Why Some of the Rainbow is Missing

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,7 тис.

  • @dod108d
    @dod108d Рік тому +6515

    It's also worth mentioning that helium was first discovered as an unknown spectral line in the Sun's spectrum, few decades before its actual discovery on Earth

    • @GTAVictor9128
      @GTAVictor9128 Рік тому +620

      Hence the name Helium - derived from "Helios", the Greek word for sun.

    • @dracomaster4
      @dracomaster4 Рік тому +126

      I was sad this fact wasn’t mentioned.

    • @some_guy7734
      @some_guy7734 Рік тому +61

      helium gives off a pale yellow spectral line too, like sodium

    • @jackgenewtf
      @jackgenewtf Рік тому +12

      And now we are running out of the stuff.

    • @nayhem
      @nayhem Рік тому +39

      "The spectral line is coming from *inside* your atmosphere!"

  • @jkzero
    @jkzero Рік тому +1617

    I really liked how Joe's shirt colors shifted from red to violet during the video, nice touch. I live in Heidelberg, where Bunsen and Kirchhoff made their great discovery. On the busiest street in town there is a plate, outside the building where their lab was located, with the caption "In this building in 1859 Kirchhoff applied his spectral analysis, founded with Bunsen, to the Sun and the stars, thus opening up the chemistry of the universe." I look at it and smile every time I walk by, I see it as the place where astrophysics was born.

    • @satyabratshanu8815
      @satyabratshanu8815 Рік тому +140

      He blue shifted, which means he is coming near us. 😊

    • @AlexM-xj7qd
      @AlexM-xj7qd Рік тому +45

      It changed?! Lol I didn't notice

    • @rosebudmelissa
      @rosebudmelissa Рік тому +13

      I saw red, yellow, teal, and purple. Not sure if I missed any.

    • @ronald3836
      @ronald3836 Рік тому +19

      @@AlexM-xj7qd Me neither. I think we wouldn't do well as scientists.

    • @jkzero
      @jkzero Рік тому +24

      @@ronald3836 honestly, I only noticed at the end of the video: when I saw Joe on a purple shirt I thought "it would have been nice if he had continuously changed his shirt to the rainbow colors" so I went back and watched the video again. It was very satisfying to see the increasing wavelength colors and I said "thank you @besmart"

  • @terrybradford3727
    @terrybradford3727 Рік тому +3260

    This is the best explanation of what red and blue shift is. I "knew " what it meant, but seeing the example with the spectrum made everything click. Awesome video

    • @unglud
      @unglud Рік тому +85

      Indeed, I was always like, how do we know it moving away and not just red from the beginning? Now I know!

    • @inkynebula
      @inkynebula Рік тому +10

      I came here to write this ❤

    • @didack1419
      @didack1419 Рік тому +61

      That sensation when you get a deeper sudden intuition about something that you thought you already understood well-enough.

    • @KaiserMattTygore927
      @KaiserMattTygore927 Рік тому +7

      Same here, exactly what you mean, too.

    • @EngASax
      @EngASax Рік тому +4

      True 👍🏻

  • @FranciscoJG
    @FranciscoJG Рік тому +146

    Just a note: if someone has access to a prism, that's better than diffraction grating for building the spectroscope.
    The light is diffracted in several orders through the grating, so it's quite common to find second-order lines mixing up with first-order ones. Also, that makes the intensity of the spectrum much lower.

  • @paulcooper8818
    @paulcooper8818 Рік тому +1761

    Imagine how exciting it was for Bunsen and Kirchhoff when they realized what caused missing lines, and then the subsequent verification as they mapped various elements.

    • @_kopcsi_
      @_kopcsi_ Рік тому +30

      well, they didn’t know it. many many years later when Einstein discovered the quantum nature of light (photons) we have realised that electron structures are behind this mystery.

    • @paulcooper8818
      @paulcooper8818 Рік тому +132

      @@_kopcsi_ Alright, just for you Poindexter.
      Imagine how exciting it was for Bunsen and Kirchhoff when they correlated the missing lines to the emission lines, and then the subsequent verification as they mapped various elements.

    • @boxoftin
      @boxoftin Рік тому +35

      ​@@paulcooper8818They may not have known the reason for it but it definitely must have been exciting.

