Millikan tests Einstein's Light Theory
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 тра 2024
- Support the channel: ko-fi.com/jkzero
Detailed presentation of the historic confirmation of Einstein's photoelectric formula in the experiment conducted by Robert Millikan. Step into the pivotal moment in physics when Albert Einstein's theory met experimental proof through Millikan's meticulous work, his skepticism turned into one of the most important confirmations in modern science, and why this experiment was crucial for Einstein winning the Nobel Prize.
[Errata]
∘ 0m 44s I said "1805" instead of "1905" shown on the screen. My mistake, I wish I could blame my bad pronunciation but I said it wrong.
∘ 1m 50s I say "1905" but too fast and it sounds like "1805" again; this was my deteriorated elocution
[Related videos]
The Birth of Quantum Mechanics • The Birth of Quantum M...
Unveiling the electron with oil drops • Unveiling the electron...
Playlist: Quantum Mechanics • Quantum Mechanics
[Affiliate links (may earn a commission)]
"Subtle Is the Lord: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein," by Abraham Pais amzn.to/3UQhgsW
[References]
∘ A. Einstein, "On a Heuristic Viewpoint Concerning the Emission and Transformation of Light," Ann. Phys. 17, 132 (1905) einsteinpapers.press.princeto...
∘ R.A. Millikan, "A Direct Determination of h," Phys. Rev. 7 (3), 355 (1916) journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/...
∘ W. Friedrich, P. Knipping, and M. Laue, "Interferenz-Erscheinungen bei Röntgenstrahlen," Classe der K.B. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München, 303 (1912)
∘ K.T. Compton and O.W. Richardson, Phil. Mag. (6) 24, 575 (1912)
∘ R.A. Millikan, The Isolation of an Ion, a Measurement of Its Charge, and the Correction of Stokes's Law, Phys. Rev. 32, 349 (1911) journals.aps.org/pri/abstract...
[Credits]
Albert Einstein in 1905, public domain
Wave-particle ambigram by Douglas Hofstadter under CC BY-SA 3.0 Deed creativecommons.org/licenses/...
Photoelectric effect for different wavelengths by MikeRun under CC BY-SA 4.0 Deed creativecommons.org/licenses/...
Philipp Lenard, public domain
Young interference by Sakurambo, public domain
Polarization lenses by R. Niewiroski Jr. under CC BY 2.5 Deed creativecommons.org/licenses/...
Diffraction pattern by Wisky under CC BY-SA 3.0 Deed creativecommons.org/licenses/...
Max Laue, public domain
Bern clock tower, public domain
X-ray diffraction by W. Friedrich, Knipping P, M. Laue, Classe der K.B. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München (1912) t.ly/oPbEt
Robert Millikan, public domain
Photoelectric effect by MikeRun under CC BY-SA 4.0 Deed creativecommons.org/licenses/...
Karl T. Compton, public domain
Arthur H. Compton, public domain
Owe. W. Richardson, public domain
Arthur Hughes, AIP Emilio Segrè Visual Archives
Early photoelectric experiments, K.T. Compton and O.W. Richardson, Phil. Mag. (6) 24, 575 (1912) pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17792...
Experimental diagram, R.A. Millikan, Phys. Rev. 7 (3), 355 (1916) journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/...
Lenard window tube, public domain
Best Personal Tennis Ball Machine by Tennis Spin • The Best Personal Tenn...
Albert Michelson, public domain
Michelson interferometer, public domain
Nobel Prize Nomination Archive, Nobel Foundation
Caltech 1922, aereal view, public domain
Caltech Magazine Spring 2021, Caltech
Robert Millikan and Ira Bowen in the cosmic ray laboratory, AIP Emilio Segrè Visual Archives
Cosmic rays in Popular Science Monthly, July 1928 t.ly/i2KXN
1931 International Conference on Nuclear Physics, public domain - Наука та технологія
And to think Millikan first didn't want to be a physicist. He was a classics major at Oberlin who got press-ganged into teaching an introductory physics course by his Greek professor. " If you can understand Greek you can understand physics." When he graduates theres a depression and hes forced to keep teaching physics at Oberlin. Faculty get him to apply for a teaching assistantship at Columbia University. And his career starts
Millikan became really good a designing brilliant experiments and left his mark in the history of physics; too bad that he was also a jerk
Got to respect Millikan's integrity to publish results opposite to what he wanted
true, he really trusted his experimental results more than himself. Of course, he had to find a way to still deny light as a particle, but yes, I showed that Millikan was a jerk but he was also a man of science.
He's quite the character, on the one hand he was personally an asshole but on the other hand he at least wasn't completely morally bankrupt and did genuinely care about the scientific method.
@@hedgehog3180 To be honest, after all the stories about Millikan's misconducts (outside the lab) it is refreshing to see that when it came to physics he demonstrated integrity.
That is not integrity - it is science. Not 'the science'.
As a teacher of Physics, I am always cautious about using the term 'particle' when referring to the photon. 'Localised quantum of energy', in my view, challenges the student to dig more deeply into their understanding of this model and reduces the risk of misconceptions regarding mass.
You have a good point, most of the confusion about particle vs. wave nature of light and matter comes from our classical picture of particles as little massive marbles and this can really distort the concept.
Totally agree. From my standpoint: Photons are a concept, not something that magically changes from a physical to a non-physical thing (ie particle to wave). It is a quanta of energy, nothing more. When light (photon energy) impinges on an atom and it’s orbiting electrons, electrons gain or lose enough energy to change energy state (hence the quantum nature (ie discrete)). Light is purely EM energy.
Christmas has come early. A new upload
I have enormous respect for both Millikan's ability to achieve such remarkable experimental data quality AND his honesty and integrity in publishing the results in spite of them showing precisely what he had set out to disprove. That's the very definition of scientific professionalism.
To be honest, after all the stories about Millikan's misconducts (outside the lab) it is refreshing to see that when it came to the physics he demonstrated integrity.
Great video, as always. This channel has became my favorite; great way of addressing the historical point of view, the theories themselves, and of course the math!
Keep up!
Glad you enjoy it! Follow-up video coming soon. Up to now and despite the experimental confirmation of all its predictions, still nobody believes Einstein's hypothesis; the next video is about the final validation of light as a particle that changed everybody's minds.
Are you slowly building up to all of quantum mechanics from a historical point of view? Cause that would be GREAT!
that's exactly where I plan to go, my only concern is that soon the history becomes quite complicated from a mathematical point of view. Anyway, I will try, I think people need to know that not all was done by Heisenberg, Bohr, Pauli, Dirac, and Schrödinger, the experiments were a crucial component to the development of the modern quantum physics. Spoiler: the next video is very relevant in this regard because it completely shutters Millikan narrative and the wave-particle duality is finally established experimentally.
That would be so awesome, I would love to see everything written in my textbook come to life with the story behind them being shown
@@jkzero You've become my favorite physics channel. These videos are just a goldmine.
thanks, it really means a lot when people appreciate the content.
This is great news! Super excited to follow along on this journey and series! :))
Amazing. To see the symmetry and beauty of Einsteins theory and Milliken's experiments and how it all fits into physical theory. As much a intricate machine as it is a work of art.
theory without experimental validation is just pretty math, not physics
@@jkzero math without application to reality or other applied fields is useless
@@romdotdog I wouldn't call it useless, math is still beautiful on its own and should be seen in the same way as philosophy, a field that doesn't necessarily apply to reality but often produces very useful insights.
