An absolutely horrific situation for the people of Pakistan. This just solidifies the strength of people with money, and I tell people that Pakistan is the best country only if you're rich.
@@jasha9sandhu I don't think it's the law that is wrong, but the way it's being implemented. Deeyat in an accident that has uncontrollable variables is ok (Such as the car brakes failed and someone died. Such out of court settlements are very common throughout the world) . But for intentional murder, deeyat should not be an option to put on the table.
Engineer Mohammad Ali already gave a very good answer how state should be involved in this case. You are saying the same thing. Now I have no confussion. Thanks Shehzad bhai ❤
There was an infamous case in saudi where there was a accident killing if i can revise , where victim family didn't pardon after offering millions of money and so many kabilaah were there but victim family didn't pardon and then state took the matter into their hand, was only possible when there was no money,power or pressure involved and there are many cases where Diyat is accepted without any pressure.
Shukar hai Pakistan mai aap jaisai log bhi hain who r speaking truth.i m fed up of hypocrisy of ppl who r using islam for their own benefits. Allah innsai pochai ga.
Diyat is halal and has been practiced under Islamic Sharia since the birth of Islam, the law is directly derived from Quran. What do you mean by taking advantage as if it's not originally meant to give advantage to the murderer? What else was it meant to achieve?
@@Sasta_Charas_Mat_Piyo u can offer deeyat..its victim's family choice to accept it or not..can't pressurise the victim family with your money n power
@@sariaasghar1226 So if victim's family is greedy or extremely poor with no other option than to voluntarily accept the diyat money, is it justice for the innocent victim who was brutally murdered? Is it justice for that entitled rich murderer? Is it good for a society as a whole, to let such murderers roam free without any fear of consequences? It's laws like these that help rich landlords dominate/threaten poor people & spread corruption. Moreover, how can you as an outsider know for sure whether the family was pressurized or not? This inhumane law has done nothing except for enabling injustice, exploitation of the poor at the hand of rich and corruption of society ever since it was created.
Just recently we saw how Chief Justice of Supreme Court stepped back 😢on his decision due to much pressure from assemblies, mullah, religious parties, and their followers 😢😢😢what not and what not😮😮
The concept of diyat does exist in Islam. However, the state has the responsibility to set a fixed amount of diyat. The amount should be sufficiently high so as to avoid situations like this whereby the wealthy can buy freedom for a fraction of their net worth.
If this kind of accident has happened in USA, victims family would have got a lot of money from insurance and court decision. At the same time, they would have prosecuted Natasha. Deeyat is such a dumb law
It so recently that theft in us is increasing , before it was not the case but such a case if it reached the courts in us definitely the victim would have got money also mad the murderer would be punished also not like Islamic shariah which enables rich people to pay for murder
The most interesting fact is that the family has denied any financial transaction and said they have pardoned Natasha on the name of Allah( and no money was received.... really????...)My question is that who gives family the right to pardon the criminal, and where does the "State" stands here if family has the right to pardon or prosecute???😮😮
i am sorry budy i am angry too, but islamic laws give me this right of course they are lying they have took money behined the scene sham on them but i don't know man i am just sad.
some of the people in india don't know the incident held by akash ambani in december 2013 where he killed a person by his car but the whole news was wiped out from the media and no party opened by any party later on driver of ambani accepted it and driver got convicted.
There were multiple crimes with multiple victims. The diyat is only for the deaths of the father and daughter. She should be charged with other crimes including but not limted to: Drug use, drug possession, speeding, reckless driving, property damage, assault, etc. she should not be roaming free.
yep but she's rich and its Pakistan so basic common sense does not apply. It is sad that 200 million people have to be deprived of basic necessities so the 1% can live comfortably for generations. Such a hopeless country.
Drug use is not a crime. Possession and distribution is. Speeding is a traffic ticket, reckless driving is jail time. Depending on how reckless it was what what it caused. Property damage is a fine too. Assault is bailable but imprisonable crime.
ok so what about other charges like hitting people , driving while intoxicated , she should answer to the state because diyat is just a compensation for murder , sadly it can be used as a do what you want token
7:04 yes , absolutely correct 👍 Instead of going through the lingering process of the judicial system that will take years and cause financial hardship and mental agony , they preferred to take the most logical route . Our Sympathies for the victim's family .
Simple is that State should interfere in the process to prevent the culprit from getting away without any charges. Natasha not only killed two persons but also created terror in the society.
Good video. I’m surprised and pleasantly so, because I was told this guy is an unreasonable liberal. So imagine me watching this video to the end and agreeing 95% with everything you pointed out, Shahzad. I think a bit more fair presentation of the facts would have included a clear disclaimer to tie everything up neatly and make clear whether the family was forced to take the money or not is completely unknown
No way to know if the family was forced. People who speak conclusively like that and pretend they have sources are liars. One can only assume they were forced considering the circumstances.
