Yo, Ilya from lemlist here! ❤️ Just wanted to jump into the conversation here. 😊 1. All campaigns are from real people and as such have real results, as well as being verified with users prior to publishing them. We’re in the transparency business… always, forever. 2. Thanks for highlighting the issue with typos… need to work on my polyglot skills as the templates were translated from different languages. It’ll be fixed 👌 3. The reason why some templates worked extremely well is that they were well-targeted, adapted to the factors such as industry, country, relevancy, language, etc. Seeing users succeed is our mission… so definitely happy about their results so far. Anyway, hope it makes sense.🔥
My template was the one with bad grammar haha. The campaign was originally sent in Spanish and what they did was just throw it in Google translate and publish it. That's why the grammar is off 😂
It would be more valuable to see it in spanish, congrats btw Showing a google translate of a script means the open rate does not match the actual sent campaign
No offence to my Spanish brothers and sisters, but what you said makes sense. Also, I would think you'll get much less competition targeting Spanish speaking clients...English speaking clients are 10x more difficult, as competition is extremely fierce and they've probably seen/heard everything technique in the book.
Lemlist has an FB group where people who achieve GREAT email stats with cold emails post their results. Then lemlist adds those emails on this template website page.
Not a shot these #'s are accurate. MAYBE in some cases the #'s are accurate because the volume is SO low that they never had a chance to see the conversion difference at scale, or the conversion difference after some deliverability challenges.
I think lemlist doesn’t check the performance or cross check that, as far as I know someone take screenshots and post that on lemlist. I found it mostly irrelevant data.
I got my best leads with a template where Alex says not to do that haha. Nevertheless I learnt everything from Alex about cold emailing. So Alex, thanks for this. By the way, where can I send my template for you to break it down? I'm curious what you have to say about it.
They're definitely bloating numbers to appeal to beginners and people who don't know better. Typos, low effort generic sentences, and even a paragraph about an unsubscribe button?? So disingenuous.
That's what I'm saying, and *if* it's bloated data, that ruins our gut feel. We all need to be able to see when a campaign will work and when it won't. With cloudy data you could get trained on a lie, and it will kill your skill development long term
The only negative to this would be *if* the data is not correct I have no problem with the scripts in general, the more templates the better - but by giving false data you're ruining the salesperson's gut feel and hurting the development of the cold email skill
Not a Lemlist fan, but you saying "figures are fake", not bringing any proof, then state in the comment that "they could be right", it's a shame. The reply from Ilya is perfect : you have zero idea what was the recipient list, and if correctly targeted, those numbers might be real. But most important, keep in mind we, sales people, are coming to lemlist blog for inspiration, not to challenge the figures. Spitting on free content to get some views on youtube is a shame. You're less trustworty that lemlist figures
As a scientist showing fake data is the worst thing you can do as training for other scientists. We’re not in this for inspiration, we’re trying to master the craft. I am a lemlist fan we use 20+ seats right now
Yo, Ilya from lemlist here! ❤️
Just wanted to jump into the conversation here. 😊
1. All campaigns are from real people and as such have real results, as well as being verified with users prior to publishing them. We’re in the transparency business… always, forever.
2. Thanks for highlighting the issue with typos… need to work on my polyglot skills as the templates were translated from different languages. It’ll be fixed 👌
3. The reason why some templates worked extremely well is that they were well-targeted, adapted to the factors such as industry, country, relevancy, language, etc. Seeing users succeed is our mission… so definitely happy about their results so far.
Anyway, hope it makes sense.🔥
Thanks for the response!
It could be that their data is skewed because the lists they were sending to were warmer.
They were translating emails from other languages into english. They've since put a disclaimer on the site
My template was the one with bad grammar haha. The campaign was originally sent in Spanish and what they did was just throw it in Google translate and publish it. That's why the grammar is off 😂
That would be misleading - it's starting to make sense now
It would be more valuable to see it in spanish, congrats btw
Showing a google translate of a script means the open rate does not match the actual sent campaign
@@AlexBerman thanks man! Your videos have helped out alot
No offence to my Spanish brothers and sisters, but what you said makes sense. Also, I would think you'll get much less competition targeting Spanish speaking clients...English speaking clients are 10x more difficult, as competition is extremely fierce and they've probably seen/heard everything technique in the book.
Lemlist has an FB group where people who achieve GREAT email stats with cold emails post their results. Then lemlist adds those emails on this template website page.
I agree I'm in the group. There's no way they would fabricate a bunch of data, right?
I'm just raising the question - I hope they're not. Or if they are, I hope they fix it
lol shades Patrick Dang in the description
@patrick dang let’s do an interview brother
I love lemlist and their support team but yeah- these scripts are really rough.
I just want them to do better
Not a shot these #'s are accurate. MAYBE in some cases the #'s are accurate because the volume is SO low that they never had a chance to see the conversion difference at scale, or the conversion difference after some deliverability challenges.
I think lemlist doesn’t check the performance or cross check that, as far as I know someone take screenshots and post that on lemlist.
I found it mostly irrelevant data.
Irrelevant data is not cool
The hand gestures on the entro though...😅
I got my best leads with a template where Alex says not to do that haha. Nevertheless I learnt everything from Alex about cold emailing. So Alex, thanks for this. By the way, where can I send my template for you to break it down? I'm curious what you have to say about it.
Hey! Inside Email10k. Here: email10k.com
@@AlexBerman awesome, thanks Alex, I'll keep watching your videos, just love em all!
They're definitely bloating numbers to appeal to beginners and people who don't know better. Typos, low effort generic sentences, and even a paragraph about an unsubscribe button?? So disingenuous.
That's what I'm saying, and *if* it's bloated data, that ruins our gut feel. We all need to be able to see when a campaign will work and when it won't. With cloudy data you could get trained on a lie, and it will kill your skill development long term
Did I get the first view on this video? Do I get a prize for that?
Hi Michael. I have sent you 1000 00 millions of dollars. Will arrive in 5-6 business days.
@@JohnSmith-bc3mm excellent! I knew you guys would do the right thing!
We should start doing some prizes haha
@@AlexBerman I think that would motivate people. Plus, early volume on videos is an important indicator for organic reach, right?
@@SocialConsciousness It is
I never really loved the templates..
Looks more like a copywriters 1st draft than a properly curated script that gets more than 15% reply rates.
The only negative to this would be *if* the data is not correct
I have no problem with the scripts in general, the more templates the better - but by giving false data you're ruining the salesperson's gut feel and hurting the development of the cold email skill
AUM assets under management
Great domain 😂
Not a Lemlist fan, but you saying "figures are fake", not bringing any proof, then state in the comment that "they could be right", it's a shame. The reply from Ilya is perfect : you have zero idea what was the recipient list, and if correctly targeted, those numbers might be real. But most important, keep in mind we, sales people, are coming to lemlist blog for inspiration, not to challenge the figures. Spitting on free content to get some views on youtube is a shame. You're less trustworty that lemlist figures
As a scientist showing fake data is the worst thing you can do as training for other scientists. We’re not in this for inspiration, we’re trying to master the craft. I am a lemlist fan we use 20+ seats right now
@@AlexBerman then prove it's fake bro, you're definitely not a scientist here