@@purpleblackberries6850 Not all films are made as reflection of society😂. Films take huggggge creative liberty thus making them fictious. Sabse ameer aadmi ko goli lage na toh Desh ki saree police udhar lg jaygi, aur poore film mein ek bhi police nhi hai, 1 of the many facts that prove this film is nowhere reflection of society
I have seen both videos , and both are biased. Both have done well researched and point out their Targeted portion. Dhruv Pick up Munnu and went through his oife time journey, he didn't say that munnu watch this film But he said munnu face some similar incidents in his child life then as a adult he watch this film , that create an impact on his mind. Yes some people don't influence but some people influence by elvish yadav as well. Shan can't guarantee that no one influenced by ANIMAL. Dhruv Rathi's narrative was more right because he also said that Some people only may influence but it create a big impact as a part of domino effect, If 10cr people will watch the movie and 0.0025% people influenced then the number is 2500 Out of them 10% will start crime then it's 250 criminals. So both are right in their opinion Shan is talking about remain 9.999 cr Dhruv is talking about that 2500
Dhruv should say something on Toxic feminism movies/series like 4 more shots Tnx for coming dear zindagi Made in haven jee karda lipstick under virgin vanupria bobby begum
You should be ashamed of your existence for subscribing to one of the delutarded youtubers. Shame...shame ....shame Edit: Add some value to your life by doing something useful
Since i saw dhruvs video, i knew his opinion was one sided and biased but the way u broke down his narrative and psychology behind is very detailed. Well done!
Dhruv rathee is a beta male. His gf probly seeks other men for satisfaction and is with the German leprosy patient only for money. I live in his district in Haryana. Almost everyone knows here that Dhruv Rathee's mother is a red light district worker. If anyone wants I can prove it by providing her services. Since rathee got famous, her rates have gone up.
Dhruv Rathee clearly stated violence and evil characters should be shown in a particular way and not in a heroic way. There is no redemption in Animal movie or Kabir Singh, they remain hero till the end which is why it makes it toxic. Dirty picture is dirty too but Vidya balan is not shown in a good light. No body will be inspired by what she played on screen bcoz the grey lines was reflected subtly through the movie.So good and evil characters need to have it's own consequences. We should not glamorize toxic characters that's what Dhruv said.
@@castelessaastik4655 but by the end, they suffer due to this attitude and actions as well. Sardar Khan dies, Faizal Khan cried in a scene saying" I never wanted to get involved in this" and was killed by his own step brother. Nagma was killed, Durga betrayed Sardar. Ramadhir was killed by Faizal. They all suffered in the end
@@Mkeyline_112 Didn't Ranvijay Singh suffer in the end? His whole body got damaged. His sense of taste/smell vanished. His sister is widow now. 2 of his brothers got killed by Aziz. His wife left him. His dad jiske liye vo itna pagal tha, pata chalta hai he is diagnosed with cancer and only few months are left until he is dead. His whole family has been destroyed. To add more to that, there is Aziz now who has cloned Ranvijay's face and now burning in fire of revenge and is ready to destory his whole lineage and wants to capture Swastik Enterprises. He used to feel bad about his father not giving enough time to him. But eventually vo bhi aisa hi baap ban gaya hai end me jo apni family ko zara sa bhi time nahi de raha hai. Itna suffer karna kaafi nahi hai tunhare liye.
lol from begining he always gives onesided narrative only...Dhruv rathi is like a 'baba' for todays kids living in gated societies. He dresses in modern clothing and gives an illusion to its listeners of being part of some 'factual crowd'.....and 'different than rest of population'.
@@malehachowdhury5614 difference is ppl who watch Shan's video arent like Dhruv's cult.....where they treat every word spoken by their 'messiah of facts'...as ultimate truth
@@atheist1586 LOL really dude ? The BGM was playing Jeeya ho bihar ke lala when Manoj bajpai character was dying in Part 1. Also in Breaking Bad, they turned skyler into a hated wife character to make the fans side with Walter and then they turned Jesse Pinkman into babyface to turn him into a villain. Full Glorification
Really film doesn't change the society, agr aisa hota to money heist dekhkr sb chori krne lgte , Spiderman dekhkr sab building se kudte.. pr logo ko reality pta hoti h kya Krna h ky nhi.m wo just entertainment ka jariya h
@@Anmoluserhow do you know ki kitne logo ne apna de decesion change kar diya. Will they come out and say ki I watched 3 idiots and it changed my decision of not taking my life? Dude these things happens on personal level
@@iklokesh19 bro mere kehne ka mtlb tha ki agar movies se inspire log hone lagte toh chhichore jaisi movies dekhne ke baad at least suicide rate kam toh hota but last year hi dekh lo aur ek baat batao koi bilkul seedha saadha insaan movie dekh ke gangster ban sakta hai kya??? nhi na sirf wahi log criminal ban sakte hai movies dekh ke jinki thought process hi criminals ki tarah hai jis insaan ki soch criminal ki tarah hai woh kisi bhi cheez se inspire hoke crime kar sakta hai tum jo chori ka bata rhe ho money heist se toh jin logon ne chori ki unke dimaag mei hi chori karne waali baatein ghumti rehti hongi uss series se toh unhe push mila tha aur aisa push kahin se bhi mil sakta hai newspapers se, articles se, novels se toh kya inn sab ko bhi band karwa de???
-Wife and kid left him - Father is about to die - Almost half of bones in his body are broken - A psycho is after him to Butcher his family Without being sympathetic vanga is shown how every action has consequences. He didn't justify any of his act.
Yes but there are people who r defending the character. They are soo ignorant about the fact that Ranbir character is problematic. It's the audience that are defending the characters and those who are pointing out the wrong things that shown in the movie are said that they are fake feminist. Seriously people need to grow up
@@shreyaranjan400non of this feminist shows this point that bro share they actually called Sandeep vanga biggot mysoginy or woman abuser that's why they are feminist God just forgot to give brain to them 😂😂
Exactly....nd same was with kabir singh...reddy very cleverly shows that his charatrs have flaws nd because of these flaws his charactrs face terrible consequences...in kabir singh literally his license was revoked in the end...people just dont get this
I wish Dhruv could make a similar video about the toxicity in series and movies like 'Thank you for coming' and 'Four more shots' but we all know he won't since it doesn't fit on his political ideology
@@rocky3850 n there u went wrong. Boys knows the animal character where he is wrong or right. Jaise Neha dhupia ki baat me akalmand ladkiya agree nhi kra tha to yaha ladke galat ko promote nhi kr rhe they just enjoying the mass action, stylish movie n coolness that's it. I'm being a girl, a wife too ,loved this movie. Jahan galat laga wo galat laga jahan accha lga wo accha laga. That's it finished kuch nhi uske baad. Baat itna bhadhana kyu. Film dekh liya bs utna hi uspe itna sochna kyu. Ab jo jayda sochega wo insaan hi problematic hai. Usse har dusre teesre film me influence hona hoga.
I am not a Dhruv Rathee supporter, but I feel Shan, it’s very important to point out here, that I’m gangs of Wasseypur or sacred games, there is no visual grammar of glorification, which is present in animal. I felt that the visual grammar of animal, be it background music or writing, it’s very important to note that there is no redemption arc, there is no morality, and I felt very uncomfortable when people in the theatre are whistling and shouting for the abusive scenes.
You need to become strong that's all I would say. People laugh on Men Abuse jokes too. That time did u think all those ?? It's a movie and people were supposed to react like that. Then according to you, Dark humour shouldn't exist.
I agree , they were doing something wrong , they were the anti hero , we do support them , but in our minds we know they made some bad decision, some terrible circumstances, thing go wrong But in case of animal , all of this is shown as giga chad behaviour
@KratosMessi-eo1yl dude. I’m talking about glorifying domestic violence. He’s literally abusing his wife, and people in the theatre are clapping and cheering. Is this a representation of masculinity?!
Sadly Dhruv's Video has 8 million views and this video will hardly get a few 100 thousand views.. we need to push such videos highlighting bias and hypocrisy of so called influencers like Dhruv Rathee
So true...pathan acchi nhi thi Bs usse itna support iss liye mila kyuki usme srk tha aur wo M u s... h If ajay,or akshay would hv been the lead in that movie phir yahi dhruv jaise uska mzak bnate
Some mad guy made a stupid movie and i see people fighting between each other for that movie. This samosa youtuber made a video just as an answer to another fellow UA-camr. Shame on you. Dhruv rathe doesnot care, he doesn’t have time to answer to this cheap people
Does it matter, people don't go to movies to watch well-made films, they go to enjoy. Fight scene were cool, Tripti was looking sexy, songs were good. Acting performance were top norch, not all but many comedic punches were landed.
Films don't influence a society; the society influences films. A film is a reflection of the society. One can choose to moan over the bad reflection or not even look at it. But the image remains whether you wish to accept it or not. Films can never change the moral values of a person as they depend on his/her upbringing and education. I've watched countless films with extremely problematic lead characters but I've never even thought of copying them. I see them as troubled individuals that need help. They serve as a reminder of what not to become in life. If someone becomes morally corrupt just by watching a few films, there is a serious issue with the individual's upbringing, social circle or education. If films had such a huge influence on people, why haven't most people embraced progressive agendas and revolutionary ideas? Critics shouldn't burden films with their own morality. A film can be whatever it's maker wants it to be.
Dhruv rathee is a beta male. His gf probly seeks other men for satisfaction and is with the German leprosy patient only for money. I live in his district in Haryana. Almost everyone knows here that Dhruv Rathee's mother is a red light district worker. If anyone wants I can prove it by providing her services. Since rathee got famous, her rates have gone up.
If any sensible or logical person watches SRV movies, you know the main character is always the real villain of the story. I was more scared of RANVIJAY than ABRAR in ANIMAL
People who defending animal saying its just a movie should have kept their mouth shut while they were trying to boycott PK and padmawati movie. If you saying movie hei kuch bhi chalega then you should keep that mindset for all movie, not just selective movies 😂, isse 1000x accha hei sam bahadur.
This is the bestest video of yours till date.. brilliantly explained.. That's like an educated boy, with no fake narrative and propoganda..full support to you shan brother..👍
Shan Prasher Aapne toh Dhruv ko attack kiya. How did you prove that Animal itself is not a cancer movie? You achieved basically nothing with this dumb video. Sure, you’ve called out Dhruv. But you haven’t yet established that this movie is not cancer. Prove that this movie is good for society, not a cancer, then you’ll be worth time. Otherwise you’re just trying really hard to sound smart.
@@msredcurtains Abe chomu usne kabhi nahi bola yeh movie good hai society keliye aur dusri baat tere jaise kamzor mindset wale itna hi influence ho jaate hai toh movies dekhna chod de tu phir jitne dhruv rathee ne acha review diya ganga of wasseypur sacred games jaisi woh konsa good hai society
@@thegameking3931 so are you a disrespectful person inherently or did you get influenced by these movies to be disrespectful? Neither should make you proud. Chomu it seems, speak for yourself bro.
