a yeah!:) I tell you what. yeah you right. Deepchord is always more soft, even when Deepchord makes the sound hard on puprose, like on those "Vantage isle" series, there's awlays something soft and floatey in their sound. In Basic Channel yeah they are just extreme, EVEN WHEN SUPER SOFT IN TERMS OF TECHNICAL QUALITIES OF SOUND, yeah EDGY is the term fot that. And yeah sometimes you just say that something is for example stupid to say that it's actually very clever, or you say that something is just a copy to stres that it's highly original. NONETHELESS -> I prefer the Basic Channel edgy sound, in fact i have a feeling that Deepchord is as much Basic Channel copy as it was possible for those poor Deepchord fellas:)
yeah sorry about that. it was in the time when i was a trainee in journalism!!! now i am well established and relaxed:)) i tell you what!! i am not the kind of a person that can do something 100% wrong. in above opinion there is a point truth, point truth head shot, and some not important bullshit. DEEPCHORD AND ECHOSPACE ARE FLOATEY!!! they are just more like yagya, and Basic Channel is total techno!!! sorry about my mistake!!! BECAUSE OF THAT, YOU HAVE A FEELING THAT DEEPCHORD AND ECHOSPACE IS SOFTER AND MORE MELLOW. BECAUSE IT IS!!! YET IT IS NOT BAD THING. IT DOES NOT COME FROM DOING BASIC CHANNEL THING WRONG!!! IT COMES FROM DIFFERENT STYLE!!!! YET!!!!!!!!!! MY OPINION IS JUSTIFIED. I MEAN MY OPINION IS TOO CRITICAL, IT'S A BULLSHIT, IT'S NOT RIGHT TO ACCUSE DEEPCHORD! BUT THE FACT IS THAT I PREFER THE STRAIGHT UP TECHNO STYLE OF BASIC CHANNEL TO THE FLOATEY AND SPACEY STYLE OF DEEPCHORD. COMING FROM THAT, I WENT TOO FAR WITH MY CRITICISM, THINKING THAT IF I PREFER BASIC CHANNEL, IT MEANS THAT THOSE DUDES JUST FAILED AT COPYING IT. SORRY ABOUT THAT!!! MY GIRLFRIEND WERONIKA BELOVED IS RIGHT!!! THESE ARE 2 DISTINCT STYLES!!!! CHEERS!!! AND ALSO THERE ARE MONTHS IN MY LIFE WHEN I LISTEN TO DEEPCHORD AND ECHOSPACE ONLY!!!! YOU NEED TO KNOW THAT!!!! JUST IN LAST HALF YEAR I WAS NOT RELAXED AT ALL!!! I COULD NOT APPRIECIATE GOOD AMBIENT TECHNO!!! BECUASE DEEPCHORD AND ECHOSPACE IS RATHER AMBIENT TECHNO, THAN DUB TECHNO!!! ITS SO LITTLE TECHNO, THAT YOU NEED TO POINT THAT WITH THE STRANGE ADDITION: TECHNO, BUT AMBIENT. YOU DONT UNDERSTAND?? LISTEN TO ECHOSPACE OR GAS!!!!
Aside from the two groups being labeled as "dub techno", the two sounds couldn't be more different. Any discerning listener could easily spot how different the sounds actually are.
![Deepchord - dc13|dc14|dc16 [remastered] (Full LP)](/img/n.gif)
this tune is everything, could play this for the rest of time
This tune this tune fucking amazing hypnotic stuff brilliant thanks sir rodd modell 👏 👌 🙌
thats why they called deep chord
Love this to bits🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️❤️❤️❤️ timelines quality techno 👁💙❤️
3:39 a UFO rises out of the ocean and disappears into the night.
Yesss!
gwaaaan !
Deep Chord Charmer 👅👅👅
!!!!~~
what I think about minimal. only good stuff
Megaendless
a yeah!:) I tell you what. yeah you right. Deepchord is always more soft, even when Deepchord makes the sound hard on puprose, like on those "Vantage isle" series, there's awlays something soft and floatey in their sound. In Basic Channel yeah they are just extreme, EVEN WHEN SUPER SOFT IN TERMS OF TECHNICAL QUALITIES OF SOUND, yeah EDGY is the term fot that. And yeah sometimes you just say that something is for example stupid to say that it's actually very clever, or you say that something is just a copy to stres that it's highly original. NONETHELESS -> I prefer the Basic Channel edgy sound, in fact i have a feeling that Deepchord is as much Basic Channel copy as it was possible for those poor Deepchord fellas:)
yeah sorry about that. it was in the time when i was a trainee in journalism!!! now i am well established and relaxed:)) i tell you what!! i am not the kind of a person that can do something 100% wrong. in above opinion there is a point truth, point truth head shot, and some not important bullshit.
DEEPCHORD AND ECHOSPACE ARE FLOATEY!!! they are just more like yagya, and Basic Channel is total techno!!! sorry about my mistake!!! BECAUSE OF THAT, YOU HAVE A FEELING THAT DEEPCHORD AND ECHOSPACE IS SOFTER AND MORE MELLOW. BECAUSE IT IS!!! YET IT IS NOT BAD THING. IT DOES NOT COME FROM DOING BASIC CHANNEL THING WRONG!!! IT COMES FROM DIFFERENT STYLE!!!! YET!!!!!!!!!! MY OPINION IS JUSTIFIED. I MEAN MY OPINION IS TOO CRITICAL, IT'S A BULLSHIT, IT'S NOT RIGHT TO ACCUSE DEEPCHORD! BUT THE FACT IS THAT I PREFER THE STRAIGHT UP TECHNO STYLE OF BASIC CHANNEL TO THE FLOATEY AND SPACEY STYLE OF DEEPCHORD. COMING FROM THAT, I WENT TOO FAR WITH MY CRITICISM, THINKING THAT IF I PREFER BASIC CHANNEL, IT MEANS THAT THOSE DUDES JUST FAILED AT COPYING IT. SORRY ABOUT THAT!!! MY GIRLFRIEND WERONIKA BELOVED IS RIGHT!!! THESE ARE 2 DISTINCT STYLES!!!! CHEERS!!! AND ALSO THERE ARE MONTHS IN MY LIFE WHEN I LISTEN TO DEEPCHORD AND ECHOSPACE ONLY!!!! YOU NEED TO KNOW THAT!!!! JUST IN LAST HALF YEAR I WAS NOT RELAXED AT ALL!!! I COULD NOT APPRIECIATE GOOD AMBIENT TECHNO!!! BECUASE DEEPCHORD AND ECHOSPACE IS RATHER AMBIENT TECHNO, THAN DUB TECHNO!!! ITS SO LITTLE TECHNO, THAT YOU NEED TO POINT THAT WITH THE STRANGE ADDITION: TECHNO, BUT AMBIENT. YOU DONT UNDERSTAND?? LISTEN TO ECHOSPACE OR GAS!!!!
u mad nigga
Paolo Sot what drugs were you on at the time of writing these comments? I'm guessing coke or speed. Definitely something stimulating. My man....
If Deepchord isn’t relaxing enough, just add some coke and shouting at people on UA-cam!
@@pawesotwinski1033 You forgot about the track Radiance by Basic Channel.
struggles to shine compared to the A side of this release, but nevertheless - its still quality over qualities
it's a nice basic channel copy, but a little bit too late and a little bit too 1:1 :)
Aside from the two groups being labeled as "dub techno", the two sounds couldn't be more different. Any discerning listener could easily spot how different the sounds actually are.
they only used the same hardware. its like saying that two guitarists are a copy of each other
@@g00zik97 you know which Hardware? Or any link to the source?