Paksitani yeh chij KO koi darr ke ek bi Islam ki mutabik chalne wahle insaan hai toh batao jara naam Ka islamic country naam Ka RAKHA hai... corruption,lutera,Chor , bhikmangne wahle international bhikari pakistani hai ...umra karne ke naam pe visa leta hai lekin professional bhik mange jana hai kaha Islam hai🤷🤷
@@mohammadbinahmed1813 How is this case misusing diyat law? 1. She paid more than the prescribed amount in the light of the Quran and Hadees. 2. Murder was accident/unintentional. 3. The victim's family accepts the money. All conditions are fulfilled, how is it being misused? It may sound unfair but it's not un-Islamic. It's completely halal.
*I am not liberal but 💯 percent apki yeh wali baat sahi hen ke Pakistan mai adha teetar adha bateir hen oper se police, judiciary aur system ki Waja se ghareeb ke paas capacity nahi hoti*
If i was a mufti or whatever who had a say on islamic law i would have given all the properties and thee companies owned/run by the perpetrator to the victim's family so that the "Islamic law" would have some consequences for the perpetrator
@@Sasta_Charas_Mat_Piyoif it was your family member killed in accident by Natasha/elite class then how would you responded? May Allah’s curse on the people misusing Islam for their convenience. It’s a shameful act and should be condemned.
@@fouziaandleeb9986 I also find this law to be inhumane and extremely unfair. But it's not un-Islamic, it's completely halal as it's directly derived from Quran (Surah Nisah) so stop accusing people of misusing Islam. This is exactly what this law has been enabling, to let rich get away with the most heinous crime by just paying diyat, ever since this law came into existence. And it's not the only law that's inhumane, Islamic Sharia is filled with such laws.
Pakistan should never worry. Pakistan is a nazriati mulq like Israel, formed during the holy month, and Waahid Islamic nuclear power of the world. Pakistan’s problems are caused by saazish of yahood o hanood o nissara though China is a trusted friend. Pakistan is also a leader of the Muslim ummah and provides security to them all over the world.
If court is given authority to whether or not they can further pursue regardless of victims family call, then what on earth ensures that the judge will not be bribed ? Because then it will be no longer about the lawyers debate and solely based on judge’s decision. Through away tribal laws develop and implement new law and let them keep evolving
for my understanding, Diyat law is good bcz it gives both parties a chance to move on in their lives bajaye iske keh saalon saal jail mein reh kr zindagi barbad kre,sarkar pr bojh rhe etc agr isey istemal kia gya ho as it is mentioned in islamic jurisprudence for unintentional accidents, lekin power,pressure etc involve ho to make diyat as a deal then state should enter into this and i think kisi bhi parhe likhe aalim ko dikkat nhi honi chahiye as uh mention to add some more to Diyat law. mujhe galati Diyat law mein nhi powerful logon ke beimaani mein nazar aa rhi as they can use their power or money to manipulate the law.
Absolute rubbish. "Out of court settlement" is only for minor compoundable offenses in India. Not for accidents or any non compoundable offense. Don't mislead and spread misinformation just because you are ignorant in your zeal to act same2same.
@@RohitSharma-oh8qmIs the Porsche case the only hit-and-run case in India? Or is it the only case you ignorant buffoons know about? BTW the case is still subjudice. Anything else?
Agr power, paisa ho to president se bhi maafi mil Jaye and I think bohat sare democratic country mein presidential pardon system hai including pak,ind,USA etc 😂 & any system can work for uh if you've power and money till uh don't Die 😂 😢
And there is nothing more uglier than the people who are blaming the victim’s family. They should have some empathy to see the tremendous pressure family goes through before forgiving the criminal.
*15:53** se leykar **2:26** tak joh baat kahi hen aapney 💯 percent yahi problem hen, patah he nahi chalta kuch system ki Wajah se aur kuch laws ki Waja se*
Great video.... although i think the diyyat law is what it is and is not flawed.... the victim's heirs are the ones who hold the power to forgive as per Islam. BUT the suggestion given in the video is absolutely spot on... The "free will" has to be ensured by courts. The heirs have to be protected. And definitely a clause, as suggested, to shield against cases where there is any doubt of pressurizing victim's heirs needing extra protection from judge against diyyat, is the best solution to bolster the ISLAMIC DIYYAT LAW. It will remain Islamic, and be more protected from getting abused by elite.
16:50 yes , THIS is the whole point of this case NOT about religion . This is about the ability of the Judiciary and the State to provide protection to common people so that they can participate in the judicial process in free fair and transparent manner
Islam mein "ijtihad" ka concept boht important hai jiska mtlb hai ke Islam aesa deen hai Jo fix nhi yai ta qayamat rehnay wala deen hai to ismai kuch kanoon aur kuch baatein aesi hai jismein Ijtihad kr saktai mtlb reasoning aur kayas krkai change krsaktai kanoon. E.g diyat.
Tomorrow marks the 50th anniversary since Ahmadis were re-defined under the Constitution as non-Ahmadis. Do a video on state sponsored persecution of Ahmadis that has transpired since, if possible. Have an Ahmadi perspective on.
