Dhruv Rathee's Analysis Of ANIMAL Is SENSELESS & Here's The Proof
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 лют 2025
- #dhruvrathee #animal #review
Here's what I think about Dhruv Rathee's analysis of the film ANIMAL.
IG: / shan_prasher
Everything wrong in ANIMAL - • ANIMAL Glorifies TOXIC...
Coming from a Dhruv rathee subscriber, this is a well researched and unbaised reply... Well done Shan..
Bow Bow gang !!
@@purpleblackberries6850 Not all films are made as reflection of society😂. Films take huggggge creative liberty thus making them fictious. Sabse ameer aadmi ko goli lage na toh Desh ki saree police udhar lg jaygi, aur poore film mein ek bhi police nhi hai, 1 of the many facts that prove this film is nowhere reflection of society
I have seen both videos , and both are biased. Both have done well researched and point out their Targeted portion.
Dhruv Pick up Munnu and went through his oife time journey, he didn't say that munnu watch this film
But he said munnu face some similar incidents in his child life then as a adult he watch this film , that create an impact on his mind.
Yes some people don't influence but some people influence by elvish yadav as well.
Shan can't guarantee that no one influenced by ANIMAL.
Dhruv Rathi's narrative was more right because he also said that
Some people only may influence but it create a big impact as a part of domino effect,
If 10cr people will watch the movie and 0.0025% people influenced then the number is 2500
Out of them 10% will start crime then it's 250 criminals.
So both are right in their opinion
Shan is talking about remain 9.999 cr
Dhruv is talking about that 2500
Dhruv should say something on
Toxic feminism movies/series like
4 more shots
Tnx for coming
dear zindagi
Made in haven
jee karda
lipstick under
virgin vanupria
bobby begum
You should be ashamed of your existence for subscribing to one of the delutarded youtubers. Shame...shame ....shame
Edit: Add some value to your life by doing something useful
Since i saw dhruvs video, i knew his opinion was one sided and biased but the way u broke down his narrative and psychology behind is very detailed. Well done!
Same here
Dhruv rathee is a beta male. His gf probly seeks other men for satisfaction and is with the German leprosy patient only for money.
I live in his district in Haryana. Almost everyone knows here that Dhruv Rathee's mother is a red light district worker.
If anyone wants I can prove it by providing her services.
Since rathee got famous, her rates have gone up.
Damn true!! Dhruv needs to watch this
Not just movie reviews all the videos related politics also highly biased,
@@bullishboi u meant biased?
-Wife and kid left him
- Father is about to die
- Almost half of bones in his body are broken
- A psycho is after him to Butcher his family
Without being sympathetic vanga is shown how every action has consequences. He didn't justify any of his act.
Absolutely. Great points.
Yes but there are people who r defending the character. They are soo ignorant about the fact that Ranbir character is problematic. It's the audience that are defending the characters and those who are pointing out the wrong things that shown in the movie are said that they are fake feminist. Seriously people need to grow up
@@shreyaranjan400non of this feminist shows this point that bro share they actually called Sandeep vanga biggot mysoginy or woman abuser that's why they are feminist God just forgot to give brain to them 😂😂
But the character of Vijay didn't have any redemption arc despite suffering the consequences. That's why it's wrong. Because, the movie glorifies it.
Exactly....nd same was with kabir singh...reddy very cleverly shows that his charatrs have flaws nd because of these flaws his charactrs face terrible consequences...in kabir singh literally his license was revoked in the end...people just dont get this
The biggest answer is Sandeep Reddy Vanga answered every single critic except Dhruv Rathee. He didn't even bother to answer him.
I wish Dhruv could make a similar video about the toxicity in series and movies like 'Thank you for coming' and 'Four more shots' but we all know he won't since it doesn't fit on his political ideology
Yes
@@Let_me_cook31woh isliye hit nhi hui kyunki un series ki koi story hi nhi hai.
@@Let_me_cook31 n there u went wrong. Boys knows the animal character where he is wrong or right. Jaise Neha dhupia ki baat me akalmand ladkiya agree nhi kra tha to yaha ladke galat ko promote nhi kr rhe they just enjoying the mass action, stylish movie n coolness that's it. I'm being a girl, a wife too ,loved this movie. Jahan galat laga wo galat laga jahan accha lga wo accha laga. That's it finished kuch nhi uske baad. Baat itna bhadhana kyu. Film dekh liya bs utna hi uspe itna sochna kyu. Ab jo jayda sochega wo insaan hi problematic hai. Usse har dusre teesre film me influence hona hoga.
@@Let_me_cook31log logically sahi aur galat me frk jaante h, sbko pta h murder, khoon khraaba glt h. To kyu gyaan chodna
I don't think anybody even watches this shit shows n movies..
Dhruv bhai is absolutrely right I watched Cars movie as a kid and now I'm a car vroom vroom !!!
😂
😂😂😂😂
😂😂
😂😂😂
I'm also influenced by Stuart little, now I'm a mouse😢
Just imagine Animal starts streaming on Netflix and Netflix calls Dhruv to review the Film.
Oops 🫢
Moi moi ho jayega
he will promote it... he is such kind of shameless
It is on Netflix now
He'll reject it any of cost❤️🔥
But I'm disagree with that point says films don't change society. These things happen gradually so you can't see but if you analysis you can see
Really film doesn't change the society, agr aisa hota to money heist dekhkr sb chori krne lgte , Spiderman dekhkr sab building se kudte.. pr logo ko reality pta hoti h kya Krna h ky nhi.m wo just entertainment ka jariya h
bhai agar society change ho jaati movies se then koi bhi student suicide nhi karta chhichore, 3 idiots dekhne ke baad
@@2kdwalapro254 logo ne chori ki hai dude money heist se inspiration leke. Check your facts
@@Anmoluserhow do you know ki kitne logo ne apna de decesion change kar diya. Will they come out and say ki I watched 3 idiots and it changed my decision of not taking my life? Dude these things happens on personal level
@@iklokesh bro mere kehne ka mtlb tha ki agar movies se inspire log hone lagte toh chhichore jaisi movies dekhne ke baad at least suicide rate kam toh hota but last year hi dekh lo aur ek baat batao koi bilkul seedha saadha insaan movie dekh ke gangster ban sakta hai kya??? nhi na sirf wahi log criminal ban sakte hai movies dekh ke jinki thought process hi criminals ki tarah hai jis insaan ki soch criminal ki tarah hai woh kisi bhi cheez se inspire hoke crime kar sakta hai tum jo chori ka bata rhe ho money heist se toh jin logon ne chori ki unke dimaag mei hi chori karne waali baatein ghumti rehti hongi uss series se toh unhe push mila tha aur aisa push kahin se bhi mil sakta hai newspapers se, articles se, novels se toh kya inn sab ko bhi band karwa de???
Absolutely logical and a good reply to his hypocrite and one sided narrative
lol from begining he always gives onesided narrative only...Dhruv rathi is like a 'baba' for todays kids living in gated societies.
He dresses in modern clothing and gives an illusion to its listeners of being part of some 'factual crowd'.....and 'different than rest of population'.
Bhai yeh bh0s@riwa@la bhi uski friendly gang mein hi hain😂😂, isko pro-hindu stance se jo popularity mili, usko encash karna chahta hain
as if Shan didn't make a one-sided biased review in the first place.
@@malehachowdhury5614 difference is ppl who watch Shan's video arent like Dhruv's cult.....where they treat every word spoken by their 'messiah of facts'...as ultimate truth
Logical nhi
Logical fallacy 😂
Dhruv Rathee always does this "half truth" videos. Thank you for exposing him.
🤡🤡🤡🤡
Correct
truth is nothing but perspective.
@@The_coding111Aah look darbaari andhnamazis are seething here already 😂😂
@@ammygaming2817nope. Truth is truth. Perspective changes the perception of the truth, but it remains what it is.
Dhruv Rathee is the same Guy who Loved BREAKING BAD. 🤡
He loves gangs of wasseypur too
@@suhaib5941 then comparing Animal to Toxicity is also a biggest Joke.
Breaking bad n gangs of wassepur movie is not glorifies lead character at all.
@@atheist1586 LOL really dude ? The BGM was playing Jeeya ho bihar ke lala when Manoj bajpai character was dying in Part 1. Also in Breaking Bad, they turned skyler into a hated wife character to make the fans side with Walter and then they turned Jesse Pinkman into babyface to turn him into a villain. Full Glorification
@@atheist1586 Abe chutiye kuch toh sense bana le aapne baaton ki
I am not a Dhruv Rathee supporter, but I feel Shan, it’s very important to point out here, that I’m gangs of Wasseypur or sacred games, there is no visual grammar of glorification, which is present in animal. I felt that the visual grammar of animal, be it background music or writing, it’s very important to note that there is no redemption arc, there is no morality, and I felt very uncomfortable when people in the theatre are whistling and shouting for the abusive scenes.
yes..but Anurag kashyap himself has praised Sandeep Vanga & Animal recently,even calling Sandeep a "mis-understood" director..🤣🤣😂
@soultune908 💯 😂
You need to become strong that's all I would say. People laugh on Men Abuse jokes too. That time did u think all those ?? It's a movie and people were supposed to react like that. Then according to you, Dark humour shouldn't exist.
