Intro to Solids of Revolution (3 of 3: Other axes, volume of a sphere)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 вер 2024
  • More resources available at www.misterwootube.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 41

  • @MaeveFirstborn
    @MaeveFirstborn 6 років тому +44

    I just found this channel and I gotta say, this is some of the most entertaining math I've seen in a long time.

  • @pikachu8620
    @pikachu8620 6 років тому +14

    SIR PLEASE DONT STOP MAKING VIDEOS. THESE ARE REALLY HELPFUL

  • @jimmytan6263
    @jimmytan6263 3 роки тому +8

    4:50 the upper boundary is supposed to be 9 not 2, for anyone confused

  • @nayankishnani
    @nayankishnani 6 років тому +11

    Why doesn't this have like a million views??

  • @BariScienceLab
    @BariScienceLab 3 роки тому +2

    Jesus christ, what a teacher!

  • @christir2605
    @christir2605 3 роки тому +4

    WOW! Such a succint explanation for the volume of a sphere! Blew my mind. Love it!

  • @MuhdiskandarDavlinfelix
    @MuhdiskandarDavlinfelix 6 років тому +20

    How I love math. Watching your videos at 5am. If my math classes was made simple when I was studying in high school.

  • @zefanyapardede2867
    @zefanyapardede2867 6 років тому +16

    okay, WOW i wish you were my math teacher. time to transfer schools...

  • @gouravbanik2907
    @gouravbanik2907 6 років тому +8

    Inspiring as always. Keep up the good work sir!!

  • @richardgarrison8328
    @richardgarrison8328 2 роки тому +1

    I would give this video a million likes if I could. I am having to code this and for the life of me could not understand it, but now I do. thank you so much.

  • @MartyThun
    @MartyThun Рік тому +1

    How's your brain doing? 😅 Love it mr. Woo.

  • @timbryars8614
    @timbryars8614 6 років тому +2

    Just great! Thank you.

  • @atishmistry6959
    @atishmistry6959 4 роки тому +2

    this is amazing. thank you!!

  • @benrogers5622
    @benrogers5622 6 років тому +2

    This is awesome

  • @cheezkeyk
    @cheezkeyk 2 роки тому

    The limits in terms of y should be 9 and 0. This is still amazing🥰🥰

  • @redsisco_
    @redsisco_ 2 роки тому

    if i had to describe the latter half of this video in 3 words it would be "cathartic sphere mindblowing"

  • @heba1328
    @heba1328 3 роки тому

    Very nice explanation, thank you.

  • @noamroyale6029
    @noamroyale6029 4 роки тому +2

    why are we not infegrating pie? or is pie integrated is pie itself?(this is a stupid question so please don't laugh at me) ( 8:37 ), I think that the integration of pie needs to be xπ because pie is just a number. (please answer this question 🥺)

    • @wank5702
      @wank5702 4 роки тому

      You would do that if it were an addition of pie and the (r^2-x^2). However, here it is pi TIMES (r^2-x^2) , so you antiderive the (r^2-x^2) and leave the constant (pi) as it is. I think this is one of the antiderivative rules. Hope it helps!

    • @moizmasood9625
      @moizmasood9625 3 роки тому

      Sorry if im late but thats probably because pie is not part of the original function so thats why we dont integrate it ( ur question was nice tho)

    • @carultch
      @carultch Рік тому +1

      Pi is a constant, so you can pull it out in front of the integral. Just as if you were given k*x^2 to integrate, you can multiply k by the integral of x^2.

  • @Raymond.Motshabi
    @Raymond.Motshabi Рік тому

    spongooo!

  • @ahappyimago
    @ahappyimago 2 роки тому

    Amazing

  • @skylar011
    @skylar011 3 роки тому

    Isn't it supposed to be the square root of y??? x^2=y... x=sqrt(y)......

  • @bhavyajain01
    @bhavyajain01 Рік тому

    ay^2=x^3 ko x=0 to x= 4a rotated about y axis then value of surface area ...
    Sir please make video on thi

  • @binzsta86
    @binzsta86 6 років тому

    Isn't it suppose to be y^3, not y^2?

  • @mkt92z
    @mkt92z 6 років тому +4

    The bounds for you fist solid of revolution problem is 0-9 not 0-2.

  • @jewel8482
    @jewel8482 3 роки тому

    I didnt understand the step when he integrated r^2 = r^2 x

    • @DreamGuy6999
      @DreamGuy6999 3 роки тому +2

      Dont confuse urself. Look, he is integrating x. (Dx)
      Since x has a power of 0 on r2, when integrating, it becomes 0+1 = 1
      The 1 divides by r2 and x to the power 1 is 1
      Thus u get r2x/1 = r2x
      Just take r2 as a common number like 3
      When u integrate 3, u get 3x

  • @Mel-oc7pi
    @Mel-oc7pi 4 роки тому

    revelation !