    • @JetstreamGW
      @JetstreamGW Рік тому +18

      Imagine if Slipher pissed himself when he realized how fast things were moving :D

    • @kingglassmouse7873
      @kingglassmouse7873 Рік тому +2

      @@_kopcsi_ 🤓🤓🤓

  • @SOMEGUYANDREW
    @SOMEGUYANDREW Рік тому +25

    I love it how well the explanation is built step by step and how it all ties together

  • @ricdavid
    @ricdavid Рік тому +285

    This is like the perfect science video in terms of actually teaching a concept and its history and what it's used for. And this stuff always blows my mind - obviously everything we know now had to come from somewhere and was discovered by people working with a lot less than what we have now (it's WHY we have what we have now) but it still kills me that dudes with top hats and bushy mustaches were able to just burn some stuff and realize they could figure out what the sun was made of.

    • @extragoogleaccount6061
      @extragoogleaccount6061 Рік тому +12

      This video could keep going too....spectral line emissions were also really important in discovery process that eventually went from questions about black-body radiation to the idea of quantized energy and the whole field of quantum mechanics!

    • @WiseandVegan
      @WiseandVegan Рік тому

      Hi smart people, the "elite" rulers have fooled you and enslaved you; this is your story 👉 The Connections (2021) [short documentary] 💖

    • @nerdjournal
      @nerdjournal 11 місяців тому +3

      it's a beautifully simplified explanation for a beautiful discovery that shows us our beautiful universe through the beauty of the color spectrum. It makes me sad that people feel they need a god for beauty to exist or to not feel so small. It makes me feel as big as the universe, knowing that our tiny little speck of dust floating in a sun beam holds smaller specks still that can unlock such mysteries so vast. We are only as small as knowledge, both miniscule and infinite.

  • @SinHurr
    @SinHurr Рік тому +207

    It was me. Sorry. I needed a snack.

    • @void_p
      @void_p 7 місяців тому +12

      we all technically eat the sun

    • @D9fjg
      @D9fjg 6 місяців тому +15

      Don't worry dude, we all need a *_light_* snack occasionally
      You're not you when you're hungry, am I right?

    • @themidimaster3403
      @themidimaster3403 5 місяців тому +2

      Skittles?🤨

    • @Sepezzah-wh7cg
      @Sepezzah-wh7cg 5 місяців тому +2

      Hey, save me some

    • @Hysteriette
      @Hysteriette 5 місяців тому

      divide wirh us

  • @zhubajie6940
    @zhubajie6940 Рік тому +862

    I still remember asking my 4th grade teacher how we knew what the atmosphere of Mars was made of, for at the time, we had only had the flyby of Mariner 4. To her credit, she said she didn't know, made me research it at our public library (with the help of librarians there), and I had to give a report on this very subject.

    • @cherrydragon3120
      @cherrydragon3120 Рік тому +71

      Thats nice. Teachers here probably wouldn't care enough to want a report back

    • @capedkat
      @capedkat Рік тому +49

      Now that's a great teacher! If only all teachers were like this.

    • @Idontknow4
      @Idontknow4 Рік тому +4

      how did that go, like how in depth did you get into it

    • @sozeytozey
      @sozeytozey Рік тому +28

      @@capedkat Takes the right student as well, to be fair

    • @alanhermesjr9949
      @alanhermesjr9949 Рік тому +7

      W teacher

  • @andyhill7
    @andyhill7 Рік тому +57

    Ten extra points for Joe for changing shirt color to follow the spectrum!

  • @kaibroeking9968
    @kaibroeking9968 Рік тому +438

    Kirchhoff and Bunsen discovered two new elements when the spa at the small town of Bad Dürkheim commisioned a spectroscopic analysis of their mineral spring water. One element had a ruby red spectral line, so they christened it "Rubidium". The other element they discovered there, they called "Caesium" after the Latin word for blueish-grey.

    • @chillphil967
      @chillphil967 Рік тому +8

      TIL 👍

    • @WiseandVegan
      @WiseandVegan Рік тому

      Hi smart people, the "elite" rulers have fooled you and enslaved you; this is your story 👉 The Connections (2021) [short documentary] 💖

    • @ginaroussos
      @ginaroussos 4 місяці тому

      Ok, maybe I’m just dumb, but how did they “burn” the water to make a flame with light that could be analyzed? You can boil water, but that doesn’t produce any light, as far as I can tell

  • @mambim.lee5781
    @mambim.lee5781 Рік тому +2

    This is dope dude I love having a place on UA-cam to find scientific stuff this specific

  • @Isaac_L..
    @Isaac_L.. Рік тому +60

    Senior chemistry major here. Great job explaining this. One really cool thing that uses these concepts is ICP-AES (inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy). It as an analytical instrument that essentially burns the crap out of whatever sample you put in and measures the light that comes out. The cool thing is that it is both a qualitative and quantitative technique since it measures the frequency of emissions. This allows you to do cool stuff like find how much of a certain atom is in your water for instance. And it's extremely sensitive, like more accurate than ppb sensitive.