I agree , they were doing something wrong , they were the anti hero , we do support them , but in our minds we know they made some bad decision, some terrible circumstances, thing go wrong
But in case of animal , all of this is shown as giga chad behaviour
@KratosMessi-eo1yl dude. I’m talking about glorifying domestic violence. He’s literally abusing his wife, and people in the theatre are clapping and cheering. Is this a representation of masculinity?!
Sadly Dhruv's Video has 8 million views and this video will hardly get a few 100 thousand views.. we need to push such videos highlighting bias and hypocrisy of so called influencers like Dhruv Rathee
so true share it on reels part wise it has wider reach every one
So true...pathan acchi nhi thi
Bs usse itna support iss liye mila kyuki usme srk tha aur wo M u s... h
If ajay,or akshay would hv been the lead in that movie
phir yahi dhruv jaise uska mzak bnate
I don't agree with Prateek Borade's views nor do I agree with Dhruv Rathee.. both are very polarizing.. Be on a neutral ground guys
I m sure most of his followers are just purchased bots lol
Some mad guy made a stupid movie and i see people fighting between each other for that movie. This samosa youtuber made a video just as an answer to another fellow UA-camr. Shame on you. Dhruv rathe doesnot care, he doesn’t have time to answer to this cheap people
Films don't influence a society; the society influences films. A film is a reflection of the society. One can choose to moan over the bad reflection or not even look at it. But the image remains whether you wish to accept it or not.
Films can never change the moral values of a person as they depend on his/her upbringing and education. I've watched countless films with extremely problematic lead characters but I've never even thought of copying them. I see them as troubled individuals that need help. They serve as a reminder of what not to become in life.
If someone becomes morally corrupt just by watching a few films, there is a serious issue with the individual's upbringing, social circle or education.
If films had such a huge influence on people, why haven't most people embraced progressive agendas and revolutionary ideas?
Critics shouldn't burden films with their own morality. A film can be whatever it's maker wants it to be.
Spoken like a True Nationalist
Jai Siya Ram
Most logical person here. Kudos to you man🙏
Its both ways...you must have heard ,criminals doing crime ..inspired by movie scene..
Just get a research on how many drisyam model crimes were reported in last few years😐
miya gaalib aapko milte hai 8/10 essay writing mai
there is a study which shows how after Kabir Singh smoking habits increased in youth in India, yes movies change the way people behave
in country like India where youth worship the hero,
Mention the study?
could you cite the study? where can we have a look?
Dhruv Rathee clearly stated violence and evil characters should be shown in a particular way and not in a heroic way. There is no redemption in Animal movie or Kabir Singh, they remain hero till the end which is why it makes it toxic. Dirty picture is dirty too but Vidya balan is not shown in a good light. No body will be inspired by what she played on screen bcoz the grey lines was reflected subtly through the movie.So good and evil characters need to have it's own consequences. We should not glamorize toxic characters that's what Dhruv said.
have you even seen those 2 movies, if yes then i can't say anything coz you're dumb. and dont watch something which you cant digest
In gangs of wasseypur, sardar Khan and Faisal are shown in a heroic way. Thousands of reels copied from their dialogue
@@Raj14-o9y but by the end, they suffer due to this attitude and actions as well. Sardar Khan dies, Faizal Khan cried in a scene saying" I never wanted to get involved in this" and was killed by his own step brother. Nagma was killed, Durga betrayed Sardar. Ramadhir was killed by Faizal. They all suffered in the end
@@Mkeyline_112 I see reels on disgusting dialogues from mirzapur
@@Mkeyline_112 Didn't Ranvijay Singh suffer in the end? His whole body got damaged. His sense of taste/smell vanished. His sister is widow now. 2 of his brothers got killed by Aziz. His wife left him. His dad jiske liye vo itna pagal tha, pata chalta hai he is diagnosed with cancer and only few months are left until he is dead. His whole family has been destroyed. To add more to that, there is Aziz now who has cloned Ranvijay's face and now burning in fire of revenge and is ready to destory his whole lineage and wants to capture Swastik Enterprises. He used to feel bad about his father not giving enough time to him. But eventually vo bhi aisa hi baap ban gaya hai end me jo apni family ko zara sa bhi time nahi de raha hai. Itna suffer karna kaafi nahi hai tunhare liye.
Dhruv Rathee may be wrong but the movie Animal is utterly illogical and what’s more concerning than the movie is that the character of Ranbir is being celebrated among youth who will go to any limits to defend and justify the actions of the senseless character.
you have still not understood the movie and what it wants to show
Yes, & gamers who play GTA becomes Salmon Khan on roads
"Ranbir is being celebrated among youth who will go to any limits to defend and justify the actions of the senseless character" that may be true, but this does not make the film itself toxic. I can paint the most beautiful girl in the world, but if a guy jacks off to that painting its not my art that at fault, it's the perception of my art in the mind of a backwards audience.
Animal is made for mature audiences, and it should be judged that way. If the general Indian audience watches 'taxi driver' and tries to kill people to fix the world, that is not the movies fault, it is the audience that lacks maturity. Anything illogical in this movie also exists in many other Bollywood movies, but specifically nit picking this movie for those points because you disagree with the impact it's making is deceptive.
Instead of telling sensible people to not watch this movie, maybe there should be an effort to teach people what to actually conclude from this movie....Not to behave like an Animal, that is Ranbir Kapoor in this movie.
@@1596bin I’m not nit picking Animal at all. Most of the recent Bollywood movies are subpar in terms of logic, Animal being the worst. And let’s not compare Taxi Driver, a cult classic, with this “cringe fest”. I respect your opinion- you liked Animal. But I didn’t. Let’s just leave it at that.
@@ashishbehera1150 That is true...you have as much right to dislike this movie as I have to like it
Also just to clarify, I was not trying to compare Taxi driver as a film to Animal, but the idea of how it's about a frustrated man that resorts to violence. And in the eyes of a wrong audience this can also create a toxic response.
But yes, agree to disagree about the movie 👍
Bhai ... You can't take manoj 's statement just for the sake of proving your point... Films do have impact on the society.. A single film called KANTARA changed the life of Daiva nartakas in Karanataka... Now Govt. Giving them financial aid the perishing art form got new life after Kantara hit.
Accha , tu mangalyaan movie dekhne ke baad sare log scientist kyu nahi ban gaye?
Movies do not influence society, society influences movies
@@mithileshchakravarty3883 if you are not inspired from Mangalyaan doesn't mean that nobody else has ..... Becoming scientist is not preparing 2 min. Maggie...
At the same time, I am not denying that, films are a reflection of the society... Both visa versa is right only.
@@vhpnow likewise becoming a criminal is also not a task of 2 mins
@@mithileshchakravarty3883 haha.. Becoming criminal is not good for society in the first place...
Very logical and sensible reply, my respect for Shan is 10x now for calling dhruv on such a gaslighting video
Dhruv rathee is a beta male. His gf probly seeks other men for satisfaction and is with the German leprosy patient only for money.
I live in his district in Haryana. Almost everyone knows here that Dhruv Rathee's mother is a red light district worker.
If anyone wants I can prove it by providing her services.
Since rathee got famous, her rates have gone up.
Well, 0*100 = 0
Just say you love bjp we can clearly understand your emotions 😊
We live in an era where Munnu can watch BDSM porn in 4K UHD resolution. This film is peanut compared to that. Needless to say Germany, The Netherlands was porn capital once upon a time.
At the End, nowadays 18+ Indian viewers are smart enough to understand what to see and what to consume !! 🙂
Really😅😮😮😮
Not everyone but some are
@@MoinKhan-uf4pgI think the general population is sane enough to know what's reality and what's fiction.
Thats why dhruv tatti is viewd by so many
@@MoinKhan-uf4pgyou might not be , but most of us are
Ab aayenge "that's why education is important" wale 🤣🤣
That's why education is important 😌
I don't agree with the point that films don't change a society or don't have an impact on a society. If that would have been the case then govt. would not have been hellbent in censoring certain movies.
Mene movie me ra*e scene dekh kar ek ladki ka ra*e kar Diya bhi ab movie ke diractor ko fanshi de do
I agree with you. Films play a major role in shaping the society.
Especially the Indian society, we Indians are movie obsessed people, star obsessed people. Youngsters blindly follow their movie idols. We watch so many movies that they leave a subconscious effect on us, ppl r just too ignorant to accept it. They r talking about active and immediate effects which is a rare case of course, but not talking about the long run effect on psychology.
@@madhu6462 yes, and Dhruv Rathee has explained the long term effects of such movies in his video.
@@adrijaganguly858 but promote other same kind of movies, what is logic here?
In the end, there is no cure for CRINGE........but some people don't understand that GOW is a well-made film and Animal is CRINGE!!!!
