Aisha & The Shia - عائشة والشيعة

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 36

  • @almu2min
    @almu2min 2 роки тому +2

    OMG bro, i'm trying to rewrite all the lyrics to translate it in different languages and post it to reach the most people possible. 2 hours for 8 minutes of video. What a great job you make to translate it in arabic !

  • @supebrain
    @supebrain 11 років тому +9

    great speach and for the comments below.... the fact that these two women decided to be on the side fighting against Ali (as) shows that they didnt embrace islam and that they where on the side of evil. as muhammad (as) says "Ali (as) is from me and i am from Ali(as)" & "Ali (as) is the truth". just blows the whole argument out of the window

  • @AA-fi7sl
    @AA-fi7sl 3 роки тому +4

    So why didn’t the prophet divorce then wives like Allah commanded him to if they do not repent??

  • @mahdialhilfi200
    @mahdialhilfi200 11 років тому +10

    this says it all perfect speech

  • @UmarAlFarooq
    @UmarAlFarooq 4 роки тому +7

    2012 Syed Ammar has fire in his eyes. 2020, no more fire. I miss the old Syed.

  • @uuoo4105
    @uuoo4105 4 роки тому +1

    جزاك الله خيرا حيث استبصر الكثير من المسلمين السنه عند سماعهم لمحاضراتك

  • @buhazeem.alsuwaidi
    @buhazeem.alsuwaidi 3 роки тому +10

    This guy has refuted himself multiple times without realizing.
    He said just because you’re a prophet doesn’t necessarily make your wives & descendants righteous ,
    Because allah mentioned by name / or specific references that they are disbelievers.
    He dug his grave himself,
    If that’s the case that allah mentions other inferior prophets than Mohammed pbuh that their wives clear cut are disbelievers,
    As an intellectual logical consistent being , what’s more probable? Allah forgot to mention specifically the disbelievers wives of our most beloved prophet that is crucial to believe and follow him as the last messenger to be a Muslim or he didn’t cause he they didn’t disbelieve ?
    Secondly , Surat al noor , allah revealed 25 verses about Aisha to exonerate her from the slander of fornication.
    ( How ironic , your god who’s all knowing what’s in the heart and future defended this woman .. who are you to oppose ? )
    Thirdly, you just said just because you’re a prophet doesn’t make your children good & righteous like Noah? Then how about being consistent with that cause your whole mythical belief is based upon imamah by descendants!
    .. ( How hypocritical, i feel sorry for the lay people who have little knowledge get brain washed by this hypocrite clown. )
    ( Wallahi , if you use your intellect, you will see everything i stated makes sense , don’t let him pour all this black hatred to the point if blind faith. )
    Lastly , apart of allah telling you she’s your mother for those who believe , yes you can’t marry or anything to them , but then again allah could have easily says it is not allowed to marry them , but allah has a wisdom and the beautiful linguists of his speech To show you their worth.
    I saved the best for last ; this verse dismantles the whole Shia religion , ironically it’s their only and most used verse to justify their belief , once you read it in it’s full context not just decontextualize it and super impose your own interpretation; it manifests like you pulled the trigger of your own gun thinking it’s where you facing but it’s facing towards you. Verse ahl al bayt , becomes unambiguous clear cut allah was talking about all the wives of the prophets are in fact ahl al bat ( yes all ; including Aisha , Hafsa , um habeeba ,for those who suffer from cognitive dissonance, allah wasn’t too lazy or forgot to include exceptions ). Then hadith al kesaa the prophet included ali fatma Hasan and Hussain , we believe it’s authentic.
    After you show them the verse in full context they will try to desperately clutch on straws, like one said when the prophet died , Ali went and divorced aisha from him .. wait, what? Huh , I thought wives of the prophet no one can interfere in his marriage? Double standards fallacy ?
    It’s too sad once they realize Aisha was referred to clearly multiple times in the Quran while none , not even Ali pbuh nor abu Bakr not ONE of your Imams mentioned by name but only reference to Ali pbuh is in the verses of al all of muhajreen and ansar that they’re promised paradise from allah. The reason they never once used this verse which is the only reference to Ali because they have to tale the full package from al muhajreen and ansar which are the Sahaba and Omar and Abu Bakr and Othman ... Subhan allah , they leave out this only real referred verse of Ali and they go interpret al teen w al zaytoon as Hassan and al hussain and Ali is Malik yom al deen w 3leem bthat el 9door.
    May allah guide all Shia brothers and sisters to the truth. 🙏

    • @Replawyer
      @Replawyer 2 роки тому +3

      Bro you are really nice 👍👍no one can answer you because you apply such a truthfull and nice comment on this video😌😌