    • @Arycke
      @Arycke Рік тому +1

      Tbh ICP-MS is better for quantifying ppb results without addition of internal standards in standard AES/OES.

    • @Arycke
      @Arycke Рік тому +3

      Stating that ICP techniques can tell you "How much of an atom is in ___" is somewhat misleading. E.g. there are isotopes of elements that are commonly elucidated, and they are technically different atoms, since they don't have the same amount of constituent particles, and ICP spectroscopy won't differentiate between the two.
      Atoms, or ions, are indeed excited in the argon plasma, then intensity of the light emitted when the electrons in the atoms or ions return to the ground state, or a lower energy is measured.
      I know you may have simplified the explanation for those casually reading/watching, but just wanted to throw out the details.

    • @GovilGirl
      @GovilGirl Рік тому +2

      ❤ a good technical fight that is way over my head now. I see this as a marker of a solid science educational video. This little comment thread is like walking by teachers lounge and overhearing professors arguing over specific words, sentences, or points in each other's lessons.

    • @GovilGirl
      @GovilGirl Рік тому +2

      Also, is this how serum labs are run for metals, vitamins, gases, and medications? If so, why are we not running a "full spectrum" analysis using ai instead of hunting and pecking through the spectrum for results on specific bands?

    • @monicarenee7949
      @monicarenee7949 Рік тому +1

      @@GovilGirl you like that kinda stuff? People arguing the semantics of words gets so annoying to me lol, I have a love/hate relationship with the comment section

  • @ThouAppo
    @ThouAppo Рік тому +6

    This is so intuitive video, thanknyou for making it, suddenly everything clicked in my head when you were explaining about the redshift

  • @Dave-su5cd
    @Dave-su5cd Рік тому +309

    This is so fascinating. when i was a kid i was almost always wondering if you can cancel out light somehow and was wondering how, but now i know its actually possible.

    • @kbee225
      @kbee225 Рік тому +21

      You can cancel out light. But not using spectral absorption. It's a wave, you can create destructive interference to cancel the wave.

    • @Dave-su5cd
      @Dave-su5cd Рік тому +6

      @@kbee225 so technically theres a way to become invisible.
      although it would be a tedious process.

    • @skorp5677
      @skorp5677 Рік тому +7

      Works for sound as well. This is called noise cancelling :)

    • @kbee225
      @kbee225 Рік тому +18

      @@Dave-su5cd it only works for one wavelength at a time. And no cancelling light will not make you invisible it will make you look like a dark silhouette

    • @thomaslane1547
      @thomaslane1547 Рік тому +9

      To be invisible, you'd need active camoflage such that, when light hits you on one side, it sends out matching light on the opposite side.

  • @bigchungus914
    @bigchungus914 Рік тому +7

    3:16 this is an extremely intelligent and impresive way of determining the sun's makeup

  • @r_viana
    @r_viana Рік тому +15

    Nice touch changing the t-shirt colors! Great video as always, thank you sir!

  • @ilghiz
    @ilghiz Рік тому +6

    Best video about spectrography, in depth but simple. Most videos only mention spectrography or touch the surface. Great job, a huuuuge thank you!

  • @Rebellum1
    @Rebellum1 Рік тому +69

    The home made spectrometer was SUCH a good idea, that really helped me to better understand the topic, you should definitely include more demonstrations for the camera in future videos

  • @kaishimagaki1488
    @kaishimagaki1488 Рік тому +4

    I love your program! These are always fascinating and fun! I also love some hidden codes, like the missing Cooper's emission color on your T-shirts :)

  • @AEAG9YT_
    @AEAG9YT_ Рік тому +662

    imagine if your favourite shade of a colour just didn't appear in a rainbow one day

    • @coemcoem7070
      @coemcoem7070 Рік тому +7

      Your

    • @itsgonnabeokai
      @itsgonnabeokai Рік тому +63

      if you like magenta it never is there

    • @AEAG9YT_
      @AEAG9YT_ Рік тому +2

      @@coemcoem7070 nerd

    • @BonaparteStyle
      @BonaparteStyle Рік тому +13

      @@itsgonnabeokai It's spot is halfway to the other one on double rainbow. (not exactly magenta but violet is pretty close)

    • @itsnick37
      @itsnick37 Рік тому +13

      Maybe a new color just shows up someday, hard to even imagine it….. :P

  • @NIX-FLIX
    @NIX-FLIX Рік тому +12

    This is one of the coolest things I’ve ever learned. Thank you Joe!