Does it matter, people don't go to movies to watch well-made films, they go to enjoy. Fight scene were cool, Tripti was looking sexy, songs were good. Acting performance were top norch, not all but many comedic punches were landed.
If any sensible or logical person watches SRV movies, you know the main character is always the real villain of the story. I was more scared of RANVIJAY than ABRAR in ANIMAL
Exactly! Idk how were people not able to see this in the movie, Ranvijay was literally screaming through the screen that he's problematic.
That's why this movie name is "Animal"
What dhruv said is actually true and I support him because i watched power rangers and now i am red ranger❤😎
Ha ha 😅😂
Why not white ranger , he was op
@@vivekkparashar White ranger of dino thunder was my fav 😁
ABE SALE😂
Good One😂
Bro destroyed German Shepherd single handedly😂
Lol 😂
Right
Andhbhakt making their own happiness 😂😂😂
@@shahanali5706 And Andhnamazi (Pappu bhakt) are sad as always 😂😂😂😂
Dhruv was saying ki movies aesi banni chahiye ki jisne violence ko glamorise na Kiya jaaye , he meant ki Jo khoon karaba kar Raha hai use galat dikhana chahiye, jo women par control karta hai, use galat dikhana chahiye, but animal me aesa karne Wale ko hero dikhaya gya hai, tum logo ko samajh aana chahiye ki the message that he gave while criticising animal were all correct,
Agreed. He was sure to make this point. That movies can be violent but they shouldn't be glorified
Bhai ambani tumhe car she udda me chala jayega to tumhe justice milega? Esha sochna bhi joke hai 😂
Logo ko false hope kiyu de?
I had exactly the same feeling while watching his video. I feel that, just like us, he has the right to express his opinion, but not at the cost of looking down on others. If you didn't like the movie, that's fine; you can come out and put your opinion, but when you are doing it with ill intentions, that's when your opinion turns into propaganda.
He's just using his audience into believing ki Jo vo sochta h Jo uske opinions hain waise hi sbke hone chahiye!!! That's how he keeps manipulating each and every subscriber
Money over openion
not dhruve rathee it's dhruve ghandhi
This guy used all different narratives to counter and is very different to what Dhruv said. His viewers should be smart to understand what I am saying.
Most of his videos are propaganda.
100 % logic video. Well done shan. Dhruv can't defend this logical video 😅
Isiliye uske "education is important" wale bots ni h yha😂
@@thelonewarrior1849 Bhai yahi mai kehne bale tha sale uske bots khud to gwaar hote hai orr Bolte hai education is important
Chutiya
@@thelonewarrior1849 😂😂
Art in its purest form will always be about the expressionist (expressing what the artist wants to say) rather than the communicator (focusing on the concerns of the viewer). Hope this settles pretty much every debate regarding this movie.
That is so fucking on point!!
Very aptly said.
Acha
Then why did Shan prasher do randi rona when thank you for coming, four more shots, gehraiyan released ?
They are also art
7 millions views hai.. Dekh k grow to kar rahe ho... But jo German shepherd ko expose karte hai.. Unko 100k viewers only... Why?? Share truth..
Sahi to kaha Dhruv on ANIMAL movie.
Atleast there was someone who talked against the movie. Aap bhi support karo on this instead of finding unecessary faults and targeting him.
Agreed
This is the way to call out Dhruv’s personal biased opinion. And psychological terms are on point 👏🏼 I don’t think anyone else could have made a better video on replying Dhruv rathee 🔥🔥
This random UA-camr's views is less than 10% of dhruv rathee video liked.😂😂😂
@@SilvioDante-qg7dc yeah his audience can't even take truth ,they are just crybabies thinking that they are educated from that manipulator
@@SilvioDante-qg7dc But that won't change the fact that Shan gave all logical explanations & exposed Dhruv's biased opinion lol 😂
@@SilvioDante-qg7dc popularity he has is for knowledgable content about history science and politics.he is not a movie reviewer .dhruv said gangs of wasseypur as clut movie....and now he has algery with voilence and animal is cancer..he just made the vedio cuz Animal is the hot topic and everyone is watching it and he seek opportunity for more views and more subscriber. but he forget about his past vedios bullshit.
@@Dipaaceacha hua gow money heist sacred games ki video netflix pe padi hai warna german shepard apne purane kartut chupane me mahir hai
This is the response i was expecting when i watched dhruv videos .....hats off man you did this very tastefully👑
Same
Yes bro
For you all if you think movies doesn't effect our society so listen When I watched Padman I started to talk about periods and When I watched Mission Mangal I got motivated for space science and result Now I am here in IISC Bangalore to pursue my bachelor in Physics major.
Then ur easy to manipulate.
Wow , had no idea it was so easy to manipulate you. God forbid tomorrow a movie comes out on t€rrori$m...
@@tech_report_0868 I don't know what I should write to you all . But sometimes I feel it's not your fault because your family never teach you how to control the content you watch. I think they never had any parental control on you. That's why you came to support such a toxic and violent movie
@@Yashyadav-ib3he Another BS comment when you can't refute the point. Haven't even watched Animal. Also , maybe your parents should've taught you self control and critical thinking capabilities , well , you could've developed these yourself if your parents would've provided some autonomy in your life , which definitely doesn't seem the case as you can be so easily manipulated. Classic case of controlling parents. Don't blame them though, it could be generational trauma too , who knows , maybe they got manipulated into doing something wrong too considering how easily manipulative you are. Oh , "Parents never controlled what you watch" , yes , unlike your parents when I reached a certain age , they decided to stop controlling the content that I watch , because my parents TRUST me. Maybe try instilling a sense of trust in your parents , they'd probably stop controlling you & your content too.
@@tech_report_0868 It's possible but it depends on me if I am going to watch that or not . Because I really respect my mind, it is not dustbin to fill negative thoughts
People who defending animal saying its just a movie should have kept their mouth shut while they were trying to boycott PK and padmawati movie. If you saying movie hei kuch bhi chalega then you should keep that mindset for all movie, not just selective movies 😂, isse 1000x accha hei sam bahadur.
Kya hai Sam bahadur mein 😂😂😂... average and non toxic films are not masterpieces
Animal is totally worth the ticket price and I go to multiplex to be entertained and engaged nd not learn social values😂😂
wrong is wrong. No excuses. Can you expect such animal characters in your home. Movies are a mirror of society. So mirrors should be be clean.
Clean the society, the mirror shows what's standing before it🤷
Manoj Sir once said that, we as people / audience can’t dictate whether such a film should be made or not. Censor board is there for that part. And if you don’t like “such” films, don’t go and watch it. Simple. An artist doesn’t owe anything to the society, to public. And it’s not an artist’s job to give “message” in his/ her work. Rajamouli sir once said that his job is to ENTERTAIN public, and not to PREACH them.
What is the role movie critics, will you define it
@@philfact10MDhruv is not a movie critic. He keeps poking his nose everywhere and this time he put his foot on the wrong ground.
not dhruve rathee it's dhruve ghandhi
@@philfact10Mnothing, it's a made up profession for unemployed people watching movies all the time
@@shishirtrivedi3668 If movie stories is nonsense ( nothing )
Why not critics will criticise.
Critics or criticism writers are much more relavent than story less filmmakers.
After watching Rathi ji ka video I was judging myself 😂😂 I was like something is wrong with me but thanks to you I feel relieved
Tu khud chutiye hai kyoki tu dusre par bharosa karta hai😅
We are the same bro 😂
Shame on u no wonder our india is filled with pappus and andbhakts use ur brain
Andhbhakt hai kya tu jo Germany shepherd ka propaganda dekhta hai uska logic aur Gyan WhatsApp University se milta hai tu khud se research Kiya kr 😂🤣🤣
To all the men here, if u don't find animal movie toxic, then u r that Ranvijay. To all the women here, if u found Ranvijay isn't toxic, the sisters u actually deserve a partner like ranvijay.
P.s. - showing a toxic character isn't bad. Showing violence in a movie isn't bad. Coz violence actually occurs in the society, nd there are so many toxic people in our society. But glorifying toxicity nd violence is dangerous. I watched a very violent movie once named Raman Raghav 2.0. so much violence were in that movie. But those toxic characters nd their mistakes were not glorified in tgat movie like Kabir Singh nd Animal. I'll support Dhruv Rathee in yhis case though I'm a big fan of both Shan nd Dhruv. Nd this is my personal opinion. Nd one more thing, I'm against the toxic feminist movies like thank you for coming.
It has everything u expect from commercial A rated action film..not some sermon delivered by Sadhguru or any baba promoting toxicity
@@AshishPrasad-u6y bro, commercial movies affects common people also. Do u remember, after releasing Kabir Singh some teen girls were like "I also want a bf like Kabir Singh.". A teen age boy/ girl doesn't have much knowledge about life like us. They have different fantasy. It's all about psychological thing. Some people are influenced by these types of movies bro. Plz try to understand this. Plz don't support the movies which glorify being toxic. No matter what gender that character is. Alia Character from gully boy was toxic. But still that character was glorified nd that's a toxic thing. Few girls might be influenced by that character. Who knows. Just imagine have gf like Alia Bhatt's character in gully boy. Ur life will be hell. I hope now u understand what I said. Vanga doesn't give a damn about how many people gonna influenced by his toxic movies like Kabir Singh nd animal as he's making a big amount of money by selling those so called alpha male Characters. But it's our duty not to glorify nd not to influenced by them. Goodnight bro .
