China's grab for the UN‘s Food and Agriculture Organization | DW Documentary

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лют 2024
  • China has headed the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) since 2019. During this time, the country has restructured the organization’s personnel. Critics complain that China is advancing its own interests, using the UN's largest specialized agency.
    The FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), headquartered in Rome, is responsible for food and agriculture worldwide. It is the UN's largest specialized agency. It collects data on the agricultural sector and develops projects to help people access better nutrition - something that is more important than ever, with climate change and the growing world population.
    Qu Dongyu, from China, has been Director-General of the FAO since 2019. After taking office, he restructured the organization. He appointed Chinese directors to central departments. Before Qu's election, two director positions were occupied by Chinese nationals. Now, that number is six. One of these directors is responsible for crop protection - which includes the handling of pesticides. A research team was able to view internal documents that show that dozens of shipments of problematic pesticides to countries in Asia and Africa have been approved since 2020.
    Approvals were granted not only for insecticides used in emergencies -- for example, to combat a locust plague -- but for herbicides and fungicides, as well. These are used against weeds and fungal infestations. Many of the pesticides approved for delivery by the FAO contain active ingredients that are no longer allowed in the EU due to their toxicity. When asked, the FAO replied that it does not supply pesticides that qualify as ‘highly hazardous’ and only sends those that are approved in the recipient country. But the FAO left questions about specific pesticide approvals unanswered.
    An insider who has worked at the FAO for many years also made serious accusations against the Chinese leadership, claiming that it was instrumentalizing the UN organization for geopolitical purposes. Further research shed light on the role of Chinese officers in the FAO. These Chinese nationals are employed by the FAO -- but their salaries are paid by China. Other countries also pay officers from their home countries. However, the regime in Beijing puts a premium on "political ideology" - as Chinese tender documents show. According to these documents, the officers must regularly report on their work at the FAO to the Chinese embassy in Rome. And none of this is set to change anytime soon: in July 2023, Qu Dongyu was re-elected as Director-General for another four years.
    #documentary #dwdocumentary
    ______
    DW Documentary gives you knowledge beyond the headlines. Watch top documentaries from German broadcasters and international production companies. Meet intriguing people, travel to distant lands, get a look behind the complexities of daily life and build a deeper understanding of current affairs and global events. Subscribe and explore the world around you with DW Documentary.
    Subscribe to:
    ⮞ DW Documentary (English): / dwdocumentary
    ⮞ DW Documental (Spanish): / dwdocumental
    ⮞ DW Documentary وثائقية دي دبليو (Arabic): / dwdocarabia
    ⮞ DW Doku (German): / dwdoku
    ⮞ DW Documentary हिन्दी (Hindi): / dwdochindi
    For more visit: www.dw.com/en/tv/docfilm/s-3610
    Follow DW Documentary on Instagram: / dwdocumentary
    Follow DW Documental on Facebook: / dwdocumental
    We kindly ask viewers to read and stick to the DW netiquette policy on our channel: p.dw.com/p/MF1G

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2 тис.

  • @segbwemabee5757
    @segbwemabee5757 2 місяці тому +638

    We want programmes on how IMF and World Bank elect their leaders.

    • @TheBrandNewICumEverywhere
      @TheBrandNewICumEverywhere 2 місяці тому +92

      they won't they are the ones financing this chanel

    • @chrislambaa7586
      @chrislambaa7586 2 місяці тому +21

      ​@@TheBrandNewICumEverywhereyou really are a troll bot.

    • @chrislambaa7586
      @chrislambaa7586 2 місяці тому +8

      Yes, we need better systems. What we build was a good first try and we have come a long way since we got democratic, with a few exceptions. However our system is far from perfect.

    • @lettucesalad3560
      @lettucesalad3560 2 місяці тому

      Those are not non-profit institutions using donations to operate like the United Nations.

    • @Microphunktv-jb3kj
      @Microphunktv-jb3kj 2 місяці тому +17

      @@TheBrandNewICumEverywhere dw is financed by german taxpayers if i'm not mistaken

  • @vitalimaly
    @vitalimaly 2 місяці тому +616

    I mean, a lot of chemicasl that are banned in EU are completely legal in US 🙄

    • @brucelee4president783
      @brucelee4president783 2 місяці тому +51

      Because our politicians are corrupt and bought by big interests, EU politicians have a little bit more integrity but by choice but by less monitary influence

    • @mybabychihuahua
      @mybabychihuahua 2 місяці тому +17

      Liar!

    • @vitalimaly
      @vitalimaly 2 місяці тому +56

      ​@@mybabychihuahua this is a well-known fact for foods and cosmetics, you can search it easily. idk for sure about chemicals in agriculture though

    • @kidd7359
      @kidd7359 2 місяці тому +41

      Propylene glycol is not fit for human consumption in the EU. In the US it is. What makes anyone think our governments care about it's citizens or any other.

    • @good8072
      @good8072 2 місяці тому +15

      The reverse is true as well

  • @mryitch
    @mryitch 2 місяці тому +122

    Curious who are the manufacturers for the pesticides. Are they Chinese or the bigger players like BASF and Bayer which are European. 🤔

    • @jacquelinemarie6325
      @jacquelinemarie6325 2 місяці тому +4

      All, according to what seems to be going on with the Food and Agriculture division of the UN these days, under the questionable stewardship of FAO's current director...(referencing the video by DW)

    • @YoutubeWatcher264
      @YoutubeWatcher264 2 місяці тому +2

      Check if majority shareholders or owners are now Chinese.

    • @tl1533
      @tl1533 2 місяці тому +1

      Both!

    • @dordorfromhk-hj5vo
      @dordorfromhk-hj5vo 2 місяці тому +16

      ​@@UA-camWatcher264No. BASF, Dupont, Dow, Bayer are all non Chinese

    • @YoutubeWatcher264
      @YoutubeWatcher264 2 місяці тому +9

      @@dordorfromhk-hj5vo They are non chinese obviously, but there could be chinese investors in there

  • @richardkong4387
    @richardkong4387 2 місяці тому +55

    Where is Monsanto?

    • @isj8827
      @isj8827 2 місяці тому +8

      Didn't they merge with Bayer or Bayer bought Monsanto?

    • @bobbyarthur-yf3yf
      @bobbyarthur-yf3yf 2 місяці тому +7

      Just a name change and on we Go

    • @isj8827
      @isj8827 2 місяці тому +4

      @@bobbyarthur-yf3yf that's how they roll in the wild west of mega companies

    • @Ryan-Fkrepublicnz
      @Ryan-Fkrepublicnz 2 місяці тому +9

      They were bought by Bayer. Now instead of three seed corporations there are two

    • @1964_AMU
      @1964_AMU 2 місяці тому +4

      Monsanto has been taken over by Bayer. It was not a friendly merger.

  • @MrLerwen
    @MrLerwen 2 місяці тому +381

    whoever controls the spice controls the universe

    • @LinhLe-cc9of
      @LinhLe-cc9of 2 місяці тому

      We never trust the government of China and you should know why .

    • @pthhhhht
      @pthhhhht 2 місяці тому +7

      ...the kind you get at gas stations and convenience stores?

    • @TerrenceJames-cz3bl
      @TerrenceJames-cz3bl 2 місяці тому +1

      @@pthhhhhtno.

    • @TheBrandNewICumEverywhere
      @TheBrandNewICumEverywhere 2 місяці тому +36

      whoever control DW control the info you get

    • @SophiaLegro
      @SophiaLegro 2 місяці тому +3

      @@TheBrandNewICumEverywhere
      Fortunately it’s still possible!