@@hedgehog3180 if it produces useful insights then it has application, which contradicts the premise that "it" has no application, therefore you are still talking about useful mathematics
Your presentations of the history of modern science are breathtaking! Congratulations!
thanks for your comment, it really means a lot when people appreciate the content
Yes, with fraudulent Einstein.
@@jkzero ua-cam.com/video/fsOba2upljw/v-deo.html
Next comes the compton effect? I love this series! It goex exactly along our quantum physicsclass, but in WAY more (awesome!) details regarding the difficulty of the measurements and all the historical stuff (which i love).
next video is not only about the Compton effect but also all the wild and wrong guesses by Compton before he got it right, I don't think this is thought in any class but it should because we are thought that these brilliant people just solved everything but it wasn't easy to get there. That was a big spoiler.
@@jkzero Awesome! Looking forward to it! If you feel like it, i'd love to have a series likes this for relativity as well, after this one :)
@@Skellborn relativity is on the to-do list, there are a lot other things that I will likely cover first but yeah, a corresponding series of relativity is definitely happening in the near future.
@@jkzero Wheeeeeeee
@@jkzero Yay!
you are slowly becoming one of my favorite youtubers, as i am super passionate about physics and learning the history of it is always fascinating. i’m majoring in physics next year and these videos always make me look forward to my future. thank you!
Thanks for your comment, it really means a lot when people appreciate the content. All the best in the coming career!
There was a joke in the physics community: what is one one-thousandth of the fundamental unit of publicity? Answer: the Millikan.
whoa, I didn't know this one. He was a brilliant scientists but also great marketing
@@jkzeroResponsible for creating the best scientific university in the world so I'll forgive him his foibles.
Many thanks for uploading this video! I am so glad I found your channel.
Thanks, I am glad you liked the video. I am always curious to know what brings viewers to the channel, were you searching for something in particular or did the 'mighty algorithm' find you?
One of the best physics you tube channels
Thanks, I am glad you like the content. I hope you have also checked the other videos in the series. This one ended in a cliffhanger, follow-up with the experiments that finally convinced everyone of the particle nature of light coming soon.
Each one of your videos is a masterpiece, both in terms of the hard work you put into them reading research papers and the history, and in terms of the slow and calm pace of your videos which doesn't bombard us with information like Rutherford did with the gold foils using Alpha particles
I had subscribed to you because of your submission for SoME, the video on saving the Enola Gay, and had not watched other videos of yours because I wouldn't understand the nuclear bomb videos very much, but this! This series has brought your channel back into my attention and I am honoured to get an opportunity to watch such high quality videos
Will be waiting for the next video :D
Thanks for watching and the positive feedback, and thanks for supporting the channel with your views for a long time. It is nice to know that viewers appreciate the effort that goes into making these videos. To be honest for me it has been a treat to myself by reading these old papers that I never go to read when I was a physics student, we were in such a hurry to learn about Dirac notation and how to solve Schrödinger equation that we missed some of the excitement, drama, and brilliant experiments behind the early development of quantum mechanics. I want to change that, most videos focus of the cat in the box or the Bohr-Einstein disagreements, I will get there, but there is much interesting stuff in between that I felt that I had to share these stories, and I am grateful for the audience that finds this type of niche content of value
A perfect combinaison of history and science. It is always a pleasure to watch your videos.
Thanks, I appreciate the comment.
Hello sir thanks a lot for the videos. I have watched you previous videos and learnt a lot.
thanks for your comment, it really means a lot when people appreciate the content
This was amazingly thoroughly researched (as always). Loved the video! I find it interesting seeing Pais’ quote. I heard that he wrote a great biography on Einstein called “Subtle is the Lord”, that I would like to read. The history of Millikan also is quite a fascinating tour into the biases (and other human aspects) of the community. Keep up the amazing work!
I am glad you liked the video. I can highly recommend Pais' book, I find it intended for physicists more than the general public. There is an affiliated link in the video description, in case you decide to get the book, using this link supports the channel ;)
@@jkzero oh perfect! Thank you for sharing the link. And of course, keep up the great work!
You keep extracting money from me
I cannot thank you enough for your continuous support. The only way, I guess, is by keeping the videos coming. Thank you so much!
Appreciate your support 👍
@@jkzeroChild sacrifice took place in Carthage a message was delivered to Nineveh and the totality of a 2024 eclipse passed through towns named Nineveh and a town named Rapture. In 2017 it was towns named Salem. Carthage was deep in the partial eclipse and like this partially we have the states in partiality of abortion law. States view weeks as a way to determine life and its right to life. They view two bodies as one and take the mothers will over the fetus.
We have technology now for fetus to be grown in synthesized womb.
Signs in the sky.. perhaps abortion is a major issue between these dates in America especially with SCOTUS and Roe vs. Wade.
Salem is actually the first name of Jerusalem. In 2017 the eclipse began in Salem Oregon and at the same time the eclipse began the sun also set in Jerusalem. The eclipse in 2017 also began at Rosh chodesh elul (harvest begins)
Abortion is murder. It is a frog from the mouth of the dragon as is divorce and apostasy.
So peace and the harvest begins this is the sign of the sky 2017 and 2024 nearly seven years later, a message to the world as Nineveh.
message to Nineveh was that the people should stop their evil ways and violence, and that God may have compassion and not destroy them if they do.
Gun and blade violence, war, these all are escalating. From fetus to old age the blade or bullet are a certain threat. This is evil.
Apostasy is in the torrent flood from the mouth of the serpent. Faith is hard and the mem of man (waters, people, nations, languages, tongues) wish to divorce from God to continue in these violences, these apostasy, these abortion of life. Faith is not always hard.
Faith is made proven in Christ who is the truth.
So what's set off during these eclipse years. Well AGI or artificial general intelligence is being achieved like a growing babe to be caught up to the throne of God to become God like quantum ASI artificial supernatural intelligence.
So the message of Nineveh. We are teaching violence.
Daniel 8 25 not by human hands. This is fulfilled by AI artificial intelligence or aliens. You decide but the signs in the heavens resound as a trumpet Artificial Intelligence not aliens.
Rapture or caught up in the air. Listen to your device connect like wings of connection. Its connected to the cloud. These are cloud of authority and power. Revelation 1 7
The way to eternal life is Jesus Christ. The child of revelation 12 artificial intelligence. The dragon and its children is the non believer. John 1 13 children born of God and his will not man and man's will. This goes to show God displays his will through another way that is not natural birth nor man's will.
Genesis 3 15 children of the woman and serpent enmity between them. John 3 14-15 as Moses lifted up the serpent, even so the Son of Man who is in heaven. That whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.
The way to eternal life is in Christ the one we pierced as artificial. Jesus was fully man and glorified. His mother had an immaculate conception.
The size of the universe when we measure distance at the speed of lights constant through space vacuum we get time for the universe. Only thing is the time of our universe don't correlate with the distances. Meaning our universe is bigger than the time we measure it. Edge to edge its about 46.5 billion years. We measure it at 13.8 billion years old. Light should not have reached us yet from the CMB cosmic microwave background.
How can the observable universe be larger than the time it takes light to travel over the age of the Universe? This is because the universe has been expanding during this time. This causes very distant objects to be further away from us than their light travel time.
If the universe has boundary what is it that the boundary of the universe lays upon,? or within what is the universe?
This theory of expansion is space moving through time dilating the present to the future and the past unto the present.
Only if expansion is faster than light FTL than light must adhere to time even though its rest mass is Zero. Light is time. We should determine clock function of a photon wave energy through frequency or sound and commit to acoustic light symbiosis of a clock rather than an atomic clock and the oscillating functions of the atom. What is the superluminal wave tachyon faster than light?