@@msredcurtains Abe chomu sabko apne tarah samjha hai kya tune Jo koi bhi movies dekhe influence ho jaata hai itna bada gawar nahi hu shyad tere surrounding ke honge aur tu movies dekhna chod de Indian movies se influence hojayega toh Hollywood movies tujhe dekhne bhi nahi chahiye. Jaha baat influence ki toh meine Indian movies dekhi bhi nahi hai 2 3 saal se toh tere point invalid hai aur tujhe kyu lagta movie dekhna kuch proud jaisa hai gochu chomu tu hai aur rahega
Dhruv was saying ki movies aesi banni chahiye ki jisne violence ko glamorise na Kiya jaaye , he meant ki Jo khoon karaba kar Raha hai use galat dikhana chahiye, jo women par control karta hai, use galat dikhana chahiye, but animal me aesa karne Wale ko hero dikhaya gya hai, tum logo ko samajh aana chahiye ki the message that he gave while criticising animal were all correct,
I had exactly the same feeling while watching his video. I feel that, just like us, he has the right to express his opinion, but not at the cost of looking down on others. If you didn't like the movie, that's fine; you can come out and put your opinion, but when you are doing it with ill intentions, that's when your opinion turns into propaganda.
He's just using his audience into believing ki Jo vo sochta h Jo uske opinions hain waise hi sbke hone chahiye!!! That's how he keeps manipulating each and every subscriber
This guy used all different narratives to counter and is very different to what Dhruv said. His viewers should be smart to understand what I am saying.
This guy used all different narratives to counter and is very different to what Dhruv said. His viewers should be smart to understand what I am saying.
He never said that neither trying to do this ,the video is criticising his hypocrisy how he promoted movies containing violence in past plus his analysis of movie isn't right he called fans toxic because they like animal.makes no sense
Bhai ... You can't take manoj 's statement just for the sake of proving your point... Films do have impact on the society.. A single film called KANTARA changed the life of Daiva nartakas in Karanataka... Now Govt. Giving them financial aid the perishing art form got new life after Kantara hit.
@@mithileshchakravarty3883 if you are not inspired from Mangalyaan doesn't mean that nobody else has ..... Becoming scientist is not preparing 2 min. Maggie...
"Netflix se payment leke.."😂😂😂😂 i loved the way you called out that german shepherd... He is a propaganda master and everyone in india is aware of it by now.. its good that you called out that duffer. 👍
This is the way to call out Dhruv’s personal biased opinion. And psychological terms are on point 👏🏼 I don’t think anyone else could have made a better video on replying Dhruv rathee 🔥🔥
@@SilvioDante-qg7dc popularity he has is for knowledgable content about history science and politics.he is not a movie reviewer .dhruv said gangs of wasseypur as clut movie....and now he has algery with voilence and animal is cancer..he just made the vedio cuz Animal is the hot topic and everyone is watching it and he seek opportunity for more views and more subscriber. but he forget about his past vedios bullshit.
Sahi to kaha Dhruv on ANIMAL movie. Atleast there was someone who talked against the movie. Aap bhi support karo on this instead of finding unecessary faults and targeting him.
Art in its purest form will always be about the expressionist (expressing what the artist wants to say) rather than the communicator (focusing on the concerns of the viewer). Hope this settles pretty much every debate regarding this movie.
He may have called out Dhruv’s video, but to negate Dhruv’s argument, he would need to prove that animal is not a cancer for society, but in fact good for society. He hasn’t been able to establish that, and just keeps rambling on like an idiot.
@@msredcurtains problem is hypocrisy of druv rathee and his fans like you.On one side he promotes gow, breaking bad and sacred games and then he criticize animal,why different criteria according to movies?And yes this youtuber Shan Prasher also criticize negative aspects of animal and appreciate positive aspects also,but the way druv calls rapist to fans of gore, slasher,action genre movies is pure hypocrisy, it's everyone personal choice to see and love movies .You can't judge the character of person by choices of movie.And yes I also criticize negative aspects of animal but degrading the whole movie for your own judgement is definitely not acceptable,and yes if you have valid counter argument then reply me I will definitely reply you. 5:24 5:24
@@msredcurtainswhy he should prove anything he is not calling animal great social changer movie Dhruv rathee should prove that just like animal gangs of wassepur sacred games breaking bad etc are not a cancer to society Whoever pays him money then that movie is great & when he is not paid for review that movie becomes cancer for the society You are so dumb you didnt get the gist of the whole video Its about hypocrisy
@@aryagaonkar2161i agree to some of shans point but shan also misrepresented few of the things, when he tryna expose dhruv hypocrisy like misrepresentation of death note anime
Outstanding Shan! You're truly remarkable! You conveyed it perfectly when you mentioned that when some men realize they can't attain alpha or sigma status, they resort to labelling them as toxic misogynist. I’m pretty sure if someone bothers Dhruv’s sister, unlike Ranbir Kapoor, Dhruv will run to Kejriwal. And then all Kejriwal gonna say is, “aJi iski toh jhanch honi chahiye, sab mile huye hain”😂😂😂 Bloody losers!
Dhruv Rathee may be wrong but the movie Animal is utterly illogical and what’s more concerning than the movie is that the character of Ranbir is being celebrated among youth who will go to any limits to defend and justify the actions of the senseless character.
"Ranbir is being celebrated among youth who will go to any limits to defend and justify the actions of the senseless character" that may be true, but this does not make the film itself toxic. I can paint the most beautiful girl in the world, but if a guy jacks off to that painting its not my art that at fault, it's the perception of my art in the mind of a backwards audience. Animal is made for mature audiences, and it should be judged that way. If the general Indian audience watches 'taxi driver' and tries to kill people to fix the world, that is not the movies fault, it is the audience that lacks maturity. Anything illogical in this movie also exists in many other Bollywood movies, but specifically nit picking this movie for those points because you disagree with the impact it's making is deceptive. Instead of telling sensible people to not watch this movie, maybe there should be an effort to teach people what to actually conclude from this movie....Not to behave like an Animal, that is Ranbir Kapoor in this movie.
@@1596bin I’m not nit picking Animal at all. Most of the recent Bollywood movies are subpar in terms of logic, Animal being the worst. And let’s not compare Taxi Driver, a cult classic, with this “cringe fest”. I respect your opinion- you liked Animal. But I didn’t. Let’s just leave it at that.
@@ashishbehera1150 That is true...you have as much right to dislike this movie as I have to like it Also just to clarify, I was not trying to compare Taxi driver as a film to Animal, but the idea of how it's about a frustrated man that resorts to violence. And in the eyes of a wrong audience this can also create a toxic response. But yes, agree to disagree about the movie 👍
I don't agree with the point that films don't change a society or don't have an impact on a society. If that would have been the case then govt. would not have been hellbent in censoring certain movies.
Especially the Indian society, we Indians are movie obsessed people, star obsessed people. Youngsters blindly follow their movie idols. We watch so many movies that they leave a subconscious effect on us, ppl r just too ignorant to accept it. They r talking about active and immediate effects which is a rare case of course, but not talking about the long run effect on psychology.
He may have called out some points in Dhruv’s video, but to negate Dhruv’s argument, he would need to prove that animal is not a cancer for society, but in fact good for society. He hasn’t been able to prove that, nor establish that, and just keeps rambling on like an idiot. 🤐
Most Sensible replies that Dhruv Rathee fans have when someone criticise him😂 1: "ANdBhakT" 2: "ThAtS wHy eEucaTiOn iS imPortaNt" 3:"He Is moRE edUCatEd thaN you " 4: "hE AlwayS sAys TruTh" 5: " WhAtSApP UniVErciTy faCts"
When dhruv released that video, I truly self questioned my own choice of liking Animal movie. I was thinking, is my mentality going downwards? Do I like crime? Thanks to Shan bhai for making this video and making me believe that no matter what anyone says or want to force any narrative on me, I wouldn't get underneath next time of anyone. I'll honestly question everything and then make choice of own for liking or not. Shoutout to Shan bhai❤❤
@@suhaib5941 look we make our opinions based on our surroundings, childhood, and then what we see, what we read so if dhruv will counter all points of this video with the valid reasons, I'll accept it happily.
U are absolutely correct…Dont know how UA-camrs can take fat cheques and so blatantly lie to the audience who give them their livelihood.. he should be shown that audience have brains and cannot be manipulated..
He may have called out some points in Dhruv’s video, but to negate Dhruv’s argument, he would need to prove that animal is not a cancer for society, but in fact good for society. He hasn’t been able to prove that, nor establish that, and just keeps rambling on like an idiot. 🤐
@@msredcurtains Animal is not cancer for society, you are accountable for what you do not the movie makers. It has been marketed in a way that alerts people to keep their children away from this movie. And stop spamming everywhere lil bro
@@Krep336 sure responsibility should be on an individual rather than a collective, because humans are not social beings. You are so right. Next to shock audience, if filmmakers start putting out snuff films, that would be okay too. Creative liberty and individual responsibility and all. You make such good points.
Manoj Sir once said that, we as people / audience can’t dictate whether such a film should be made or not. Censor board is there for that part. And if you don’t like “such” films, don’t go and watch it. Simple. An artist doesn’t owe anything to the society, to public. And it’s not an artist’s job to give “message” in his/ her work. Rajamouli sir once said that his job is to ENTERTAIN public, and not to PREACH them.
@@shishirtrivedi3668 If movie stories is nonsense ( nothing ) Why not critics will criticise. Critics or criticism writers are much more relavent than story less filmmakers.
This video is actually good Shan .. Even I liked the movie Animal - for the acting, direction, bgm and hall experience. That's it. I am not taking any toxicity shown in the movie to my home or letting any negativity shown , hamper my way of thinking or behaving.
there is a study which shows how after Kabir Singh smoking habits increased in youth in India, yes movies change the way people behave in country like India where youth worship the hero,
Animal movie Toxic hai q k violence glorified hai aur GOW is not glorifying violence on top climax mein yeh bhi bataya Jata hai violence k anjaan kia hai . But movies like Animal, KGF are giving rise to anti heroism On top Manoj sir has said that movies don't change society but changes your style.. you see jaab har bande ka style change hojayga then one day society will start accepting bad things as norm.. I am not saying all movies are bad but ek time ta jaab bade Kuch kehtete then we use to respect it but this days har Banda Apne mein ek hero hai.. from where they this attitude..
Dhruv rathee : -Gets paid for promoting one-sided agenda in politics -Gets paid for promoting one-sided agenda in movie Very chalakh bro very chalakh😂😂
For you all if you think movies doesn't effect our society so listen When I watched Padman I started to talk about periods and When I watched Mission Mangal I got motivated for space science and result Now I am here in IISC Bangalore to pursue my bachelor in Physics major.
@@tech_report_0868 I don't know what I should write to you all . But sometimes I feel it's not your fault because your family never teach you how to control the content you watch. I think they never had any parental control on you. That's why you came to support such a toxic and violent movie
@@Yashyadav-ib3he Another BS comment when you can't refute the point. Haven't even watched Animal. Also , maybe your parents should've taught you self control and critical thinking capabilities , well , you could've developed these yourself if your parents would've provided some autonomy in your life , which definitely doesn't seem the case as you can be so easily manipulated. Classic case of controlling parents. Don't blame them though, it could be generational trauma too , who knows , maybe they got manipulated into doing something wrong too considering how easily manipulative you are. Oh , "Parents never controlled what you watch" , yes , unlike your parents when I reached a certain age , they decided to stop controlling the content that I watch , because my parents TRUST me. Maybe try instilling a sense of trust in your parents , they'd probably stop controlling you & your content too.
