The i440 is so legendary. Its spirit lives on today in virtual machines due to being the default setting for new x86-64 VMs in Qemu and VMWare. There's probably billions+ of servers out there "running" on the i440 virtual chipset.
Yup, I maintain a 440BX Asus board with dual 800 MHz P-III Coppermine slot-1 CPUs for nostalgic purposes. It's bullet-proof and rock solid, never had a single issue with it, using multiple different vintage operating systems, with dozens of different vintage apps and games.
can run tualatins on it with a bit of tinkering as well - running mine at either 233MHz p2 or a 1.2GHz celeron p3 all just by slotting out the processor :)
Like! How about a Celeron vs Pentium MMX vs K6-2 video? I think it would be very intereresting since those CPUs were the most popular in 1998. Most people in 1998 had P1 MMX, Celeron and K6-2, the P2 was ridiculously expensive back then.
I remember a while back his K6-3+ video that is able to bridge a lot of performance. You'll get around 450 MHz Pentium speed at the top, but can turn off the cache and reduce the multi in software and get pretty close to 386 speed.
I have that same motherboard. The "LOAD SETUP DEFAULTS" (which is the same as clearing CMOS), set the "IDE HDD Block Mode" as Disabled, with a huge performance impact in Disc Drives. "TURBO DEFAULT" set it to Enabled for faster access.
This system with a Elsa Victory II was my first computer in 1998, when I was 13. It was the most exciting moment in my short life, when i got this. I only left my room for the toilet and food for a whole week!
In 1998 I got a PII 350, 32GB PC-100 SDRAM, 8GB HDD Pre-Built. It came with Sound Blaster compatible sound on the board and built in AGP x2 Rage 128 Pro graphics. I upped it to 512MB PC-100, 20GB Maxtor 7200RPM HDD and a Voodoo 2 3000. I got the base unit from Gateway. It was the first last and only pre-built I have ever purchased. It was an enormous step up from my P233 MMX, So much so I couldn't believe it. GL Quake was amazing. UltraHLE was amazing, really anything I threw at it for the next 2 years was amazing. I recently got a few from a recycler for free, including 2 PII 450s, a PII 350 and one of the odd 66 Mhz FSB PII 366 models. Weird those models. They perform like an un-gimped Celeron. I also received the Celeron you reviewed last video as well as the socketed model from after the PIII launch. I loved that PII 350 so much that after I ordered the parts to build an Athlon system I didn't build it right away. I finished all the games I was playing on my PII 350 before I did. The last game I beat was FFVIII. Then I moved onto the Athlon as Max Payne played ok on the PII 350 but I knew it would scream on the Athlon. I also OCed that PII 350 to 450 Mhz. It was stable and worked fine. I put a larger, faster fan on the CPU box but I don't think it was necessary, just precautionary. At that time I also received a PIII 1 Ghz system as a tip from a customer. Yes, an entire PC, monitor, mouse, keyboard, printer and some extras. He said he was going to put it into the trash otherwise. This was a very wealthy person. I then set up to test all three and concluded the Athlon T-Bird was going to be my battlestation, the PIII was going in the living room and I gave the PII 350 to my adopted son. He needed something to keep him out of trouble and that was the ticket.
My family also got the PII 350 Gateway tower. That was a sweet computer, unfortunately it died when the house was struck by lightning. It came with a dvd drive and Zork the Grand Inquisitor. I've found another Gateway GP6 and built a dual P3 tualatin into it.
You should have added a year or two and included the slot 1 Coppermine cpus. I have an Asus P2B-F that started life as a PII-266 in ‘98, then to a PII-400, then to the P3-800/100mhz, all on the same hardware. It just needed a board flash for the Coppermine CPU. 1 gig of RAM and it ran Windows 2000 like a champ. Still have it.
I absolutely love the AOpen AX6BC mainboard. I built my first system around that and a Pentium II - 400Mhz with 256MB RAM initially. I have several AOpen boards in this series from past adventures and am currently using the AOpen AX6B Pro in my win98 "Hobby PC" because that revision has onboard SCSI. Rock solid, stable, even all the way to 133MHz FSB. Also works with a Pentium III-1 GHz (my current configuration with a Voodoo2 and GeForce2 GTS card.) Great test system and hit me right in the nostalgia feels. 🤗
@@blackterminal Indeed. I got extremely lucky. A friend of mine was going to toss his old computer and I offered to help. This was before Pentiums were considered "retro". I planned to strip it for parts and keep everything except the proprietary stuff. To my surprise, there was a Voodoo 2 12mb card in there and not much else of interest at the time. I've had that card ever since.
@1:25 Viewers should know, that when us older users point at a 440bx chipset, we often point to the south bridge. Probably because it's uncovered, and easily recognizable as the 440bx's side kick to the south. The 440bx chipset is actually the larger chip under the heatsink near the CPU 😊 Phil definitely knows this. I am just poking fun at when we do that. I do it too lol.
Those heatsinks are a nightmare to remove. I only did it to one of em I had and broke 2 of the pins things. Placed new thermal paste and decided to not do it to the others I have.
Hi Phil, you did a lot of videos on Mendocino celerons, P2, Durons and Athlons, but I'm waiting for years for a video on Coppermine-128 based celerons. They were also amazing overclockers. Back in the day I had Celeron 566 on MSI BX Master mobo (with adapter) and not only it easily did 850 MHz (50% OC), but I used it on 952 MHz for everyday use, it could boot non-stable at 1050 MHz, and I think it was stable at 1030 MHz or something with voltage boost. But as I said I used it everyday on 952 MHz with no voltage boost. I know Duron was a little bit better, but I enjoyed my coppermine-128 Celeron so much. Phil, maybe you can make a video on some of these?
Coppermine Celerons are terrible. 566 will easily overclock to 850, but its performance will be approximately of PIII 700. 1Ghz Coppermine Celeron is about as fast as PIII 750. Given low prices of PIII CPUs, it's a waste of time to consider Celerons. I have plenty of them and only use them to test unknown boards. Either 1Ghz or 900 Mhz PIII should be used depending on whether the board is stable at 133Mhz FSB.
@@Alex-df4ltthey are not terrible. Only difference is 128kb cache. For non cache sensitive applications and at the same clockspeeds they perform %90 fast as pentium iii’s.
@@mtunayucer Nope, they also have lower cache associativity. The result is a terrible CPU even at 100Mhz FSB. I have tested 950-1000Ghz Celeron and PIII at various frequencies therefore I know they are a waste of time. Lot of heat for poor performance.
Absolutely best option for 1998 was Celeron 300a, which you could normally overclock to 450MHz. This overclocked Celeron actually marginally beats 450MHz PII and for the price difference back in the day, there really was nothing beating that humble celly. Back in the day I got my P2 400MHz before the release of 300a and I when I heard of the potential of 300a, I was extremely pissed of what seemed like wasting money on a ”real” P2, which was far better compared to previous Celerons. I took everything back few years ago and OCd 300a on my Abit BH6, so all is well now 🤣
C300a to 450 is like a default, you just set the FSB and it's done. If you don't use SCSI card then go to 112 FSB with /3 ratio to get 504 Mhz is also a no-brainer, it is really a solid puncher.
