NASA lost this TECHNOLOGY 60 YEARS AGO

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 вер 2022
  • 🌏 Get Exclusive NordVPN 4 month free deal here ➼nordvpn.com/integza It's risk-free with Nord's 30-day money-back guarantee! ✌
    The work at TUB has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 956803. Website: inspire.cerfacs.fr/en/home/
    Solenoid Valve:amzn.to/3YrrwJJ
    3D Models :
    3D Printer I used:www.elegoo.com/products/elego...
    Resin I used:siraya.tech/products/blu-toug...
    Follow me on Instagram: / integza
    Support me on Patreon: / integza
    Paypal me:paypal.me/jgomes1992?locale.x...
    Discord: / discord
    Reddit: / integza
    #engine #rocket #3dprinted
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 6 тис.

  • @smartereveryday
    @smartereveryday Рік тому +7038

    You need to visit Huntsville

    • @integza
      @integza  Рік тому +1249

      Do they have one of these babies there ?

    • @rogerrinkavage
      @rogerrinkavage Рік тому +567

      @@integza i think Dustin's there...

    • @Collinoeight
      @Collinoeight Рік тому +51

      Living there was the best time of my life

    • @josphe9011
      @josphe9011 Рік тому +26

      Just moved there :p

    • @titanbot11
      @titanbot11 Рік тому +156

      @@rogerrinkavage Is Dustin a RDE?

  • @integza
    @integza  Рік тому +2250

    I big thank you to Dr. Myles, Dr. Eric Bach and Dr. Quentin Michalski for the help they provided!

    • @JokerJonny
      @JokerJonny Рік тому +33

      Never thought that you go to Berlin for Rocket engine research... how was my home country?

    • @marz.6102
      @marz.6102 Рік тому +9

      Why don't you make a future video on ways to make stronger resins and filaments or materials for your 3d printers for your future projects for example using graphene for the resins,
      Will it work?
      I don't know
      But you will get the ball rolling.

    • @specknik356
      @specknik356 Рік тому +15

      Can you share the Japanese Paper? Its really fascinating. The link in the description seems to only provide the Model. Really great Video!

    • @majick13
      @majick13 Рік тому +5

      Thanks for including the lab built rocket and the individuals that built it, I love to watch your videos and it's really cool to see how there are people in academia doing research on the same thing you are 3d printing! Would using something made by the Explosions and Fire channel help ignite the RDE? It might be worth it to reach out to him and see what types he'd recommend.

    • @pubz2288
      @pubz2288 Рік тому +2

      Discord link isn't working, can you send a new one?

  • @SgtSteel1
    @SgtSteel1 8 місяців тому +15

    How that tiny engine made that metal rod glow and bend is insane. Imagine this little engine being 100x the size.

    • @idiot528
      @idiot528 2 дні тому

      Sir the earth has become a donut

  • @joshuawlam
    @joshuawlam 9 місяців тому +7

    10:51 Integza made an entire anime movie in like 30 seconds! Good job.

  • @andren2747
    @andren2747 Рік тому +2690

    Suggestion: Journey to an actual standalone rocket/plane/car - I really enjoy your content but working towards a practical, containerised engine for moving vehicles would propel you to anti-tomato legend status! I know it would be a much longer project, especially getting pressurised fuel into a reliable lightweight stand-alone format, but maybe collaborating with more like-minded people from e. g. the RC sector could make it a lot easier - In any case I look forward to seeing what comes next!

    • @cry9740
      @cry9740 Рік тому +2

      Yeah!

    • @mikhail010
      @mikhail010 Рік тому

      Hell yeah

    • @ryanrich9186
      @ryanrich9186 Рік тому +4

      I had the same thought, but on a slightly larger scale.... I've seen people build rc aircraft that are friggin HUGE.... why couldn't one be made to carry a payload of say 200 pounds? 250 pounds? And if this can be done, would it be possible to use an engine like this since the tanks are relatively small... I have been designing a " personal aircraft " for many years, without the needed knowledge to be successful, but using my gi bill I am currently going through on an aerospace engineering degree.... I am hoping to tinker my way to a fun and REALLY dangerous toy some time in the next decade.

    • @AirNeat
      @AirNeat Рік тому +1

      Peter Streipol please help us!!

    • @loganhenning4850
      @loganhenning4850 Рік тому +1

      @@ryanrich9186 what's your email? I think I could help you out a bit here... just finished my first test flight building one out of my garage (theoretical 500 lb thrust)

  • @PlasmaChannel
    @PlasmaChannel Рік тому +602

    Just when I thought there were only so many types of rocket engines, my mind gets obliterated....tomato level obliterated. Phenomenal Joel!

    • @integza
      @integza  Рік тому +77

      Nothing like the smell of burnt tomato in the morning !

    • @RainaPCB
      @RainaPCB Рік тому +2

      @@integza does it taste good?

    • @TyMoore95503
      @TyMoore95503 Рік тому

      @@RainaPCB Mmm...saucy!

    • @flattirefire
      @flattirefire Рік тому +3

      @@RainaPCB no, tomatoes are disgusting

    • @_blood_moon_proto_1500
      @_blood_moon_proto_1500 Рік тому +1

      i think there is over a 1000 types of rocket engine as is, not even counting ones lost to history which last i checked is estimated to be in the hundreds, oh and integza the shotgun shell ignition is actually a technique that started with British tractors then a few planes, loud but fun....makes me wonder if a vacuum based rocket is feasible, you know, one that pull's air from the environment like a jet engine

  • @Dus10Sievs
    @Dus10Sievs 9 місяців тому +6

    A future video for a non-conventional propulsion method for a quadrocoptor would be amazing. Something a DIYer could make mostly with a resin 3d printer and hopefully no more than $1000 of purchased parts.

  • @bradheath4200
    @bradheath4200 Місяць тому +1

    I admire your curiosity, intelligence and drive to do something simply for the sake of learning from it young man. Good luck and safe travels my friend.

  • @JoelCreates
    @JoelCreates Рік тому +400

    My favorite engine you've done so far!