Kabir literally said at the end that he would give up all bad habits. He redeemed himself and hence deserved his happy ending. Ranvijay did not die but the most precious thing, his father, got taken away from him. Dying doesn't wash away your sins. There is no glorification here, unless you want the typical hero-giving-speech-at-the-end thing. That would be too boring and cliched.
@@DuduBubuToxic u r influenced. Congrats 👏🎉
@@Sarma.k_123 Thanks, and as a return gift, you should be forced to watch A Serbian film. Best movie for the likes of you who don't have an ounce of understanding of cinema but call someone "influenced" while herself being influenced by German shepherd.
When dhruv released that video, I truly self questioned my own choice of liking Animal movie. I was thinking, is my mentality going downwards? Do I like crime?
Thanks to Shan bhai for making this video and making me believe that no matter what anyone says or want to force any narrative on me, I wouldn't get underneath next time of anyone.
I'll honestly question everything and then make choice of own for liking or not.
Shoutout to Shan bhai❤❤
If manipulating is an art, then Dhruv is Picasso of it
@@loveyourself-n6y you correctly said.
@@suhaib5941 look we make our opinions based on our surroundings, childhood, and then what we see, what we read so if dhruv will counter all points of this video with the valid reasons, I'll accept it happily.
@@bigbull004dhruv to biased hai par animal hai to mediocre movie. Devesh Dixit k comedy roast dekhna animal ka.
@@bigbull004so no use of your brain , good .
This is the bestest video of yours till date.. brilliantly explained..
That's like an educated boy, with no fake narrative and propoganda..full support to you shan brother..👍
Exactly bro...He has always surpassed himself ❤..
Shan Prasher Aapne toh Dhruv ko attack kiya. How did you prove that Animal itself is not a cancer movie? You achieved basically nothing with this dumb video. Sure, you’ve called out Dhruv. But you haven’t yet established that this movie is not cancer.
Prove that this movie is good for society, not a cancer, then you’ll be worth time. Otherwise you’re just trying really hard to sound smart.
@@msredcurtains Abe chomu usne kabhi nahi bola yeh movie good hai society keliye aur dusri baat tere jaise kamzor mindset wale itna hi influence ho jaate hai toh movies dekhna chod de tu phir jitne dhruv rathee ne acha review diya ganga of wasseypur sacred games jaisi woh konsa good hai society
@@thegameking3931 so are you a disrespectful person inherently or did you get influenced by these movies to be disrespectful? Neither should make you proud. Chomu it seems, speak for yourself bro.
@@msredcurtains Abe chomu sabko apne tarah samjha hai kya tune Jo koi bhi movies dekhe influence ho jaata hai itna bada gawar nahi hu shyad tere surrounding ke honge aur tu movies dekhna chod de Indian movies se influence hojayega toh Hollywood movies tujhe dekhne bhi nahi chahiye. Jaha baat influence ki toh meine Indian movies dekhi bhi nahi hai 2 3 saal se toh tere point invalid hai aur tujhe kyu lagta movie dekhna kuch proud jaisa hai gochu chomu tu hai aur rahega
I watched animal and being a thriller,action and gore movies fan and being a woman Dhruv’s video made me feel bad… thank you Shan for calling this out
Indeed, and Animal movie was not glorifying anything...
Ranbir's character lost almost everything in his life and his actions led to the rise of his psychotic double
Shan Prasher ji. Aapne toh Dhruv ko attack kiya. How did you prove that Animal itself is not a cancer movie? You achieved basically nothing with this dumb video. Sure, you’ve called out Dhruv. But you haven’t yet established that this movie is not cancer. Lagatar dumb videos aa rahi hain from you.
If I said, you keep posting these body building photos even though you would never qualify as a professional body builder. Does that help to negate your dumb argument? No. So however Dhruv has presented his video, his argument is that the movie is cancer.
You’re attacking his presentation and past videos, but you haven’t been able to make any negating statement about his argument itself yet.
Prove that this movie is good for society, not a cancer, then you’ll be worth time.
Even though Dhruv’s video is not perfect, you’ve got nothing on him. Screaming loud on the screen doesn’t make you smart sorry.
The problem with dhruv is he is misinterpreting facts...he is comparing rapists and misogynistic people with the one who watch these cult classic films...one of dhruv rathee viewers was female and dhruv rathee made her believe that all people in that theatre who are wooing and cheering are the one who likes to rape Or like to do extreme misogyny
Animal movie Toxic hai q k violence glorified hai aur GOW is not glorifying violence on top climax mein yeh bhi bataya Jata hai violence k anjaan kia hai . But movies like Animal, KGF are giving rise to anti heroism
On top Manoj sir has said that movies don't change society but changes your style.. you see jaab har bande ka style change hojayga then one day society will start accepting bad things as norm..
I am not saying all movies are bad but ek time ta jaab bade Kuch kehtete then we use to respect it but this days har Banda Apne mein ek hero hai.. from where they this attitude..
Isliye bolta hu world cinema dekha karo ye garbage Indian cinema dekhkar tumahri soch bhi bhut choti ho gayi h
Bollywood 70s se aurat ko bikni m dikha raha tumhre mulle dada log mast dekhte aa rhe the
@@slayer_142 could you explain your POV..?
Nobody responded to you or anyone about a movie review , but you proved him right that fans of these movies are toxic .
Tumhare logic se to dhruv rathee ko bhi animal ke against video nahi banani chahiye thi, animal ne kya German shepherd ko personally Target Kiya tha?😂 Flawed logic
@@mithileshchakravarty3883animal movie hai uspe koi bhi comment kar sakta hai......
But dhruv is just a you tuber.
Shan made content about dhruv not on animal 😂😂😂😂
U are absolutely correct…Dont know how UA-camrs can take fat cheques and so blatantly lie to the audience who give them their livelihood.. he should be shown that audience have brains and cannot be manipulated..
He may have called out some points in Dhruv’s video, but to negate Dhruv’s argument, he would need to prove that animal is not a cancer for society, but in fact good for society. He hasn’t been able to prove that, nor establish that, and just keeps rambling on like an idiot. 🤐
@@msredcurtains Animal is not cancer for society, you are accountable for what you do not the movie makers. It has been marketed in a way that alerts people to keep their children away from this movie. And stop spamming everywhere lil bro
@@Dover55 sure responsibility should be on an individual rather than a collective, because humans are not social beings. You are so right. Next to shock audience, if filmmakers start putting out snuff films, that would be okay too. Creative liberty and individual responsibility and all. You make such good points.
Bro, in animal, violence is highly glorified, but in gangs of wasseypur, the violence is subjective, and not glorified, thats what dhruv was saying
Do you seriously believe that these people will get that?
He never said that neither trying to do this ,the video is criticising his hypocrisy how he promoted movies containing violence in past plus his analysis of movie isn't right he called fans toxic because they like animal.makes no sense
@@sanyamtomar8181for sure these people will get that
Then why He promoted Death note
@@madts243 Cause in the end Light gets what he deserved. But in Animal the animal gets away with everything and has a happy ending.
Nailed it, brother. This video demonstrates that criticism and disagreement can coexist with respect. Regards from Adelaide, Australia 🇦🇺
He may have called out Dhruv’s video, but to negate Dhruv’s argument, he would need to prove that animal is not a cancer for society, but in fact good for society. He hasn’t been able to establish that, and just keeps rambling on like an idiot.
@@msredcurtains problem is hypocrisy of druv rathee and his fans like you.On one side he promotes gow, breaking bad and sacred games and then he criticize animal,why different criteria according to movies?And yes this youtuber Shan Prasher also criticize negative aspects of animal and appreciate positive aspects also,but the way druv calls rapist to fans of gore, slasher,action genre movies is pure hypocrisy, it's everyone personal choice to see and love movies .You can't judge the character of person by choices of movie.And yes I also criticize negative aspects of animal but degrading the whole movie for your own judgement is definitely not acceptable,and yes if you have valid counter argument then reply me I will definitely reply you. 5:24 5:24
@@msredcurtainswhy he should prove anything he is not calling animal great social changer movie
Dhruv rathee should prove that just like animal gangs of wassepur sacred games breaking bad etc are not a cancer to society
Whoever pays him money then that movie is great
& when he is not paid for review that movie becomes cancer for the society
You are so dumb you didnt get the gist of the whole video
Its about hypocrisy
@@msredcurtains Least Retarded dhruv rathee fan
@@aryagaonkar2161i agree to some of shans point but shan also misrepresented few of the things, when he tryna expose dhruv hypocrisy like misrepresentation of death note anime
There is a difference between portrayal of violence in Anurag Kashyap films and Sandeep's films. Anurag depicts it while Sandeep celebrates it. There is crude violence and then there is sensational violence. I have childhood friends who never got the privilege of getting good education, when you hear their opinion and see how they idolize Ranbir's character, you'll get to know where the problem lies and why Dhruv's arguments are logical to a great extent.