Abit BH6 + C300A was so great! When did You get 50% OC before or after? Today we get without extreme cooling what? 5%? World was different back then. Just saying... good times.
Definitely the best option at the time. It had less L2 cache than the P2 (128 vs 512), but the cache ran at full clock speed compared to the half clock L2 cache on the P2. Great at the time!
Oh the PII - one of the few cpus I've kept over the years..... loved using them, loved building with them (was my job for a while), and loved the look of them.
Cool! I just uploaded a video Reviewing a Premio Pc with a pentium II 300. Should be a bit worse than this one, but it's issue in the moment is the video card it came with, an ATI Rage IIc, which will be upgraded in the next video featuring the Premio. Nice video, thanks Phil.
There was a socket 370 adapter for the slot 1. A Tualatin CPU was adapted to that adapter. I had one. I had a dual slot 1 motherboard with dual Tualatin CPU. It was really nice at the time... Nicely done... =)
Probably the worst CPU would be a WinChip, which was basically an "overclocked" 486 or a MediaGX. If you thought that 30 FPS are bad, see when you go on these monsters.
Totally agree! In late 1998 my office colleague got new PC with IDT Winchip 200MHz and it was really horrible painfull compared to my new Celeron 300MHz (same Covington core as this in Phill test, without L2).
@@honzaplachy5040 I had upgraded my P133 to a WinChip-2 200 in 1998 and it runs fine with my pair of voodoo2. However the non-super7 platform is really a bad choice at that time if you buying a new computer. That’s why I got my C300a platform after doing some part time job during the summer break before I got in college.
IDT Winchip has nothing in common with the Cyrix MediaGX, they're not even made by the same company. The IDT Winchip was made by a company called Centaur Technology, the Cyrix MediaGX was based on a Cyrix 586, itself a cut down version of the Cyrix 686. All three aforementioned CPUs were actually very good, if you only needed to do integer math. Their bad reputation came from their poor x87 FPUs being slow and terrible for games. Cyrix's MediaGX lived on long after the demise of Cyrix with AMD, which rebranded it as the Geode. AMD did minor improvements to the Geode and sold them up until I think 2019. The VIA C3/C7, despite using Cyrix's name had nothing to do with Cyrix. VIA used another core design from Centaur Technology, which they bought along with Cyrix from the ashes of National Semiconductor in the late 90s.
@@GGigabiteM to be very fair, MediaGXm was quite bad as it wasn't also having the L2 cache (like the first Celerons) on the main board and also it has a quite pathetic bus (33 MHz). The cherry on top was just 16 KB cache, which was quite of a downgrade compared to 6x86MX or M2 (which had if I recall right up to 87 MHz bus, 64 L1, and L2 on main board, and in general more executing resources. The reason why Geode was popular was the low cost of producing them (and MediaGX series in general) given high levels of integration. If Phil is interested, I am quite skeptical that MediaGx would beat by much a WinChip if winning, but this is mostly because WinChip excluding the pathetic core, had many things on it's side: 66 MHz bus, 64 L1 and mainboard L2 cache. If I would be to bet, I would still bet on WinChip to be better overall, but by pathetic margins
I had Asus P2B with Pentium II 350MHz, then upgraded to P III 450MHz that would OC to over 500 MHz and then got Pentium III 866MHz Coppermine with an Slot 1 adapter. That Asus P2B motherboard was the best I ever had. For storage I had Adaptec 19160 SCSI controller with 3x Quantum 9GB 10k HDDs and Asus Nvidia Riva TNT2 Ultra 32MB. Man, that was some high end stuff at the time.
I have a PII 450 paired with a voodoo 3 in a gateway system that I snagged from a local e-cycler. It's a real blast for retro games, I'm happy I was able to save it.
Similar enough: I have a Pentium III 450MHz in a 440BX system. Without any charts I remember first using a Pentium II 333MHz(?) and the upgrade probably felt more significant than it actually was. Nice video btw! 👍
You reminded me to make a list of all my SLOT 1 cpus, and beside of two PII450s there was a unknown Pentium labeled one and when i dissasembled the cooler it was actualy a Celeron 300A. Label is glued over the hologram and looks like it was cut out of a magazine. That sticker boosted the performance by quite a bit probably.
The P2 450, the CPU that has always stayed in my memory as being the first CPU I ever saw that could run Microprose Grand Prix 2 maxed out at a decent frame rate :D
if im not mistaken chris taylor was part of the team that developed total annihilation , he then around 5 years later developed one of my favorite Action Rpgs of all time Dungeon siege
The PII 450 is my all time favourite retro CPU! I’m lucky enough to have a full case version of it in my collection along with a couple of the open case like your 450 in the 400MHz version.
I still Have my slot 1 system packed away. Its and ASUS MB and It had a P2 400 when I got it, but I eventually replaced it with a P3 800, and then overclocked to to become my first 1ghz machine. Still keeping it around incase I want to put together a retro gaming system, still got a stack of my 90s CDs.
Got plans to check out Celeron 300A? Or perhaps try plugging in a Tualatin 1.2GHz with a Socket 370 Slot 1 adapter? They were quite good on the i440BX chipset.
From my experience, it was not so much about the CPU or even GPU... But the manufacturer. There were lots of random manufacturers offering rock bottom quality mobos and even GPUs. Motherboards from brands like "Tomato" or "Surf" ... I had a Surf with my P166, when it died months later and switched to an Asus, it felt like my P166 was performing like a P75 until now. I also saw Geforce2 MXs unable to run NFS4 faster than 10fps. Maybe it would be a fun idea to assemble a retro PC with the worst quality components possible.
Yes, cheap motherboards in the 486 to Pentium II era were pretty bad. The power regulation especially could be an issue. Manufacturers were using switching voltage regulators that didn't switch fast enough, or linear voltage regulators that weren't linear enough. That was in addition to using the really lousy capacitors of that time period. There were some really good boards as well though. FIC, Shuttle, Chips and Technologies, and Intel all made good boards. BTW, I was building computers professionally in 1997 and 1998, generally about 3 a week. Most of them were AMD based, K6 and K6-II were the most popular. But we also did some Intel based machines if customers asked for them.
Chipset made such a difference, of course crappy components on motherboards didn't help but garbage chipsets from SiS and Via on cheap motherboard were a big problem at the time. I remember Via's K7 chipset was particularly unstable, you really wanted a board with an AMD or Intel chipet for their respective platforms.
I had the Celeron one back in '99 and I was switching to it from a 486 so I didn't even realize it was bad, it actually was an amazing upgrade for me at the time. Barely managed to get the money for that, the Pentium II would have probably been a fortune back then, no way I could have afforded it anyway.
