A new way to turn the sun’s power into energy | The Edge

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 594

  • @patriot9455
    @patriot9455 6 років тому +7

    Rocky Ford, Colorado, USA, has a working unit of heat generation that they built in the median of a highway outside of town. It uses a liquified sulphur heat transfer system to heat a boiler that runs a steam generator. It is a closed system on the heat generating side as well as on the steam boiler. The station is fully enclosed and over 10 miles from town.

  • @user-ec2kd8sz3t
    @user-ec2kd8sz3t 6 років тому +9

    I like this lady's interviewing technique. Seems elegantly simple, just listen thoughtfully while nodding your head and then when the person you're interviewing stops talking repeat the last few words he said and wait for him to say something else. Brilliant.

  • @patriot9455
    @patriot9455 6 років тому +4

    There is a city in Colorado that uses a heat gathering system to generate electricity. It works well enough that they are fully self powered and have paid for the cost of the system by selling power to other cities.

  • @shailendrarae2159
    @shailendrarae2159 6 років тому +76

    I am from India, when I was just 14, I noticed that my mother used a box like contraption, coated black on the inside with something & had a funny glass like adjustable lid. It was called the "Solar Cooker". She would mix up the spices, vegetables or meat & ghee put it in a special container. Then she would do the same with rice, lentils or beans. Cover the containers, put them in this box like thing, adjust the glass lid at an angle & wait.
    In about an hours time the meal would be ready, a little longer in winters. This gave my family to have more time together.
    The food tasted just as good as if it was prepared in the traditional manner.
    This technology was being used in India way way back. I am 63 now & still many households use the "Solar Cooker" even today.

    • @maintoc
      @maintoc 6 років тому +5

      That's good to hear. For some years, I've been a supporter of this, especially for countries where, otherwise, women (it's usually women) have to walk for miles to collect wood for cooking fires. Please see: 1) www.solarcookers.org/index.php and 2) solarcooking.wikia.com/wiki/CooKit Thank you.

    • @ABaumstumpf
      @ABaumstumpf 6 років тому

      tinkering together one is on my list of little projects to do but here it is just a gimmick if you have one.
      But In less wealthy countries this thing really is Great.

    • @konstantinbodin9936
      @konstantinbodin9936 6 років тому +1

      Friend im from Serbia and my olds was making food by the sun in sumer they didnt use glas just metal like aluminium and iron that cooker we use today days in our ovens just without aluminium siler (today foil) in that tays they learn that from their parents and they loved bread from baked on sun. So sun energy isnd nothin new. Only new in alternative energy is needle like wind plants in UA Emirates. Wind turbine int new ppl use it centris ago they just make it modern, wather plants ppl also used in my vilage they stil use it like old tradition. But dams are modern versions. New is wave turbines... (les power) new from sun are photo cels other is modernisation of something old... greek used lwns and mirors too... so its nothing new ther just words...:) romans got wather heaters and coolers and air condisions first and we need to open windows and dors until recently... so there is low level of new things.

    • @jasoncougar194
      @jasoncougar194 6 років тому +4

      Of course india invinted it a long time ago. Hell the us stole the tech for the F35 from india and Russia stole the tech for the s400 and s500 from india.

    • @rahulchandra2164
      @rahulchandra2164 6 років тому +3

      he say 'used in india by his mother' not 'invinted by indians'. so pls read first...

  • @briangman3
    @briangman3 6 років тому +13

    Fantastic! I was evaluating this concept back in 2000 and I am glad to see it is making some headway. Inflatable mirrors are by far the cheapest because you reduce the large costs on mirrors. Main downside is it is resistance to windy locations. It will work well for sure. The balloon around the mirror keeps dust off the mirror but cuts down on light efficiency slightly. So Nice to see it working!

    • @ABaumstumpf
      @ABaumstumpf 6 років тому

      Or things like a bird or anything else puncturing the tube. The problem with temperature affecting the geometry, and other things.
      It can be a good cheap solution for some applications, but i am concerned about the longevity of this.

    • @gary.richardson
      @gary.richardson 6 років тому

      I agree!
      I think wind issues can be addressed similar to how poly greenhouses deal with that.

    • @gary.richardson
      @gary.richardson 6 років тому +1

      @@ABaumstumpf not any different than poly greenhouses. No issues with birds puncturing through worth worrying about. Especially poly films guaranteed for 10 years that can withstand UV degradation and 100+mph winds. Some of the designs give away for large flying objects but reattach.

  • @gary.richardson
    @gary.richardson 6 років тому +1

    I see some people don't quite get it. I admit that I'm a more visual person and the video did not demonstrate significance in cost. Cost advantage was only briefly mentioned during the video and could have been easily missed.
    People learn in different ways and diverting their attention more toward cost of manufacture needs to be done.