@@tech_report_0868 It's possible but it depends on me if I am going to watch that or not . Because I really respect my mind, it is not dustbin to fill negative thoughts
no wonder we always try to put personal comments on their personal life of the people who are in public life. let it be mr. pawan kalyan in AP or any one else we are habituated for a long time . dont worry the attempt to change has begun, manzil door nahi hai bhai
My man! 🙌Once again putting in the time and effort to put forward a coherent discourse. I have never seen Shan presenting an opinion to his audience without the supporting arguments based on sound reasoning. Kamal!
Shan Prasher Aapne toh Dhruv ko attack kiya. How did you prove that Animal itself is not a cancer movie? You achieved basically nothing with this dumb video. Sure, you’ve called out Dhruv. But you haven’t yet established that this movie is not cancer. Prove that this movie is good for society, not a cancer, then you’ll be worth time. Otherwise you’re just trying really hard to sound smart.
@@msredcurtainsthe motive of this video is to call out Dhruv rathee on his Hypocrisy and biased review just because the movie Dosent fits his ideology. Criticising the movie isn't bad at all but Rathi ji even indirectly said that the people that like the film are mentally ret@rd or have same mindset as r@pists? How is that justified mister
@@sam_1912 the message I got from Dhruv’s video is that exposure to content like this can change the mindset of a person, and society as a whole. That what you consume affects you. I’m not commenting about the presentation of Dhruv, only the message of the video, and that’s what I understand. If there is some other message you’ve gathered, specifically that anyone who has watched the movie is already a retard or rapist, would help me if you can share those quotes from the original video. Thank you
@@msredcurtains He didn't say that rapist thing directly, I said it that he said it indirectly which shan in his video has explained quite well how he did it. I'll answer the other questions later, first I want you to answer that there are many movies and series all around OTT platforms which are more notorious, more misogynistic compared to animal, more gore violence and some of which even Rathi ji has even termed as cult classics (Gang of wasseypur, sacred games, mirzapur, breaking bad, four more shots, thank you for coming and so so many other shows whether it be Bolly/Holly), and it's not like these are not well known..most people know these and watch and because of OTT these series are open to teenagers like Munnu also who also has access to porn even though it is banned, we can't blame the movies for that. So my question is WHY IS ONLY ANIMAL DEEMED AS CANCER, who now all of a sudden so much hate (cause even Rathi ji is just blatantly hating on this not even knowing the full thing just soo biased). If a movie is bad it should definitely be called out and all but it's just not understandable how only Animal is bearing this. Bolna hai to sabko bolo warna jo ideology mein fit na ho usko nahi SIMPLE.
I felt the same way watching Druv's video because I clearly remembered him promoting these other such violent movies with Netflix. And yes, I agree with Manoj sir that movies just influence a hairstyle, not people's personality. Thank you for this well spoken video. ❤ People need to stop imaging children watching and thinking what will be the impact on their mind because this movie isnt for kids. 😂
hey, are you sure films don't change people's mindset and thoughts 🤔 I think films change mindset if you like any movie and decided to change your hairstyle your mindset also will be change according to the movie... after watching wasepur people started repeating its dialog publicly and that was abusive words.. the 3rd class language that youth used on a daily basis comes from movies only !! larki pata lenge types of words they learn from movies.. love story type Bollywood movies directly change our society
People need to rewatch what Dhruv said and what this guy is saying line by line and you guys will find out this guy just opposed for the sake of it, not at all been able to prove Dhruv wrong. :P
Regarding change of mindset through movie/series, the best example is fake feminism promoted in the series like 4 more shots, made in heaven etc etc. and people are getting influenced by these movies/series.
@@No_One1231 you are absolutely right, if you remember kerela story movie.. because of this movie people started arguing and even fighting for Hindu Muslim community and the movie was so popular that's why it dubbed in all languages.. The BJP party was promoting this movie like their own house movie .. each and every popular movie affects our society and mindsets very effectively it's 💯% sure
No, shan you didn't call out animal with equal intensity as you have called out thank you for coming and other films. You justified ranbir's character by saying that he was saving his sister . But you didn't realise he brought a gun in college and even fired it.
@@mariapauline8732 because acc to him only toxic feminism based movies affects society not toxic masculinity movies ? bro literally mai 18 19 saal ke bacho ko padhata bhi hoon unhone jab kaha ki achi film toh hai sir Ill tell them ask me same question after some years and as a teacher I admire professor vikas divyakirti sir who said "films like animal take our society 10 years back"
@@HimanshuRanjan-zb2rv very true, in the end if they showed that Ranbir is bad n he learnt lesson what he did he is not right then still I can accept but showing a man should be like this, it effects the boys mentality
Finally someone logical and entertaining at the same time giving counter relpy to biased video of Dhruv which he is doing from long time Well done Shan bhai keep going 👏
first time here watching you videos and super impressed! every point you put forth hits in every angle and totally in love with your conclusion. I loved watching Animal but at the same time I hate toxicity in real life and stay miles away from it!
This guy used all different narratives to counter and is very different to what Dhruv said. His viewers should be smart to understand what I am saying.
Most Sensible replies that Dhruv Rathee fans have when someone criticise him😂 1: "ANdBhakT" 2: "ThAtS wHy eEucaTiOn iS imPortaNt" 3:"He Is moRE edUCatEd thaN you " 4: "hE AlwayS sAys TruTh" 5: " WhAtSApP UniVErciTy faCts"
Indeed, and Animal movie was not glorifying anything... Ranbir's character lost almost everything in his life and his actions led to the rise of his psychotic double
Shan Prasher ji. Aapne toh Dhruv ko attack kiya. How did you prove that Animal itself is not a cancer movie? You achieved basically nothing with this dumb video. Sure, you’ve called out Dhruv. But you haven’t yet established that this movie is not cancer. Lagatar dumb videos aa rahi hain from you. If I said, you keep posting these body building photos even though you would never qualify as a professional body builder. Does that help to negate your dumb argument? No. So however Dhruv has presented his video, his argument is that the movie is cancer. You’re attacking his presentation and past videos, but you haven’t been able to make any negating statement about his argument itself yet. Prove that this movie is good for society, not a cancer, then you’ll be worth time. Even though Dhruv’s video is not perfect, you’ve got nothing on him. Screaming loud on the screen doesn’t make you smart sorry.
The problem with dhruv is he is misinterpreting facts...he is comparing rapists and misogynistic people with the one who watch these cult classic films...one of dhruv rathee viewers was female and dhruv rathee made her believe that all people in that theatre who are wooing and cheering are the one who likes to rape Or like to do extreme misogyny
Now this is what we call a totally unbiased video hats off to you sir. For my personal opinion I liked animal movie as an entertainment as we all should look at it just like entertainment. and not as something we should be taking inspiration from. If any person lives their life based on some movie character then they should really reflect and get mature enough to be able to seperate reality from fantasy
So accurate and so good. Thank you so much for creating such well researched video bcz it’s so sad tht people like dhruv just like to force their opinions on people.
Why people still watching his propaganda videos ? He has been exposed numerous time for giving biased facts from Leftist news articles. We Indians have a problem where we see Veed or "crowd" we go to that shop. German Shepard is just using that mindset of Indians. I always cross check information after watching something & i could not stand his Leftist biased videos stopped watching his videos for 4 years, moreover he claims he is unbiased , at least he should be honest with his audience
There is a difference between portrayal of violence in Anurag Kashyap films and Sandeep's films. Anurag depicts it while Sandeep celebrates it. There is crude violence and then there is sensational violence. I have childhood friends who never got the privilege of getting good education, when you hear their opinion and see how they idolize Ranbir's character, you'll get to know where the problem lies and why Dhruv's arguments are logical to a great extent.
And you can only blame the director in this context because if not everyone, people are going to idolize a person who "Protects his family" at any cost, rides a private jet and fires machine guns. Not everyone has the intellectual ability to maturely understand problematic plots. They end up subscribing to a wrong ideology which will reflect in their actions at micro levels.
@@Underdogayush I have, he is absolutely right. You are 'fools' for not understanding the difference between these movies. Anurag's movies show the reality and never promotes violence. As the writer of this comment rightly said violence isn't celebrated in his movies. Where as in animal violence has been glorified.
@@marcosurvivalist7266 Remember the machine gun scene background music? Remember the scene where Ranbir walks out naked? It celebrates violence the same way few punjabi songs promote gun violence. The difference is subtle yet polarizes viewers so much so that they start taking offence when something is said against the film.
We live in an era where Munnu can watch BDSM porn in 4K UHD resolution. This film is peanut compared to that. Needless to say Germany, The Netherlands was porn capital once upon a time.
Watched the movie a couple of days ago and I just can't fathom why some people are bashing it for no reason. I loved it SO MUCH. Brilliantly written and executed story about an unhinged main character. It doesn't justify ANYTHING from Ranvijay's character and all of his negative actions have some ramifications or consequences. Geetanjali's brilliant monologue calling him out for his toxic behaviours and her slapping Ranvijay multiple times made it absolutely perfect and showed that the script is not glorifying any of his actions.
@k_t8042 sorry, but I disagree with you. Cos he is the one who calls out the propoangandas, and most of his videos are informational and educational. Here Shan rightly pointed out his dubious review. And I am just a fan of Dhruv as I am of Shan, but not a blind follower of anyone Anyways, we all are entitled to our opinions and I respect your's
sorry bro/mam, i disagree with you. Mr. Rathee videos are only other side of the coin. Always Mr. Arnab Goswami cannot be right. only because he shouts louder , heis argumets are ONLY THE TRUTH. I have the basic right to keep my opinion , so mr Rathee has. Dissent is te basic right of Democracy , whic unfortunately has been in oblivion for some time .
Hey Shan, I have been watching you for years..much before your individual channel :) Have always enjoyed your reviews so much so that, before investing 2-3 hours in a movie, I first watch your review. Not only you critically analyse different aspects of content but also you convey in a fun way. Loved it how you called out and ambushed selective analysis of any person including Dhruv here this time. Loved your family pic on insta...sending love to your daughter ❤ Always a fan 😊
Hello Shantanu bro... I have been following your videos since your old famous Honest Reviews. And I'm inspired by you to review movies and series. You have always been one of my go-to creators. Love your analysis and points. Also I agree with your opinions time and time again. Keep posting videos and keep inspiring people like me.
People's capacity for independent thought seems obscured, as evidenced by the gathering of seemingly mindless followers around Dhruv Rathee. His videos, staunchly one-sided, meticulously disseminate a carefully curated agenda that is ingested without question by his devoted audience. Your valiance and courage is commendable Shan 🙌 Thank you for sharing a dissenting perspective I know this will inevitably draw the ire of his zealous followers, who, like a brigade, are poised to inundate the comments section with disparagement. It is a perplexing phenomenon, the sway one person can hold over others, guiding them down a path of unquestioning adherence, even when the narrative presented is heavily skewed.
Couldn't agree more brother.. not just this video but most of dhruv rathee's videos are staunchly one sided and full of cherry picked facts which supports his agenda, on top of that he presents his videos in such a way that a regular viewer of his channel would say that dhruv is totally neutral and is just presenting facts but in reality it's the opposite.
