I probably have far too many lenses, for too many systems. I managed to buy my dream lens a couple of years ago, which was the Zeiss 135mm f/2 APO Sonnar, which is an astounding lens optically. Being a manual lens, it can be used on a D850, but it really comes into its own on a mirrorless camera. I used it with a Panasonic S1R, which I bought to use with manual lenses, and that is an amazing combination. I also used it with my GFX100s, and for headshots it is great. The GF110mm f/2, is another amazing lens. I own the Nikkor 105mm f/1.4e, and that is a great lens, but the GF110mm is on another level. It is sharp, renders amazingly, and it has autofocus, which makes it a practical to use. If I had to use one portrait lens, it would be this lens. When it comes to a fun lens. I love my Voigtlander 58mm f/1.4 Nokton. I am not a 50mm guy, but I love 58mm. That extra 8mm, just completely changes everything for me. As a studio lens, it is great stopped down a little and I have used it for a lot of portraiture, going from medium close to full length. It is also a lens I love on my Fujifilm X-E1 for shooting candid portraits. It has a lot of chromatic aberration at f/1.4, but shooting in black and white you get some wonderful images. I shot one of my favourite projects with the lens, and it still makes me smile. The Panasonic 70-200mm f/4, is a lens I bought probably for the wrong reasons. Having bought the Panasonic S1R, I didn't have any autofocus lenses, and I wanted to see what the autofocus was like with the S1R. I also wanted a lighter 70-200mm. I did a 1 to 1(To iron out some bad habits I had picked up doing my master’s degree) with Paul Wilkinson, and he used a Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8s for the entire shoot, and the image he was getting were great, and it was so much more practical than me with my prime lenses. So having seen how Paul was working with his lens. I thought I would get a 70-200mm. The big thing is I didn't want a heavy f/2.8, as I get severe back pain, when I use my Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8 VR2. So, the Panasonic seemed very practical, and I have to say it is a great lens. In studio, I generally shoot at f/8 or higher, which is ideal for the lens, and whilst the lens is built like a tank, it weighs less than 1kg. Sadly, the AF on the Panasonic is not the best, but the lens is exceptional. The last lens I will mention is the Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6e. I bought the lens because a friend said I should try nature photography, and the lens was relatively cheap second hand. I didn't understand the lens at first, as I am not a great nature photographer, but recently, I went and shot deer with the lens, and I was amazed by how wonderful the images came out. Also, I was questioning, why not just buy a 500mm f/4, but during the shoot, I had a deer just come running out of the wood, and it was 4 metres from me, and initially I went to shoot the deer at 500mm, but I just couldn't get the shot I wanted, and sadly, too late, I realised that I needed to zoom back to around 300mm (My brain was thinking, take shots, whilst also tell me that I needed to back off, so I did both). Well, I am sorry for rambling a little, but I hope this was in some way interesting. 😃
I have the Z8 and the 14-24mm was the first lens I got! It's great! My other lens is the 135mm 1.8 Plena which is probably my favorite of all time. But I love both the lenses.
I've kept my favorites from the G-generation, and they work great with adapter. I totally agree on the 105/1.4, my all time favorite, and the 20/1.8S. Then there is of course the legendary big and heavy 200/2 with a fantastic rendering. For birding I have the supersharp 500/5.6 PF, which I've been using a LOT, to my surprise. The fully manual TT Artisan 50/1.4 is a surprisingly great bargain, with approx the same function for me as your magical Voigt, without further comparison :) Lastly, the 28/1.4E is still a magnificent lens.
Awesome vid Hudson - you got a subscribe. I shoot different subjects to you, so obviously my list is a bit different. I shoot paid gigs/events/portraits and street - so my only subjects are people and mostly up close. I shoot with two Z6ii's, and though the Z lenses are mostly nice and sharp and good edge to edge, I do find them (coming from Fuji), a bit ergonomically lacking, especially the S series primes. I have the 24S 35S and the 50S primes. They are about as ergonomic as the cardboard tube out of a toilet roll. However, their zooms are gorgeous. I shoot most of my gigs with the Z24-70 2.s. This is made in Japan, so the feel, handling, ergonomics and optics are truly amazing. This lens is as sharp or sharper than all of my primes. My second gem is the AFS 28mm 1.4E lens. This is a phenomenal lens. and the rendering, focal length, and contrast are on another level. Only downside of course is I have to use the ZTF adapter on my Z camera, which makes an already big lens or bit bigger and heavier. To me it's always about the lenses, not the cameras. I'm happy to shoot with two older Z cameras (which are still fantastic), but put all my extra coin into having the best lenses.
I picked up the 105 f1.4 in Excellent condition on MPB for $829. No idea why it was that low, but it was a match made in heaven and I grabbed it. Keep an eye out and you’ll find one.
One of my all time favorites for nostalgic reason is the Nikor 85mm f/1.8 I bought with in 1971 along with black Nikon Ftn body to do photojournalism for $ can academic credit in college which I still have. I bought it rather than the “normal” 50mm lens because a photojournalism textbook I bought on my own suggested using a ‘cinematic’ story telling sequence of wide establishing shots, medium crops showing ‘the actors’ in the context of the environment and close-ups of hand, facial reactions, etc. I already had a 35mm f/2.5 on my first camera which was a Nikonos II under camera I purchased in 1969 to document my SCUBA diving adventures, which was my second favorite old lens because it was tack sharp and totally manual with knobs on the side for focus and aperture which forced me to be more deliberate when selecting focus point based on hyperfocal distances for any given aperture. It was a camera I could take anywhere in any weather and while doing things like water-waters kayaking. I recently posted a retrospective of my early photos taken with those two cameras and lenses on my channel if you care to take a look. 😊
Totally concur with this list. I also love my AF-S Nikkor 105mm f/1.4E ED, and just added the Voigtländer Z 50mm f/1.0 Nokton (what a beast) to my kit for use on my Zf. And, yes, the Summilux on the Q series is beautiful, too (makes me curious to try the 43mm Summicron on the new Q3 43). I'll add to this list of favorites the Nikkor Z 50mm f/1.8 S lens, Nikkor Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S...and my beloved AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II.