  • @Mayangone
    @Mayangone 2 місяці тому +294

    DW says that Germany pays FAO over $100 millions. In reality, Germany payment of $129 million is spread over 15 YEARS. That is equal to about $8.6 million per year. DW never mentions that China is contributing $10 millions per year.

    • @dansamarco1610
      @dansamarco1610 2 місяці тому +107

      DW often mischaracterises China as almost conniving, deceitful, malicious, untrustworthy. That's simply not the reality; China is very good at solving a problem with sheer will, numbers, mass, but it's often at the cost of efficiency, pollution, etc. There's myriad things I actually very strongly disagree with the Chinese government on, but if we are to actually discuss these dischordances with nuance, we first have to do away with this blatant orientalisation of China's people and government. Otherwise we'll just be stuck here, fudging the numbers for a point because the west can't conceive of China as anything but a mortal enemy. Frankly, the lack of imagination is just sad.

    • @richardkong4387
      @richardkong4387 2 місяці тому

      Its well known that DW, a MSM, has always being spewing disinformation and anti China rhetoric all the time to discredit the Chinese.

    • @GM-gh4dk
      @GM-gh4dk 2 місяці тому +11

      Provide proof...

    • @yahunatan7263
      @yahunatan7263 2 місяці тому

      Intresting 🧐

    • @toinfinityandyourmom2219
      @toinfinityandyourmom2219 2 місяці тому +18

      @@dansamarco1610 LOL chinese shill

  • @teoengchin
    @teoengchin 2 місяці тому +124

    Countries where Paraquat is NOT banned include the USA, Canada, Mexico and Australia

    • @andrewjones5973
      @andrewjones5973 2 місяці тому +6

      Except most of those countries have safety gear and literacy.

    • @netothong7231
      @netothong7231 2 місяці тому +19

      Europe is always right. how many years was europeans in africa? and now that china is using food as a way to develop a nation, rest of the world says its wrong. china is always wrong.

    • @simwilliams5358
      @simwilliams5358 2 місяці тому

      China is a leach

    • @gabor6259
      @gabor6259 2 місяці тому +13

      @@netothong7231 Just because the Europeans were wrong, that doesn't mean the Chinese are right.

    • @allgoo1990
      @allgoo1990 2 місяці тому +1

      "Countries where Paraquat is NOT banned include the USA, Canada, Mexico and Australia"
      ==
      Those countries have unusually high ratio of diseases, Parkinson's disease for example.

  • @johnnynephrite6147
    @johnnynephrite6147 2 місяці тому +11

    I saw Chinese farmers hand spraying their fields in Guangdong back in 2011. They were covered in it and didn't seem to understand the implications. Its quite possible that its still being done that way.

  • @carstenfischer5098
    @carstenfischer5098 2 місяці тому +211

    The UN is not what You think it is 🧐🤫

    • @Monica-gj2yx
      @Monica-gj2yx 2 місяці тому +26

      It's very corrupt . . .

    • @TheBrandNewICumEverywhere
      @TheBrandNewICumEverywhere 2 місяці тому +4

      its the Univesal Noddlers

    • @chrislambaa7586
      @chrislambaa7586 2 місяці тому +10

      And it might not be what we want it to be. That's why these documentaries are so important, so we can get the information out in the opening.

    • @mikaveekoo
      @mikaveekoo 2 місяці тому +15

      The US is not what You think it is 😖😳

    • @Microphunktv-jb3kj
      @Microphunktv-jb3kj 2 місяці тому

      @@mikaveekoo yeah its not democratic republic... it's fascist state , corps and gov in bed... atleast in that aspect, the lefties of america are right , european union is facist increasingly as well

  • @yili5376
    @yili5376 2 місяці тому +134

    paraquat is completely legal in most parts of the world including the US, Australia and Latin America. I wish DW could have more hard evidences on those cases but I know it would be difficult

    • @lettucesalad3560
      @lettucesalad3560 2 місяці тому

      Paraquat is a "restricted use" pesticide/herbicide in the US.. That means you have to be licensed in to buy and use it, and also trained to take precaution. Your comment is misleading.
      Paraquat was even banned for use within China - so they're selling to it Africa.
      Praquat has potentially been linked to causing Parkinson's disease

    • @mansoorsamadi1464
      @mansoorsamadi1464 2 місяці тому

      It's all just China bad

    • @silverforest4682
      @silverforest4682 2 місяці тому

      in may be legal, but it has to be controlled by those using it. I can see control steps not being performed in poorer countries. paraquat causes illnesses in the US and there are lawsuits.
      African countries must protect themselves with knowledge in their governments. Ban these substances.

    • @lettucesalad3560
      @lettucesalad3560 2 місяці тому +22

      In the US Paraquat is "Restricted Use" meaning that someone has to be trained and certified to purchase and use it.
      It's completely banned in 50 countries due to health concerns mainly to people who apply it. It's even banned for use in China.

    • @buildmotosykletist1987
      @buildmotosykletist1987 2 місяці тому +2

      It's not difficult. It is very safe.

  • @user-ln5pi6zp2t
    @user-ln5pi6zp2t 2 місяці тому +91

    The member countries re-elected Qu. QU Dongyu was re-elected to a second term as Director-General of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). In ballot by FAO member countries, Qu received a total of 168 out of 182 votes deposited.Jul 2, 2023. If he is re-elected by such a big margin the 168 out of 182 countries who supported him must have concluded he was doing a good job. It is a clear mandate.

    • @DegreesOfThree
      @DegreesOfThree 2 місяці тому +24

      How many of those votes were purchased like Cameroon? 🤔

    • @arfajob4246
      @arfajob4246 2 місяці тому

      All bought & paid for buddy, the chicoms' standard modus operandi, they have infiltrated the UN like the wuhan batflu.

    • @LukasJose-tk7go
      @LukasJose-tk7go 2 місяці тому +7

      Money talk

    • @jaxbronson9734
      @jaxbronson9734 2 місяці тому

      China Evil

    • @Ilus01
      @Ilus01 2 місяці тому +9

      Of course votes can be purchased and money certainly talks. On Dec 12, 2024, UN General Assembly voted for a Gaza ceasefire resolution, 153 countries out of 193 member states supported the resolution, up from 120 votes in last October while the against votes down from 14 to 10. I am sure the US paid those 33 countries to vote for the resolution so that will US standing out in those 10 countries who votes against, further demonstrate our exceptionalism. And who are the magnificent 10, they are the US, Israel, Austria, Czechia, Guatemala, Liberia, Micronesia, Nauru, Paraguay, Papua New Guinea. Of these you may never heard of tiny countries despised US paid off those 33 countries to vote Yes, they don’t need the money so they voted against with their sense of justice.

  • @inferno0020
    @inferno0020 2 місяці тому +6

    Power doesn't corrupt; corruption empowers.

  • @TheStockwell
    @TheStockwell 2 місяці тому +180

    This is going to sound defeatist and cynical, but the 21st century looks as if it's going to be about nations doing whatever they want with no genuine means of stopping them.
    All the hand-wringing in the world won't accomplish anything when nations and corporations know there's nothing reining them in.
    Best wishes from Vermont ❄️

    • @Tuxon86
      @Tuxon86 2 місяці тому +27

      21st Century??? It as always been like that. The relative peace you've enjoyed is the anomaly, not the norm. You can't remove nationalism and greed from human societies, it's an integral part of human nature. In the few societies that tried it has all failed with both of those traits comming back with a vengeance.