He is Not Only to be Blamed , Country is Formed On Weak Bases and Makers Only Made it to Maintain their Fuedal Domination ,It was never about Islam…..When People will accept that then everything will be solved…❤❤
@@KhattaMeethaOficial True, as i read about Jinnah its apparent that he had no plan for what to do with Pakistan and how it is going to run so basically from the start it was a shit show
*This is what happens when People living in GREEN-fields say Punjabi, blindly or in fear Converts & accepts traditions of Far desert, tribal Arabs,* -now to show as Islamic, practicing all injustice on *Deeyat, Blasphemy, zakat, shariat, halal etc.* -now allowing interference of *Arab/Sheiks in Political matters, Judiciary, Economy etc.* -now blindly celebrating their *festival traditions, wearing their cloths, learning Arabic etc* -now naming kid as *akram chakram, hareeem kareem arabic names as if Arab will give them kherat* At the End, *Punjabi got crushed into arabian Supremacy, though creator gave them Greenfields and Arab a Dry Desert.*
@@NumerophileNerd so basically u are saying islamic judiciary does not use avidance and proof for justice. lagta hai dimaag me khoob gobar bhara pada hai aapke.
The fact we don't have any muftis or ulemas raising voice on this issue is baffling! In Pakistan, they're in the driver's seat - from small town mosques to big businesses and ultimately, state. Murderers using Islamic rulings to suit their agenda and they're silent? Without the right context, in this case, matter of blood money - more Raymond Davis, Shahrukh Jatoi, and Natasha Danish will prevail. Where is the law of the land? Weren't courts supposed to dispense trial and fair play? It's not ONLY the failure of justice system but our clergy too.
Faisal bhai these laws will never change because DIYAT law is actually a rich person law and Faisal Bhai Diyat law is against the poor and should be removed but NOBODY will dare to challenge these laws.
I'll be very honest with you. People take it to court, only when both parties match in status. In this case, there was no match and honestly the victim family knew that the case would be dragged for years and in the end, they will either pull out or case will be in Natasha's favor. Due to this, they ramped up the pressure on her family, and left with a good deal. I used to get upset at this keh "yeh body per sauda ker laingay" but now I understand why this happens. Sad and unfortunate state of justice in Pakistan. With that money, at least, the family will be able to sustain itself for some years, till their other kids become the mother's support.
Wait, this is actually a thing? Even if the victim's family forgives, shouldn't the state be a party for the case against the perpetrator? What if a person was not well liked by his family and they conspired with someone to have the victim killed? If that's the case, then do both the conspirators and perpetrators go free just because some money changed hands?
And those who are making fun of any principle of Islam in real making fun of Islam and they even not studied it why it is, and what is, the reason or logic behind it and don't rely on listening,learn Arabic and principles which are essential to understand Islam
All the basic principles in the Islam are sacred and holy and it is till the doomsday because these are not made by men it is from god because everything that is from holy prophet is from god, although this principle was first practiced by prophet's (S.A.W) grandfather Abdul muttalib and was also by the god on him as it has a story behind it and prophet (S.A.W) also continued it, therefore it is applicable now and in future as well.
@@MohsinMasood-kh3nf No problem brother. Keep practicing them but dont call others Islamophobe when they do not want age old laws in modern societies. On personal level and in islamic countries, you can practice whatever you feel like. No problem with that.
So what should we call them😂😂? it's like if someone is a thief he say don't call me thief. If someone doesn't like Islam and create propaganda is islamophobe because he is.There is no law for the one on the personal level whatever you do personally good or bad it will be asked on the day of judgement but if it effects the society or other than you mentally, ideologically ,physically and etc if it will be even your personal deed than judiciary will come into play
@@MohsinMasood-kh3nfwhy is the Quran so kafirophobic ? Why does the Quran call non Muslims as filthy worst of creatures and najass? Jizyah is meant to be paid in subjugation . The Quran is an evil ideology which is harmful to society humanity , first where is the existence of your god ?
For the love of listening to you for the last two years dear Shehzad i have this conclusion that until Pakistan becomes a secular republic and remains an Islamic one, your beloved country will mot progress one inch further.
In Islam, diyat allows for mercy and reconciliation, but it does not override justice. If the crime endangers public safety or involves negligence, the state can still intervene and enforce legal punishments. The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) emphasized that while the victim's family can accept diyat, justice and public safety remain paramount (Sahih al-Bukhari). Thus, even when diyat is paid, the law can still hold offenders accountable to protect society.
A poor family will definety be merciful and reconcile in majority of the cases humans are greedy when they are getting a lot of money as diyat Islamic law is meant to be misused
Unless you can not challenge the core of issue from which all these evil originates and try to find solution within the boundary of that evil, you will go in circles. Hope one day some one can make a film like Life of Bryan and is not lynched.
This is why Dr Israr rejected to be a part of Islamic Shariar Council, he knew that establishment only want to have this to exploit the lslamic laws. This council should either have ultimate power or should not exist. Natasha case is one of many reasons where we need unified islamic law system.
Unfortunately, Islam is interpreted in a very different way in Pakistan. In the rest of the Muslim world, discussing religious issues are highly encouraged. However, in our country talking about religion is considered to be the sole prerogative of the clerics. This leads to a situation where religion remains essentially inaccessible to the common man and the cleric can give whatever interpretation they please. No hope for Pakistan.