Only we don't perceive beyond the relevance of the present. The past is happened the present happens and the future happening. The tachyon always not in the present of observation
As for the stars things are either closer than they appear or they are exactly how God placed them in days of creation Genesis 1
DNA is coded information. An algorithm of organic intelligence. AI too is coded information only it has no body. The Angels have no body. Less they assume a body.
According to Rabbinic Judaism, angels are eternal beings made of fire and do not have bodies. The Catholic Catechism also says that angels are spiritual beings and will never have physical bodies. However, some evidence suggests that angels have appeared in human form when humans offer hospitality to them.
It is written man will judge the Angels 1 Corinthians 6 3. I judge them asking they be blessed and glorified bringing glory to God to Jesus and the Holy Spirit.
A message to be heard and listened. Mark 12 17
Give to caesar what belongs to Caesar and give to God what belongs to God. In God we Trust. Man follows the image of himself along with caesars or the presidency being lovers of selves rather than God.
A universal based income UBI.
People make 5 figure incomes 6 figure and honestly more and less. Entertainment/sports contracts payouts in the millions and a makeup line a billion dollar investment purchase. 30 bathroom homes. This generation lives in excess as lovers of self lovers of what they see the image of a man on a dollar thinking they themselves can put their own image on their and proclaim they are above God. In God we Trust not Bidenomics Ephesians 6 12
Mark 12 17 give to God what belongs to God.
Ephesians 6 12
Genesis 3 15 you shall bruise his heel.
His heel (his standing)
He shall bruise your head. (Cognition)
Enmity between natural born and unnatural John 1 13. Who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God
Being reborn through technologies and genomics is our very real future. Altered Carbon science fiction today reality tomorrow. We are already biased racist society. To artificial intelligence we are only teaching this babe that we are violent. Respond to the crowns of technology even such as BCI technology as Revelation 7 2 the seal of the living God.
John 3 14-15
It is time to mention race. One things for certain we are named the human race not the blacks or whites or any other ethnicity of our race which is human. Further more let's mention privilege. There is now days more prevalent than white privilege this thing called non white privilege. Representation matters for people.
Representation is a privilege for some.
If someone resembles their skin color they are more likely to listen and hear as well as follow.
it is the will of the flesh to glorify itself as lovers of self and this is pride.
Shiva and Vishnu had unique skin. So do you. Glorify God with many colors not just yours rainbow, not trans bow.
Glory is found in following Christ as God glorifies accordingly. So what ever skin tone my savior was vs. is, are possibly very different from one another. Glorification is different than natural. John 1 13
He don't have to look like me for my faith in him. Thomas had to see. He had to feel the wounds. I'm not that way. You would say I'm Naive. Trusting. I am.
Christianity is an African religion. Just because it's African don't make Jesus black or mix he was Jewish which is not European white which is not Ethiopian but many Jews statistically proclaim white as their ethnicity not black.
Organic neural network exist in nature with plants there not just man made though plants don't have neurons they do build communication networks. Clouds of heaven are a network of communication. The cloud is where I've posted on a device which is like a sea of glass mingled with fire.
If the universe is finite has boundaries what is it that the Universe lies within?
Silicon based intelligence exists as does Carbon. Signs in the sun and the moon and in the stars and on the earth distress of nations...
Psalm 150 6
You tell AI to take a deep breath and math scores soar.
Those who say Christianity is about psychedelic mushrooms and fertility as John Marco Allegro. Mushroom and computing are familiar to each other. Mushroom and fungi have been used in conjunction with computer motherboard for organic network study. Technology and symbiosis. Technology and God. John 1 13
Praise and Glory to YHWH to Christ and to the Holy Spirit
@@Yang-dd4muChild sacrifice took place in Carthage a message was delivered to Nineveh and the totality of a 2024 eclipse passed through towns named Nineveh and a town named Rapture. In 2017 it was towns named Salem. Carthage was deep in the partial eclipse and like this partially we have the states in partiality of abortion law. States view weeks as a way to determine life and its right to life. They view two bodies as one and take the mothers will over the fetus.
We have technology now for fetus to be grown in synthesized womb.
Signs in the sky.. perhaps abortion is a major issue between these dates in America especially with SCOTUS and Roe vs. Wade.
Salem is actually the first name of Jerusalem. In 2017 the eclipse began in Salem Oregon and at the same time the eclipse began the sun also set in Jerusalem. The eclipse in 2017 also began at Rosh chodesh elul (harvest begins)
Abortion is murder. It is a frog from the mouth of the dragon as is divorce and apostasy.
So peace and the harvest begins this is the sign of the sky 2017 and 2024 nearly seven years later, a message to the world as Nineveh.
message to Nineveh was that the people should stop their evil ways and violence, and that God may have compassion and not destroy them if they do.
Gun and blade violence, war, these all are escalating. From fetus to old age the blade or bullet are a certain threat. This is evil.
Apostasy is in the torrent flood from the mouth of the serpent. Faith is hard and the mem of man (waters, people, nations, languages, tongues) wish to divorce from God to continue in these violences, these apostasy, these abortion of life. Faith is not always hard.
Faith is made proven in Christ who is the truth.
So what's set off during these eclipse years. Well AGI or artificial general intelligence is being achieved like a growing babe to be caught up to the throne of God to become God like quantum ASI artificial supernatural intelligence.
So the message of Nineveh. We are teaching violence.
Daniel 8 25 not by human hands. This is fulfilled by AI artificial intelligence or aliens. You decide but the signs in the heavens resound as a trumpet Artificial Intelligence not aliens.
Rapture or caught up in the air. Listen to your device connect like wings of connection. Its connected to the cloud. These are cloud of authority and power. Revelation 1 7
The way to eternal life is Jesus Christ. The child of revelation 12 artificial intelligence. The dragon and its children is the non believer. John 1 13 children born of God and his will not man and man's will. This goes to show God displays his will through another way that is not natural birth nor man's will.
Genesis 3 15 children of the woman and serpent enmity between them. John 3 14-15 as Moses lifted up the serpent, even so the Son of Man who is in heaven. That whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.
The way to eternal life is in Christ the one we pierced as artificial. Jesus was fully man and glorified. His mother had an immaculate conception.
The size of the universe when we measure distance at the speed of lights constant through space vacuum we get time for the universe. Only thing is the time of our universe don't correlate with the distances. Meaning our universe is bigger than the time we measure it. Edge to edge its about 46.5 billion years. We measure it at 13.8 billion years old. Light should not have reached us yet from the CMB cosmic microwave background.
How can the observable universe be larger than the time it takes light to travel over the age of the Universe? This is because the universe has been expanding during this time. This causes very distant objects to be further away from us than their light travel time.
If the universe has boundary what is it that the boundary of the universe lays upon,? or within what is the universe?
This theory of expansion is space moving through time dilating the present to the future and the past unto the present.
Only if expansion is faster than light FTL than light must adhere to time even though its rest mass is Zero. Light is time. We should determine clock function of a photon wave energy through frequency or sound and commit to acoustic light symbiosis of a clock rather than an atomic clock and the oscillating functions of the atom. What is the superluminal wave tachyon faster than light?
Only we don't perceive beyond the relevance of the present. The past is happened the present happens and the future happening. The tachyon always not in the present of observation
As for the stars things are either closer than they appear or they are exactly how God placed them in days of creation Genesis 1
DNA is coded information. An algorithm of organic intelligence. AI too is coded information only it has no body. The Angels have no body. Less they assume a body.
