This isn't armoured enough or large enough to replace the Bradley. A Namer or Puma type is much more likely. This is more for replacement of less armoured M113 types.
Brabble Master The Bradley is unsatisfactory as is. 90% of the time it does M113's job (for which it is overarmored) while 10% of the time doing a light tanks job (for which it is under gunned). Every Bradley can be replaced by buying nine PMMC G5 for every one M8 Buford. The entire IFV concept as invented by USSR only works with the Soviet overemphasis for light maneuverable armor doing high risk, low reward missions.
what? where? I agree about the Bradley. it is outdated for today, but the likely replacement would be a larger, heavy armed vehicle like the CV90, Puma, or Namer type. This vehicle would work for M113 replacement. But the US already has a vehicle for that called the AMPV, based off the Bradley hull. Personally I think the tracked Styker offered more potential but also more risk.
give me a pre owned or used FFG & watch how I can make the FFG more capable by as much as 3 fold in terms of sheer performance, protection & reliability!!! I'll get rid of the rotating turret for sure because even better fire power can be achieved with a simple remote weapons station, so why the extra weight!!! fit it with a GAU-12 Equalizer & Spike LR . . . but real amazing bit ain't just the fire power, rather it's the armour & it's superior mobility that'll be unmatched by any!!! and no I'm not kidding!!!
great to see
Great driver visibility! M113 needed a update, I hope Bradley gets shitcanned in favor of this.
As far as I know it is based on the Bradley.
This isn't armoured enough or large enough to replace the Bradley. A Namer or Puma type is much more likely. This is more for replacement of less armoured M113 types.
Brabble Master The Bradley is unsatisfactory as is. 90% of the time it does M113's job (for which it is overarmored) while 10% of the time doing a light tanks job (for which it is under gunned). Every Bradley can be replaced by buying nine PMMC G5 for every one M8 Buford. The entire IFV concept as invented by USSR only works with the Soviet overemphasis for light maneuverable armor doing high risk, low reward missions.
It is about 25 tons.
what? where? I agree about the Bradley. it is outdated for today, but the likely replacement would be a larger, heavy armed vehicle like the CV90, Puma, or Namer type. This vehicle would work for M113 replacement. But the US already has a vehicle for that called the AMPV, based off the Bradley hull. Personally I think the tracked Styker offered more potential but also more risk.
Gostei dessas esteiras
love the woman with the neck pillow those are standard issue on china apc's
If it's not got political friends or a good lobby it'll get no-where.
Rubber tracks have less friction/resistance? Hard to believe. Why not just use 6 wheels?
give me a pre owned or used FFG & watch how I can make the FFG more capable by as much as 3 fold in terms of sheer performance, protection & reliability!!! I'll get rid of the rotating turret for sure because even better fire power can be achieved with a simple remote weapons station, so why the extra weight!!! fit it with a GAU-12 Equalizer & Spike LR . . . but real amazing bit ain't just the fire power, rather it's the armour & it's superior mobility that'll be unmatched by any!!! and no I'm not kidding!!!