The irony of AN-225 was that it was built to carry Soviet space shuttle. Which went to space and landed in automatic mode without crew. Which means they did have the technology. Just that unlike capitalist carriers never had the incentive to get rid of extra people
Sino-Russian jets aren’t going to break into the exotic jets market because they aren’t established. Their current focus on A320 and A350 class planes are good; high volume middle of the market market where they can get a slice.
The thing that worried me the most was evacuation times. That lower deck would have been a real struggle just in boarding and disembarking and we have all seen how crazy people get once the plane has landed. Multiply that craziness with panicking idiots in a life or death situation and there are going to be a lot of casualties. If the aircraft was fitted for total economy class then I shudder to think of the casualty figures.
That's what worried you? I can see it, but I'll raise you a question: How many Russian made/designed civil aircraft types haven't crashed? I believe it's all of them at some point.
@@arlnodii "During its service life, the Tu-114 had only one fatal accident. On 17 February 1966, Aeroflot Flight 65 attempted to take off from Moscow" Wikipedia is your friend
I know its old, but its a really nice Design which united the nice design elements of A380 and 747 into 1 Plane, puts nice (Carrier) flighterjet like folding wings on it, and a stair which makes it possible to board without stairtrucks or skybridge. Even tough it should have more then once when it has soo many ppl onboard, for a fast and efficient Boardning and Deboarding.
Hello there Mr. Nick , I subscribed to you day before yesterday on the 13th of March 2021 and I have watched all your videos. I just finished watching the Russian A380/747 - the Super Jumbo Jet That Never Got Built. All the videos are so cool , nice animations. I wish that I had found this channel earlier. The Animations are fantastic. Waiting for more videos on other topics too.
because it's the same technology invented by russian inventor and Chief designer of An-124 and An-225 Viktor Tolmachev. Oleg Antonov called him PROFESSOR .
They default to open position, meaning you need hydraulic pressure to fold the wingtip. In the event of a hydraulic failure, the wingtip would simply be held in whatever position it was in.
I think it would have been better if the ends swiveled back instead of up. I can see how there would be structural issues with supporting a 15 meter+ extension on the end of a wing that was vertical.
well... it really started to develope in USSR, but than fall of USSR and new company Sukhoi decided to review that project. But u probably didn't know that Boeing together with Sukhoi developed a new plane - Sukhoi Superjet 100. So KR-860 lost. Now in russian aviation came to new concept - flying wing. So aviation technologies will go from "pipe with wings (sausage) " to " flying wing ". About concepts close to flying wing - make internet search for " Frigate Ecojet".
The A380 was actually originally conceived as a 1000 seat aircraft. Airbus then thought that was to big a leap in 1 go, so made it shorter. Lots of pics on Google showing the 'stretched' version.
This is a additional point which broke the neck of the 380 - The wings and the structure were still made for the 1000 passenger -900 version, the wings are too heavy and too big for the -800 and have a inferior aspect ratio because of the 80 m wingspan limit.
The cargo container and the train car would have never flown. That is straight up marketing department not consulting the engineers / designers. The weight from one of those containers and the train carriage would ruin their flight capacity. It's more economical to fly twice the cargo in lightweight containers, as the value of not having to do the transfer does not outweigh that capacity.
Made this with no microphone in a sharehouse in Indonesia! Don’t worry the next videos I made are much nicer I hope you watch them as well! And if your happy, subscribe!
Audio is incredibly bass heavy, I have F&E videos play all the time but this is the first aviation station video and I had to drop the balance from +5 bass to -6 bass to not blow the sub.
Boeing only uses it to maintain the current ICAO class of the 777 (the next class would be less flexible and cost more landing fees). Over 80 m they need it. The 380 should also have had such folding wings, they squeezed the wings to 79,80 m, but got a bad aspect ratio which costed fuel efficiency.
Few words about technologies used in this concept: 1. special cockpit. It's kind of same like on An-124 and An-225, but only 2 pilots needed. 2. twin front gear like An-124 and An-225. 3. internal wing structure like An-124. 4. folding wings like on Russian fighters. This technology will be used on the new An-124-300 aircraft ... or rather, on the new cargo plane SLON (elephant). probably will build under IL aviation manufacturer. All this technologies came from An-124 and An-225 Chief designer Viktor Tolmachev. He was a Great Man !
The Antonow An-225 also has a twin front gear like this design.
Same as the 124
It also carries and unloads shipping containers.
@Robert Hall No it hasn't. It has 4 wheels but they are mounted on one strud, not two like the An 124 and An 225.
