Why You Don't Want X-Ray Vision

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4,2 тис.

  • @becausescience
    @becausescience  6 років тому +1132

    Thanks for watching! Loved how the animations for this one turned out. I'll answer this in the next Footnotes, but apparently I'm in the minority of people that assumed that x-ray vision actually used x-rays. I would have guessed guess that if you asked 100 people how "x-ray vision" worked 99 would say "x-rays," and that's my point. If we try to think about the power scientifically, would we want it? If x-ray vision is just a term without a definition, we can't even start!
    Also, Wifi-vision, giving how many cell phones are on the planet, would absolutely give you The Dark Knight-like vision. -- KH

    • @Anonymus56o
      @Anonymus56o 6 років тому +11

      Wifi-glasses. You mean Google glass?

    • @the4thElement88
      @the4thElement88 6 років тому +4

      @3:50 we should be heroic with this power but you'd know what most would do tho haha!

    • @MB-xo2lx
      @MB-xo2lx 6 років тому +1

      So the predator's heat vision is fine, since some snakes can see in the infrared spectre.

    • @Sheol02
      @Sheol02 6 років тому +9

      Many people actually read/watch fiction and go/went to school.
      X-Ray Vision is a term and it has it's definition - it's a superpower that allows to see through solid objects. If you want to talk about the power scientifically, then talk about power. Otherwise, well, can't for you explaining how Human Torch isn't an actual torch, Silver Surfer isn't made out of silver and Iron Man not only isn't himself made of Iron, but also isn't even wearing a suit made of iron (although he might have been at some point, because comics).

    • @justintyme5081
      @justintyme5081 6 років тому +1

      With the hint from foot notes I thought this was going to be anime eyes but this works to thanks for the great video 👍

  • @becausescience
    @becausescience  6 років тому +2841

    B O N E S H A D O W

    • @emptysheetofpaper9420
      @emptysheetofpaper9420 6 років тому +32

      E R ?

    • @matheuswohl
      @matheuswohl 6 років тому +16

      BoNe ShAdOw

    • @Nightfoxx21
      @Nightfoxx21 6 років тому +16

      Love the old Diablo Style fonts on this. very metal! I can see Kyle LARPing as a Diablo necromancer and all his Bone Shadow minions....

    • @DarqStalker
      @DarqStalker 6 років тому +11

      I found my new gamertag

    • @nathanrussell9512
      @nathanrussell9512 6 років тому +2

      Muskwatch music how lazy 😂 speaking of whens the next episode of that?

  • @FacelessMage117
    @FacelessMage117 6 років тому +725

    Most importantly, if you could see WiFi radiation, you would be the single best superhero ever, allowing people to find a strong WiFi signal no matter where they were....You could become a god at airports for instance.

    • @chromaticswing9199
      @chromaticswing9199 6 років тому +64

      "God of airports..."
      I'm keeping that in mind.

    • @John73John
      @John73John 6 років тому +53

      Not only that, being able to see and interpret wifi signals with that degree of precision would likely allow you to decode them. In other words you could read the data being sent/receives by everyone around you.
      Look, in that chair! It’s a creep! It’s a pervert! No, it’s... NSA Man!

    • @FacelessMage117
      @FacelessMage117 6 років тому +13

      WiFi signals are encrypted, if you were able to pull any info at all, which is unlikely, it would just be a hash of random bits.

    • @mattmk476
      @mattmk476 6 років тому

      Poor shit

    • @cjwrench07
      @cjwrench07 6 років тому +18

      Or, going through peoples houses, for a fee, and showing them all the dead spots in their house. Or, whether they would need repeaters to reach the upper/lower floors.

  • @akromakroma
    @akromakroma 6 років тому +441

    Us, living in 2018: we want x-ray vision
    Kyle, living in 3018: nah bro you want wi-fi vision

    • @capitanspoiler7393
      @capitanspoiler7393 6 років тому +13

      why would the sodium bromate want wifi vision?

    • @samon101
      @samon101 6 років тому +1

      jesus capitan spoiler, i can't believe u made this joke...

    • @crisagrm9665
      @crisagrm9665 6 років тому +4

      I would say us living in 1980 want xray vision and kyle in 2018 wants wifi vision.

  • @battleframestudios8989
    @battleframestudios8989 5 років тому +851

    "You're seeing through cloths maybe but not walls."
    Me: I see this as an absolute win!

    • @dayved5508
      @dayved5508 4 роки тому +46

      What if an old man stands in front of u

    • @battleframestudios8989
      @battleframestudios8989 4 роки тому +118

      @@dayved5508 You'd like that wouldn't you...

    • @dayved5508
      @dayved5508 4 роки тому +17

      @@battleframestudios8989 idk

    • @Jasonhadjigeorgiou
      @Jasonhadjigeorgiou 4 роки тому +6

      @@dayved5508 in morse code, you can speak.

    • @gaminganimators7000
      @gaminganimators7000 3 роки тому +1

      @@dayved5508 why is your name so long, I can't read the replies

  • @TMWriting
    @TMWriting 6 років тому +623

    I don’t know if this was just me, but I never assumed X-Ray vision actually involved X-Rays. The “everybody around you has cancer” problem seemed just too obvious for even comic book writers to ignore. I always assumed it was just shorthand for being able to see through solid objects, because the public would have been most familiar with that idea through their doctor’s X-Ray machines.

    • @Sheol02
      @Sheol02 6 років тому +60

      That's not just you. No person over the age of 5 that's ever read any fiction that involved a power called "X-Ray vision" thinks it actually uses X-Rays or that X-Rays work like that. Pretty much half of this video is pointless straw-man, and the rest explains how X-Rays vision might work, but doesn't explain why you don't want to have it.

    • @fannydelgadillo2974
      @fannydelgadillo2974 6 років тому +8

      @@Sheol02 Zzz..

    • @Arm_Chair_Engineers
      @Arm_Chair_Engineers 6 років тому +39

      Yeah the X-ray part has likely always just been a shorthand way of conveying the power, but since the ability is rarely ever explained it leaves itself open to interpretations like this. A literal interpretation yes, but also an interesting way to get into the mechanics of multiple forms of emissive radiation. IMO good content.

    • @ckallmes1
      @ckallmes1 6 років тому +9

      Same. The Flash and others like him are called "speedsters" because the underlying power they have is more complicated. X-ray vision just means you can see through stuff. But the that doesn't make for a good science video :-)

    • @becausescience
      @becausescience  6 років тому +53

      Haha yeah poor X-ray vision is getting straw-manned. Whatever will Superpowers do? -- KH

  • @theCodyReeder
    @theCodyReeder 6 років тому +459

    With my X-ray spectrometer I do have x-ray vision and it’s awesome!

    • @ethan_wav1593
      @ethan_wav1593 6 років тому +6

      You should do a video on it would be awesome to see what it looks like

    • @ezekielnewren3572
      @ezekielnewren3572 6 років тому +4

      I'd love to see an episode of you showing us what objects would look like with your X-ray spectrometer.

    • @lynspyre
      @lynspyre 6 років тому +8

      He has already done that, go to his channel

    • @ethan_wav1593
      @ethan_wav1593 6 років тому +3

      LynSpyre he’s briefly touched on it he should a full in depth episode

    • @Richard_Nickerson
      @Richard_Nickerson 6 років тому +1

      Assumes he hasn't recorded such awesomeness and needed to be told by random Internet people to do so...

  • @djordjezivic2481
    @djordjezivic2481 6 років тому +579

    meet the INTERNET MAN
    *has wi-fi vision*
    *knows everything on the web*
    *distracts vilans in fights with interesting facts*

    • @mikerice868
      @mikerice868 6 років тому +51

      If you had the entire collective knowledge of the internet I feel like social media would just kill you with the salt alone

    • @SupersuMC
      @SupersuMC 5 років тому +26

      Kills villains with dead memes

    • @riyandipratama6944
      @riyandipratama6944 5 років тому +11

      Shoot Rick Astley and Darude directly into their minds

    • @064rob
      @064rob 5 років тому +5

      That's Freakazoid

    • @I_like_big_bombs
      @I_like_big_bombs 5 років тому +6

      I can watch Because Science any time with my power being a Proxy Server. Fuck you CIA

  • @JoshuanKnode
    @JoshuanKnode 5 років тому +178

    Superman can cycle his vision through all spectrums, some of those allow him to see through things. X-ray in the context of "X-Ray vision" just means he can see through things, not that he's literally using x-rays.
    But he could totally see x-rays if he wanted to.