  • @bernardevans1703
    @bernardevans1703 Рік тому +1

    Wow!!! Awesome, is this scaleable

  • @American-In-Mykolaiv
    @American-In-Mykolaiv 6 років тому +2

    The largest solar furnace is at Odeillo in the Pyrénées-Orientales in France, opened in 1970. It employs an array of plane mirrors to gather sunlight, reflecting it onto a larger curved mirror.
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_furnace

  • @SuperFredAZ
    @SuperFredAZ 6 років тому +16

    the Spanish company Abengoa has built many multi megawatt plants all over the world, several years ago, using thermal heat from the sun.

  • @theGreaterAwareness
    @theGreaterAwareness 6 років тому +1

    My brother did this for University and in Australia they have a large scale power plant. I always called these a solar furnace - unless I'm misunderstanding something. Basically my brother had an array of 50 mirrors and he was boiling a trash can full of water. As for the large scale power-plant in Australia, they have a pipe of water that they heat and use that steam to spin turbines. Some people also do this with black aluminum pipes where the sun's heat is absorbed into the black aluminum and then the hot air is used to heat houses. The large bag/tank looks like it would be expensive to fix - I wonder how it deals with Hail stones.

  • @fmayer1507
    @fmayer1507 6 років тому +2

    This is awsome! This is the kind of technology we need to pursue.

  • @filosquartapecore
    @filosquartapecore 6 років тому

    I'm a bit skeptical about this. I did a quick calculation and i don't think this contraption can generate enough energy to be considered useful.
    Assuming the hoops are 8m diameter, spaced 9 meters each and there are 18 hoops, that makes up for a rectangular area of (18-1)x9x8 = 1224 m^2. Make it 1500 m^2.
    On average, in a sunny location, the radiant energy input is 200W per square meter. Again, make it 250 for an optimistic estimate.
    The total energy input for the device is 1500*250=375000W = 375KW.
    The amount of energy required to evaporate 1Kg of water (at 1 atm) is 2256.4 KJ, so with this power input, assuming 100% efficiency, the entire rack produces 375/2256.4 = 0.166 Kg of water per second (quite not enough for driving even a small turbine)

  • @ShaqReflects
    @ShaqReflects 6 років тому +2

    If you want to make a feasible thermal device that utilizes sunlight you have to think multidimensional in terms of energy input, energy stabilization, energy distribution and energy storage. The system you're building has to function in conjunction with other natural forces to have a consistent energy output and a way to store excess energy.

  • @nyiesah
    @nyiesah 6 років тому +1

    I was going to make a sick burn about Archimedes but it's actually kind of cool what they're doing I particularly liked the use of refrigerant

  • @th1alb
    @th1alb 6 років тому +1

    Wow, I'm surprised nobody thought of this new way until 2017! CNBC is clearly at the forefront of new technologies being invented, I'm impressed!

    • @camelhaydrogno7696
      @camelhaydrogno7696 Рік тому

      منذ اكثر من مئه وعشرين كانت وجربها الألمان وكانت سببا في كارثه

  • @jeremytheimer7443
    @jeremytheimer7443 3 роки тому +1

    It is not a new way to make usable energy. In 1901 someone made a steam engine that used a parabolic dish to concentrate the sunlight. It got a lot of interest but when coal prices went down nobody cared about it.

  • @konsul2006
    @konsul2006 6 років тому +2

    It does have a rather large footprint... But that is also true for a big scale solar reflector farm. One benefit I see is that you won't have birds killed by a solar death-ray :)

    • @cherylm2C6671
      @cherylm2C6671 Рік тому

      Thank you for your comment. Soft photovoltaic tubes can be bird-meshed, which may also be enough for more urban installations, especially in earthquake country. I'll look for info.

  • @kiveynen
    @kiveynen 6 років тому +2

    Finally.. i've been thinking for years now why noone ever build a giant solar-laser to generate energy. Glad it's happening at last. :)

  • @ruftime
    @ruftime 6 років тому +1

    Thought this looked familiar! GoSun is a brand portable solar food cookers that use this technology quite remarkably.

  • @Herbert04
    @Herbert04 6 років тому

    How much power will that put out? I look at the size and that is fine. But tell me what it will do.

  • @GSImproved90
    @GSImproved90 6 років тому +1

    Awesome! Just waiting for the roof shingle version before I buy.

  • @undertheradar4645
    @undertheradar4645 6 років тому +28

    "this thermal energy can be turned into electricity?"
    Is that a serious question?

    • @Yeet42069
      @Yeet42069 6 років тому +2

      I know right, like did you finish school before you even became a journalist? If you ask something that stupid you really didn't understand much.

    • @lovedalejoyana9785
      @lovedalejoyana9785 4 роки тому

      This is glorious, been searching for "how can we make electricity" for a while now, and I think this has helped. Have you heard people talk about - Diyadison Penhloe Blaster - (just google it ) ? It is an awesome one off product for generating your own electricity minus the normal expense. Ive heard some extraordinary things about it and my co-worker got cool results with it.