He may have called out some points in Dhruv’s video, but to negate Dhruv’s argument, he would need to prove that animal is not a cancer for society, but in fact good for society. He hasn’t been able to prove that, nor establish that, and just keeps rambling on like an idiot. 🤐
The video of Dhruvs on animal movie was the first time I disagreed. "Movies should be taken as a movie not reality". One sided perceptions is always wrong perspective.
If u intelligent, u will understand, almost every video he make is paid to cater to a particular audience which is already biased and opinionated abt a certain topic. The rythemic way in which he speaks and everything that parashar pointed out. If anybody thinks its just abt animal movie review must be kidding himself
Shan Prasher Aapne toh Dhruv ko attack kiya. How did you prove that Animal itself is not a cancer movie? You achieved basically nothing with this dumb video. Sure, you’ve called out Dhruv. But you haven’t yet established that this movie is not cancer. Prove that this movie is good for society, not a cancer, then you’ll be worth time. Otherwise you’re just trying really hard to sound smart.
@@msredcurtains At first only he said that he is not going to take any side or will he defame Dhruv.. And I also said "slap on hypocrisy not Dhruv.." So I hope you got the answer? It is nothing personal bro.. Take care
@@msredcurtains You want a proof that animal is good for scoiety, Then read this 1) Even if Ranbir kapoor had e terrible relationship with his father in this film, As and when he came to know about the attempt to murder of his father, He left everything and came to him. 2) Ranbir slept with tripti dimri in this film and rashmika was not aware about it. Still he told her that thing, and left Tripti dimri with respect that she can go anywhere . 3) If you have seen ranbir with his child, He has treated him with all love and care that means he has not passed the same experience to his son which he has felt in his childhood. 4) And last, If you think Revenge taken by ranbir was wrong, then let me remind you how our judicial system is strong enough to punish the real criminals.
He may have called out some points in Dhruv’s video, but to negate Dhruv’s argument, he would need to prove that animal is not a cancer for society, but in fact good for society. He hasn’t been able to prove that, nor establish that, and just keeps rambling on like an idiot. 🤐
@@msredcurtains he doesn't said that animal is not toxic movie it is but it does not effect the society simple is that if it was then gangs of wasipur and scared games are more extreme than animal in which he has appreciated them due to paid collaboration
Not sure, about this but it definitely left a worse impression on teenagers watching this movie. I won't advise people below 25 who are not mature enough to watch this movie. This might influence decision making and normalize this behaviour by actors as okay for our society
Dhruv Rathee didn't like violence and message used in Animal but for sure he definitely liked Game of Thrones and squid games kind of movies cuz those movies or series are in foreign languages and that is cool according to him...
He never said that.Those were reality of those times.this is created with plot.also this is celebrating anti heroism and this should only be watched by adults but here teenagers and kids watch
Tbh....Game of Thrones is way different (and way better) than animal....both have violence but one glorifies it and one doesn't....there ain't no regret in Ranveer Kapoor's character....to a certain point the violence was justifiable but then it crossed the limits.... especially with the womanizing part.... Game of Thrones is on a totally different arc
Just imagine Animal starts streaming on Netflix and Netflix calls Dhruv to review the Film.
Oops 🫢
Moi moi ho jayega
he will promote it... he is such kind of shameless
It is on Netflix now
He'll reject it any of cost❤️🔥
Coming from a Dhruv rathee subscriber, this is a well researched and unbaised reply... Well done Shan..
Bow Bow gang !!
@@purpleblackberries6850 Not all films are made as reflection of society😂. Films take huggggge creative liberty thus making them fictious. Sabse ameer aadmi ko goli lage na toh Desh ki saree police udhar lg jaygi, aur poore film mein ek bhi police nhi hai, 1 of the many facts that prove this film is nowhere reflection of society
I have seen both videos , and both are biased. Both have done well researched and point out their Targeted portion.
Dhruv Pick up Munnu and went through his oife time journey, he didn't say that munnu watch this film
But he said munnu face some similar incidents in his child life then as a adult he watch this film , that create an impact on his mind.
Yes some people don't influence but some people influence by elvish yadav as well.
Shan can't guarantee that no one influenced by ANIMAL.
Dhruv Rathi's narrative was more right because he also said that
Some people only may influence but it create a big impact as a part of domino effect,
If 10cr people will watch the movie and 0.0025% people influenced then the number is 2500
Out of them 10% will start crime then it's 250 criminals.
So both are right in their opinion
Shan is talking about remain 9.999 cr
Dhruv is talking about that 2500
Dhruv should say something on
Toxic feminism movies/series like
4 more shots
Tnx for coming
dear zindagi
Made in haven
jee karda
lipstick under
virgin vanupria
bobby begum
You should be ashamed of your existence for subscribing to one of the delutarded youtubers. Shame...shame ....shame
Edit: Add some value to your life by doing something useful
Since i saw dhruvs video, i knew his opinion was one sided and biased but the way u broke down his narrative and psychology behind is very detailed. Well done!
Same here
Dhruv rathee is a beta male. His gf probly seeks other men for satisfaction and is with the German leprosy patient only for money.
I live in his district in Haryana. Almost everyone knows here that Dhruv Rathee's mother is a red light district worker.
If anyone wants I can prove it by providing her services.
Since rathee got famous, her rates have gone up.
Damn true!! Dhruv needs to watch this
Not just movie reviews all the videos related politics also highly biased,
@@bullishboi u meant biased?
Dhruv Rathee clearly stated violence and evil characters should be shown in a particular way and not in a heroic way. There is no redemption in Animal movie or Kabir Singh, they remain hero till the end which is why it makes it toxic. Dirty picture is dirty too but Vidya balan is not shown in a good light. No body will be inspired by what she played on screen bcoz the grey lines was reflected subtly through the movie.So good and evil characters need to have it's own consequences. We should not glamorize toxic characters that's what Dhruv said.
have you even seen those 2 movies, if yes then i can't say anything coz you're dumb. and dont watch something which you cant digest
In gangs of wasseypur, sardar Khan and Faisal are shown in a heroic way. Thousands of reels copied from their dialogue
@@castelessaastik4655 but by the end, they suffer due to this attitude and actions as well. Sardar Khan dies, Faizal Khan cried in a scene saying" I never wanted to get involved in this" and was killed by his own step brother. Nagma was killed, Durga betrayed Sardar. Ramadhir was killed by Faizal. They all suffered in the end
@@Mkeyline_112 I see reels on disgusting dialogues from mirzapur
@@Mkeyline_112 Didn't Ranvijay Singh suffer in the end? His whole body got damaged. His sense of taste/smell vanished. His sister is widow now. 2 of his brothers got killed by Aziz. His wife left him. His dad jiske liye vo itna pagal tha, pata chalta hai he is diagnosed with cancer and only few months are left until he is dead. His whole family has been destroyed. To add more to that, there is Aziz now who has cloned Ranvijay's face and now burning in fire of revenge and is ready to destory his whole lineage and wants to capture Swastik Enterprises. He used to feel bad about his father not giving enough time to him. But eventually vo bhi aisa hi baap ban gaya hai end me jo apni family ko zara sa bhi time nahi de raha hai. Itna suffer karna kaafi nahi hai tunhare liye.
Dhruv bhai is absolutrely right I watched Cars movie as a kid and now I'm a car vroom vroom !!!
😂
😂😂😂😂
😂😂
😂😂😂
I'm also influenced by Stuart little, now I'm a mouse😢
Absolutely logical and a good reply to his hypocrite and one sided narrative
lol from begining he always gives onesided narrative only...Dhruv rathi is like a 'baba' for todays kids living in gated societies.
He dresses in modern clothing and gives an illusion to its listeners of being part of some 'factual crowd'.....and 'different than rest of population'.
Bhai yeh bh0s@riwa@la bhi uski friendly gang mein hi hain😂😂, isko pro-hindu stance se jo popularity mili, usko encash karna chahta hain
as if Shan didn't make a one-sided biased review in the first place.
@@malehachowdhury5614 difference is ppl who watch Shan's video arent like Dhruv's cult.....where they treat every word spoken by their 'messiah of facts'...as ultimate truth
Logical nhi
Logical fallacy 😂
Dhruv Rathee is the same Guy who Loved BREAKING BAD. 🤡
He loves gangs of wasseypur too
@@suhaib5941 then comparing Animal to Toxicity is also a biggest Joke.
Breaking bad n gangs of wassepur movie is not glorifies lead character at all.
@@atheist1586 LOL really dude ? The BGM was playing Jeeya ho bihar ke lala when Manoj bajpai character was dying in Part 1. Also in Breaking Bad, they turned skyler into a hated wife character to make the fans side with Walter and then they turned Jesse Pinkman into babyface to turn him into a villain. Full Glorification
@@atheist1586 Abe chutiye kuch toh sense bana le aapne baaton ki
But I'm disagree with that point says films don't change society. These things happen gradually so you can't see but if you analysis you can see
Really film doesn't change the society, agr aisa hota to money heist dekhkr sb chori krne lgte , Spiderman dekhkr sab building se kudte.. pr logo ko reality pta hoti h kya Krna h ky nhi.m wo just entertainment ka jariya h
bhai agar society change ho jaati movies se then koi bhi student suicide nhi karta chhichore, 3 idiots dekhne ke baad
@@2kdwalapro254 logo ne chori ki hai dude money heist se inspiration leke. Check your facts
@@Anmoluserhow do you know ki kitne logo ne apna de decesion change kar diya. Will they come out and say ki I watched 3 idiots and it changed my decision of not taking my life? Dude these things happens on personal level
@@iklokesh19 bro mere kehne ka mtlb tha ki agar movies se inspire log hone lagte toh chhichore jaisi movies dekhne ke baad at least suicide rate kam toh hota but last year hi dekh lo aur ek baat batao koi bilkul seedha saadha insaan movie dekh ke gangster ban sakta hai kya??? nhi na sirf wahi log criminal ban sakte hai movies dekh ke jinki thought process hi criminals ki tarah hai jis insaan ki soch criminal ki tarah hai woh kisi bhi cheez se inspire hoke crime kar sakta hai tum jo chori ka bata rhe ho money heist se toh jin logon ne chori ki unke dimaag mei hi chori karne waali baatein ghumti rehti hongi uss series se toh unhe push mila tha aur aisa push kahin se bhi mil sakta hai newspapers se, articles se, novels se toh kya inn sab ko bhi band karwa de???
-Wife and kid left him
- Father is about to die
- Almost half of bones in his body are broken
- A psycho is after him to Butcher his family
Without being sympathetic vanga is shown how every action has consequences. He didn't justify any of his act.
Absolutely. Great points.
Yes but there are people who r defending the character. They are soo ignorant about the fact that Ranbir character is problematic. It's the audience that are defending the characters and those who are pointing out the wrong things that shown in the movie are said that they are fake feminist. Seriously people need to grow up
@@shreyaranjan400non of this feminist shows this point that bro share they actually called Sandeep vanga biggot mysoginy or woman abuser that's why they are feminist God just forgot to give brain to them 😂😂
But the character of Vijay didn't have any redemption arc despite suffering the consequences. That's why it's wrong. Because, the movie glorifies it.