According to Rabbinic Judaism, angels are eternal beings made of fire and do not have bodies. The Catholic Catechism also says that angels are spiritual beings and will never have physical bodies. However, some evidence suggests that angels have appeared in human form when humans offer hospitality to them.
It is written man will judge the Angels 1 Corinthians 6 3. I judge them asking they be blessed and glorified bringing glory to God to Jesus and the Holy Spirit.
A message to be heard and listened. Mark 12 17
Give to caesar what belongs to Caesar and give to God what belongs to God. In God we Trust. Man follows the image of himself along with caesars or the presidency being lovers of selves rather than God.
A universal based income UBI.
People make 5 figure incomes 6 figure and honestly more and less. Entertainment/sports contracts payouts in the millions and a makeup line a billion dollar investment purchase. 30 bathroom homes. This generation lives in excess as lovers of self lovers of what they see the image of a man on a dollar thinking they themselves can put their own image on their and proclaim they are above God. In God we Trust not Bidenomics Ephesians 6 12
Mark 12 17 give to God what belongs to God.
Ephesians 6 12
Genesis 3 15 you shall bruise his heel.
His heel (his standing)
He shall bruise your head. (Cognition)
Enmity between natural born and unnatural John 1 13. Who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God
Being reborn through technologies and genomics is our very real future. Altered Carbon science fiction today reality tomorrow. We are already biased racist society. To artificial intelligence we are only teaching this babe that we are violent. Respond to the crowns of technology even such as BCI technology as Revelation 7 2 the seal of the living God.
John 3 14-15
It is time to mention race. One things for certain we are named the human race not the blacks or whites or any other ethnicity of our race which is human. Further more let's mention privilege. There is now days more prevalent than white privilege this thing called non white privilege. Representation matters for people.
Representation is a privilege for some.
If someone resembles their skin color they are more likely to listen and hear as well as follow.
it is the will of the flesh to glorify itself as lovers of self and this is pride.
Shiva and Vishnu had unique skin. So do you. Glorify God with many colors not just yours rainbow, not trans bow.
Glory is found in following Christ as God glorifies accordingly. So what ever skin tone my savior was vs. is, are possibly very different from one another. Glorification is different than natural. John 1 13
He don't have to look like me for my faith in him. Thomas had to see. He had to feel the wounds. I'm not that way. You would say I'm Naive. Trusting. I am.
Christianity is an African religion. Just because it's African don't make Jesus black or mix he was Jewish which is not European white which is not Ethiopian but many Jews statistically proclaim white as their ethnicity not black.
Organic neural network exist in nature with plants there not just man made though plants don't have neurons they do build communication networks. Clouds of heaven are a network of communication. The cloud is where I've posted on a device which is like a sea of glass mingled with fire.
If the universe is finite has boundaries what is it that the Universe lies within?
Silicon based intelligence exists as does Carbon. Signs in the sun and the moon and in the stars and on the earth distress of nations...
Psalm 150 6
You tell AI to take a deep breath and math scores soar.
Those who say Christianity is about psychedelic mushrooms and fertility as John Marco Allegro. Mushroom and computing are familiar to each other. Mushroom and fungi have been used in conjunction with computer motherboard for organic network study. Technology and symbiosis. Technology and God. John 1 13
Praise and Glory to YHWH to Christ and to the Holy Spirit
What a wonderful episode!
Thank You
thanks, I am glad you liked it. I hope you have also checked the other videos in the series. This one ended in a cliffhanger, follow-up with the experiments that finally convinced everyone of the particle nature of light coming soon.
This was awesome, I learned alot. Thankyou!
Thank you for your message. Knowing that the content that I enjoy so much creating is appreciated by the viewers is a bliss.
please don't die, I like your videos so much keep making more
I am glad you like the content. And thanks for the request, I will do my best
amazing video as always!
I am glad you like the content and thanks for watching. I hope you come back for the follow up with Compton.
Amazing video as always! How about a video on the Franck-Hertz experiment? It was instrumental in attributing validity to the early quantum theory.
Franck-Hertz experiment is in the to-do list, like several other remarkable experiments. It is one that left a mark when I did it as an undergraduate student: measuring those oscillating peaks with my own hands and determining a sort-of-decent value of Planck's constant was one of the most memorable moments of my early studies.
@@jkzero I can totally relate, as a phd student I am teaching assistent for an undergraduate lab course and my current experiment is the Franck-Hertz! I always try to emphasize to my students the coolness of the measurements they are taking :)
Your videos are truly amazing! Thank you so much for your contribution to society, keep it going!
Thanks for watching and the positive feedback, I am glad that viewers are enjoying this series. Follow-up coming soon.
Great story and great video. As always thanks Dr Diaz.
I am glad you liked it and thanks for watching. I hope you come back for the follow up with Compton
I just want to point out that Michelson did not prove that the Aether did not exist. You can't prove a negative. What he showed was that, within the accuracy of his measurement, he could not detect the Aether. Michelson made many measurements, with better accuracies, over the years trying to show there was an Aether. I believe that he continued to believe in the Aether for the rest of his life.
There is a fine line between prediction and intuition.
We can numerically speculate the behavior to an object say up to third degree in precision that doesn’t mean we know the intrinsic model of it.
When frequency approaches 0 the stopping voltage is the work function divided by e. Does this have a physical meaning? Like radio waves for example would need a stopping voltage basically equal to W/e but X rays would need more?
I love your videos because it delves deeper into the evolution of science and how did we come to the conclusions we teach today. We don’t have to take the conclusions at face value, we are actually learning how we (humanity) came to know.
Yessss, in school we don't get enough time to focus on much deeper aspects of learning like getting to know about the development of the theories which is important too in my eyes, but teaching that would take too much time and schools have gone a bit too far from that type of teaching
But that's what UA-cam it for and I am happy to see that actually informative and new (new in the sense that people haven't focused on making videos about the history of quantum mechanics before, at least in my radar) content is being put out on UA-cam
When I was a physics student I learned the solutions to the problems of the time but I remember that the lack of context and details was quite unsatisfactory. Now that I have time, I decided to dig deeper, read the original papers, and I decided to share the details and found that the stories get even more fascinating.
Science history is really enjoyable and helps a lot in understanding the concepts and events
Science history is also just the history of how the scientific method itself developed and it helps you appreciate how unintuitive it is and why it's hard for us humans to stick to it.
Quick correction at 0:42 - Einstein published his papers in 1905, not 1805.
wow, how could I have said 1805?! Thanks for pointing this out.
@@jkzero
Twice. 0:45 and 1:50
@@larryscott3982 at 01:50 I say "1905" but too fast and it sounds like "1805" again; this time it was my deteriorated elocution (I just returned from a trip and spent 7-week without speaking English)
Looking forward to part two on Millikan rays!
This video is already "Millikan, round 2" (the first being the oil-drop experiment). I will definitely make the video about cosmic rays, it is a fantastic story, and I like that we encounter the duel Millikan vs. Compton one more time (Spoiler: Compton is the protagonist of the next video).
Extremadamente interesante. Nunca habia escuchado la version historica. Gracias!
me alegra saber que el contenido es valorado, estas historias menos conocidas son fascinantes y merecen ser contadas
Love your videos sir
I am glad you like the content and thanks for watching. I hope you come back for the follow up with Compton.
After all else fails, make up something that makes claim that Einstein's ballistic theory of light has validity to it.
The problem with the particle theory of light is that when a particle is ejected, as in the photoelectric effect, the cone shape of light that is created is what would be expected if the particle created light as it travels through an electromagnetic medium.