    • @wlicksilly
      @wlicksilly 3 роки тому

      He said it could go straight to turbine. I don't understand why we are still using fossil fuels.

    • @brentsido8822
      @brentsido8822 Місяць тому

      Perhaps she was asking the question not for herself but for those in the audience.

  • @smb123211
    @smb123211 6 років тому +1

    Why do folks feel compelled to post negative comments about great things like this? And why care if CNBC produces interesting videos for free? It's not like their demanding payment or forcing you to watch. What's revolutionary about this is not the technique but the portability, applications and concentrated power. Yes, we can cook a meal or light a fire or do lots of crazy things with a magnifying glass but providing power for industrial and commercial uses on a grand scale?
    The biggest applications are desalination plants and solar thermal power plants leading to the cheapest electricity in the world. Posters may "know" this is "nothing new" but firms from China, Saudi Arabia, Spain, etc disagree. What's telling (and sad) is that all this innovation is occurring outside the US where green lobbies have successfully prevented the building of small, solar-powered desalination plants for various reasons ("it wouldn't help" "too expensive" "We can solve the problem with conservation")

  • @justkiddin1980
    @justkiddin1980 6 років тому +1

    Interesting... but does it also work when its cloudy?? I think traditional solar panels also produce when its cloudy...

  • @Buzzhumma
    @Buzzhumma 6 років тому +1

    Combine this with hyper loop transport technology and you have all the positive. A total win win !

  • @funny-video-YouTube-channel
    @funny-video-YouTube-channel 6 років тому +6

    *Solar panels are winning,* because people can use them on their house.
    This system will be only useful to investors who can build expensive operations.

    • @terryturner3050
      @terryturner3050 6 років тому

      epSos.de longevity and maintenance plays a big game

    • @MsSomeonenew
      @MsSomeonenew 6 років тому +1

      It would be very useful even for houses if you have the space, apparently most of the power used in homes is usually put toward heating.

    • @lylestavast7652
      @lylestavast7652 6 років тому

      heating or cooling, depending on season and locale...

    • @gary.richardson
      @gary.richardson 6 років тому

      I think this may be scaled down some. At current scale, apartment units, small scale greenhouse operations, and a few other ideas come to mind. I would need to see how much different this tech may be to existing trough technology to elaborate more.

  • @michaelcampbell5567
    @michaelcampbell5567 6 років тому +60

    This is very old tech. A high tech version of this was on the roof of the IL agriculture building in the 90s.

    • @niceguyny1
      @niceguyny1 6 років тому

      Michael Campbell j

    • @russelldunning1584
      @russelldunning1584 6 років тому +4

      They were on the roofs of many buildings in the 1990's... abouts the time when the esteemed Homer J Simpson said solar was a pipedream... they were used for heating.
      ---
      Well, at the least, they pretty damn similar to the contraption in the video.

    • @bryanm6762
      @bryanm6762 6 років тому +7

      Michael Campbell yes the guy literally says that in the video.... He re-engineered it to make it cheaper

    • @kaikart123
      @kaikart123 6 років тому

      Bryan M re-engineered? You just need a steam generator, water, metal pipes and parabolic mirrors to do this. There is nothing else to be re-engineered.

    • @gary.richardson
      @gary.richardson 6 років тому +1

      @@kaikart123 reengineered to a lower manufacturing cost can still be reengineered. Engineers look at 3 things function, form, and cost. Or alternatively, cost, speed, and quality. Not only from a product perspective but also a manufacturability point of view.

  • @simonwarui8226
    @simonwarui8226 5 років тому +1

    You guys, can you come up with a cheaper way of storing this energy to be used for instance at night or during peak days? Storing energy could be the hardest part.

  • @pixelum2023
    @pixelum2023 6 років тому +6

    It's the title that's misleading, probably on purpose (click bait). The man in the video even says so about right in the middle.

  • @user-eu2vq4vq8f
    @user-eu2vq4vq8f 6 років тому +1

    Great job guys

  • @gerasimosmelissaratos6058
    @gerasimosmelissaratos6058 6 років тому +2

    I remember something similar running in Spain a few years ago, so although it's definitely nifty, classifying it as new is a bit too much.

  • @nishadburhan
    @nishadburhan 6 років тому

    Wow, people are really awesome.

  • @ohbobpleez
    @ohbobpleez 6 років тому +205

    I saw an advertisment in a 1950's magazine that cooked food using parabolic mirrors. Where is the new Technology?

    • @ruforufo2185
      @ruforufo2185 6 років тому +15

      exactly. parabolic reflectors have been around for very long time.
      what i find annoying is these guys think us half-wits wont know any better

    • @timmurphy5541
      @timmurphy5541 6 років тому +15

      The innovation is that they can produce the mirrors and tube roll-to-roll which makes the whole thing cheap. Apparently it also takes less water to clean them which is a big issue for solar collectors in hot and dry countries.