  • @arefabdala644
    @arefabdala644 Рік тому +313

    I’m a researcher at the University of Central Florida specialized in RDE’s and Pressure Gained Devices. I have been watching your videos for a while and would love to talk more if you are interested. My next video idea would be to make the RDE combustion chamber annual and attempt to observe the actual rotating detonation. An additional idea would be to create a planar RDE which would use this exact same set up and would just be used to observe the detonation wave.

    • @KayleeVRC
      @KayleeVRC Рік тому +1

      Upvote this please ⬆

    • @seemlesslies
      @seemlesslies Рік тому +5

      My issue with this type of engine is that they are INSANELY AND EXTREMELY UNSTABLE. While I know hopefully in the future we might be able to implement these types of engines there is a reason why haven't seen that happen.
      I did see P&W got a contract for them, but it will be interesting to see if anything comes of the research.
      I remember during my capstone someone gave a presentation of these and I highly rolled my eyes at them.
      As an AE we already have enough problems with airplanes trying to blow themselves up.

    • @bingwrite7099
      @bingwrite7099 Рік тому +10

      @@seemlesslies As an A&P I can confirm, turbines like to blow themselves up haha.
      It would be interesting to see an RDE used in a sort of “afterburner” theory behind a turbojet. If it was centered on the inner axis and the compressor section could direct compressed HydrOx fuel air mix you *could* potentially have enough pressure to drive the combustion wave.
      I guess you could think of it like a shotgun, inside a cannon hahaha

    • @akshaygode4993
      @akshaygode4993 Рік тому +3

      Buddy am interested to listen to your talk and view on this technology, can you share your insta id, we can connect there and talk further!

    • @gSys1337
      @gSys1337 Рік тому +2

      Give this guy some likes. I want to see the collaboration video.

  • @survivaloptions4999
    @survivaloptions4999 9 місяців тому +3

    You a couple of years ago: I want to build a decent chemical rocket motor.
    You, sometime next week or so: My warp engine is running too hot.

  • @geoffkeller5337
    @geoffkeller5337 9 місяців тому

    Great video and you really keep things very interesting.
    Would like to suggest building something to move / levitate heavy objects with vibration / frequency.

  • @rebelg
    @rebelg Рік тому +2772

    After following Integza for a while, I think the real question is: when is he flying to the Mars using his 3d-printed engine?

    • @TheSimonarne
      @TheSimonarne Рік тому +61

      my prediction is he will have a 3d printed rocket flying to space in 12 years. so its bound to happen eventually

    • @CyberKalle
      @CyberKalle Рік тому +3

      True lol

    • @viktorf1861
      @viktorf1861 Рік тому +7

      I wrote the same thing with the Moon and then I saw your comment.

    • @camplays487
      @camplays487 Рік тому +13

      He’s gotta take a golf club with him so he can swing at a tomato under Martian gravity😅

    • @TheSimonarne
      @TheSimonarne Рік тому +1

      @@camplays487 what!?

  • @challacustica9049
    @challacustica9049 Рік тому +111

    Integza, you are incredible, this engine has been used solely by research labs. Amazing work.

  • @williamroberts6803
    @williamroberts6803 Місяць тому

    It’s like spinning water to get it to drain faster, you spin the detonation to get more thrust through the same size hole. It’s not that complicated.

  • @cliryu
    @cliryu 4 місяці тому +1

    hey if ur looking for the song used at 10:50 its hoshimuru yoruni

  • @MaxBrauns
    @MaxBrauns Рік тому +94

    Damn Bro I still remember you working out of your fire hazard of an attic with just a 3d printer and limited knowledge, you have come so far in a impressively short time! Its very inspirational honestly! keep it up man!

  • @akiko009
    @akiko009 Рік тому +400

    As an alternative to the primer from gun shells, you could go to a well stocked tool store and ask for the "powder loads" or "strip" for a Hilti gun (aka "Powder-Actuated Fastening Tool"). The nice thing is that those come in multiple strengths, so you can pick one that works for you.

    • @ianvincent4911
      @ianvincent4911 Рік тому +35

      Alternatively, depending on Airsoft rules in Portugal, you might be able to buy the 209 primers from Airsoft suppliers, as they are used in Airsoft Grenades/mines.

    • @DerekSmit
      @DerekSmit Рік тому +9

      I don't know the rules for Portugal, but I think an alarm gum might be legal, it's basically a gun that can sound like a gun but not shoot anything.

    • @kenreynolds1000
      @kenreynolds1000 Рік тому +7

      I recall Mythbusters setting off .22 rounds with electricity. Those are rim fired cases as well.

    • @Fraxxxi
      @Fraxxxi Рік тому +5

      The DX460 is fully automatic, with a 27 caliber charge. Wood, concrete, steel to steel, she'll throw a fastener into anything. And for my money, she handles recoil better than the Simpson or the P3500.

    • @spyteamsatan3553
      @spyteamsatan3553 Рік тому +2

      The gunpowder in the shotgun shell won't explode until its confined. Pistol powders burn faster than shotgun powders. The explosive in a modern primer is usually a combination of things based around Lead styphnate.
      As alternative sources for detonation;
      You might be able to use something like Armstrong's mixture (usually available premade in pull string fireworks, kids capgun toys, either the red paper strips or the little red plastic 'loads').
      Or, the mercury fulminate from party poppers, snap pops, adult crackers, ie the fireworks you throw against the ground.

  • @DDDelgado
    @DDDelgado 4 дні тому

    Mate, A comparison to other propulsion methods would be great to have an idea. maybe power to weight ration, or thrust?

  • @XxSteamStreamxX
    @XxSteamStreamxX 9 місяців тому +1

    7:32, okay I don't know how this happened, but this is the first video of yours I've watched, and when I got to this part I couldn't believe it because I literally started this show yesterday.

  • @andrewdoesyt7787
    @andrewdoesyt7787 Рік тому +175

    Video idea: Build an Ion drive propulsion engine!
    It can be quite simple, MIT made one that’s pretty much just a positively charged cable parallel to a negative, they made it generate thrust, so Basically it’s a glorified air purifier with a cable behind it.
    There are some other more complex concepts like the ones they use on spacecraft (every SpaceX star-link satellite has one), although they are more complicated and expensive.