And you can only blame the director in this context because if not everyone, people are going to idolize a person who "Protects his family" at any cost, rides a private jet and fires machine guns. Not everyone has the intellectual ability to maturely understand problematic plots. They end up subscribing to a wrong ideology which will reflect in their actions at micro levels.
Rightly said. Animal is glorifying the crime.
@@Krishngaminglive I have, he is absolutely right. You are 'fools' for not understanding the difference between these movies. Anurag's movies show the reality and never promotes violence. As the writer of this comment rightly said violence isn't celebrated in his movies. Where as in animal violence has been glorified.
animal ne kese violence ko celeberate kiya hai jara batayenge aap
@@marcosurvivalist7266 Remember the machine gun scene background music? Remember the scene where Ranbir walks out naked? It celebrates violence the same way few punjabi songs promote gun violence. The difference is subtle yet polarizes viewers so much so that they start taking offence when something is said against the film.
No, shan you didn't call out animal with equal intensity as you have called out thank you for coming and other films.
You justified ranbir's character by saying that he was saving his sister . But you didn't realise he brought a gun in college and even fired it.
Right
@@mariapauline8732 because acc to him only toxic feminism based movies affects society not toxic masculinity movies ? bro literally mai 18 19 saal ke bacho ko padhata bhi hoon unhone jab kaha ki achi film toh hai sir Ill tell them ask me same question after some years and as a teacher I admire professor vikas divyakirti sir who said "films like animal take our society 10 years back"
@@HimanshuRanjan-zb2rv very true, in the end if they showed that Ranbir is bad n he learnt lesson what he did he is not right then still I can accept but showing a man should be like this, it effects the boys mentality
Cigarette peena..cancer ko promote karna hai. 🤡
This line is enough to know the level of Intellect Dhruv has about movies.
Watched the movie a couple of days ago and I just can't fathom why some people are bashing it for no reason. I loved it SO MUCH. Brilliantly written and executed story about an unhinged main character. It doesn't justify ANYTHING from Ranvijay's character and all of his negative actions have some ramifications or consequences. Geetanjali's brilliant monologue calling him out for his toxic behaviours and her slapping Ranvijay multiple times made it absolutely perfect and showed that the script is not glorifying any of his actions.
massive taste issue
Brilliantly written story???
to deem this narrative as brilliantly crafted and executed seems incredulous.
Thank you shan Bhai. It's needed he always gives byest reviews. Thank you for call out karne ke liye. Keep Doing good work.😊
Shan bhai nailed it❤.
Dhruv rathee :
-Gets paid for promoting one-sided agenda in politics
-Gets paid for promoting one-sided agenda in movie
Very chalakh bro very chalakh😂😂
I love the payment portion the most. How mockingly he tells about Dhruv's payment 😂
I am so happy that I follow this channel from a very long time. So proud of shan prasher to call out dhruv rathee's bias. Brilliant. 🙏🏻
Paise mile he isko ye video banane ke liya
@@chandrabhansingh6778ha ha German Shephard ko har video keliye paisa milta hai
This guy used all different narratives to counter and is very different to what Dhruv said. His viewers should be smart to understand what I am saying.
Not sure, about this but it definitely left a worse impression on teenagers watching this movie. I won't advise people below 25 who are not mature enough to watch this movie. This might influence decision making and normalize this behaviour by actors as okay for our society
Though I am fan of Dhruv, but yes you rightly pointed out his doglapan by showing his clips on Wasseypur and Sacred Games. Good call out Shan!
fan of duggal? have you seen his videos. propaganda at its best
Same
Lol how can u be his fan. 🤣🤣 He is a pathetic person. If u hv brain stay away from his propaganda 😒
@k_t8042 sorry, but I disagree with you. Cos he is the one who calls out the propoangandas, and most of his videos are informational and educational. Here Shan rightly pointed out his dubious review. And I am just a fan of Dhruv as I am of Shan, but not a blind follower of anyone
Anyways, we all are entitled to our opinions and I respect your's
Bss abb toh baat khatam ho gyi...
After watching the Dhruv Rathee video , I felt that UA-cam shouldn't have removed the dislike button
sure
Do you love your mother?
It was disappointing how you didn't tackle anything to what Dhruv said by RELATING it to the actual film! I was waiting only for that, but smh. All you did was call out on how he liked similar projects in the past and that's about it.
I only watched Death Note from that list and THE REASON why that show is celebrated is not because of the so-called "kiddish" level violence BUT because of how CLEVERLY the story was written. Classic cop chasing robber but both were superbly at par with each other in the game. THAT'S what made the show memorable. I was waiting for you to point the same from ANIMAL but you didn't. So that only means it doesn't have much to offer. 🤷🏻♀️
Death Note wasn't "cool" with violence, it was smart and very REAL- what happens to Light at the end of Death Note?
What happens to Joker at the end?
Does the same happen in Animal?
If its an anti-hero then TREAT the character like an anti-hero and NOT as a "hero".
Jokes on you death note's story is completed, animal just completed the first installment don't put your opinions without knowing facts
@@sahilshirsat3949 I'm sorry, it's not on me :) The point is that Light is the villain of that story while L is the hero. If you can relate this to ANIMAL then we'll talk. And EVEN if the series "completes" with him being the villain (which I highly doubt), it certainly failed to do it in the first installment- and that's a fact.
@@bpwinceswhat about Gangs of Vasseypur and all other movies which he promoted. Don't defend Rathee's one sided hypocritical views.
@@dharmeshparikh7837 I defended ONLY for death note because that was a true 'non-violent' masterpiece!
Besides, what druv argued is still true regardless of what he's promoting. So if you agree that he shouldn't have promoted those movies, then you are also indirectly AGREEING that ANIMAL is a film of the same category, so it shouldn't be promoted either. We're on the same page 👍🏼
@@bpwinces if I would start arguing based on that, then sorry, I have to ban many of the oscar winning movies of Martin Scorsese and legendary directors. If you think that there should be no influence of adultery, violence, etc, then ban every freaking movie that has blood, adultery, etc. Because even if you are not specifically glorifying, that scene person can take inspiration from any scene of the movie. It's not necessarily a condition that a mentally challenged person will only be inspired if that scene was glorified. One girl in the West took inspiration from Joker ( Nolan movie) and committed a horrific crime. Even in movies, if a hero is murdering the assassination of bad character, the way the hero murders any criminal can take inspiration. So stop this morality argument. It's ridiculous. Maximum casualties that happened during the earlier half of the 20th century ( 150 millions) tell me how many violent, toxic movies were made during that time. If you have problems with violence,adultery, toxic behavior , racism then condemn every freaking movie, which consists of that. And if I want to be triggered, I can find any reason to be triggered . Ban every James bond movie, Terminator franchise, ban S.A.W, wrong turn, ban Fight club, ban Blood diamond etc. We might also have to ban Indian movies/series like Raman Raghav, Satya, Sacred Games, Mirzapur, etc, because they also not only showed violance but also glorified that. In short, ban the whole movie industry. Either take pure moral position and make movies like Chak de India, Tare Zameen par, A beautiful mind etc, all the time without any sort of bad influence with social messaging. Otherwise, allow all sorts of movies. I don't like this double standard hypocritical attitude of people. In the last 20-30 years middle east has faced millions of casualties due to their own infighting ,bombings, and many more sort of crimes, including sexual assaults. If you compare those casualties with reference to these movies influence on people, then it's not even a drop in the whole water tank. This same thing, on a far huge scale, was there when the world had no toxic movies at all or movie access at all in the 19th and 20th centuries. So don't argue for that, it's very narrow and weak argument.
Films doesn’t change a humans moral conduct but when it glorifies such characters, people with similar though traits and behaviours, this validation makes them act on it.
Baazigar is most loved thriller by every one.Srk killed a girl in the film.Still it is considered best even by Critics.
I watched Oppenheimer some days back , on my way to get my hands on some U235
@@tech_report_0868😂 bro CIA will come after you.
Finally someone logical and entertaining at the same time giving counter relpy to biased video of Dhruv which he is doing from long time
Well done Shan bhai keep going 👏
Abe gadhe tu mat dekha na to usse 😂😂😂
Mujhe hamesa se lagta tha ki mumbai ki ladkiya khubsurat hoti h because of bollywood but aisa nhi h 😢
@@raja-jl9os Tu yaha pe bhi aagaya
@@raja-jl9os Tu konsa State se hai ?!
@@hiteshkumar1314 mere kahne ka matlab h ki mumbai ki ladkiya bhi average hoti h
Let’s not forget that Gangs of Waseypur is real life based story and is about criminal whereas in animal they have shown a normal person doing this kind of stuff. He clearly mentioned that if ranbir has been declared mentally ill or something, it would have been justified.