    • @iamthetinkerman
      @iamthetinkerman 6 років тому +12

      the point is to have the steam power a turbine which in turn powers a generator to produce more electricity than a PV solar cell you idiot! This is clearly way out of your depth to even understand this!

    • @evil001987
      @evil001987 6 років тому +58

      1:25 "This technology is nothing new, its been around since the beginning of the century"
      The video never claims it is new.

    • @小龙的梦
      @小龙的梦 6 років тому +3

      you get the comment award

  • @nattsurfaren
    @nattsurfaren 6 років тому

    After reading some more and mailing various scientists we concluded that the whole construction must rotate 2000 RPM in order for the heat transfer to accumulate to a stable plasma that can be converted into electricity.
    Can anyone confirm this?
    If this is the case then wouldn't the vibrations from the spin cause the ground to become unstable and shift the construction which in turn would prevent the sun from reaching the heat receiver?

    • @rncd999
      @rncd999 6 років тому +1

      We tried spinning it at that speed and it just flies into space, so for now we just track the sun with it :)

  • @fitrianhidayat
    @fitrianhidayat 6 років тому +1

    The guy literally said the technology isn't new, and the comments section is full of people saying this isn't new technology...

  • @-Mithunkokare
    @-Mithunkokare 3 роки тому

    Hi , i want details about this project, can anyone provide me details?

  • @subhajitsamanta2914
    @subhajitsamanta2914 6 років тому +1

    traditional way for multiplying solar power to A considerable level.👍

  • @tarun1792
    @tarun1792 6 років тому +42

    Basically large solar cookers

  • @explorelife-dr.gajendrarat2508
    @explorelife-dr.gajendrarat2508 6 років тому

    In India we are already using it for cooking food at shirdi temple.

  • @tomkelly8827
    @tomkelly8827 6 років тому +2

    This is a very good idea. On a very large scale it will make a lot of sense. The dairy and industrial uses are interesting as well.
    The problem I have with this type of technology is that it requires a tracking system. Lots of moving parts that will break down. Tracking does vastly improve efficiency but it requires more maintenance as well.
    This system is ideal for terraforming earth. Turning deserts into oaises. I imagine an ocean water pipeline running inland to a desert in any continent. A large array of these would either distill or make electricity to do reverse osmosis to make plenty of fresh water from the ocean. The sea salt can be harvested and minerals can be mined from the sea water to help to pay for this system.
    We have a great planet here. Let's practice making an uninhabitable places on earth habitable so that we will be really good at making a planet habitable. Then we will perhaps be up for the challenge of Mars or the moon. They have a whole lot of challenges though

  • @akashvengurlekar9671
    @akashvengurlekar9671 6 років тому

    This idea of intensifying sun rays to generate heat is already in application in Shirdi Sai Baba Mandir in India for cooking food. It was also documented by Discovery Channel in mega Kitchen India.

  • @melangreathouse2209
    @melangreathouse2209 6 років тому +2

    LOVE this New Technology! If they ever DO get it to market, and it takes hold, I would be a player for it, 65%cheaper than the current rate is NO laughing matter!

    • @DELHIBOMBAYDARBAR
      @DELHIBOMBAYDARBAR 5 років тому

      Mela'n. Please Google search Deferred Atkinson Cycle engine. See what can you do.

  • @rationalmale9216
    @rationalmale9216 6 років тому +1

    that system can be engineered with 80-90-% less mental in the system that holds the lenses saving more money and using less space.

  • @JbtSveZauzeto1
    @JbtSveZauzeto1 6 років тому +32

    When was this new? A few decades ago?

    • @ElazarusWills
      @ElazarusWills 6 років тому +1

      A new engineering spin on basic solar thermal ideas. Great! The more the merrier.

    • @vladnickul
      @vladnickul 4 роки тому

      YEP. it is new since 1960. invest in it, is not like the de top brass in there will basicly scam you for a six figure salary and let the company go bankrupt.

  • @asteptowomanenpowerment2011
    @asteptowomanenpowerment2011 6 років тому

    Good idea but What will happened when dust particals cover the lance. This is the major problem we are facing in solar energy.
    Pls elaborate.
    Thanks

    • @camelhaydrogno7696
      @camelhaydrogno7696 Рік тому

      لاتتغطى يمكن رشها بوليش مصنوعة بالنانوا تتزحلق ذرات الغبار ذاتيا

  • @peoplsrepublcOcali
    @peoplsrepublcOcali 6 років тому

    I am wearing a suit right now in a fancy building in Switzerland and I have some 1920's technology here....etc. LOL. Were do I sign up? Maybe if you had a nicer suit or if you were in Tahiti the product could be an even newer way.