@@dicekolev5360you sound like someone who went to the store attached one to your camera during some shit light hours and left with a flat light experience.
It used to be the 105 DC, until I got the Plena and 85 1.2 which I prefer on every way. They’re the only lenses I have - I used to have ‘one for every occasion’ and ended up leaving them all at home or being dissatisfied that I had the ‘wrong’ lens with me. I now go out with the camera and one lens - and it’s always the right one. For me, a change in mindset really helped. As others have said, a 105 Plena would be cool, but I’d really like an autofocus Noct as I can’t be doing with manual focus lenses any more, however wonderful the results.
As an amateur photographer I love the 100-400 Z lens. Versatility for both landscapes and wildlife is pretty amazing, close focus is really good. The only thing I would change on it would be to make it an internal zoom. 24-120 too is really nice as well. Someday I will get the 14-24. To me this is the “new Trinity.”
I am sold on the Z 2.8 zooms. I prefer to use the Z 70-200 at 85mm, 105mm, 135mm, etc rather than carrying a bag full of primes. When I had those primes I left them at home, or I missed the shot due to the constant lens swapping. It’s just the way I shoot. The quality of the 70-200 is stunning at 2.8. I have never wished I had used a prime. But many times shooting primes I wished I could just alter the focal length. I can concentrate on shooting rather than moving my feet and changing glass. I have the Z 100-400 and Z 800mm which I love for the longer reach… where 2.8 is not needed. The Z 14-24 covers the range of several wide primes and again with superb quality without having to carry/swap lenses. The small Z 24-70 covers the range of mid primes. It is ready to go at all times when running out the door to family events or gatherings. I love the quality of these zooms, and the versatility suits my needs. I know some people prefer to carry bags of primes but I could never manage to select the right ones in advance and didn’t like carrying them all not knowing what I would need when I got there. I am now spending more time shooting and less time trying to plan when to swap lenses and which ones to change to. Much less stress when on site.
@@m.maclean8911 I once felt the same. I've evolved to adore my primes much more than I ever did my 2.8 zooms. Most frequently I'm carrying the Q3 and the 24-120 or 100-400. When the light drops there's nothing like the 50 1.0 on the ZF. It's a whole other thing. For wildlife and sports nothing beats the 400 TC.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto kind of neat how we can evolve in totally opposite directions … that’s the beauty and depth of the world of photography. I wish I could afford the 400 TC… 🙄
Yes, I was a fan of a 70-200 2.8. But If you take the 135 1.8 instead: - by far less bulk - better subject separation, better low light capabilities - if needed do a crop in post No, I do not carry a bag full of primes, just one on the camera. The difference is you are free to focus your activities to all aspects of perspective, depth of field, exposure, ... by getting rid of this zoom ring making photography a lazy activity. Yes, there are some scenarios a 70-200 is the best choice, but I barely ever come to these scenarios. And most are better to be covered with a 100-300 2.8.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto. I’m wondering if the V50 1.0. Can be used as effectively on the Z8 or Z9. I know ZF. Has the special manual focus feature that is not in the Z9 or Z9 does that mean it is too difficult to use that lens without that feature can you clarify? Thanks (do you think Nikon will add that in a firmware upgrade or we have to wait for the next camera)
Great list. You had convinced me to get the 50 f1 for my zf. Convinced someone on ebsy to sell it to me for 1200usd. Amazing lens combined with new neewer thimbgrip grip. I love my zeiss 100 f2 makro for fmount but may need to look at the 105 too. I have the 20mm 1.8 g but sadly never use it that much as I err to the side of telephoto. Maybe I should give it a go! It is also amazing at close focusing wide angle macroesque shots. Got a 500 f4 fl this year but that 400 tc is a god tier lens. Never let it go. I might sell one of my kids for it if they misbehave haha
Thinking the plena is a leading indicator of Nikon's progress in long-normal/short zoom lens design + more fully exploring the geometry of the z-mount. It is a complete blast to use, and what great results. Just reviewed some images and couldn't help but grinning ... hope there is a z 105 next in that line, and perhaps a v2 of the 85 1.2. Thx for the video, fun topic to consider.
I so regret (not every day but kind of) to have sold my 105 1.4 when switching from D5 to Z9... it was the most special ever, by very very far (especially indoor where it was just unreal), as you have noticed yourself Hudson !
Interesting list! The lens I’ll never part with is my Tamron 35mm F1.4 for Nikon F mount. On either my D850 or Z7ii, it’s superb in low light for events. I suspect adapted to ZF might feel unbalanced. But I also love my old NIKKOR-O 35mm F2 (factory converted to ai that allows use on D850) - especially sweet for monochrome street photography. On the long end, the Nikon 300mm F4 PF is great for events (public speakers; musicians on stage; orchestra). And also the Nikon 180mm F2.8 ED. But you have me thinking more about that 105mm F1.4 (I have the old F2.5 also pre-ai converted to ai). I agree with you that focal length has a sweet spot between 85mm and 135mm. Honorable mention: we recently picked up the 24-85mm F3.5-4.5 VR. That lens is versatile, crisp, and lightweight and used going for way under $300. My wife used it recently at a college reunion event we did and it never left her Z6ii.