What abt death note? Breaking bad? It is the fact that he didn't get money to promote it that's it. There are many genuine UA-camrs with less no. Of subscribers and have more ethics and morals than dhruv
ghutno per jorr dalo didi
@@VishnuKavetiDude , the point that dhruv made that senseless violence without any story or use is bad. And he also gave the whole context that when and for whom these movies are bad. Literally 99% of the people against him pick only one point. "Violence is bad in movies" without taking the context.
@@blackbeast9057choro bhai yeh sab logic nahi dudh rehe hai just want attention from us yeh sab intsa aur TikTok wale hai 😂😂
Follow ExMuslim Zafar Heretic to get out of this deadly cult
He may be biased, but on the Gangs of Wasseypur vs Animal comparison bit, how are we completely missing out on the fact that both movies have entirely different messages. The whole point of Gangs of Wasseypur was to convey that violence and criminal ways can never lead to a happy ending. Morever, nothing of this was glamorized in Gangs of Wasseypur. It's not wrong to portray a dark side but it's glamorization is.
Not really. They glamorized a lot of things in Gangs. That is very subjective measure too.
Rightly said. In those movies it does not glorify the criminal activity
Exactly @asmitashaw9156
"Netflix se payment leke.."😂😂😂😂 i loved the way you called out that german shepherd... He is a propaganda master and everyone in india is aware of it by now.. its good that you called out that duffer. 👍
People's capacity for independent thought seems obscured, as evidenced by the gathering of seemingly mindless followers around Dhruv Rathee. His videos, staunchly one-sided, meticulously disseminate a carefully curated agenda that is ingested without question by his devoted audience. Your valiance and courage is commendable Shan 🙌 Thank you for sharing a dissenting perspective I know this will inevitably draw the ire of his zealous followers, who, like a brigade, are poised to inundate the comments section with disparagement. It is a perplexing phenomenon, the sway one person can hold over others, guiding them down a path of unquestioning adherence, even when the narrative presented is heavily skewed.
Itna english merko bhi sikhna hai
Oi, if you are talking about braindead followers then you dont necessarily need to be writing tharoor-ish.
@@bu11ymaguire😂
Couldn't agree more brother.. not just this video but most of dhruv rathee's videos are staunchly one sided and full of cherry picked facts which supports his agenda, on top of that he presents his videos in such a way that a regular viewer of his channel would say that dhruv is totally neutral and is just presenting facts but in reality it's the opposite.
His good thing which attracts millions is his well articulated presentation and easy way of breaking things down..
Is he biased? Yes ofcourse
if you have heard dhruv rathee properly, he always says "usually" and not "always", your allegation that he is calling every viewer of that type of movie as toxic is completely unjustified.
Dhruv is no saint ma'am , he has mastered the art of cherry picking
Exactly. He never said that people who watch violent movies are toxic. He said that people who angrily defend these movies to the point of attacking others on social media are toxic
According to me, this video is more of a criticism of DHRUV RATHEE and not of his Analysis regarding ANIMAL MOVIE. You are making your point just on the basis of his past collaborative videos which might prove HIM (Dhruv) a hypocrite but does not make your point regarding the dhruv's analysis SENSELESS. After watching your video, we can only conclude that In addition to ANIMAL MOVIE, Gangs of Wasseypur, Death Note, etc are also CANCER.
Suppose that review of animal movie was made by some other creator then you had no counter since you did not made any point about how the movies like ANIMAL are NOT cancer to our society. Just because Manoj Bajpayee told that it does not influence the youth's behaviour, it doesn't prove that it will not. He is just another fellow actor who himself makes such movies so how can he himself say the BITTER TRUTH.
Also, your point regarding TARGET AUDIENCE is baseless because in today's generation, there is little-to-no difference between a 14 yr kid and a 25 yr boy who have very little control over their emotions and are tend to follow the SO-Called "Internet Trends."
Are you dumb; dude he said ki usne call out Kiya hai dusre video me ye video sirf counter hoga toh dhruv rathee 😵💫 incomplete video dekh ke mat pass Karo comments
Dhruv promoted more toxic movies than ANIMAL okk
@@theKrishnaMale Brother the topic is not DHRUV RATHEE, the topic is his analysis about Animal movie which is 100% correct.
After seeing this video we MAY conclude that Dhruv is a hypocrite but his opinion on animal review IS NOT senseless at all. In fact i wonder what would have been the case if some other creator would pointed out the toxicity of animal movie
@@harsh8499 if he cares for society and people,, then why he promoted such films and called them classic cult movie,, he could have reject this promotion,, ask him why in DM
@@theKrishnaMale are you not understanding my point? The thing is even if he is hypocrite but his views regarding the animal movie is 100% correct acc to me. IT is not about dhruv rathee, it is about such violent movies with no msg at the end which promote nothing but toxicity at its best.
The video of Dhruvs on animal movie was the first time I disagreed. "Movies should be taken as a movie not reality". One sided perceptions is always wrong perspective.
Yes, absolutely bhi sab ne yeh logic hoga na hypocrisy hoga samaj ni paye
@@sonalikain Haha bs yuhi rak diya atscha lga isliye:)
If u intelligent, u will understand, almost every video he make is paid to cater to a particular audience which is already biased and opinionated abt a certain topic. The rythemic way in which he speaks and everything that parashar pointed out. If anybody thinks its just abt animal movie review must be kidding himself
Same with four more shots please and veera di wedding. Films should be taken as Film
Thank you for coming up and addressing this with an objective video. More power to you!
He may have called out some points in Dhruv’s video, but to negate Dhruv’s argument, he would need to prove that animal is not a cancer for society, but in fact good for society. He hasn’t been able to prove that, nor establish that, and just keeps rambling on like an idiot. 🤐
"Thats why education is important" wale nahi dikh rahe 🤡
😂😂
Most Sensible replies that Dhruv Rathee fans have when someone criticise him😂
1: "ANdBhakT"
2: "ThAtS wHy eEucaTiOn iS imPortaNt"
3:"He Is moRE edUCatEd thaN you "
4: "hE AlwayS sAys TruTh"
5: " WhAtSApP UniVErciTy faCts"
@@JaiJAGGANATH453 yes, only librandus can understand molana dhruv lathee
That's why besides education before making a video against dhruv watching his full video is important 🤣
@@Sarthak_Joravar and most sensible haters of dhruv rathee like u 🐵
Thank you for calling out hypocrisy of Dr. Shepherd
Dhruv Rathee didn't like violence and message used in Animal but for sure he definitely liked Game of Thrones and squid games kind of movies cuz those movies or series are in foreign languages and that is cool according to him...
He never said that.Those were reality of those times.this is created with plot.also this is celebrating anti heroism and this should only be watched by adults but here teenagers and kids watch
@@human6729then it's the fault of parents ki wo apne bache ko nahi sambhal sakte
Tbh....Game of Thrones is way different (and way better) than animal....both have violence but one glorifies it and one doesn't....there ain't no regret in Ranveer Kapoor's character....to a certain point the violence was justifiable but then it crossed the limits.... especially with the womanizing part.... Game of Thrones is on a totally different arc
explain how animal glorify violence and GOT not? jab ki waha l katne wala scene bhi tha @@Writing_freak
@@Writing_freak
Yes.. unnecessary nudity and having incestual relationship is totally normal and an integral part of Society as shown in GOT.
👍
The Much Needed Video!!!!
Finally someone is understanding how to tackle this Manipulator.
It’s called “giving a choice to the audience”. Gangs of Wasseypur was narrated such a way that all those killings and blood shed were not stylised but was shown as a reflection of their everyday life. The filmmaker gave a choice to the audience wherein they can choose right from wrong. Animal on the other hand glorifies the protagonist so much so that the killings adultery misogyny and regressiveness is blatantly justified. That is exactly where the problem really is. Portraying a character is different from worshiping a character. Animal worships, GoW portrays.
Itni baat fanboys ko thodi smjh aayegi, they're on blind defence mode, especially this shaan..idk if he is being paid by vanga himself the way he is defending animal with his life and blood lol
When did it glorify. Both Rashmika and Ranbir faced consequences of their actions. Have u even watched the film or just watched it in reels?
@@adityaunde4134where did they faced consequences? Lmao he cheated on her and then kissed her to not go away.
I think you mixed Violence Action and Toxicity altogether..
portraying violence is not an issue, real issue is justifying or being ok about it. Gangs of Wasseypur or any other movies that Dhruv promoted never showed what the hero is doing as justified or normal. And Salman khan has done n number of meaningless action movies think hard why there is no objection for those ? There is a difference between Violence and Action which you clearly mixed.
That dog 🐕 clearly a biased youtuber and his followers are uneducated enough to think beyond his propoganda.
So accurate and so good. Thank you so much for creating such well researched video bcz it’s so sad tht people like dhruv just like to force their opinions on people.
Why people still watching his propaganda videos ?
He has been exposed numerous time for giving biased facts from Leftist news articles.
We Indians have a problem where we see Veed or "crowd" we go to that shop.
German Shepard is just using that mindset of Indians.