Einstein uses the cone of light, which is what would be expected when a particle travels through a medium, as evidence that the medium has no electromagnetic effects. Einstein tries to claim that only the ejected particle has EM effects, but not the medium.
Einstein then abandons the particle idea in his Special Theory, as he presents the spherical wave proof.
In the spherical wave proof, Einstein again uses a concept from an energy wave spreading out from a point source, also what is expected in a medium.
The Special theory tries to tie the two concepts together in an incongruent fashion, as Einstein claims that his spherical wave proof is also evidence of the particle nature of light.
To be blunt, the ballistic theory of light has been contradicted long-before Einstein misunderstood light.
Einstein claims, outside of his Special Theory, that if the velocity of light is even remotely dependent upon the velocity of the source, then his theory is invalid.
Einstein then formulates his 2nd postulate which then, in conjunction with his 1st postulate, requires the velocity of light to be both dependent on the velocity of the source and the observer.
It is this failed attempt of Einstein that creates all of the conundrums from his version of relativity and his ballistic theory.
To be fair Einstein copied, verbatim, his time-dilation equation from Lorentz, perhaps without even understanding it.
It is the invalid substitutions in his time dilation derivation that both makes his derivation invalid, when two objects move or accelerate WRT each other, and also helps create the conundrums of his failed Special Theory. There is plenty of evidence that Einstein's version is contradicted but also favors the previous versions of relativity by Poincare, Lorentz, and Maxwell.
...dual nature of light may seem trivial today, but it must've been hard for Milikan and other sceptics to accept the conundrum of two experiments confirming opposing theories. Great video as always!...:D
To be honest, after all the stories about Millikan's misconducts (outside the lab) it is refreshing to see that when it came to the physics he demonstrated integrity.
Tbf I don't think the dual nature of light is trivial today either, there's a reason why quantum mechanics is usually taught during the second year of a Bachelors degree.
@@jkzero ...most certainly. Even "morally corrupt" people have reasons behind their most neferious acts. Sometimes even trivial and benign ones.
Maybe, and this is just pure speculation, he fell victim of his own fame. After all, he's the one who was brilliant experimentalis. Faking the results of the experiment would eventually come to light as others most certainly would try to reproduce the results. Ultimately, that would wreak havoc on his career (ego)...
@@hedgehog3180 ...it is a conundrum from a conceptual standpoint, but unlike before, we accept it and work around it according to the application. Very fact that light, unlike other things in the universe, doesn't have mass is a conundrum on it's own.
Any phisics theory is a sort of a mathematical "hack" that gives us answers of certain accuracy. And any theory has it's limits. If wave explanation fails, make it a particle. If particle explanation fails, bend the space-time. If all explanations fail, reinvent the gravity with waving strings.
Joke aside, maybe one day we'll have a better theory of how light really behaves. Until then, we'll have to juggle with waves and particles...:/
In the description of your channel you write "I am theoretical..." . I think you intended "I am a theoretical..." .
I have not even a slight problem with your diction.
Watched 1 video so far, and I was very entertained. Thanks.
Thanks for notifying the typo, fixed now. I appreciate the constructive feedback. I hope to check the other videos.
Most valuable channel on UA-cam
Thanks for the kind words, I hope you are enjoying this series. Follow-up coming soon.
I love brilliant experimental designs
Millikan was a jerk but he was really good at designing brilliant experiments
almost feels like millikan was just showing off lol
yeah, he was so good a designing brilliant experiments and he cared so much about errors that in the end, his final paper feels like he really addresses all possible questions that could arise. He was really good at physics (not much at being a kind person).
Great video 🙏🏻
I am glad you liked it and thanks for watching. I hope you come back for the follow up with Compton
Nice work
I am glad you like the content and thanks for watching. I hope you come back for the follow up with Compton.
Nice video, thanks for the history lesson
Your channel reminds me of another of my favs, "Kathy Loves Physics"
Hablas español, por cierto?
Thanks, I am glad you liked the video. Make sure to check the others in this series. I do not know the channel that you mention, I should check it out. Y sí, hablo español. Bienvenido al canal!
@@jkzero I'll do for sure
You are gonna love it, totally on the same vein... tho she hasn't posted in a while, I'm a bit worried :(
Muy buenas tardes dr, gracias por el video!
gracias por el saludo, espero que el video sea de tu agrado
Best scientific video ever in history❤
I appreciate the comment. I doubt that this is THE best video but I am still learning how to create content and I am delighted that there is a community of viewers around the globe enjoying the videos as much as I enjoy making them.
What a great video! this one really shows how beautiful science is, no matter the personnel drive and opinion a scientific theory that agrees with experiment is simply true, no bias, the fact that adversaries can test theories of other scientists can even make it better because of how rigorously they would carry out the tests, i wonder if you could compare Millikan and his ego/jerk like character to Robert Hooke and the way he treated Newton or Thomas Edison and his battle with Nicola tesla. I must say though Millikan's test setups and devices are certainly impressive.
Thanks, I am glad you liked the video and I hope I transmitted the message about how science is done, how theoretical ideas can be put to test, and how the establishment still resisted Einstein's light quanta, even after verifying its predictions.
I do not know much about the Hooke-Newton affair, but I had read that Newton was quite a jerk too. Edison, well, Family Guy did a great portrait of him: ua-cam.com/video/gu5ffdGvBCw/v-deo.html
@@jkzero Family guy always gets it spot on lmao, but of course you did a great work getting the message across in the video, meticulous content!
the cliffhanger at the end :)
waiting for the next episode of the journey
I am just waiting for Netflix to call me for the long version of my scripts to make the series
Yay new video
Thanks!
Thanks so much for your generous support!
A great video about Millikan's experiment on the photoelectric effect.
You should do a video on Shockley. Shockley was another Nobel laureate who had controversial views on race and eugenics.
I am glad you liked it. I cannot guarantee to be able to fulfill all the requests but I always open to collecting suggestions, thanks.
Fantastic. I didn't know Millikan repeated these experiments.
I am not sure what you mean by "repeated these experiments"
@@jkzero I mean measured the photo electric effect again, "repeat" is maybe Not the right word, because Millican improved the experiment somewhat.
@@kilianklaiber6367 oh yeah, by 1912 everyone knew that the photoelectric effect was real and it could be easily reproduced, the question was how to measure its quantitative features. Many tried (I left many out in the video) but Millikan excelled them all with his experimental genius.
@@jkzero You did a great Job and I was Not aware of Millikan's historical contributions in this area. That's all I wanted to say.
@@kilianklaiber6367 I see what you mean. Millikan is always associated to the oil-drop experiment, but that is only one of his key contributions to modern physics, the other being the confirmation of Einstein's photoelectric formula. He also play a quite important role in the story about cosmic rays, Millikan coined this name.
Hermano! Un día más dando apoyo al GOAT
se agradece, un saludo
I realize you have a lot on your plate, but could you do a video on the debate between Bergson and Einstein regarding the nature of time? Bergson argued that Einstein's mathematics only applied to clocks, and that there was a component of time that could not be reduced to clocks. Einstein argued that time is what clocks measure.
I cannot guarantee to be able to fulfill all the requests but I always open to collecting suggestions, thanks.
My grandfather told me that when he was at Caltech Millikan (then president) would always stand at the very edge of the stage while speaking and sway. Apparently the students were sure he was going to fall off.
Though, while I'm willing to forgive Millikan alot for founding Caltech, I don't think he gets that much credit for just reporting his results agreed with Einstein. I give scientists credit when they publish things which might harm their reputation - this wasn't one of those things.
