Federal Air Traffic Controller on Radical UAP Movement

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 кві 2024
  • UA-cam member Brian Arbenz recently viewed my Albert M. Chop video on the 1952 Washington DC UFO Flap.
    As you can see from his J Edgar Hoover comment, he was amused by the language used to report the UAP event, specifically one word uttered by me. A link to the full original video is in the text description... but here is an extract of what I stated in that video followed immediately by evidence of what respected Civil Aeronautics Administration Air Route Traffic Controller Harry G. Barnes WROTE for the newspapers in Late July of 1952.
    In this article from the Alexandria Daily Town Talk, and all other coverage of the story... you can see that Barnes was the one using the term RADICAL to describe the UFO movements compared to those of ordinary aircraft. Not I and not any cub reporter, because Barnes has the byline.
    Now with that said and with Gary Seven looking down on humans in disgust, there is a high probability that Barnes use of the word radical was puppeteered.
    UFO movements are radical to reflect a radical UAP Movement and luddite human resistance to Disclosure.
    #uapdisclosure #tomowensuap #ufo #uap #ufoflap #washington #flap #easyrider #radical #erratic #alchop #glory #dennishopper #harrybarnes #ednugent #disclosure #garyseven #primitive #luddite
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13

  • @daffidavit
    @daffidavit Місяць тому +2

    I can't get over Dennis Hopper's description of what he saw. I saw something very similar and I wasn't stoned.

    • @TomOwensUAP
      @TomOwensUAP  Місяць тому +2

      Yup. Same here. This was, perhaps, the only way to get this content into the cultural literacy without ridicule. Jack Nicholson's dead pan matter-of-fact delivery that follows was also pretty amazing.

  • @brianarbenz1329
    @brianarbenz1329 Місяць тому +3

    I'm happy to be corrected. I should have respected your judgment. No hard feelings, I hope. I did not intend my comment to be abrasive, but I should have been more respectful in tone.

    • @TomOwensUAP
      @TomOwensUAP  Місяць тому +4

      We're good... I think challenges are important and with yours you've helped point out another symbolic connection similar to James Bond being assigned to eliminate free radicals in Never Say Never Again.

    • @brianarbenz1329
      @brianarbenz1329 Місяць тому +3

      @@TomOwensUAP "Radical" has so many uses, most of them superficial, like the term "radical dudes" I recall with gritting teeth being used on Circuit City ads in the '90s to get people to keep buying products for their mindless amusement, the precise opposite of what being a radical really means.

    • @TomOwensUAP
      @TomOwensUAP  Місяць тому +3

      @@brianarbenz1329 yes yes! And of course some characters will bandy the word radical against others using the word reactionary to try to discredit or undermine their debate opponents and political opposition. I really do respect your attention to detail because that is, after all, what this UAP channel is all about. Thank you for quality communication.

  • @daffidavit
    @daffidavit Місяць тому +2

    Tom have you ever done, or seen a video on how the Raytheon wing camera is described by a Raytheon employee? I've heard that the white "field" around the UFO is a normal side effect of the camera. I've also seen IR videos of F-16s where the same artifact has occured. That would be an interesting video if one exists. If anybody can find it, you can. Dave

    • @TomOwensUAP
      @TomOwensUAP  Місяць тому +1

      David, back soon to write more on this.

    • @TomOwensUAP
      @TomOwensUAP  Місяць тому

      David, I've been swamped with a home-related project... just now coming up for air. Will look at this soon. Any luck on confirming the Vespasian Titus link to Whose son is the Messiah?

    • @daffidavit
      @daffidavit Місяць тому

      Not yet Tom. This is something I'll have to look into. Like you, I have to pick and choose what to look at next. Take your time on my questions, they are unimportant, just fun things to ponder. Let me see what I can come up with on your quiz. I'll try to get back if I can find a reasonable answer. Take care, talk soon. @@TomOwensUAP

    • @daffidavit
      @daffidavit Місяць тому +1

      This is the best I can find until I eat something to get my blood suger up, lol: From Wikipedia:
      Caesar's Messiah is a 2005 book by Joseph Atwill that argues that the New Testament Gospels were written by a group of individuals connected to the Flavian family of Roman emperors: Vespasian, Titus and Domitian. The authors were mainly Flavius Josephus, Berenice, and Tiberius Julius Alexander,[1] with contributions from Pliny the Elder.[2] Although Vespasian and Titus had defeated Jewish nationalist Zealots in the First Jewish-Roman War of 70 AD, the emperors wanted to control the spread of Judaism and moderate its political virulence and continuing militancy against Rome. Christianity, a pacifist and pro-Roman authority religion, was their solution.@@TomOwensUAP

    • @TomOwensUAP
      @TomOwensUAP  Місяць тому

      David, yes... in part. Joe Atwill's open statements on this issue back in the relatively recent year of 2005 are supported with evidence from within the New Testament and far earlier scriptural texts from religions and traditions that predate Christianity and were assimilated into it. Chapter 1 of the Roman-backed Evangelion of Matthew goes out of its way to emulate the earlier Zoroastrian and Sumerian/Babylonian genealogy requirements for priesthood. It works to demonstrate that through a matrilineal line, Jesus is a descendant of David... aka son of David.
      However, Mark 12 then has Jesus himself turn the tables to suggest that the Messiah will not be a Son of David... hinting that it is Titus son of Vespasian who returns with angels in the form of Roman Legions to bring judgement upon the zealot rebels and scribes who, in their minds, twisted ancient literature. The vatcinium ex eventu of this is readily apparent in multiple places in the NT.
      That and the various astronomical Aramaic and Greek Language puns with Orion and a John the Baptist version of Aquarius suggests Jesus of Nazareth as a literary assimilation device for all the Earth's ancient history, science religions and traditions. A Reader's Digest if you will for humans too busy surviving in a difficult world to read and understand all of the ancient history.
      To this point, if you look at Paul Thigpen's recent book on Extraterrestrial Intelligence and the Catholic Faith, you will find this understanding reflected in the little to no references to Jesus of Nazareth and a focus instead on a Grand Architect Higher Power and aliens and/or angels as ultimate servants of that higher power. Also in Thigpen's book you will find the ET references to ancient Greek scientists or philosophers, just as I have stated that Jesus the light of the world and Paul the Ophiuchan Snake Handler echo those same scientists and philosophers: Pythagoras, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Anaxagoras, Democritus, Theophrastus, Aristarchus, et.al. The NT is like the sauce Prego, my respected Italian brother, "It's in there."
      Now, although I've made this non-fundamentalist declaration and maintain that you can find Jesuits also aware of this evidence, I still appreciate my Catholic (meaning UNIVERSAL) tradition experience that was augmented with clues provided by the Freemason-controlled state education system. The seeds that were sown very simply through the NT and various forms of Catechism, even when humans within the RCC system failed personally, easily take root and grow in any quality soil.
      As always, as part of digging for the truth in this embryonic state of Disclosure, I am open to cross examination and will provide reams of supporting evidence for any claim I make here in the interest of a better world.