I always cross check information after watching something & i could not stand his Leftist biased videos stopped watching his videos for 4 years, moreover he claims he is unbiased , at least he should be honest with his audience
What is bcz?
because@@nitinpratap3958
Dhruv rathe is best explainer😊
@@KADAKSAMBALPURI a german shepard puppy detected
Shan Is One Of The Intelligent UA-camrs I Have Seen, The Way He Puts Logic With Knowledge Is Mind Blowing 🙏🏻🔥
U do know that neil deGrasse is also on UA-cam😅
He is scientist fool not a youtuber@@rishavrai99999
2:46 -- Gangs of Wasseypur
4:57 -- Secret Game's
5:42 -- Breaking Bad
6:42 -- Death Note
This is an analysis in the true sense of the word. And kudos to you for doing this without any bias.
I don't get one thing Shan ji, even if Dhruv Rathee promoted violent movies in his past videos, and now his opinion has changed for whatever reasons saying that violence is bad, or being sadist is bad, I mean, whats wrong in that? Can't a same person have two opinions at different times in their lives? Can't the same person evolve with time? And I am not saying he actually did as i don't know him personally. All I am saying that movies like 'thank you coming'/four more shots, etc were senseless and cheap and aptly called out for fake feminism by male reviewers like yourself to be banned from being made completely, which I agree with, but I don't see many women UA-camrs calling out mysogeny, immense violence and most uncomfortable scenes throughout the movie, Animal. I haven't watched the movie, never intend to as its short clips on Instagram have already made me cringe and uncomfortable to sit through them in their entirety. In conclusion, this is not a black and white situation, if Dhruv Rathee is being hypocritical in his recent videos and Manoj Bajpayee says that movies don't change society, I can give you numerous examples both good and bad ones (more in small towns and cities) influencing 18 year olds ( which btw are still called teenagers and there is no guarentee that maturity always come with age), so the fight is not to bring out each other flaws in counter argument videos, rather get united towards a common goal for everyones good.
Nice try to defend tatti.Then he should have deleted his videos and apologised in his recent video for reviewing them. How dumb you are😂
Rightly said. I m happy one person thinks like me
@@mariapauline8732 Count me. absolutely agreed
Shan..plz invite Dhruv on your podcast.. and lets have debate on this. It will be great to see how two intellectuals are exchanging their thoughts on this issue 🙂
duggal is intellectual? since when?
@@k_t8042true 😂
intellectual? oh really? XD
I used to think the same thing about Dhruv... now no more lol
I was same "Munnu" like age at that time, 12-14 years old
now I am mature enough and left watching Dhruv lol coz he is BIASED and ANTI NATIONAL to the core... explains why he lives in "Germany" (also his Al Jazeera collaborations and BBC collaborations, one being Qatar owned news agency, and other being British one, both highly biased AGAINST India, trying to attack India every time, shows how much of an anti national he is)
you can still live in your way btw, I wont call you "words" to demean you, as some of the, or MOST of the Dhruv fans, always do
"ejukesan is important saar"
"andhbhakt hahaha"
"gau mutra Modi is bad Modi shud rejine"
- most educated Dhruv Rathee watcher
Ikr you aint that type of a person, but you will become like this if you dont stop watching him, its still your call btw... you can do whatever you want... just always notice, his videos which are EDUCATIONAL are generic videos, just made fancy using good editing team, those videos have material from just WIKIPEDIA only, no research done whatsoever
and his other videos are all anti BJP and anti India videos, no wonders he has been proven to be an AAP worker (not supporter, yes a "worker" rather, top level one as well) by this youtuber - Engineer Xplains
do I agree with everything Engineer Xplains other videos show, nope... but do I agree with his expose video on Dhruv, hell yes
he said once in a propaganda video of his (on Statue of Unity) that the collections done in Taj Mahal, were just 25 crore rupees a year for 80 million people (which comes out at 0.32 rupees per person !!!, just 32 paise !!) in recent years
WHAT. THE. HELL... and then he proceeded to use this statistic and said "this way, Statue of Unity will take 100-120 years to recover its costs, why was a School or Hospital not made instead??" and proved it with biased data
now what? the stats show Statue of Unity is said to recover costs within just 15 or at max 20-25 years, upto 5 times lesser time actually, if we take 15, its almost 10 times faster cost recover
and he wont call out other nations building statues...
and he IGNORED that after statue will be made, the place will have employment and business opportunities for the people, the area surrounding the statue will get developed, and as more people come to settle nearby, schools and hospitals will AUTOMATICALLY be made
this is a small fraction of proof of expose of Dhruv Rathee... even for showing this, people might call me out instead XD
bruh imagine, 32 paise per person was earned... literally?
bro, even auto wont take you to 10 cms far away at 32 paise... and he said that TOURISTS (who pay legit 1000s or rupees, lakhs for foreigners), would just pay "32 paise" ???
he never mentioned this 32 paise thing, he just said "25 crore rupees earned from 80 million tourists"
bhai sahab, ticket ki price bhi aaj kal 100-1000 rupay ke neeche nahi jaati, aur isne 32 paise indirectly bataya, and logg bewakoof bann bhi gaye
Abhi shan ki intni aukat nhai hai ki wo dhruv ko bolaye
@@Abhishek-vv1yg vo bulaye main tab bhi na dekhun. saw his podcast with ranveer and that was enuf. what a fake guy
Ok so this comment isnt mine but I love it and I think more people need to see it :
Also I dont think anyone could explain Dhruv rathees video any better -
A man is a product of his environment. It means that a person's behaviour is moulded by their surroundings. This factor includes everything,, Friends family relatives. Additionally mass media players major roles. For example you see Sandeep Reddy Vanga. He says that he grew up watching gangster movies. And yess he did not become a gangster. But the fact that he is continuously producing movies like these is proof that his mind has been distorted by the content he grew up watching.And that is the whole point. No one outrightly becomes a gangster after watching these movies but they start normalizing it and become desensitized to it. And if you watched dhruv's video then you must know he clearly said that 1 or 2 bad or good movie neither make us bad nor best. He didn't say that violence movie are bad untill there is right or moral ending. In the end if the hero was Psychologically troubled or mentally ill then that's okay but there is no redemption at the end of the movie. Here See Amir Khan,, he never did these kind of movies, he focused on teens, he never promoted Vimal pan masala ads. Even if he acted in violent movies like Ghajni but he gave a feeling of hatred towards violence in those movies and also Kindness wins in the end. He knew his audience and understand them more than the cheap advertisers or Fame milking directors. True legend. We actually need more people like him.And Dhruv's content never disappoints. The detailing in his videos and yet presentation of it in such simple manner is so impressive. Idk why you are telling this. And lastly if you are a fan of Animal then. And as for everyone talking about how he doesnt review shows and movies like 4 more shots please, then do check out his toxic Feminism video before speaking
😂😂itna lmba likha bhaiyya prha hi ni gya. pkka aap ye dekh k chirh jao gy. achi slah deta hu k aap ki explanation ki pehli line jis mein aap n likha k aadmi ka mahol or aas paas ki hr chiz brtav pr asr dalti hai bilkul wese hi us aadmi droov ki batein aap k oopr ek mnfi(negative) asr dal rhi hai, ho sky to chhor di jiye ga.
bhai all points noted, but the fact irrespective of misogyny, toxic masculinity, the fact that movie has so many plot holes that is not good, I mean every body performed at their max and everything, but the story line was bad. They didn't discover the depth of father-son relation and so many unnecessary sub-plots. The film was a blunder and didn't have a reason to surpaas Sambhadur.
The main offence is that Four more shot, wanabe cringe and movies like this are appreciated and not good movies. I mean if one compare Rocket singh was way better than this movie.
Even Kabir singh was WAAAY better than this movie. And many are saying it is pure class, it is not.
Yeah the concept was good , but execution was horrible
EDIT - Wanga sold the movie through controversy, The movie didn't have weightage on it's own
- I don't care about Rathee
Well I do believe that cinema and media introduces changes in our societies. I don't agree with Manoj Vajpayee, he is a good actor but not a good observer. Cinema and media culture bring the traits that is very well followed by youth, like seeking and making relationship, stalking, gang-war, embracing smoking, alcohol and party culture. Now Toxic male and female will be adorn by youth. Pyaar sabne sahrukh khan se hi sikha hai.
U r nowadays hitting out of the park by your awesome analysis!!!
Dhruv ratthe fans are so innocent thinking themself educated by watching his biased videos😂😂
sorry bro/mam, i disagree with you. Mr. Rathee videos are only other side of the coin. Always Mr. Arnab Goswami cannot be right. only because he shouts louder , heis argumets are ONLY THE TRUTH. I have the basic right to keep my opinion , so mr Rathee has. Dissent is te basic right of Democracy , whic unfortunately has been in oblivion for some time .
😂😂😂😂😂 u must be proud of watching animal that glorifies extreme level of violence and cringe subject matter
Jio janta dhruv rathee audience 🥱
I believe anyone can have an opinion. If you liked the Animal movie well and good; if you hated the movie then also well and good. But judging the persons that liked the film and calling them mentally unstable, misogynist, repressed is not correct.