Exactly....nd same was with kabir singh...reddy very cleverly shows that his charatrs have flaws nd because of these flaws his charactrs face terrible consequences...in kabir singh literally his license was revoked in the end...people just dont get this
Dhruv Rathee always does this "half truth" videos. Thank you for exposing him.
🤡🤡🤡🤡
Correct
truth is nothing but perspective.
@@The_coding111Aah look darbaari andhnamazis are seething here already 😂😂
@@ammygaming2817nope. Truth is truth. Perspective changes the perception of the truth, but it remains what it is.
I wish Dhruv could make a similar video about the toxicity in series and movies like 'Thank you for coming' and 'Four more shots' but we all know he won't since it doesn't fit on his political ideology
Yes
@@rocky3850woh isliye hit nhi hui kyunki un series ki koi story hi nhi hai.
@@rocky3850 n there u went wrong. Boys knows the animal character where he is wrong or right. Jaise Neha dhupia ki baat me akalmand ladkiya agree nhi kra tha to yaha ladke galat ko promote nhi kr rhe they just enjoying the mass action, stylish movie n coolness that's it. I'm being a girl, a wife too ,loved this movie. Jahan galat laga wo galat laga jahan accha lga wo accha laga. That's it finished kuch nhi uske baad. Baat itna bhadhana kyu. Film dekh liya bs utna hi uspe itna sochna kyu. Ab jo jayda sochega wo insaan hi problematic hai. Usse har dusre teesre film me influence hona hoga.
@@rocky3850log logically sahi aur galat me frk jaante h, sbko pta h murder, khoon khraaba glt h. To kyu gyaan chodna
I don't think anybody even watches this shit shows n movies..
I am not a Dhruv Rathee supporter, but I feel Shan, it’s very important to point out here, that I’m gangs of Wasseypur or sacred games, there is no visual grammar of glorification, which is present in animal. I felt that the visual grammar of animal, be it background music or writing, it’s very important to note that there is no redemption arc, there is no morality, and I felt very uncomfortable when people in the theatre are whistling and shouting for the abusive scenes.
yes..but Anurag kashyap himself has praised Sandeep Vanga & Animal recently,even calling Sandeep a "mis-understood" director..🤣🤣😂
@soultune908 💯 😂
You need to become strong that's all I would say. People laugh on Men Abuse jokes too. That time did u think all those ?? It's a movie and people were supposed to react like that. Then according to you, Dark humour shouldn't exist.
I agree , they were doing something wrong , they were the anti hero , we do support them , but in our minds we know they made some bad decision, some terrible circumstances, thing go wrong
But in case of animal , all of this is shown as giga chad behaviour
@KratosMessi-eo1yl dude. I’m talking about glorifying domestic violence. He’s literally abusing his wife, and people in the theatre are clapping and cheering. Is this a representation of masculinity?!
This is the response i was expecting when i watched dhruv videos .....hats off man you did this very tastefully👑
Same
Yes bro
Sadly Dhruv's Video has 8 million views and this video will hardly get a few 100 thousand views.. we need to push such videos highlighting bias and hypocrisy of so called influencers like Dhruv Rathee
so true share it on reels part wise it has wider reach every one
So true...pathan acchi nhi thi
Bs usse itna support iss liye mila kyuki usme srk tha aur wo M u s... h
If ajay,or akshay would hv been the lead in that movie
phir yahi dhruv jaise uska mzak bnate
I don't agree with Prateek Borade's views nor do I agree with Dhruv Rathee.. both are very polarizing.. Be on a neutral ground guys
I m sure most of his followers are just purchased bots lol
Some mad guy made a stupid movie and i see people fighting between each other for that movie. This samosa youtuber made a video just as an answer to another fellow UA-camr. Shame on you. Dhruv rathe doesnot care, he doesn’t have time to answer to this cheap people
Bro destroyed German Shepherd single handedly😂
Lol 😂
Right
In the end, there is no cure for CRINGE........but some people don't understand that GOW is a well-made film and Animal is CRINGE!!!!
Does it matter, people don't go to movies to watch well-made films, they go to enjoy. Fight scene were cool, Tripti was looking sexy, songs were good. Acting performance were top norch, not all but many comedic punches were landed.
Thank you shan Bhai. It's needed he always gives byest reviews. Thank you for call out karne ke liye. Keep Doing good work.😊
Shan bhai nailed it❤.
What dhruv said is actually true and I support him because i watched power rangers and now i am red ranger❤😎
Ha ha 😅😂
Why not white ranger , he was op
@@vivekkparashar White ranger of dino thunder was my fav 😁
ABE SALE😂
Good One😂
Films don't influence a society; the society influences films. A film is a reflection of the society. One can choose to moan over the bad reflection or not even look at it. But the image remains whether you wish to accept it or not.
Films can never change the moral values of a person as they depend on his/her upbringing and education. I've watched countless films with extremely problematic lead characters but I've never even thought of copying them. I see them as troubled individuals that need help. They serve as a reminder of what not to become in life.
If someone becomes morally corrupt just by watching a few films, there is a serious issue with the individual's upbringing, social circle or education.
If films had such a huge influence on people, why haven't most people embraced progressive agendas and revolutionary ideas?
Critics shouldn't burden films with their own morality. A film can be whatever it's maker wants it to be.
Spoken like a True Nationalist
Jai Siya Ram
Most logical person here. Kudos to you man🙏
Its both ways...you must have heard ,criminals doing crime ..inspired by movie scene..
Just get a research on how many drisyam model crimes were reported in last few years😐
miya gaalib aapko milte hai 8/10 essay writing mai
I love the payment portion the most. How mockingly he tells about Dhruv's payment 😂
Very logical and sensible reply, my respect for Shan is 10x now for calling dhruv on such a gaslighting video
Dhruv rathee is a beta male. His gf probly seeks other men for satisfaction and is with the German leprosy patient only for money.
I live in his district in Haryana. Almost everyone knows here that Dhruv Rathee's mother is a red light district worker.
If anyone wants I can prove it by providing her services.
Since rathee got famous, her rates have gone up.
Well, 0*100 = 0
Just say you love bjp we can clearly understand your emotions 😊
100 % logic video. Well done shan. Dhruv can't defend this logical video 😅
Isiliye uske "education is important" wale bots ni h yha😂
@@thelonewarrior1849 Bhai yahi mai kehne bale tha sale uske bots khud to gwaar hote hai orr Bolte hai education is important
Chutiya
@@thelonewarrior1849 😂😂
If any sensible or logical person watches SRV movies, you know the main character is always the real villain of the story. I was more scared of RANVIJAY than ABRAR in ANIMAL
Exactly! Idk how were people not able to see this in the movie, Ranvijay was literally screaming through the screen that he's problematic.
That's why this movie name is "Animal"
People who defending animal saying its just a movie should have kept their mouth shut while they were trying to boycott PK and padmawati movie. If you saying movie hei kuch bhi chalega then you should keep that mindset for all movie, not just selective movies 😂, isse 1000x accha hei sam bahadur.
Kya hai Sam bahadur mein 😂😂😂... average and non toxic films are not masterpieces
Animal is totally worth the ticket price and I go to multiplex to be entertained and engaged nd not learn social values😂😂
Ab aayenge "that's why education is important" wale 🤣🤣
That's why education is important 😌
At the End, nowadays 18+ Indian viewers are smart enough to understand what to see and what to consume !! 🙂
Really😅😮😮😮
Not everyone but some are
@@MoinKhan-uf4pgI think the general population is sane enough to know what's reality and what's fiction.
Thats why dhruv tatti is viewd by so many
@@MoinKhan-uf4pgyou might not be , but most of us are
This is the bestest video of yours till date.. brilliantly explained..
That's like an educated boy, with no fake narrative and propoganda..full support to you shan brother..👍
Exactly bro...He has always surpassed himself ❤..
Shan Prasher Aapne toh Dhruv ko attack kiya. How did you prove that Animal itself is not a cancer movie? You achieved basically nothing with this dumb video. Sure, you’ve called out Dhruv. But you haven’t yet established that this movie is not cancer.
Prove that this movie is good for society, not a cancer, then you’ll be worth time. Otherwise you’re just trying really hard to sound smart.
@@msredcurtains Abe chomu usne kabhi nahi bola yeh movie good hai society keliye aur dusri baat tere jaise kamzor mindset wale itna hi influence ho jaate hai toh movies dekhna chod de tu phir jitne dhruv rathee ne acha review diya ganga of wasseypur sacred games jaisi woh konsa good hai society
@@thegameking3931 so are you a disrespectful person inherently or did you get influenced by these movies to be disrespectful? Neither should make you proud. Chomu it seems, speak for yourself bro.
@@msredcurtains Abe chomu sabko apne tarah samjha hai kya tune Jo koi bhi movies dekhe influence ho jaata hai itna bada gawar nahi hu shyad tere surrounding ke honge aur tu movies dekhna chod de Indian movies se influence hojayega toh Hollywood movies tujhe dekhne bhi nahi chahiye. Jaha baat influence ki toh meine Indian movies dekhi bhi nahi hai 2 3 saal se toh tere point invalid hai aur tujhe kyu lagta movie dekhna kuch proud jaisa hai gochu chomu tu hai aur rahega
Dhruv was saying ki movies aesi banni chahiye ki jisne violence ko glamorise na Kiya jaaye , he meant ki Jo khoon karaba kar Raha hai use galat dikhana chahiye, jo women par control karta hai, use galat dikhana chahiye, but animal me aesa karne Wale ko hero dikhaya gya hai, tum logo ko samajh aana chahiye ki the message that he gave while criticising animal were all correct,
Agreed. He was sure to make this point. That movies can be violent but they shouldn't be glorified
Bhai ambani tumhe car she udda me chala jayega to tumhe justice milega? Esha sochna bhi joke hai 😂
Logo ko false hope kiyu de?
After watching Rathi ji ka video I was judging myself 😂😂 I was like something is wrong with me but thanks to you I feel relieved
Tu khud chutiye hai kyoki tu dusre par bharosa karta hai😅
We are the same bro 😂
Shame on u no wonder our india is filled with pappus and andbhakts use ur brain
Andhbhakt hai kya tu jo Germany shepherd ka propaganda dekhta hai uska logic aur Gyan WhatsApp University se milta hai tu khud se research Kiya kr 😂🤣🤣
I had exactly the same feeling while watching his video. I feel that, just like us, he has the right to express his opinion, but not at the cost of looking down on others. If you didn't like the movie, that's fine; you can come out and put your opinion, but when you are doing it with ill intentions, that's when your opinion turns into propaganda.
He's just using his audience into believing ki Jo vo sochta h Jo uske opinions hain waise hi sbke hone chahiye!!! That's how he keeps manipulating each and every subscriber
Money over openion
not dhruve rathee it's dhruve ghandhi
This guy used all different narratives to counter and is very different to what Dhruv said. His viewers should be smart to understand what I am saying.
Most of his videos are propaganda.
I am so happy that I follow this channel from a very long time. So proud of shan prasher to call out dhruv rathee's bias. Brilliant. 🙏🏻
Paise mile he isko ye video banane ke liya
@@chandrabhansingh6778ha ha German Shephard ko har video keliye paisa milta hai
This guy used all different narratives to counter and is very different to what Dhruv said. His viewers should be smart to understand what I am saying.