In the summer of 1998 I had a Pentium II 400 and fortunately it had an open multiplier, ran smoothly for years at 450Mhz with the stock 2V voltage. Even 500MHz (5x multiplier) booted, but unstable, because it was a very early Deschutes stepping. A SL2S7, dA0 stepping, produced in June 98. Today, It's not so easy to find unlocked Deschute PII CPUs. The original 450s are always locked, in the old SECC1 and newer SECC2 Case, like phils PII 450 in the video.
Have you ever made a comparison video between a Celeron 300A (overclocked or not) and a Pentium II? I like the Slot1 form, it looks so different and our first PC had/has a Slot1 CPU so that's why I'm so fond of this type.
i sunk countless hours into skirmish on TA commander pack with the classic soundtrack playing in the background on a P2 366 laptop, i dont remember having bad performance issues at 1024x768, good times
Some Slot 1 motherboards have jumper switches that allow some Pentium II processors (all Klamath and some others that have unlocked multipliers) to be underclocked to as low as 133mhz w/L2 cache disabled or 166 and up w/L2 enabled. Makes for interesting DOS build possibilities.
I have that very same Aopen AX6BC motherboard bough new back in the day. At some point, I upgraded to a socket 370 P3 500 with an adapter slot card, and has been that way since then. Last year I downgraded the OS in a new drive going to Win98 from the XP that it had for regular use for years and years until recently as I used it to run a serial flash programmer that did not work elsewhere. Love that machine
Not quite a 450 but back in 1998 I had a PII 350 coupled with dual Voodoo 2 SLI on an Intel 440 board. It was the best of gaming times. The following year I naively purchased a PIII 800 (coppermine) as an upgrade but couldn't get it to work on the 440 and had to replace the board that had a VIA chipset. I recall being disappointed that gaming performance was only marginally better than the old 350 even though the clock speed was more than double.
Nice comparison vid. In fact, the Celeron A series processors were not quite as bad as you might think with the lack of L2 cache. In certain situations, overclocked Celeron A was faster than the equivalent Pentium 2. example: Celeron A 300 was able to use 100mhz bus speed at full speed while the 300mhz Pentium 2 was running at half speed because of limitations. In this situation, overclocked Celeron is faster, in heavy calculations Pentium 2 wins, but in game use Celeron was favorite of enthusiasts. :) My personal favorite of Slot 1 platform was 350mhz Pentium 2
This appears to be the case because the Pentium has longer pipelines than the celerons. This is also true between high end P3s and early P4s, again its pipeline length. This means early P4s make rather decent budget retro machines but little else. Athlons make better 98 machines if you want to go higher end. Particularly socket 754 or 939.
I remember back in the day having the celly 300a to 450 was like a minor diff. vs the p2 450. Like 1 a 2 % maybe? But the celly felt smoother in games. Its cuz of the full speed l2 cache I started to try out the AMD Duron. Instead of the older slot 1 pentium 3 with also slower l2 cache. Never regreted it.
Do you ever have issues with the Gotek flopy drives having the screw holes in the wrong placement on the outer plastic shell ?... I have had to drill new holes in all of mine, about 5 of them... all bought from different sources over time.
I was always fond of the slot 1 cpu's it was the time when games came out and that supported mmx and 3d accelerators were getting more utilitized and making actual use of it
PCChips sold the Celeron 266 Covington in a "Pentium II" labeled SECC enclosure hehe. I got pics of this CPU somewhere. Too bad cant attach them here. PCChips really fooled customers back then.
An interesting video might be comparing the first Slot A processors (Athlon 'Argon' 250nm/'Pluto' 180nm/'Orion' 180nm) vs full speed cache 'Thunderbird' 180nm cores. Of course Slot A stuff is kinda rare in the retro scene. A showdown between Slot A Athlons and Pentium 3 'Coppermine' might be pretty cool though, there was much arguing in 1999 if the first Athlon's asymmetric cache frequencies made it worse than Coppermine.
I am pretty sure I have the Pentium ll and a motherboard for it here. Makes me want to dig it out and play with it some. Thank you for another amazing video.
@@PhilipPetev Ah yes I forgot about that. I don't think it matters much for the retro gaming actually but maybe for someone that want to do semi modern tasks...
Very nice video again, Phil. For next Winters gaming would u pair a Pentium 4 3,2 ht or a Sempron 3000+ with a Radeon 2600 pro? I like socket 1. Actually i have a lot of hardware from that time.
I just dug through my collection, and found I own a slotted P2 400MHz! I'm extremely happy to know I own a high end P2. I have a whole bunch of P2 and P3 era socketed celerons but I currently have an XPS build with a P3 700MHz and a voodoo 3 in it, and an HP slimline with a P3 900MHz and intel extreme graphics but I'd like to add a PCI gpu to it. I'm learning so much about hardware from my childhood here and Pixel Pipes.
I use the P2-450 in one of my Retro Machines together with Rendition Verite V2200, PowerVR and Voodoo Graphics and Sound Blaster 16. All combined on the P2B-B Baby AT mainboard. The Tower I use is the one which had my Pentium 100 in it back in the day with V1 and later V3 and Pentium 200. The system as it is now is near noiseless with CF-Card as harddrive. I modified the Tower with better airflow and additional 80mm fan. The CPU is cooled by two 50mm fans which run on low RPM. The complete System runs very smooth and can handle a lot of games with the different APIs. This is my favorite Retrosystem beside my Voodoo 5 1400 Tualatin System.
in '99 on my bday and in preperation for the start of high school my dad bought me a new PC... PIII 450Mhz with a Voodoo 3. what an incredible era. i had no idea there was a PII 450MHz CPU at the time but was happy with my performance until winXP was anounced and i built a whole new Athlon XP 1700 PC with a Geforce 3 when that came out. I have a large collection of CPUs including PII and PIII 450Mhz, i want to test those two against each other and see how they fair! I have a lot of nostalgia for the Slot 1 platform as it was my most formative gaming years. I have the peak Slot 1 cpu... the PIII 1Ghz as well... what a long lived platform!
Great video. I think I need to find a new Slot 1 board. Mine is getting very sketchy. I probably should have a go at re-capping it even though they look fine. TA is such a great RTS.
First computer I every built from nothing was a PII 300 MMX circa 2000. I loved that system. I wish I could find one now and all the classic games I had like Warcraft, Diablo, Journeyman Project, Destruction Derby, Road Rash.
I have a p2 450 but it's one of those oem ones that just have a heatsink. I've cable tied 120mm case fans to it but it's insanely loud. I don't pull it out of the box much 😆
Interesting. I was wonder why I did not have any experience with Slot 1 and P2. I only used Socket 7 and Socket 370 later then. I remember I used K6 and Celeron 833Mhz.
Am I missing something? you mentioned that you would put something in the video description about playing Incoming? I can not seem to find it... am I blind?