    • @xxportalxx.
      @xxportalxx. Рік тому +18

      The plasma channel just did a video on one I think

    • @maulidonda
      @maulidonda Рік тому

      Hmm do you have more info on the simple ion thruster? A link maybe?

    • @Meowzofficial
      @Meowzofficial Рік тому +4

      in 3 years he makes a nerva / atomic engine

    • @usp211816
      @usp211816 Рік тому

      @@xxportalxx. pics or it didnt happen ua-cam.com/video/nrEBoPYS4ns/v-deo.html&ab_channel=PlasmaChannel

    • @leno_8667
      @leno_8667 Рік тому +1

      @@xxportalxx. true

  • @netanelelbaz7247
    @netanelelbaz7247 Рік тому +3826

    I love your videos!, create a drone powered by a rocket engine!

    • @chargonium1
      @chargonium1 Рік тому +3

      Y E S

    • @slatetechnologies1724
      @slatetechnologies1724 Рік тому +5

      That would be too expensive though. 4 ROCKET ENGINES on each side.
      Also the RC gear would be too heavy because you have to throttle each engine to make it lean in a certain way.
      Also throttling a rocket engine is not as fast as slowing down a BLDC Motor.

    • @netanelelbaz7247
      @netanelelbaz7247 Рік тому +1

      @@slatetechnologies1724 :(

    • @slatetechnologies1724
      @slatetechnologies1724 Рік тому +2

      @@netanelelbaz7247 What?

    • @3dpprofessor
      @3dpprofessor Рік тому +4

      @@netanelelbaz7247 So, a couple of things to consider with this idea. Most drones achieve rotation by taking advantage of the rotational inertia of the propellers. But rocket engines don't have that, so simply replacing props with rocket engines will result in a hover-only drone.
      Instead it would be best to do it the way NASA did with their Project Morpheus; a single rocket engine to provide hover thrust and smaller engines to stabilize it and provide side thrust.
      Which brings up the point that NASA's already doing that.
      Also, don't beg for likes.

  • @butterball2000
    @butterball2000 7 місяців тому

    This was one of the most interesting things I've seen in a long time. I did even know this existed and you taught me something new.

  • @tonymraymond
    @tonymraymond 9 місяців тому +2

    Need a follow up video to this!!

  • @ilyes5560
    @ilyes5560 Рік тому +87

    After following integza for quit a while it's makes me happy to see how he started from making working stuff that looks like a grandma who's waiting it's final moment to be free to Making thing that actually works and looks like it was made to last, very proud of you integza😢

  • @jerryyang7123
    @jerryyang7123 Рік тому +74

    It's so cool to see how every video his design gets better, materials get better, and his success rate improves.

  • @recnepsgnitnarb6530
    @recnepsgnitnarb6530 7 годин тому

    So, let me get this straight. You're making a high impulse rocket engine that can be started with a modified Coffman starter? Cool!

  • @johnlynch-kv8mz
    @johnlynch-kv8mz Місяць тому

    9:30 Yeah, no one wants to be standing next to one of those while it’s operating. I think that tomato was traumatized forever.

  • @samreid6010
    @samreid6010 Рік тому +155

    The part with you standing up against the door when it went off reminds me of when I used to work for my local utility. One day I was at the plant while they were doing an inspection of one of the gas turbines. I didn’t have much to do that day so I stuck around and watched. They finished up and went inside to spin it up for peak and I was just watching from the corner when one of them turns to me and says, “you’re in the no no square”
    Apparently, once the generator has synced up its voltage and phase to the grid, a massive breaker trips to connect the generator to the grid. If that connection fails for some reason there’s the possibility that all the power that generator is making will explode out, ripping the massive steel breaker door off its hinges and sending it straight through the no no square and whoever happens to be standing in it.

    • @connorwoods3652
      @connorwoods3652 Рік тому +3

      That's insane. I'm more curious about that than anything else now lol

    • @792slayer
      @792slayer Рік тому +2

      "OSHA approved"

    • @samreid6010
      @samreid6010 Рік тому +4

      @@792slayer it was a coal plant before the coal boilers were shuttered so there is a thick layer of coal dust covering half the plant. If there were a fire that place would go up like a torch, so yes, OSHA approved

    • @792slayer
      @792slayer Рік тому

      @@samreid6010 oof. That's hazardous as all hell.

    • @leovillant768
      @leovillant768 Рік тому

      The no no square

  • @bradleydennis210
    @bradleydennis210 Рік тому +106

    RDEs are typically an annular design with a center spike (similar to aerospike), so you could potentially try using a cooled center spike to guide the rotating detonation wace around the circumference
    Edit: In addition, the detonation wave propagates around at the inlet of the chamber so your ignition source/detonation seed should also be closer in that area

    • @npsit1
      @npsit1 Рік тому +3

      That's what I was thinking. If you just have large open combustion chamber, the combustion doesn't really have a path; you just have to hope it'll stick to the outside wall.

    • @dongleseon8785
      @dongleseon8785 Рік тому +7

      If you read the original paper they specifically say that it's achievable without inner cylinder. But it probably makes it easier.

    • @pancakemonkey1543
      @pancakemonkey1543 Рік тому +5

      Instead of having the fuel go through to try to cool the center you could just have the feul or air cool the outside wall like on the space shuttle rocket motor

    • @b-e-a-r6166
      @b-e-a-r6166 Рік тому

      RE your comment about the central spike, that had also crossed my mind. I didn't even think about where the detonation should start. Thanks!

    • @dongleseon8785
      @dongleseon8785 Рік тому

      Another problem which becomes obvious if you open up his 3d file is that the injector is placed in quite bad manner that oxy and fuel won't be mixed in time.
      Edit: the paper he referred to has initiator 65mm apart from the injector surface. I don't think it should be close to the combustion area. Plus, geometrical bump from the initiator might disturb the shockwave. You don't want to have shockwave echoing around especially because it doesn't have guiding inner cylinder in this case.