  • @Chris-ok4zo
    @Chris-ok4zo Рік тому +484

    In my view, this is the DaVinci Code of physics. Also finally explains to me how science dudes find out the elemental compostion of far-off celestial bodies without being able to go there in person.

    • @smurfyday
      @smurfyday Рік тому +6

      Da Vinci Code's overrated. Much boring ado about nothing

    • @DemPilafian
      @DemPilafian Рік тому +7

      The combo of science and history in this video was very informative and made for captivating storytelling. 👍

    • @Kyle-nm1kh
      @Kyle-nm1kh Рік тому

      Well, only the elements capable of burning. What if there are elements not being burned? Also, since it takes time for light to travel, what if we are seeing elements from the past that no longer exist within that fireball?
      And since he said to "be curious" how do we know the angle of trajectory of motion? Surely it's not as simple as "away" and "towards" since there are 180 degrees of each. And I wonder how the angle would change the data of the shift too. Sorry I'm a math guy and I don't understand the geometry.

    • @anteshell
      @anteshell Рік тому +11

      @@Kyle-nm1kh False. Burning has nothing to do with the spectroscopy. Electromagnetic radiation has everything to do. Literally every element has their own electromagnetic fingerprint observable with a spectroscope. Read the wikipedia article about it. It is quite comprehensive but doesn't mention "burning" even once, because as I said, a chemical reaction with oxygen is irrelevant to the spectroscopy.
      angle can be determined by how the object moves angularly in the sky. The red/blue shift gives the speed vector towards you and the rest is simple vector math.

    • @eljanrimsa5843
      @eljanrimsa5843 Рік тому +1

      @@Kyle-nm1kh if you are math guy you have to wrap your head around the fact that space itself expands. if everything moves away and objects move away faster proportional to how far they are away from us, the only explanation is that space itself expands

  • @laurayoubetcha7275
    @laurayoubetcha7275 Рік тому +2

    Love this topic! Excellent touch with the different colored Tshirts too Joe 😊

  • @pingidjit
    @pingidjit Рік тому +91

    This episode was MINDBLOWING! Makes rainbows even more awesome. Totally amazed.

    • @cherrydragon3120
      @cherrydragon3120 Рік тому

      Its really cool to figure out through missing colors in rainbows what elements are in stars or planetary atmospheres wich might give us potential worlds to colonize, or find extraterrestial life forms on other planets.

  • @orparag6525
    @orparag6525 Рік тому +15

    7:45 looks like Netflix's Tudum opener

  • @JK-df6do
    @JK-df6do Рік тому +12

    Even the spectrum of your t-shirts throughout the video was missing a couple colors. Nicely done.

    • @valiroime
      @valiroime Рік тому

      I did seem to notice that it kept changing colors.

  • @NoSuffix
    @NoSuffix Рік тому +6

    Although I learned about prism and spectrums decades ago, it is still amazing to delve into the details and see how tiny phenomena can lead to great discoveries about the big universe. Glory to all those curious and smart minds!

  • @shawnholbrook7278
    @shawnholbrook7278 Рік тому +17

    I learn a lot of things through context, but I am very happy about the way you explain the specifics to us. It leads to a better understanding, thank you!

  • @zotechgaming1095
    @zotechgaming1095 Рік тому +9

    I always wondered how we found out what things are made of so far away in the galaxy. Thank you for this info!

  • @KuruGDI
    @KuruGDI Рік тому +159

    Hydrogen as one electron. Helium has two electrons. The electrons of both atoms sit in the "K" shell.
    So I wonder: Do both atoms have the same spectrum?
    EDIT: The internet says no. But why is it that way?

    • @besmart
      @besmart  Рік тому +189

      Good question! Those electrons may seem interchangeable, but the nucleus and the atom as a whole influences the electromagnetic field around each atom, so although those electrons are in the “same” orbital, they require different energies to jump out of ground state

    • @boxoftin
      @boxoftin Рік тому +14

      Because their nucleus is different and electrons are bound to the nucleus in helium differently to that in hydrogen, that's what I think happens as I have interpreted it in my lectures of atomic structure.

    • @cryingwater
      @cryingwater Рік тому +29

      @@besmart I see! Because the nucleus pulls on the electrons differently, which makes the energy required for the electron to jump state also different! So fascinating.

    • @garethdean6382
      @garethdean6382 Рік тому +15

      Helium has twice the central charge, this makes it a smaller atom than hydrogen, and thus require more energy to ionize. And with TWO electrons there's the spectrum for the first, AND the second electron, which aren't the same since once the first electron moves up an orbital, it'll leave the second experiencing even more of the nucleus' charge. And the situation only gets worse for heavier atoms.