On my slot 1 system, i have a p3 850. For what i play i just turn off the cache and run at 66fsb (566mhz) as needed. I have a p2 233 to swap as needed. It runs at 300mhz pretty well. Ive also get it to underclock at 133 mhz
Back in the days I used to have a P2 233... While it was the smallest one, and usually is never talked about. I think it was also one of the greatest CPUs of that line. It was affordable and overclockable. Had it running stable at 291 MHz all the time and it even went higher, if I remember it correctly, but with diminishing returns. Anyhow, what an interesting CPU-Format it was.
I remember ordering a pII 400 that was the fastest and the next month the 450 came out. I felt betrayed.. lol.. back then there was very little news/information as far as when or what was coming out next compared to todays updates via media outlets.
Nice video Phil. I've still got my P3 450 in a 98 MB/Machine but cannot use it because the hdd has failed. I'd like to get it up and running again but can't source small SSDs. Where did you get hold of one that you can trust?
The Celeron Covington 266 and 300 mhz actually were nice budget CPUs in early 1998 especially because they overclocked like crazy to FSB 100 and even more. With FSB 100 the 266 mhz version reached 400 mhz and the 300 mhz 450 mhz. At the same frequency the Celeron Covington had a very similar performance to the AMD K6-2 and Pentium 1 MMX (would be nice to see a comparison video Celeron Covington and Mendocino vs AMD K6-2 vs Pentium 1 MMX with a Voodoo 2 or V2 SLI). The Celeron Covington became obsolete just 2 months later when the Celeron Mendocino with 128 mb cache was released.
Many people already explained this in his last video about the Celerons in particular, but they never seem to get any attention unfortunately. I don’t know why he disparages them so harshly, I made a comment about how they made for great 16-bit gamers when paired with early 90s DOS and Windows 3.1 as a budget solution for a mobile laptop capable of such an OS with an active matrix display since they often have a terrible 2D video chip integrated (like a NeoMagic) which, he hearted. That’s how I repurposed an old Gateway Solo 2500 I bought off eBay as untested a few years back
I'm so tempted to buy a Slot 1 board so I can compare my socket 8 pentium 2 overdrive to some real pentium 2s. Maybe one day I'll pull the trigger. Very cool video. The late 90s was such a good time for innovation in the 3d accelerator and CPU space. .
Ahh, slot one.. From a time when upgrading your CPU meant you could double the speed of your PC. I think that, in combination with the fact that most modern PCs can handle at least general tasks and basic gaming without too much trouble,, means that even if you put a CPU in that is significantly faster, it won't feel that much faster..
I believe we had an Dell Dimension running a P2 350 mhz. Later we upgraded with a Geforce 2 mx. We had that system till we later went for an IBM with a P4, 1,8ghz. We actually got the wrong computer first which had a P4 2,2 ghz. One hour later the delivery guy called and explained the mistake. I was heartbroken 😂🤣
My very first tower PC was a hand-me-down from my Dad. It had a Pentium Pro 200Mhz, with a 1MB L2 cache. Running Windows 2000 Professional on an Intel motherboard. I think it had a 256MB GPU in it. But I could be wrong on the GPU. I used that PC for many years. From what he told me, it was very expensive at the time he built it. Several thousand dollars for the whole setup.
The i440 is so legendary. Its spirit lives on today in virtual machines due to being the default setting for new x86-64 VMs in Qemu and VMWare. There's probably billions+ of servers out there "running" on the i440 virtual chipset.
Yup, I maintain a 440BX Asus board with dual 800 MHz P-III Coppermine slot-1 CPUs for nostalgic purposes. It's bullet-proof and rock solid, never had a single issue with it, using multiple different vintage operating systems, with dozens of different vintage apps and games.
can run tualatins on it with a bit of tinkering as well - running mine at either 233MHz p2 or a 1.2GHz celeron p3 all just by slotting out the processor :)
I have a couple of those PII 450s running in a Dual Slot motherboard, and they were always fantastic!
Dual Slot even, wonderful!
Like! How about a Celeron vs Pentium MMX vs K6-2 video? I think it would be very intereresting since those CPUs were the most popular in 1998. Most people in 1998 had P1 MMX, Celeron and K6-2, the P2 was ridiculously expensive back then.
I remember choosing the k6-2 350 because in Italy a p2-350 was about 1/3 more of the price. Crazy expensive
I remember a while back his K6-3+ video that is able to bridge a lot of performance. You'll get around 450 MHz Pentium speed at the top, but can turn off the cache and reduce the multi in software and get pretty close to 386 speed.
agreed! ♥
Nothing is more comfy in a little hangover than taking a cold beer and watching a new Phil video.
I have that same motherboard. The "LOAD SETUP DEFAULTS" (which is the same as clearing CMOS), set the "IDE HDD Block Mode" as Disabled, with a huge performance impact in Disc Drives. "TURBO DEFAULT" set it to Enabled for faster access.
Wow that board is the perfect balance of old and new ports. APG,PCI and a pair of ISA
There is no APG slot.
@@CougarCat21 1:32 2 ISA slots 5 PCI slots and a APG slot
@@CougarCat21Your correction of typos must make you real fun to be around.
This system with a Elsa Victory II was my first computer in 1998, when I was 13. It was the most exciting moment in my short life, when i got this. I only left my room for the toilet and food for a whole week!
That's awesome 😎
Man, you was luckiest kid on the planet! I know the feeling, I had exactly the same start in late 90s. Was great period for computer games to be alive
In 1998 I got a PII 350, 32GB PC-100 SDRAM, 8GB HDD Pre-Built. It came with Sound Blaster compatible sound on the board and built in AGP x2 Rage 128 Pro graphics. I upped it to 512MB PC-100, 20GB Maxtor 7200RPM HDD and a Voodoo 2 3000. I got the base unit from Gateway. It was the first last and only pre-built I have ever purchased. It was an enormous step up from my P233 MMX, So much so I couldn't believe it. GL Quake was amazing. UltraHLE was amazing, really anything I threw at it for the next 2 years was amazing. I recently got a few from a recycler for free, including 2 PII 450s, a PII 350 and one of the odd 66 Mhz FSB PII 366 models. Weird those models. They perform like an un-gimped Celeron. I also received the Celeron you reviewed last video as well as the socketed model from after the PIII launch. I loved that PII 350 so much that after I ordered the parts to build an Athlon system I didn't build it right away. I finished all the games I was playing on my PII 350 before I did. The last game I beat was FFVIII. Then I moved onto the Athlon as Max Payne played ok on the PII 350 but I knew it would scream on the Athlon. I also OCed that PII 350 to 450 Mhz. It was stable and worked fine. I put a larger, faster fan on the CPU box but I don't think it was necessary, just precautionary. At that time I also received a PIII 1 Ghz system as a tip from a customer. Yes, an entire PC, monitor, mouse, keyboard, printer and some extras. He said he was going to put it into the trash otherwise. This was a very wealthy person. I then set up to test all three and concluded the Athlon T-Bird was going to be my battlestation, the PIII was going in the living room and I gave the PII 350 to my adopted son. He needed something to keep him out of trouble and that was the ticket.