    • @theaceofknaves3285
      @theaceofknaves3285 2 місяці тому

      Take your head out of sand for a while and look around, for how many times USA has used UN agencies to further it's geopolitical interests, and disregarded UN when they could. Dw has no guts to make a docu about defunding UNRWA a few days ago, they have gone too deep in the uSA rabbit hole

    • @malloc7108
      @malloc7108 2 місяці тому +5

      That's sort of the narrative that nations who want to do whatever they want will push. All you can do is push back.

    • @Tuxon86
      @Tuxon86 2 місяці тому +4

      @@malloc7108 It doesn't work. All that this does is replacing one side with the other who then proceed to do the same thing as tghe previous one. This is real life, not Star Trek.

    • @Novastar.SaberCombat
      @Novastar.SaberCombat 2 місяці тому +7

      Rich gotta rich. Poor gotta suffer, serve, and submit. Accept it. Be rich, and you *WIN*! If you aren't rich, then accept your servitude with dignity before your death.

  • @davidhudson5452
    @davidhudson5452 2 місяці тому +24

    Just follow the Money

  • @zigorro3478
    @zigorro3478 2 місяці тому +47

    Excellent conduct around the annonymity of your source

    • @TheBrandNewICumEverywhere
      @TheBrandNewICumEverywhere 2 місяці тому +13

      yes its easy when you make them up

    • @chrislambaa7586
      @chrislambaa7586 2 місяці тому +8

      ​@@TheBrandNewICumEverywhere I have seen your troll comments in all threads. Are you are russian bot or is China beginning to learn from russia?

    • @Brighton-qd3md
      @Brighton-qd3md 2 місяці тому

      @@chrislambaa7586 Russian bots & ccp Wumao are everywhere!

    • @dfindy
      @dfindy 2 місяці тому +8

      @@chrislambaa7586 Hi, Chris, is there a rule that everyone in this world should agree with you, and if not, they are Russian bots?

    • @chrislambaa7586
      @chrislambaa7586 2 місяці тому

      @@dfindy have you seen all the other comments I talk about?

  • @kelldrummond1759
    @kelldrummond1759 2 місяці тому +9

    It takes alot to make me cry. Thank you for this story, even though many will miss the point!!

  • @teoengchin
    @teoengchin 2 місяці тому +140

    If the EU was doing such a good job of managing their agriculture sector, why are all their farmers protesting against their own government's all the time?

    • @borgiobesieger2806
      @borgiobesieger2806 2 місяці тому +4

      Because of the climate religion! Wat get promoted and makes a few rich and farmers more poor and lose there lands 🤷🏼

    • @wordscapes5690
      @wordscapes5690 2 місяці тому +20

      Because the right to protest is legal in Germany.

    • @aceman00ify
      @aceman00ify 2 місяці тому +7

      @@wordscapes5690 Its because the EU is telling its members to stop growing food and close down all farming. Thats why they are protesting.

    • @wordscapes5690
      @wordscapes5690 2 місяці тому +8

      @@aceman00ify and because they have the right to protest..,.

    • @georgesos
      @georgesos 2 місяці тому +1

      For totally different reasons. In Greece they protest the cuts.

  • @ssir5927
    @ssir5927 2 місяці тому +144

    So glad to see DW start to diversify from their "Russia Bad" programming to "China Also Bad"

    • @JH-pv6rd
      @JH-pv6rd 2 місяці тому +34

      Both are bad.

    • @arpitkumar2981
      @arpitkumar2981 2 місяці тому

      Daddy US 😂​@@JH-pv6rd

    • @johnc1873
      @johnc1873 2 місяці тому

      nah, the ones calling others bad are just projecting themselves@@JH-pv6rd

    • @takemikazuchihachishiki7788
      @takemikazuchihachishiki7788 2 місяці тому +11

      ​@@abdiazizmohamed1887can you explain to me how two authoritarian countries are good?

    • @fs5775
      @fs5775 2 місяці тому +16

      Glad that DW isn't hiding that China is also bad. We have been worried about Germany on this front for a while now..

  • @leonitolatorre1860
    @leonitolatorre1860 2 місяці тому +2

    These are so sad to hear this huge problem for food supplies... like us in the Phillipines..

  • @crishhari5903
    @crishhari5903 2 місяці тому +54

    If the global south is made to follow the high standards of EU, starvation will be regular in those regions. Of course, it would be best to follow EU's standard, but there is a reason even America has low standards than EU, i.e. it cost too much to reach and maintain those standards.
    EU's standards will be better for sustainablilty and future generations without a doubt, however if people are already starving and fighting for food there will be no good future anyways. Wanting the best is great but economic is grounded on reality. If the economy is too poor, it can't support the lifestyle/ standards of richer developed countries.
    In every crisis the world has faced, western countries seem to be more and more out of touch with the global south. Vaccine hoarding during covid, unilateral sanctions on Russia leading to increase in food and fuel prices( punish Russia for that stupid attack, but not the rest of the global south), Israel crisis, red sea blockade and using human right only when it's suits their narrative. This video is the latest out of touch view of west.
    With all the crisis going on around the world, famine is still being avoided. That is really good news, but that is not according to the west. Who cares if famine happens even now and than, what matter the most is are the rules being followed.

    • @braudhadoch3432
      @braudhadoch3432 2 місяці тому

      The north gives southern countries TRILLIONS in aid. Why is there so much incompetence and Corruption south of the border?

    • @stevenhenry5267
      @stevenhenry5267 2 місяці тому +1

      Silly

    • @angela2726
      @angela2726 2 місяці тому +1

      The rules are for a reason. To protect the lives of the farmers

    • @user-yu7bg2qz7d
      @user-yu7bg2qz7d 2 місяці тому

      ​@@angela2726Sri Lanka went bankrupt because of the promotion of green agriculture, but the people who died as a result do not appear in the news

    • @angela2726
      @angela2726 2 місяці тому +1

      @@user-yu7bg2qz7d you can't just promote green agriculture. It has to be thought through with efficiency. And it seems to me that if the world gets hotter and dryer and you have less and less bees food won't grow well and more and more people will die of hunger

  • @benjamindemontgomery6317
    @benjamindemontgomery6317 2 місяці тому +5

    I Think Someone needs to be Fired. And Shina needs to provide funds to help the people harmed by these transgressions.

  • @56kof
    @56kof 2 місяці тому +4

    A few years ago president Xi said that "China has the right to hold its own rice bowl" - and he ment by any means and at any cost for Africa and the rest of the world.

  • @lisamanz6641
    @lisamanz6641 Місяць тому +1

    So much deeper than where these chemicals are being used- read between the lines

  • @Reciprocity_Soils
    @Reciprocity_Soils 2 місяці тому +25

    Evidence here supports the need for more local actions towards community farmers and ranchers. Plant, grow and support local city and suburban gardens. Grow holistically with cover crops. Feed the soil by reducing and eliminating the use of pesticides, fungicides and fertilizers. Use Gabe Brown's ideas and Permaculture Principles to protect and nourish the soil micro-biology. Feed your soil. Feed your family and neighbors.

    • @norman_5623
      @norman_5623 2 місяці тому +3

      What do you do when the locusts arrive to consume your crops?

    • @Reciprocity_Soils
      @Reciprocity_Soils 2 місяці тому

      Good question@@norman_5623 Any action might be hard pressed to contend with a swarm such as the one shown in the video. Nevertheless, when the soil is healthy and the cover crops attract beneficial insects which outnumber the "bad" insects, then locusts don't have a chance to grow so large. Also, polyculture farms and orchards attract other wildlife such as birds and small mammals which eat locusts for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Healthy soils and proper permaculture management of a farm, ranch, and/or garden provides a balanced ecology of wildlife and nutritious food for people. It isn't magic and requires time and effort and the results are long term and beneficial. What else would you recommend?