    • @T1Oracle
      @T1Oracle Рік тому +4

      He shoots lasers from his eyes. Also shooting x-rays from his eyes is hardly a leap from that.

    • @Notlordstark
      @Notlordstark Рік тому +2

      Yeah but some type of electromagnetic radiation still has to reflect off of (for example) bones in order for you to see them. There’s not nearly enough background radiation to get a useful image, so you absolutely would have to shoot radiation at objects you want to see through.

    • @Onewill818
      @Onewill818 Рік тому +3

      Superman can fly and had can thrive at the center of the sun.... Clearly he's not using normal physics. X-ray is a way of dumbing it down not literally shooting x-rays from his face

  • @andreaavina6446
    @andreaavina6446 6 років тому +769

    When being a god just doesn't work anymore.

  • @maxbuster1508
    @maxbuster1508 6 років тому +1485

    How to beat a WiFi superhero :
    Airplane mode...

  • @georgep5590
    @georgep5590 6 років тому +500

    Dude, why are you ruining every superpower for me. Now I can't think of superpowers without imagining the science behind it in real life.
    Wrote this before the video finished.

    • @Mike-oz7fx
      @Mike-oz7fx 6 років тому +6

      +GP Jr Some videos debunking them are bullshit to a certain extent.

    • @MrLaddy101
      @MrLaddy101 6 років тому +14

      Maybe that's because you are develop a a more accurate understanding of actual reality over fictional reality

    • @PastMourning
      @PastMourning 6 років тому +18

      You'd want flight. Nothing can go wrong with flight. So long as you don't fly too high without a source of oxygen.

    • @andrewlangendorfer9996
      @andrewlangendorfer9996 6 років тому +2

      GP Jr totaly agree

    • @CorvinTheSwasian
      @CorvinTheSwasian 6 років тому +12

      @@PastMourning or accelerate too fast... Or turn too quickly. That stuff might mess woth your brain/spine etc. Fly safe! (also you'd have to take air turbulences/winds or whatever into account , which you might not see and which could then knock you around uncontrollably. But that risk is probably decreased if, like you said, one doesn't fly too high)

  • @philipfahy9658
    @philipfahy9658 6 років тому +94

    The amount of radiation from medical X-Rays is actually quite low. The X-Ray techs leave the room simply because they have to perform the procedure a lot and the exposure can add up. So if you could emit X-Ray radiation from your eyes (and it was of the intensity of an X-Ray scan), the average person you come into contact with while super heroing would prolly be fine. But don't stare into your loved one's eyes, cause after a significant amount of time, you know cancer.

    • @peterjf7723
      @peterjf7723 6 років тому +14

      Medical x-rays are low power now but they used to be a lot higher power as the film was not so sensitive.
      I can remember there being X-Ray machines in shoe shops so people could see how well their children's feet fitted their shoes.

    • @banglaanimeproject9036
      @banglaanimeproject9036 Рік тому

      ​@@peterjf7723 oh wow

    • @peterjf7723
      @peterjf7723 Рік тому +2

      @@banglaanimeproject9036 That was in the late 1960s. I think the machines had been used from the 1920s. These were fluoroscopes, using a screen to form an image, there was no hard copy produced. There was probably not much radiation hazard to occasional customers, but shop staff working near the machine could be at greater risk.

    • @philipfahy9658
      @philipfahy9658 Рік тому

      @Chris Kortjohn This is misleading at best. We get cancer all throughout our lives, our body simple removes it. Sometimes you get a bad dice roll.

  • @GISP
    @GISP 6 років тому +315

    Is it just me or does Kyles neck-string-thing look like he risen from an autopsy?

    • @IAmKnightsDawn
      @IAmKnightsDawn 6 років тому +18

      It does look like a Y incision.

    • @Njuregen
      @Njuregen 6 років тому +10

      His secret power is animated corpse...

    • @randomwhittyname41
      @randomwhittyname41 6 років тому +4

      But what Necromancer arose him?

    • @Thememester439
      @Thememester439 6 років тому

      @@randomwhittyname41 that would be me.

    • @abhijay_
      @abhijay_ 6 років тому

      Random WhittyName Diablo

  • @musclehank6067
    @musclehank6067 6 років тому +629

    I mean I wouldn't mind banana vision...

    • @aaaaaaaa6685
      @aaaaaaaa6685 6 років тому +3

      Muscle Hank ayyyy

    • @ipostwater6491
      @ipostwater6491 6 років тому +2

      Muscle Hank ayyyy

    • @michaelantonius321
      @michaelantonius321 6 років тому +1

      Does Scishow release a new video today, oh my majesty?

    • @CarBENbased
      @CarBENbased 6 років тому +5

      You would know exactly how big something is just by looking at it. No need for a banana for scale when you have banana vision.

    • @user-ls4ob6xb5p
      @user-ls4ob6xb5p 6 років тому

      What??

  • @jinus5770
    @jinus5770 6 років тому +1064

    If I could switch it on and off I would call it cancer vision
    Bad guy: I’ve got you now.
    Me: cancer vision on.
    Bad guy: shoots me
    Dies of stage 4 cancer in a week

    • @cyberpunk964
      @cyberpunk964 6 років тому +49

      GOT YOU

    • @kaichew7232
      @kaichew7232 6 років тому +3

      Lol

    • @josiahfitzgerald3712
      @josiahfitzgerald3712 6 років тому +5

      Jacksonavitch Ofmg LMFAO!🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @_omaradnan
      @_omaradnan 6 років тому +7

      @@aspwned no it isn't why would it be

    • @_omaradnan
      @_omaradnan 6 років тому +3

      @@aspwned why should it not be people who have it don't mind why should you ?

  • @akireshu
    @akireshu 5 років тому +63

    His necklace makes it looks he had an autopsy done on him

    • @davelowets
      @davelowets 4 місяці тому

      😆 The "Y" incision

  • @clintsrandomchannel5301
    @clintsrandomchannel5301 6 років тому +353

    But can I get B O N E L E S S S H A D O W S

    • @user-nr6pz8ye2p
      @user-nr6pz8ye2p 6 років тому +1

      Clints Random Channel hmmmm ya

    • @vaincelent
      @vaincelent 6 років тому

      The fuck kind of shadow and C A L C I U M M A C H I N E 🅱️ROKE

    • @OhitsONnow
      @OhitsONnow 6 років тому

      Sure thing fam, right alongside your boneless watermelons

    • @DerpyNetworking
      @DerpyNetworking 6 років тому

      woke

  • @beckyfromhr588
    @beckyfromhr588 6 років тому +220

    Wi-Fi: Saving people's childhoods as well as being the best thing ever created

    • @j-sant-animations8105
      @j-sant-animations8105 6 років тому +4

      Actually it's the programmers behind all that the World Wide Web has to offer that you should be blessing. The radio signals of Wifi gives us access to it like two phones connecting two people in a conversation, other words: pointless without the people/programmers.

    • @WisdomCatto
      @WisdomCatto 6 років тому +3

      WiFi vision

    • @yokayomithepowerscaler1740
      @yokayomithepowerscaler1740 6 років тому +1

      Does anybody else find him just annoying and unfunny

    • @objectiveauto9326
      @objectiveauto9326 6 років тому +1

      wifi is somehow controlling and boil our selves ^_^... thats why some companies have only LAN

    • @randomwhittyname41
      @randomwhittyname41 6 років тому +1

      Also, WiFi: Cancer waves. Glad to be hard wired.

  • @shalompope
    @shalompope 6 років тому +190

    Have you tried turning it off an on again?

    • @rosemontave1
      @rosemontave1 6 років тому +2

      and*

    • @pizzas4breakfast
      @pizzas4breakfast 6 років тому +7

      My wife when the viagra won't work

    • @rosemontave1
      @rosemontave1 6 років тому +1

      @@pizzas4breakfast HEY!!! ED isn't a joke.

    • @Jiraton
      @Jiraton 6 років тому +1

      Man tears is a good viagra substitute for women, we should save them.

    • @JoahTheThread5ive
      @JoahTheThread5ive 6 років тому +1

      You are right about ED not being a joke.
      What Pizza 4breakfast typed was a joke about ED.
      See the difference?