Great review! Have most and also love them all (EXCEPT the 400, I wish...). Agree 100% I do enjoy my 85mm f1.2 S though. Zf with 50mm f/1.0 is as you say, special. And really enjoying my new Q3 28. Safe travels.
Excellent video, new sub. My favorite at the moment is 24-70 f2.8 F mount. It's a bit heavy on the Zf, but certainly well worth the effort. Excellent photos with each lens. Greatly enjoyed them.
I do hope Nikon is watching and consider creating a new Z 105 f1.4 Plena. Their F mount 105 f1.4 will go down as one of the best Nikon has ever created. For me, 105 focal range is just right. It just looks better when framing. Yes, the Z 135 Plena is great but no everybody works with the focal lenght compared to the 85 and 105
Thanks Hudson! This was an incredible overview of some outstanding lenses! I don't have a "Holy Trinity" of f/2.8 zooms, but I do have a "Hoag's Trinity" of zooms that I found works well for me: 14-30mm f/4 S 24-120mm f/4 S and 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 S These lenses give me coverage from 14mm to 400mm with just 3 S Line lenses and made the transition to Nikon a viable option. None of these lenses made your list, but for me, they work well. One lens from your list that I do plan on getting for exactly the reason that you love it is the 20mm f/1.8 S. I am looking forward to shooting the milky way with it. The one Sony lens that I really miss was my 14mm f/1.8 G Master. That was an amazing night time lens.
@@cspencer9141 everybody will have their own unique needs, but these work well for me. I made the switch from Sony to Nikon (Z8) after I attended one of Hudson's workshops. I learned more in 5 days than I had in the previous 20 years.
I have the Nikon Z7 ll I love this camera. I use it with the Z mount lenses 20 mm 1.835 mm 1.850 mm 1.8 and 85 mm 1.8. They are all outstanding lenses. I think my favorite is the 20 mm one8 second would be the 85 mm 18 but they are all standing lenses. I shoot landscape and close up like flowers and I don’t think I’d trade the lenses for anything
“Awesome group of people, and Rick LePage”. LMAO - slip of the tongue there. I happen to think Rick is Awesome, as I know you do. Another great ATS! Your perspective is always appreciated- “it comes with a camera” I can’t stop laughing. I do miss hanging out with you.
Have to agree on the 400 TC and the 105/1.4. I also kept my 200/2 which I have been taking on safari the last few years out of curiosity. It's earned it's keep... What did you think of Scotland, especially Mull?
I know you have commented previously on the 105/2.8 MC being one of the best macro lenses out there. I would love to see a side by side comparison and maybe a conversation on that Lens versus the 105/1.4
Great video and useful information. I drooled over the 105 for years and finally picked one up three years ago. I don't think I will be getting the z400mm f2.8 Z S lens but what do you think about the f mount 400mm f2.8 lens and the z1.4 converter? I still use my D850 and D500 but the wife got me a Z9 two years ago and I have been adding lens as I can.
The thing that won me over to the 2.8 TC was the hand holdability. The F-mount is a tripod only affair. The 600TC is only handholdable for limited periods. I litterally almost never mount the 400TC to a monopod or tripod. It's wieghted so well and just the right balance. It changes everything to handhold it. I'd argue for the 4.5 Z over the F mount 2.8. It's a great lens, but a huge beast that comes with a steamer trunk.
Great topic with reasons "why". May I ask what filters (Kase sizes for the 62mm) you use/recommend for the Voigtlander Nokton 50mm f/1.0 Aspherical? Thank you for your experienced recommendations.
I picked up the Plena and it has really upped my game in the causal portrait space - and it's not really my game. I do have the Sigma 105mm f/1.4 ART lens and I really like it - but she is heavy. A bit more specialized than the Plena. But I agree, a 105mm Plena would be a welcome addition (or replacement......).
Amazing lenses and as always great content. You mentioned the Kase 112mm filter system you use on the Nikon 14-24mm. Would you be able to share your setup for these large filters, please? Thanks. I am loving my 180-600 joy to use.
I think my most favorite focal length from 45 years of photography is 35mm and 85mm, I also use 21 and 24 a lot and macro Lenses. My Lenses now are 14, 21, 24, two 35, 55, 65 macro, two 85, 110 macro, 135 and 500mm, but last week I bought a focal lengt that I do not like (I do not like 28 and 50mm), but it is so very special for low light photography, the Voigtländer Nokton 50mm 1.0 Aspherical, so I just have to admit that a focal length I do not like can be useful if it is the right one, so far it is a succes, it is magic to use aperture 1.0 at low light witout the need to push the ISO and you do get unique images. I only use prime Lenses, I do not like zoom lenses.
Agree with your choices however for me the lens that is special for the work I do is the 58mm f/1.4 G F mount lens. It’s similar to 105mm f1.4 character and razor sharp as well. I would never part with either 105mm f/1.4 or 58mm f/1.4.
Hello Hudson. You said that you mainly take B&W photos with the Voigtlander 50mm f/1. However, when taking color photos, the LOCA purple and green fringing will become more evident. How big of an issue is that?
I'm exceedingly happy with my F14-24 F2.8 mounted to Z6iii (via FTZII). (Setup new for me... came from D7500 and love the Tokina 11-16 F2.8 on it). Mostly Astro, and in the right circumstance landscapes. No Tracker yet. Would I really see a difference moving to the Z14-24 F2.8. And what about F1.8 20mm? You leave me very torn!!!
@@judgesteve6798 you certainly would. You'd be blown away by both. BLOWN AWAY! To be honest the 14-30 S f4 outperforms the old AFS 14-24 2.8, and I say that as someone who carried the AFS religiousltly for about 12 years.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Thanks.... Guess its time to start saving up again. I've had people say I should sell some of my images (they say that but they haven't seen what prices would have to be)... Selling not my goal but maybe if it supports my lens habit. Thank You! Always Enjoy your videos Hudson!