    • @davidkottman3440
      @davidkottman3440 2 місяці тому

      ​@@norman_5623My grandfather told of the locust swarm arriving & consumed everything green in the fields and then ate all the paint off the gates & barns until they looked like New wood!

    • @widodoakrom3938
      @widodoakrom3938 2 місяці тому

      True

  • @gregorydesleskine3413
    @gregorydesleskine3413 2 місяці тому +11

    Are people finally beginning to wake up? Let's hope so before its too late.

  • @hageryehiashalaby1786
    @hageryehiashalaby1786 2 місяці тому

    not surprised ..This is the case in most countries and in most development organizations

  • @jaanireel
    @jaanireel 2 місяці тому +35

    00:08 United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation influenced by China's interests.
    04:55 China's influence in the FAO and concerns about Director-General Qu Dongyu
    08:55 China's influence and control within the Food and Agriculture Organization.
    12:56 China's Belt and Road initiative aims to reshape international relations and trade routes
    16:44 China's influence on FAO and pesticide use raise serious concerns.
    20:18 Pesticide poisoning is a major problem in Africa.
    23:52 FAO's use of banned pesticides and Chinese influence
    27:24 FAO project in São Tomé and Príncipe
    31:35 China's strategic interests in building ports in São Tomé and Príncipe
    34:56 China aims to leverage the UN's FAO and Panama to gain advantage in agricultural shipping.
    37:49 Concerns raised about FAO's relationship with corporate interests.
    41:05 The influence of China on the FAO is a concern.

    • @Microphunktv-jb3kj
      @Microphunktv-jb3kj 2 місяці тому

      China's Belt and Road initiative is failed project... so many of those projects are derelict , there's no need for roads, when US and EU moving away from China production bec ause of their Maoism ,
      a nation wich teaches its citizens to hate and kill americans and japanese.. needless to say US and EU want to not trade with them... china isnt like russia and cant sustain itself.. china would collapse if nato sanctions them

    • @silverforest4682
      @silverforest4682 2 місяці тому +3

      this needs to be addressed by the UN. Germany could withdraw their donations.

    • @fuzzyspackage
      @fuzzyspackage 2 місяці тому +1

      ty

  • @mauriciojimenez7704
    @mauriciojimenez7704 2 місяці тому +61

    Came for the meat, stayed for the dark music

    • @Normality_9
      @Normality_9 2 місяці тому +2

      Yeah, it was like a movie😂

    • @freedomlife2024
      @freedomlife2024 2 місяці тому

      ​@@Normality_9yeah,yeah😢
      Who lose the horse

    • @fs5775
      @fs5775 2 місяці тому

      Germans never let us down when it comes to dark music

    • @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m
      @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m 2 місяці тому

      the west always add these dark music/pics on anything about china

    • @andrewjones5973
      @andrewjones5973 2 місяці тому

      @@kenho-wr5ul2rh7m cope

  • @katlegokgethiliphoko
    @katlegokgethiliphoko 2 місяці тому +95

    America and Europe does the same thing but no one talks about it🤷🏾‍♀️
    What about LemaGran, Monsanto and Syngenta? It's suddenly a threat when it's caused by the Chinese. 22:20

    • @Kent-ft8vj
      @Kent-ft8vj 2 місяці тому

      兄弟,你是聪明人,这德国之声一直是美国资本控制的喉舌,除了每天摸黑中国,他一无是处,欢迎来中国游玩❤

    • @pthhhhht
      @pthhhhht 2 місяці тому

      ...no...the American people have been using social graces, political protocol and small local voices to try and shut this shit down, but greed is a real thing with octopus arms, tons of money, and many feeder fish frothing at the maw to get their hands in it....

    • @nata6025
      @nata6025 2 місяці тому

      I was thinking the same thing, where is this energy and investigative journalism when corruption comes from. the States and Europe. Not saying China is good, they clearly aren't, but it smacks of propoganda when the same level of tone isn't applied to other bad acting countries

    • @jacquelinemarie6325
      @jacquelinemarie6325 2 місяці тому +9

      the last one you mention: Syngenta, is state owned by CCP in china. you need to watch the video again...but yes, there's blame everywhere, no doubt. wouldn't it be great if people could just treat each other better, like without the poison and the bombs, for instance??

    • @YoutubeWatcher264
      @YoutubeWatcher264 2 місяці тому +10

      There are videos about Monsanto, tons of it. Probably other agrochemical companies too. But of course you choose to ignore it.

  • @invit87
    @invit87 2 місяці тому +14

    this program never mentions that agriculture in China is collective, and at the same time they keep trying to say it without saying it...

  • @alexkostoff6587
    @alexkostoff6587 2 місяці тому +70

    Hmm interesting.. Thats how Australia feels about the world-cup bid. Funny how Europe accepts some corruption, but suddenly takes a distaste to it in other areas.

    • @ericdane7769
      @ericdane7769 2 місяці тому +6

      Huh? Do explain. European football associations (western ones at least) opposed the grants of world-cup to Qatar and Russia. It's not them who bribed African nations. But yes, FIFA is in Switzerland, and headed for decades by 2 Swiss dudes, and that is technically Europe, you are correct.

    • @camielkotte
      @camielkotte 2 місяці тому

      We've seen corruption and when you clean it out, you know it creeps back in like water under the door.
      Big Money attracts corruption. Always has. Human nature.

    • @markvanderknoop131
      @markvanderknoop131 2 місяці тому

      The world cup isn't a European institution.

    • @alexkostoff6587
      @alexkostoff6587 2 місяці тому

      headquarters Based in Switzerland, office in zurich lmao

    • @markvanderknoop131
      @markvanderknoop131 2 місяці тому

      @alexkostoff6587 it had to have an office somewhere.
      You know that when voting tha south American and African are the ones bought.
      So your absolutely talking air.

  • @detectiveofmoneypolitics
    @detectiveofmoneypolitics 2 місяці тому +16

    Economic investigator Frank G Melbourne Australia is following this very informative content cheers Frank 😊

    • @takingbacktheplanet
      @takingbacktheplanet 2 місяці тому +1

      lol. at first i thought this was funny, or weird, or something along those lines (trolls are interesting therse days EH!?) - but....... cheers m8. :) DW is usually pretty good about keeping its finger on the pulse of such things! 😊(though unfortunately quite often with what seems to be a well masked but still obvious bias in the reporting - not that any of their intentions are ebad, truly if anything they are probably a major force and excellent partner for the betterment of things that i consider good and wonderful in this life, i just sometimes wonder if they really had to take the narrative they did in during certain episodes now and then. but, no reporting is perfect :) .) (remembering from personal experience that you can also often lose potential allies because of making things (issues) a bigger deal/concern/priority than they are, or at least than what the person/people can take upon themselves at that point on that subject, that is...)

    • @norman_5623
      @norman_5623 2 місяці тому

      Maybe he could investigate some of those pesticides that are banned in the EU but allowed in Australia.

    • @buildmotosykletist1987
      @buildmotosykletist1987 2 місяці тому

      @@norman_5623 : The EU bans totally safe chemicals. Why ?