  • @waffleman5800
    @waffleman5800 6 років тому +449

    U could see diamonds in minecraft

    • @keisuketakahashi4568
      @keisuketakahashi4568 6 років тому +1

      Kristupas B lmao xd

    • @EctoGamer
      @EctoGamer 6 років тому

      Ir ne tik deimantus ;)

    • @waffleman5800
      @waffleman5800 6 років тому

      @@EctoGamer jo ir redstona

    • @EctoGamer
      @EctoGamer 6 років тому

      @@waffleman5800 norejau parasyt grynai "ir redstona", bet kazkodel nerasiau...

    • @waffleman5800
      @waffleman5800 6 років тому

      @@EctoGamer galvojau kad norėjai parašyti kažką vulgaraus

  • @sevorisdoe2846
    @sevorisdoe2846 6 років тому +29

    Very nice video! Thanks for the shout-out, it was a blast contributing to this video!
    To share a few other footnotes: The threshold of detection is defined by the wavelength of the radio waves you are using. Modern studies give us 12cm on the side for 2.4 Ghzs, 4-5cm on the side for 5 Ghz (this depends on the precise processing method). Objects below this size, unless *highly* metallic, will not be detectable (and even those highly metallic objects, more by chance), and at 12cm respective 4-5cm they are only low-resolution blibs- a single "voxel" (think a 3D pixel - cube instead of square.)
    Still, even with those limits we are looking at through-vision sensing of room layouts, all major furniture and its positions, the position of any people and their rough posture (standing, huddling/crouching, laying on the ground, extremities pulled in or stretched out), and based off practical results you could sense something as small as a coffee cup in the table in the next room, with a 5Ghz WLAN nearby.
    What I also think needs highlighting about WifDar or WiFi vision is how secondary powerful it is. WifDar makes for a good spider sense (metallic masses on people moving in certain ways near you are very probable a weapon being drawn or brought to bear on you; you can sense people's movement near you (such as preparing to throw a punch or rush you); you can sense cars; and in a fight situation you enjoy a massive information superiority, which is *extremely* valuable) and either by physically placing a WiFi emitter or hacking a device, you can mark and track objects.
    And as a look forward to "upgrades". Right now there is potential talk about the commercial use of 60Ghz WiFi. This isn't usable *through* walls anymore, only over a few meters of air, but offers drastically improved bandwith and would likely find use in smart homes/smart enviroments, "spime" smart objects and the like. And with 60Ghz, you could image as fine as *5mm*.
    Many people have smartphones today. Many more will have them in the future. In every badguys pocket is a potential emitter source, maybe in the future with a 60Ghz antenna also.
    How's that for "X-Ray" vision? :D

  • @ryanrothrock7051
    @ryanrothrock7051 6 років тому +57

    Someone needs to write a comic series about a super hero called Bone Shadower. And his symbol needs to be the Wi-Fi symbol

  • @EwWhoIsTHAT
    @EwWhoIsTHAT 6 років тому +204

    Am I the only person disturbed by that red necklace thing Kyle is wearing? I couldn't be sure if it was a blood-colored necklaces or loosely connected stitches holding up a recently reanimated zombie Kyle.

    • @sfsmaus
      @sfsmaus 6 років тому +16

      That was the first thing I thought of when I started watching the video. "Has Kyle gone through an autopsy? What's going on with his chest? Oh it's a stringy necklace, good lord."

    • @LinebaKKer
      @LinebaKKer 6 років тому +3

      Def thought it was a scar at first

    • @amitkoranga5371
      @amitkoranga5371 6 років тому +2

      Well now jts bothering me too . Thank you

    • @PastMourning
      @PastMourning 6 років тому +3

      Same.. I thought he had had some gnarly chest surgery.

    • @brentvettel5343
      @brentvettel5343 6 років тому +1

      Interesting

  • @michaelharder9737
    @michaelharder9737 6 років тому +27

    With radio vision, you could have your superhero differentiate wavelengths the same way we differentiate colour. You could also have them able to focus on a certain wavelength if they wanted, like how we focus our eyes, to filter out interference. It would be awesome.

  • @SeaDog
    @SeaDog 6 років тому +489

    Ok Thor, like having a hammer is any better.

  • @lemonlordminecraft
    @lemonlordminecraft 6 років тому +76

    3:52
    You kept me waiting way too long for this joke.

  • @Uhlbelk
    @Uhlbelk 6 років тому +44

    Best part about WiFi vision....knowing where you will get good internet connection.

  • @dimitisphot6118
    @dimitisphot6118 5 років тому +160

    You said I could see through clothes. I WANT IT, don't care about anything else

    • @ryatt9365
      @ryatt9365 5 років тому +34

      ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

    • @4horsemenofthemultiverse
      @4horsemenofthemultiverse 5 років тому +13

      You and me both, you and me both brother

    • @Reisboy_PhD
      @Reisboy_PhD 5 років тому +9

      you could, but you could not see with a good enough definition to be really called "see through clothes"

    • @kreamy_karym
      @kreamy_karym 4 роки тому +1

      @@Reisboy_PhD Listen closely at 10:30 to 11:05 . It is possible.

    • @iamyourfather6629
      @iamyourfather6629 4 роки тому +3

      Actually you can see through clothes but it would be useless cause all you will be seeing is X ray ( skeleton) not body

  • @bluemarauder6997
    @bluemarauder6997 6 років тому +108

    that necklace you wear makes it look like you had an autopsy done. lol

    • @Wavemaninawe
      @Wavemaninawe 6 років тому +1

      Kyle got frustrated as he disproved superhero X-ray vision and he still wanted to see inside stuff.

    • @aneesh2115
      @aneesh2115 6 років тому

      With a pizza cutter

    • @abrockman23
      @abrockman23 6 років тому

      Exactly what I thought haha

    • @Wavemaninawe
      @Wavemaninawe 6 років тому

      He may also have done it as a statement regarding Healing Factors.

  • @aqui1ifer
    @aqui1ifer 6 років тому +30

    Honestly it seems better that instead of pigeon-holed powers; you’d want broad, voluntary powers like super-perception, or the ability to change you rod and cone cells to perceive additional light wavelengths. Some stories I’ve read, people removed their lens which allowed them to see in UV. Imagine being able to switch to Infared reception to win every hide-and-seek game ever.

    • @AXharoth
      @AXharoth 6 років тому +2

      remote viewing

    • @NETkoholik
      @NETkoholik 6 років тому +3

      I'd hide in the fridge if I knew you had infrared vision. Unfortunately I might not end up well but hey, that's a problem for my future self!

  • @SubscribersWithNoVideos-mh3ic
    @SubscribersWithNoVideos-mh3ic 6 років тому +59

    *X-Ray Vision... **_Ionize your foes into giant cancer cells..._*

    • @ee93
      @ee93 6 років тому +16

      Now that’s ALOT OF DAMAGE

    • @andmicbro1
      @andmicbro1 6 років тому +2

      Haha you evil doers! You might have won this time, but in approximately 10-20 years you have a chance of developing cancer, so enjoy your ill gotten gains while you can!

  • @GoatMan-dl5ds
    @GoatMan-dl5ds 6 років тому +31

    I think the ability to change your type of vision would be cool like infra red, radar, wifi, ultraviolet etc

    • @TheSMR1969
      @TheSMR1969 Рік тому

      Radar aren't lights, I think

    • @GoatMan-dl5ds
      @GoatMan-dl5ds Рік тому +1

      @@TheSMR1969 correct its an electromagnetic wave that uses the frequencies that bounce off of whatever it hits to locate objects.

    • @GoatMan-dl5ds
      @GoatMan-dl5ds Рік тому +2

      @puteqx that would be sonar

  • @tomatoanus
    @tomatoanus 6 років тому +175

    dont tell me what i want. ill take the xray vision just on principle now.

    • @shotgun6X
      @shotgun6X 6 років тому +4

      Oooh boy. You're in for a terrible life, bro.

    • @AXharoth
      @AXharoth 6 років тому +2

      oh look we have a badass overhere

    • @ClarkKulper
      @ClarkKulper 6 років тому

      I agree with Tomato Anus.

    • @fearless4him595
      @fearless4him595 6 років тому

      Purposefully giving someone cancer because you hate them is something a villain would do. A hero would stop you.

    • @midas2092
      @midas2092 6 років тому

      @@Tulik2 very wise, and terminology can be unwieldy.