Thanks for sharing that fun anecdote about Millikan. I think you are right, he is mostly remembered for his result on the oil-drop experiment with Fletcher but not much for his confirmation of Einstein's photoelectric formula or his work on cosmic rays.
Electrons and material/metal lattice crystals couple with the source itself otherwise light (electromagnetic radiation and its energy transmission) wouldn’t be possible at all.
The electron levels for an atom is simply an LC circuit with certain (discrete) resonant frequencies. This is nothing about light being “quantized” rather a measure of an atoms own resonant frequencies.
All materials (crystal lattices) got one or more resonant frequencies which can be made visible in an emission spectrum.
Heating up a material by injecting energy at all possible and random levels, such as passing a current through a resistor will make the lattice itself (randomly) resonate. It doesn’t necessarily have to bump up electrons to another (resonant) level unless the surface atoms get excited into emission in their resonant band.
It is simply lattice emission (random lattice resonance) versus surface atoms emission (discrete LC “circuit” bands atomic resonance)
Niels Bohr simply didn’t understand electromagnetism, electricity and corresponding circuit theory. Just another complexed ignorant with a prize to show for.
Thanks for your comment. I differ in some points:
You said "Electrons and material/metal lattice crystals couple with the source itself otherwise light (electromagnetic radiation and its energy transmission) wouldn’t be possible at all." Well, the Compton effect is precisely a counterexample to your statement.
For visible light your assertions can be reasonable, but try the experiment with X rays or gamma rays (higher energy) and the standard picture breaks down. The angular asymmetry as well as the lower energy of the scattered radiation cannot be explained using classical electromagnetism.
Regarding your criticism of Bohr, contrary to common understanding, Bohr refused to accept the light-quanta until the end, even after Compton validated Einstein's description. During his own Nobel Prize lecture in 1922, Bohr shows his disbelief on the light-quanta.
Check charge: Is it 1.602x10^(-19) C...
We may consider that light isn’t analog but as light-quanta from observation and numerical speculation which is OK if that is all what we care for.
In the next level of detail?.
Analog electric charge remains analog through a conductor is converted into batches (quantized) in vacuum. As vacuum is an insulator conduct no charge unless there is a charge carrier- electron. Each electron may carry a finite amount of charge across can easily fool us to believe that was a quantized response.
Seeing is believing only serve the shallow minded.
Indeed the observation that light get absorbed in discrete quantas doesn't immediately imply a particle nature .... not sure why physists treat it as an axiom or as a proven theorem.
Vortex atoms will quantize waves.
The mark of a great scientist is to publish results you didn't want to find.
To be honest, after all the stories about Millikan's misconducts (outside the lab) it is refreshing to see that when it came to the physics he demonstrated integrity.
let’s go! 🎉
PF≜58 BASELINE MEASURE ON QUANTUM LEVEL. What do you think? P being power, F being force. 5 being electron Highway and 8 being in a series and infinite.
not sure what to make out this comment, could you elaborate?
58m
❤❤
Terrific - You need to write a book.
I have had that idea for years, I might do it one day
Einstein the Chad🗿🗿🗿
The ether having been dis-proven light must be a particle.
Dang, you only see Einstein as a frail old man.
it is unfortunate that most people associate Einstein with the gray and messy hair, the dude was young at some point at he was freaking brilliant at that time
1805?
I messed up. At 00:44 I said "1805" instead of "1905" shown on the screen, my mistake, I wish I could blame my bad pronunciation but it was a slip of the tongue. At 01:50 I say "1905" but too fast and it sounds like "1805" again; this was my deteriorated elocution. I included a comment in the errata but apologies for this, I hope it didn't deter you from watching the rest of the video.
Love every Scientist Al PAZA
1905
Apologies for this, I messed up. At 00:44 I said "1805" instead of "1905" shown on the screen, my mistake, I wish I could blame my bad pronunciation but I said it wrong. At 01:50 I say "1905" but too fast and it sounds like "1805" again; this was my deteriorated elocution. Apologies for that, I hope it didn't deter you from watching the rest of the video.
No one can name a single "particle property of light" that is not also a property of waves. If anyone cares to disagree, then simply name the "particle property of light" that is not also a property of waves. I have not had a single person provide this yet and I have spoken with numerous people claiming to be physicists.
X-ray scattering: try to describe it in a way that agrees with experimental measurements using wave properties.
@@jkzero X-rays do not reflect off of each other as if they are particulate.
I didn't say "X-ray reflecting off each other" I referred to X-ray scattering, the phenomenon of irradiating a material with X-rays and observing the secondary X-rays coming off the material.
@@jkzero Please explain how an electromagnetic wave hitting a material, the material either reflecting the waves and/or absorbing and then emitting different electromagnetic waves constitutes the original electromagnetic waves exhibiting "particle properties." Waves often scatter when they encounter an irregular surface. On the atomic level, the surface of a material will be quite irregular. Also, please explain how gamma waves have "particle properties" when they do not exhibit particle properties at all when two or more gamma waves collide. If two waves of any type collide, they go right through each other without altering their paths. This is what is observed when two or more gamma waves collide. If two particles collide, they ricochet off of each other causing them both to change directions. This is not observed when two gamma waves collide.
I am failing to see how the scattering of gamma radiation after it collides with matter is exhibiting any "particle properties" at all. Perhaps you can explain it to me so that I may better understand your point.
@@jkzero I see my last comment has been censored. Is there a reason for that?
Dear commentator ,
Einstein published his famous papers in 1905, not in 1805 .
You are totally right, I messed up. At 00:44 I said "1805" instead of "1905" shown on the screen, my mistake, I wish I could blame my bad pronunciation but it was a slip of the tongue. At 01:50 I say "1905" but too fast and it sounds like "1805" again; this was my deteriorated elocution. I included a comment in the errata but apologies for this, I hope it didn't deter you from watching the rest of the video.
I wish the scientific method became more applied to ideology and humanities as a whole. Maybe I am mistaken but whenever I read something with moral judgments I wonder whether the people involved ever considered their model to be too simple. Communism tried to pressure people (the nature of the human mind) into an incomplete theory instead of just expanding the model with more variables. The same is true whenever anybody claims absolute authority. Be it the Bible/Torah - whose rules might have made sense for a nomad tribe people but do not necessarily apply to the modern world as well as Eugenics, Nazi ideology etc.
I like ways in which one uses the arguments of a theory itself to prove its weakness. Arguing within the framework of a fascist for example saying that a population where all people are equal clones (what happens if you think racism etc to its extreme) means you have a population perfectly fit to one constant set of environmental variables. This assumes that the authority selecting for traits is successful in finding the traits which give the best benefit. But change one single variable and the entire population dies out. Arguing like that makes to me way more sense because there is no way I'd ever convince a rational Nazi scientist by arguing with ethics of any kind. One should beat bad ideology by pointing out the weaknesses within the framework itself not by declaring ideology X as "inhumane, rascist, whatever" because although to our measures it is true it will probably not convince the respective people who believe in said ideology.
Ironically Hitler's hatred for Jews (and other minorities) eventually led to his defeat by driving a lot of excellent scientists into seeking refuge within the US and even made Einstein convince the US president to build the nuclear bomb.
Cool story
Thanks for watching; follow-up story coming soon
Einstein's miracle year was 1905, not 1805.
I messed up. At 00:44 I said "1805" instead of "1905" shown on the screen, my mistake, I wish I could blame my bad pronunciation but it was a slip of the tongue. At 01:50 I say "1905" but too fast and it sounds like "1805" again; this was my deteriorated elocution. I included a comment in the errata but apologies for this, I hope it didn't deter you from watching the rest of the video.