    • @norman_5623
      @norman_5623 2 місяці тому

      @@buildmotosykletist1987Toxicology is not a discipline with clear, simple, verifiable, agreed-upon answers. It's impossible to prove that a chemical is "totally safe." Ask yourself, "How do we know whether a particular chemical is safe?" "Unsafe" often means, one (or more) case of cancer (or another disease) per 1,000 farm workers who are exposed to it, or per 1 million people who eat it. If you're trying to prove that a chemical is totally safe, you won't find any studies where researchers deliberately exposed thousands of subjects to the chemical to find out (as you would in medicine). You'll find studies where animals with high doses of the chemical developed cancer, or studies where farm workers exposed to the chemical (and many other chemicals) developed cancer. The first thing to do is throw out the studies that don't tell you whether the workers were smoking cigarettes. But you can't control for every other factor. Look up the studies that Herbert Needleman did to find that lead was toxic in children. Reasonable scientists can look at the same studies and disagree. Suppose one study finds that a chemical is strongly associated with cancer in workers who are exposed to it. European scientists could read that study and say, "there's a chance that this chemical causes cancer, there are alternatives that don't have that risk, so let's not take that risk." American scientists could look at the same study and say, "This study only shows association, not causation, so you haven't proved it's dangerous." In addition, in the US the chemical companies have strong lobbies that contribute money to politicians to influence these decisions. So that's why the EU bans chemicals that the US doesn't.

    • @mariusvanc
      @mariusvanc 2 місяці тому

      ​@@buildmotosykletist1987because they are effective, and we can't have that.

  • @abdullahibrahim8938
    @abdullahibrahim8938 2 місяці тому +96

    Why do you think an international organization should follow the EU domestic laws?
    If a chemical is banned in Europe but legal in other places, you should not be shocked that others use it, because you no longer colonize them and your rules does not apply to them.
    And by the way, Paraquat is legal in the US, so don't act like China is committing a genocide by allowing Africa to use it.

    • @jasonjean2901
      @jasonjean2901 2 місяці тому +8

      Well said!

    • @GM-gh4dk
      @GM-gh4dk 2 місяці тому +11

      Any UN organisation should have higher standards than a nation state. Your argument is pure sophistry

    • @chencenzhang1545
      @chencenzhang1545 2 місяці тому +14

      @@GM-gh4dk
      Stupidest Opinion i have ever heard.

    • @chihirostargazer6573
      @chihirostargazer6573 2 місяці тому

      I wouldn't be bragging about a chemical being allowed in the United States... our government has already proved they won't think twice about poisoning citizens for profit.

    • @fuzzyspackage
      @fuzzyspackage 2 місяці тому

      Its all about human safety standards.. Then you wonder why europeans thing yalls 2nd,3rd world savages.🤔

  • @Glance852
    @Glance852 2 місяці тому +1

    Why not having or providing the farmers for health monitor, ie, implementing regular health check or blood check for ensuring them for work environment. Then we can truly tell how the farms are affecting farmers for a more accurate conclusion to see what it is? It can be a good supplements to this video and reporting, imo

  • @8wy51
    @8wy51 2 місяці тому +1

    OMG! Pulling the wool over our eyes, again, and again, and again, and again, and again.......

  • @stanleykubrick8786
    @stanleykubrick8786 2 місяці тому +27

    The "United Nations" of all things - how depressing. In episode two we'll be told that Amway has taken over The United Nations.

  • @NorCalMoDo
    @NorCalMoDo 2 місяці тому +95

    DW has been biased with ALL its English language documentaries and news commentaries on China in recent years.
    Not sure why... The only reason could assume would be DW English programming is managed by an American Editor.
    Has DW ever examined the influences and grips by the U.S. on UN and int'l organizations?

    • @paulogonzales7431
      @paulogonzales7431 2 місяці тому

      DW is looking into china because of chinese bans on eu exports

    • @ync2467
      @ync2467 2 місяці тому

      Exactly, this media is obviously obsessed with demonised China from all angles it can imagine

    • @Tate.TopG.
      @Tate.TopG. 2 місяці тому

      Well said. All those channels are English propaganda.

    • @user-te4of2fq5d
      @user-te4of2fq5d 2 місяці тому

      Unless you are discussing corruption on every level, you aren't telling the truth about China. For 100 years the CCP's sole goal has been world domination by any means necessary. From its inception, the CCP has had no regard for human life in its quest. The fastest aging population on the planet, it will cease to exist in its present form in 7-10 years as a result of population deceleration.

    • @michaelthompson9548
      @michaelthompson9548 2 місяці тому

      China does even worse against 'the west', so who cares..? Be equally or more critical of China if you play this card.

  • @chatwithjat
    @chatwithjat 2 місяці тому

    Whats the fire song that starts at 28:00, editors are putting out bangaz

  • @nolassko
    @nolassko 2 місяці тому +1

    Can I have your permission to spread this? With a link to your channel of course.

  • @epeeypen
    @epeeypen 2 місяці тому +31

    watching the western countires talk about how being loyal to your country is bad.. is amazing

    • @Microphunktv-jb3kj
      @Microphunktv-jb3kj 2 місяці тому

      because the agenda is global state and evolution of human race to spacve-fearing in nano/ai age
      ever-increasing size of the government :D

    • @georgesos
      @georgesos 2 місяці тому

      "Loyal" as in poisoning millions?
      Sorry but no.
      China is a corrupt mafia state .

    • @gabor6259
      @gabor6259 2 місяці тому

      If your country is a dictatorship, then being loyal to the government _is_ bad.

    • @donHooligan
      @donHooligan 2 місяці тому

      colonizer countries w/war economies...disturbing.

  • @maruminc
    @maruminc 2 місяці тому +17

    Thank you for this good investigation into such an important topic

    • @norman_5623
      @norman_5623 2 місяці тому +4

      Yes, but it seems to have a certain amount of bias. It's a journalistic bias. It's a better story with an evil villain. When you ask, "Hey, aren't we doing the same thing?" the story gets a lot more complicated and harder to follow.

    • @MsFallenPrime
      @MsFallenPrime 2 місяці тому

      It's such a terrible investigation. They are simply only crying about pesticides being used which are banned in just the EU and accepted globally.

  • @Desyo-wn7ib
    @Desyo-wn7ib 2 місяці тому +2

    I'm very happy with this program, even happier with people's reactions that it's more mature, it shows that they understood the general idea that it's purely political than the truth

  • @marlenesabiooliva7667
    @marlenesabiooliva7667 2 місяці тому +1

    Thank you for this very factual video. God bless!

  • @Avatar_2025
    @Avatar_2025 2 місяці тому +14

    Pesticides approval is done by Local government. First ban GMOs because most of them cannot survive without pesticides.

    • @jacquelinemarie6325
      @jacquelinemarie6325 2 місяці тому

      corruption up and down and all around it seems....no doubt these pesticide producers are behind the GMO issue too....

    • @davidkottman3440
      @davidkottman3440 2 місяці тому

      No, you have that backwards. None of the GMO crops require pesticides for survival. They survive the use of specific herbicides that normally injure the crop.

    • @davidkottman3440
      @davidkottman3440 2 місяці тому

      You really shouldn't spread misinformation in the comments.. please learn the truth.

  • @rediebearexabior8585
    @rediebearexabior8585 2 місяці тому +57

    Let's talk about Israel grip on the U.S

    • @reivell3699
      @reivell3699 2 місяці тому +2

      Nah lets talk about US grip on Germany LOL

    • @dowmein
      @dowmein 2 місяці тому

      Lets talk about Chinese grip on the FAO.

    • @jamilbrugsen1362
      @jamilbrugsen1362 2 місяці тому

      go and find that video do not distaract with chinese bots

    • @donHooligan
      @donHooligan 2 місяці тому

      IMF

    • @Matthew_Loutner
      @Matthew_Loutner 21 день тому

      No "grip" and nothing to talk about. Stop making up problems.

