I went to Munich University to study Electronic Media at 65. My professor asked me why I studied this programme, I told him at the time I graduated from university the term 'electronic media' was still not in the dictionary!!
Google Really Does Make The World a better more enlightened place educating people with the best most clear concise and credible above all credible high quality information sharing and I just love and adore everything you guys and girls #feminism are doing there thank you for everything
Jottings: - Theme: Trends for the next decade - May be 2028!! acceleration due to pandemic. - Center of population is going to shift: from east to south Asia, Europe to Africa - Young population: China down, India up, US as is. US young would be minorities. - Old population: largest market almost everywhere. New tech for them!! - Immigration for elderly-care being restricted, tech is needed. - Robotics for home, assistive, companionship - Financial abuse of elderly, mostly by known folks. - Leapfrogging in technology: Africa starting mobile payments. - Collaboration/Sharing: food, [transport], clothing
Prof. Guillen, why do you describe women spending more time with children as "unfortunate"? As you say, men and women are different, and these differences are not reducible to mere social convention or expectation. Men and women have certain tendencies that follow from them being men and women. These tendencies may, of course, manifest in superficially different ways that have to do with prevailing circumstances and pressures. However, social conventions and expectations can either align with male and female nature and respect these differences and the purposes behind them, giving men and women the space to freely flourish, or they can frustrate and impede them. In this case, we know that maternal nurturing is especially important early in a child's life and so the tendency for women to express their nature in this way is expected. Even in the absence of cultural expectations in this regard, you would expect to see the behavior of women tending toward maternal nurturing, though social norms can encourage respect for the needs of the mother and child by habituating certain proper attitudes toward these things. Sadly, many in the soft sciences draw on a flawed philosophical anthropology (broadly Cartesian, Lockean, Spinozian, or Hegelian). A flawed philosophical anthropology is disastrous and has the potential to lead to disastrous outcomes when translated into policy and accepted norm. It is important to be explicit about our philosophical anthropological presuppositions so that they can be examined instead of insinuated and blindly accepted. In terms of career statistics, I am aware of statistics that indeed show a disparity between the sexes w.r.t. average income, choice of occupation, and the like. For example, the average income of men is indeed higher than the average income of women, but if you break down the statistics and look for the causes of this disparity, what you find is that women tend to choose occupations that pay less in exchange for less tangible benefits (like safety, comfort, the sorts of things that follow from what you said about women and risk aversion). Men, on the other hand, tend to choose occupations that involve greater risk and longer hours, both of which are correlated with greater pay. Also, statistics done in countries like Norway show that countries that have a longer history of adopting and enforcing egalitarian social norms actually see a reversion of men and women into occupations that were considered stereotypical for each sex. This supports what I said, and what you briefly concede, that men and women are different and these differences lead to differences in the statistics having to do with choice. That doesn't mean we won't have female engineers or male nurses, or that we should prevent those kinds of occupational choices, but we should respect the fact that men and women will TEND to choose different occupations owing to their sex differences and not because of cultural expectations. We cannot allow ideological motives to determine cultural norms and policy. I look forward to seeing what you find in your planned statistical studies.
His "unfortunate" comment was about women having to take care of more than the 50% of household tasks, not around women spending time with their children
I went to Munich University to study Electronic Media at 65. My professor asked me why I studied this programme, I told him at the time I graduated from university the term 'electronic media' was still not in the dictionary!!
Google Really Does Make The World a better more enlightened place educating people with the best most clear concise and credible above all credible high quality information sharing and I just love and adore everything you guys and girls #feminism are doing there thank you for everything
Google is your overlord. Welcome to surfdom.
Sarcasm?
Jottings:
- Theme: Trends for the next decade
- May be 2028!! acceleration due to pandemic.
- Center of population is going to shift: from east to south Asia, Europe to Africa
- Young population: China down, India up, US as is. US young would be minorities.
- Old population: largest market almost everywhere. New tech for them!!
- Immigration for elderly-care being restricted, tech is needed.
- Robotics for home, assistive, companionship
- Financial abuse of elderly, mostly by known folks.
- Leapfrogging in technology: Africa starting mobile payments.
- Collaboration/Sharing: food, [transport], clothing
just want to say. a good conversation. a smart man. but NOT ENOUGH, not nearly enough.
Pwoli machanmare🔥🔥🔥🤑
Hi mallu
outstanding thank you so much fo this
Very good bad good conversation
😐
Anyone got a TLDW for this?
e ink screens. blue light does damage.
Prof. Guillen, why do you describe women spending more time with children as "unfortunate"? As you say, men and women are different, and these differences are not reducible to mere social convention or expectation. Men and women have certain tendencies that follow from them being men and women. These tendencies may, of course, manifest in superficially different ways that have to do with prevailing circumstances and pressures. However, social conventions and expectations can either align with male and female nature and respect these differences and the purposes behind them, giving men and women the space to freely flourish, or they can frustrate and impede them. In this case, we know that maternal nurturing is especially important early in a child's life and so the tendency for women to express their nature in this way is expected. Even in the absence of cultural expectations in this regard, you would expect to see the behavior of women tending toward maternal nurturing, though social norms can encourage respect for the needs of the mother and child by habituating certain proper attitudes toward these things.
Sadly, many in the soft sciences draw on a flawed philosophical anthropology (broadly Cartesian, Lockean, Spinozian, or Hegelian). A flawed philosophical anthropology is disastrous and has the potential to lead to disastrous outcomes when translated into policy and accepted norm. It is important to be explicit about our philosophical anthropological presuppositions so that they can be examined instead of insinuated and blindly accepted.
In terms of career statistics, I am aware of statistics that indeed show a disparity between the sexes w.r.t. average income, choice of occupation, and the like. For example, the average income of men is indeed higher than the average income of women, but if you break down the statistics and look for the causes of this disparity, what you find is that women tend to choose occupations that pay less in exchange for less tangible benefits (like safety, comfort, the sorts of things that follow from what you said about women and risk aversion). Men, on the other hand, tend to choose occupations that involve greater risk and longer hours, both of which are correlated with greater pay. Also, statistics done in countries like Norway show that countries that have a longer history of adopting and enforcing egalitarian social norms actually see a reversion of men and women into occupations that were considered stereotypical for each sex. This supports what I said, and what you briefly concede, that men and women are different and these differences lead to differences in the statistics having to do with choice. That doesn't mean we won't have female engineers or male nurses, or that we should prevent those kinds of occupational choices, but we should respect the fact that men and women will TEND to choose different occupations owing to their sex differences and not because of cultural expectations. We cannot allow ideological motives to determine cultural norms and policy. I look forward to seeing what you find in your planned statistical studies.
His "unfortunate" comment was about women having to take care of more than the 50% of household tasks, not around women spending time with their children
Thia chat is controlled from angry comments
Sex Robots for Retirees, Got it.
its good to be in the future lol
There are! In Japan and they are better than human women!
Second one again
this elder consumer is looking for a elder living facility that only serves organic food cooked from scratch.
25:00
Why are you missing a partner? Is it his mistake?
So annoying when people speak statements in question tone. I can't even listen to the rest of this.
Lesbian + Gay on the show
Upward Inflection
Is it just me or does this dude lack clarity.
Senior consumer buy MEDICATIONS jesus.... Invest into pharmacy.
But you both skip the most important factor of the future: Islam.
Demographically important But economically and technologically insignificant
Another neoliberal talk. I give up.
24:30
Why are you missing a partner? Is it his mistake?