  • @anteconfig5391
    @anteconfig5391 8 місяців тому

    Hey there Mr. Integza!!! I just wanted to say that gun powder does explode. It just needs to be put into a container. When you ignite the powder it quickly turns into gas (keywork: quickly). When the container can no longer hold the pressure of the gas released by the gun powder then the container rips apart allowing the gas to be expelled forcefully in all directions. That's an explosion.

  • @simphiwemngadi2815
    @simphiwemngadi2815 2 місяці тому

    I am inspired by your work, it educates me a lot. I like the fact you are funny at sometimes very educating.

  • @quistador7
    @quistador7 Рік тому +78

    This is so awesome. Pretty insane that we get 5 min of incredible footage that probably took months to plan and bring together

  • @wimtzw
    @wimtzw Рік тому +68

    My theme suggestion is to create a load cell to compare the different engines you've made so far. Seeing these home-made 3D printed engines is great. But giving people context like how much force this engine is producing, and maybe how much fuel its using compared to other engines you've made, might be even better.

  • @jlfqam
    @jlfqam Місяць тому

    the problem with the RDE is that the combustion takes place on the walls of the chamber, so the forces are directed towards the nearest or the opposite walls, so no net push takes place, well just a shake, but a pressure buildup that blasts the chamber. The net force that causes thrust is the one directed towards the closed end of the combustion chamber which is not compensated by a like force from the open end of the chamber, i.e., the exhaust, because expanding gases move out of the chamber. This is what happens when a shotgun is fired with something blocking the expanding gases trying to move out from the barrel.

  • @SapioiT
    @SapioiT 6 місяців тому +1

    I think the issue might have been that you're not spiraling the airflow before it gets to the nozzle. That seems to be the way to get the detonation spiraling.

  • @rossvoorheis2391
    @rossvoorheis2391 Рік тому +20

    Man these videos are getting so good. Buddy went from homemade carbon fiber pulse jets to visiting national labs and working on cutting-edge stuff in the space of a year, all while managing to educate his audience. Well done.

  • @mateorandomvideosmrv8823
    @mateorandomvideosmrv8823 Рік тому +51

    The level of your videos are improving everytime, not only in design and performance, also in post production, clips etc.

    • @hopper131
      @hopper131 Рік тому

      100%. It's also time to let the pseudo-Tesla look go. Ultimately it's distracting from the presenter himself, and his message. Schtick only goes so far.

    • @KirsiKitten
      @KirsiKitten Рік тому

      Absolutely, this is one of his best yet!

    • @WarttHog
      @WarttHog Рік тому

      And very slowly, safety! Lol

  • @nickrider5220
    @nickrider5220 5 місяців тому

    That RDE was very, very impressive 😮😎 I'll have to look through your other videos to see how you got on 👍

  • @mattgrenier7369
    @mattgrenier7369 9 місяців тому

    In the US our hardware stores have a brand called "Ramset" that uses primers to set nails in concrete. The primers are about $14 for a box of 100. They should be cheaper than cutting up shotgun shells if you can find them.

  • @karlheinz6880
    @karlheinz6880 Рік тому +84

    Idea: I would love to see you use a piezo pressure sensor with an oscilloscope and a high speed camera so we can see whats really going on and maybe improve the engine. ( i know high speed cameras are very expensive but maybe you can lend one locally or from Dave of eevblog)

    • @Takatakyong
      @Takatakyong Рік тому

      I have a feeling that a pressure transducer that is able to read such high pressures would be ridiculously expensive. But it would be rad to see

    • @dtibor5903
      @dtibor5903 Рік тому

      @@Takatakyongcars have detonation sensors

    • @hjjfffaa
      @hjjfffaa Рік тому +1

      @@dtibor5903 Those are acoustic, specific for a frequency, and not exposed to an environment harsher than a warm engine block.

    • @karlheinz6880
      @karlheinz6880 Рік тому

      @@Takatakyong I mean if acrylic can hold the pressure its not that high ;) If not maybe a throttle/throttle valve could lower the pressure to the sensor range

  • @SnoopyNug
    @SnoopyNug Рік тому +162

    Damn dude I can’t wait to see the engines you’re making in 3 years. Every video you improve your building technique and they work better and better

    • @LordDecapo
      @LordDecapo Рік тому +7

      RIGHT!?!?! this one is blowing my mind.... exponential growth on his part it seems

    • @Praecantetia
      @Praecantetia Рік тому +3

      eventually he will work for nasa

    • @Dindonmasker
      @Dindonmasker Рік тому +1

      bro it's not rocket science... wait...

    • @leocabaret7050
      @leocabaret7050 Рік тому +1

      In 3 years, he is gonna have an actual metal 3D printer

    • @SnoopyNug
      @SnoopyNug Рік тому

      @@leocabaret7050 I am so excited for this man to start printing metal engines

  • @tygrdragon
    @tygrdragon 4 місяці тому +1

    this engine is just so cool. from the looks of things, it seems to be very similar in design to an aerospike jet engine, but instead of just having linear air pressure, it spirals it!
    at least ti'm pretty sure that's what it's doing. from how their design looks, i think they aren't just using high pressured air, i think they're actually spiraling the air around the central cone to create that high speed shock wave needed for detonation to actually be useful. otherwise it would just go straight no matter how powerful the detonation is.
    basically, i think the thing needed to cause the spiraling effect to occur consistently, would be to angle the extremely high pressured air tubes either clockwise, or counterclockwise around a fixed central cylinder, like an aerospike. that way the high pressured air actually spins the fuel, rather than just pushing it out faster.
    At times like these, I wish i were better at 3d modeling.

  • @BALDAR222
    @BALDAR222 9 місяців тому

    The shot gun shell's detonator is Mercury Fulminate. This is also used in the blasting caps for dynamite.

  • @gabedarrett1301
    @gabedarrett1301 Рік тому +532

    It's quite impressive how you're able to make these projects, especially since this is cutting edge technology that governments, corporations, and universities are researching. Truly outstanding work!