    • @rncd999
      @rncd999 6 років тому

      Well the technology is actually from 1912 and this was filmed last year at the EXPO 2017 in Astana. You really like my suit? :D

    • @peoplsrepublcOcali
      @peoplsrepublcOcali 6 років тому

      Your suit is the bee's knees and your product is awesome. I guess that isn't your building so I apologize for that. I suppose everything from 1912 is "new" to cnbc, but kudos to you for bringing the actual date to light.

  • @Ferelmakina
    @Ferelmakina 6 років тому

    How is it better than traditional Cilinder-parabolic CSP plants?

  • @louf7178
    @louf7178 6 років тому

    It is typically referred to as the sun's energy. Power is the time rate of energy. The media getting off to the wrong start again.

  • @WhatDadIsUpTo
    @WhatDadIsUpTo 6 років тому

    You reinvented the wheel- WOW!

  • @heitor479
    @heitor479 6 років тому

    Put a plastic case around the trough: increase the costs: name it as a startup: success!

  • @sulaimanalkhateeb8408
    @sulaimanalkhateeb8408 5 років тому

    what's the name of the company??????

  • @Barskor1
    @Barskor1 6 років тому

    Such concepts can do desalinization with no ultra expensive pumps and reverse osmosis filters and can produce electricity rather than consume it.

  • @benitocamelo4143
    @benitocamelo4143 6 років тому

    People explaining this was old technology obviously did not see the video where the guy said it is not new technology but are using it to create smart technology. Do people just read titles of videos and go straight to the comments?

  • @kayrosis5523
    @kayrosis5523 6 років тому

    I don't think that this will scale to 100s of mwh but if they can make it cheap enough, it might be a good niche product

    • @baneblackguard584
      @baneblackguard584 6 років тому

      it will. using solar to turn water into steam is a scalable design. as long as you have the space to build it, you can keep scaling it up.

  • @Varunkm110
    @Varunkm110 4 роки тому +1

    Dude can you be more specific how much voltage and current you can supply for steel plant per day

  • @illam11
    @illam11 Рік тому

    What is the current update

  • @nikolatesla5553
    @nikolatesla5553 6 років тому

    This is essentially a giant evacuated solar tube. Lots of people heat their hot water with the small 2 in solar tubes.

  • @gary.richardson
    @gary.richardson 6 років тому

    If you are going to distill Fukushima water, this will do it for less cost than many other methods.

  • @honestmicky
    @honestmicky 6 років тому +1

    Excellent video, thanks for posting, much appreciated. New sub : )

  • @Jibbie49
    @Jibbie49 6 років тому

    At 1:36 he says that they have engineered technology that has been around for some time, just making it more efficient.

  • @zenzen9131
    @zenzen9131 6 років тому

    A mirror with a circular cross-section, as shown here, will not focus the sun's rays to a single point. It has to be parabolic to do this.

  • @MsSomeonenew
    @MsSomeonenew 6 років тому +2

    Well at least he was honest about it being old tech repackaged.
    No idea how this could be 55% cheaper then a mere trough mirror, but if that is a legitimate claim then by all means get these things going.

    • @ABaumstumpf
      @ABaumstumpf 6 років тому

      i think that might very well be true. Having a cheap inflatable plastic tube certainly will be a lot cheaper than having precise mirrors.
      It will also reduce the efficiency a bit, but that doesn't matter all that much.
      The big downsides will be reliability and longevity - this will take a serious beating in rough weather and if a tube gets punctured its over.

    • @baneblackguard584
      @baneblackguard584 6 років тому

      no he said it was smarter tech, not new tech.

    • @gary.richardson
      @gary.richardson 6 років тому

      Glass has high energy costs to manufacture and is a slower process that also add cost to scaling up.
      A plastic film at the right mil thickness and formulation will have a better cost benefit ratio.
      And, last long enough. I have seen 10 year greenhouse plastic that changed my mind about which way I want to go. A lot of people get rid of their cars in less than 10 years.
      The concern is how much must they sell and at what price point per year to stay in business.

  • @mazzamquanta3962
    @mazzamquanta3962 6 років тому +1

    I think base on size this version is better since solar concentration technology that uses flat parabolic mirror really eat up space. probably maintenance cost can be cut down. an innovative way of thinking. I amazed

  • @shelbyseelbach9568
    @shelbyseelbach9568 6 років тому +1

    You don't have to turn the sun's power into energy. That's why it's called power, it's already energy.

  • @choongzhenyang9724
    @choongzhenyang9724 6 років тому

    Can someone explain how it work?

  • @tmckmusic8584
    @tmckmusic8584 3 роки тому

    This must be how the gosun solar oven works.😊

  • @kestane313
    @kestane313 6 років тому +2

    I sent an email to company, called many times but nobody replies. I searched information on internet and i found that 26 people are working in the company. They need a Secretary!!! The guy in the video says that 55 percent cheaper, soooo how much 1 Mw system costs? Even in the website no detailed info.