  • @aarond.rodriguez2594
    @aarond.rodriguez2594 6 років тому +57

    0:13 Technically no, you did not get us, your hand was not below your waist.

  • @ValentineBrotha
    @ValentineBrotha 5 років тому +129

    "If you were emitting X-ray vision you would cause damage to everyone around you!"
    Me: "And that's a con how exactly?"

    • @shadowdestroyer93yt48
      @shadowdestroyer93yt48 4 роки тому +12

      because your increasing the chance of people near you to have cancer

    • @thraxironhide1674
      @thraxironhide1674 4 роки тому +28

      @@shadowdestroyer93yt48 but then you can call it cancer vision.

    • @shadowdestroyer93yt48
      @shadowdestroyer93yt48 4 роки тому +2

      @@wyatt3m7 this was 2 months ago I did not know I posted this but ok your kinda late but have a good day

    • @HassanAhmed-rf9xr
      @HassanAhmed-rf9xr 2 роки тому +1

      @@thraxironhide1674 yes but it's still X ray vision but with an added bonus.

    • @stm7810
      @stm7810 2 роки тому

      you can't have pets, friends, family etc. and anything you own would have to be replaced on the regular, so as to not give yourself cancer, and all your food would at best be bland as the radiation breaks down some of the molecules in it.

  • @lizandraclayres
    @lizandraclayres 6 років тому +55

    as a radiology technician im happy i can understand at least one of your videos

    • @youtubeshadowbannedme
      @youtubeshadowbannedme 5 років тому

      You are pretty

    • @athishmartins694
      @athishmartins694 5 років тому

      wow

    • @orbracha25
      @orbracha25 4 роки тому +1

      two things:
      1. wait, radiology technician, that's a thing?!
      2. how do i become a radiology technician?

    • @lizandraclayres
      @lizandraclayres 4 роки тому

      minecraft or I work at the hospital’s radiology department, I do x-rays, CT, MRI, mammography, etc... You can get a degree in a technical school. You can also work with industrial radiology, x-raying materials and building walls.

    • @jacobjohnson2603
      @jacobjohnson2603 Рік тому

      technologist not technician

  • @christiansebastianobaudo9558
    @christiansebastianobaudo9558 6 років тому +16

    6:45
    Kyle, actually...
    Alex Hills, author of Wi-Fi and the Bad Boys of Radio says:
    "Way back in 1999 the fledgling wireless industry needed a marketing name for the new products that conformed to the technical specifications called 'IEEE 802.11'. 'IEEE 802.11' didn't have much of a ring to it, and the industry association wanted a catchy name. They came up with wi-fi, and that's what's been used ever since.
    It didn’t hurt that the name rhymes with 'hi-fi,' which was short for 'high fidelity,' a term that, back in the day, referred to high-quality sound systems. Some people even say that wi-fi therefore stands for 'wireless fidelity,' but those who were involved in the industry association's process of selecting a name say it's not really true. They say that the name was always just wi-fi."

  • @coleentruax8670
    @coleentruax8670 6 років тому +87

    Never fear it's Wi-Fi Vision man!

    • @iranoutofnames6444
      @iranoutofnames6444 6 років тому +8

      it's WI-F-eyes!

    • @WisdomCatto
      @WisdomCatto 6 років тому +4

      With the power of WiFi and the internet!!!!!

    • @minecci258
      @minecci258 6 років тому +1

      I'm so sorry, we don't have Wi-fi here. You'll have to use the cable

    • @marca6597
      @marca6597 6 років тому +1

      Waifus

    • @carmenchin8011
      @carmenchin8011 6 років тому

      airplane mode

  • @garandsho723
    @garandsho723 5 років тому +36

    8:21
    Well now I'm uncomfortable

  • @killianbach4288
    @killianbach4288 6 років тому +68

    I love your in-depth scientific explanations, and your comedy has been improving! Keep it up!

  • @icarus1387
    @icarus1387 6 років тому +68

    Why you don't want "Wi-Fi vision"
    -you can't really sleep because you can see through your eyelid.
    -your vision would be weird because in theory you can see behind you.
    -your superpower would easily blocked by aluminium foil.
    -you will see alot of new colour.
    -your superpower is useless in rural area where there is no Wi-Fi.
    -you can't use your superpower in the day because Wi-Fi is fairly weak.
    -radar would look like giant laser.
    -radio tower would look like a spot light.
    -and alot more..

    • @justs_
      @justs_ 6 років тому +20

      I’m pretty sure if you would want to have wifi vision, you would also want to have the ability to, idk, *switch it off* ?

    • @hellras
      @hellras 6 років тому +2

      Yeah, right. It's like X-Ray vision, you don't use it all the time.

    • @Dr_Mundo
      @Dr_Mundo 6 років тому

      Idk how its called in english but in google translate it says its called mobile data,wich gives you Internet

    • @limiv5272
      @limiv5272 6 років тому +5

      In addition to being able to turn your wi-fi vision off, you would also want to be able to emit wi-fi or the cm length waves mentioned in the video, just like some interpretations of x-ray vision that include being able to emit the x-rays. The would solve the whole rural areas problem

    • @taytheprodigy4388
      @taytheprodigy4388 6 років тому

      Limi V portable hotspot maybe?

  • @erbgorre
    @erbgorre 6 років тому +61

    0:18 why does that stick of dynamite say "conditioner"?
    also, nice use of the muskwatch theme for bone shadower

    • @sciencecoolnerds8524
      @sciencecoolnerds8524 6 років тому +4

      erbgorre maybe it's a belonging of Thor because he's uses ThorAel

    • @universall8731
      @universall8731 6 років тому +5

      Its a conditioner bottle in the Safe, Not dynamite, wtf.

    • @secretagentmanua
      @secretagentmanua 6 років тому +5

      People always ask about his luscious locks. Why wouldn't he keep the source locked up to keep people away?

    • @whitherwhence
      @whitherwhence 6 років тому +8

      Because Kyle's hair is dyn-o-mite

    • @RaphaelLamour
      @RaphaelLamour 6 років тому

      Love that hair.

  • @mmcmullen8543
    @mmcmullen8543 6 років тому +27

    Discount Thor is my favorite UA-cam "celebrity"

  • @ianvonderharr6426
    @ianvonderharr6426 6 років тому +317

    you look like thor...

    • @yami-9436
      @yami-9436 6 років тому +14

      exactly

    • @nara242
      @nara242 6 років тому +31

      He is thor.

    • @stiroki
      @stiroki 6 років тому +6

      Like Thor he whould look better with short hair.

    • @cyberpunk964
      @cyberpunk964 6 років тому +1

      Onmmg he does

    • @cyberpunk964
      @cyberpunk964 6 років тому +5

      Exept smarter

  • @chaausxentrus2777
    @chaausxentrus2777 5 років тому +15

    MCU Spiderman's enhanced reconnaissance mode is a perfect example of wifi vision in application!

  • @torbgen
    @torbgen 6 років тому +54

    (wi-fi isn't short for wireless fidelity)
    Wi-Fi being shorthand for Wireless Fidelity is a common misconception, in reality it's just a nickname because it's a lot easier to say/remember that than "IEEE 802.11x"

    • @buckysrevenge
      @buckysrevenge 6 років тому +6

      boingboing.net/2005/11/08/wifi-isnt-short-for.html

    • @Anthonybrother
      @Anthonybrother 6 років тому

      42

    • @merceralex1935
      @merceralex1935 6 років тому

      You deserve a lot of likes

    • @freegaming9820
      @freegaming9820 6 років тому

      Wireless fidelity is not even a technology. WiFi is a company.

    • @klausillo
      @klausillo 6 років тому

      Wi-Fi is short for Wireless Fidelity.
      Wireless Fidelity is the nickname for IEEE 802 11x.

  • @pattykrabbies
    @pattykrabbies 6 років тому +8

    “Also gotchu”
    *M o t h e r f u c k e r*

  • @theend4098
    @theend4098 6 років тому +33

    didn’t know thor was a teacher

  • @Sam-fq3bt
    @Sam-fq3bt 6 років тому +45

    Please do an episode on Doctor Who's sonic screwdriver

    • @Zettern96
      @Zettern96 6 років тому +2

      I think he already talked about it, but I can't remember where.

    • @davethewave2197
      @davethewave2197 6 років тому +1

      It is possible because sound waves can move things

    • @DefMunkyYT
      @DefMunkyYT 6 років тому +1

      ua-cam.com/video/lIXlPZHtdbU/v-deo.html

    • @Sam-fq3bt
      @Sam-fq3bt 6 років тому

      Thanks!