Have 4 of your Nikon/Voigtlander lenses, except the Nikon Z 400mm f/2.8 TC S lens, which is missing in the set. Not because of the price, but of the magnetic field it produces when focussing. It would interact with my pacemaker!!!
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Instead of the Z 400mm f/2.8 TC S lens I acquired a manual focus Nikon AI Nikkor 400mm f/3.5 ED IF lens. It was designed for the Olympics of Grenoble and Mexico City (See Nikon Tales- The Thousand and One Nights No.66) and is the big daddy of al next generation 400 f/2.8 lenses. Together with my Nikon Z9 I photograph Soccer with it.
@@JayJayYUP yep that's a big, interesting lens. I vastly prefer the Voigtländer 50 1.0's character, size, style, unobtrusivenes and ergonomics, but the 58 Noct is a very precise beast of a lens, and collectible for sure. I've enjoyed shooting it.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto I wish the Nocton did what it does (maintain sharpness wide open, but goes in the complete opposite direction). Then again, if it did, the 58mm would be rendered irrelevant at that point I imagine.
@@jamesjackson4264 I own the 1.0 Voigtländer and have shot the 58 Noct extensively at night and during daylight. I have several good friends that own it. I'll take the 50 1.0 every time personally. The 58 .95 is a joy to look at and a sure collectors item, but of limited real world practicality for me.
I HAVE THE THINK TANK RETROSPECTIVE 4 IN PINESTONE COLOR. WENT ON 3 WEEK TRIP WITH Z6II, 26MM AND 24-120MM LENSES. HOLDS EXTRA BATTERY, CARDS, SUNGLASSES AND IPAD. EASY AND SMALL KIT TO CARRY.
@@DSG0805 the last Fstop peice I carry. The Navin holster, but more often I just sling it bare on my Luma QD strap. I know you can't get those now, but I'm working on a replacement. ;)
I am racking my brain here. I don’t shoot video and I feel I just bought the z6iii wasting my money and should have kept my Zf. I have the 180-600, 24-120, and the 105. It was the ergonomics that I could get used to. But I do shoot wildlife, I shoot landscape, and I do shoot macro. I don’t have the money for the Z8, so I’m your honest opinion, should I trade my z6iii back to the Zf? Or just keep the Z6iii and get used to it? I’m no professional, but I do love to print and I do love to post my pictures. Help me make up my mind.
I am curious, would you prefer a Z mount 16-34mm f2.8 S lens over the 14-24mm f2.8, assuming that it was at least as good optically? I know Nikon got a certificate of patent for such a lens on February 14, 2023. A quality 16-34mm f2.8 S lens could well become one of my favorite lenses of all time because I am much more interested in the additional reach to 34mm than having the ability to shoot in the 14-15mm range. It would mean fewer lens changes in the field and a simplified filter collection. Canon and Sony both have similar lenses, Sony is even on its second generation of the lens. PLEASE NIKON!
@@mmv8416 nope, not at all. We all have different tastes which makes the world more interesting. I never could stand the old 16-35. Tried it and couldn't give it back fast enough 🤣 if they could give me a 12-20 F4 the size and weight of the 14-24 with similar rendering... I'd want to have that. But I adore the 14-24 S and I live at 14mm with it or shooting panos at 14mm with it. If it's over 20mm, I'd rather have the Q3 or the 24-120's versatility. I have ZERO interest in a 16-anything. A 12-something...? Sign me up!
@@tectorama I once felt the same. I've evolved to adore my primes much more than I ever did my 2.8 zooms. Most frequently I'm carrying the Q3 and the 24-120 or 100-400. When the light drops there's nothing like the 50 1.0 on the ZF. It's a whole other thing. For wildlife and sports nothing beats the 400 TC.
I probably have far too many lenses, for too many systems. I managed to buy my dream lens a couple of years ago, which was the Zeiss 135mm f/2 APO Sonnar, which is an astounding lens optically. Being a manual lens, it can be used on a D850, but it really comes into its own on a mirrorless camera. I used it with a Panasonic S1R, which I bought to use with manual lenses, and that is an amazing combination. I also used it with my GFX100s, and for headshots it is great.
The GF110mm f/2, is another amazing lens. I own the Nikkor 105mm f/1.4e, and that is a great lens, but the GF110mm is on another level. It is sharp, renders amazingly, and it has autofocus, which makes it a practical to use. If I had to use one portrait lens, it would be this lens.
When it comes to a fun lens. I love my Voigtlander 58mm f/1.4 Nokton. I am not a 50mm guy, but I love 58mm. That extra 8mm, just completely changes everything for me. As a studio lens, it is great stopped down a little and I have used it for a lot of portraiture, going from medium close to full length. It is also a lens I love on my Fujifilm X-E1 for shooting candid portraits. It has a lot of chromatic aberration at f/1.4, but shooting in black and white you get some wonderful images. I shot one of my favourite projects with the lens, and it still makes me smile.
The Panasonic 70-200mm f/4, is a lens I bought probably for the wrong reasons. Having bought the Panasonic S1R, I didn't have any autofocus lenses, and I wanted to see what the autofocus was like with the S1R. I also wanted a lighter 70-200mm. I did a 1 to 1(To iron out some bad habits I had picked up doing my master’s degree) with Paul Wilkinson, and he used a Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8s for the entire shoot, and the image he was getting were great, and it was so much more practical than me with my prime lenses.
So having seen how Paul was working with his lens. I thought I would get a 70-200mm. The big thing is I didn't want a heavy f/2.8, as I get severe back pain, when I use my Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8 VR2. So, the Panasonic seemed very practical, and I have to say it is a great lens. In studio, I generally shoot at f/8 or higher, which is ideal for the lens, and whilst the lens is built like a tank, it weighs less than 1kg. Sadly, the AF on the Panasonic is not the best, but the lens is exceptional.