Bro, in animal, violence is highly glorified, but in gangs of wasseypur, the violence is subjective, and not glorified, thats what dhruv was saying
Do you seriously believe that these people will get that?
He never said that neither trying to do this ,the video is criticising his hypocrisy how he promoted movies containing violence in past plus his analysis of movie isn't right he called fans toxic because they like animal.makes no sense
@@sanyamtomar8181for sure these people will get that
Then why He promoted Death note
@@madts243 Cause in the end Light gets what he deserved. But in Animal the animal gets away with everything and has a happy ending.
Bhai ... You can't take manoj 's statement just for the sake of proving your point... Films do have impact on the society.. A single film called KANTARA changed the life of Daiva nartakas in Karanataka... Now Govt. Giving them financial aid the perishing art form got new life after Kantara hit.
Accha , tu mangalyaan movie dekhne ke baad sare log scientist kyu nahi ban gaye?
Movies do not influence society, society influences movies
@@mithileshchakravarty3883 if you are not inspired from Mangalyaan doesn't mean that nobody else has ..... Becoming scientist is not preparing 2 min. Maggie...
At the same time, I am not denying that, films are a reflection of the society... Both visa versa is right only.
@@vhpnow likewise becoming a criminal is also not a task of 2 mins
@@mithileshchakravarty3883 haha.. Becoming criminal is not good for society in the first place...
"Netflix se payment leke.."😂😂😂😂 i loved the way you called out that german shepherd... He is a propaganda master and everyone in india is aware of it by now.. its good that you called out that duffer. 👍
This is the way to call out Dhruv’s personal biased opinion. And psychological terms are on point 👏🏼 I don’t think anyone else could have made a better video on replying Dhruv rathee 🔥🔥
This random UA-camr's views is less than 10% of dhruv rathee video liked.😂😂😂
@@SilvioDante-qg7dc yeah his audience can't even take truth ,they are just crybabies thinking that they are educated from that manipulator
@@SilvioDante-qg7dc But that won't change the fact that Shan gave all logical explanations & exposed Dhruv's biased opinion lol 😂
@@SilvioDante-qg7dc popularity he has is for knowledgable content about history science and politics.he is not a movie reviewer .dhruv said gangs of wasseypur as clut movie....and now he has algery with voilence and animal is cancer..he just made the vedio cuz Animal is the hot topic and everyone is watching it and he seek opportunity for more views and more subscriber. but he forget about his past vedios bullshit.
@@Dipaaceacha hua gow money heist sacred games ki video netflix pe padi hai warna german shepard apne purane kartut chupane me mahir hai
Sahi to kaha Dhruv on ANIMAL movie.
Atleast there was someone who talked against the movie. Aap bhi support karo on this instead of finding unecessary faults and targeting him.
Agreed
This is an analysis in the true sense of the word. And kudos to you for doing this without any bias.
Art in its purest form will always be about the expressionist (expressing what the artist wants to say) rather than the communicator (focusing on the concerns of the viewer). Hope this settles pretty much every debate regarding this movie.
That is so fucking on point!!
Very aptly said.
Acha
Then why did Shan prasher do randi rona when thank you for coming, four more shots, gehraiyan released ?
They are also art
7 millions views hai.. Dekh k grow to kar rahe ho... But jo German shepherd ko expose karte hai.. Unko 100k viewers only... Why?? Share truth..
Nailed it, brother. This video demonstrates that criticism and disagreement can coexist with respect. Regards from Adelaide, Australia 🇦🇺
He may have called out Dhruv’s video, but to negate Dhruv’s argument, he would need to prove that animal is not a cancer for society, but in fact good for society. He hasn’t been able to establish that, and just keeps rambling on like an idiot.
@@msredcurtains problem is hypocrisy of druv rathee and his fans like you.On one side he promotes gow, breaking bad and sacred games and then he criticize animal,why different criteria according to movies?And yes this youtuber Shan Prasher also criticize negative aspects of animal and appreciate positive aspects also,but the way druv calls rapist to fans of gore, slasher,action genre movies is pure hypocrisy, it's everyone personal choice to see and love movies .You can't judge the character of person by choices of movie.And yes I also criticize negative aspects of animal but degrading the whole movie for your own judgement is definitely not acceptable,and yes if you have valid counter argument then reply me I will definitely reply you. 5:24 5:24
@@msredcurtainswhy he should prove anything he is not calling animal great social changer movie
Dhruv rathee should prove that just like animal gangs of wassepur sacred games breaking bad etc are not a cancer to society
Whoever pays him money then that movie is great
& when he is not paid for review that movie becomes cancer for the society
You are so dumb you didnt get the gist of the whole video
Its about hypocrisy
@@msredcurtains Least Retarded dhruv rathee fan
@@aryagaonkar2161i agree to some of shans point but shan also misrepresented few of the things, when he tryna expose dhruv hypocrisy like misrepresentation of death note anime
After watching the Dhruv Rathee video , I felt that UA-cam shouldn't have removed the dislike button
sure
Do you love your mother?
Outstanding Shan!
You're truly remarkable! You conveyed it perfectly when you mentioned that when some men realize they can't attain alpha or sigma status, they resort to labelling them as toxic misogynist.
I’m pretty sure if someone bothers Dhruv’s sister, unlike Ranbir Kapoor, Dhruv will run to Kejriwal.
And then all Kejriwal gonna say is,
“aJi iski toh jhanch honi chahiye, sab mile huye hain”😂😂😂
Bloody losers!
Dhruv Rathee may be wrong but the movie Animal is utterly illogical and what’s more concerning than the movie is that the character of Ranbir is being celebrated among youth who will go to any limits to defend and justify the actions of the senseless character.
you have still not understood the movie and what it wants to show
Yes, & gamers who play GTA becomes Salmon Khan on roads
"Ranbir is being celebrated among youth who will go to any limits to defend and justify the actions of the senseless character" that may be true, but this does not make the film itself toxic. I can paint the most beautiful girl in the world, but if a guy jacks off to that painting its not my art that at fault, it's the perception of my art in the mind of a backwards audience.
Animal is made for mature audiences, and it should be judged that way. If the general Indian audience watches 'taxi driver' and tries to kill people to fix the world, that is not the movies fault, it is the audience that lacks maturity. Anything illogical in this movie also exists in many other Bollywood movies, but specifically nit picking this movie for those points because you disagree with the impact it's making is deceptive.
Instead of telling sensible people to not watch this movie, maybe there should be an effort to teach people what to actually conclude from this movie....Not to behave like an Animal, that is Ranbir Kapoor in this movie.
@@1596bin I’m not nit picking Animal at all. Most of the recent Bollywood movies are subpar in terms of logic, Animal being the worst. And let’s not compare Taxi Driver, a cult classic, with this “cringe fest”. I respect your opinion- you liked Animal. But I didn’t. Let’s just leave it at that.
@@ashishbehera1150 That is true...you have as much right to dislike this movie as I have to like it
Also just to clarify, I was not trying to compare Taxi driver as a film to Animal, but the idea of how it's about a frustrated man that resorts to violence. And in the eyes of a wrong audience this can also create a toxic response.
But yes, agree to disagree about the movie 👍
The Much Needed Video!!!!
Finally someone is understanding how to tackle this Manipulator.
I literally clapped at the end. 👏👏Wow Shantanu, you and your content have grown more than any other youtuber rn ❤
I don't agree with the point that films don't change a society or don't have an impact on a society. If that would have been the case then govt. would not have been hellbent in censoring certain movies.
Mene movie me ra*e scene dekh kar ek ladki ka ra*e kar Diya bhi ab movie ke diractor ko fanshi de do
I agree with you. Films play a major role in shaping the society.
Especially the Indian society, we Indians are movie obsessed people, star obsessed people. Youngsters blindly follow their movie idols. We watch so many movies that they leave a subconscious effect on us, ppl r just too ignorant to accept it. They r talking about active and immediate effects which is a rare case of course, but not talking about the long run effect on psychology.
@@madhu6462 yes, and Dhruv Rathee has explained the long term effects of such movies in his video.
That Last Line Was Savage By Shan😂❤ A Film Genre Is Not Somebody's Character Certificate 🎥
Thank you for coming up and addressing this with an objective video. More power to you!
He may have called out some points in Dhruv’s video, but to negate Dhruv’s argument, he would need to prove that animal is not a cancer for society, but in fact good for society. He hasn’t been able to prove that, nor establish that, and just keeps rambling on like an idiot. 🤐
"Thats why education is important" wale nahi dikh rahe 🤡
😂😂
Most Sensible replies that Dhruv Rathee fans have when someone criticise him😂
1: "ANdBhakT"
2: "ThAtS wHy eEucaTiOn iS imPortaNt"
3:"He Is moRE edUCatEd thaN you "
4: "hE AlwayS sAys TruTh"
5: " WhAtSApP UniVErciTy faCts"
@@JaiJAGGANATH453 yes, only librandus can understand molana dhruv lathee
That's why besides education before making a video against dhruv watching his full video is important 🤣
@@Sarthak_Joravar and most sensible haters of dhruv rathee like u 🐵
When dhruv released that video, I truly self questioned my own choice of liking Animal movie. I was thinking, is my mentality going downwards? Do I like crime?
Thanks to Shan bhai for making this video and making me believe that no matter what anyone says or want to force any narrative on me, I wouldn't get underneath next time of anyone.
I'll honestly question everything and then make choice of own for liking or not.
Shoutout to Shan bhai❤❤
If manipulating is an art, then Dhruv is Picasso of it
@@loveyourself-n6y you correctly said.
@@suhaib5941 look we make our opinions based on our surroundings, childhood, and then what we see, what we read so if dhruv will counter all points of this video with the valid reasons, I'll accept it happily.
@@bigbull004dhruv to biased hai par animal hai to mediocre movie. Devesh Dixit k comedy roast dekhna animal ka.
@@bigbull004so no use of your brain , good .
U are absolutely correct…Dont know how UA-camrs can take fat cheques and so blatantly lie to the audience who give them their livelihood.. he should be shown that audience have brains and cannot be manipulated..
He may have called out some points in Dhruv’s video, but to negate Dhruv’s argument, he would need to prove that animal is not a cancer for society, but in fact good for society. He hasn’t been able to prove that, nor establish that, and just keeps rambling on like an idiot. 🤐
@@msredcurtains Animal is not cancer for society, you are accountable for what you do not the movie makers. It has been marketed in a way that alerts people to keep their children away from this movie. And stop spamming everywhere lil bro
@@Krep336 sure responsibility should be on an individual rather than a collective, because humans are not social beings. You are so right. Next to shock audience, if filmmakers start putting out snuff films, that would be okay too. Creative liberty and individual responsibility and all. You make such good points.
Shan bhai op in the chat❤
You are absolutely right brother ❤
1% people thanking dhruve rathee ( bo ka cho.)
This has to be one of the most structured, well researched and greatly orated videos I have ever seen. Much respect brother!
U r nowadays hitting out of the park by your awesome analysis!!!
Manoj Sir once said that, we as people / audience can’t dictate whether such a film should be made or not. Censor board is there for that part. And if you don’t like “such” films, don’t go and watch it. Simple. An artist doesn’t owe anything to the society, to public. And it’s not an artist’s job to give “message” in his/ her work. Rajamouli sir once said that his job is to ENTERTAIN public, and not to PREACH them.