    • @karlkarlsson9126
      @karlkarlsson9126 Рік тому +5

      I came here for the girls.

  • @PrestageP
    @PrestageP 5 місяців тому +1

    This is the first time i have seen this subject matter in a video. It's not very often that a UA-cam video blows me away with how important and amazing the subject is. But this is top tier those 2 scientists back in the day had absolutely no idea how important their discovery would turn out to be. To be able to figure out every single element that the furthest things in our observable universe is it's amazing i can't do it justice. Thank you for this video. You have just lit a fire under this old man and i HAVE TO KNOW MORE about this it's fascinating to me.

  • @besmart
    @besmart  Рік тому +693

    UPDATE: Want to make your own DIY spectrometer? There's directions down in the description!
    Something is stealing colors from the rainbow… and we're here to solve that mystery 😎
    If you read this, go hit that like button!!

    • @niiii_niiii
      @niiii_niiii Рік тому +2

      Jooooeee❤

    • @drstone3418
      @drstone3418 Рік тому

      I thought light Waves don't exist independent of our brains. And you don't understand why our brains can't identify images faster then they can be processed just like you don't understand why no animals have wheels. Signals cells actually have wheels

    • @Blue.star1
      @Blue.star1 Рік тому +3

      Why didn't the bunsen guys get Nobel prize

    • @astonpiche9532
      @astonpiche9532 Рік тому +3

      Please explain how you made the spectroscope

    • @jimbolino
      @jimbolino Рік тому +1

      the audio is too loud, its clipping

  • @everbran503
    @everbran503 Рік тому +21

    😂 His shirt changes colors throughout like the 🌈

  • @riddhichakraborty4890
    @riddhichakraborty4890 Рік тому +19

    We made a spectroscope using a diffraction grating, and it was a small part of a compact disc. Pretty incredible.

    • @PurtyPurple
      @PurtyPurple 7 місяців тому

      You just made me realize why CD's have that holographic sheen. According to the video the properties of diffraction grating are due to numerous small grooves, and in CDs the data is encoded in numerous small grooves. Mind blown moment.

  • @Specifix5
    @Specifix5 Рік тому +8

    Imagine scanning the barcode and buying the entire universe

  • @MattDavis5
    @MattDavis5 Рік тому +24

    Is very cool to hear how one observation can lead to so much discovery!

    • @extragoogleaccount6061
      @extragoogleaccount6061 Рік тому +2

      This video could keep going too....spectral line emissions were also really important in discovery process that eventually went from questions about black-body radiation to the idea of quantized energy and the whole field of quantum mechanics!

    • @madhououinkyoma
      @madhououinkyoma Рік тому +1

      Standing on the shoulders of giants

  • @billbadson7598
    @billbadson7598 6 місяців тому +1

    The amazing thing about this, to me, is how easy it might have been for nobody to really notice, or to put much thought into, the little black lines, and how much we wouldn’t be able to do now as a result.
    It makes me wonder if there aren’t millions and millions of potential little eureka moments, relatively accessible with no or with basic tools, that could just happen to be discovered one day and lead to entirely new technologies.

  • @TheSkystrider
    @TheSkystrider Рік тому +10

    Thanks Joe! I needed this refresher cuz I couldn't remember how absorption and emission spectrums tell us about the makeup of exoplanet atmospheres and stars.

  • @almosh3271
    @almosh3271 11 місяців тому +1

    What an informative video. Bravo Joe !!!

  • @rianby64
    @rianby64 Рік тому +5

    It's amazing! Just amazing how complex concepts you explain here so easily! Thanks a lot!

  • @juliaconnell
    @juliaconnell Рік тому +1

    wow - this really helped me to understand a lot of stuff heard over the years - like a really important jigsaw piece that lets me see the whole picture really differently - massive paradigm shift - *thank you*

  • @mattp4953
    @mattp4953 Рік тому +7

    Great video.
    Around 8:00 you say "physics basically becomes cryptography", while the captions read "physics basically becomes cryology". I was also wondering what you meant by that metaphor.
    If we take RSA encryption, I have seen a lot of metaphors that liken it to two painters mixing pigments, representing the two prime factors (one each for the private and public key) and recovering the original pigments from one combined color is really hard, as is getting back the original two pigments. Would the metaphor in this case liken the different element's subtraction from the light wavelength to prime factors? Or is it more in general that all the information is in there (the spectra), just kind of gunked up, as data similarly is for encryption.
    Would love to see your take on applied cryptography, or the next step of quantum resistant cryptography algorithms (more commonly known as "Post-Quantum Cryptography") in the future.