Exactly. And just in case, somebody doubts it: ua-cam.com/video/gH6oKrhGGtQ/v-deo.html
Even the C-5M Galaxy Heavy Lifter
When a 747 and a A380 have a baby
Too bad it got aborted
Why hurt us this way
*shocked Pikachu face*
How would they do it?
omg i- **W H E E Z E**
3:17 did you really forget about the Antonov AN-225 that also has 2 axles at the front
It would require an entire flight deck filled with specialists to help fly the beast like in the An-225.
The irony of AN-225 was that it was built to carry Soviet space shuttle. Which went to space and landed in automatic mode without crew. Which means they did have the technology. Just that unlike capitalist carriers never had the incentive to get rid of extra people
@@jur4x it looks like the Antonov 124!
The last variant made me think of “getting high on your own supply” 😂
Is it just me or did anyone else had to decipher what's said by the bass vibration?
...same here..i saw slideshow only with some human like mumbling..
It's classified information - not to be disclosed.
I was gonna ask about that. Very deep sounds in this one.
I actually thought my audio system had broken down…
yeah, it sounds as if was mixed by Christopher Nolan
Fantastic, I had NO idea this plane was ever conceived! Thanks for this!
Very welcome! Its totally insane! I love the fact that it runs on its own cargo!
Can't wait for the remake of this video now that you've given us a sneak peek in the 200k milestone livestream! Wish you good work
Could you imagine if a natural gas carrier version experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly during an unplanned ground approach?
The crew would find they were made immediately redundant and retired from their role, with full conmerative honors
@@FoundAndExplained 😆
you need to mix the audio better... my krk vxt8 is bassing out almost
Yes these eariler videos didn't have proper gear or proper mixing. for some reason I was obsessed with maxing out the bass in my voice. Apologuise :)
@@FoundAndExplained same... I'm soo obsessed with basses, they're like the drug in a motion picture
Found And Explained Apologize*
This cool airplane should star in a Movie with all the features mentioned.
Sino-Russian jets aren’t going to break into the exotic jets market because they aren’t established. Their current focus on A320 and A350 class planes are good; high volume middle of the market market where they can get a slice.
Why did you put "hummer and sickle" on preview if project was definitely from post-Soviet era?
But doesn't today's Aeroflot still incorporate the hammer and sickle?
@@HC-cb4yp No. Russian Federation and it's commercial companies don't use hammer and sickle for almost thirty years. Basically, since the USSR fell.
0:25 dud that intro, hella sick I can listen to it all day
“Мам can we have an a380?”
“нет we have an a380 at home”
The a380 at home:
Yes, in Soviet times, a two-story airplane was developed, it remained on paper, it's a pity.
Nor really, as most Soviet Design Studies were exactly that, Design Studies...
If the 747 and A380 had a baby
The thing that worried me the most was evacuation times. That lower deck would have been a real struggle just in boarding and disembarking and we have all seen how crazy people get once the plane has landed. Multiply that craziness with panicking idiots in a life or death situation and there are going to be a lot of casualties. If the aircraft was fitted for total economy class then I shudder to think of the casualty figures.
That's what worried you? I can see it, but I'll raise you a question: How many Russian made/designed civil aircraft types haven't crashed? I believe it's all of them at some point.
TU-114 never crashed.
@@arlnodii "During its service life, the Tu-114 had only one fatal accident. On 17 February 1966, Aeroflot Flight 65 attempted to take off from Moscow" Wikipedia is your friend
@@simu31 Are we talking about human error or mechanical error?
@@simu31 thx.
Was always a pipe dream
well now we know what a double Decker 747 would look like
I know its old, but its a really nice Design which united the nice design elements of A380 and 747 into 1 Plane, puts nice (Carrier) flighterjet like folding wings on it, and a stair which makes it possible to board without stairtrucks or skybridge.
Even tough it should have more then once when it has soo many ppl onboard, for a fast and efficient Boardning and Deboarding.
We need this to happen!
1:28 KRYLA _(клила)_ mean VINGS in Ukrainian,
not russian language.
In russian it’s KRYL’YA _(крылья)._
Hello there Mr. Nick , I subscribed to you day before yesterday on the 13th of March 2021 and I have watched all your videos. I just finished watching the Russian A380/747 - the Super Jumbo Jet That Never Got Built. All the videos are so cool , nice animations. I wish that I had found this channel earlier. The Animations are fantastic. Waiting for more videos on other topics too.