The last lens I will mention is the Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6e. I bought the lens because a friend said I should try nature photography, and the lens was relatively cheap second hand. I didn't understand the lens at first, as I am not a great nature photographer, but recently, I went and shot deer with the lens, and I was amazed by how wonderful the images came out. Also, I was questioning, why not just buy a 500mm f/4, but during the shoot, I had a deer just come running out of the wood, and it was 4 metres from me, and initially I went to shoot the deer at 500mm, but I just couldn't get the shot I wanted, and sadly, too late, I realised that I needed to zoom back to around 300mm (My brain was thinking, take shots, whilst also tell me that I needed to back off, so I did both).
Well, I am sorry for rambling a little, but I hope this was in some way interesting. 😃
I have the Z8 and the 14-24mm was the first lens I got! It's great! My other lens is the 135mm 1.8 Plena which is probably my favorite of all time. But I love both the lenses.
I've kept my favorites from the G-generation, and they work great with adapter. I totally agree on the 105/1.4, my all time favorite, and the 20/1.8S. Then there is of course the legendary big and heavy 200/2 with a fantastic rendering. For birding I have the supersharp 500/5.6 PF, which I've been using a LOT, to my surprise. The fully manual TT Artisan 50/1.4 is a surprisingly great bargain, with approx the same function for me as your magical Voigt, without further comparison :) Lastly, the 28/1.4E is still a magnificent lens.
Awesome vid Hudson - you got a subscribe. I shoot different subjects to you, so obviously my list is a bit different. I shoot paid gigs/events/portraits and street - so my only subjects are people and mostly up close. I shoot with two Z6ii's, and though the Z lenses are mostly nice and sharp and good edge to edge, I do find them (coming from Fuji), a bit ergonomically lacking, especially the S series primes. I have the 24S 35S and the 50S primes. They are about as ergonomic as the cardboard tube out of a toilet roll. However, their zooms are gorgeous. I shoot most of my gigs with the Z24-70 2.s. This is made in Japan, so the feel, handling, ergonomics and optics are truly amazing. This lens is as sharp or sharper than all of my primes. My second gem is the AFS 28mm 1.4E lens. This is a phenomenal lens. and the rendering, focal length, and contrast are on another level. Only downside of course is I have to use the ZTF adapter on my Z camera, which makes an already big lens or bit bigger and heavier. To me it's always about the lenses, not the cameras. I'm happy to shoot with two older Z cameras (which are still fantastic), but put all my extra coin into having the best lenses.
I picked up the 105 f1.4 in Excellent condition on MPB for $829. No idea why it was that low, but it was a match made in heaven and I grabbed it.
Keep an eye out and you’ll find one.
Which eye? Left or right?
One of my all time favorites for nostalgic reason is the Nikor 85mm f/1.8 I bought with in 1971 along with black Nikon Ftn body to do photojournalism for $ can academic credit in college which I still have. I bought it rather than the “normal” 50mm lens because a photojournalism textbook I bought on my own suggested using a ‘cinematic’ story telling sequence of wide establishing shots, medium crops showing ‘the actors’ in the context of the environment and close-ups of hand, facial reactions, etc. I already had a 35mm f/2.5 on my first camera which was a Nikonos II under camera I purchased in 1969 to document my SCUBA diving adventures, which was my second favorite old lens because it was tack sharp and totally manual with knobs on the side for focus and aperture which forced me to be more deliberate when selecting focus point based on hyperfocal distances for any given aperture. It was a camera I could take anywhere in any weather and while doing things like water-waters kayaking. I recently posted a retrospective of my early photos taken with those two cameras and lenses on my channel if you care to take a look. 😊
Great selection 👌
Oh no. Now I have to buy the Voightlander 50mm f1! Thanks Hudson. Great video
Totally concur with this list. I also love my AF-S Nikkor 105mm f/1.4E ED, and just added the Voigtländer Z 50mm f/1.0 Nokton (what a beast) to my kit for use on my Zf. And, yes, the Summilux on the Q series is beautiful, too (makes me curious to try the 43mm Summicron on the new Q3 43). I'll add to this list of favorites the Nikkor Z 50mm f/1.8 S lens, Nikkor Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S...and my beloved AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II.
For me my special lens is: the z135mm plena ,
the low contrast no 3d pop one?:P
@@dicekolev5360you sound like someone who went to the store attached one to your camera during some shit light hours and left with a flat light experience.
@@MrPawnyouyou too
@@MrPawnyousounds like you’ve never used one.
It used to be the 105 DC, until I got the Plena and 85 1.2 which I prefer on every way. They’re the only lenses I have - I used to have ‘one for every occasion’ and ended up leaving them all at home or being dissatisfied that I had the ‘wrong’ lens with me. I now go out with the camera and one lens - and it’s always the right one. For me, a change in mindset really helped.
As others have said, a 105 Plena would be cool, but I’d really like an autofocus Noct as I can’t be doing with manual focus lenses any more, however wonderful the results.
As an amateur photographer I love the 100-400 Z lens. Versatility for both landscapes and wildlife is pretty amazing, close focus is really good. The only thing I would change on it would be to make it an internal zoom. 24-120 too is really nice as well. Someday I will get the 14-24. To me this is the “new Trinity.”
@@cspencer9141 it really is fir me too. If the 100-400 was internal it would have to be huge like the 180-600. I'm so glad they made it compact.
I am sold on the Z 2.8 zooms.