  • @GregStrike
    @GregStrike Рік тому +2

    I knew OF most of this, but, this video brought a lot of insight, clarity and tied it together. Loved seeing the red shift in the spectrograph! Awesome storytelling and great explanation! Thank you!!

  • @ahorrell
    @ahorrell Рік тому +4

    Came for the missing rainbow, left with an actual understanding of how red-shifting works. This video promised something interesting and delivered something fascinating

  • @DeirdreSM
    @DeirdreSM Рік тому +22

    One of the "search for life on Mars" experiments on the Viking Lander was a gas chromatograph mass spectrometer (adorably nicknamed the "green-colored Martian sniffer"). My dad was one of the scientists who worked on it.

    • @KristovMars
      @KristovMars Рік тому +2

      I love this!
      People have this idea that science (and other academic fields) is just boring stuffy people doing nerdy dry research - but I've met so many people in specialist disciplines with a great sense of humour, and joyous passion for what they're doing.
      Keep being awesome, fellow nerds!

  • @guybrush1701
    @guybrush1701 Рік тому +15

    0:56 "Yes, that Bunsen." *Proceeds to NOT show us a picture of the Muppet"
    How dare you, Joe? How dare you?
    😂

  • @unsafeaccount8516
    @unsafeaccount8516 Рік тому +2

    Fantastic video, great explanation of the blue/red shift! It's not easy to make science approachable, but you guys seriously rock it!

  • @StiggyAzalea
    @StiggyAzalea Рік тому +12

    0:37 how fast is this imaginary camera moving to scale

    • @NC_Isro_64
      @NC_Isro_64 Рік тому +6

      Several thousand light years per secound

    • @NotsoBussy
      @NotsoBussy Рік тому +3

      ​@@NC_Isro_64Millions or 100 000s

  • @MindLaboratory
    @MindLaboratory Рік тому +2

    This is one of your better videos - I love the history, hands-on demo, then projection to the future. Really well done. Changing through a rainbow of shirts through the video, nice touch.

  • @morphig
    @morphig Рік тому +6

    Amazing. It’s like Joe read my mind. Halfway through the video I was thinking: “How are we sure that those colors correspond to an element? Doesn’t red/blue shift affect it?”
    Then he explains what it is and how it happens 🤯

  • @lostmountainresearchco
    @lostmountainresearchco Рік тому +1

    Imagine how wild discovering that was… “On god, we found that zaza. That missing link. Our experiments were bussin frfr”

  • @NickPershyn
    @NickPershyn Рік тому +1

    I was looking for a video like this to show to a friend some time ago. I am glad you made it. There are still many people who does not know how the world work and it is good to have these simple and easily verifiable paths that lead scientists to the modern conclusions. I had good environment, where I learned things the way they are the first time, however many people are not that lucky and they need simple guide to discover the world. Spectroscope is one of those instruments that is simple and that everyone should build and watch into for themselves.

  • @thebutterflythatstamps
    @thebutterflythatstamps Рік тому +3

    Hi Joe. I just wanted to say that I love your videos. I just wanted to make a suggestion for one of your future videos. I think that the Turritopsis Dohrnii or the 'immortal jellyfish' would be a fascinating topic to discuss.

  • @mikemurphy80
    @mikemurphy80 8 місяців тому +2

    This is the missing piece for me to understand so many things I’ve heard about the cosmos. THANK YOU!

  • @projectbutter6930
    @projectbutter6930 Рік тому +4

    Somebody's taking the Rainbow!?
    Now who's work would this be of?
    Maybe they work in a huge group?
    But maybe a group so small at the same time that they couldn't take too much at once?
    *GASP*
    THE LEPRECHAUNS!!

  • @marvijain14
    @marvijain14 Рік тому +1

    This was the best explanation of spectral lines😊😊❤😊

  • @YEWCHENGYINMoe
    @YEWCHENGYINMoe Рік тому +60

    your shirt is getting bluer

    • @charky6683
      @charky6683 8 місяців тому +7

      he is approaching us.

    • @DesertDweller1
      @DesertDweller1 6 місяців тому +1

      What is "blue"?

    • @abhi22
      @abhi22 6 місяців тому

      it goes from red to violet

    • @Chasemcc4096
      @Chasemcc4096 5 місяців тому

      @@DesertDweller1 is that a joke?