    • @azbolicle1
      @azbolicle1 Рік тому +27

      Then bro tells us how to for free 💀

    • @kiyoponnn
      @kiyoponnn Рік тому +29

      ​​@@azbolicle1 Well yeah open source knowledge is how you keep the corps' and governments' egos in check
      edit: wasn't expecting the japanese song and death note reference

    • @andchip.s
      @andchip.s Рік тому +21

      Like all great inventions, they started either in a basement or a garage. Governments and universities have much higher funding and facilities however this does not mean they are the be all end all, the real genius is to cobble together or make the parts your self, that's the spark of ingenuity.

    • @CoolaDiamond
      @CoolaDiamond 9 місяців тому +1

      ​@@azbolicle1
      You need to pay with everything you have + 7 billion dollars.

    • @azbolicle1
      @azbolicle1 9 місяців тому +1

      @@CoolaDiamond wait no my student loans savings- WAIT NOOO

  • @AiOinc1
    @AiOinc1 Рік тому +36

    This guy is insane, that's some amazing high speed footage too
    Also, using a smaller engine to start a larger engine is not terribly uncommon. They're called a pony engine usually, and a lot of industrial engines and tractors have them.

    • @chryssalidbait8765
      @chryssalidbait8765 Рік тому +4

      Your car has it. There's an electrical motor that starts the gasoline engine.

    • @tarcisofilho4878
      @tarcisofilho4878 Рік тому

      @@chryssalidbait8765 YEah, and larger turbine engines rely on pneumatic starters.

    • @blu5021
      @blu5021 Рік тому

      They use them on commercial jets and i think on the A-10 warthog

  • @johnnyappleseed.4420
    @johnnyappleseed.4420 8 місяців тому

    you should do a skit where you actually eat tomatoes and your VPN hides the photographic evidence.
    Can I have my 3d printer now. lol

  • @raxsavvage
    @raxsavvage 9 місяців тому

    feel like nasa never lost the ability to roast a tomato

  • @ShireaTV
    @ShireaTV Рік тому +30

    I swear every video gets me more excited to see what the next one is. the rocket engine experiments are so cool the way you do them

  • @KingofArsenal
    @KingofArsenal Рік тому +37

    This hands down is your best project yet, and that is saying something since your other have been better that the last for nearly a year straight now! thank you for this channel! keep it up!

  • @erictaylor5462
    @erictaylor5462 5 місяців тому

    In the Space Shuttle they used 3 engines from AIM-9 air to air missiles to light off the SRBs.
    They only needed one, but the last thing you want on the Shuttle was to have one SRB to light wile the other fails to light.

  • @jackfairman7371
    @jackfairman7371 9 місяців тому +2

    Operator: "It has previously blown the door off!" integza: "Prove it while I stand behind a potentially high velocity projectile that could squash or seriously maime me!" Crazy man! lmao

  • @tetronaut88
    @tetronaut88 Рік тому +28

    Two ideas for future videos: use one of your amazing engines to power an RC car, or do a comparison video, comparing some of your engines based on thrust, fuel consumption etc.

    • @h3enryfoglia318
      @h3enryfoglia318 Рік тому

      Cooling a spike in that time is near impossible, I would try ceramic hoping that the detonation does not shatter it

  • @dillonvandergriff4124
    @dillonvandergriff4124 Рік тому +22

    Idea as part of the next video: a proper (transparent) blast shield! With the explosive nature of projects on this channel it could come in handy!

    • @runed0s86
      @runed0s86 Рік тому +2

      @@Mr.Beauregarde did you make a bot to detect and tell people to report scambots‽
      If so, you are awesome!

  • @draknight5081
    @draknight5081 23 дні тому

    I’ve never heard an engine just go “SCREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE”

  • @Jcron13
    @Jcron13 5 місяців тому

    That pressure is insane! I’m imagining how terrifying one of those would be but scale up to Saturn 5 rocket size!

  • @spinwarecorvallis9414
    @spinwarecorvallis9414 Рік тому +4038

    I've recently been stuck on spinlaunch, I've watched so many videos on there machine. And after seeing your videos here's my idea,
    I think you should build a miniature spinlauncher, you have plenty of knowledge of rockets and other propulsion devices and could use them to power the spin!
    Tomotoes are disgusting

    • @Xfixiateher
      @Xfixiateher Рік тому +37

      this account was made on;
      Joined Sep 28, 2022
      1k likes?
      zero comments?
      all alittle suspect to me. guess someone really wants that printer.

    • @5failedbubbleo489
      @5failedbubbleo489 Рік тому +1

      I also want that printer 😭😭😭

    • @boisq97
      @boisq97 Рік тому +36

      @@Xfixiateher not only that but spinlaunch is a scam

    • @spinwarecorvallis9414
      @spinwarecorvallis9414 Рік тому +5

      @@boisq97 they are a multi million dollar company that has shown time and time again to have a successful plan.

    • @kajtus5510
      @kajtus5510 Рік тому

      @@spinwarecorvallis9414 ua-cam.com/video/9ziGI0i9VbE/v-deo.html
      it's bullshit

  • @jrtanker2271
    @jrtanker2271 Рік тому +23

    Primers used to be mercury fulminate, but now they can differ between brands in their composition. The main thing is the powder, it must be compressed very tightly to itself and in a confined chamber to achieve the reaction speed you want just like it is when the shotgun shell is put together. It can also be rather hard to ignite properly which is why the primer is used for repeatability.

    • @blurglide
      @blurglide Рік тому

      If he uses some kind of burst disk to momentarily contain the powder, he might achieve detonation

    • @burningSHADOW42
      @burningSHADOW42 Рік тому

      The "Centerfire ammunition" article on wikipedia goes into detail in the primer chemistry.
      Short form: mecury is not used anymore, modern compounds are really complex and contain lead, although some "green" ones are starting to get more popular.

    • @jonp8015
      @jonp8015 Рік тому

      Yeah, it's funny how they switched from Murcury Fulmenide when they figured out how bad Mercury was... But what they changed it to was Lead Azide, because they didn't know how bad lead was yet... Now the standard is some kind of weird organic compound I can't remember the name of.
      Well, unless you got ammo made in the third world, then it probably still uses lead and mercury compounds.