  • @SciencewithSteph
    @SciencewithSteph 6 років тому +8

    Having vision from the microwave level all the way up to infrared have some interesting powers:
    If you could see in the high frequency end of wifi range, much of that would be absorbed by water (which how microwaves work)... this would mean we would see dark patches of people's blood and muscle rather than bone shadowing. As a super power this could lead to some really cool powers like being able to see how much a supervillain is "plotting" becuase of blood moving towards the brain or a heightened "spidersense" by being able to see muscles starting to tense before someone actually moves. Maybe I don't want X-ray vision but I DEFINITELY want microwave vision!

  • @nicholasadams2374
    @nicholasadams2374 2 роки тому +31

    Another great "Why You Don't Want" video!! Though, I think you got a little hung up on the "x-ray" part. It's just what they called that type of superhero vision at the time. Not because it used x-rays, but because it was the only thing that was analogous. Plus it sounded better than see-through vision. LMAO

    • @VelvetVexations
      @VelvetVexations Рік тому +3

      Actually, while I do think the video is pedantic because no one actually thinks of them as x-rays nowadays, "at the time" when Superman's x-ray vision was first established they were one hundred percent canonically x-rays. While the writers misunderstood how x-ray devices capture images, they would occasionally times assign it other properties based on how x-rays work. That's why he can't see through lead.

  • @ohyeahyeah4323
    @ohyeahyeah4323 6 років тому +39

    What if x-ray vision doesn't actually use x-ray's?

    • @ohyeahyeah4323
      @ohyeahyeah4323 6 років тому +5

      I watched the rest of the video....

    • @nenrain
      @nenrain 6 років тому

      You remined me to watch Maxmillian mus

    • @mm-vv2de
      @mm-vv2de 6 років тому

      what the hell is this comment section

  • @Sqtgdog
    @Sqtgdog 6 років тому +35

    X-ray vision is what I like to call associative terminology. While specifically incorrect, it is used to invoke an idea and/or understanding of a concept, for which the proper scientific terms are unknown (due to lack of understanding of the underlying mechanics) or not understood by general public. Great job over thinking this one tho!

    • @SoxyKrawl
      @SoxyKrawl 6 років тому +2

      Y'all are just being salty af, tbh. This is literally the entire purpose of Kyle's show. Overthinking EVERYTHING about pop culture. That's why you people are here, is it not?

    • @Sqtgdog
      @Sqtgdog 6 років тому +4

      You seem like the salty one to me. My comment was in no part criticism. I watched and commented BECAUSE I do enjoy the thought experiment.

    • @becausescience
      @becausescience  6 років тому +7

      Everyone calm down. It's fine. I had no idea many people didn't think x-rays were involved in x-ray vision -- KH

    • @jonathangould189
      @jonathangould189 6 років тому

      That is by far the best explanation of that concept I have ever heard. Well done Daniel.

  • @DeusBeelzebubGod
    @DeusBeelzebubGod 6 років тому +6

    When saying"x-ray vision", I think that people don't necessarily mean shooting and receiving x-rays. It seems to be more of *visually block/ignore the light from certain objects and use environmental queues to image objects behind what is, currently, in front of you.

  • @eduardomendes1799
    @eduardomendes1799 5 років тому +33

    I really love this show! Thanks Kyle for delivering science knowledge in such way we get in "ressonance" with it.

  • @HORRIOR1
    @HORRIOR1 6 років тому +88

    Would Wi-fi vision allow you to see who is stealing your Wi-fi?

    • @moisesmartinezmorales5885
      @moisesmartinezmorales5885 6 років тому

      Hmmmmmm interesting

    • @Someguy12333
      @Someguy12333 6 років тому

      Lol

    • @sevorisdoe2846
      @sevorisdoe2846 6 років тому +6

      Define "stealing your WiFi".
      Physically, obviously. Otherwise... a.) maybe but b.) why is your WiFi not encrypted and password-protected?

    • @Rodrigokdo
      @Rodrigokdo 6 років тому +1

      with programming and network knowledge you can figure it out.

    • @JoshuaHillerup
      @JoshuaHillerup 6 років тому +4

      Yes. Just looking for sources that are the same "colour" that your wifi router is currently. Although that becomes difficult if there are so many wifi sources in your area that you are getting collisions.

  • @Dragonrage1oo1
    @Dragonrage1oo1 6 років тому +20

    Wi-Fi vison sounds like the adds that promote themselves and say "The best washer in the world. It'll make your dishes sparkling clean. I's only $200000.99" or something like that.

  • @joshusky581
    @joshusky581 6 років тому +52

    Wait so when I go through an airport scanner thingy they can see my pee pee?

    • @gamerguy9729
      @gamerguy9729 6 років тому +37

      Joshusky yes and they know how short it is too

    • @joshfahey3360
      @joshfahey3360 6 років тому +13

      gamer guy damn it's a tough life :(

    • @peterjf7723
      @peterjf7723 6 років тому +3

      I think it is only the machines that they use if they take you to another room for a security scan that can see in such detail.

    • @ursosexmachina
      @ursosexmachina 5 років тому +3

      @@gamerguy9729 They can see mine rolled up in a 10 ft coil.

    • @maxlumley3772
      @maxlumley3772 5 років тому +1

      Yes if it was big enough to see

  • @demonguysayshi2666
    @demonguysayshi2666 5 років тому +23

    Can I borrow that metal riff
    But Cmon man...
    Can we just agree that that was a disappointing metal scream

  • @aarond.rodriguez2594
    @aarond.rodriguez2594 6 років тому +13

    The world wouldn't go dark if your visible spectrum of light increased to include x-rays, because you would still the the normal visible light spectrum, it would only add to your normal sight.

  • @michaelkukula5926
    @michaelkukula5926 6 років тому +21

    QUESTION: What would happen if the Death Star or Star Killer Base fired at a neutron star?

    • @freyadraginda-burnett9781
      @freyadraginda-burnett9781 5 років тому +2

      Bad things. Very bad things would happen

    • @farkbett699
      @farkbett699 5 років тому

      @@freyadraginda-burnett9781 very bad

    • @infinitypilot
      @infinitypilot 5 років тому +2

      Even though the energy required to blow planets up IS pretty big, I don't think it'd be enough to affect a far more massive, dense, and energetic object like a neutron star. Don't forget that they're literally Black Holes Lite. It would be like launching all of the Earth's fissile materials and nukes at the sun. Hardly a drop in the churning sea.

  • @barrybend7189
    @barrybend7189 6 років тому +22

    Hey Kyle please explain the GN Drives from Gundam 00. Requires quantum physics.

  • @ryatt9365
    @ryatt9365 5 років тому +7

    2:44 Who says I'd be a hero? I just want x ray vision.

  • @fiendbear4417
    @fiendbear4417 6 років тому +47

    “X-ray vision is EYE-onizing radiation.”

  • @Xcreed_22
    @Xcreed_22 6 років тому +27

    3:46 exactly what we have asked for.

  • @kevinvansickle9393
    @kevinvansickle9393 6 років тому +7

    Holy crap. I am currently studying radiography, and while sitting in class the same day you released this, I thought about x-ray vision and how it would affect those around us, and having you make a video about it. This is awesome!

    • @franciscocota6440
      @franciscocota6440 Рік тому +2

      It's a sign from god. That god is Thor. Science Thor.

    • @kevinvansickle9393
      @kevinvansickle9393 Рік тому

      ​@Francisco Cota 4 years later, and I still reference this video everytime I teach people how xray images are made. 'It's not the bone we see as much as its the SHADOW of the bone we see.'

  • @zhongxina1227
    @zhongxina1227 6 років тому +8

    what about clairvoyance
    you would be able to send your sight anywhere so it better than xray vision

  • @PaleGhost69
    @PaleGhost69 6 років тому +15

    Wouldn't the X Rays affect your whole body as they radiate from your eyes. You'd have to wear a lead suit whenever you use the power. Kinda like Iron Man but heavier.

    • @dweller132
      @dweller132 6 років тому +2

      Like Black Sabbath's version of Iron Man.

    • @astheravensfly8614
      @astheravensfly8614 6 років тому

      Not to mention if you were able to be your own detector, they would be coming back into your eyes.

