@80sguy27 No, I would not call him Genius if he is guilty and would accept the SEBI judgment, but are the charges proved ?? My comment is based on his performance, which is a fact, whereas your comment reflects a pre conceived notion that he is involved in wrongdoing. MF are subject to market risk, the only diff with him and other dumb fund managers is that everyone gets u sign this big BS but no one takes the real calculated risk to generate more Alpha, no wonder his fund's performance is an ire to many dumb Money managers especially if u generate superior returns as good as any damn PMS. This is the only difference between a rational and an irrational thinker, but I wish you good luck. 👍
Please ask difficult questions like what are the top 3 inputs to their model and what are 3 predictive analytics metrics What is the actual process. Always same old boring questions and replies
@deme3017 Please have some common sense. Why the heck? Someone's gonna tell you their internal model?? Did Jim Simons tell the whole world how his model made 67% CAGR??
Investigators should check if they have any role in managing the weekly expiries, and if they time their transactions in tandem and in coordination with any of their associates dealing with fno..
High. 'Continue Efforts To Create Wealth For Investors'. Advise to capitalise on sector rotation. Watch Sandeep Tandon. Founder, Quant MF on ET Now Exclusive.
@budgetpadmanaban_ Correct Sir. Stupidity to the core when you don't even realize that the money stream is different for Quant and a subset of overall Sensex.
Giving 565% return in 5 years in one fund and similar returns in other funds is incredibly suspicious. How's this possible without some sort of insider trading?
@@souravpal1593 Made some money but not this much. Maybe I am old school and prefer Peter Lynch style of simple investing. I don't know how this fund house makes such fabulous returns by data analytics, backtesting etc.
Your suspicion is valid. But the answer is in your question. If there was insider trading, it could be by one fund manager. Full fund house will not attempt such stupidity. In such a case, only one fund would be an outperformer. But in Quant, all their funds are going very well. Which means they are doing something very right + the market being on steroids has helped them.
Heartening to see him back. People are clearly jealous of this genius.
Are u guys paid commenters
@@Cv13zv Absolutely not. His performance speaks for himself.
@@deepeshsao1008 Let's see if you guys will keep calling him genius after the SEBI Report comes out.
@@80sguy27 Lolz
@80sguy27 No, I would not call him Genius if he is guilty and would accept the SEBI judgment, but are the charges proved ??
My comment is based on his performance, which is a fact, whereas your comment reflects a pre conceived notion that he is involved in wrongdoing. MF are subject to market risk, the only diff with him and other dumb fund managers is that everyone gets u sign this big BS but no one takes the real calculated risk to generate more Alpha, no wonder his fund's performance is an ire to many dumb Money managers especially if u generate superior returns as good as any damn PMS.
This is the only difference between a rational and an irrational thinker, but I wish you good luck. 👍
Tandon ji....appreciate your clarity of thought.
Found the Founder of the Fund, a very clear concept minded with balanced assessment capability.
I hope, the Fund will not be away from a good growth.
Please ask difficult questions like what are the top 3 inputs to their model and what are 3 predictive analytics metrics
What is the actual process. Always same old boring questions and replies
he won’t answer them, It’s his proprietary model
That is there IP, why will they give it away for free? The company runs based on that.
@@sagarjambukar7137they will not give it away and no need to , you are correct
@deme3017 Please have some common sense. Why the heck? Someone's gonna tell you their internal model?? Did Jim Simons tell the whole world how his model made 67% CAGR??
Foolish expectation !!!
Legend Sandeep Tandon❤
Investigators should check if they have any role in managing the weekly expiries, and if they time their transactions in tandem and in coordination with any of their associates dealing with fno..
@@rajk7007 I don't think they do derivatives .
So long one can Return, high std.div ,timings, everything is good. We're with you,
All i needed today ❤😅
High. 'Continue Efforts To Create Wealth For Investors'. Advise to capitalise on sector rotation. Watch Sandeep Tandon. Founder, Quant MF on ET Now Exclusive.
Stupidity to the core. 94,000 Cr to 1,00,000 Cr is hardly 6%. Whereas Sensex from 80,000 to 1,00,000 is 25%.
The growth of two comes for different sources. So direct comparison or correlation is foolishness which you have done.
@budgetpadmanaban_ Correct Sir. Stupidity to the core when you don't even realize that the money stream is different for Quant and a subset of overall Sensex.
We are with you sir 🙏
so Well Spoken Sandeep !
Quant time is over. It made money when no body knew it. Now AMC is big enough to be closley watched. Surely its returns will come down.
Crystal clear approach, 😊👍
Insightful interview
Legend
What about cfo resignation
CFO resigned in feb
Chor chori Kareche barma jiyo bharache. 😂
See the timing of quant Tondon. The moment front running is discovered. He comes for interviews to control the damage. 🤣🤣
All gibberish
Like your shitty life
Time for you to come to these interviews
Giving 565% return in 5 years in one fund and similar returns in other funds is incredibly suspicious. How's this possible without some sort of insider trading?
Have you missed the rally?😊
@@souravpal1593 Made some money but not this much. Maybe I am old school and prefer Peter Lynch style of simple investing. I don't know how this fund house makes such fabulous returns by data analytics, backtesting etc.
😂
Bull market
Your suspicion is valid. But the answer is in your question. If there was insider trading, it could be by one fund manager. Full fund house will not attempt such stupidity. In such a case, only one fund would be an outperformer. But in Quant, all their funds are going very well. Which means they are doing something very right + the market being on steroids has helped them.