Thanks for sharing!
@philscomputerlab It was long, so thank you for taking the time to read it!
@@Trick-Framed I love reading such nuggets of computer experiences 🙂
@@philscomputerlab Me too!
My family also got the PII 350 Gateway tower. That was a sweet computer, unfortunately it died when the house was struck by lightning. It came with a dvd drive and Zork the Grand Inquisitor. I've found another Gateway GP6 and built a dual P3 tualatin into it.
You should have added a year or two and included the slot 1 Coppermine cpus. I have an Asus P2B-F that started life as a PII-266 in ‘98, then to a PII-400, then to the P3-800/100mhz, all on the same hardware. It just needed a board flash for the Coppermine CPU. 1 gig of RAM and it ran Windows 2000 like a champ. Still have it.
I absolutely love the AOpen AX6BC mainboard. I built my first system around that and a Pentium II - 400Mhz with 256MB RAM initially.
I have several AOpen boards in this series from past adventures and am currently using the AOpen AX6B Pro in my win98 "Hobby PC" because that revision has onboard SCSI.
Rock solid, stable, even all the way to 133MHz FSB. Also works with a Pentium III-1 GHz (my current configuration with a Voodoo2 and GeForce2 GTS card.)
Great test system and hit me right in the nostalgia feels. 🤗
Voodoo=$$$
@@blackterminal Indeed. I got extremely lucky. A friend of mine was going to toss his old computer and I offered to help. This was before Pentiums were considered "retro". I planned to strip it for parts and keep everything except the proprietary stuff.
To my surprise, there was a Voodoo 2 12mb card in there and not much else of interest at the time. I've had that card ever since.
perfect weekend start with a video from phil 🤩👍
@1:25 Viewers should know, that when us older users point at a 440bx chipset, we often point to the south bridge. Probably because it's uncovered, and easily recognizable as the 440bx's side kick to the south. The 440bx chipset is actually the larger chip under the heatsink near the CPU 😊 Phil definitely knows this. I am just poking fun at when we do that. I do it too lol.
You are right 👍
Those heatsinks are a nightmare to remove. I only did it to one of em I had and broke 2 of the pins things. Placed new thermal paste and decided to not do it to the others I have.
Slot 1 CPUs don't get that hot anyway.
@@TheCrazyparrot8 yeah. Until the CPU fan pins slip out and you don't notice it.
Really enjoyed this one Phil! Keep up the great work 👏
So great to see this channel keep going! Been here from the beginning.
Awesome! Thank you!
I absolutely love your voice - I gave up on vintage PC long ago but keep returning to your channel and it has a nostalgic feeling here
Wow, thank you!
Happy Friday Phil! I have the Pentium II 450 in my Deskpro EN system paired with a Voodoo 3. It’s a great retro system with that CPU.
Hi Phil, you did a lot of videos on Mendocino celerons, P2, Durons and Athlons, but I'm waiting for years for a video on Coppermine-128 based celerons. They were also amazing overclockers. Back in the day I had Celeron 566 on MSI BX Master mobo (with adapter) and not only it easily did 850 MHz (50% OC), but I used it on 952 MHz for everyday use, it could boot non-stable at 1050 MHz, and I think it was stable at 1030 MHz or something with voltage boost. But as I said I used it everyday on 952 MHz with no voltage boost. I know Duron was a little bit better, but I enjoyed my coppermine-128 Celeron so much. Phil, maybe you can make a video on some of these?
Coppermine Celerons are terrible. 566 will easily overclock to 850, but its performance will be approximately of PIII 700. 1Ghz Coppermine Celeron is about as fast as PIII 750. Given low prices of PIII CPUs, it's a waste of time to consider Celerons. I have plenty of them and only use them to test unknown boards. Either 1Ghz or 900 Mhz PIII should be used depending on whether the board is stable at 133Mhz FSB.
@@Alex-df4ltthey are not terrible. Only difference is 128kb cache. For non cache sensitive applications and at the same clockspeeds they perform %90 fast as pentium iii’s.
@@mtunayucer Nope, they also have lower cache associativity. The result is a terrible CPU even at 100Mhz FSB. I have tested 950-1000Ghz Celeron and PIII at various frequencies therefore I know they are a waste of time. Lot of heat for poor performance.
I had a bad PIII 850 back in the day. It took a long time to discover it couldn't run at stock, untill I dropped it to 566mhz.
@@wag-on maybe mobo gave a lower voltage than supposed to
I love that you use a flight stick to play Incoming. Which, if I hadn't said it before, is a great looking game, especially for it's time.
Absolutely best option for 1998 was Celeron 300a, which you could normally overclock to 450MHz. This overclocked Celeron actually marginally beats 450MHz PII and for the price difference back in the day, there really was nothing beating that humble celly. Back in the day I got my P2 400MHz before the release of 300a and I when I heard of the potential of 300a, I was extremely pissed of what seemed like wasting money on a ”real” P2, which was far better compared to previous Celerons. I took everything back few years ago and OCd 300a on my Abit BH6, so all is well now 🤣
C300a to 450 is like a default, you just set the FSB and it's done. If you don't use SCSI card then go to 112 FSB with /3 ratio to get 504 Mhz is also a no-brainer, it is really a solid puncher.
Celeron 366A was a good option for overcklocking too, perhaps not as fast fsb but it had higher chance to exceed 500mhz.
I overclocked my 300a to 112*4.5=504 MHz and it run fine
Abit BH6 + C300A was so great! When did You get 50% OC before or after? Today we get without extreme cooling what? 5%? World was different back then. Just saying... good times.
Definitely the best option at the time. It had less L2 cache than the P2 (128 vs 512), but the cache ran at full clock speed compared to the half clock L2 cache on the P2. Great at the time!
Keep it up! I have V1-V5 Collection in Original Boxes. And 3 Retro PCs. 233MMX + V1 , P2 450 + V2 Sli, P3 1100 + V5500. Greets from Switzerland
Very nice!
Great content and comparison. 👍
Thanks! 👍
Oh the PII - one of the few cpus I've kept over the years..... loved using them, loved building with them (was my job for a while), and loved the look of them.
I also dig the slot format and its my favorite of all time. I now have 4 slot 1 cpus!
Breakfast with Phil again! In GL Quake I could get a locked 60 FPS with V-Sync on and it was glorious.
Very cool! Recently picked up a PIII 500/512/100 slot 1, looking forward to putting the system together!
Only good enough for DOS or early Windows 98 games. For late Windows 98 games you need PIII 750, or better 900-1Ghz.
Good Morning. Welcome to Philday. I too have a slot 1 motherboard with i440 I believe.
Hello there!
Cool! I just uploaded a video Reviewing a Premio Pc with a pentium II 300. Should be a bit worse than this one, but it's issue in the moment is the video card it came with, an ATI Rage IIc, which will be upgraded in the next video featuring the Premio. Nice video, thanks Phil.
