It's an okay gun. It's good for fighting multiple enemies at mid-range because it has a 26 bullet mag. But the low rof and bad recoil are big drawbacks, and it's almost useless in close range. I just use it to make the video less repetitive
@@10ebr1s What's interesting is that, for a long time, that was the best medic weapon in bf1. The medic class got crappy guns in bf1... that's why a lot of people thought the medic class in bfv was op cuz the SMGs are so good
I met a similar name like ZJG, in game a month prior watching this video. I reported two persons for cheating. He and his friend, I think, were cheating and it was obvious, he was wallhacking and the other was redeploying the server, it was so freaking annoying. I screen record the game and gave it to EA but no response (guessed it right), then I stopped playing BF V ever since and for good. All I can say if I bring this to court justice is: The EA AntiCheat system has been criticized as ineffective and inadequate. It is imperative that Electronic Arts (EA) reevaluates its entire approach to anti-cheat measures. Additionally, players often feel compelled to make microtransactions in order to engage with or compete against cheaters.
I haven't played any EA games that have an effective anti-cheat system, and I don't think EA will reevaluate its anti-cheat system since it's expensive to do that and cheaters aren't hurting their bottom line to the point where they need to take action. I don't know if you know about Apex Legends, but it is full of cheaters. And cheater literally give pro players aimbot and wall hack on LAN. I never had hope for EA's anti-cheat. I'm just frustrated that the community already has a good enough anti-cheat system, but EA fucked that system up by updating a useless anti-cheat for BF V. I don't know why players are compelled to make microtransactions in order to compete with cheaters. Microtransactions usually give you cosmetics or, at best, some advantages, but none of that can compete against aimbot or wall hack
It's this phenomenon: www.reddit.com/r/BattlefieldV/comments/12ve144/can_someone_please_explain_the_whole_server/ If the hacker is a bitch, he does that to capture the objective and turn the game into a capture flag simulator, and the game usually ends in 5-10 minutes. If he's not a bitch, he does that to take a tank or plane or to prevent a player on the opposite team from playing tank or plane, usually because that player is too good
Wow 👌
❤❤❤
How do you like the gun you used in this video compared to the higher rof DMRs?
It's an okay gun. It's good for fighting multiple enemies at mid-range because it has a 26 bullet mag. But the low rof and bad recoil are big drawbacks, and it's almost useless in close range. I just use it to make the video less repetitive
@@10ebr1s What's interesting is that, for a long time, that was the best medic weapon in bf1. The medic class got crappy guns in bf1... that's why a lot of people thought the medic class in bfv was op cuz the SMGs are so good
Yeah, Dice makes some weird choices with bf 1
Why did the game adjust your score from 33 kills at 18:51 to 0 kills at 20:06?
I don't know, it might have been a bug
Did anyone else catch the Easter egg at 3:45? It totally blew my mind!
No, what was it?
Did you comment on the wrong video ?
I met a similar name like ZJG, in game a month prior watching this video. I reported two persons for cheating. He and his friend, I think, were cheating and it was obvious, he was wallhacking and the other was redeploying the server, it was so freaking annoying. I screen record the game and gave it to EA but no response (guessed it right), then I stopped playing BF V ever since and for good. All I can say if I bring this to court justice is: The EA AntiCheat system has been criticized as ineffective and inadequate. It is imperative that Electronic Arts (EA) reevaluates its entire approach to anti-cheat measures. Additionally, players often feel compelled to make microtransactions in order to engage with or compete against cheaters.
I haven't played any EA games that have an effective anti-cheat system, and I don't think EA will reevaluate its anti-cheat system since it's expensive to do that and cheaters aren't hurting their bottom line to the point where they need to take action. I don't know if you know about Apex Legends, but it is full of cheaters. And cheater literally give pro players aimbot and wall hack on LAN. I never had hope for EA's anti-cheat. I'm just frustrated that the community already has a good enough anti-cheat system, but EA fucked that system up by updating a useless anti-cheat for BF V.
I don't know why players are compelled to make microtransactions in order to compete with cheaters. Microtransactions usually give you cosmetics or, at best, some advantages, but none of that can compete against aimbot or wall hack
What does it mean "redeploying the server"?
It's this phenomenon: www.reddit.com/r/BattlefieldV/comments/12ve144/can_someone_please_explain_the_whole_server/
If the hacker is a bitch, he does that to capture the objective and turn the game into a capture flag simulator, and the game usually ends in 5-10 minutes. If he's not a bitch, he does that to take a tank or plane or to prevent a player on the opposite team from playing tank or plane, usually because that player is too good
Ah yes.... I've seen that in other videos. Not the whole server part, but when a guy is a really good tanker. Tks