Amazing analysis! The difference in power and social stature between the two parties is obvious but I guess the obvious is oblivious to our Qanoon and powers at large. Bhaijaan eik ghustakhi maaf likin Violation nahi Volition meri jaan.
It is not a surprise in Pakistan. As Sir Taimur Rehman stated, due to the class structures of Pakistan, diyat has become a tool for rich to scot-free.
ISLAMISM is the complete antithesis of humanism.
You must be anti Islamic
@@jasha9sandhuactually these laws are not Islamic. These are twisted rules installed by dictator Zia ul Haq.
This law has always been for well off’s few
@safdarhanif2167 if you can’t express, don’t confuse people with your comments
An absolutely horrific situation for the people of Pakistan. This just solidifies the strength of people with money, and I tell people that Pakistan is the best country only if you're rich.
I agree
Bura na mano Islami hai 😂😂
@@jasha9sandhu I don't think it's the law that is wrong, but the way it's being implemented. Deeyat in an accident that has uncontrollable variables is ok (Such as the car brakes failed and someone died. Such out of court settlements are very common throughout the world) . But for intentional murder, deeyat should not be an option to put on the table.
@@jasha9sandhu misuse of something doesn't mean that thing itself is wrong
@@360pgaming2sorry but law is wrong😂
Whenever there is a crime, it's not Victim vs Criminal, it's always The State vs Criminal.
what if state itself is criminal or that both are criminals?
Accident doesn't came in Criminal charges... As regard to road accident
Engineer Mohammad Ali already gave a very good answer how state should be involved in this case.
You are saying the same thing. Now I have no confussion. Thanks Shehzad bhai ❤
❤️
Lekin wo qisas e usman ke khilaf hai
Qisas e Usman hua qn nhi wo uske khilaf hai @@cadence764
@@cadence764Qisase Usman by a mob. Yes every Civil Society is against this
@@ThePakistanExperienceSorry to say but:
🇵🇰🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
🇵🇰🩴🩴🩴🩴🩴🩴🩴🩴
There was an infamous case in saudi where there was a accident killing if i can revise , where victim family didn't pardon after offering millions of money and so many kabilaah were there but victim family didn't pardon and then state took the matter into their hand, was only possible when there was no money,power or pressure involved and there are many cases where Diyat is accepted without any pressure.
Respect you for having the guts to call a spade a spade!!!👏👏
🙌
Shukar hai Pakistan mai aap jaisai log bhi hain who r speaking truth.i m fed up of hypocrisy of ppl who r using islam for their own benefits. Allah innsai pochai ga.
Diyat is halal and has been practiced under Islamic Sharia since the birth of Islam, the law is directly derived from Quran. What do you mean by taking advantage as if it's not originally meant to give advantage to the murderer? What else was it meant to achieve?
@@Sasta_Charas_Mat_Piyo u can offer deeyat..its victim's family choice to accept it or not..can't pressurise the victim family with your money n power
@@sariaasghar1226 So if victim's family is greedy or extremely poor with no other option than to voluntarily accept the diyat money, is it justice for the innocent victim who was brutally murdered?
Is it justice for that entitled rich murderer? Is it good for a society as a whole, to let such murderers roam free without any fear of consequences? It's laws like these that help rich landlords dominate/threaten poor people & spread corruption.
Moreover, how can you as an outsider know for sure whether the family was pressurized or not?
This inhumane law has done nothing except for enabling injustice, exploitation of the poor at the hand of rich and corruption of society ever since it was created.
@@Sasta_Charas_Mat_PiyoWe know that because in the case of Shahrukh jatoi the family of the victim was pressurized.
@@Sasta_Charas_Mat_PiyoAnd we don't know about your family but no family would forgive the murderer of their loved ones.
Blasphemy = Death Penalty
(Because we have strict laws 😡)
Double m u r d e r = Small Fine
(Because we are forgiving too 😇)
Offended by everything
ashamed of nothing
Now you understand the grace of Islam 😇
ISS mei Islam ke Galti Nahi hai USS KO galat na kaho idhar Muslims galat Hain Jin ne Apne law Bana deye aage
Truth is there has never been a death penalty to anyone in Pakistan for blasphemy by court.
@usamaahmed6188 because they got the death penalty before reaching court 😇
مسئلہ اٹھاؤ نیچے ضیاء ملے گا😂
The best and true part
Yes
Tum Kitne Zia maaro ge har Ghar se Zia nikle ga.
Pakistan is actually a Banana republic or even worse. Hats off to you Shehzad for standing up with ethics and principles! May Allah protect you!
❤️
Just recently we saw how Chief Justice of Supreme Court stepped back 😢on his decision due to much pressure from assemblies, mullah, religious parties, and their followers 😢😢😢what not and what not😮😮
The concept of diyat does exist in Islam. However, the state has the responsibility to set a fixed amount of diyat. The amount should be sufficiently high so as to avoid situations like this whereby the wealthy can buy freedom for a fraction of their net worth.