PII 450 was a beast. Nothing but great things for it. When it came out I was still sporting a Cyrix 150 and just drooled over my friends 450.
There was a socket 370 adapter for the slot 1. A Tualatin CPU was adapted to that adapter. I had one. I had a dual slot 1 motherboard with dual Tualatin CPU. It was really nice at the time... Nicely done... =)
Yes! These Slot 1 adapters are awesome!
My god I'm so old! I remember when this was new. I paid a fortune on my pentiumII I even got a loan from the bank.
Probably the worst CPU would be a WinChip, which was basically an "overclocked" 486 or a MediaGX. If you thought that 30 FPS are bad, see when you go on these monsters.
Totally agree! In late 1998 my office colleague got new PC with IDT Winchip 200MHz and it was really horrible painfull compared to my new Celeron 300MHz (same Covington core as this in Phill test, without L2).
MediaGX was soooooo bad RIP Cyrix
@@honzaplachy5040 I had upgraded my P133 to a WinChip-2 200 in 1998 and it runs fine with my pair of voodoo2. However the non-super7 platform is really a bad choice at that time if you buying a new computer. That’s why I got my C300a platform after doing some part time job during the summer break before I got in college.
IDT Winchip has nothing in common with the Cyrix MediaGX, they're not even made by the same company.
The IDT Winchip was made by a company called Centaur Technology, the Cyrix MediaGX was based on a Cyrix 586, itself a cut down version of the Cyrix 686. All three aforementioned CPUs were actually very good, if you only needed to do integer math. Their bad reputation came from their poor x87 FPUs being slow and terrible for games.
Cyrix's MediaGX lived on long after the demise of Cyrix with AMD, which rebranded it as the Geode. AMD did minor improvements to the Geode and sold them up until I think 2019.
The VIA C3/C7, despite using Cyrix's name had nothing to do with Cyrix. VIA used another core design from Centaur Technology, which they bought along with Cyrix from the ashes of National Semiconductor in the late 90s.
@@GGigabiteM to be very fair, MediaGXm was quite bad as it wasn't also having the L2 cache (like the first Celerons) on the main board and also it has a quite pathetic bus (33 MHz). The cherry on top was just 16 KB cache, which was quite of a downgrade compared to 6x86MX or M2 (which had if I recall right up to 87 MHz bus, 64 L1, and L2 on main board, and in general more executing resources.
The reason why Geode was popular was the low cost of producing them (and MediaGX series in general) given high levels of integration.
If Phil is interested, I am quite skeptical that MediaGx would beat by much a WinChip if winning, but this is mostly because WinChip excluding the pathetic core, had many things on it's side: 66 MHz bus, 64 L1 and mainboard L2 cache.
If I would be to bet, I would still bet on WinChip to be better overall, but by pathetic margins
I had Asus P2B with Pentium II 350MHz, then upgraded to P III 450MHz that would OC to over 500 MHz and then got Pentium III 866MHz Coppermine with an Slot 1 adapter. That Asus P2B motherboard was the best I ever had. For storage I had Adaptec 19160 SCSI controller with 3x Quantum 9GB 10k HDDs and Asus Nvidia Riva TNT2 Ultra 32MB. Man, that was some high end stuff at the time.
I have a PII 450 paired with a voodoo 3 in a gateway system that I snagged from a local e-cycler. It's a real blast for retro games, I'm happy I was able to save it.
Similar enough: I have a Pentium III 450MHz in a 440BX system. Without any charts I remember first using a Pentium II 333MHz(?) and the upgrade probably felt more significant than it actually was.
Nice video btw! 👍
I have a Dell XPS 440BX myself. I have a P3 700MHz in it, and 1GHz ones are like $10 go get one if you need more performance.
Wait. There is a Pentium TWO? I need to upgrade from my Socket 7 daily driver now!
@@vardekpetrovic9716 O_O Time to head to Future Shop or CompUSA to pick these up right away!
Good video. Love the slot one platform. Later the flip chip p3 with a socket 370 to slot one adapter for as awesome.
You reminded me to make a list of all my SLOT 1 cpus, and beside of two PII450s there was a unknown Pentium labeled one and when i dissasembled the cooler it was actualy a Celeron 300A. Label is glued over the hologram and looks like it was cut out of a magazine. That sticker boosted the performance by quite a bit probably.
The P2 450, the CPU that has always stayed in my memory as being the first CPU I ever saw that could run Microprose Grand Prix 2 maxed out at a decent frame rate :D
if im not mistaken chris taylor was part of the team that developed total annihilation , he then around 5 years later developed one of my favorite Action Rpgs of all time Dungeon siege
If you talk about 1995-2000 hardware I love you
My first cpu was a i486 DX2 66MHz. When I bought a new computer with a P2 350MHz in 1998 I was highfiving myself with joy.
The PII 450 is my all time favourite retro CPU! I’m lucky enough to have a full case version of it in my collection along with a couple of the open case like your 450 in the 400MHz version.
I used to have the full case one on a Abit BH6 with 384MB PC-100.
Same. Big nostalgia for this CPU. I have two machines running it, one dual CPU. (I also have a four-way 450 Mhz Drake Xeon rig).
Why do some only have half the case?
@@blackterminal not really sure. Might have been production cost efficiency related (less plastic etc.)
I still Have my slot 1 system packed away. Its and ASUS MB and It had a P2 400 when I got it, but I eventually replaced it with a P3 800, and then overclocked to to become my first 1ghz machine. Still keeping it around incase I want to put together a retro gaming system, still got a stack of my 90s CDs.
Got plans to check out Celeron 300A? Or perhaps try plugging in a Tualatin 1.2GHz with a Socket 370 Slot 1 adapter? They were quite good on the i440BX chipset.
If he's going to play with a Celeron 300A he needs an Abit BP6 and two of them!
From my experience, it was not so much about the CPU or even GPU... But the manufacturer. There were lots of random manufacturers offering rock bottom quality mobos and even GPUs. Motherboards from brands like "Tomato" or "Surf" ... I had a Surf with my P166, when it died months later and switched to an Asus, it felt like my P166 was performing like a P75 until now. I also saw Geforce2 MXs unable to run NFS4 faster than 10fps.
Maybe it would be a fun idea to assemble a retro PC with the worst quality components possible.
worst quality components build? Sounds like my youth 😂
Yes, cheap motherboards in the 486 to Pentium II era were pretty bad. The power regulation especially could be an issue. Manufacturers were using switching voltage regulators that didn't switch fast enough, or linear voltage regulators that weren't linear enough. That was in addition to using the really lousy capacitors of that time period.
There were some really good boards as well though. FIC, Shuttle, Chips and Technologies, and Intel all made good boards.
BTW, I was building computers professionally in 1997 and 1998, generally about 3 a week. Most of them were AMD based, K6 and K6-II were the most popular. But we also did some Intel based machines if customers asked for them.
