It wasn’t on my radar as such as i have a full fat Royal version already, but this was such a good deal i bought both versions for a bit of converting later on! Bargains they are!!! Well done TMC!!
Not sure if it’s my cup of tea, but it’s certainly an attractive choice for someone who wants a locomotive to run all the time. On the cheap, that is!!
Hi Jenny, I’ve had Royal Diamond 67 for awhile now. Had no problems with any noise, I do have mine chipped with a Hornby R8549 decoder. Yes it runs great. Great review as usual.
These are decent models when at the lower price, but I'd take a 2nd hand re-tool version over them as often can be found for a little more. I much preferred this loco with the EWS beasties on it. Ace video as always.
This is what I was wondering ie how do you know which are the re-tooled versions. I have several of the original release 67s which I assume are the basis of these RR Plus models now (keeping up with the Hornby RR, RR+ and re-tooled models is a full time job) to get best VFM. I find the underframe detail on the std issue a bit non-desript. Was the Royal Diamond in the EWS managers pack with the EWS Beasties on it the re-tooled version, and did it have sound fitted as I have seen mentioned elsewhere? Thanks for any information.
@@paredding The quickest way to spot the retool is the top cooler grill is actually a grill, not a moulded piece into the roof, and the retool also has working top lights and red backwards lights.
I bought the maroon Queens Messenger version which has extra nameplates along with a class 67 TTS sound decoder for less tan £100. You really cannot go wrong at that price. Performs better than models costing twice as much.
It passes the "3 foot test". Also, you don't get all the seperately fitted detailed parts falling off the first time you pick the thing up! Shame the mechanism isn't a but more robust. But still, a great value model.
Another really useful and educational video. I have a couple of Lima 67s in store and you have prompted me to get them out, chipped and on the layout. I bet a stay-alive would be useful on the Hornby model,
Nice video - I'd suggest taking a more detailed look at how the couplings are fitted - as they are not NEM sockets or the old Airfix style clip-in design, so would be difficult to change for narrow tension lock (or other designs of coupling).
@@MistaMatthews Are you talking about the same tooling as I can't get the existing coupling to detach like the Airfix ones do and the diagram in the leaflet that came with the model shows a very odd fitting. EDIT: OK I have now got the existing coupling detached and definitely Airfix style clip in couplings will not work
@@cwmpencwrwmodelrailway1801 yep. Same tooling. I’d show you a picture but I don’t know how through UA-cam. The couplings on this 67 can be unclipped which leaves a small notch underneath. The Airfix hunt coupling can be glue around it which creates the perfect height and distance.
@@MistaMatthews Ahh I should have stated they cannot be changed without modification or using glue (as I like to change couplings on locos in a way that can be changed back)
Even better is the set theyve got with Rails for £119. 67 plus wagons track mat controller oval plus siiding...bit of a bargain for a starter train set.
Why have Hornby removed the quality flywheel twin bogie drive system? That was the best feature of the Lima 67. It's also odd Hornby haven't used the NEM bogie they designed for the Lima 67. They've deliberately made this model worse, perhaps to differentiate it from their, now mediocre, full fat 67.
@@pareddingIt's not up to the modern standards of Accurascale and Cavalex. It lacks fine detail, the cab interior is crude grey plastic with no additional parts and nothing is painted. Cab doors don't open, it's only 8 pin so lacks dcc functionality. It's also poorly built especially the first batch with scratches and paint touch ups by the factory. It's ok but could have been so much better.
These are not cheap models, check the RRP! They are reliable, good value models at a knock out price by TMC, lets see anyone of the other manufacturers get something like this as good as Hornby. Ideal for conversion and upgrading by those with more imagination than maybe money!!
I got this model in the tmc offers as well as the blue 56, and while the silver 67 runs with no issues, I'm having to send the 56 back cos it isn't working!!
@@davidtucker8724 sounds like the dreaded seized motor. Hornby had a few bad motors that slipped through QC. Whilst the motor can be replaced, the best bet is to contact the shop and get it exchanged under warranty.
Deluxe Models canopy glue is also ideal for the nameplates as it has excellent grab, super clear when dry!
It wasn’t on my radar as such as i have a full fat Royal version already, but this was such a good deal i bought both versions for a bit of converting later on! Bargains they are!!! Well done TMC!!
Not sure if it’s my cup of tea, but it’s certainly an attractive choice for someone who wants a locomotive to run all the time. On the cheap, that is!!
Hi Jenny, I’ve had Royal Diamond 67 for awhile now. Had no problems with any noise, I do have mine chipped with a Hornby R8549 decoder. Yes it runs great. Great review as usual.
Thanks!
I bought the same one.
Very good loco.
Certainly value for money.
Take care Jenny
Basil.
These are decent models when at the lower price, but I'd take a 2nd hand re-tool version over them as often can be found for a little more. I much preferred this loco with the EWS beasties on it. Ace video as always.