If this kind of accident has happened in USA, victims family would have got a lot of money from insurance and court decision. At the same time, they would have prosecuted Natasha. Deeyat is such a dumb law
😂US me 1000$ ki chiz chori karoto chori ki koi saja nahi.
phr wahan har koi chori nhe krta zara socho@@Xhero9519
It so recently that theft in us is increasing , before it was not the case but such a case if it reached the courts in us definitely the victim would have got money also mad the murderer would be punished also not like Islamic shariah which enables rich people to pay for murder
Deeyat law = Hijda law
The most interesting fact is that the family has denied any financial transaction and said they have pardoned Natasha on the name of Allah( and no money was received.... really????...)My question is that who gives family the right to pardon the criminal, and where does the "State" stands here if family has the right to pardon or prosecute???😮😮
That’s what Natasha’s lawyers said too
5 crore
Like he said, people are in place to grease the system at a price. So you make it happen!
i am sorry budy i am angry too, but islamic laws give me this right of course they are lying they have took money behined the scene sham on them but i don't know man i am just sad.
Paisa dedo Allah bhi maan jayaga
some of the people in india don't know the incident held by akash ambani in december 2013 where he killed a person by his car but the whole news was wiped out from the media and no party opened by any party later on driver of ambani accepted it and driver got convicted.
There were multiple crimes with multiple victims. The diyat is only for the deaths of the father and daughter. She should be charged with other crimes including but not limted to: Drug use, drug possession, speeding, reckless driving, property damage, assault, etc. she should not be roaming free.
yep but she's rich and its Pakistan so basic common sense does not apply. It is sad that 200 million people have to be deprived of basic necessities so the 1% can live comfortably for generations. Such a hopeless country.
Drug use is not a crime. Possession and distribution is. Speeding is a traffic ticket, reckless driving is jail time. Depending on how reckless it was what what it caused. Property damage is a fine too. Assault is bailable but imprisonable crime.
ok so what about other charges like hitting people , driving while intoxicated , she should answer to the state because diyat is just a compensation for murder , sadly it can be used as a do what you want token
Ameer ka Deeyat, Gareeb ka Mayyat...👍🏻.
7:04 yes , absolutely correct 👍
Instead of going through the lingering process of the judicial system that will take years and cause financial hardship and mental agony , they preferred to take the most logical route .
Our Sympathies for the victim's family .
Don't question. The decision is halal according to Pakistani law. 😂😂😂😂
Simple is that State should interfere in the process to prevent the culprit from getting away without any charges. Natasha not only killed two persons but also created terror in the society.
Good video. I’m surprised and pleasantly so, because I was told this guy is an unreasonable liberal. So imagine me watching this video to the end and agreeing 95% with everything you pointed out, Shahzad. I think a bit more fair presentation of the facts would have included a clear disclaimer to tie everything up neatly and make clear whether the family was forced to take the money or not is completely unknown
No way to know if the family was forced. People who speak conclusively like that and pretend they have sources are liars.
One can only assume they were forced considering the circumstances.
@@ThePakistanExperience Speculate. Not assume.
Please don’t forget the case of Kashmala Tariq’s son who killed 4 young men in drunk driving accident.
5x the speed limit, impossible acceleration of a 3 tonne jeep and they call it negligence.
No one on earth can change laws and principles of Aasmani Kitaab.
Yes, until Islam becomes irrelevant.
yes, tell this to the ones abusing these laws and principles
Paksitani yeh chij KO koi darr ke ek bi Islam ki mutabik chalne wahle insaan hai toh batao jara naam Ka islamic country naam Ka RAKHA hai... corruption,lutera,Chor , bhikmangne wahle international bhikari pakistani hai ...umra karne ke naam pe visa leta hai lekin professional bhik mange jana hai kaha Islam hai🤷🤷
@@mohammadbinahmed1813needs self introspection
@@mohammadbinahmed1813 How is this case misusing diyat law?
1. She paid more than the prescribed amount in the light of the Quran and Hadees.
2. Murder was accident/unintentional.
3. The victim's family accepts the money.
All conditions are fulfilled, how is it being misused? It may sound unfair but it's not un-Islamic. It's completely halal.
Why does the state not do a case on her for endangering pakistani citizens ? This is a sad day
I am an Indian. And he is the only Pakistani I genuinely like. Because he speaks the truth no matter what
Shahzad u r doing a great service to nation . Rather than harbouring in theories u r spitting practical truths .
🙌
15:53 to 2:26 💯 percent agree 👍. Yeh baat
ME as INDIAN WAS ABOUT TO SAY- THEN U SAID KI INDIA SE COMMENT AAYEGA,
KI ISLAM LAW IS PROBLEM
Aap ko Kyu har jaga hate and propaganda create Karna hai jaake moumita mam ke liye justice demand karo India world ka rape capital bangya hai.
Really respect for you for being brave and speaking the truth.