@@harleyn3089 those "intel customers" were those wuth the deeper pockets...right? 🤭
@@tagesvaterpatrick8780 Usually, yes. Intel tended to be a lot more expensive in the 1990s than AMD.
Chipset made such a difference, of course crappy components on motherboards didn't help but garbage chipsets from SiS and Via on cheap motherboard were a big problem at the time. I remember Via's K7 chipset was particularly unstable, you really wanted a board with an AMD or Intel chipet for their respective platforms.
Fab comparison! I love the pII. A dell 266 was the first new machine I bought with money. Would love a 450, think 350 is the fastest one I have.
Any possible way to *Slocket* in a Tualatin?
Yes but needs to be one with adjustable voltage and Tualatin support.
Phil can always surprise us with a game I never ever heard of like Incoming :D
I had the Celeron one back in '99 and I was switching to it from a 486 so I didn't even realize it was bad, it actually was an amazing upgrade for me at the time.
Barely managed to get the money for that, the Pentium II would have probably been a fortune back then, no way I could have afforded it anyway.
In the summer of 1998 I had a Pentium II 400 and fortunately it had an open multiplier, ran smoothly for years at 450Mhz with the stock 2V voltage. Even 500MHz (5x multiplier) booted, but unstable, because it was a very early Deschutes stepping. A SL2S7, dA0 stepping, produced in June 98.
Today, It's not so easy to find unlocked Deschute PII CPUs. The original 450s are always locked, in the old SECC1 and newer SECC2 Case, like phils PII 450 in the video.
Have you ever made a comparison video between a Celeron 300A (overclocked or not) and a Pentium II?
I like the Slot1 form, it looks so different and our first PC had/has a Slot1 CPU so that's why I'm so fond of this type.
Yes there is a video on the Celeron 300A.
i sunk countless hours into skirmish on TA commander pack with the classic soundtrack playing in the background on a P2 366 laptop, i dont remember having bad performance issues at 1024x768, good times
Some Slot 1 motherboards have jumper switches that allow some Pentium II processors (all Klamath and some others that have unlocked multipliers) to be underclocked to as low as 133mhz w/L2 cache disabled or 166 and up w/L2 enabled. Makes for interesting DOS build possibilities.
My fist PC processor was K6-2 on 360Mhz or something. I played Diablo 1 without problem and I learned the RPGs don't require much recourses.
3:37 why not just have PS/2 adapters?
Those only work with very few USB input devices.
Ah. Good to know!
In just one year your computer was not that great anymore, crazy times
Yes exactly! Nothing like these days...
and they were relatively so much more expensive!
I have that very same Aopen AX6BC motherboard bough new back in the day. At some point, I upgraded to a socket 370 P3 500 with an adapter slot card, and has been that way since then.
Last year I downgraded the OS in a new drive going to Win98 from the XP that it had for regular use for years and years until recently as I used it to run a serial flash programmer that did not work elsewhere. Love that machine
Not quite a 450 but back in 1998 I had a PII 350 coupled with dual Voodoo 2 SLI on an Intel 440 board. It was the best of gaming times.
The following year I naively purchased a PIII 800 (coppermine) as an upgrade but couldn't get it to work on the 440 and had to replace the board that had a VIA chipset. I recall being disappointed that gaming performance was only marginally better than the old 350 even though the clock speed was more than double.
VIA chipset likely to blame as the 800 is quite a bit faster.
Nice comparison vid. In fact, the Celeron A series processors were not quite as bad as you might think with the lack of L2 cache. In certain situations, overclocked Celeron A was faster than the equivalent Pentium 2. example: Celeron A 300 was able to use 100mhz bus speed at full speed while the 300mhz Pentium 2 was running at half speed because of limitations. In this situation, overclocked Celeron is faster, in heavy calculations Pentium 2 wins, but in game use Celeron was favorite of enthusiasts. :)
My personal favorite of Slot 1 platform was 350mhz Pentium 2
This appears to be the case because the Pentium has longer pipelines than the celerons. This is also true between high end P3s and early P4s, again its pipeline length. This means early P4s make rather decent budget retro machines but little else. Athlons make better 98 machines if you want to go higher end. Particularly socket 754 or 939.
I remember back in the day having the celly 300a to 450 was like a minor diff. vs the p2 450. Like 1 a 2 % maybe? But the celly felt smoother in games.
Its cuz of the full speed l2 cache I started to try out the AMD Duron. Instead of the older slot 1 pentium 3 with also slower l2 cache. Never regreted it.
Do you ever have issues with the Gotek flopy drives having the screw holes in the wrong placement on the outer plastic shell ?... I have had to drill new holes in all of mine, about 5 of them... all bought from different sources over time.
That's interesting. Well I don't work with Cass most of the time but didn't have issues the few times I used one.
Had a P2 450 and that board back in the days ❤
I was always fond of the slot 1 cpu's it was the time when games came out and that supported mmx and 3d accelerators were getting more utilitized and making actual use of it
your work is true my friend phils :)❣
Wow, thank you
PCChips sold the Celeron 266 Covington in a "Pentium II" labeled SECC enclosure hehe. I got pics of this CPU somewhere. Too bad cant attach them here. PCChips really fooled customers back then.
An interesting video might be comparing the first Slot A processors (Athlon 'Argon' 250nm/'Pluto' 180nm/'Orion' 180nm) vs full speed cache 'Thunderbird' 180nm cores. Of course Slot A stuff is kinda rare in the retro scene.
A showdown between Slot A Athlons and Pentium 3 'Coppermine' might be pretty cool though, there was much arguing in 1999 if the first Athlon's asymmetric cache frequencies made it worse than Coppermine.
Did these come in orange boxes brand new?
The Celeron 266 was still faster than my Pentium 200 MMX. P2s came out 3 months after my dad bought the MMX and my heart was broken 🤣😭
Got P3 1GHz on MSI BxMaster love it.
Pentium II 450MHz was so fast in1998 compared with all CPUs available in 1996... Amazing jump from Intel!
I am pretty sure I have the Pentium ll and a motherboard for it here. Makes me want to dig it out and play with it some. Thank you for another amazing video.
Go for it!
How does the Covington hold up against the K6, K6-2 and K6-3's?
P2/450 is pretty hard to find, yes, but P3/450 is a good alternative and can be still found relatively easy.
Yes they are basically identical in performance!
@@philscomputerlab The only notable difference is P3 has SSE instructions. The rest is pretty much the same.
@@PhilipPetev Ah yes I forgot about that. I don't think it matters much for the retro gaming actually but maybe for someone that want to do semi modern tasks...
Yeah i stopped hunting for p2 450. Now i have p2 400 and p3 450 :D
Note that Coppermines run cooler than Katmais of the same frequency. This is good for hardware preservation.
Very nice video again, Phil. For next Winters gaming would u pair a Pentium 4 3,2 ht or a Sempron 3000+ with a Radeon 2600 pro? I like socket 1. Actually i have a lot of hardware from that time.