  • @anccologan5570
    @anccologan5570 2 місяці тому +1

    The comments are all sober, I'm glad.

  • @Charlie39393
    @Charlie39393 2 місяці тому +1

    Glad somebody is speaking up…

  • @aswinyargasnoum2709
    @aswinyargasnoum2709 2 місяці тому +2

    People in this country should learn to use these insects as dietary supplements because they contain a lot of beneficial protein instead of meat.

  • @humanist6256
    @humanist6256 2 місяці тому +5

    @deutsche welle could you please educate us the proportion of FAO staff with their nationalities. If I’m not wrong ~25% of the staff is from 3 countries (Italy, France and USA).

  • @Speeds1486
    @Speeds1486 2 місяці тому +5

    At 23:57
    Wonder why they wouldn't show the USA? Maybe I missed it...

  • @reginaerekson9139
    @reginaerekson9139 Місяць тому

    34:47 sea level rise is causing supply chain issues there - ships are too heavy raising costs

  • @mohammedlamgouni8020
    @mohammedlamgouni8020 23 дні тому

    Thanks...keep going...

  • @PS1212
    @PS1212 2 місяці тому +44

    This video is really badly edited, yall say alot without saying anything for most of it.

    • @bobbyarthur-yf3yf
      @bobbyarthur-yf3yf 2 місяці тому +3

      Well i learned a lot
      Here of what is clearly bad self based practice - corruption

    • @_.F0X._
      @_.F0X._ 2 місяці тому +3

      Very informative, in my opinion

    • @bobbyarthur-yf3yf
      @bobbyarthur-yf3yf 2 місяці тому

      @@_.F0X._ exactly

  • @MohNaz-ly6yx
    @MohNaz-ly6yx 2 місяці тому +32

    euro news loves them china 😂😂😂

  • @InviktusRex
    @InviktusRex 2 місяці тому

    This video could have been 2/3rd it's current length without all the dramatic pauses for the narrator

  • @reginaerekson9139
    @reginaerekson9139 Місяць тому

    20:18 so what’s up with bayer and Monsanto?

  • @alexandragc6817
    @alexandragc6817 2 місяці тому +9

    Great documentary!

  • @norman_5623
    @norman_5623 2 місяці тому +11

    Many of these compounds that your interviewee was so shocked by are approved for use in the United States: malathion, thiamethoxan, paraquat, acetochlor, atrazine.

    • @buildmotosykletist1987
      @buildmotosykletist1987 2 місяці тому +1

      Because they are safe and very effective and useful.

    • @GM-gh4dk
      @GM-gh4dk 2 місяці тому +1

      Why does it matter what's legal in the US? Does it not matter more that people in vulnerable countries are protected? You're just misdirection the argument...

    • @buildmotosykletist1987
      @buildmotosykletist1987 2 місяці тому +2

      @@GM-gh4dk : Are people in vulnerable countries in danger ? Is the first question.

    • @GM-gh4dk
      @GM-gh4dk 2 місяці тому +1

      @@buildmotosykletist1987 Yes. As someone who happens to live in Africa, I can tell you emphatically yes, that is why the FAO exists in the first place and again you're misdirecting. The fact that it is legal as a controlled substance in the US does not make it OK to distribute it indiscriminately without training or protective gear is tantamount to chemical warfare, but let's not blame China for that because you might just end up under the heal of the regime you serve.

    • @buildmotosykletist1987
      @buildmotosykletist1987 2 місяці тому

      @@GM-gh4dk : Yet all scientific studies say it is safe.

  • @duckweedy
    @duckweedy 2 місяці тому

    What about Monsanto which is still be using worldwide despite causing cancer?

  • @OurGodIsLove
    @OurGodIsLove 2 місяці тому +1

    May God bless our World!

  • @jasonjean2901
    @jasonjean2901 2 місяці тому +38

    What a disjointed mess of an analysis. I thoroughly enjoyed the spooky music that often went along with this anti-China propaganda. The fear of the pesticide that the E.U. has banned was never put into context; specifically, that the E.U. bans tons of products and foods that the rest of the world, including the U.S. and Canada, do not.

    • @michaelsheehan7316
      @michaelsheehan7316 2 місяці тому

      US and Canada are run by corporations under the guise of freedom. If its not banned here its because of capitalism not because its safe..

    • @BRUCE_the_MOOSE_
      @BRUCE_the_MOOSE_ 2 місяці тому

      Never trust the Commies

    • @reivell3699
      @reivell3699 2 місяці тому +1

      Also, its always "Unidentified whistleblower" LOL.

  • @mikelixx
    @mikelixx 2 місяці тому +12

    Everyone is looking out for their own interest. Same for America and Germany. Why should we surprised.

    • @Microphunktv-jb3kj
      @Microphunktv-jb3kj 2 місяці тому

      china lands are not very fertile, need 6x more fertilizzers...
      china literally stocking food for several years already, prepping for war...
      not sure what's the food panic.. their populatiojn will collapse by half due to one child policy and how fcked up and badly managed the country is... noone making children in that oipressive society

    • @danc.5509
      @danc.5509 2 місяці тому

      That's the issue....there is no planet B. Acid rain, soil leaching, radioactive oceans...the planet will be affected, despite groupings into countries. Looking out for your own doesn't apply so well when there's a global agenda.

  • @ronaldmaburu6389
    @ronaldmaburu6389 2 місяці тому +1

    What wrong with those developments

  • @SuperKwame1
    @SuperKwame1 2 місяці тому

    I am from Ghana, and I have lived in The west for the last 37 years. I have always told my African brothers that there are no free Lunches!

  • @juliobrodriguez3919
    @juliobrodriguez3919 2 місяці тому +11

    Why the one sided commentary? This is not a serious piece unless it is a balance piece.

  • @Mothman_Libra
    @Mothman_Libra 2 місяці тому +48

    Love this channel. Good to see a non-american less biased perspective for once!

    • @stunstar4553
      @stunstar4553 2 місяці тому +17

      Europeans believe that UN should use European food quality standards, but is this possible? Can African countries afford this price. China has never experienced locust infestations, and despite using these pesticides, their average lifespan is still higher than that of US.
      Those former European officials are crying now because they lost an election

    • @pthhhhht
      @pthhhhht 2 місяці тому +3

      ...trust and believe, it is only a few Americans who have that biased perspective, and most of those people are on somebody else's payroll even if the American taxpayers are unwittingly contributing to it....

    • @DW-op7ly
      @DW-op7ly 2 місяці тому

      China brought hundreds of millions out of poverty
      Why shouldn’t China have input
      Much better than the leader of the west, the USA and its allies.
      Causing the demise or assisting in causing the demise of people in 20 countries in Just Africa alone

    • @che8866
      @che8866 2 місяці тому

      German media is a cesspool. DW has a few good documentaries but it’s mostly full of bullshit. If your looking for an unbiased opinion that perhaps differs from those you will hear in the United States, German media is not a good option.

    • @TheBrandNewICumEverywhere
      @TheBrandNewICumEverywhere 2 місяці тому +16

      its western propaganda lol just with a another hat

  • @mariteswolthers5848
    @mariteswolthers5848 2 місяці тому +2

    Corruption and greed

  • @allgoo196
    @allgoo196 2 місяці тому

    22:41
    1/2 of Malawi work in agriculture, 3/4 of them die of pesticide poisoning.
    That's a staggering number.