What is the role movie critics, will you define it
@@philfact10MDhruv is not a movie critic. He keeps poking his nose everywhere and this time he put his foot on the wrong ground.
not dhruve rathee it's dhruve ghandhi
@@philfact10Mnothing, it's a made up profession for unemployed people watching movies all the time
@@shishirtrivedi3668 If movie stories is nonsense ( nothing )
Why not critics will criticise.
Critics or criticism writers are much more relavent than story less filmmakers.
This video is actually good Shan .. Even I liked the movie Animal - for the acting, direction, bgm and hall experience. That's it. I am not taking any toxicity shown in the movie to my home or letting any negativity shown , hamper my way of thinking or behaving.
Really love your funny reviews since 3 years but never knew that
you are that talented and rational.❤
wrong is wrong. No excuses. Can you expect such animal characters in your home. Movies are a mirror of society. So mirrors should be be clean.
Clean the society, the mirror shows what's standing before it🤷
there is a study which shows how after Kabir Singh smoking habits increased in youth in India, yes movies change the way people behave
in country like India where youth worship the hero,
Mention the study?
Animal movie Toxic hai q k violence glorified hai aur GOW is not glorifying violence on top climax mein yeh bhi bataya Jata hai violence k anjaan kia hai . But movies like Animal, KGF are giving rise to anti heroism
On top Manoj sir has said that movies don't change society but changes your style.. you see jaab har bande ka style change hojayga then one day society will start accepting bad things as norm..
I am not saying all movies are bad but ek time ta jaab bade Kuch kehtete then we use to respect it but this days har Banda Apne mein ek hero hai.. from where they this attitude..
Isliye bolta hu world cinema dekha karo ye garbage Indian cinema dekhkar tumahri soch bhi bhut choti ho gayi h
Bollywood 70s se aurat ko bikni m dikha raha tumhre mulle dada log mast dekhte aa rhe the
@@slayer_142 could you explain your POV..?
Dhruv rathee :
-Gets paid for promoting one-sided agenda in politics
-Gets paid for promoting one-sided agenda in movie
Very chalakh bro very chalakh😂😂
Thank you for calling out hypocrisy of Dr. Shepherd
For you all if you think movies doesn't effect our society so listen When I watched Padman I started to talk about periods and When I watched Mission Mangal I got motivated for space science and result Now I am here in IISC Bangalore to pursue my bachelor in Physics major.
Then ur easy to manipulate.
Wow , had no idea it was so easy to manipulate you. God forbid tomorrow a movie comes out on t€rrori$m...
@@tech_report_0868 I don't know what I should write to you all . But sometimes I feel it's not your fault because your family never teach you how to control the content you watch. I think they never had any parental control on you. That's why you came to support such a toxic and violent movie
@@Yashyadav-ib3he Another BS comment when you can't refute the point. Haven't even watched Animal. Also , maybe your parents should've taught you self control and critical thinking capabilities , well , you could've developed these yourself if your parents would've provided some autonomy in your life , which definitely doesn't seem the case as you can be so easily manipulated. Classic case of controlling parents. Don't blame them though, it could be generational trauma too , who knows , maybe they got manipulated into doing something wrong too considering how easily manipulative you are. Oh , "Parents never controlled what you watch" , yes , unlike your parents when I reached a certain age , they decided to stop controlling the content that I watch , because my parents TRUST me. Maybe try instilling a sense of trust in your parents , they'd probably stop controlling you & your content too.
@@tech_report_0868 It's possible but it depends on me if I am going to watch that or not . Because I really respect my mind, it is not dustbin to fill negative thoughts
Someone of Team Animal give some pedigree to the German shepherd.
Only then the German shepherd will bark the positivity of Animal film 😅😅😅😅
no wonder we always try to put personal comments on their personal life of the
people who are in public life. let it be mr. pawan kalyan in AP or any one else we are habituated for a long time . dont worry the attempt to change has begun, manzil door nahi hai bhai
Thank you shan bhai
Thank you
A Great Reply was needed
Your Reply was Great
My man! 🙌Once again putting in the time and effort to put forward a coherent discourse. I have never seen Shan presenting an opinion to his audience without the supporting arguments based on sound reasoning. Kamal!
True brother 😊❤🇮🇳🤗🥰
Shan Prasher Aapne toh Dhruv ko attack kiya. How did you prove that Animal itself is not a cancer movie? You achieved basically nothing with this dumb video. Sure, you’ve called out Dhruv. But you haven’t yet established that this movie is not cancer.
Prove that this movie is good for society, not a cancer, then you’ll be worth time. Otherwise you’re just trying really hard to sound smart.
@@msredcurtainsthe motive of this video is to call out Dhruv rathee on his Hypocrisy and biased review just because the movie Dosent fits his ideology. Criticising the movie isn't bad at all but Rathi ji even indirectly said that the people that like the film are mentally ret@rd or have same mindset as r@pists? How is that justified mister
@@sam_1912 the message I got from Dhruv’s video is that exposure to content like this can change the mindset of a person, and society as a whole. That what you consume affects you.
I’m not commenting about the presentation of Dhruv, only the message of the video, and that’s what I understand.
If there is some other message you’ve gathered, specifically that anyone who has watched the movie is already a retard or rapist, would help me if you can share those quotes from the original video. Thank you
@@msredcurtains He didn't say that rapist thing directly, I said it that he said it indirectly which shan in his video has explained quite well how he did it.
I'll answer the other questions later, first I want you to answer that there are many movies and series all around OTT platforms which are more notorious, more misogynistic compared to animal, more gore violence and some of which even Rathi ji has even termed as cult classics (Gang of wasseypur, sacred games, mirzapur, breaking bad, four more shots, thank you for coming and so so many other shows whether it be Bolly/Holly), and it's not like these are not well known..most people know these and watch and because of OTT these series are open to teenagers like Munnu also who also has access to porn even though it is banned, we can't blame the movies for that.
So my question is WHY IS ONLY ANIMAL DEEMED AS CANCER, who now all of a sudden so much hate (cause even Rathi ji is just blatantly hating on this not even knowing the full thing just soo biased). If a movie is bad it should definitely be called out and all but it's just not understandable how only Animal is bearing this.
Bolna hai to sabko bolo warna jo ideology mein fit na ho usko nahi SIMPLE.
I felt the same way watching Druv's video because I clearly remembered him promoting these other such violent movies with Netflix. And yes, I agree with Manoj sir that movies just influence a hairstyle, not people's personality. Thank you for this well spoken video. ❤
People need to stop imaging children watching and thinking what will be the impact on their mind because this movie isnt for kids. 😂
hey, are you sure films don't change people's mindset and thoughts 🤔 I think films change mindset if you like any movie and decided to change your hairstyle your mindset also will be change according to the movie...
after watching wasepur people started repeating its dialog publicly and that was abusive words.. the 3rd class language that youth used on a daily basis comes from movies only !!
larki pata lenge types of words they learn from movies.. love story type Bollywood movies directly change our society
People need to rewatch what Dhruv said and what this guy is saying line by line and you guys will find out this guy just opposed for the sake of it, not at all been able to prove Dhruv wrong. :P
@@TheCatAndTheArt Stop spamming every comment. We get it, you are butt licker of that german shepherd.😆😆
Regarding change of mindset through movie/series, the best example is fake feminism promoted in the series like 4 more shots, made in heaven etc etc. and people are getting influenced by these movies/series.
@@No_One1231 you are absolutely right, if you remember kerela story movie.. because of this movie people started arguing and even fighting for Hindu Muslim community and the movie was so popular that's why it dubbed in all languages.. The BJP party was promoting this movie like their own house movie .. each and every popular movie affects our society and mindsets very effectively it's 💯% sure
Cigarette peena..cancer ko promote karna hai. 🤡
This line is enough to know the level of Intellect Dhruv has about movies.
No, shan you didn't call out animal with equal intensity as you have called out thank you for coming and other films.
You justified ranbir's character by saying that he was saving his sister . But you didn't realise he brought a gun in college and even fired it.
Right
@@mariapauline8732 because acc to him only toxic feminism based movies affects society not toxic masculinity movies ? bro literally mai 18 19 saal ke bacho ko padhata bhi hoon unhone jab kaha ki achi film toh hai sir Ill tell them ask me same question after some years and as a teacher I admire professor vikas divyakirti sir who said "films like animal take our society 10 years back"
@@HimanshuRanjan-zb2rv very true, in the end if they showed that Ranbir is bad n he learnt lesson what he did he is not right then still I can accept but showing a man should be like this, it effects the boys mentality
Finally someone logical and entertaining at the same time giving counter relpy to biased video of Dhruv which he is doing from long time
Well done Shan bhai keep going 👏
Abe gadhe tu mat dekha na to usse 😂😂😂
Mujhe hamesa se lagta tha ki mumbai ki ladkiya khubsurat hoti h because of bollywood but aisa nhi h 😢
@@raja-jl9os Tu yaha pe bhi aagaya
@@raja-jl9os Tu konsa State se hai ?!
@@hiteshkumar1314 mere kahne ka matlab h ki mumbai ki ladkiya bhi average hoti h
first time here watching you videos and super impressed! every point you put forth hits in every angle and totally in love with your conclusion. I loved watching Animal but at the same time I hate toxicity in real life and stay miles away from it!
This guy used all different narratives to counter and is very different to what Dhruv said. His viewers should be smart to understand what I am saying.
@@TheCatAndTheArtwhat?
Most Sensible replies that Dhruv Rathee fans have when someone criticise him😂
1: "ANdBhakT"
2: "ThAtS wHy eEucaTiOn iS imPortaNt"
3:"He Is moRE edUCatEd thaN you "
4: "hE AlwayS sAys TruTh"
5: " WhAtSApP UniVErciTy faCts"
Shan bhai ne german shepherd ko uski aukaat dikhadi 🙃
Ha dikh rha hai
Finally I found someone who logically point to point called out Dhruv Rathee❤❤ this is so needed. Shan you deserves more really ❤
I watched animal and being a thriller,action and gore movies fan and being a woman Dhruv’s video made me feel bad… thank you Shan for calling this out
Indeed, and Animal movie was not glorifying anything...
Ranbir's character lost almost everything in his life and his actions led to the rise of his psychotic double
Shan Prasher ji. Aapne toh Dhruv ko attack kiya. How did you prove that Animal itself is not a cancer movie? You achieved basically nothing with this dumb video. Sure, you’ve called out Dhruv. But you haven’t yet established that this movie is not cancer. Lagatar dumb videos aa rahi hain from you.
If I said, you keep posting these body building photos even though you would never qualify as a professional body builder. Does that help to negate your dumb argument? No. So however Dhruv has presented his video, his argument is that the movie is cancer.
You’re attacking his presentation and past videos, but you haven’t been able to make any negating statement about his argument itself yet.
Prove that this movie is good for society, not a cancer, then you’ll be worth time.
Even though Dhruv’s video is not perfect, you’ve got nothing on him. Screaming loud on the screen doesn’t make you smart sorry.