I just dug through my collection, and found I own a slotted P2 400MHz! I'm extremely happy to know I own a high end P2. I have a whole bunch of P2 and P3 era socketed celerons but I currently have an XPS build with a P3 700MHz and a voodoo 3 in it, and an HP slimline with a P3 900MHz and intel extreme graphics but I'd like to add a PCI gpu to it.
I'm learning so much about hardware from my childhood here and Pixel Pipes.
I use the P2-450 in one of my Retro Machines together with Rendition Verite V2200, PowerVR and Voodoo Graphics and Sound Blaster 16. All combined on the P2B-B Baby AT mainboard. The Tower I use is the one which had my Pentium 100 in it back in the day with V1 and later V3 and Pentium 200. The system as it is now is near noiseless with CF-Card as harddrive. I modified the Tower with better airflow and additional 80mm fan. The CPU is cooled by two 50mm fans which run on low RPM. The complete System runs very smooth and can handle a lot of games with the different APIs. This is my favorite Retrosystem beside my Voodoo 5 1400 Tualatin System.
in '99 on my bday and in preperation for the start of high school my dad bought me a new PC... PIII 450Mhz with a Voodoo 3. what an incredible era. i had no idea there was a PII 450MHz CPU at the time but was happy with my performance until winXP was anounced and i built a whole new Athlon XP 1700 PC with a Geforce 3 when that came out. I have a large collection of CPUs including PII and PIII 450Mhz, i want to test those two against each other and see how they fair! I have a lot of nostalgia for the Slot 1 platform as it was my most formative gaming years. I have the peak Slot 1 cpu... the PIII 1Ghz as well... what a long lived platform!
Great video. I think I need to find a new Slot 1 board. Mine is getting very sketchy. I probably should have a go at re-capping it even though they look fine.
TA is such a great RTS.
First computer I every built from nothing was a PII 300 MMX circa 2000. I loved that system. I wish I could find one now and all the classic games I had like Warcraft, Diablo, Journeyman Project, Destruction Derby, Road Rash.
I have a p2 450 but it's one of those oem ones that just have a heatsink. I've cable tied 120mm case fans to it but it's insanely loud. I don't pull it out of the box much 😆
Very difficult to find and pricy. I went the P2 300 SL2W8 way. Just set FSB to 66 up to 100 and you have a P2 450 for basicaly nothing.
That is the CPU I bought back in 1998 just for that reason and it worked perfectly, saving a lot of money :-)
Interesting. I was wonder why I did not have any experience with Slot 1 and P2. I only used Socket 7 and Socket 370 later then. I remember I used K6 and Celeron 833Mhz.
Am I missing something? you mentioned that you would put something in the video description about playing Incoming? I can not seem to find it... am I blind?
The motherboards I used back in Australia was Octek and Octek graphic cards.
On my slot 1 system, i have a p3 850. For what i play i just turn off the cache and run at 66fsb (566mhz) as needed.
I have a p2 233 to swap as needed. It runs at 300mhz pretty well. Ive also get it to underclock at 133 mhz
Hi, Phil, have you abandoned a video about supersampling on Nvidia cards?
Nope still want to cover it at some.point!
Back in the days I used to have a P2 233... While it was the smallest one, and usually is never talked about. I think it was also one of the greatest CPUs of that line. It was affordable and overclockable. Had it running stable at 291 MHz all the time and it even went higher, if I remember it correctly, but with diminishing returns. Anyhow, what an interesting CPU-Format it was.
I remember ordering a pII 400 that was the fastest and the next month the 450 came out. I felt betrayed.. lol.. back then there was very little news/information as far as when or what was coming out next compared to todays updates via media outlets.
I used to love a dual P3 system I had growing up, please build one!
how about comparing the revised Celeron "A"-Models, especialy the 300A with its 50% OC per upping the FSB from 66Mhz to 100Mhz?
Nice video Phil. I've still got my P3 450 in a 98 MB/Machine but cannot use it because the hdd has failed. I'd like to get it up and running again but can't source small SSDs. Where did you get hold of one that you can trust?
You can try buying used SSDs, these are available in smaller capacities!
The Celeron Covington 266 and 300 mhz actually were nice budget CPUs in early 1998 especially because they overclocked like crazy to FSB 100 and even more. With FSB 100 the 266 mhz version reached 400 mhz and the 300 mhz 450 mhz. At the same frequency the Celeron Covington had a very similar performance to the AMD K6-2 and Pentium 1 MMX (would be nice to see a comparison video Celeron Covington and Mendocino vs AMD K6-2 vs Pentium 1 MMX with a Voodoo 2 or V2 SLI). The Celeron Covington became obsolete just 2 months later when the Celeron Mendocino with 128 mb cache was released.
Many people already explained this in his last video about the Celerons in particular, but they never seem to get any attention unfortunately. I don’t know why he disparages them so harshly, I made a comment about how they made for great 16-bit gamers when paired with early 90s DOS and Windows 3.1 as a budget solution for a mobile laptop capable of such an OS with an active matrix display since they often have a terrible 2D video chip integrated (like a NeoMagic) which, he hearted. That’s how I repurposed an old Gateway Solo 2500 I bought off eBay as untested a few years back
I'm so tempted to buy a Slot 1 board so I can compare my socket 8 pentium 2 overdrive to some real pentium 2s. Maybe one day I'll pull the trigger. Very cool video.
The late 90s was such a good time for innovation in the 3d accelerator and CPU space. .
Ahh, slot one.. From a time when upgrading your CPU meant you could double the speed of your PC. I think that, in combination with the fact that most modern PCs can handle at least general tasks and basic gaming without too much trouble,, means that even if you put a CPU in that is significantly faster, it won't feel that much faster..
Depends, AM4 you can go from a ZEN1 1200 to a 5800x3D and you will sure notice the difference!
I believe we had an Dell Dimension running a P2 350 mhz. Later we upgraded with a Geforce 2 mx.
We had that system till we later went for an IBM with a P4, 1,8ghz. We actually got the wrong computer first which had a P4 2,2 ghz. One hour later the delivery guy called and explained the mistake. I was heartbroken 😂🤣
Now you have to do comparisson with the Celeron 300a (standard and oveclocked)... I sold my PII 350MHz to get a 300a and it was awesome.
My very first tower PC was a hand-me-down from my Dad. It had a Pentium Pro 200Mhz, with a 1MB L2 cache. Running Windows 2000 Professional on an Intel motherboard. I think it had a 256MB GPU in it. But I could be wrong on the GPU. I used that PC for many years. From what he told me, it was very expensive at the time he built it. Several thousand dollars for the whole setup.
I have fond memories of my PII 300 back in the day.
1998 i had P-II 333mhz Katmai Core, with Asus P2B-B BX440 chipset, but AT Style motherboard, from 2003 till today i never saw one again...
I have never ever even SEEN one! The best I've ever had was a 400Mhz. I guess they're pretty rare now.
Yes as it's the highest model they are collectibles.