    • @mahirtalebsoderportgymnasi5160
      @mahirtalebsoderportgymnasi5160 Рік тому

      Boy you funny as heck🤣🤣🤣 I didn't read everything but you said "it's too sad once they realize Aisha was refered to clearly multiple times in the Quran while none of your imams are mentioned by name" ok, where is Aisha named by name then? If you ask where are my imams mentioned, where is Aisha mentioned? And why are you bringing up your beliefs and your tafasir of ibn abbas, tafsir Salem Sebelan, tafsir ikrima, tafsir Abu musa Al ash'ary, all the men that Aisha taught in her house 😂😂 and it's in bukhari and Muslim, once you read those two you'd know what a fahisha Aisha actually is. So don't say "not even Ali is mentioned" from where are you talking? From your tafasir or my tafasir? In my tafasir, the imams AS have said Surat Al hajjar verse 41 does in fact mention "Ali" by name "This is the straight path of Ali". So don't bring up your beliefs against us, you understand that buddy. Don't bring the tafasir of men that ejaculated and got breastfed by Aisha in her house (muslim 288a) (muslim 1455). I can sit here and destroy your whole religion from top to bottom only from your books. I can destroy Aisha only from your books.

    • @mahirtalebsoderportgymnasi5160
      @mahirtalebsoderportgymnasi5160 Рік тому

      The prophet gave Ali AS the ability to divorce the women that went against him. Isn't that kind of obvious? But nah with y'all sunnis, everything gotta be super specific cuz y'all got a brain of a fish. Who went to war against Ali AS? In the battle of Jamal. I think you know very well, but just trying to hide it. The prophet said "no one loves you but a believer and no one hates you expect a hypocrite". Aisha is a hypocrite, there you go.

    • @mahirtalebsoderportgymnasi5160
      @mahirtalebsoderportgymnasi5160 Рік тому

      The prophet mentioned "Ahlul Bayt" for the people under the blanket. Um Salama came and asked if she could join, and it's in musnad Ahmad, and the prophet said no you're on good. Meaning she's not a member of the Ahlul Bayt, nor is any of the prophets wives. And don't even mention Aisha and Hafsa they're long gone, they got divorced by the lion of Allah before the battle of Jamal 😂😂😂 they're nowhere to be found

    • @mahirtalebsoderportgymnasi5160
      @mahirtalebsoderportgymnasi5160 Рік тому

      Nowhere in surat Al noor does it mention Aisha. Stop playing yourself

  • @almu2min
    @almu2min 4 роки тому

    Thanks for the translation !

  • @ربيعالقلوب-ح6ه
    @ربيعالقلوب-ح6ه 4 роки тому

    حفظك الله وسدد خطاك

  • @mohammedaliyu7964
    @mohammedaliyu7964 4 роки тому +1

    Very good sermon

  • @AA-qf5hy
    @AA-qf5hy 4 роки тому

    كون كل المسلمين مثل هذا السيد ما تفكر بل تفرقه الله يحفظك يا سيد عمار

  • @kumeilbandali
    @kumeilbandali 5 років тому +2

    This is the TRUTH!!!

  • @londonlife7401
    @londonlife7401 2 роки тому

    Ur too good sayed ammar mashallah

  • @AA-fi7sl
    @AA-fi7sl 3 роки тому

    If the wives were so bad and didn’t repent then why did Prophet not divorce them?? Any Shia can answer this question please?

    • @Replawyer
      @Replawyer 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah bro you are right i also ask them but no one answer me because a lawyer can't answer properly😂🤣

    • @carlbee1882
      @carlbee1882 Рік тому

      For the very obvious reason, divorce doesn't become a sunnah amongst Muslims

  • @dailyhindustan5843
    @dailyhindustan5843 5 років тому

    Beautiful

  • @1nonlyMissy
    @1nonlyMissy 11 років тому

    But he provides Surah Tahrim to warn them and guide them and repentance is accepted cos no one is perfect other than Prophet(saw). If every time I made a mistake in my relationship I was told we should get divorced and that I will be damned to hell for making a mistake then what is the purpose of repentance.

    • @ghalibahmed6676
      @ghalibahmed6676 5 років тому +4

      1nonlyMissy being married to a prophet is different from being married to any other human being. You are saying that the status your relationship with your husband in the eyes of Allah is the same as Aisha’s relationship with the prophet

    • @marv1sta
      @marv1sta 4 роки тому +3

      she never repented, show me a hadith that proves she repented and was forgiven, when being cursed from 7 heavens above surely the prophet would've updated us on the matter but nothing, no repentance, instead she made things worse by declaring war of jamal,

  • @1nonlyMissy
    @1nonlyMissy 11 років тому +1

    When you love someone, you want to help them, you want to guide them to the right path, you want them to join you in Jannah. No one is perfect, everybody makes mistakes, so don't punish them for the mistakes, guide them and help them, cos if you punish them then there would be such a high divorce rate with all the issues that arise in marraige.

