the costs. If you have a formal diagnosis - perhaps there are funds specifically for that. They can also help you see the pros and cons in different courses of study and help you narrow your focus.
* Get a notebook and write down your questions and the answers you are given. You will _not_ be able to remember all that info later. ^_^
* Are you a veteran? They have social workers who might be able to help you. I do not know if the VA has jobs programs or not.
* *Been-there-done-that-TIP* = Of the state schools, community colleges are the least expensive and may be close to where you live. Take the starting classes there and transfer to a 4-year school later on to save money.
* *Been-there-done-that-TIP* = To qualify for a degree, there are some classes that everyone must take, like English 101 and the like. If you really want to pursue college, you can start with those kinds of classes right now and can always transfer the credit to whatever colleges you go to in the future.
* *Been-there-done-that-TIP* = Of all the classes I have taken, the most stress-free, laid back classes were the night classes at a community college. I took English 101 and 102 that way as well as some math classes. Bonus - I met another guy in English 102 who became my best friend { Jon! }. Summer classes are also less stressful and go faster.
* *Been-there-done-that-TIP* = Textbooks are crazy expensive. Whenever you can, buy used books. They may even already come with great notes in the margin! However, if a class you want to take switches to a new edition or a different book altogether, used books will not help.
*_All the best of luck!_*
Weird timing-I was just randomly wondering about Y chromosomes and planning on poking around about it. Thanks for doing the video!
Be careful with the poking. That area is rather delicate.
Thank you for the great information and for your integrity!
Omg this is so interesting !!
Just when i needed to do a lot of dishes, yippieh 🎉
Awesome. I am having some arguments now with some YEC's
Keep up the good work.
Other than that have a nice day.
Ps. I like you at your desk.
Ta ta.
Thanks for spreading great scientific knowledge!
Thanks yet again.
I have two degrees in Psychology and Criminal Justice, my passion now is Ancient history. Science obviously always had much respect for and Carl Sagan. It's good to see Zoomers or late millennials, whatever demographic she's in, to advocate Science. The bullshit today is terrifying and akin to 1930s propaganda.
Majority is a misnomer, lol, dam
@Ford-wt8rn - I agree. I fear for the near future with science-deniers climbing to power. Fingers, toes, and eyes all tightly crossed for our children. Ms Erika G. Gibbon is a tough and truthful fighter for reality.
@@MossyMozart I just hope they don't find a pretext to shut her down.
Interesting stuff and you are very good and easy to listen to, I am really in awe of your clear speech and pronunciation. However I am a bit shocked that there is still a need to debate creationists in the USA. Here in Germany are so few of them that they just get ignored, as far as I can tell. Which of course can be explained by fewer evangelicals due to historic reasons.
I'm living in the DEEP South.... Science is winning down here. It gets better every generation. Unfortunately, I lost a friend to the Baptist.... she tried to tell me tell me some crazy shit. I asked her one question... just ONE (that blew her statement out of the water) She said she didn't know.... I haven't her from her since. 😊
"Science is winning down here."
You mean in the sense that antivaccers keep dying of covid? Because you people are literally banning schools now.
It's not a good time to be a creationist
I love your stuff. I still think you spend too much time debunking stupidity but so be it. I found the pace of this a bit quick. It may have been my lack of knowledge in the topic. I got the feeling the sperm competition caused the difference but was not clear on why and how this occurred. It seemed you assumed we all understood the process. Again the problem may be with me the last formal exposure I had to human genetics was 50 years ago.
I googled it. Would love a Gutsick Gibbon explanation.
Thanks for the video
Great explanation, I love these videos. Cant say u don’t warn them!!!
Go back to the original rendition of the opening song please!! And the video is great in spite of much of it being over my head.
I _REALLY_ miss that intro, too. B^(
@@MossyMozart -- The original rendition of that song is just one of those simple pleasures in life!!
Watched it yesterday, but here for another view, like, and comment.
9:48 is a hilariously clever analysis. Males and Females being differently human is such a wild and cogent way of explaining how they don't understand the research, and how you do understand it.
(Scary when you remember how they don't see females having equal rights...)
What a fascinating discussion!
Can't wait to see your first published research paper, Erika!
Second the excitement ❤
Or at least her thesis!
@@MossyMozart A PhD thesis is supposed to be at publication standard in any case (not opening with "Hello, my name is ___" as a rule).
Erika is so cool! ❤😍
I am often frustrated to see americans and even scientists of all kinds never mention Linneus in these arguments. It's so strange how much Darwin is mentioned, but not the father of taxonomy..who like you mention commented on our similarities to apes and categorised us as one from the start!
That we swedes were the one's to pioneer that scientific revolution was both pure chance (the french were twiddling their thumbs and couldn't agree on a system from what I've read) and incredibly interesting since our country was so late to form (the 1500s were the official start of Sweden as a self determined united nation) and until the 1700s were a mainly war focused nation.
Linnaeus didn't say how species came to be, he just described them and put them in groups of related species. Yes, that was important, but others before him had done similar things in a more limited way. He's not nearly as important to the history of evolution as Darwin and Wallace's description of natural selection.
