Peter Watts: Burn the Data to the Ground

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @TheIsioisi
    @TheIsioisi 9 років тому +16

    Didn't realise this had been recorded, always pleased to see Peter giving a piece of his mind to the masses

  • @jeffreyburdges1293
    @jeffreyburdges1293 5 місяців тому +1

    It's tricky to design a service who has the data, but could then burn it to the ground securely. We adopt end-to-end encryption so that some data never exists, but metadata protection remains technically harder. We adopted certificate transperency so that the silverbacks set off alarms when they try man-in-the-middle attacks, but maybe the NSA manages anyways.

  • @ToxicTorgo
    @ToxicTorgo 5 років тому +19

    Peter Watts is too wise for us. That’s why no one is listening. (I’m a new fan, thanks to Hambone Littletail for spreading the word. Looking forward to reading his fiction.)

  • @legionpigsmack1153
    @legionpigsmack1153 7 років тому +4

    too dark for Dostoevsky
    ...peter fucking watts

  • @DavenH
    @DavenH 5 років тому +20

    Love how brazen Watts is in speaking his damn mind, which also is well founded by scientific rigour.

  • @D1it4FN
    @D1it4FN 3 роки тому +4

    I'd like to know what Mr Watts role was in the altercation at the border. From what I've uncovered he had done nothing more than behave angelically.

  • @nixx640
    @nixx640 6 місяців тому

    I can't believe it has only 13k views by now :( Peter Watts has always like an unparalleled, underappreciated genius to me

  • @kheperainherhiding6522
    @kheperainherhiding6522 3 роки тому +7

    This man is an utter gem. We are not worthy to be in his presence.

  • @kludgedude
    @kludgedude Рік тому

    If intelligence really improved fitness more people would have it.

  • @AnakinSkyobiliviator
    @AnakinSkyobiliviator Рік тому

    Interesting talk, although I wish we could see the slides he references...

  • @blahdeblah6207
    @blahdeblah6207 4 роки тому

    Can you prove that bit at 4:35?

    • @frcrr
      @frcrr 3 роки тому +5

      What bit exactly? "We *are* mammals"? Prove that we are mammals?

  • @pk6610
    @pk6610 3 роки тому +2

    Whole talk is a scrambled mess of interesting ideas, 'shocking' observations bordering on digressions without really making any point. Also calling 3 cases a trend is a tinfoilhat thinking

    • @wrigleyextra11
      @wrigleyextra11 3 роки тому +4

      nice try CIA

    • @johnnycochicken
      @johnnycochicken 2 роки тому +2

      @@wrigleyextra11 lol

    • @waterkingdavid
      @waterkingdavid 2 роки тому

      Your comment doesn't really make any point. It's a bit of a scrambled mess.
      On the contrary the talk is a kind of collage of pictures. And each picture tells a thousand words as the saying goes.
      The talk speaks volumes. This man is not just highly intelligent but extremely insightful.

    • @FlameForgedSoul
      @FlameForgedSoul 2 роки тому +3

      Tell me his talk went over your head without telling me his talk went over your head.

    • @GeorgeTsiros
      @GeorgeTsiros Рік тому

      depends heavily on your background

  • @stoneymcmechan3210
    @stoneymcmechan3210 8 років тому +10

    A friend asked me for a birthday present - 'Echopraxia' by Peter Watts. My friend is Russian, I checked the UA-cam and found this... Now I'm just wondering: is 'Echopraxia' the dark book mentioned? ))

    • @christobalhunta
      @christobalhunta 8 років тому +11

      No, it was his Starfish novel from Rifters Trilogy. It was one of his early works before he became a well known writer. It was published in russian after the sweeping success of of "Blindsight" with russian audience. I have read "Starfish" in both english and russian. I found russian version smoother yet somewhat lacking in character. I guess that is why your friend is asking for "Echopraxia" in english as a gift.

    • @stoneymcmechan3210
      @stoneymcmechan3210 8 років тому +3

      Oh, thank you for taking your time giving such a detailed answer! I'm not that into SF, however after your response, I might read the book myself.

    • @СергейФролов-х2т
      @СергейФролов-х2т 4 роки тому +1

      it is realy fucking hard to read him in english

    • @gungrave
      @gungrave 3 роки тому

      @@СергейФролов-х2т true. Too many scientific terms which definitions contain even more complex vocabulary. I'vw read Blindsight twice and Exopraxia once, both in russian. Looking forward to reread in original