    • @gary.richardson
      @gary.richardson 6 років тому

      One of their staff did reply in the comments here.

  • @JoeBlac
    @JoeBlac 6 років тому

    Is there a chance the track could bend?

  • @Bryanboi100
    @Bryanboi100 6 років тому

    Why not use this as a hyperloop as well??

  • @NotN8
    @NotN8 6 років тому

    Don't they have something similar in the Arizona desert that concentrate sunlight to run Sterling engine generators?

    • @lylestavast7652
      @lylestavast7652 3 роки тому +1

      I don't think there's a commercial grade concentrated solar to Stirling engine system in the US, but could be wrong. Solana is maybe the plant you're talking about in AZ - it's rows of parabolic troughs, not sure how they're converting it at the generation - it is a molten salt solution type medium. ( There have been test installations of parabolic dish with a Stirling engine at the focus in test beds near Los Alamos NM before though.)

  • @Doppekidd88
    @Doppekidd88 3 роки тому

    Now make this a motor for a vehicle and you could reach speed of light since magnifying light makes it even hotter and thus making the motor power faster as it heats up sounds crazy I know

  • @globalko
    @globalko 6 років тому +211

    Can't wait for Thunderfoots video debunking this shit

    • @judgeomega
      @judgeomega 6 років тому +59

      what is to debunk? it almost certainly will work. its just a matter of cost efficiency... which is largely dependent on scale of manufacture.

    • @AtlasReburdened
      @AtlasReburdened 6 років тому +11

      Yeah, it's effectively identical to a concentrated solar tower set up with one caveat that could be good or bad depending on how you look at it, and that is that with a tower you can easily get temperatures an order of magnitude over what this can do. High temperature difference is great if you're driving a large heat engine as efficiency is largely affected by that, but it presents a number of engineering challenges that require specialty material and experience for technicians. This may be disadvantageous compared to this horizontal design when it comes to driving things like small steam turbines, as you need to dump enormous amounts of energy into water to phase transition it and more still to superheat it, and this may be easier in the long run with a design that allows the energy to input over a longer time scale and without the temp extremes. I can't speak to how much efficiency will be gained by enclosing the array, but this is a design that obviously works because you can currently find hundreds of acres of similar but open parabolic trough collectors all over I-10 between Arizona and Texas.

    • @jacobwaltz4941
      @jacobwaltz4941 6 років тому +2

      im ready for this man

    • @AtlasReburdened
      @AtlasReburdened 6 років тому +7

      Sidowse You've never heard of evaporative cooling?

    • @habiks
      @habiks 6 років тому +5

      Why would he? This thing is not new.. they already have similar stuff in usa desert.

  • @Gruntled346
    @Gruntled346 6 років тому

    they've been doing this for years if I'm not mistaken...

    • @pauljames1682
      @pauljames1682 6 років тому

      CSP has been around for thermal, the trick is not to heat the PV.

  • @pdoubleyou7801
    @pdoubleyou7801 6 років тому

    oh the negative comments. its an innovation! the mirror surface needs to be a parabola. these guys have cleverly enclosed the flexible mirror surface inside a round cylinder so that by turning the cylinder it efficiently deforms the mirror into a parabola at optimal angles to the sun. they have made an age old concept better more efficient AND 55% cheaper that current mirror focusing systems (or so they say)
    perhaps the neg comment posters should re-watch and wonder why non of us thought of this first and rushed to the patent office.

  • @SolarizeYourLife
    @SolarizeYourLife 6 років тому +2

    For most the video you're only seeing a partially made trough of mirrors without any mirrors.,..

    • @rncd999
      @rncd999 6 років тому

      It was a weird choice of editing, since we submitted different types of footage of the plan. As long as it gets the point across, I guess :)

    • @gary.richardson
      @gary.richardson 6 років тому

      It did cause a lot of confusion and misunderstandings and I even had to admit mistakes in my postings.

    • @rncd999
      @rncd999 6 років тому

      I think the wanted to show the whole cycle from construction to the finish product but the editing didn't communicate it well.

  • @brinkshows2720
    @brinkshows2720 6 років тому +28

    this already excists for decades in a way cheaper way.

    • @richardwicks4190
      @richardwicks4190 4 роки тому +4

      Yep, I remember in the 70's they were using molten salt as the liquid to heat, and use the heat to run generators at night. This has been around for ages. Seems like a lot of these technologies are just green energy scams to me.

  • @gunplow
    @gunplow 6 років тому

    Make a thermal wind chimney

  • @hermitoldguy6312
    @hermitoldguy6312 6 років тому

    I wonder how many "misleading text" reports UA-cam is ignoring.

  • @jeffchilds8050
    @jeffchilds8050 6 років тому

    Sandia Labs had a parabolic trough back in the early 1970's.