And, remember, Linnaeus was the first one to claim that humans are separated into biological subspecies with different morphologies, intellectual abilities and personality traits - what shortly became the "races" of humans. His work fed the explicit race theories of Kant and Hume, and led to a couple of hundred years of nearly everyone believing that races were distinct groups which had a biological basis - one of the most widespread and successful gaslighting projects in western history. He was also wrong about other things - but that one blatant error, based on nothing but European prejudices and tall tales from explorers, helped lead to immense amounts of human misery and death. So he may not be an unalloyed Swedish hero - he's certainly not one of my heroes.
Thank you Erica
So many of the differences between species are not attributable to created kinds but what Krause and Dawkins point out often. The fact that sameness or, as Lawrence puts it, nothing is unstable and not just difficult to maintain but impossible. So there in a nutshell is the argument for how evolution as stories go is a better explanation than the creation stories we tried to use earlier in our histories and we probably did so even more so, much more so in prehistory.
So yes that is why religious beliefs are so hard to maintain. They’re inherently unstable and will continue to break down into differences. And that is why religions mostly resemble schisms more than they do created kinds. They all came from the same origin of trying to explain.
Gutsick Gibbon explains y
Y? Because she can!
@@MossyMozart 🐵
Y'know, it's funny. There's just one gene responsible for determining primary sex characteristics, and it doesn't actually need to be on the Y chromosome. Small homologous portions of the Y chromosome normally recombine with the X chromosome during meiosis, and the "testis-determining factor" is so close to this region that it can sometimes end up crossing over to the X chromosome. If this happens, the gene can be inherited naturally, without any sort of mutation involved, resulting in an XX offspring with a typical "male" phenotype. It's literally just random chance because the Y chromosome has a bit of size variance, which to me is a solid point against the notion that these chromosomes are this unwavering ultimate biological determinator. The only reason this isn't more common is that the genes responsible for gamete production are totally separate and don't end up crossing over. If this could result in fertile individuals, it'd continue to be passed down from the X chromosome naturally.
Hormones are also important, if not more.
I love you so much. You are brilliant and will get your PhD soon!
So this just came to mind when you were talking about baramins: Were the animals on Noah's ark not evolved at all? Were the baramins unchanged from Creation to the Flood, only beginning to adapt to various environments after the Flood? What's the YEC position?
I believe they’d generally say that a lot of the fossil diversity you see was post-“Fall,” pre-flood divergence, and a lot of the modern/Cenozoic diversity was post-flood divergence…and that God would have selected two of each kind with maximal genetic dissimilarity to go on the ark, as a zoo might compare the genetic lineage of two giraffes for a breeding program.
They say the floor was around 2,500 BC (4,500 years ago) 🤷 we got a direct continuum of human records and writing since then, proving again that there was no flood.
They say the floor was around 2,500 BC (4,500 years ago) 🤷 we got a direct continuum of human records and writing since then, proving again that there was no flood.
@@djublonskopfthat's pretty good. Credit for trying to understand the opposition. I can't say the same for most commenters here
@@djublonskopfalthough not necessarily maximal dissimilarity so much as maximal potential for adaptation. A chihuahua and Great Dane have lots of dissimilarity but you will not generate all the other dog breeds by mixing them. Even if they could mate. They still need to have the genetic potential that will be segregated in their offspring
Hah! Hi! I just checked UA-cam for a video to link in an answer about reproduction, and this video is going right into it!
I enjoyed this video. Educational and interesting at the same time. Well delivered.
Well done as always 😊
Chimpanzees aren’t our closest relatives though. We’re more related to Bonobos
Bonobos always get forgotten, it seems.
@@l0rf - Yes, they do. I would love to learn a lot more about them and their motto, "Make Love, Not War".
@@MossyMozart I prefer that over "I will eat your face and maybe your children" of Chimpanzees any day.
I was under the impression we share equal amounts of DNA with both species. We split with them then they split again.
hello everybody
I love the Gorillaz background! I’ve been loving your content for a while, but now I like it more lolz
Great video as always
YECs just use MUH HOLY BUK as a source, GG uses references that are valid.
CHECKMATE FUNDIES!
Should be embarrassed 🤦♂️
@@cosmictreason2242 yes you should be
What I don't understand about the creationists' standpoint: wouldn't it be much more omnipotent to have the empty void suddemly fill wirh physics, and this set of particles and interacting basic rules defines a whole universe, developing and evolving into fantastic things like quasars, planetary systems and our whole biosphere, including us?
While their peception of divinity resembles an old man micromanaging pieces together to make new creatures, like a child playing with a heap of dismembered actionfigures?
I think the fact is that they simply don't have the capacity to understand these things. There's also the "intellectualism is bad" standpoint where all intelligent reasoning is seen as suspect and not to be trusted but that stems from the same inability to understand or to engage with a topic. Let's not forget that the church has always needed an ignorant populace from which to derive its revenue.
Thanks for sharing.
I never knew your vids drew out so many apologist weirdos. I feel for you.
Creationist stupidity is proof of Stupid Design Theory.
Lol
"Hominids that are not in my primary linage" she says implying that they are in some of the audience's primary linage.
No, she means there are other hominids that have gone extinct. That’s why they’re not in her and our lineage.
What we have here is a happy Gibbon thoroughly enjoying one of their favorite pastimes.😂
Thank You!