  • @العريني-ق5ي
    @العريني-ق5ي 3 роки тому

    انزل الله براءة ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها في كتاب الله تعالى يتلى إلى يوم القيامة واضحة ولكن لازال الشيعة يطعنون في ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها رغم ان كتاب الله حذر من الطعن في زوجات النبي وتوعدهم يوم القيامة قال تعالى: ﴿ وَأَزْوَاجُهُ أُمَّهَاتُهُمْ ۗ وَأُولُو الْأَرْحَامِ بَعْضُهُمْ أَوْلَىٰ بِبَعْضٍ ﴾.
    ولكن لازال الشيعة يحاولون الطعن مرارا وتكرارا فيها.
    فمن كتب الشيعة ما يثبت ان النبي كان يحب ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها رضي الله عنها.
    وقد حاول الشيعة القاء الشبه في ام المؤمنين عائشة ومنها الشبهة التي يرددها الشيعة أمثال ياسر الحبيب والقريشي عن ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها عائشة.
    ونص هذه الشبهة هي:
    رجل اسمه عبد الله ابن شهاب صحيح مسلم. كتاب الطهارة. باب حكم المنى وَحَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ جَوَّاسٍ الْحَنَفِيُّ أَبُو عَاصِمٍ حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو الْأَحْوَصِ عَنْ شَبِيبِ بْنِ غَرْقَدَةَ عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ شِهَابٍ الْخَوْلَانِيِّ قَالَ كُنْتُ نَازِلًا عَلَى عَائِشَةَ فَاحْتَلَمْتُ فِي ثَوْبَيَّ فَغَمَسْتُهُمَا فِي الْمَاءِ فَرَأَتْنِي جَارِيَةٌ لِعَائِشَةَ فَأَخْبَرَتْهَا فَبَعَثَتْ إِلَيَّ عَائِشَةُ فَقَالَتْ مَا حَمَلَكَ عَلَى مَا صَنَعْتَ بِثَوْبَيْكَ قَالَ قُلْتُ رَأَيْتُ مَا يَرَى النَّائِمُ فِي مَنَامِهِ قَالَتْ هَلْ رَأَيْتَ فِيهِمَا شَيْئًا قُلْتُ لَا قَالَتْ فَلَوْ رَأَيْتَ شَيْئًا غَسَلْتَهُ لَقَدْ رَأَيْتُنِي وَإِنِّي لَأَحُكُّهُ مِنْ ثَوْبِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يَابِسًا بِظُفُرِي.
    الرد على هذه الشبهة:
    اولًا:
    نجد في الرواية (فأرسل وارسلت فبعثت فرأتني الجارية. فأخبرت ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها ).....
    والسؤال الذي يطرح نفسه؟
    هل لو هذا الرجل ينام في غرفة ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها رضي الله عنها فهل يوجد داعي لترسل له ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها جارية لتحدثه.
    هل يوجد داعي ان يكون الكلام بصيغة (فأرسل وارسلت فبعثت فرأتني الجارية. فأخبرت ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها ).
    فهل القول بانه نزل ضيفا على ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها عائشة فهل شرطا ان يكون نزل في نفس غرفة ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها رضي الله عنها.
    كان من عادة العرب انه إذا نزل شخصا ضيفا عليهم ليس شرطا ان يسكن في نفس البيت الذي يسكنون فيه وممكن يسكن بيتا اخر يملكه مخصص للضيافة وهكذا...
    وهذا ما حدث ان هذا الشخص الذي نزل ضيفا بأم المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها عائشة بدليل قول الحديث الذي يستدل به الشيعة بصيغة (فأرسل وارسلت فبعثت فرأتني الجارية. فأخبرت ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها ) فلو كان بنفس البيت الذي توجد به ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها عائشة لما كانت الحاجة لأرسال الجارية لأنه في نفس غرفتها -حسب زعم الشيعة -
    الامر الاخر:
    ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها عائشة مكلفة بتبيان حكم شرعي وحكم فقهي لهذا الرجل الذي يجهل هذا الحكم الفقهي وهو - اذا احتلم ماذا عليه ان يفعل- فأم المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها مكلفه بتعليم حكم فقهي يجهله هذا الشخص ليعلمه لأشخاص اخرين.
    ثم ان ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها لم تلتقي بهذا الشخص بدليل وجود وسيط وهي الجارية حسب الرواية السابقة التي تقول (فأرسل وارسلت فبعثت فرأتني الجارية. فأخبرت ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها ).
    وهذا يعني انه كان يسال الجارية عن حكم شرعي يجهله ثم تخبر ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها بهذا الامر فتقوم ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها عائشة بالرد على هذا الحكم الشرعي للجارية التي تذهب الى الرجل وترد على هذا الحكم فهذا يعني بحكم الرواية انها لم تراه.

  • @haydarturki4483
    @haydarturki4483 4 роки тому +1

    كل همهم ليس الدين بل ابتعاد الشيعه عن السياسه والحكم الدنيوي. هولاء سنة ابو بكر وعمر وعثمان حمالي الخطايا

  • @yerhere1233
    @yerhere1233 4 роки тому +1

    Sorry to bust your bubble but "Hawwa" is not mentioned in the Holy Quran as you have mentiined. That's the danger of being half- baked "scholar".