Dinesh D'Souza - Liberty University Convocation
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 бер 2012
- On March 30, 2012 at Convocation, North America's largest weekly gathering of Christian students, Dr. Dinesh D'Souza, New York Time bestselling author, speaker and president of The King's College in NYC, spoke to Liberty University students about how a good God can allow evil and suffering in the world.
D'Souza has been called one of the "top young public-policy makers in the country" by Investor's Business Daily and has become known as a major influencer on public policy through his writings. He has also been named one of America's most influential conservative thinkers by the New York Times Magazine.
![ПОЛНАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ЭКЗОРЦИЗМА [Топ Сикрет]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qBySr6Bt0B8/mqdefault.jpg)
Brilliant address, I agree, but I was pained to see that Dinesh left out the impact on us of our suffering and of sharing the suffering of others. When we suffer, it changes us, as it did Job, and we are better for it, unless we let it defeat us and let it corrode our faith in a loving Lord. Our feelings about suffering will dramatically change, too, when we can see it all from the eternal perspective and how it benefitted us to deal with it, with help from Him & other believers.
Dinesh; the best debater there is.
yes very sharp like a samurai
Brilliant!!
By the way, and on a completely different topic - I do like Mr. D'Souza film "2016", and think that he is completely right about Obama.
Dinesh is awesome! love listening to him talk on youtube
Dinesh Dsouza is brilliant.
He doesn't need details he needs to simply show that evolution and the big bang don't make sense.
Why shouldn't God be jealous he created everything and the one thing he asks for is for us to believe and we regularly slap God in the face when we turn away from him. God created us so we could give him glory and we SHOULD BE HAPPY he wanted to create us. Simply put...
Using big words doesn't make you smarter or your argument any cleverer.
One can only imagine which of the words appear to be "big" to your small brain...
funny the indian mister bean is more than enough to destroy your atheist patron saints lol
If you accept the premise, everything follows.
Its not step 27 or 42 where the logical fallacy lies, its in the assumption - the question you ask that is couched in the mythology and presumptions from which all naturally follows.
Witness a lecture that demonstrates this.
I thought that John Calvin's false premise on Omnipotent will take root in Dinesh,but Dinesh quash his evil ideas.Creator God is known more like a Father,who loves,yearn and expect the return of the lost sheep.Interestingly God reveals that He didn't know how many will eventually come to Him,but he expects many because of His love.If any man willing,let him come.This is the way things just are,just as God just are like that.
If you compare Christianity to every other religion you get to vastly different outcomes lol.
I'm sorry your using words that are unneeded for you to get your point across. That better if you want me to use big and breathy sentences. i like to put things simply doesn't make me stupid. I have a six year degree in Computer Science I like to think myself very smart. I'm a coder my job is to make the code work with as little stuff as possible. So I tend to make my thoughts the same way.
If life didn't exist before then how did "life" adjust to where the sun was the simple fact is you can't prove your theory i can you didn't even watch Dinish's debates or you didn't listen to his facts.
Indian Mr Bean.
I reckon William Lane Craig is better though
But then, the religious man makes a far greater assumption based on no evidence whatsoever - that there is a god! (and no, the gospels are not proof of anything, since they could well have been all made up).
On the other hand, atheists do not claim that they have absolute certainty of anything that has not been scientifically proven beyond any doubt. If new scientific evidence that contradicts our way of thinking is discovered, we will be willing to reconsider our stance.