I prefer to use the Z 70-200 at 85mm, 105mm, 135mm, etc rather than carrying a bag full of primes. When I had those primes I left them at home, or I missed the shot due to the constant lens swapping. It’s just the way I shoot. The quality of the 70-200 is stunning at 2.8. I have never wished I had used a prime. But many times shooting primes I wished I could just alter the focal length. I can concentrate on shooting rather than moving my feet and changing glass.
I have the Z 100-400 and Z 800mm which I love for the longer reach… where 2.8 is not needed.
The Z 14-24 covers the range of several wide primes and again with superb quality without having to carry/swap lenses.
The small Z 24-70 covers the range of mid primes. It is ready to go at all times when running out the door to family events or gatherings.
I love the quality of these zooms, and the versatility suits my needs. I know some people prefer to carry bags of primes but I could never manage to select the right ones in advance and didn’t like carrying them all not knowing what I would need when I got there. I am now spending more time shooting and less time trying to plan when to swap lenses and which ones to change to. Much less stress when on site.
@@m.maclean8911 I once felt the same. I've evolved to adore my primes much more than I ever did my 2.8 zooms. Most frequently I'm carrying the Q3 and the 24-120 or 100-400. When the light drops there's nothing like the 50 1.0 on the ZF. It's a whole other thing. For wildlife and sports nothing beats the 400 TC.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto kind of neat how we can evolve in totally opposite directions … that’s the beauty and depth of the world of photography. I wish I could afford the 400 TC… 🙄
Yes, I was a fan of a 70-200 2.8. But If you take the 135 1.8 instead:
- by far less bulk
- better subject separation, better low light capabilities
- if needed do a crop in post
No, I do not carry a bag full of primes, just one on the camera.
The difference is you are free to focus your activities to all aspects of perspective, depth of field, exposure, ... by getting rid of this zoom ring making photography a lazy activity.
Yes, there are some scenarios a 70-200 is the best choice, but I barely ever come to these scenarios. And most are better to be covered with a 100-300 2.8.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto. I’m wondering if the V50 1.0. Can be used as effectively on the Z8 or Z9. I know ZF. Has the special manual focus feature that is not in the Z9 or Z9 does that mean it is too difficult to use that lens without that feature can you clarify? Thanks (do you think Nikon will add that in a firmware upgrade or we have to wait for the next camera)
Great list. You had convinced me to get the 50 f1 for my zf. Convinced someone on ebsy to sell it to me for 1200usd. Amazing lens combined with new neewer thimbgrip grip.
I love my zeiss 100 f2 makro for fmount but may need to look at the 105 too.
I have the 20mm 1.8 g but sadly never use it that much as I err to the side of telephoto. Maybe I should give it a go! It is also amazing at close focusing wide angle macroesque shots.
Got a 500 f4 fl this year but that 400 tc is a god tier lens. Never let it go. I might sell one of my kids for it if they misbehave haha
Thinking the plena is a leading indicator of Nikon's progress in long-normal/short zoom lens design + more fully exploring the geometry of the z-mount. It is a complete blast to use, and what great results. Just reviewed some images and couldn't help but grinning ... hope there is a z 105 next in that line, and perhaps a v2 of the 85 1.2. Thx for the video, fun topic to consider.
A true polymorph: enlistee, law school, photographer. Very interesting. 👍👍👍
I so regret (not every day but kind of) to have sold my 105 1.4 when switching from D5 to Z9... it was the most special ever, by very very far (especially indoor where it was just unreal), as you have noticed yourself Hudson !
I shoot everything with it, wildlife at night, portraits, landscape, macro and it will be with me til in 105 y o. Fantastic glass.
Waiting on my MSM to give the 20 1.8 a run. Had fun wide open with the latest aurora coming southward. Thanks for the chat!
The Voigtländer 50mm 1.0 is great, I like it.
The Voigtländer 40mm 1.2 is even greater in my eyes, what a special one!
@@peterebel7899 I much prefer the 50 1.0 The 40 didn't do much for me, but differences of opinion make the word more interesting. 😊
Interesting list! The lens I’ll never part with is my Tamron 35mm F1.4 for Nikon F mount. On either my D850 or Z7ii, it’s superb in low light for events. I suspect adapted to ZF might feel unbalanced. But I also love my old NIKKOR-O 35mm F2 (factory converted to ai that allows use on D850) - especially sweet for monochrome street photography. On the long end, the Nikon 300mm F4 PF is great for events (public speakers; musicians on stage; orchestra). And also the Nikon 180mm F2.8 ED. But you have me thinking more about that 105mm F1.4 (I have the old F2.5 also pre-ai converted to ai). I agree with you that focal length has a sweet spot between 85mm and 135mm. Honorable mention: we recently picked up the 24-85mm F3.5-4.5 VR. That lens is versatile, crisp, and lightweight and used going for way under $300. My wife used it recently at a college reunion event we did and it never left her Z6ii.
Great review! Have most and also love them all (EXCEPT the 400, I wish...). Agree 100% I do enjoy my 85mm f1.2 S though. Zf with 50mm f/1.0 is as you say, special. And really enjoying my new Q3 28. Safe travels.
Excellent video, new sub. My favorite at the moment is 24-70 f2.8 F mount. It's a bit heavy on the Zf, but certainly well worth the effort. Excellent photos with each lens. Greatly enjoyed them.
I love my Z 20 1.8. If you have a star tracker the 35 and 50 1.8 also have amazing detail in the Milky Way.
@@Ben_Stewart indeed, but the 20 is special.
I do hope Nikon is watching and consider creating a new Z 105 f1.4 Plena. Their F mount 105 f1.4 will go down as one of the best Nikon has ever created. For me, 105 focal range is just right. It just looks better when framing. Yes, the Z 135 Plena is great but no everybody works with the focal lenght compared to the 85 and 105
Thanks Hudson! This was an incredible overview of some outstanding lenses!