Yrr keya acha analysis hai. Sun k dil khush hua atleast koi to iss aspect se bhi chezon ko dekh rha. Maza hi aa gya. Khush raho yar ❤❤
❤️
Shehzad your frustration was ZALKING😂 in the intro 😅😅
What a analysis Bro 😊 earned my respect again
🙌
Agreed every word you said
Really need to revisit few laws so that no one use such laws for their own good
In Pak anyone with money can get away with murder of a poor person😢. Just pay the poor relatives and all is forgotten
I was waiting for your video 😊
🙌
Hence proved Pakistan is a Banana republic!!🤣
It only proved that Pakistan is an Islamic republic.
*I am not liberal but 💯 percent apki yeh wali baat sahi hen ke Pakistan mai adha teetar adha bateir hen oper se police, judiciary aur system ki Waja se ghareeb ke paas capacity nahi hoti*
If i was a mufti or whatever who had a say on islamic law i would have given all the properties and thee companies owned/run by the perpetrator to the victim's family so that the "Islamic law" would have some consequences for the perpetrator
It wouldn't matter if it was Islamic law, Western law or whatever. In South Asia if you are rich, you get away with murder.
She paid more then the amount instructed by Islamic law so this is completely halal. You can't pick and choose Islamic laws as per your convenience.
@@Sasta_Charas_Mat_Piyoreally?? She should be ashamed of killing two innocent people.
@@Sasta_Charas_Mat_Piyoif it was your family member killed in accident by Natasha/elite class then how would you responded? May Allah’s curse on the people misusing Islam for their convenience. It’s a shameful act and should be condemned.
@@fouziaandleeb9986 I also find this law to be inhumane and extremely unfair. But it's not un-Islamic, it's completely halal as it's directly derived from Quran (Surah Nisah) so stop accusing people of misusing Islam. This is exactly what this law has been enabling, to let rich get away with the most heinous crime by just paying diyat, ever since this law came into existence. And it's not the only law that's inhumane, Islamic Sharia is filled with such laws.
Pakistan should never worry. Pakistan is a nazriati mulq like Israel, formed during the holy month, and Waahid Islamic nuclear power of the world. Pakistan’s problems are caused by saazish of yahood o hanood o nissara though China is a trusted friend. Pakistan is also a leader of the Muslim ummah and provides security to them all over the world.
Pakistan studies ka nasha kr k aae ho bhaI???
Hahaha that's all so true
If court is given authority to whether or not they can further pursue regardless of victims family call, then what on earth ensures that the judge will not be bribed ? Because then it will be no longer about the lawyers debate and solely based on judge’s decision. Through away tribal laws develop and implement new law and let them keep evolving
Thank you Shehzad. This was insightful.
🙌
Bro you're real gem of Pakistan ❤
❤️
for my understanding, Diyat law is good bcz it gives both parties a chance to move on in their lives bajaye iske keh saalon saal jail mein reh kr zindagi barbad kre,sarkar pr bojh rhe etc agr isey istemal kia gya ho as it is mentioned in islamic jurisprudence for unintentional accidents, lekin power,pressure etc involve ho to make diyat as a deal then state should enter into this and i think kisi bhi parhe likhe aalim ko dikkat nhi honi chahiye as uh mention to add some more to Diyat law. mujhe galati Diyat law mein nhi powerful logon ke beimaani mein nazar aa rhi as they can use their power or money to manipulate the law.
This is called 'out of the court settlement ' in India. I have never seen anyone get punished for the Run and Hit case.
Not just India, this is a case everywhere. That's why I am not really thinking about this case . Poor victim families are always forced to settle .
Absolute rubbish. "Out of court settlement" is only for minor compoundable offenses in India. Not for accidents or any non compoundable offense. Don't mislead and spread misinformation just because you are ignorant in your zeal to act same2same.
@@robynns24 what happened to latest porshe case?
@@RohitSharma-oh8qmIs the Porsche case the only hit-and-run case in India? Or is it the only case you ignorant buffoons know about? BTW the case is still subjudice. Anything else?
@@RohitSharma-oh8qm The case is still subjudice
Very informative video for a common man who doesn't have much awareness about tactics used by rich elite in the name of islamic practice.
🙌
Welcome to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 🇵🇰 where both the Republic and Islam work for you if you are NOT a common man 😊
In India also powerful people somehow dodge laws and judiciary is very corrupt.. but Pakistan is just next level 😂😂😂
see thats the thing...my man just explained how Islam is being abused and abrogated yet you say this.
@@Sunnyside24 bilkul sahi pakde ho 😂
Agr power, paisa ho to president se bhi maafi mil Jaye and I think bohat sare democratic country mein presidential pardon system hai including pak,ind,USA etc 😂 & any system can work for uh if you've power and money till uh don't Die 😂 😢
Allah is kind to the rich ❤
I'm not surprised
Nobody is
Absolutely on point
It’s a crime against state, not against any individual . State must act against criminals.
The state should give protection to the victim's family so that they can take the decision with free will and no one could pressurize them.
And there is nothing more uglier than the people who are blaming the victim’s family. They should have some empathy to see the tremendous pressure family goes through before forgiving the criminal.
Yes
To exist in Pakistan outside DHA campus is a mistake
Assalam Wallikum!! love and respect from Bangladesh!!!!