    • @jacobalberty
      @jacobalberty Рік тому

      Isn't it usually lead styphnate now?

    • @burningSHADOW42
      @burningSHADOW42 Рік тому

      @@jacobalberty according to Wikipedia, half of it is. The rest is a combination of other stuff. At least in the US. In Europe it might be different.

  • @jamespray
    @jamespray Рік тому +38

    After all these engines, I'd like to see you build a generator! A turbine gen like a jenbacher would be pretty cool.

  • @cephotographic
    @cephotographic 9 місяців тому +108

    Maybe you need to add an aerospike so the detonation has something to spin around. The Miles-Bach-Michalski engine has a central spike though it was truncated. Another thought is to move the primer to the back of the device instead of the exit port and angle it to induce rotation. The MBM engine had their starter in that position. Also being in the Northern hemisphere you will want to spin anti-clockwise so you aren't fighting the Coriolis Effect.

    • @EbenEliasjr
      @EbenEliasjr 8 місяців тому

      Would that not make a bad engine design for practical use, a jet flying north to South across the equator, for instance how would that affect the rotation?

    • @serbianspaceforce6873
      @serbianspaceforce6873 6 місяців тому +9

      ⁠@@EbenEliasjri don't think the coriolis effect is that big of a deal

    • @EbenEliasjr
      @EbenEliasjr 6 місяців тому

      @serbianspaceforce6873 That's what I said. He was saying to have it spin anti-clockwise, and I said, "Is that not a bad design? What if the plane flies north, what really matters is the airflow through the engine and pressure gradients not the spin...otherwise we would notice a huge issue in modern turbo fan jet engine planes... any way your right and I agreed 👍

    • @jamesjohnson5700
      @jamesjohnson5700 Місяць тому

      Learn to keep ideas to yourself. You're not getting paid to share information

    • @cephotographic
      @cephotographic Місяць тому

      @@EbenEliasjr this engine has no moving parts. Only the shockwave rotates. The Coriolis Effect would be slight and I trying to think of ways to tweak performance especially at the small size @Integza was using.

  • @shalm2
    @shalm2 9 місяців тому

    Best destruction of an evil tomato yet! Need more tomato distruction videos, but also can't wait to see the next RDE vid.

  • @chrissmith7669
    @chrissmith7669 5 місяців тому

    It wasn’t just the F1 but the SSME also had problems with acoustic instability as i recall

  • @3ch0_17
    @3ch0_17 Рік тому +18

    I believe if you add a little bit of restriction to the nozzle of the engine, like the metal one in the lab, it will allow for a little bit of pressure to build on the inside which might help promote better detonation. It seemed that you had an original detonation followed by deflegration

    • @dongleseon8785
      @dongleseon8785 Рік тому

      I don't think you need restrictions on RDE. Whole point of RDE is that the exhaust is already supersonic without use of nozzle.

    • @3ch0_17
      @3ch0_17 Рік тому

      @@dongleseon8785 then how come the metal one in the lab has a type of nozzle?

    • @dongleseon8785
      @dongleseon8785 Рік тому

      @@3ch0_17 I think that's just a inner-cylinder that has narrowing ends? The whole thing looks quite straight cylindrical to me.

    • @3ch0_17
      @3ch0_17 Рік тому

      @@dongleseon8785 could possibly be. But I'm seeing that the size of the exit is smaller than integzas design

    • @dongleseon8785
      @dongleseon8785 Рік тому

      @@3ch0_17 I guess that would make a pressurized fuel mixture judging by the flowrate they use. Which would help greatly if your goal is to make a lot of thrust. But would the 3d printed part of integza withstand that kind of pressurized explosion...?

  • @MVPhurricane
    @MVPhurricane Рік тому +33

    oh man integza this might be my favorite video you've ever done! the break in the middle where you're playing the japanese song and cut the tube in half with the little effects and stuff is so great.

  • @samgrainger1554
    @samgrainger1554 5 днів тому

    Reminds me of steve moulds circular flames

  • @ZygmuntKiliszewski
    @ZygmuntKiliszewski 8 місяців тому

    Hello, you are doing quite advanced plasma thruster experiments. I'm curious about the voltages used between the electrodes, the current and what working gases they use. As far as I remember, the best would be noble gases, such as argon and xenon.
    Congratulations and best regards 😀

  • @Smallathe
    @Smallathe Рік тому +19

    A very neat test! I don't think you got to actually make a rotating PDE - but that is a descent attempt. I would love to see either form of 3D printed PDE actually taking off up in the air. It probably will have to be a theathered flight test... But I am doing more than just asking - community effort, right? - I'm also offering - I am more than willing to machine parts for the project too!

    • @yeetbeam2273
      @yeetbeam2273 Рік тому +2

      Someone get this man to the top of the comments

  • @johnbeauvais3159
    @johnbeauvais3159 Рік тому +28

    You can make a suitably sensitive primer type powder using Armstrong mixture from matches.
    The gun powder you used is actually smokeless powder, it’s nitro based and burns slowly at stp but burns much faster under pressure. Black powder (the old sulfur and charcoal stuff) burns faster at STP but doesn’t increase burn rate with greater pressure.

    • @mikker32
      @mikker32 Рік тому +2

      That is not true BP does burn faster under pressure

    • @justjako9145
      @justjako9145 Рік тому

      @@mikker32 even if it does nitrobased gunpowder is more powerfull

    • @haydennorris2913
      @haydennorris2913 Рік тому +2

      He didn't use gunpowder, he used the primer. The primer is usually a high explosive lead salt.

    • @linusc.3812
      @linusc.3812 Рік тому

      BP also drastically increases its burn rate when confined/under pressure, but not as much as smokeless powder.

