For me, this referee was a bit generous in allowing Lombardi an extra step back when pulling Mo's attack short. I thought Mo had a strong argument for reprise at 1:18 and especially at 5:23
First one I feel was correct decision by the referee, despite Lombardi taking a little long to finish the new attack, by right of way rulebook it’s Lombardi’s as he took a step back when Mo fell short and never stopped on his new attack. For the second one I agree with you, Lombardi took extra steps back, could of been considered attack/reprise by Mo.
@drewstrains3868 Yeah the second one definitely feels more like reprise right than the first one. Maybe if you're Mo's coach you'd like to see him not try that action again given how the first call went
For me, this referee was a bit generous in allowing Lombardi an extra step back when pulling Mo's attack short. I thought Mo had a strong argument for reprise at 1:18 and especially at 5:23
First one I feel was correct decision by the referee, despite Lombardi taking a little long to finish the new attack, by right of way rulebook it’s Lombardi’s as he took a step back when Mo fell short and never stopped on his new attack. For the second one I agree with you, Lombardi took extra steps back, could of been considered attack/reprise by Mo.
@drewstrains3868 Yeah the second one definitely feels more like reprise right than the first one. Maybe if you're Mo's coach you'd like to see him not try that action again given how the first call went