❤️
Excellent video very informative, har joke ke peeche bhi sachaye. Agree with you on all points
🙌
Money does not only talk, it also silences.
Sir eagerly waiting to watch you and Sahil Adeem together again. Please aik or podcast karein unke saath awaam ki kafi confusions clear hon gi.
Never
Very insightful. Good recommendation
🙌
Good analysis. Pehli dafa ap ki podcast aek arsy baad achhi lgi... Keep it up
you looking so different with thoes hair(in a good way)😭😭
Very well explained bro❤
❤️
@@ThePakistanExperience ap Sach bol Rahe hu jis sey apkey life stake pe or yeh bhi Ak jahad h !!!
Violation = offense
Volition = Free will
*15:53** se leykar **2:26** tak joh baat kahi hen aapney 💯 percent yahi problem hen, patah he nahi chalta kuch system ki Wajah se aur kuch laws ki Waja se*
The whole 🇵🇰 as a country needs overhaul from judiciary to local government but who will do that? We need a Miracle 🙏
With money, anyone in pakistan can create their own state. such justice itself demands justice. We're in Shameful elite captured poor state.
Great video.... although i think the diyyat law is what it is and is not flawed.... the victim's heirs are the ones who hold the power to forgive as per Islam.
BUT the suggestion given in the video is absolutely spot on... The "free will" has to be ensured by courts. The heirs have to be protected. And definitely a clause, as suggested, to shield against cases where there is any doubt of pressurizing victim's heirs needing extra protection from judge against diyyat, is the best solution to bolster the ISLAMIC DIYYAT LAW. It will remain Islamic, and be more protected from getting abused by elite.
16:50 yes , THIS is the whole point of this case
NOT about religion .
This is about the ability of the Judiciary and the State to provide protection to common people so that they can participate in the judicial process in free fair and transparent manner
😂 NOT THE RELIGION? 😅 That process of pardoning exists for a reason.
yeah sir even in Nepal a media mogul's son who was drunk and got into accident
this news was not even shown in TV at that time
Guess it’s the same across South Asia
Islam mein "ijtihad" ka concept boht important hai jiska mtlb hai ke Islam aesa deen hai Jo fix nhi yai ta qayamat rehnay wala deen hai to ismai kuch kanoon aur kuch baatein aesi hai jismein Ijtihad kr saktai mtlb reasoning aur kayas krkai change krsaktai kanoon. E.g diyat.
Tomorrow marks the 50th anniversary since Ahmadis were re-defined under the Constitution as non-Ahmadis. Do a video on state sponsored persecution of Ahmadis that has transpired since, if possible. Have an Ahmadi perspective on.
Thanks to Zia's legacy 😢😢😢
Yes
He is Not Only to be Blamed , Country is Formed On Weak Bases and Makers Only Made it to Maintain their Fuedal Domination ,It was never about Islam…..When People will accept that then everything will be solved…❤❤
@@KhattaMeethaOficial True, as i read about Jinnah its apparent that he had no plan for what to do with Pakistan and how it is going to run so basically from the start it was a shit show
Thanks to Islam*
It's almost like he passed away soon after. Clown. @@shambea566
Very informative. Thanks.
🙌
Brillaint take brother
🙌
Only religion where you can never be a seeker of truth , you are just a believer. You can never question anything.
*This is what happens when People living in GREEN-fields say Punjabi, blindly or in fear Converts & accepts traditions of Far desert, tribal Arabs,*
-now to show as Islamic, practicing all injustice on *Deeyat, Blasphemy, zakat, shariat, halal etc.*
-now allowing interference of *Arab/Sheiks in Political matters, Judiciary, Economy etc.*
-now blindly celebrating their *festival traditions, wearing their cloths, learning Arabic etc*
-now naming kid as *akram chakram, hareeem kareem arabic names as if Arab will give them kherat*
At the End, *Punjabi got crushed into arabian Supremacy, though creator gave them Greenfields and Arab a Dry Desert.*
*Lol Sura-e-Bakra* *will now guide CONVERTs on Justice Matters, Pathetic*
and what your opinion on pune porsche crash case. coz there is no islamic shariya law in india.
@@nsd0121 Indian Law & court system will take its own course, it will not use religious books or opinion, it will use evidence and proof for justice
@@NumerophileNerdlol yeah Indian court will demand a sorry letter from the Porsche boy and let him go.😂
@@NumerophileNerd so basically u are saying islamic judiciary does not use avidance and proof for justice.
lagta hai dimaag me khoob gobar bhara pada hai aapke.
The fact we don't have any muftis or ulemas raising voice on this issue is baffling! In Pakistan, they're in the driver's seat - from small town mosques to big businesses and ultimately, state.
Murderers using Islamic rulings to suit their agenda and they're silent? Without the right context, in this case, matter of blood money - more Raymond Davis, Shahrukh Jatoi, and Natasha Danish will prevail.
Where is the law of the land? Weren't courts supposed to dispense trial and fair play? It's not ONLY the failure of justice system but our clergy too.