This is what I was wondering ie how do you know which are the re-tooled versions. I have several of the original release 67s which I assume are the basis of these RR Plus models now (keeping up with the Hornby RR, RR+ and re-tooled models is a full time job) to get best VFM. I find the underframe detail on the std issue a bit non-desript. Was the Royal Diamond in the EWS managers pack with the EWS Beasties on it the re-tooled version, and did it have sound fitted as I have seen mentioned elsewhere? Thanks for any information.
@@paredding The quickest way to spot the retool is the top cooler grill is actually a grill, not a moulded piece into the roof, and the retool also has working top lights and red backwards lights.
@@TheseTwoRails Great - thanks for the info
A good example and I enjoyed the video, Jen!! Great show!!
Thanks!
I bought the maroon Queens Messenger version which has extra nameplates along with a class 67 TTS sound decoder for less tan £100. You really cannot go wrong at that price. Performs better than models costing twice as much.
It passes the "3 foot test". Also, you don't get all the seperately fitted detailed parts falling off the first time you pick the thing up!
Shame the mechanism isn't a but more robust.
But still, a great value model.
Another really useful and educational video. I have a couple of Lima 67s in store and you have prompted me to get them out, chipped and on the layout. I bet a stay-alive would be useful on the Hornby model,
Great video Jen certainly seems a bargain I think Hornby has done well with the Railroad enhanced versions
Well done Zoe!!
Nice video - I'd suggest taking a more detailed look at how the couplings are fitted - as they are not NEM sockets or the old Airfix style clip-in design, so would be difficult to change for narrow tension lock (or other designs of coupling).
Replacement couplings need modifying to fit but it can be done.
I replaced the couplings with Hunts designed for Airfix. They fit surprisingly well.
@@MistaMatthews Are you talking about the same tooling as I can't get the existing coupling to detach like the Airfix ones do and the diagram in the leaflet that came with the model shows a very odd fitting.
EDIT: OK I have now got the existing coupling detached and definitely Airfix style clip in couplings will not work
@@cwmpencwrwmodelrailway1801 yep. Same tooling. I’d show you a picture but I don’t know how through UA-cam. The couplings on this 67 can be unclipped which leaves a small notch underneath. The Airfix hunt coupling can be glue around it which creates the perfect height and distance.
@@MistaMatthews Ahh I should have stated they cannot be changed without modification or using glue (as I like to change couplings on locos in a way that can be changed back)
I've ordered myself one with them wish it had red tail lights as well but least I didn't pay full price
TMC...Colas Rail model out of stock. Excellent review Jen
Wow, they moved fast!
Thanks!
Nice and thorough review!
Studio lighting? My lighting gives me the same effect!! But it’s just normal home lighting.
You should have seen it before I spent an hour adjusting the colours on the footage. That damn silver reflected *everything*!
Even better is the set theyve got with Rails for £119. 67 plus wagons track mat controller oval plus siiding...bit of a bargain for a starter train set.
That’s not bad, especially as a Christmas present for someone.
Does it have lights, couldn't tell from the video. Good review all round.
As shown in the video, there are directional lights showing white in the forward direction.
I haven't bought another Railroad model since the class 47 a couple of years ago. Truly awful haulage capacity - 4 coaches.
Have you covered buildings & scenery before ? Only asking coz I’m new to this hobby & I’ve wanted one since I was a child
Yes, I have videos covering every aspect of the hobby.
Great looking model , just too modern image for me .
Why have Hornby removed the quality flywheel twin bogie drive system? That was the best feature of the Lima 67. It's also odd Hornby haven't used the NEM bogie they designed for the Lima 67.
They've deliberately made this model worse, perhaps to differentiate it from their, now mediocre, full fat 67.
Why is the newly tooled 'full fat' Class 67 'mediocre? Just curious. Thanks
@@pareddingIt's not up to the modern standards of Accurascale and Cavalex. It lacks fine detail, the cab interior is crude grey plastic with no additional parts and nothing is painted. Cab doors don't open, it's only 8 pin so lacks dcc functionality. It's also poorly built especially the first batch with scratches and paint touch ups by the factory. It's ok but could have been so much better.
Hornby are selling the better TFW class 67 for £99 at the moment.
Still a x Lima locomotive
That silver 67 is certainly a good looking locomotive!! It’s one of those cheap jack models that you get if you’re poor!!
Not necessarily if your poor!! Much room for a bit of customisation on a decent base!
Cheap for a reason. Better off buying a decent second hand model
These are not cheap models, check the RRP! They are reliable, good value models at a knock out price by TMC, lets see anyone of the other manufacturers get something like this as good as Hornby. Ideal for conversion and upgrading by those with more imagination than maybe money!!
I got this model in the tmc offers as well as the blue 56, and while the silver 67 runs with no issues, I'm having to send the 56 back cos it isn't working!!
@@davidtucker8724 out of curiosity, what was the issue with the 56?
I have heard of some having seized motors.
@@JenniferEKirk hi Jenny it worked briefly but sounded awful. Now won't work at at, though directional lights come on 😟
@@davidtucker8724 sounds like the dreaded seized motor. Hornby had a few bad motors that slipped through QC. Whilst the motor can be replaced, the best bet is to contact the shop and get it exchanged under warranty.