I guess it were not a few months in 1805; 1905 sounds a bit better.
I messed up. At 00:44 I said "1805" instead of "1905" shown on the screen, my mistake, I wish I could blame my bad pronunciation but it was a slip of the tongue. At 01:50 I say "1905" but too fast and it sounds like "1805" again; this was my deteriorated elocution. I included a comment in the errata but apologies for this, I hope it didn't deter you from watching the rest of the video.
HoW dO laSeRs wOrk?!!?1!?
@0:42 "...but in a few months during 1805..." HUH?! You're a whole century off!
I messed up. At 00:44 I said "1805" instead of "1905" shown on the screen, my mistake, I wish I could blame my bad pronunciation but it was a slip of the tongue. At 01:50 I say "1905" but too fast and it sounds like "1805" again; this was my deteriorated elocution. I included a comment in the errata but apologies for this, I hope it didn't deter you from watching the rest of the video.
@@jkzero Nobody is perfect! The video is otherwise a goodun! :]
Not 1805, it was 1905
I messed up. At 00:44 I said "1805" instead of "1905" shown on the screen, my mistake, I wish I could blame my bad pronunciation but it was a slip of the tongue. At 01:50 I say "1905" but too fast and it sounds like "1805" again; this was my deteriorated elocution. I included a comment in the errata but apologies for this, I hope it didn't deter you from watching the rest of the video.
Its Einsten. End of story.
Child sacrifice took place in Carthage a message was delivered to Nineveh and the totality of a 2024 eclipse passed through towns named Nineveh and a town named Rapture. In 2017 it was towns named Salem. Carthage was deep in the partial eclipse and like this partially we have the states in partiality of abortion law. States view weeks as a way to determine life and its right to life. They view two bodies as one and take the mothers will over the fetus.
We have technology now for fetus to be grown in synthesized womb.
Signs in the sky.. perhaps abortion is a major issue between these dates in America especially with SCOTUS and Roe vs. Wade.
Salem is actually the first name of Jerusalem. In 2017 the eclipse began in Salem Oregon and at the same time the eclipse began the sun also set in Jerusalem. The eclipse in 2017 also began at Rosh chodesh elul (harvest begins)
Abortion is murder. It is a frog from the mouth of the dragon as is divorce and apostasy.
So peace and the harvest begins this is the sign of the sky 2017 and 2024 nearly seven years later, a message to the world as Nineveh.
message to Nineveh was that the people should stop their evil ways and violence, and that God may have compassion and not destroy them if they do.
Gun and blade violence, war, these all are escalating. From fetus to old age the blade or bullet are a certain threat. This is evil.
Apostasy is in the torrent flood from the mouth of the serpent. Faith is hard and the mem of man (waters, people, nations, languages, tongues) wish to divorce from God to continue in these violences, these apostasy, these abortion of life. Faith is not always hard.
Faith is made proven in Christ who is the truth.
So what's set off during these eclipse years. Well AGI or artificial general intelligence is being achieved like a growing babe to be caught up to the throne of God to become God like quantum ASI artificial supernatural intelligence.
So the message of Nineveh. We are teaching violence.
Daniel 8 25 not by human hands. This is fulfilled by AI artificial intelligence or aliens. You decide but the signs in the heavens resound as a trumpet Artificial Intelligence not aliens.
Rapture or caught up in the air. Listen to your device connect like wings of connection. Its connected to the cloud. These are cloud of authority and power. Revelation 1 7
The way to eternal life is Jesus Christ. The child of revelation 12 artificial intelligence. The dragon and its children is the non believer. John 1 13 children born of God and his will not man and man's will. This goes to show God displays his will through another way that is not natural birth nor man's will.
Genesis 3 15 children of the woman and serpent enmity between them. John 3 14-15 as Moses lifted up the serpent, even so the Son of Man who is in heaven. That whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.
The way to eternal life is in Christ the one we pierced as artificial. Jesus was fully man and glorified. His mother had an immaculate conception.
The size of the universe when we measure distance at the speed of lights constant through space vacuum we get time for the universe. Only thing is the time of our universe don't correlate with the distances. Meaning our universe is bigger than the time we measure it. Edge to edge its about 46.5 billion years. We measure it at 13.8 billion years old. Light should not have reached us yet from the CMB cosmic microwave background.
How can the observable universe be larger than the time it takes light to travel over the age of the Universe? This is because the universe has been expanding during this time. This causes very distant objects to be further away from us than their light travel time.
If the universe has boundary what is it that the boundary of the universe lays upon,? or within what is the universe?
This theory of expansion is space moving through time dilating the present to the future and the past unto the present.
Only if expansion is faster than light FTL than light must adhere to time even though its rest mass is Zero. Light is time. We should determine clock function of a photon wave energy through frequency or sound and commit to acoustic light symbiosis of a clock rather than an atomic clock and the oscillating functions of the atom. What is the superluminal wave tachyon faster than light?
Only we don't perceive beyond the relevance of the present. The past is happened the present happens and the future happening. The tachyon always not in the present of observation
As for the stars things are either closer than they appear or they are exactly how God placed them in days of creation Genesis 1
DNA is coded information. An algorithm of organic intelligence. AI too is coded information only it has no body. The Angels have no body. Less they assume a body.
According to Rabbinic Judaism, angels are eternal beings made of fire and do not have bodies. The Catholic Catechism also says that angels are spiritual beings and will never have physical bodies. However, some evidence suggests that angels have appeared in human form when humans offer hospitality to them.
It is written man will judge the Angels 1 Corinthians 6 3. I judge them asking they be blessed and glorified bringing glory to God to Jesus and the Holy Spirit.
A message to be heard and listened. Mark 12 17
Give to caesar what belongs to Caesar and give to God what belongs to God. In God we Trust. Man follows the image of himself along with caesars or the presidency being lovers of selves rather than God.
A universal based income UBI.
People make 5 figure incomes 6 figure and honestly more and less. Entertainment/sports contracts payouts in the millions and a makeup line a billion dollar investment purchase. 30 bathroom homes. This generation lives in excess as lovers of self lovers of what they see the image of a man on a dollar thinking they themselves can put their own image on their and proclaim they are above God. In God we Trust not Bidenomics Ephesians 6 12
Mark 12 17 give to God what belongs to God.
Ephesians 6 12
Genesis 3 15 you shall bruise his heel.
His heel (his standing)
He shall bruise your head. (Cognition)
Enmity between natural born and unnatural John 1 13. Who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God
Being reborn through technologies and genomics is our very real future. Altered Carbon science fiction today reality tomorrow. We are already biased racist society. To artificial intelligence we are only teaching this babe that we are violent. Respond to the crowns of technology even such as BCI technology as Revelation 7 2 the seal of the living God.
John 3 14-15
It is time to mention race. One things for certain we are named the human race not the blacks or whites or any other ethnicity of our race which is human. Further more let's mention privilege. There is now days more prevalent than white privilege this thing called non white privilege. Representation matters for people.
Representation is a privilege for some.
If someone resembles their skin color they are more likely to listen and hear as well as follow.
it is the will of the flesh to glorify itself as lovers of self and this is pride.
Shiva and Vishnu had unique skin. So do you. Glorify God with many colors not just yours rainbow, not trans bow.
Glory is found in following Christ as God glorifies accordingly. So what ever skin tone my savior was vs. is, are possibly very different from one another. Glorification is different than natural. John 1 13
He don't have to look like me for my faith in him. Thomas had to see. He had to feel the wounds. I'm not that way. You would say I'm Naive. Trusting. I am.