I don't have a "Holy Trinity" of f/2.8 zooms, but I do have a "Hoag's Trinity" of zooms that I found works well for me:
14-30mm f/4 S
24-120mm f/4 S and
100-400 f/4.5-5.6 S These lenses give me coverage from 14mm to 400mm with just 3 S Line lenses and made the transition to Nikon a viable option. None of these lenses made your list, but for me, they work well.
One lens from your list that I do plan on getting for exactly the reason that you love it is the 20mm f/1.8 S. I am looking forward to shooting the milky way with it.
The one Sony lens that I really miss was my 14mm f/1.8 G Master. That was an amazing night time lens.
Hudson uses and really likes both the 24-120 and 100-400….in fact his recommendation has likely sold lots of those…especially the 100-400!!!
They didn’t make this list but he uses them pretty frequently.
I have the same lenses, I call them my f/4 Trinity. Love them all.
@@cspencer9141 everybody will have their own unique needs, but these work well for me. I made the switch from Sony to Nikon (Z8) after I attended one of Hudson's workshops. I learned more in 5 days than I had in the previous 20 years.
I have the Nikon Z7 ll I love this camera. I use it with the Z mount lenses 20 mm 1.835 mm 1.850 mm 1.8 and 85 mm 1.8. They are all outstanding lenses. I think my favorite is the 20 mm one8 second would be the 85 mm 18 but they are all standing lenses. I shoot landscape and close up like flowers and I don’t think I’d trade the lenses for anything
“Awesome group of people, and Rick LePage”. LMAO - slip of the tongue there. I happen to think Rick is Awesome, as I know you do. Another great ATS! Your perspective is always appreciated- “it comes with a camera” I can’t stop laughing. I do miss hanging out with you.
the 50mm 1.0 and the Leica are my faves.
Favourite lens? With a Z8, I still love to shoot the 24mm PC-E tilt shift.
Have to agree on the 400 TC and the 105/1.4. I also kept my 200/2 which I have been taking on safari the last few years out of curiosity. It's earned it's keep... What did you think of Scotland, especially Mull?
I adore Scotland, hence our passion for running workshops there. Mull looks great as do so many locations, but Skye has my heart.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Sorry I was mistaken. I was on Skye a few weeks ago. Did you get to the Three Chimneys restaurant?
I know you have commented previously on the 105/2.8 MC being one of the best macro lenses out there. I would love to see a side by side comparison and maybe a conversation on that Lens versus the 105/1.4
Great video and useful information. I drooled over the 105 for years and finally picked one up three years ago. I don't think I will be getting the z400mm f2.8 Z S lens but what do you think about the f mount 400mm f2.8 lens and the z1.4 converter? I still use my D850 and D500 but the wife got me a Z9 two years ago and I have been adding lens as I can.
The thing that won me over to the 2.8 TC was the hand holdability. The F-mount is a tripod only affair. The 600TC is only handholdable for limited periods. I litterally almost never mount the 400TC to a monopod or tripod. It's wieghted so well and just the right balance. It changes everything to handhold it. I'd argue for the 4.5 Z over the F mount 2.8. It's a great lens, but a huge beast that comes with a steamer trunk.
Great topic with reasons "why". May I ask what filters (Kase sizes for the 62mm) you use/recommend for the Voigtlander Nokton 50mm f/1.0 Aspherical? Thank you for your experienced recommendations.
I picked up the Plena and it has really upped my game in the causal portrait space - and it's not really my game. I do have the Sigma 105mm f/1.4 ART lens and I really like it - but she is heavy. A bit more specialized than the Plena. But I agree, a 105mm Plena would be a welcome addition (or replacement......).
Amazing lenses and as always great content.
You mentioned the Kase 112mm filter system you use on the Nikon 14-24mm.
Would you be able to share your setup for these large filters, please?
Thanks.
I am loving my 180-600 joy to use.
@@gunsentry8349 www.hudsonhenry.com/kase
Excellent video! I am curious of all of your lenses which offers the best sun stars?
@@loonytoongonemad8304 the 24-120 and it is great at f11
I think my most favorite focal length from 45 years of photography is 35mm and 85mm, I also use 21 and 24 a lot and macro Lenses. My Lenses now are 14, 21, 24, two 35, 55, 65 macro, two 85, 110 macro, 135 and 500mm, but last week I bought a focal lengt that I do not like (I do not like 28 and 50mm), but it is so very special for low light photography, the Voigtländer Nokton 50mm 1.0 Aspherical, so I just have to admit that a focal length I do not like can be useful if it is the right one, so far it is a succes, it is magic to use aperture 1.0 at low light witout the need to push the ISO and you do get unique images. I only use prime Lenses, I do not like zoom lenses.
Agree with your choices however for me the lens that is special for the work I do is the 58mm f/1.4 G F mount lens. It’s similar to 105mm f1.4 character and razor sharp as well. I would never part with either 105mm f/1.4 or 58mm f/1.4.
What's the L-Bracket you placed on your ZF? Interesting. Kindly provide me with a link, pls.
I was wondering the same thing! 😊
@@ApoErylle it's stacked over the grip, both are linked with the camera here... Www.hudsonhenry.com/atslinks
Hello Hudson. You said that you mainly take B&W photos with the Voigtlander 50mm f/1. However, when taking color photos, the LOCA purple and green fringing will become more evident. How big of an issue is that?
@@Marvin-o1c simple fix in Lightroom and not an issue stopped down a little.