  • @vanguard9067
    @vanguard9067 5 місяців тому

    I think RDEs already exist and are in use for the NGAD prototype. A number of engine manufacturers are hard at work on it at least, with a big announcement from GE just a few days ago about their recent (amazing) progress

  • @linyenchin6773
    @linyenchin6773 4 місяці тому

    10:50 is gold!! Anine intro theane and silly actions centred around running and looking lost 😂

  • @PrebleStreetRecords
    @PrebleStreetRecords Рік тому +74

    Fun gun/primer facts. Most modern primers use lead styphnate and a blend of other herbs and spices. However, older ones use lead azide, or mercury fulminate.
    Also, smokeless powder like what’s found in those shot shells just deflagrates, it isn’t a detonation like Black Powder does. Different powders have different “speeds” they build pressure at, pistol powders reach peak pressure faster than rifle powders (generally).
    If you’re looking to repeat this, check out primers for muzzleloaders (usually called caps). In heavily regulated countries they tend to be easier to acquire than centerfire primers like the #209 in that shot shell.
    There are also companies like Prime-All who sell primer component mixes which are themselves not regulated and not explosive, but can be used to create a primer mixture.
    Great video, and it’s a bit funny to me that it’s so tough to get ammo components there- I can buy them at my hardware store!

    • @fendermarxist
      @fendermarxist Рік тому +20

      black powder doesn't detonate either, it's actually one of the slowest burning things we classify as an explosive. you basically never want a high explosive as a gun propellant, too much risk of rupturing the barrel. the projectile doesn't accelerate via shockwave, but by building up the pressure as the propellant burns; that pressure then pushes the projectile down the barrel. incidentally that's why it looks so unimpressive when he burns it in the open; without that controlled pressure buildup, it's basically just a really expensive pile of tinder

    • @Tunkkis
      @Tunkkis Рік тому +8

      You can also acquire blanks for powder actuated tools in many European countries.

    • @braindecay9477
      @braindecay9477 Рік тому +6

      ​@@Tunkkis or be Austrian and over 18, then you can just buy the black powder in gun shops (and I'm assuming also smokeless powder, but black powder for sure. Can also get a rifle and rounds if you're at it lol, and we're not even close to the most liberal gun country in Europe)

    • @BooBaddyBig
      @BooBaddyBig 9 місяців тому +4

      You might think it's funny, but that's partly why his country doesn't have mass shootings every single day.

    • @Freezer003
      @Freezer003 9 місяців тому +3

      ​@@BooBaddyBighahahahahaha hahahahaha and spoons make people fat. NEXT.

  • @VanWarren
    @VanWarren Рік тому +25

    I really like this engine. There seems to be a really high frequency sound, even ultrasonic when it was running on your trip, and possibly in your lab. If you used propane which is widely available in cylinders of different sizes instead of hydrogen, you could still produce a detonation with a relatively clean exhaust. If you could use air instead of oxygen and sustain the rotating detonation wave that would be fantastic also. If you took several, say 5 of these units made of extruded clay cylinders and placed their exhausts in an axial bunch, and then twisted them with front and back endplates like a manifold, you could put a greater path length in a shorter package. If they were made of ceramic they could tolerate the heat better than metal. The nice thing about these RDE's is that they could run at very high Carnot efficiencies. Ramjets have a low theoretical efficiency because they depend on the Ram effect to compress the air. RDE's could get around that by performing the compression rotationally and thus centrifugally. The figure of merit would be, like fusion, how long can you run one of these things sustainably if mounted to an RC model. It would quickly vanish from radio contact, but you could use ham radio or ISM band frequencies and a larger antenna to track it.

  • @harrisonlichtenberg3162
    @harrisonlichtenberg3162 3 місяці тому

    How to cook tomatoes:
    Google: "Crush and simmer to make a sauce"
    Bing: *links you to this video*

  • @johnlynch-kv8mz
    @johnlynch-kv8mz Місяць тому

    7:28 I could like anime. I like your channel. You brighten what is inside my head with your clear explanations, and demonstrations.

  • @unvergebeneid
    @unvergebeneid Рік тому +16

    I kind of want to see more from this RDE guy. Super interesting subject and he's very engaging! Also that setup is absolutely rad!

  • @antonjeyaseelan2365
    @antonjeyaseelan2365 Рік тому +8

    Wow.!!! Now including interviews with scientists and engineers, shows how genuine your work is.
    Your humour is what makes your channel, pure class.
    I look forward to every post you do.

  • @yestfmf
    @yestfmf 5 місяців тому

    Playing with those primers….when I was 14 I played with shotgun primers. Ended up at the ER to remove the cap from my ankle. It had gone thru my shoe first.
    I told my parents a BS story about a nail. Then I ended my experiments. Not the first time (or the last) that I learned that some experiments are dangerous and painful.

  • @johnt8031
    @johnt8031 Рік тому +14

    I like how much he never lets anything get him down, he keeps saying n trying.. it’s great!

  • @poptimusoime9166
    @poptimusoime9166 Рік тому +6

    Did…did you just build a rocket motor that…actually worked?? As someone who’s been following your progress for a few years (or at least it feels like it) I am very happy and proud to see this

  • @sampleoffers1978
    @sampleoffers1978 9 днів тому

    Air to drive the combustion engine would be great on Earth and you don't need air jet that strong.

  • @imark7777777
    @imark7777777 6 місяців тому

    Erased is amazing and I've only seen parts of episodes. It's on my need to watch from beginning list.
    I almost immediately added it just from seeing a couple parts that is when I could take my eyes away from it.

  • @jakeking974
    @jakeking974 Рік тому +304

    I know it's probably unbelievably unsafe, but the human male inside me wants to see this made into a firework and see just how high this thing can go even at a microscale like you used. I bet it would be crazy amounts of initial thrust.

    • @TBButtSmoothy
      @TBButtSmoothy 9 місяців тому +11

      its funny. working on model rocketry, model rocket math is way more tedious and are way harder to manipulate than big ass rockets..

    • @crypticgamma6308
      @crypticgamma6308 8 місяців тому +7

      ​@@TBButtSmoothyas someone with no experience with any form of rocketry, going off of what you are saying, I'd imagine smaller scales mean higher precision and less margin for error.

    • @FleshWizard69420
      @FleshWizard69420 8 місяців тому +15

      "the human male inside me" _🤨_

    • @roedurham3499
      @roedurham3499 7 місяців тому

      This, forever!

