@@bijogeojose7209 Bijo Jose....Malanakar Catholic church follow Syriac Orthodox Church (an oriental orthodox church) rituals and liturgy. Oriental Orthodox churches were never a part of the Roman Church and unlike Eastern Orthodox Churches, these churches had nothing to do with the Schism.
@@shijuvarghese4217 Yes the Syriac orthodox church and the other oriental churches separated after 2 centuries after the Council of Chalcedon (451 AD). Before the council, the oriental churches were in full communion with Rome. This is evident from the writings and letters of St. Theodoret, Patriarch of Antioch (420 AD). "I, therefore, beseech your holiness to persuade the most holy and blessed bishop (Pope Leo) to use his Apostolic power, and to order me to hasten to your Council. For that most holy throne (Rome) has the sovereignty over the churches throughout the universe on many grounds." (Theodoret, Tom. iv. Epist. cxvi. Renato, p. 1197). "It pertains to you (Pope Leo) to hold the primacy in all things, for your throne is adorned with many prerogatives." (Theodoret Ibid, Epist. Leoni) "For that all holy throne has the office of heading the Churches of the whole world, for many reasons; and, above all others, because it has remained free of the communion of heretical taint, and no one holding heterodox sentiments ever sat in it, but it has preserved the Apostolic grace unsullied." (Theodoret, Epist Renato)
@@bijogeojose7209 Did you interpret that being in communion meant being a single church under Rome ? If that's the case..there is no scope of further discussion.
thank you asianet for this great programme......
May God make him the next Holy Father,if it be according his Holy Will! Let us pray for him.
ente acharyanu mangalangal
🙏🙏🙏
Good
മലങ്കര ഓർത്തഡോക്സ് സഭയുടെ കാതോലിക്ക സ്ഥാനം അടിച്ചുമാറ്റിയ മഹാ
Mathabranthan
Mathrega sabha il madangi vaa....Rome has nothing to do with eastern church...manasil aakan sadhichillalo ningalku
Before the schism Rome thanne allarno Mother church. Angott thanne thirich poyi.
@@bijogeojose7209 Bijo Jose....Malanakar Catholic church follow Syriac Orthodox Church (an oriental orthodox church) rituals and liturgy. Oriental Orthodox churches were never a part of the Roman Church and unlike Eastern Orthodox Churches, these churches had nothing to do with the Schism.
@@shijuvarghese4217 Yes the Syriac orthodox church and the other oriental churches separated after 2 centuries after the Council of Chalcedon (451 AD). Before the council, the oriental churches were in full communion with Rome.
This is evident from the writings and letters of St. Theodoret, Patriarch of Antioch (420 AD).
"I, therefore, beseech your holiness to persuade the most holy and blessed bishop (Pope Leo) to use his Apostolic power, and to order me to hasten to your Council. For that most holy throne (Rome) has the sovereignty over the churches throughout the universe on many grounds." (Theodoret, Tom. iv. Epist. cxvi. Renato, p. 1197).
"It pertains to you (Pope Leo) to hold the primacy in all things, for your throne is adorned with many prerogatives." (Theodoret Ibid, Epist. Leoni)
"For that all holy throne has the office of heading the Churches of the whole world, for many reasons; and, above all others, because it has remained free of the communion of heretical taint, and no one holding heterodox sentiments ever sat in it, but it has preserved the Apostolic grace unsullied." (Theodoret, Epist Renato)
@@bijogeojose7209 Did you interpret that being in communion meant being a single church under Rome ? If that's the case..there is no scope of further discussion.