This one? Anker Prime Power Bank, 27,650mAh 3-Port 250W Portable Charger: amzn.to/49gwkWp Would be nice to test, but it's $179.99 and nobody is sending it to me for free :-(((
Ah is not measure of energy. Watt hours is the way to go. So if the capacity is 99.9 Wh and the result you got is 81.75 Wh you get an efficiency of 87.5%. Which is actually pretty good. You're welcome
but the 25.000mah variant of this is also doing exactly 81wh. So this is actually less efficient?
Keep me updated im curious about this
So the 25000 is way smaller and same amout of Wh
BUT the real test to be honest the Anker 27000mah the new one with Bluetooth discharge rate of about 200 watts
This one? Anker Prime Power Bank, 27,650mAh 3-Port 250W Portable Charger: amzn.to/49gwkWp
Would be nice to test, but it's $179.99 and nobody is sending it to me for free :-(((
@@allcheckout yeah me neither LOL but mannnn I was able to charge this thing at 165 wats using 2 chargers lol I really wish you could test it
@@THEPLANETEARTH Nice. How much did you pay for it?
@@allcheckout 179
Ah is not measure of energy. Watt hours is the way to go. So if the capacity is 99.9 Wh and the result you got is 81.75 Wh you get an efficiency of 87.5%. Which is actually pretty good.
You're welcome
Hmmm I've been explaining that even much more in detail in the video .... lol .. but thanks anyway ....
@alvarogalagonzalez5374 "..if the capacity is 99.9 Wh and the result you got is 81.75 Wh you get an efficiency of 87.5%"
Try again.
YESSSSSSSS THANK YOU!!!! Hahahahahhahahahah!!!!
Very welcome ;-))