    • @tiagotiagot
      @tiagotiagot 6 років тому

      If you can see anything besides a flash, then your eyeballs must be able to block x-rays everywhere except for the pupil; because if your eyeballs didn't block it, light bouncing from all directions could hit the x-ray sensing cells in the back of your eye with almost exactly the same odds, it would not form a picture.
      Well, unless the x-rays you emit are mostly aligned like a laser, emitted in pulses, your eyeballs twitch to scan your field of view, and your retina can detect the time of flight of the photons (how long it took from emission to detection); in that case, it might be possible for your brain to reconstruct the image from the timing of the series of pulses and your eyeball twitch patterns.

  • @BassmanProducciones
    @BassmanProducciones 6 років тому +18

    To everyone saying that x-ray vision is just the name, here's a quote from Justice League (the animated series) "Pa Kent: We used to wrap his presents in lead foil so he couldn't peek."

    • @cloudstrife7510
      @cloudstrife7510 6 років тому +5

      Lo de Lea Justice league the animated series (and all the other TV shows as well) are not Canon with the comic books. Also lead can block more than just x-rays.

    • @Fazzel
      @Fazzel 6 років тому +6

      Robert is right. Lead can also block visible light.

    • @cloudstrife7510
      @cloudstrife7510 6 років тому

      Osiris Rex and gamma rays

    • @Fazzel
      @Fazzel 6 років тому +3

      I think lead blocks pretty much everything. Even radio waves. So even if the Kryptonians have Wi-Fi vision instead, I think lead would still block it. Actually just about any metal would block Wi-Fi. I worked at a place that had a room lined with copper mesh for testing radio equipment. It wouldn't let radio waves in or out. With the door shut even a cell phone wouldn't work in it.

    • @knightslayer9621
      @knightslayer9621 6 років тому

      Lo de Lea where would u get let foil? Generally I'm really curious where they got it, cause I'm looking to get some too lol

  • @ToabyToastbrot
    @ToabyToastbrot 6 років тому +28

    On the other hand, having strong X-Rays shooting out of your eyes would be a cool superpower for a villain. Giving everybody around cancer without them seeing you do anything *muhahah*!

    • @Acepunydefoc
      @Acepunydefoc 6 років тому +3

      Usually villains seek for some kind of profit. Unless you're one of the few villains that are so just because they want or you own a pharmaceutical/are an oncologist in USA/something else to benefit from ppl getting cancer, you wouldn't want it.

    • @ToabyToastbrot
      @ToabyToastbrot 6 років тому +5

      Well "supervillains" often do evil just because. But sure, why not have a pharmaceutical/clinical branch. Then you could even give more people X-ray-eyes to spread the plague!
      And for a costume I'll wear a lead-suit - to be the last one standing.

    • @gustavselin1197
      @gustavselin1197 6 років тому +1

      However, because of you always wearing a lead suit you would get other kinds of affections causing an untimely death as well.

    • @ToabyToastbrot
      @ToabyToastbrot 6 років тому +1

      No villains plan should be perfect guys, stop helping me with my plan! :D

    • @tiagotiagot
      @tiagotiagot 6 років тому +1

      Fear the Cancerman!

  • @shanestrickland5006
    @shanestrickland5006 5 років тому +18

    Wi-Fi vision is good for hacking.
    Wi-Fi vision is also good for malware i just lost my underwear.

  • @ninjahombrepalito1721
    @ninjahombrepalito1721 6 років тому +53

    Mr. Hill (since you don't like me using your full name), that was, well, different from what I expected. Pretty good, though. You could also see with sonic waves. Different frequencies can go through different things. And bounce back at you.
    .
    This makes me wonder though, about Superman's heat vision. Maybe he can just produce different wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation, which would not only give him both X-ray vision and heat vision, but all the way from microwaves and radiowaves up to gamma radiation. Scary. At least now with Man of Steel, he seems to shoot plasma out of his eyes.

    • @argr4sh
      @argr4sh 6 років тому +3

      The most awesome consequence of this power would be that he could, granted he could do this in complex patterns. Make an object INVISIBLE from a certain angle. Thanks to the fact that light acts like a wave, and he could let waves interfere with each other In such a way that not only he (if he emits such waves) but everyone behind him as well could look through the same stuff.

    • @ninjahombrepalito1721
      @ninjahombrepalito1721 6 років тому +1

      Kees Wuister that sounds good, but light does not interfere with each other.

    • @madestmadhatter
      @madestmadhatter 6 років тому +9

      Yes Kyle Hill doesn't like you using his full name, that's because it's weird when people use your full name, and is generally used when you are in trouble, I'd suggest calling him by his given name, Thor.

    • @argr4sh
      @argr4sh 6 років тому +1

      it actually does. look up monochromatic lazer on solid object. It looks super weird cause the interference causes some parts to cancel eachother out and other parts to amplify eachother.
      edit: sadly UA-cam does not have a proper video showing it. but I am really sure of it working this way, since a group at my university is using this concept to create a new way of detecting died of parts of the body.

    • @planexshifter
      @planexshifter 6 років тому +1

      Tweaking his nipples adjusts the wave-length?

  • @Avee_Itself
    @Avee_Itself 6 років тому +64

    what we want is xray visions that only go through clothes

  • @private6391
    @private6391 6 років тому +73

    Why don't this guy have 1 million subscribers

    • @GGMCUKAGAIN
      @GGMCUKAGAIN 6 років тому +24

      Because science?

    • @hannibustoogfyrre6074
      @hannibustoogfyrre6074 6 років тому +6

      If you wanna see an obscenely under-subbed UA-camr, look up Captain Disillusion!
      He's been posting for 10 years, extremely high quality content, and once even did a video where he had Beakman on as a guest!
      Still has less than 1 million subs.

    • @SirRobertSpriggs
      @SirRobertSpriggs 6 років тому +5

      He's part of Nerdist and they have 2.5 Million subs.

    • @sanjeethmahendrakar
      @sanjeethmahendrakar 6 років тому

      He will get there eventually.

    • @AXharoth
      @AXharoth 6 років тому

      give it time

  • @mafuyuhoshimiya8219
    @mafuyuhoshimiya8219 2 роки тому +6

    Now, I wonder, what about being able to see every wavelength? Like, from 10^(-30)m to thousands of meters of light?

  • @ravnjokr
    @ravnjokr 6 років тому +16

    you need a bone shadower metal tshirt. radiologists will buy it. definitely. lol

  • @TheBechtloff
    @TheBechtloff 6 років тому +6

    I always figured that's how Superman's x-ray vision worked, that he could just shift his vision up and down the electromagnetic field. I think "x-ray vision" is just a term because we just generally think of seeing through things as that.

  • @DanPx8
    @DanPx8 6 років тому +25

    Maybe x-ray vision is the wrong name for the power and what it really is is a "radiation vision", in which the hero sees almost every wavelengths, or at least enough to mount an image.

    • @TheBigDanois
      @TheBigDanois 6 років тому +2

      That's exactly what I was thinking. You have mind reading powers!!

    • @DisKorruptd
      @DisKorruptd 6 років тому +1

      not even Rad-Vis, Superman has super-sight, he can probably focus his eyes to look at the thing he wants to see by simply focusing on more distant particles, think like when look for a person in a crowd, there's a lot of moving people (representing the molecules) and through use of focusing, he's able to look past the people in the front to see the people he wants to see

    • @rafaelbrisolara7599
      @rafaelbrisolara7599 6 років тому

      I think if someone had a spectrum of sight that large he or she would be ofuscated from any light, unless he or she could have a sight sensibility complex enough to detect and separate a spectrum from the other that might overlap each other when arrive into his or her eyes.

  • @jimhalpert6968
    @jimhalpert6968 5 років тому +2

    Or a superpower called “radiation-vision” in which you can change what kind of radiation you can detect going all the way from gamma radiation and radio waves. You could be able to detect dangerous radioactive deposits and save people from unknown radiation poisoning, and also use your infrared and wifi vision to detect others and things around you as stated in the video.

  • @emv...
    @emv... 6 років тому +18

    I, as a creep, would be very happy with emitting weak x-rays out of my eyes🕵🏽‍♂️

    • @David-jn1gg
      @David-jn1gg 6 років тому

      I see you're a man of culture as well

  • @shleed
    @shleed 5 років тому +3

    Microwave ovens work around the cm range I think, and they might work for seeing through some things, as long as those things went metal or large amounts of water. If superman could also produce them in large amounts (either as a flashlight sort of thing or as an extension of his laser eyes, or both), he could use a less visible version of laser eyes (microwave eyes) to cook burritos and prevent them from getting cold while he eats them. Of course this would have many more uses, but I like the burrito thing.