Hey the Australian guy is back! Subscribing..
Cheers!
Omg you are the first to comment on the channel 😂😆
@@itstomatogear6806 then what does he mean by back. This ain't the first video??
@@BengalLancer haha
An-124 and An-225 both have two sets of front wheel sets.
because it's the same technology invented by russian inventor and Chief designer of An-124 and An-225 Viktor Tolmachev. Oleg Antonov called him PROFESSOR .
3:15 Every other aircraft? Nose wheel on a B 52, works well.
Ah yes, the Sukhoi Aerobus. Can’t wait to watch!
Russia makes the best science fiction cartoon movies.
Looks like the aircraft from the movie Flight Plan 😁
Randomly recommended and already interested in your content. Y’gained a sub mate!
Welcome aboard! I have more videos just like this one on the channel and on the way - three more actually out before the end of the month I hope!
Now, this one I don't remember. Thank you!
Planes look better when the cockpit is on the highest deck.
Take note, Airbus.
no.
Bring this beast back! Perfect for pandemic times like now
Uh. Oh. The Coronavirus has become sentient like an itty bitty land shark.
Just what we needed, the Yugo of the skies.
It sounds cool on paper and the future. The amount of mechanical failures would be alot and it also seems like the maintenance would be excessive.
What if the hydraulics fail and the wing closes
o o f
Boeing is trying to address that problem with the 777x
They default to open position, meaning you need hydraulic pressure to fold the wingtip. In the event of a hydraulic failure, the wingtip would simply be held in whatever position it was in.
@@tjfSIM *we'll be right back*
@Hamidkhan Abdullakhan The folding wing tips on the 777 are so small the aircraft will be able to fly even if they fall off, just less efficiently.
I found somehow it has a much elegant wing design compare to a380s, look at that BWB design.
I think it would have been better if the ends swiveled back instead of up. I can see how there would be structural issues with supporting a 15 meter+ extension on the end of a wing that was vertical.
it's not a mix of 747 and a380,it's a mix of the an225,747,and the a380
You guys have grown I remember watching your first video and I was the first viewer
Its actually just me - one guy! haha thanks so much for watching for so long! i hope you stick around :)
when the 747 and a380 became friends......
kr 800: exists
both 747 and a380: wait, nooooooo!!!
Great! Now we need an a319/737-700, an a320/737-800, an 757/a321, an 777/a330, an 787a350 and an Embraer e-jet/a220
I was his subscriber since this video. And I am so proud and happy I pressed that subscribe button
That bass!😉
Very nice video, well documented. Thanks :)
Fascinating- Impressive design, would have been a beast!
My thoughts exactly. I love the escalators onboard.
well... it really started to develope in USSR, but than fall of USSR and new company Sukhoi decided to review that project. But u probably didn't know that Boeing together with Sukhoi developed a new plane - Sukhoi Superjet 100. So KR-860 lost. Now in russian aviation came to new concept - flying wing. So aviation technologies will go from "pipe with wings (sausage) " to " flying wing ". About concepts close to flying wing - make internet search for " Frigate Ecojet".
Aircraft companies: so why should we get this new Russian airliner
Sukhoi: its super manoeuvrable
wish they build one of those so we can see it in real life.. that would be epic
I would ride the escalators.
yeah, i would go around up and down though
it would be posible if USSR existed. now russian companies r counting money!
when u ask your mum for 747 and a380 we already have it at home sukhoi kr-860
Your 1k Subscriber... Congratulations Man..!
Your So Good.. Deserved It Man
Good video BTW. :)
Thanks so much! I hope you stick around to see what’s next!
bass, nice
This plane in 2060:releases
Emirates and etihad: I will take ur entire stock
God can you imagine?
Da future only God can see
Not necessarily Etihad. And I bet Emirates will change or go bust by then.
I wish this air craft got built
I was sub for u for a week and when I watch this video I was remembering that I wasn’t subscribed for u when I watch this xD
Nice 💖
looks cool
Until now, I had never heard of this aircraft design by Sukhoi.
It looks like an A380 and a 747 combined
The teardrop cockpit was also already practically used on a plane, the AN22 used such a design.
cockpit, twin front gear - technologies developed by Chief designer of An-124 and An-225.
This plane, is just the 747 and the A380 merged together to formed a cursed plane that flies
The A380 was actually originally conceived as a 1000 seat aircraft. Airbus then thought that was to big a leap in 1 go, so made it shorter. Lots of pics on Google showing the 'stretched' version.