  • @tedchandran
    @tedchandran 2 місяці тому +16

    Jai Hinduja. The World Bank will not give loans to countries wishing to be self-sufficient in food production.

    • @fuzzyspackage
      @fuzzyspackage 2 місяці тому +1

      Food production requires adv tech patents?

    • @stevenhenry5267
      @stevenhenry5267 2 місяці тому +1

      Who says you have to take loans?

    • @leptir7110
      @leptir7110 2 місяці тому +1

      Neka svaka država proizvodi za sebe ,kako kome grah padne ,one koje nemaju prirodne resurse neka smanje populaciju ,kondome ,edukacija o broju djece itd

    • @studytime2570
      @studytime2570 2 місяці тому

      wumao detected.

    • @studytime2570
      @studytime2570 2 місяці тому

      how's the cold in beijing chang? evergrande giving homes yet?

  • @ANONAAAAAAAAA
    @ANONAAAAAAAAA 2 місяці тому +46

    I'm from Japan and while I have to admit we are having geopolitical complications with China or CCP all the time, I've started thinking that China is actually not the worst part of this world when compared with European counties who just don't stop spitting their hypocrisy bs.

    • @4thought___
      @4thought___ 2 місяці тому +3

      That's what Xi said.

    • @widodoakrom3938
      @widodoakrom3938 2 місяці тому

      Chinese and Japanese is cognate nations

    • @davidbanner6230
      @davidbanner6230 2 місяці тому

      @ANONAAAAAAAA :... How dare you, we do stop on Christmas day, every four years....

    • @jparsit
      @jparsit 22 дні тому

      You are right. If the elites are warmongers, they like to make blood money, genocide, lies, force, and take away others. Viewers of this DW must consider this video a big lie.

  • @ahjotland6721
    @ahjotland6721 10 днів тому +1

    Why was the headline read as China grab when China was democratically elected by over 100 countries? This program might be influenced by rival companies, for example like Mansanto. Interestingly, why is the biggest agriculture manufacturer of fertilizer not mentioned? Was it because Monsanto has been sued for violations of selling dangerous chemicals?

  • @mariomovillon1613
    @mariomovillon1613 2 місяці тому +1

    He who knows how to control the grains, reigns.

  • @orawancarlile6192
    @orawancarlile6192 2 місяці тому +4

    The US has been given $801 million between 2018-2020, the largest contributor.

  • @weekim2165
    @weekim2165 2 місяці тому +6

    How long was UK in debt to US for WW2?

    • @jacquelinemarie6325
      @jacquelinemarie6325 2 місяці тому +2

      until the year 1996? I may be off a few years but it was quite a while. I don't understand why debts can't be forgiven on a regular basis? wouldn't it be great if everyone could forget about such nonsense and finally get equality really going!! "sigh"

  • @datianlongan5567
    @datianlongan5567 2 місяці тому +1

    They may entitled to the $11B USD payout if Roundup was used instead

  • @Nnamdi-wi2nu
    @Nnamdi-wi2nu 2 місяці тому +1

    Please dear good people that wants the best for us if it were the USA that is using the FAO for it's benefits, would we be hearing this kind of observation

  • @ruslanahmed2464
    @ruslanahmed2464 2 місяці тому +24

    Good research and effort but I wonder y DW is pancing on it . All of influencial countries are useing UN for their own interests. Does US is not doing it IMF WB WHO are not being used for US agendas in different countries. Is DW is no naeve or like BBC biased on every real issue of the world.

    • @Microphunktv-jb3kj
      @Microphunktv-jb3kj 2 місяці тому

      who is even more corrupt than UN , WHO litetrally financed 50% by china communist party...
      have you forgot where the virus came for ffs.

    • @orawancarlile6192
      @orawancarlile6192 2 місяці тому +2

      The intention of using the funds from the UN originally for the betterment of all humans on this earth is to lessen hunger, so the war would not happen to disrupt lives. But the recipients are the ones who siphon to one's purpose differ than what its intention.

    • @f.galbot4075
      @f.galbot4075 2 місяці тому

      Agree😮

  • @Xamufam
    @Xamufam 2 місяці тому +8

    Introduce birds against the locusts

    • @paulskiye6930
      @paulskiye6930 2 місяці тому +2

      In China, they use ducks

    • @Xamufam
      @Xamufam 2 місяці тому +7

      ​@@paulskiye6930in China they killed the sparrow and the insects increased and caused enormous famine

    • @paulskiye6930
      @paulskiye6930 2 місяці тому +2

      @@Xamufam that's like so long time ago xD during the cultural revolution

    • @dedetudor.
      @dedetudor. 2 місяці тому +3

      ​@@paulskiye6930history ignored is doomed to be repeated?

    • @hillockfarm8404
      @hillockfarm8404 2 місяці тому

      When the locusts turn into their swarm form they become poison, so no natural predation.

  • @r.a.v.sgaming483
    @r.a.v.sgaming483 2 місяці тому +1

    This documentary is superb and exposes corruption at the highest level ever seen. Just to add a point the documentary at 19:51 shows a map of India which is distorted. Actually the editing team has painted POK as a part of Pakistan so kindly fix it from next time. Apart from it all the footages and the story telling was superb. Always glad to see more of this geo-political documentary from DW

  • @gurmunegeri178
    @gurmunegeri178 Місяць тому

    I wish you could also do similar investigation on the WHO as well, you’ll be surprised what you might find.Another baffling thing is the timing to release this investigative documentary. A day after someone is awarded with world food Award , don’t assume many are not observing.

  • @PeterTodd
    @PeterTodd 2 місяці тому +46

    Good reporting.
    However, I hope that viewers aren't so naïve to think that China is the only bad actor in this arena.
    All major countries employ similar strategies wherever and whenever they get the opportunity.
    That's just the nature of greed and power.

    • @chrislambaa7586
      @chrislambaa7586 2 місяці тому +5

      True, which is why it's so important with great journalism to keep them in check or at least to some extent.

    • @gtlover2011
      @gtlover2011 2 місяці тому +15

      Fair enough. After watching the whole video, they've mentioned about the train in Laos as the "debt trap", Sao Tomé cut ties with Taiwan, emphasizing how Chinese-led FOA promote the usage of Paraquat while failed to mention how UK manufactures the exports Paraquat to where countries are allowed to use, like US and Canada. Surprise me they've mentioned the involvement of US coporates with FAO in the last minute of this video though. Conclusion: Stop the Chinese influences. Nothing really about health or starvation.

    • @NeostormXLMAX
      @NeostormXLMAX 2 місяці тому

      @@gtlover2011dw is just the german outsource of the us propaganda department

    • @robertplant2059
      @robertplant2059 2 місяці тому

      problem is as I just saw a post on chinese travelers and how they feel entitled and are extremely rude, it was asked where this arrogance comes from and it is from their Gov, they don't care about anyone but themselves. why they have no allies.

    • @GrandTerr
      @GrandTerr 2 місяці тому

      Western countries especially eu still have principles and freedom of information, which is a lot better than people without any like chinese

  • @yaosun9431
    @yaosun9431 2 місяці тому +40

    You have to talk about expertise and experience instead of nationality when talking about serving greater goods. For what I see here, DW is the one screaming greed and unreasonable bias

    • @TheBrandNewICumEverywhere
      @TheBrandNewICumEverywhere 2 місяці тому

      lol they are

    • @chrislambaa7586
      @chrislambaa7586 2 місяці тому +5

      How so are they doing that?
      Or is this just unfounded accusations?
      I have seen many of their documentary and always follow up on it with my own sources and these documentary from DW is probably some of the best journalism we have in the world. The never fail when I follow up on them, unlike many other.