Who tf are you to judge anyone according to their taste in movies
Money bhi to important he
@@chandrabhansingh6778next time animal part 2 will give him money to give positive reviews
There is nothing wrong with calling out a film for teaching something harmful to society, as it can validate criminals of that kind in real life. Given the existing levels of craziness, hate, and violence in the real world, it is crucial to be mindful of the impact media can have on shaping perceptions and behavior.
@@TheCatAndTheArt wrong is hypocrisy
Calling animal cancer & promoting gangs of wassepur sacred games breaking bad because netflix pays him momey to give positive reviews?
@@TheCatAndTheArt Ok so according to you we should ban the entire action-thriller genre
No, no dhruv is absolutely right...after watching his videos...I have stopped watching adult movies and started watching Disney movies...now i identify myself as a Disney princesses..👸🏿
Awesome bro..
A tight slap on hypocrisy..
Proud of you Shan..🤗❤️
Shan Prasher Aapne toh Dhruv ko attack kiya. How did you prove that Animal itself is not a cancer movie? You achieved basically nothing with this dumb video. Sure, you’ve called out Dhruv. But you haven’t yet established that this movie is not cancer.
Prove that this movie is good for society, not a cancer, then you’ll be worth time. Otherwise you’re just trying really hard to sound smart.
@@msredcurtains
At first only he said that he is not going to take any side or will he defame Dhruv..
And I also said "slap on hypocrisy not Dhruv.."
So I hope you got the answer?
It is nothing personal bro..
Take care
@@msredcurtains You want a proof that animal is good for scoiety, Then read this
1) Even if Ranbir kapoor had e terrible relationship with his father in this film, As and when he came to know about the attempt to murder of his father, He left everything and came to him.
2) Ranbir slept with tripti dimri in this film and rashmika was not aware about it. Still he told her that thing, and left Tripti dimri with respect that she can go anywhere .
3) If you have seen ranbir with his child, He has treated him with all love and care that means he has not passed the same experience to his son which he has felt in his childhood.
4) And last, If you think Revenge taken by ranbir was wrong, then let me remind you how our judicial system is strong enough to punish the real criminals.
Same it's like saying Violent game is bad for children. Then ban gta6.
Grow up guys
Shaan ki bhi payment ho gai
Someone of Team Animal give some pedigree to the German shepherd.
Only then the German shepherd will bark the positivity of Animal film 😅😅😅😅
no wonder we always try to put personal comments on their personal life of the
people who are in public life. let it be mr. pawan kalyan in AP or any one else we are habituated for a long time . dont worry the attempt to change has begun, manzil door nahi hai bhai
The thing is both 4 more Shots and Animal are toxic. However, the problem is when we just diss Thank you for coming and 4 more shots but celebrate Animal. Aur iss genre ko kya kehte hai Shan bhai, Sigma male genre.
4 more Shots are much much much toxic movie then animal
Kaise toxic hai animal? Isme cheating ko glorify kiya? Usne apni biwi pe hath uthaya? Disrespect kiya sabke samne? Kaise hai toxic?
@@pritech8302 Agreed. These people are shown as protagonist in the story which is quite problematic.
If you look at Gangs of Wasseypur, none of the characters are protagonists and each died a horrible death in the story. That's not the case with movies like Thank you for coming or Animal. They glorify promiscuity and adultery.
@@lilrogue6869wahi toh bro.. Sabse jyda females hi danger ban chuka hain society ke liye
@@ronnie_2910 Not every anti-hero have to die at the end of the movie. That would make the genre too predictable which Animal isn't, instead it showed physical & relational consequences in the form of his body organs getting failed, wife leaving him, his dad dying which is far more consequential than the his own death, even Bobby's motive wasn't to kill him but to kill his father & every family members through his look-a-like that would've destroyed Ranvijay's character from the inside. The 2nd part might even have more of these consequences like Gangs of Wasseypur 2 had.
Bhai kucch bhi bolo.... Druv k logic jyada strong hai compared to you.
The reason being, he doesn't make videos for movies only but huge aspects of topics which requires deep analysis. ( Your video is just about criticising with no value addition😢)
Cherry picking karne aur bias narrative rachne ko deep analysis nahi bolte.
Haan isiliye usne kashmir files jaise movie ke upar baat nahi kiya
Logic strong hone ke liye logic hone bhi to chahiye
Shan bhai aap jo bol rahe ho woh baat bilkul sahi hain but iska mtlb yeh nhi hain ki animal acchi movie hai aur uska koi effect nhi hoga society mai...
There's a difference between violence in gangs of wasseypur and animal. Let's talk about perspective, the way violence is portrayed can change how audience percies it. I remember watching wasseypur first time and it was scary to watch. The violence was so terrifying to see, i suppose it depends how the director intends it to be seen. During no point in violence it was percieved as "cool", each violent scene was hard to watch. Watching animal's violence doesnt feel the same way, it's almost shown as "heroic" or "cool". That's the whole point of direction, it's upto director how to actually portray a scene.
Cinema has an absolute power to create impact in the minds of its viewers. Look at the women of India. They have watched saas bahu serials all their lives which is why they act the way they do. Similarly, men in the Indian society act this way because of the media they consumed in 80's and 90's. It was regressive. In this present age, if a milennial like you heaps praises of a regressive movie on the very first day of its release then it's nothing too shocking. We are a product of what we consume and all your videos on the movie Animal prove it to be so. Gone are the days when a milennial would praise a coming-of-age move. because if anything you guys are only going back.
😂😂😂 Seriously after reading your comment I feel like according to you either everyone do not have their mind of their be it men or women; or people have emotional so weak that they get influenced easily by any one
I mean seriously you think all women got influenced by the saas bahu serials and all men got influenced by regressive media according to you... Surely you must be living under a rock I must say... Can't blame you as people just want to put biased opinions based on narrative which suits them
That's how things are these days... And honestly Shantanu is actually a true millennial who puts forward all the pointers good or bad..
True man, media affects our way of thinking, and anyone who laughs it off either is dumb or doesn’t want to be called out for their imitating capabilities. Movies creators should be careful of what they put out their as audience is still very impressionable
@@msredcurtains then I guess if these people who get easily influenced by movies should stay away from watching a movie in the first place.. really people have become so emotionally weak these days that seems like they really don't have a mind of their own
🤣🤣🤣🤣
No actually acc to shan only female toxicity based movies are able to affect the society not male toxicity based movies because after seeing it he feels adrenaline rush 😂
I felt the same way watching Druv's video because I clearly remembered him promoting these other such violent movies with Netflix. And yes, I agree with Manoj sir that movies just influence a hairstyle, not people's personality. Thank you for this well spoken video. ❤
People need to stop imaging children watching and thinking what will be the impact on their mind because this movie isnt for kids. 😂
hey, are you sure films don't change people's mindset and thoughts 🤔 I think films change mindset if you like any movie and decided to change your hairstyle your mindset also will be change according to the movie...
after watching wasepur people started repeating its dialog publicly and that was abusive words.. the 3rd class language that youth used on a daily basis comes from movies only !!
larki pata lenge types of words they learn from movies.. love story type Bollywood movies directly change our society
People need to rewatch what Dhruv said and what this guy is saying line by line and you guys will find out this guy just opposed for the sake of it, not at all been able to prove Dhruv wrong. :P
@@TheCatAndTheArt Stop spamming every comment. We get it, you are butt licker of that german shepherd.😆😆
Regarding change of mindset through movie/series, the best example is fake feminism promoted in the series like 4 more shots, made in heaven etc etc. and people are getting influenced by these movies/series.
@@No_One1231 you are absolutely right, if you remember kerela story movie.. because of this movie people started arguing and even fighting for Hindu Muslim community and the movie was so popular that's why it dubbed in all languages.. The BJP party was promoting this movie like their own house movie .. each and every popular movie affects our society and mindsets very effectively it's 💯% sure
Gangs of wasseypur- protagonist dies
Breaking bad- protagonist dies
Animal- protagonist glorified
Thoda dimaag laga le bhai
Are heisenberg bhai 2nd part to aane deta😂😂
Lol hutiye.. Matlab hero mara toh sab changa...? 😂 SRK ke kitne movies ginau jiss mein vo toxic hai aur zinda rehta hai?
Agar accha na laga to mal dekh, simple logic
I haven't watched the movie so don't have much to say about it.
But from the information I've collected, the problem is with the director glorifying the violence in the film. And the audience in the theatres that are applauding the problematic scenes.
You have to watch the movie to know the full context. Take it as a movie where te character is grey instead of black and white.
Its fine if you don’t agree with one’s opinions but you simply can’t compare it with GOW. When people watch gangs of wasseypur they feel fear, disgust or even helplessness. There is no glamourus aesthetic or cool bgm in action sequences, unlike animal.
Anyway there’s no way a person can defend animal. It may not affect you but it can affect the society.
Adultery, violence, everything shown in Gangs of Vasseypur, Sacred Games, Mirzapur etc doesn't offend you then Animal shouldn't offend you too.