This is a additional point which broke the neck of the 380 - The wings and the structure were still made for the 1000 passenger -900 version, the wings are too heavy and too big for the -800 and have a inferior aspect ratio because of the 80 m wingspan limit.
Well, the Russians dodged that bullet.
Because Putin’s government didn’t see much of a use in Russia.
@@grahamturner2640 Or anywhere else? Perhaps they were on target for once? Sadly, A380 failed and the 747 production is ending soon.
Nice video but the volume is too low
If an 225 was airliner it maybe the first and only aircraft with triple deck in the world
So this is where it started
The cargo container and the train car would have never flown. That is straight up marketing department not consulting the engineers / designers.
The weight from one of those containers and the train carriage would ruin their flight capacity. It's more economical to fly twice the cargo in lightweight containers, as the value of not having to do the transfer does not outweigh that capacity.
Did you research before this comment?
B747:Mom
A380:Dad
The plane in this video:Son
Boeing 747 + Airbus A380 = Russian A380
Any very short videos on reliable Russian passengers jets?
Do you think the model from the airshow still exists somewhere?
Hope Boeing will seriously consider such an aircraft in future.
Would love the aircraft that was in casino royale to be built.
Antonov An-225
Passenger version
yea. a few technologies from An-124 and An-225 like twin front gear and upgraded cockpit.
The largest plane in the world
Boeing 747&airbus A380 has left the chat
Cockpit high to allow cargo version front door. Similar to 747 ..however good idea.
Awesome videos but pleeeease, add some bright/treble to your voice, it is hard to hear you if you have a decent set of audio plugged to the TV.
Made this with no microphone in a sharehouse in Indonesia! Don’t worry the next videos I made are much nicer I hope you watch them as well! And if your happy, subscribe!
Audio is incredibly bass heavy, I have F&E videos play all the time but this is the first aviation station video and I had to drop the balance from +5 bass to -6 bass to not blow the sub.
u gotta love how they used stuff from msfs2020
What about the fourth option? Talk about the McDonell Douglas MD-12
Look like the Antonov 124!
That shape really looks like the 747 just got a bit fat
Looks like an A380 on Wish
They should have built at least a prototype and look how successful that Antanov aircraft was
In Russia, the A380 flies you.
In Russia, you fly the A380.
Nope, doesn't fit
In Russia, the A380 builds the Engineers.
In Russia cargo carries plane
If an A380 and A B747 had a kid
would be cool to see this in rl
Now I know we're Boeing got there folding 777x winglets
Boeing only uses it to maintain the current ICAO class of the 777 (the next class would be less flexible and cost more landing fees). Over 80 m they need it.
The 380 should also have had such folding wings, they squeezed the wings to 79,80 m, but got a bad aspect ratio which costed fuel efficiency.
"Every other aircraft has a tricycle design".... He says, ignoring the B-52
This looks like an an-124. Twin forward nose gear and all. I don't ever see a Russian plain rocking non russian jets.
Few words about technologies used in this concept:
1. special cockpit. It's kind of same like on An-124 and An-225, but only 2 pilots needed.
2. twin front gear like An-124 and An-225.
3. internal wing structure like An-124.
4. folding wings like on Russian fighters. This technology will be used on the new An-124-300 aircraft ... or rather, on the new cargo plane SLON (elephant). probably will build under IL aviation manufacturer.
All this technologies came from An-124 and An-225 Chief designer Viktor Tolmachev. He was a Great Man !
1:00 why does that look like FS2020
This video scores at least a 5 on the Richter scale...
You need to do a better EQ on your audio as it’s very low end heavy. Many device. Need to be at full volume just to hear you speaks....
Yes i am very sorry. all my new videos are fixed. This last one was done on a bad speaker :)
Cool, you have good content. Will follow your Channel, keep it up, cheers
Awesome video! Great work, everyone go support Found and explained! So we can keep getting Awesome videos!
Music in the background whats it called? :D Please let me know I love it
I’ll see if I can find it. I’m sure it’s from the UA-cam music library that you have in the studio
@@FoundAndExplained Gonna be hard to find it, if u could guide me a bit where to look in the library I'd be super happy!
If this russian thing crashes in the world trade center, jesus
How great would it have been to see the KR-860 at ‘the trough’ alongside the 747 and A-380?!
Just you wait till you see the Lockheed a380 video next week...
Found And Explained. Ah, I’ll look forward to this!
A380 is an thing that is only good thing
This is the son of A380 and B747 after they got married
I hope it can fly from Hong Kong to the United States of America one day.