  • @worldpeace1822
    @worldpeace1822 6 років тому

    So funny that the reporter is able to explain that thing better than the sales rep or engineer...

  • @ytSuns26
    @ytSuns26 6 років тому +16

    The interviewer seems completely out o f her comfort zone!

  • @d.romero3014
    @d.romero3014 6 років тому +11

    "A new way"?, are you kidding me?.

  • @adon2424
    @adon2424 6 років тому +13

    Too much emphasis on logistics, not enough substance on the theory of operation.

    • @kazedcat
      @kazedcat 6 років тому +1

      Adon Lando this is just a concentrated solar the innovation is that it is using cheaper materials. They don't need to talk about the theory because it is old tech.

    • @adon2424
      @adon2424 6 років тому

      kazedcat TM , they said "a new way" in the title, not an old way.

    • @kazedcat
      @kazedcat 6 років тому

      Adon Lando the title is clickbait. Watch the video he said it is an old tech done in a smart way.

    • @adon2424
      @adon2424 6 років тому +1

      kazedcat TM , of course it is. Any form of deception I take with a grain of salt.

    • @gary.richardson
      @gary.richardson 6 років тому +1

      Not enough emphasis on cost benefit and use benefit. Not enough visual detail in those two respects. I guess theory of operation would include how to put it to use advantageously, I'll give you that.

  • @altha-rf1et
    @altha-rf1et 6 років тому

    could get the panels of from about 20 of them big screen TV that everybody is throwing out and do the same

  • @Elliandr
    @Elliandr 6 років тому

    Looks like this might solve the dead bird problem solar has.

  • @scottbros6368
    @scottbros6368 6 років тому

    Where are the measured results from the prototype?

  • @fish9468
    @fish9468 6 років тому +55

    this is just a version of those towers surrounded by mirrors that cook birds all the time- just with much more wasted surrounding material- driving up the costs.

    • @MsSomeonenew
      @MsSomeonenew 6 років тому +8

      Those cook birds on occasion, killing far less then a tall glass building does in a year.
      And I don't see how this is any more material then one of those giant systems, only question is efficiency.

    • @fish9468
      @fish9468 6 років тому +2

      MsSomeonenew look at all the surrounding material for one panel!

    • @atruebrit6452
      @atruebrit6452 6 років тому +4

      useless tech that has so many drawbacks that nobody will use it. ever.
      i wonder if this is yet another investment scam, or is it just lack of common sense.

    • @Elliandr
      @Elliandr 6 років тому

      The bird issue is still a serious one. A single plant kills around 1000 birds a year, and the reason is because the light attracts bugs which in turn attracts birds. The issue for solar is that they can't build along protected bird migratory paths unless they can guarantee not to kill the protected birds in doing so.

    • @nandoanalog
      @nandoanalog 6 років тому +3

      Mcdonalds kills more chickens in a day, than all the solar plants toghether in a year.

  • @gunplow
    @gunplow 6 років тому

    Sun heats chimney cause ing chimney to spin, cool air enters in at bottom below ground level heating by sun (magnified) turn hot air out with venture effect spinning chimney like wind turbine

  • @hardikpatel3709
    @hardikpatel3709 6 років тому

    Good

  • @rodrickau
    @rodrickau 6 років тому

    Goes without saying that something a lot lot smaller could suddenly turn up.

  • @schlix101
    @schlix101 6 років тому

    Reality is that you need direct sunlight to gain HEAT from it. I.e. with some clouds around, the HEAT from the light is also negligible. While it is proven that with conventional solar panels you can still obtain some electricity on a cloudy day as there is still enough light (photons) passing through the clouds.

  • @danmyself5341
    @danmyself5341 6 років тому

    cost per watt???

  • @abram730
    @abram730 6 років тому

    A multi staged system that could also desalinate ocean water would let deserts be terraformed into farmland, while generating electricity in the process.