  • @lukeytron
    @lukeytron 6 місяців тому +2

    Narrator starts the video with "hey smart people". Me: "looks like I'm in the wrong place"

  • @roobussbjrn
    @roobussbjrn Рік тому +4

    Its Crazy you guys keep producing these Amqzing videos

  • @ohadregev
    @ohadregev Рік тому +1

    Really good explanation. I now understand for the 1 time like 5-6 things I heard about so many times and accepted so I can hear the larger story but never understood what the actual method was doing. Thanks!

  • @NateSchoonoversAdventures
    @NateSchoonoversAdventures Рік тому +5

    So cool! I would love to see a DIY high-resolution spectroscope. How do they get those long spectra grids?

  • @EntropicEcho
    @EntropicEcho Рік тому +1

    Damn, a lot of things I knew just a bit about suddenly really clicked, great video, thanks!

  • @sonicsupersam7793
    @sonicsupersam7793 Рік тому +4

    just accidentally did my science homework lmaooooo

  • @Zibanu
    @Zibanu Рік тому

    Joe's t-shirts blue-shifting is such a great touch!! A sartorial emission spectrum. Really enjoyed the video - great job as always!

  • @blackeagle1985
    @blackeagle1985 Рік тому +4

    It's kinda funny that my physics teacher told us about this phenomenon less than 2 hours ago. The Universe works in mysterious ways.....

  • @hotflashfoto
    @hotflashfoto Рік тому +1

    This video has been brought to you by the Four-Color Shirt Crew: Ketchup, Mustard, Broccoli, and Plum.
    Thanks for explaining the blue and red shifts in a way that makes it easier to digest! It earned my subscription.

  • @schmerol
    @schmerol Рік тому +7

    3:47 didn't know there where swiss particles tho

  • @stevesloan6775
    @stevesloan6775 Рік тому

    Beautifully put together!
    Great work!

  • @loopylunkers8759
    @loopylunkers8759 Рік тому +10

    1:40 netflix

  • @LarryGarfieldCrell
    @LarryGarfieldCrell Рік тому +2

    The way his shirt color keeps changing is freaking me out.

  • @AbiJaay
    @AbiJaay Рік тому +6

    I could never work out how they know things where moving away from us. I know things where red shifted but I wasn’t sure how. This video just answered questions I didn’t even realise I had.

    • @cherrydragon3120
      @cherrydragon3120 Рік тому

      There are tons of video's about red and blue shift. You can even see it in those picture or video's where they show cars on highways sped up.

  • @Itsmidnight_youneedtosleep
    @Itsmidnight_youneedtosleep Рік тому +1

    this is so cool. I especially love the connection to astronomy because thats what im learning about in science right now.

  • @AdamWest-qp3yp
    @AdamWest-qp3yp Рік тому +4

    11:03 let’s give a big shout out to skittles.

  • @josiahpinner6377
    @josiahpinner6377 Рік тому +2

    THANK YOU for this video! I've been very confused about how exoplanets and their makeup have been reported, and you broke it down perfectly!

  • @julesbower762
    @julesbower762 Рік тому +6

    8:50
    A 'kind' of doppler effect?
    That 'is' the doppler effect.
    Doesn't matter what kind of waves, light, water, it is still that effect.

  • @DuyNguyen-ks8dc
    @DuyNguyen-ks8dc Рік тому

    absolutely love your vids. Tks to you, science is so interesting and easy to understand!

  • @johnschlosser8472
    @johnschlosser8472 Рік тому +11

    3:00 - This would be good place to tell a sodium joke... but... Na...

  • @Cosmic_Ray_
    @Cosmic_Ray_ Рік тому

    Great video. It filled in some gaps of information that I didn't know about/didn't completely understand. I'll be sure to share this video with other people.

  • @BonaparteStyle
    @BonaparteStyle Рік тому +5

    Great visualizations! Had to watch it like 3 times too completely get it ;)

    • @BonaparteStyle
      @BonaparteStyle Рік тому +1

      10:00 is an example of something I will share with people. Thanks!

    • @erezyaacoby4484
      @erezyaacoby4484 Рік тому +1

      Lol yeah I'm on my second watch @@BonaparteStyle

    • @blobbie
      @blobbie Рік тому +4

      It came out 3 mins ago. What speed u watching at?😂

    • @helpmycatiseatingme84
      @helpmycatiseatingme84 Рік тому +5

      Love it when people are able to time travel to watch videos over and over again so you can comment 2 minutes after the video releases

    • @BonaparteStyle
      @BonaparteStyle Рік тому +4

      @@helpmycatiseatingme84 I'm a photon. What is time?

  • @jormagi
    @jormagi Рік тому

    Really good video! Best simple explanation I have seen on this subject.