    • @nikkiofthevalley
      @nikkiofthevalley 6 місяців тому +6

      @@crypticgamma6308 Yes, but that doesn't mean the math gets more complicated. The actual complexity is from all the small-scale effects that don't really do much at larger scales, but can cause massive issues at small scales.

  • @grinreaperoftrolls7528
    @grinreaperoftrolls7528 Рік тому +11

    You’re a massive inspiration. You make high level research accessible and understandable. Part of me wishes I was still in physics.

  • @ammarkhanx
    @ammarkhanx 8 місяців тому +1

    You can use a plasma vortex which spins around magnetic field of cylindrical magnet that way you’ll have high spinning rate plasma

    • @ammarkhanx
      @ammarkhanx 8 місяців тому

      Its exactly what you are looking for I suppose

    • @ammarkhanx
      @ammarkhanx 8 місяців тому

      And yes a reply would be fantastic and heartwarming ❤

  • @user-vv5xg9qi5i
    @user-vv5xg9qi5i 8 місяців тому

    Very interesting, maybe you could get that ignition to reach resonance with the chamber using a sound pressure sensor and an arduino

  • @cpoco
    @cpoco Рік тому +15

    Perhaps before things get (more) dangerous... an episode where you investigate the best blast protection solutions?

  • @vesstig
    @vesstig Рік тому +7

    I love watching the evolution of your content from your first engine tests, keep it up and the quality keeps getting better!

  • @jlfqam
    @jlfqam Місяць тому

    gunpowder burns in a deflagration, the shell primer explodes in a detonation, two different concepts or chemical processes. the former is a process involving different reactive substances, the latter is just an unstable molecule that decomposes into very stable, highly energetic low molecular weight gas molecules that expand violently and much faster than the reaction of several molecules, by the heat or shockwave from the primer The confetti inside the gun cartridge is in fact smokeless gunpowder which is actually nitro-cellulose. the detonation lacks the impulse needed to blast, push, etc., because the low mass production of gas molecules, while the deflagration or combustion, although slower, yields higher amounts of gases that, in a chain exothermic reaction build enough pressure to push whatever it's designed for.

  • @isbaccas
    @isbaccas 9 місяців тому

    The lab engine used a metal cap over the tube which forced the engine to decide it's rotation. With your engine you might get some rotation but you can't see it since the exit is a hole. you probably should try to restrict the exit point but then get ready to run. It will be like a bomb for real if you make the opening too small. I suggest trying to use the worse quality air for combustion so that it might have less force but you can abuse the cylinder more.

  • @joshuameldru4004
    @joshuameldru4004 Рік тому +13

    Great video and love the amount of interest you put into your projects. I’d suggest making some content on the study of electrostatics or for the Lehman the Wimshurst machine maybe also include fractal capacitors in it. I very much enjoy your studies on rocket propulsion, very cool and thanks for all of the hard work!

  • @joshuamiller2114
    @joshuamiller2114 Рік тому +7

    Thanks for propping up Erased, I was looking for something different to watch and this was incredible.

  • @josephhemberger3490
    @josephhemberger3490 5 місяців тому

    I really like your videos and I am curious if you could use the concept of a microwave emitter to create spiraling ignition for your thruster

  • @jameskreizel
    @jameskreizel 8 місяців тому

    I loved the rotation detention engine. I have an idea to make a radioscope generator but don't if it can be done

  • @urmum8540
    @urmum8540 Рік тому +6

    this is actually insane, ive been watching you religiously since you started, going from pulse jets to actually pushing forward hobby solid fuel rockets

  • @Fancysaurus
    @Fancysaurus Рік тому +4

    Just a note for future projects. Instead of harvesting primers from shotgun shells you can get what is essentially just the primer on its own. Its commonly used in some nail guns as a way to drive nails through harder materials. No clue if you need a special license for it where you live though.

  • @4DRC_
    @4DRC_ 5 місяців тому

    My man’s building a rocket to get as far away from tomatoes as possible

  • @Dimas_Lopes
    @Dimas_Lopes Місяць тому

    maybe you need to redesign the chamber if the waves are interfering with each other instead of resonating...it will be too hard to fine tune the air mixture flow

  • @jsteinfeld14
    @jsteinfeld14 Рік тому +12

    After you mentioning the RDE at the end of your last video I did a dive into the depths of UA-cam and watched way too much of a Thesis presentation on an RDE. I feel like with how difficult it is to manage this type of engine it would be great as an accelerator for space craft when beyond orbit. It allows extremely strong thrust at very quick reaction speeds when direction changes are needed.

    • @thefourthdymensionmusic
      @thefourthdymensionmusic Рік тому +1

      i feel like an engine large enough to lift a large space craft would probably cause some issues with the surrounding area during launch so that would have to be experimented with and tested. considering the one the two guys had built was strong enough to wreck havoc in a tiny metal room. definitely a really interesting idea though, and could possibly be implemented after contingency plans and side effect solutions are crafted.

    • @jsteinfeld14
      @jsteinfeld14 Рік тому +1

      @@thefourthdymensionmusic yeah I think I didn’t explain well enough or maybe you just misunderstood, I’m talking about engines for post orbital levels. An engine with this much power isn’t stable at long use times so using it in space rather than on earth makes more sense especially when sustained thrust isn’t required, having extremely powerful engines to make large velocity adjustments in a small time is valuable especially considering the efficiency. You can still use traditional small thrusters for fine adjustments when doing things like docking etc. and large traditional rockets for initial liftoff. We’ve found use cases for most types of engines and this one feels like it has a place just not one where it has to be used for long periods.

  • @chasethevioletsun9996
    @chasethevioletsun9996 Рік тому +9

    Thanks so much for this video. It's been my ambition to build a tiny RDE for a while now, and now I have a few critical questions answered and new resources I hadn't unearthed yet. Keep up the amazing work!!

  • @apophisstr6719
    @apophisstr6719 4 місяці тому

    Tomato: "What did I do that made me deserves such fate?"