    • @kaufmanat1
      @kaufmanat1 Рік тому

      There's a comic book idea. Nuke man. He doesn't actually "nuke" anything, but he emits microwaves, but instead of boiling people from a mile away, he just ends up operating a taco truck that microwaves all the food really fast, until some mutant recruiter finds him and adds him to a team of super soldiers...

  • @dmkfwolf2669
    @dmkfwolf2669 5 років тому +41

    I have Wi-Fi Vision and with it i tried to save a little boy from being kidnapped but i couldn't, you know why?
    because i had 1 bar and i was lagging too much.

    • @Reisboy_PhD
      @Reisboy_PhD 5 років тому +1

      that would only make the image darker....

    • @MrPAULONEAL
      @MrPAULONEAL 4 роки тому

      I have bluetooth vision...

  • @Knutschkuller24
    @Knutschkuller24 Рік тому +3

    So what if you could Emitt and call back your own rays that can go through walls and are harmless and then "tell" you what they hit

  • @asadstrangelittleman9655
    @asadstrangelittleman9655 6 років тому +21

    That thumbnail is cursed.

    • @Ye-Hu
      @Ye-Hu 6 років тому +2

      *SPOOKY*

    • @thekosterz
      @thekosterz 6 років тому

      But does it come with sprinkles?

    • @Cambalam178
      @Cambalam178 6 років тому +1

      A sad, strange little man a

  • @tentaile5458
    @tentaile5458 6 років тому +27

    Hmm, actually WI-FI does not stand for wireless fidelity. It is a common misconception. You can Google that if you want. There was this man called Phil Belanger he was the member of the group thats purpose was to name this thing that we now know as Wi-Fi. And so he said in an interview that Wi-Fi "can mean anything you want it to mean".

    • @patriotwhitewash7985
      @patriotwhitewash7985 6 років тому +3

      TentailE Wow, never knew that. Apparently it’s a trademark, and its etymology reminds me of how people thought Spam must mean “spiced ham”, etc.

    • @mangenkiou
      @mangenkiou 6 років тому +20

      And what if I want it to mean "Wireless Fidelity"?

    • @patriotwhitewash7985
      @patriotwhitewash7985 6 років тому +1

      mangenkiou Got em!

    • @crushproblems1774
      @crushproblems1774 6 років тому

      Even if I want WI-FI to mean fopdoodle?

  • @PrimalEdge
    @PrimalEdge 6 років тому +12

    what if x-ray vision is less like what we see in the medical community and more like a higher perception of vision? like the ability to detect neutrinos emitted from the sun? so for example, as the neutrinos pass through us, those with "higher perception" could detect the bone shadowing similar to an x-ray machine. this would allow the "rays" to be sourced behind the subject (rather than us having to emmit the x-rays) mand your eyes could receive the bone shadow signal. GOD I love your show!

    • @jannegrey
      @jannegrey 6 років тому

      Rather doubt the neutrinos. Lead glasses would help blocking them only if they were about 4 light years thick :) Muons are much more possible, though they still travel couple of kilometers into the ground, but maybe if we found right material we would be able to make a decent detector that could be used as glasses. The problem is to isolate such radiation from even more abundant light.

    • @TheTokuin
      @TheTokuin 6 років тому

      Jan Negrey nobody was talking about making glasses, its a super power

    • @jannegrey
      @jannegrey 6 років тому

      +TheTokuin I know, but often Clark Kent, and Kara Danvers, wear lead glasses to help them not to see skeletons of other people at all times. So it is a tangentially relevant topic. OP has proposed that perhaps neutrinos could be the source of "perception", and i pointed out that even if that was possible, it would create far more problems that it would solve.

    • @TerryProthero
      @TerryProthero 6 років тому

      There might be other forms of radiation that would work, as Kyle pointed out, but definitely not neutrinos. They can pass through our entire planet without being stopped by anything. Detecting them would be pretty useless because nothing can stop them to create a shadowing effect. You want a form of radiation that will pass through some substances and not others.

    • @TheTokuin
      @TheTokuin 6 років тому +1

      Jan Negrey i think what the op was going for wasnt neutrinos being the source of the power but the eyes working like a muscle and being able to detect things such as neutrinos by focusing. This would be more in line with the comic book idea as well. So the power would be that your eyes can see all light wavelengths and you could flex your eye muscles to narrow the range more towards xray or infrared or whichever. This means the power would always be working and the user would need to focus to stop seing those exotic wavelengths or wear special glasses

  • @michaelmoore7568
    @michaelmoore7568 7 місяців тому +1

    This channel is actually really good for envious people.

  • @SeantheBawse
    @SeantheBawse 6 років тому +6

    I always thought that "X-ray" vision actually had nothing to do with x-rays. I thought that when Spooper Man sees through things it was some comic book reason not actual x-rays, but the association with x-ray machines coined the name.

    • @daviddavis8965
      @daviddavis8965 6 років тому

      Sure but then why does lead block his vision like it would x-rays

    • @brokenwave6125
      @brokenwave6125 6 років тому

      @@daviddavis8965 All material blocks x rays if its thick enough, not just lead, but Superman's vision isn't effected by it at all like x ray vision would be.
      He can see through whole mountains and shit.

    • @daviddavis8965
      @daviddavis8965 6 років тому

      no he cant see through lead its canon look it up

    • @brokenwave6125
      @brokenwave6125 6 років тому

      @@daviddavis8965 I didn't say he could see through lead....
      I said he can see way deeper into other materials, including steel or rock, than xrays can.
      Not only lead blocks xrays...everything does to some degree...like bones for example...
      But his vision doesnt work like that at all.
      He can see right through large buildings, mountains, etc...
      Clearly and in color too.
      His vision really has very little in common with fluoroscopy.

  • @aarond.rodriguez2594
    @aarond.rodriguez2594 6 років тому +4

    2:54 Can you really not leave the void? How big can it scientifically be? Can it be Infinite? Would you not fall down, inless, it is only infinite in 2 axises.

  • @_captain_N
    @_captain_N 6 років тому +63

    maybe not x-ray vision, but what about x-ray glasses? 👓 at least those you can take off at any time.

    • @christian-qm3uf
      @christian-qm3uf 6 років тому +1

      captain N but what if you break the x ray glasses? (゜o゜)

    • @_captain_N
      @_captain_N 6 років тому +2

      then you would have to get new ones or try to find a way to fix them, depending on how you broke them.

    • @christian-qm3uf
      @christian-qm3uf 6 років тому

      captain N. true

    • @yuhyuh7603
      @yuhyuh7603 6 років тому +2

      still need to out run them to be able to see the shadow but you'd probably get cancer too since it's not a magical "mutation" you have.

    • @xdreef1216
      @xdreef1216 6 років тому

      @@_captain_N Literally everything would be dark when you put them on, and you yourself will get cancer.

  • @german2122
    @german2122 4 роки тому +3

    3:55 aigh you got me there ngl

  • @enigmaman334
    @enigmaman334 6 років тому +30

    I'm sorry Kyle, but I don't think x-ray vision would be as bad as you think. You say that you'd mostly see nothing in x-ray vision, but I don't think it's true for the same reason why half your vision isn't black when you cover one eye with your hand. My assumption on what would happen if someone had x-ray vision is that their brain would overlap what they see in x-ray vision with what they see in visible light. Since the expectation isn't that they can only see x-rays but also see regularly, so it makes sense that the users brain would edit so that they see x-rays and visible light at the same time. This would also mean that the scene from man of steel that you showed earlier was scientifically correct. But that's just a hypothesis, not a theory, a hypothesis.

    • @michiplays00
      @michiplays00 6 років тому +2

      nick cottrell he was talking about a hypothetical situation in which we could only see xrays. If the range of visible light was extended to x-rays then the brain would just overlap the light information

    • @travisimmortalis2135
      @travisimmortalis2135 6 років тому +6

      Something similar already exists. There is a condition (I can't remember the technical/scientific name) where a person's lens in their eye does NOT block UV, like a normal eye's lens would. What a lot of people don't know, is that without the lens blocking UV light, the human eye actually CAN see it. People with this condition typically describe UV light sources as being a very pale purple, or slightly blue-ish white. It does in fact also have the added effect of causing flowers and things to look very different, much like Kyle described.
      So yes, having UV vision does not block out the rest of the spectrum, it only expands the upper limit of what the person can see. I think X-ray vision would be the same, just an expansion of the person's visible spectrum.