  • @ImGonnaBeAStarr11
    @ImGonnaBeAStarr11 Рік тому +5

    0:32 can someone scan the barcode I want to know what it does

  • @Picla_Peremohy
    @Picla_Peremohy Рік тому

    Tremendous video. Takes me back over 4 decades and reminds me how much I loved this in college.

  • @larshowen3319
    @larshowen3319 Рік тому +5

    I made a lame effort at explaining this phenomenon to some friends of mine, some 15 or 20 years ago. I failed miserably! All I got was blank stares.
    Hats off to you for making it understandable, and frankly, satisfying.
    If you have curiosity about the physics around us, these types of explanations make it so much more enjoyable!

  • @ghomeyshi7
    @ghomeyshi7 7 місяців тому

    Dude! you answered 2 questions of mine in this video! really appreciate it

  • @SuperHansburger93
    @SuperHansburger93 Рік тому +5

    I had always wondered how astrophysicists could learn so much about the composition and movements of astral objects just by looking at them.
    Thanks for explaining it to us! :)

  • @andrewhazlewood4569
    @andrewhazlewood4569 7 місяців тому

    Subscribed. This is your first video that has come up on my feed. Interesting and well presented.Keep it up.

  • @glumpfi
    @glumpfi Рік тому +4

    Would it be possible to create a kind of camera that scans the entire surrounding and for each spot in the picture it splits up a spectrogram, so a photo of elements could be computed? For example: If it's focused on a tiny spot on a car, this spot gets split up in the shown diffraction grating and the pattern is stored along with positional information, so a complete image can be created. (Sorry, hard to explain)

    • @andrewsuryali8540
      @andrewsuryali8540 Рік тому

      This sort of sounds like what multispectral imaging cameras already do.

    • @mpumelelokhumalo7107
      @mpumelelokhumalo7107 Рік тому

      Are you talking about something like the JWST?

    • @kumasenlac5504
      @kumasenlac5504 Рік тому

      @@mpumelelokhumalo7107 Absolutely ! The Webb telescope has both imagers and spectrometers to do just this science - imaging distant objects and picking apart their chemistry. The MIRI instrument looks at wavelengths which are blocked by the Earth's atmosphere - so everything it sees is new to science...

    • @glumpfi
      @glumpfi Рік тому

      @@mpumelelokhumalo7107 I don't know any devices that can do it so... No idea if it is the same :D

  • @friedchicken1
    @friedchicken1 Рік тому +2

    HEY. I paid for the whole rainbow, I'm gonna use the whole rainbow

  • @vrhsr
    @vrhsr Рік тому +8

    1:49 Power Rangers

  • @-SUM1-
    @-SUM1- Рік тому

    This is the video that has single-handedly taught me the most about something I used to wonder about in childhood in perhaps my last decade of UA-cam watching.

  • @bobsmock8226
    @bobsmock8226 Рік тому +4

    That's deuterium, not hydrogen(4:26)

    • @DrDeuteron
      @DrDeuteron Рік тому

      You gotta problem with that?

    • @FenrizNNN
      @FenrizNNN Рік тому

      Deuterium is still considered hydrogen, it just so happens to have its own name.

    • @DrDeuteron
      @DrDeuteron Рік тому

      @@FenrizNNN and don’t forget it

    • @FenrizNNN
      @FenrizNNN Рік тому +1

      @@DrDeuteron But still, it's like calling carbon 13 not carbon because it's not the most common type of carbon.

  • @Daniel.Belas1
    @Daniel.Belas1 Рік тому +1

    Thats actually super cool!!

  • @mrosskne
    @mrosskne Рік тому +5

    3:29 skill issue

  • @AaronAnsari
    @AaronAnsari Рік тому +1

    The changing colour of his shirt to match the missing colours of the spectrum was a nice touch.

  • @user-pr6ed3ri2k
    @user-pr6ed3ri2k Рік тому +3

    2:46 o guess sodium doesnt exist in starr

  • @RealChrisPoole
    @RealChrisPoole Рік тому +1

    dang good conclusion, very good build up

  • @allywithextral7960
    @allywithextral7960 Рік тому +3

    0:29 they scanned the frickin barcode dinney?

  • @brianbecher5781
    @brianbecher5781 Рік тому

    Phenomenal video/explanation!

  • @ronald3836
    @ronald3836 Рік тому +1

    Joseph Fraunhofer was almost killed at the age of 14 when the workshop he was working in collapsed. A Bavarian prince led the rescue operation that saved him and became Fraunhofer's benefactor, which allowed Fraunhofer to study and make his discoveries.