  • @warbluedragon
    @warbluedragon 6 років тому +1

    Keeping heat down means no more birds catching ablaze

  • @כולנוביחד
    @כולנוביחד 3 роки тому

    There Is No Shortage of Energy; There Is Shortage of Normalcy
    Despite increased production of energy from renewable sources, and despite the slowdown in car manufacturing, oil prices are skyrocketing. Even though fewer power plants still burn coal, coal prices are skyrocketing, as well. Natural gas prices, too, are going through the roof, and energy demand seems to outpace supply in every country and in every form of energy. Have Earth’s energy sources dwindled so drastically in a matter of months? The answer is a resounding “No!” There is no shortage of energy; there is a serious shortage of normalcy in human relations. I hope the current crisis will put some sense into humanity’s insane consumption.
    The energy crunch indicates that we are over consuming. We are producing too much, throwing the excess production to the trash, polluting the ground, the air, and the water, and then we are complaining that we do not have enough. It is about as sane as killing one’s parents and then pleading for the court’s mercy because I’ve recently been orphaned.
    It is time we reconsider everything we produce-how we divide production, profits, and goods, which services are necessary and which are redundant, and most importantly, how we treat one another. The goal of this process should be clear to everyone: survival.
    There is no ulterior motive, no attempt to dominate or deprive anyone of power or wealth. It is simply that reality is forcing us to take all of humanity and the entire planet into consideration. If we don’t, our entire civilization will collapse like a deck of cards.
    Since we still do not understand it and insist on running things the way we have always been running them-through power games-I anticipate a very cold and gloomy winter for the northern hemisphere. The energy crunch will leave many in dark and cold houses; there will be no gas for cars, and renewable energy will not replace traditional sources since there will be little sun during the winter. I hope that at least, it will make us rethink our values. If it doesn’t, next summer will be even worse than the awful summer that just ended.
    I know that many people are counting on the promise of renewable energy to solve the energy problems of humanity. I think they are mistaken. There is plenty of energy, far more than we really need. We could cut emissions by at least half tomorrow. But the more we have, the hungrier we become, so our thirst for energy will never be satiated, and we will never stop exploiting the planet or each other until we reeducate ourselves and start being humane toward each other.
    We have been behaving like spoiled brats whose parents buy them whatever they want. Now, our parents have run out of money and our childhood is over. It is time for us to mature and conduct ourselves like responsible adults, caring for all of humanity the way a mother cares for her entire family. If we think like a family, we will achieve normalcy.

  • @michaelmuturi12
    @michaelmuturi12 6 років тому

    yes...we can use giant magnifying glass to heat steel, how genius of you

    • @rncd999
      @rncd999 6 років тому +1

      Hi Michael, I said pre-heat ;)

  • @constantinosschinas4503
    @constantinosschinas4503 6 років тому +1

    looks a bit weird to me. no technical data, just marketing. how much watt, in what conditions, how much is lost in conversion, per year estimate, simple stuff.

    • @baneblackguard584
      @baneblackguard584 6 років тому

      agreed, not enough information about the specific product. but that's par for the course with quickie news blurbs looking for a couple minutes of something they think will pique peoples interest. the technology is old, legit, and works. it just trades more area for lower cost.

  • @scottmccluremcclure3916
    @scottmccluremcclure3916 6 років тому +23

    Cnbc this is old tech and your just Clickbaiting us

    • @peoplsrepublcOcali
      @peoplsrepublcOcali 6 років тому

      Not clickbait, just evidence of media intelligence.

    • @gary.richardson
      @gary.richardson 6 років тому

      It is new in cost of manufacture.

    • @trex283
      @trex283 5 років тому

      @@gary.richardson really ? How so...

    • @gary.richardson
      @gary.richardson 5 років тому +1

      @@trex283 it has been 8 months since I posted this. The video here was terrible and I got more insight when I visited their website and seen their other videos.
      From what I recall, it was how they were able to substitute glass with plastic to bring capital costs down 55% according to the spokesperson in the video.
      In my learning about plastics engineering as a side interest, I took time to follow advantages and disadvantages with plastics versus other materials.
      Glass is obviously more expensive but more durable. While plastics are not as durable but require less energy and time to manufacture.
      Glass would seem like the better choice but issues arise with atmospheric erosion. Such as, existing problems of mirror replacement due to desert sand slowly scratching the mirror surface and causing the need to maintain optical quality by either polishing or replacement.
      You will need to double check but what I remember, the glass was facing replacement too frequently.
      A few years back, someone compared glass with polished aluminum and managed to bring costs down below glass (even with polishing).
      Now, plastics are usually less performing than aluminum but sometimes the performance costs justify the use of plastic instead.
      For instance, I work as a marine electrician for more than 15 years now and in one of the yards I work in, I service flood lights used by our sandblasters. The costs to replace glass lenses became cost prohibitive. So we came up with a clever way of utilizing multiple thin films that quickly peel away without my assistance. And we switched from high impact, scratch resistant glass to regular plexiglass with added poly films without any noticeable loss in illumination. As a result, we significantly reduced our service call hours and material costs to save our company money.
      Likewise, a Solar Trough Farm owner can save significant coin on their startup and even add more troughs with the savings made.
      And can save even more with buying their own add-on layers in bulk and sized to fit between frames just right.

    • @trex283
      @trex283 5 років тому

      @@gary.richardson thanks for your response! I'm going to build an off grid home in a colder climate so I am looking for affordable solar solutions.

  • @outernetspace8634
    @outernetspace8634 6 років тому

    I hope. When Tesla is living today.. He totally do a most high tech. Electricity.. Does not need a wire. Just a frequency.

  • @omganso
    @omganso 6 років тому

    I dont get why everybody is saying this is not new technology he said in the video this is old technology.