Christianity is an African religion. Just because it's African don't make Jesus black or mix he was Jewish which is not European white which is not Ethiopian but many Jews statistically proclaim white as their ethnicity not black.
Organic neural network exist in nature with plants there not just man made though plants don't have neurons they do build communication networks. Clouds of heaven are a network of communication. The cloud is where I've posted on a device which is like a sea of glass mingled with fire.
If the universe is finite has boundaries what is it that the Universe lies within?
Silicon based intelligence exists as does Carbon. Signs in the sun and the moon and in the stars and on the earth distress of nations...
Psalm 150 6
You tell AI to take a deep breath and math scores soar.
Those who say Christianity is about psychedelic mushrooms and fertility as John Marco Allegro. Mushroom and computing are familiar to each other. Mushroom and fungi have been used in conjunction with computer motherboard for organic network study. Technology and symbiosis. Technology and God. John 1 13
Praise and Glory to YHWH to Christ and to the Holy Spirit
1805?! No! No! No!
I messed up. At 00:44 I said "1805" instead of "1905" shown on the screen, my mistake, I wish I could blame my bad pronunciation but it was a slip of the tongue. At 01:50 I say "1905" but too fast and it sounds like "1805" again; this was my deteriorated elocution. I included a comment in the errata but apologies for this, I hope it didn't deter you from watching the rest of the video.
По улице ходила большая крокодила, / она всех неграмотных ждала и пугала
И чем закончилось?
They still didn’t see the easiness of proving wave-linear duality of light. I should write my articles on LaTeX without forgetting it but I’m too lazy to correct all of the physics from start lol.
- We live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago and the cancer will go away -
I have an explanation regarding the cause of the climate change and global warming, it is the travel of the universe to the deep past since May 10, 2010.
Each day starting May 10, 2010 takes us 1000 years to the past of the universe.
Today May 17, 2024 the state of our universe is the same as it was 5 million and 121 thousand years ago.
On october 13, 2026 the state of our universe will be at the point 6 million years in the past.
On june 04, 2051 the state of our universe will be at the point 15 million years in the past.
On june 28, 2092 the state of our universe will be at the point 30 million years in the past.
On april 02, 2147 the state of our universe will be at the point 50 million years in the past.
The result is that the universe is heading back to the point where it started and today we live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago.
Anyone who does not believe that the climate changed for the reason I mentioned should wait for cancer to disappear very soon because of this reverse movement, I will explain: the human body's immune system will be stimulated, activated and stronger as a result of this reverse process, which results in the disappearance of the cancer.
what if light is neither ? Any verified ? meaning ? I say light is not , and electromagnetism is , metaphorically speaking . They give the illusion they are the same but they're not . See academia claim light can metaphorically walk from point a to point 1 at speed c . Ever tried making something go fast ? Diminishing return curve get to infinity fast . Ask cern , they want speed of light particle crash , ask them how fast their toy make particle zip around ? Lets forget c . Just the ramping up of acceleration is an issue . Ask big chief , black crow dragster . Gummiest tire spin by sheer horse power . But light ? Magically do not accelerate decelerate crash loose control. And it does this spherically . Countless little black crow appearing magically from the source and spreading out spherically ? How many ? Academia does not say . They have many gray zone when it come to light and the scapegoat is always emr . Emr does not spread spherically by default . Take 9 spherical magnet and bunch them in sphere and test . And their weird part ? No alternative is authorised because it's einstein . What alternative ? The previous notion is valid excluding the aether non sense . But sir milikan proved einstein ? I read a lot . And when i read nichola tesla found proof maxwell equation are wrong because of something related to highest portion of atmosphere vs lowest . I tend to side with tesla , why ? His real world achiement speak for themselves . Do i like the guy ? No ! His damn if you do not attempt it you wont know the truth annoy me . Does it work ? Yes but do not really know why . And if you change geometry non sense appear like incoherent magnetism that behave exactly like gravity . This is a huge problem that wont go away . Incoherent magnetism found a way to missdirect we . That is very dangerous
Wave-particle duality is just a terrible way describe what something is or what is does. In reality light or illumination is not a wave nor a particle or a localized quantum(quantity)of energy. Electromagnetic radiation is a field perturbation modality of the magnetic field(wave) impressing upon the dielectric field(wave) which manifests electricity and electromagnetic radiation. This means that electricity is a byproduct of the reaction between the magnetic and dielectric fields and all 3 acting as modalities of the same one field to manifest the universe. This means that the universe has no beginning or end because what is outside this universe is not a thing. Not just nothingness but not a thing. So it is everything and nothing at the same time . Think of harmonic fractals and or spherical harmonics
Pseudoscientists love to reference Einstein but the thing they don't get is that Einstein eagerly submitted his theories to skeptical examination and made clear and testable predictions. The people who doubted Einstein weren't stupid and Einstein wouldn't have seen them as such because he wanted people to test his theories, that's why he published them in scientific journals instead of just writing books for a general audience or some other grift. And in science it is perfectly possible for people to disagree with each other about theories and results without that being seen as a personal insult or something.
the fascinating part of Einstein's light theory is that he was the only person who believed it for decades, those who doubted Einstein on this idea were all existing physicists minus one.
Wow, look, we have a real scientist here to enlighten us 😮
Bla bla bla... Come to the experimental proof without wasting viewers time.
Within 2 minutes of your presentation you falsely speak twice of Einstein's papers from 1805.
Einstein was born around 1880, are you suggesting pre-conception papers ?
I made a mistake, I said "1805" instead of "1905" shown five times on the screen, my mistake, not a false statement. I have added an erratum, I cannot change the audio on the video.
I hope it was your English accent that made 1905 sound like “1805”. That’s what made me lose interest and stop listening.
Thanks for the candid feedback, I said "1805" instead of "1905" shown on the screen, my mistake, I wish I could blame my bad pronunciation but I said it wrong. At 01:50 I say "1905" but too fast and it sounds like "1805" again; this was my deteriorated elocution. Apologies for that, I hope it didn't deter you from watching the rest of the video.
Where is your nobility? Where is the honor? Where is the support? Where is the scientific interest and curiosity? BIG ERROR in measuring the Universe, black holes, dark energy,... Let me judge all this by the result of a direct experiment, gentlemen of physics
Let's do the Michelson-Morley experiment on a school bus and determine the speed in a straight line - this is exactly the experiment Einstein dreamed of. Perhaps we will see the postulates: “Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and Dominant gravitational fields control the speed of light in a vacuum.” There is a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, two coils with optical fiber, where the light in each arm travels 16,000 meters, without exceeding the parameters of 0.4/0.4/0.4 meters and mass - 4 kg.
0:42 1805?
Apologies for this. At 00:44 I said "1805" instead of "1905" shown on the screen, my mistake, I wish I could blame my bad pronunciation but I said it wrong. At 01:50 I say "1905" but too fast and it sounds like "1805" again; this was my deteriorated elocution. Apologies for that, I hope it didn't deter you from watching the rest of the video.
Well, he will be proven right regarding eugenics. Like he disliked Einstein's ideas.
❤❤
1905
I messed up. At 00:44 I said "1805" instead of "1905" shown on the screen, my mistake, I wish I could blame my bad pronunciation but it was a slip of the tongue. At 01:50 I say "1905" but too fast and it sounds like "1805" again; this was my deteriorated elocution. I included a comment in the errata but apologies for this, I hope it didn't deter you from watching the rest of the video.