Friedrich Nietzsche: 'On Truth And Lies In A Non Moral Sense' Explained

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @chilledxaura
    @chilledxaura 8 місяців тому +2

    6:10 I read through the essay while taking notes for the first time and highlighted this same quote!

  • @zagersr
    @zagersr 2 роки тому +4

    Great cocktail of enthusiasm and sarcasm man, keep it up

  • @smithj7U
    @smithj7U Рік тому

    Loved this description.

  • @avadraayer9066
    @avadraayer9066 2 роки тому +5

    This is an awesome explanation! Super easy to understand, and I love how casual it was :D thanks!

  • @asyouwish6108
    @asyouwish6108 10 місяців тому

    THAT WAS PHENOMENAL! THANK YOU!!!!

  • @madhusmitasahoo7374
    @madhusmitasahoo7374 2 роки тому +2

    Your elaborating style is awesome

  • @domeafavor5872
    @domeafavor5872 Рік тому +1

    I couldn't make heads or tails of this essay, thank you!!

  • @torreylee1882
    @torreylee1882 Рік тому

    Great job mate!!

  • @candyG1998
    @candyG1998 3 роки тому +3

    This is brilliant, thank you!

  • @JulkaBorghouts
    @JulkaBorghouts 10 місяців тому

    Thanks ! ❤ you made me laugh 😂😂 it kept me listening till the end

  • @barborashape4217
    @barborashape4217 3 роки тому +1

    Great video dude

  • @michaelventura8651
    @michaelventura8651 3 місяці тому

    I like your videos!

  • @deadman746
    @deadman746 2 роки тому +4

    If you look at a modern text of Cognitive Science, such as the early _Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things_ by George Lakoff (1987), you'll see that here Nietzsche anticipated pretty much of CS by a century, albeit from a philosophical rather than a scientific perspective. That's almost entirely aside from what you talk about. The concepts of metaphor, metonymy, embodiment, etc. as *the* basis of an accurate description of cognition have all been shown to be quite accurate.

  • @Abinaya-yoon
    @Abinaya-yoon 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you for saving me 🤍. Hope I'll answer the questions tomorrow in the exam......

  • @2001mariog
    @2001mariog Місяць тому

    this was a catarthic experience, thank you for the knowledge and the laughs hahahahaha

  • @bakmaharangana
    @bakmaharangana 8 місяців тому

    Essay - Link is not working

  • @sree9182
    @sree9182 2 роки тому +1

    Rational man rationalizes failure in one department (or part of life) by compensating with other attributes like intelligence. (because his aversiveness for failure is greater than his ability to succeed). Intuitive man on other hand might not have aversiveness to failure..........i am not sure what i am talking at this point.

  • @idicula1979
    @idicula1979 Рік тому

    Language is incomplete in conveying our most intimate thoughts, there fore we need connection we need relationships. Our modern world might convince us that relationship are liabilities but that just proves how toxic and Spartan the modern world is, to deny us our most basic of needs. In fact Capitalism forces a competition in us to drink our milkshake in terms the movie There Will Be Blood an adaptation of muckraking Ida Tarbell”s Oil a book about the exploitations of capitalism, and the Robber Barrons of early twentieth century standard oil. But the sort of competition a need in the modern world to put capital over all else, over our needs of connection, till it can be questioned who works for who the laborer for capital or the other way around? Multiplies on itself, feeds on its own psychosis till we humanity the apex of creation are left twisted little things, and all meaning is lost in language for we no longer seek connection, for the rat race of modern world. A world in which psychosis of constant working, even to the richest man (who apparently works 23/7 , even with his whole brood of children, maybe to plant microchips in them and send then to Mars) is a fetish. But if our lives are consumed in work are we an ubermensch, while history would say we are barely mensch.

  • @thyhomelessking
    @thyhomelessking 8 місяців тому

    lmao! 👑