The problem with dhruv is he is misinterpreting facts...he is comparing rapists and misogynistic people with the one who watch these cult classic films...one of dhruv rathee viewers was female and dhruv rathee made her believe that all people in that theatre who are wooing and cheering are the one who likes to rape Or like to do extreme misogyny
Now this is what we call a totally unbiased video hats off to you sir. For my personal opinion I liked animal movie as an entertainment as we all should look at it just like entertainment. and not as something we should be taking inspiration from. If any person lives their life based on some movie character then they should really reflect and get mature enough to be able to seperate reality from fantasy
Man, the last diaper change analogy was so wholesome! Overall an excellent and logical analysis brother 👏👏
So accurate and so good. Thank you so much for creating such well researched video bcz it’s so sad tht people like dhruv just like to force their opinions on people.
Why people still watching his propaganda videos ?
He has been exposed numerous time for giving biased facts from Leftist news articles.
We Indians have a problem where we see Veed or "crowd" we go to that shop.
German Shepard is just using that mindset of Indians.
I always cross check information after watching something & i could not stand his Leftist biased videos stopped watching his videos for 4 years, moreover he claims he is unbiased , at least he should be honest with his audience
What is bcz?
because@@nitinpratap3958
Dhruv rathe is best explainer😊
@@KADAKSAMBALPURI a german shepard puppy detected
Shan Is One Of The Intelligent UA-camrs I Have Seen, The Way He Puts Logic With Knowledge Is Mind Blowing 🙏🏻🔥
U do know that neil deGrasse is also on UA-cam😅
He is scientist fool not a youtuber@@rishavrai99999
Faad diya bhai. Everything I thought while watching Dhruv's video and more. Well researched and on point.😢
It's glad to see someone finally saying film does not change society...
There is a difference between portrayal of violence in Anurag Kashyap films and Sandeep's films. Anurag depicts it while Sandeep celebrates it. There is crude violence and then there is sensational violence. I have childhood friends who never got the privilege of getting good education, when you hear their opinion and see how they idolize Ranbir's character, you'll get to know where the problem lies and why Dhruv's arguments are logical to a great extent.
And you can only blame the director in this context because if not everyone, people are going to idolize a person who "Protects his family" at any cost, rides a private jet and fires machine guns. Not everyone has the intellectual ability to maturely understand problematic plots. They end up subscribing to a wrong ideology which will reflect in their actions at micro levels.
Rightly said. Animal is glorifying the crime.
@@Underdogayush I have, he is absolutely right. You are 'fools' for not understanding the difference between these movies. Anurag's movies show the reality and never promotes violence. As the writer of this comment rightly said violence isn't celebrated in his movies. Where as in animal violence has been glorified.
animal ne kese violence ko celeberate kiya hai jara batayenge aap
@@marcosurvivalist7266 Remember the machine gun scene background music? Remember the scene where Ranbir walks out naked? It celebrates violence the same way few punjabi songs promote gun violence. The difference is subtle yet polarizes viewers so much so that they start taking offence when something is said against the film.
Shan prasher making video on dhruv rathee was not on my bingo card this year
We live in an era where Munnu can watch BDSM porn in 4K UHD resolution. This film is peanut compared to that. Needless to say Germany, The Netherlands was porn capital once upon a time.
Watched the movie a couple of days ago and I just can't fathom why some people are bashing it for no reason. I loved it SO MUCH. Brilliantly written and executed story about an unhinged main character. It doesn't justify ANYTHING from Ranvijay's character and all of his negative actions have some ramifications or consequences. Geetanjali's brilliant monologue calling him out for his toxic behaviours and her slapping Ranvijay multiple times made it absolutely perfect and showed that the script is not glorifying any of his actions.
massive taste issue
Brilliantly written story???
to deem this narrative as brilliantly crafted and executed seems incredulous.
Now this is called a well researched video 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 Kudos to Shaan 👍
Though I am fan of Dhruv, but yes you rightly pointed out his doglapan by showing his clips on Wasseypur and Sacred Games. Good call out Shan!
fan of duggal? have you seen his videos. propaganda at its best
Same
Lol how can u be his fan. 🤣🤣 He is a pathetic person. If u hv brain stay away from his propaganda 😒
@k_t8042 sorry, but I disagree with you. Cos he is the one who calls out the propoangandas, and most of his videos are informational and educational. Here Shan rightly pointed out his dubious review. And I am just a fan of Dhruv as I am of Shan, but not a blind follower of anyone
Anyways, we all are entitled to our opinions and I respect your's
Bss abb toh baat khatam ho gyi...
Dhruv ratthe fans are so innocent thinking themself educated by watching his biased videos😂😂
sorry bro/mam, i disagree with you. Mr. Rathee videos are only other side of the coin. Always Mr. Arnab Goswami cannot be right. only because he shouts louder , heis argumets are ONLY THE TRUTH. I have the basic right to keep my opinion , so mr Rathee has. Dissent is te basic right of Democracy , whic unfortunately has been in oblivion for some time .
😂😂😂😂😂 u must be proud of watching animal that glorifies extreme level of violence and cringe subject matter
Hey Shan, I have been watching you for years..much before your individual channel :)
Have always enjoyed your reviews so much so that, before investing 2-3 hours in a movie, I first watch your review. Not only you critically analyse different aspects of content but also you convey in a fun way. Loved it how you called out and ambushed selective analysis of any person including Dhruv here this time.
Loved your family pic on insta...sending love to your daughter ❤
Always a fan 😊
Thats your opinion but dhruv is a hypocrite
not dhruve rathee it's dhruve ghandhi
Hello Shantanu bro... I have been following your videos since your old famous Honest Reviews. And I'm inspired by you to review movies and series. You have always been one of my go-to creators. Love your analysis and points.
Also I agree with your opinions time and time again. Keep posting videos and keep inspiring people like me.
People's capacity for independent thought seems obscured, as evidenced by the gathering of seemingly mindless followers around Dhruv Rathee. His videos, staunchly one-sided, meticulously disseminate a carefully curated agenda that is ingested without question by his devoted audience. Your valiance and courage is commendable Shan 🙌 Thank you for sharing a dissenting perspective I know this will inevitably draw the ire of his zealous followers, who, like a brigade, are poised to inundate the comments section with disparagement. It is a perplexing phenomenon, the sway one person can hold over others, guiding them down a path of unquestioning adherence, even when the narrative presented is heavily skewed.
Itna english merko bhi sikhna hai
Oi, if you are talking about braindead followers then you dont necessarily need to be writing tharoor-ish.
@@bu11ymaguire😂
Couldn't agree more brother.. not just this video but most of dhruv rathee's videos are staunchly one sided and full of cherry picked facts which supports his agenda, on top of that he presents his videos in such a way that a regular viewer of his channel would say that dhruv is totally neutral and is just presenting facts but in reality it's the opposite.
His good thing which attracts millions is his well articulated presentation and easy way of breaking things down..
Is he biased? Yes ofcourse
Bro I'm a big fan of Dhruv but you left me speech less
Bro try following unbiased creators
He can make good content
But he praise people who pay him
From politicians to movies
Honest and unbiased opinion..well done Shan!!
He may have called out some points in Dhruv’s video, but to negate Dhruv’s argument, he would need to prove that animal is not a cancer for society, but in fact good for society. He hasn’t been able to prove that, nor establish that, and just keeps rambling on like an idiot. 🤐
@@msredcurtainsYou need to grow some more billions of brain cells to understand what's going on.
not dhruve rathee it's dhruve ghandhi
Nicely explained sir ❤
A reply to dhruv's biased video was much needed
The video of Dhruvs on animal movie was the first time I disagreed. "Movies should be taken as a movie not reality". One sided perceptions is always wrong perspective.
Yes, absolutely bhi sab ne yeh logic hoga na hypocrisy hoga samaj ni paye
@@sonalikain Haha bs yuhi rak diya atscha lga isliye:)
If u intelligent, u will understand, almost every video he make is paid to cater to a particular audience which is already biased and opinionated abt a certain topic. The rythemic way in which he speaks and everything that parashar pointed out. If anybody thinks its just abt animal movie review must be kidding himself
Same with four more shots please and veera di wedding. Films should be taken as Film
Like you cherry picking and having bias in your review of Kho gaye hum kaha?
Awesome bro..
A tight slap on hypocrisy..
Proud of you Shan..🤗❤️
Shan Prasher Aapne toh Dhruv ko attack kiya. How did you prove that Animal itself is not a cancer movie? You achieved basically nothing with this dumb video. Sure, you’ve called out Dhruv. But you haven’t yet established that this movie is not cancer.
Prove that this movie is good for society, not a cancer, then you’ll be worth time. Otherwise you’re just trying really hard to sound smart.
@@msredcurtains
At first only he said that he is not going to take any side or will he defame Dhruv..
And I also said "slap on hypocrisy not Dhruv.."
So I hope you got the answer?
It is nothing personal bro..
Take care
@@msredcurtains You want a proof that animal is good for scoiety, Then read this
1) Even if Ranbir kapoor had e terrible relationship with his father in this film, As and when he came to know about the attempt to murder of his father, He left everything and came to him.
2) Ranbir slept with tripti dimri in this film and rashmika was not aware about it. Still he told her that thing, and left Tripti dimri with respect that she can go anywhere .
3) If you have seen ranbir with his child, He has treated him with all love and care that means he has not passed the same experience to his son which he has felt in his childhood.
4) And last, If you think Revenge taken by ranbir was wrong, then let me remind you how our judicial system is strong enough to punish the real criminals.
Same it's like saying Violent game is bad for children. Then ban gta6.
Grow up guys
Shaan ki bhi payment ho gai
That's called a constructive criticism with facts ❤
He may have called out some points in Dhruv’s video, but to negate Dhruv’s argument, he would need to prove that animal is not a cancer for society, but in fact good for society. He hasn’t been able to prove that, nor establish that, and just keeps rambling on like an idiot. 🤐
@@msredcurtains he doesn't said that animal is not toxic movie it is but it does not effect the society simple is that if it was then gangs of wasipur and scared games are more extreme than animal in which he has appreciated them due to paid collaboration
The point is dhruv rathee want money for good review
@@chandrabhansingh6778 damn true
Not sure, about this but it definitely left a worse impression on teenagers watching this movie. I won't advise people below 25 who are not mature enough to watch this movie. This might influence decision making and normalize this behaviour by actors as okay for our society
The combination of rational and humor gives you more success shaan 🎉
Dhruv Rathee didn't like violence and message used in Animal but for sure he definitely liked Game of Thrones and squid games kind of movies cuz those movies or series are in foreign languages and that is cool according to him...
He never said that.Those were reality of those times.this is created with plot.also this is celebrating anti heroism and this should only be watched by adults but here teenagers and kids watch
@@human6729then it's the fault of parents ki wo apne bache ko nahi sambhal sakte
Tbh....Game of Thrones is way different (and way better) than animal....both have violence but one glorifies it and one doesn't....there ain't no regret in Ranveer Kapoor's character....to a certain point the violence was justifiable but then it crossed the limits.... especially with the womanizing part.... Game of Thrones is on a totally different arc
explain how animal glorify violence and GOT not? jab ki waha l katne wala scene bhi tha @@Writing_freak
@@Writing_freak
Yes.. unnecessary nudity and having incestual relationship is totally normal and an integral part of Society as shown in GOT.
👍
Finally Bro You Replied to Political Party's German shepherd 🤡, excellent work Shan bhai ♨️