I'm exceedingly happy with my F14-24 F2.8 mounted to Z6iii (via FTZII). (Setup new for me... came from D7500 and love the Tokina 11-16 F2.8 on it). Mostly Astro, and in the right circumstance landscapes. No Tracker yet. Would I really see a difference moving to the Z14-24 F2.8. And what about F1.8 20mm? You leave me very torn!!!
@@judgesteve6798 you certainly would. You'd be blown away by both. BLOWN AWAY! To be honest the 14-30 S f4 outperforms the old AFS 14-24 2.8, and I say that as someone who carried the AFS religiousltly for about 12 years.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Thanks.... Guess its time to start saving up again. I've had people say I should sell some of my images (they say that but they haven't seen what prices would have to be)... Selling not my goal but maybe if it supports my lens habit. Thank You! Always Enjoy your videos Hudson!
Have 4 of your Nikon/Voigtlander lenses, except the Nikon Z 400mm f/2.8 TC S lens, which is missing in the set. Not because of the price, but of the magnetic field it produces when focussing. It would interact with my pacemaker!!!
@@alberte58 yeah, such a bummer that. 😔 I'm sure they were surprised to find that effect. I hope no one found out the hard way.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Instead of the Z 400mm f/2.8 TC S lens I acquired a manual focus Nikon AI Nikkor 400mm f/3.5 ED IF lens. It was designed for the Olympics of Grenoble and Mexico City (See Nikon Tales- The Thousand and One Nights No.66) and is the big daddy of al next generation 400 f/2.8 lenses. Together with my Nikon Z9 I photograph Soccer with it.
@@alberte58 had one of those for well over a decade. I loved it. 😊
58mm F0.95 Z, tbh, basically the best non-tele prime in existence at the moment.
@@JayJayYUP yep that's a big, interesting lens. I vastly prefer the Voigtländer 50 1.0's character, size, style, unobtrusivenes and ergonomics, but the 58 Noct is a very precise beast of a lens, and collectible for sure. I've enjoyed shooting it.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto I wish the Nocton did what it does (maintain sharpness wide open, but goes in the complete opposite direction). Then again, if it did, the 58mm would be rendered irrelevant at that point I imagine.
Do you own it?
@@jamesjackson4264 I own the 1.0 Voigtländer and have shot the 58 Noct extensively at night and during daylight. I have several good friends that own it. I'll take the 50 1.0 every time personally. The 58 .95 is a joy to look at and a sure collectors item, but of limited real world practicality for me.
@@jamesjackson4264 Nah, not on Nikon anymore, so missing it very much (for the short time I got to use it).
Hello Hudson, is that an universal L-Bracket on your ZF? Been looking for one.
@@desmondh it's stacked over the grip, both are linked with the camera here... Www.hudsonhenry.com/atslinks
How would you compare the Voightlander 50 mm 1.0 with the Nikon Z50 mm 1.2 lens
Oh and you have and recommendations for a small bag for zf and just voigt lens? What do you use if you bring it everywhere?
I HAVE THE THINK TANK RETROSPECTIVE 4 IN PINESTONE COLOR. WENT ON 3 WEEK TRIP WITH Z6II, 26MM AND 24-120MM LENSES. HOLDS EXTRA BATTERY, CARDS, SUNGLASSES AND IPAD. EASY AND SMALL KIT TO CARRY.
@@DSG0805 the last Fstop peice I carry. The Navin holster, but more often I just sling it bare on my Luma QD strap. I know you can't get those now, but I'm working on a replacement. ;)
what about your favorite film cameras?
I am racking my brain here. I don’t shoot video and I feel I just bought the z6iii wasting my money and should have kept my Zf.
I have the 180-600, 24-120, and the 105. It was the ergonomics that I could get used to.
But I do shoot wildlife, I shoot landscape, and I do shoot macro.
I don’t have the money for the Z8, so I’m your honest opinion, should I trade my z6iii back to the Zf? Or just keep the Z6iii and get used to it?
I’m no professional, but I do love to print and I do love to post my pictures.
Help me make up my mind.
@@briancarlisle2534 the 6iii is better for wildlife. No doubt.
I am curious, would you prefer a Z mount 16-34mm f2.8 S lens over the 14-24mm f2.8, assuming that it was at least as good optically? I know Nikon got a certificate of patent for such a lens on February 14, 2023. A quality 16-34mm f2.8 S lens could well become one of my favorite lenses of all time because I am much more interested in the additional reach to 34mm than having the ability to shoot in the 14-15mm range. It would mean fewer lens changes in the field and a simplified filter collection. Canon and Sony both have similar lenses, Sony is even on its second generation of the lens. PLEASE NIKON!
@@mmv8416 nope, not at all. We all have different tastes which makes the world more interesting. I never could stand the old 16-35. Tried it and couldn't give it back fast enough 🤣 if they could give me a 12-20 F4 the size and weight of the 14-24 with similar rendering... I'd want to have that. But I adore the 14-24 S and I live at 14mm with it or shooting panos at 14mm with it. If it's over 20mm, I'd rather have the Q3 or the 24-120's versatility. I have ZERO interest in a 16-anything. A 12-something...? Sign me up!
Hoorah
😊Are theey swiss
If i had to choose 1 lens; Nikkor 50mm f/1.4 Ai
@@kaczynski2333 you'd lose your mind shooting the Voigtländer 1.0 then
@HudsonHenryPhoto damn, she's spendy!
@@kaczynski2333 so special.
I stick with zoom lenses. I have four which cover from 24mm - 600mm. I have no need
for any prime lenses.
@@tectorama I once felt the same. I've evolved to adore my primes much more than I ever did my 2.8 zooms. Most frequently I'm carrying the Q3 and the 24-120 or 100-400. When the light drops there's nothing like the 50 1.0 on the ZF. It's a whole other thing. For wildlife and sports nothing beats the 400 TC.