  • @tgoh44001
    @tgoh44001 6 років тому

    Why is the volume of the sphere the integral of pi y^2 dx? For the parabola y = x^2, but here y = sqrt(r^2 - x^2)?

    • @andresxj1
      @andresxj1 6 років тому +2

      Terry Shannon The volume of the sphere is the sum of the cylinders you get rotating the little rectangles from the integral of the function around the *x* axis.
      Let me explain it: first of all, the function we are interested in is *y = sqrt(r² - x²)* (I'll explain why at the end), so the integral of that function would be the sum of little rectangles with width *dx* and height *y* (and remember that *y = sqrt(r² - x²)* ). So the area of the rectangles are *y·dx* , and the sum of all of them (the integral) is the area under the function.
      But we want a volume of the sphere, and how did we get the sphere? We rotated the.function (the semicircle) around the *x* axis, so the volume would be equal to that area rotated around the *x* axis. And remember the area is a bunch of rectangles, so the volume will be equal to the sum of those rectangles rotated around the *x* axis. And if you rotate a rectangle you get a cylinder. So the volume is equal to the sum of all the cylinders.
      The volume of a cylinder is equal to pi multiplied by its height and multiplied by its radius squared. Since we are rotating around the *x* axis the radius (the moving distance) is equal to *y* , and the height is a little portion ( infinitesimal) of the *x* axis: I mean *dx* . So the volume of a cylinder at any point will be *pi·dx·y²* , and if you rearrange: *pi·y²·dx* . Remember *y = sqrt(r² -x²)* , so finally we get *pi·(r²-x²)·dx* . But we want the volume of the whole sphere, so we want the sum of all those cylinders, and that's the integral from *-r* to *r* of *pi·(r²-x²)·dx* . Solve it and you get the formula!
      Now I'll answer your other question. I think you're confusing the parabola function and the circle function. They look alike, but they're not the same function. The equation of the parabola is *y = x²* and that means that for any *x* value, *y* is that *x* squared. If you plot the pair of values *(x,y)* you get the parabola.
      But the circle is something different. Its equation is *y = sqrt(r²-x²)* , but actually the most known form of it is *y² + x² = r²* . Let's take a look at it. First of all, *r* is just a number, not a variable. Its called *r* because it's the radius of the circle. So think of *r* as a fixed distance from the point *(0,0)* . It can be 1, it can be 5... But it's not a variable, it's a number you choose before plotting the circle function. Then we know that a circle with center at *(0,0)* and radius *r* is the set of points with a distance *r* from the center. And how can we write that? Well, take any point of the circle, then draw a line from it to the center (the radius), and draw another line from it to the *x* axis (perpendicularly). It's a triangle! The base is *x* , the height is *y* , and the hypotenuse is *r* . How can we relate those things? With the pythagorean theorem! Then you see that *y² + x² = r²* is the way to plot all the pair of values *(x,y)* (all the points) with a distance *r* (a number) from the center ( *(0,0)* ). And that's why *y = sqrt(r²-x²)* . It's not the same as a parabola.

    • @andresxj1
      @andresxj1 6 років тому +2

      Finally, if you're wondering why the equation only takes care of the up-semicircle and not the whole circle; it is by convention. Mathematicians agreed that, by definition, plotting a function *y* in terms of *x* could only have one solution for *y* given any *x* value. Nevertheless, *x* could have more solutions: when *y = x²* if you let *y = 4* , then could be *x = 2* , but also *x = -2* .
      But if *y² = x* and then *y = sqrt(x)* , for any value *x* there's only one solution (only if we are considering it a function). I know that for *x = 4* you could get *y = 2* and *y = -2*, but because of the definition of a function, we get rid of the negative value. And if you think about it, it makes sense, because if you plot *y = sqrt(x)* with the negative values for *x* included, then you cannot calculate the area under the function, because the positive area above the *x* axis would cancel out with the negative area below the *x* axis and you'll always get *0* . So in order to be possible to calculate an area (with the integral), we have to ignore the negative part of *y = sqrt(x)* . And the same happens with the circle: if you calculate the area of the circle as a function, till you'll get *0* because the up-area would cancel out with the down-area. So we have to get rid of the negative part of the circle, and we only consider the semicircle as the function from the equation *y² + x² = r²* . That's all.

    • @DreamGuy6999
      @DreamGuy6999 3 роки тому

      In simple words, apply the pythagorus theorem
      Keep a right angled triangle
      And ur work is done
      Take base as x
      Take perpendicular as y
      And take hypotenuse as r

  • @shubhamjani2509
    @shubhamjani2509 3 роки тому

    I didn't like maths much but now.....