Faisal bhai these laws will never change because DIYAT law is actually a rich person law and Faisal Bhai Diyat law is against the poor and should be removed but NOBODY will dare to challenge these laws.
Ye Rule toh Mujhe Game of Throne se Inspired lagta hai😂😂
Don’t blame Latif Khosa as it’s his responsibility as a lawyer to represent his client. Don’t use politics in everything.
I'll be very honest with you. People take it to court, only when both parties match in status. In this case, there was no match and honestly the victim family knew that the case would be dragged for years and in the end, they will either pull out or case will be in Natasha's favor. Due to this, they ramped up the pressure on her family, and left with a good deal. I used to get upset at this keh "yeh body per sauda ker laingay" but now I understand why this happens. Sad and unfortunate state of justice in Pakistan. With that money, at least, the family will be able to sustain itself for some years, till their other kids become the mother's support.
fantastic job
🙌
Wait, this is actually a thing? Even if the victim's family forgives, shouldn't the state be a party for the case against the perpetrator?
What if a person was not well liked by his family and they conspired with someone to have the victim killed?
If that's the case, then do both the conspirators and perpetrators go free just because some money changed hands?
Yes they should
You can't criticise or disagree with an Islamic law.
@@ThePakistanExperience I guess people with a lot of inheritance to pass on should tread very carefully in Pakistan.
Salman Bhai be like yeh konsa sceam hai jo mujhe pata nahin😂😂
State really doesn't care about its people unfortunately, and hence the law is on a permanent holiday.
And those who are making fun of any principle of Islam in real making fun of Islam and they even not studied it why it is, and what is, the reason or logic behind it and don't rely on listening,learn Arabic and principles which are essential to understand Islam
Why should one? They were great laws and principles for 7th century and far desert. But it's 21st century, so live here not there.
All the basic principles in the Islam are sacred and holy and it is till the doomsday because these are not made by men it is from god because everything that is from holy prophet is from god, although this principle was first practiced by prophet's (S.A.W) grandfather Abdul muttalib and was also by the god on him as it has a story behind it and prophet (S.A.W) also continued it, therefore it is applicable now and in future as well.
@@MohsinMasood-kh3nf No problem brother. Keep practicing them but dont call others Islamophobe when they do not want age old laws in modern societies. On personal level and in islamic countries, you can practice whatever you feel like. No problem with that.
So what should we call them😂😂? it's like if someone is a thief he say don't call me thief. If someone doesn't like Islam and create propaganda is islamophobe because he is.There is no law for the one on the personal level whatever you do personally good or bad it will be asked on the day of judgement but if it effects the society or other than you mentally, ideologically ,physically and etc if it will be even your personal deed than judiciary will come into play
@@MohsinMasood-kh3nfwhy is the Quran so kafirophobic ? Why does the Quran call non Muslims as filthy worst of creatures and najass? Jizyah is meant to be paid in subjugation . The Quran is an evil ideology which is harmful to society humanity , first where is the existence of your god ?
I have different world view compare to you but man you always speak Sense and your takes on different issues are very logical!
🙌
Not a shock. That was expected 🙂↕️
Yes
true,, i was expecting that news to come out in few days 😀
For the love of listening to you for the last two years dear Shehzad i have this conclusion that until Pakistan becomes a secular republic and remains an Islamic one, your beloved country will mot progress one inch further.
While UK punished its richest family 5 to 10 years for just underpaying staff
Know that diyaat is not financial COMPENSATION aur damages but a pure punishment.
In Islam, diyat allows for mercy and reconciliation, but it does not override justice. If the crime endangers public safety or involves negligence, the state can still intervene and enforce legal punishments. The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) emphasized that while the victim's family can accept diyat, justice and public safety remain paramount (Sahih al-Bukhari). Thus, even when diyat is paid, the law can still hold offenders accountable to protect society.
Yes
This is What he is Saying , This Is Corrupt Decision…..
Islam is the problem.
Source
A poor family will definety be merciful and reconcile in majority of the cases humans are greedy when they are getting a lot of money as diyat Islamic law is meant to be misused
At this point one should take justice in one's hand.
Unless you can not challenge the core of issue from which all these evil originates and try to find solution within the boundary of that evil, you will go in circles. Hope one day some one can make a film like Life of Bryan and is not lynched.
Money is equal to free from low
This is why Dr Israr rejected to be a part of Islamic Shariar Council, he knew that establishment only want to have this to exploit the lslamic laws. This council should either have ultimate power or should not exist. Natasha case is one of many reasons where we need unified islamic law system.
So on point!!!
🙌
Unfortunately, Islam is interpreted in a very different way in Pakistan. In the rest of the Muslim world, discussing religious issues are highly encouraged. However, in our country talking about religion is considered to be the sole prerogative of the clerics. This leads to a situation where religion remains essentially inaccessible to the common man and the cleric can give whatever interpretation they please. No hope for Pakistan.
Amazing analysis! The difference in power and social stature between the two parties is obvious but I guess the obvious is oblivious to our Qanoon and powers at large. Bhaijaan eik ghustakhi maaf likin Violation nahi Volition meri jaan.
Bhai you are rock 😅