    • @jannegrey
      @jannegrey 6 років тому +2

      Also some X-ray sources (those very old tubes) were visible, especially in the dark, even through wooden door, or wooden walls. It wasn't direct visibility of course (though described as a yellowish glow) - but rather excitement of electrons in the eye, that when they dropped down to their normal state, they emitted this yellowish light. Or even some other photoelectric effect - I read about this a while ago. Obviously not good for health.

    • @marcelsevigny4957
      @marcelsevigny4957 6 років тому

      In fact, Kyle said exactly that you would almost see anything in x-ray vision, considering only the x-ray income. Knowing how our vision works, it very probable that we would only extend our upper limits, but this is true by only considering our eyes like an optics piece, and neglecting their biological aspect. Remember, X-Ray is really high energy and we did not evolve to manage so much energy. From an evolutionary point of view, it makes sense, X-ray is not an interesting feature since there's almost nothing to see with this. I don't think that it could improve your adaptation skill in anyway. "Life always finds a way" to answer your question "because science !" (Meeting between Malcom and Kyle)

    • @demonwarb1
      @demonwarb1 6 років тому

      There could be a series of nictating membranes that could filter out varying wavelengths, which would allow the varying types of vision. I don't really know how this would explain the scene shown, though.

  • @ronindrix2272
    @ronindrix2272 6 років тому +18

    Am i the only one who didn't take x-ray vision as literal? I never thought they were actually using x-rays or any kind of electromagnetic radiation.
    I always thought it was the catchy name that made sense to people because they know what an x-ray is, and not the actual power.
    anyone else?

    • @Sheol02
      @Sheol02 6 років тому +5

      No, it's exactly the opposite - Kyle is the only one who though X-Ray vision is literally X-Rays. Everyone else who read comics/watched movies/etc with X-Ray vision being involved knows that it's just a name. Like how Batman isn't an actual werebat, but a man that dresses in a suit that somewhat resembles a bat.

    • @Sheol02
      @Sheol02 6 років тому +1

      The Boss
      And that disagrees with what exactly? That whatever light kryptonians are emitting from their eyes is called called x-rays in some iterations? And I've no doubt that there were absolutely Superman (the only source of X-Ray Vision in the entire fiction, apparently) stories where some writes actually meant literal X-Rays. But lightsaber isn't made out of light lorewise, but it was that way in the beginning.

    • @becausescience
      @becausescience  6 років тому +3

      Haha you REALLY take issue with this don't you -- KH

    • @Sheol02
      @Sheol02 6 років тому +1

      Yes, I do. That's very perceptive of you to notice.

    • @Sheol02
      @Sheol02 6 років тому +1

      @@1001-v1s no, not everyone.
      I can and with ease. Pretty much any character in a video game with stealth has it nowadays.
      No, even in Superman it is not X-rays. Just because it is called similar doesn't mean it's the same thing. I already mentioned lightsaber, thanks for deliberately ignoring that point. I may also mention, that the planet Krypton is not made out of Krypton, a noble gas.
      And this is the last time I'm replying to you if are going to keep redirecting the conversation into superman. It's not about him, and your only argument with him is weak anyway (if you don't conveniently ignore points against it, like you did the last time).

  • @akramussx7200
    @akramussx7200 6 років тому +20

    You just keep crushing my dreams over and over again with every video you make

  • @dennisestrada332
    @dennisestrada332 5 років тому

    This was my senior project at FAU as an electrical engineer. Through the wall radar imagining using wifi signals in the bandwidth of 2.4GHz. I was able to detect object behind reinforced concrete!

  • @AlexHeisEngholm
    @AlexHeisEngholm 6 років тому +7

    The WIFI vision would be hard to use or to focus with in 3D. How would you filter out?

    • @peterhoemke2994
      @peterhoemke2994 2 роки тому

      I would imagine that the more the wifi would travel through the more scattered and absent it would become. Say one substance blocks range AA, and another closer one blocks AK, and another blocks BH, etc all the way till it reaches you. That would be the absent aspect of it. Then imagine the nearby surroundings that reflect these ranges, which would necessarily also reduce the presence and alter the perception of origin, similar to the process of smudging parts of a picture.
      If you combine the two, the clarity of objects would probably be one of the primary give aways for order of proximity (as in, in this context, how many objects are between me and the item in question). Then, if this was simply an additional function for the brain's normal processes, combining several senses together to generate our actual perception of spatial awareness, our brain could then give estimated distances and interference values to develop a new and more information-dense spatial awareness.
      Long story short, if combined with our other senses akin to the way our senses already assist one another, it would be less of a vision-oriented sense and more of an enhanced spatial-awareness with limited or no actual visual impact.
      At least, this is what I figure it would be like.

  • @silvertigeronthewall
    @silvertigeronthewall 6 років тому +11

    I actually know someone who claims to be able to see in ultraviolet. A long time ago my grandfather had the lens in his eyes replaced. Those old lens allow him to see ultraviolet, but he also mentioned an unfortunate downside. Eyeball sunburn.

    • @catman171
      @catman171 6 років тому +1

      Paul Mehlerlie

    • @catman171
      @catman171 6 років тому +2

      Lie

    • @yokayomithepowerscaler1740
      @yokayomithepowerscaler1740 6 років тому

      Does anybody else find him just annoying and unfunny

    • @catman171
      @catman171 6 років тому +2

      Scyttles The Original yeah idiot you are the unfunny person

  • @salvsays
    @salvsays 6 років тому +5

    Wifi vision vs echo location who would win? Lets say daredevil in universe 1 million had wifi vision instead of regular sight and he fought our current daredevil. How would that go? Could you do anything to disrupt wifi vision the same way that echo location could be disrupted with loud noises?

    • @sevorisdoe2846
      @sevorisdoe2846 6 років тому +1

      WiFi Imaging *can* be disrupted. The first trick is to line walls with metal, like multiple layers of tinfoil. That will weaken signal propagation. A faraday cage will swallow up WiFi signals wholesale and create "blind walls" that way as well. You can also create complex reflective sculptures of tinfoil that add reflection noise into an environment, eventually causing so much reflection you just can't get coherent data out of the signal mess anymore.
      Doing this actively on the other hand is tricky, and I daresay almost nigh-impossible. Just adding raw WiFi radiation to the mix will not do a thing. Chaotic switching on-and-off of emitters and the resulting signal interference might do a thing. Alternatively, for one signal processing method I discussed with Kyle, you could create 2.4/5Ghz radiation holographic waveform emitters and create false positives and noise *that* way.
      Both of those require quite comprehensive and complex implementations to work however. Your best and cheapest bet really is just a lot of reflective metal. Or turning your WiFi off. By pulling the plug physically. Because learning to hack WiFi emitters on is the next best thing to get after WiFi vision.

    • @salvsays
      @salvsays 6 років тому

      Sevoris Doe hmm i see, so in my scenario its highly unlikely that either would know how the others ability would work. Atleast not at first. So in a straight fight it would be easier to disrupt echo location over wifi vision even if you had devices that emitted wifi signals such as phones, routers, etc. because my thought process was, in the streets of NYC it would be impossible to see due to all the clutter, but wifi vision could easily see through all that.
      I like the fact that just coating yourself in tinfoil would mess someone up, it would definitely be interesting to see two almost blind people duke it out, while one is covered in tin foil and one is shouting at the top of their lungs or blaring an air horn.

    • @salvsays
      @salvsays 6 років тому

      Sevoris Doe oh wait, you would need to not just be covered in tin foil but also have antlers and tendrils in order to absorb all the signals. That just gets even better! Someone needs to draw this.

    • @Milkyway_Squid
      @Milkyway_Squid 6 років тому

      Wifi vision could probably be jammed with a wifi jammer

    • @salvsays
      @salvsays 6 років тому

      Milkyway Squid well i dont think he is emitting wifi he is just detecting it, the jammer i dont think absorbs wifi it just prevents it from being read in a radius. So although clever, i dont think that would work.

  • @Baergrillt
    @Baergrillt Рік тому +2

    So isnt this what Bales Batman does in Part 2? In the building?