    • @chrislambaa7586
      @chrislambaa7586 2 місяці тому +3

      ​@@TheBrandNewICumEverywhereChinese bot detected. If anyone want to know why, see my other comments in the other threads.

    • @yaosun9431
      @yaosun9431 2 місяці тому

      @@chrislambaa7586 Every so called facts are just ones opinion. I do respect all of them but I don't necessarily agree. Also, honest journalism present facts most, but not all the time.

    • @chrislambaa7586
      @chrislambaa7586 2 місяці тому +1

      @@yaosun9431 I find myself in an unusual situation. I both agree with you and disagree 😄
      It is true that all opinions are subjective, it's impossible for any human to be anything else.
      However I would still say that objectivity do exist and we should always strive towards that.

  • @thehunterofdeath2180
    @thehunterofdeath2180 2 місяці тому +1

    All those chemicals are killing us the human being OMG

  • @mayurmathpal7198
    @mayurmathpal7198 2 місяці тому +1

    can I add one more thing, the real reason why India says there should be reform in UNO and says no to Rice export, and India says there has been corruption done in the World Bank by China because you look at every angle how come a country can grow this fast unless they have oil

  • @asdisskagen6487
    @asdisskagen6487 2 місяці тому +20

    Henry Kissinger, who the CCP acknowledges was a "good friend" (and who many people knowledgeable of history consider a war criminal) is credited with the quote: "Who controls the food supply controls the people; Who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls the money controls the whole world." Truer words have never been spoken. Although that should be a warning, the CCP has taken that as a blueprint.

    • @MO-fl8vm
      @MO-fl8vm 2 місяці тому

      Henry Kissinger also open the worlds largest state (communist China) to the free market….

    • @alexanderg1935
      @alexanderg1935 2 місяці тому +4

      That's a truism known to nations since time immemorial. The Chinese are not children, they've practised statecraft long before most nations existed. Referencing Kissinger in this context strikes me as rather disingenuous.

    • @jianbiaogao8280
      @jianbiaogao8280 2 місяці тому

      So, an American state secretary is a war criminal and you take his words as the truth, and use this to blame China?

    • @EM-dw2yv
      @EM-dw2yv 2 місяці тому

      have you hear monzato..and bayern. basf.. they want to kill population to steal natural resources.

    • @frontline324
      @frontline324 2 місяці тому

      he is American .he served the United States

  • @guoqinggao2021
    @guoqinggao2021 2 місяці тому +9

    it is only banned in Europe, however the poor country people need to survive without starving

    • @irokpe6977
      @irokpe6977 2 місяці тому

      Well they say get rich or die trying according to one famous hip hop artiste.

    • @EurasiaOnYT
      @EurasiaOnYT 2 місяці тому +1

      Exactly!

    • @wildalentejo750
      @wildalentejo750 2 місяці тому

      They need to change farming practices.

    • @MeiinUK
      @MeiinUK 2 місяці тому

      It has been banned in Europe and in the UK because these pesticides have poisoned a lot of their citizens already... This is something that China does not know for a long time but.... It is important that they shouldn't overlook this point.... If anything this damages the reputation of china.

  • @Onionbaron
    @Onionbaron 2 місяці тому

    Cui bono? (always the question...)

  • @davidhaugen9966
    @davidhaugen9966 2 місяці тому +1

    It isn't like the European countries, or the US of A have treated the countries of Africa, Asia or S. America with great respect or brotherhood in the past.

    • @tbphillips9649
      @tbphillips9649 2 місяці тому +1

      Like they’re doing it now also

  • @Goodmaolee
    @Goodmaolee 2 місяці тому +12

    There is an old saying in China, "A dog can't spit out ivory", which means that you don't have to expect objective words from a person full of prejudice. This saying is very suitable for DW here.

    • @chaoticrealm777
      @chaoticrealm777 2 місяці тому +3

      If that's the case, then we can apply your saying to alot of things, like mainland Chinese racism towards Africans. 🙄

    • @Goodmaolee
      @Goodmaolee 2 місяці тому

      @@chaoticrealm777 Who can be more racist than the Europeans?

    • @yasuke4593
      @yasuke4593 2 місяці тому

      @@chaoticrealm777 you’re getting closer to the truth. I’m waiting for you to realize that the racism you speak of exists in Western Countries that pretend to have better values. So..now what?

  • @user-nu5mn2pu5f
    @user-nu5mn2pu5f 2 місяці тому +91

    DW never been the 2nd place when blaming China. For me I watch DW as a joke😂

  • @kaminirajput2019
    @kaminirajput2019 21 день тому

    Very informative .......

  • @teoh3564
    @teoh3564 2 місяці тому +3

    😂give others a chance to lead ❤

  • @user-xn6qf7dt2t
    @user-xn6qf7dt2t 2 місяці тому +5

    China needs this, they have to do something, they are out of food and have almost scraped the sea of all life. Food prices are rising so fast.

    • @liongjiahwong5478
      @liongjiahwong5478 2 місяці тому

      China has diverted the water from fkooding South to the North, spending 100 of billions Of YUAN. CHINA is diverting the water from Tibet, Qinghai to the Central Plain, China known in 20 years time water is very important. Any countries doing like China did.

  • @josec.londonosierra1658
    @josec.londonosierra1658 2 місяці тому +1

    Does anyone else has a plan?

    • @hthomas4993
      @hthomas4993 2 місяці тому

      I know right? where is the alternative?!

    • @donHooligan
      @donHooligan 2 місяці тому

      Community gardens and permaculture food forests everywhere.

  • @durgabahadurolichhetri7616
    @durgabahadurolichhetri7616 2 місяці тому

    In Nepal, FAO has no importance since we are losing almost all indigenous crop production systems collapse. We are turning to an importer from an exporter (a long time ago). What is the use of welcoming such an organization?

  • @MJ18888
    @MJ18888 2 місяці тому +13

    There are only over 30 developed countries in the world, and majority of them are in Europe. Personally I do not have faith that an elected official from europe will implement policies that’s good for ALL countries.

    • @chavdardonchev
      @chavdardonchev 2 місяці тому

      Says a Chinese person? How much do you get paid to comment on videos?

  • @geinikan1kan
    @geinikan1kan 2 місяці тому +7

    To be frank, the CCP love for peasants was always a stretch. The peasant in China was never more than a blank slate to be mobilized.

    • @richardyoung834
      @richardyoung834 2 місяці тому

      Slave labour

    • @richardkong4387
      @richardkong4387 2 місяці тому +2

      Have you taken your medication yet?

    • @geinikan1kan
      @geinikan1kan 2 місяці тому

      @@richardkong4387 thanks for replying.

    • @widodoakrom3938
      @widodoakrom3938 2 місяці тому +1

      Source: trust me bro

    • @geinikan1kan
      @geinikan1kan 2 місяці тому

      @@widodoakrom3938 check out the Great Leap Forward. Or the past 40 years of crazy development.

  • @finestrellacaustica
    @finestrellacaustica 2 місяці тому

    Regenerative agricolture is the way forward. Unfortunately, although being by far the best practice, it does not allow corporations to profit. So sad. ☹️

  • @parasbishnoi_029
    @parasbishnoi_029 2 місяці тому

    Please make the documentary on thar desert of Rajasthan and its Bishnoi community of Jodhpur and Bikaner district

  • @silverforest4682
    @silverforest4682 2 місяці тому +3

    This should be shown to every UN ambassador so decisoons can be made to replace Que