CIRRUS VISION JET vs ECLIPSE JET: Which Should I Buy?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лют 2024
  • Considering purchasing a private jet but torn between the Cirrus Vision Jet and the Eclipse 550? Or just want to see 2 cool airplanes?
    In this video, I share my personal experience and honest comparison of these two jets. And I will decide what I will buy when I upgrade from my Cirrus SR 22T.
    From interior and exterior design to performance, cost, and practicality, I dive deep into the pros and cons of each, helping you make an informed decision.
    We talk about:
    Personal Background & Cirrus Vision Jet Experience
    Exterior Design Comparison
    Interior Design & Comfort Analysis
    Avionics & Safety Features Breakdown
    Performance Evaluation: Speed, Altitude, Range
    Cost Analysis: Purchase Price vs. Operating Expenses
    Practicality & Real-world Considerations
    Conclusion: My Choice & Final Thoughts
    How Private Jets Can Be Financially Beneficial
    Join the discussion in the comments and let me know which aircraft you would choose and why!
    If you like this video, you will l love these videos.....
    Save taxes with airplanes - • How my Cirrus 22T is P...
    See me test and land a Cirrus Jet - • I ordered a Cirrus Vis...
    #PrivateJets #CirrusVisionJet #Eclipse550 #AircraftComparison #Aviation #LuxuryTravel #PilotLife #cirrus #cirrusaircraft #visionjet #privatejet #sr22 #cirrussr22 #tonyjavier #10xtv #aviationadventure
    ___________________________________________________________________
    Connect with me on all my platforms:
    Subscribe to my UA-cam channel: / @tonyjaviertv
    Follow me on Social Media:
    Tiktok - / tonyjavier.tv
    Instagram - tonyjavier....
    Facebook Personal - / tonyejavier
    Facebook Business - / realtonyjavier
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Tony is the owner of an INC 5000-rated Real Estate Investment Company. He has
    been featured in Bigger Pockets, Wholesaling INC, Steve Trang's Real Estate Disruptors, Joe Fairless' Best Ever Podcast, and many other top podcasts and platforms.
    When Tony is not working on his business, he enjoys flying his plane. You can see videos on that and how he uses airplanes to save money on taxes.
    Don't forget to like the video, comment, subscribe to my channel, and share this with a friend if I'm doing my job and providing value to you and your network. If I'm not doing my job please let me know in the comments how I can be better, your feedback is greatly appreciated. See you in the next video!
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    If you want to grow your Real Estate business, see more podcasts, or get free resources - Go to www.TonyJavier.com.
    Want to be a guest on my podcast? www.tonyjavier.com/podcastapplication
    10X your ROI with our TV Program and dominate your real estate market with TV commercials here: www.REMTV.com
    To fund 100% of your real estate deals visit my gap funding company: www.GapFundingSolutions.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 88

  • @CobusDerrenberg
    @CobusDerrenberg 3 місяці тому +12

    Trust me, the Eclipse 550 is LOOSE HANDS the winner in literally all aspects !
    Just amazing: Fuel cons great even though its a twin, performance and ceiling is AWESOME !
    No weather concerns up high !
    LOVE IT 🤗👍✨
    Get the twin 🏆👍✨

  • @MikeB-in1nd
    @MikeB-in1nd 3 дні тому +1

    Regarding the parachute how many of those resulted in injuries

  • @aj3289
    @aj3289 3 місяці тому +10

    You may want to double-check your fuel capacity units... g'day

  • @mjrussell2372
    @mjrussell2372 День тому

    The Eclipse needs 2800 ft to land. The vision only needs 1638. This is great for emergency landings and more access to small airports

  • @shardie78239
    @shardie78239 12 днів тому +1

    I like the eclipse but interior is bad. I think I’d look at used 100EX or older Honda Jet. The cool thing about Honda Jet is the that you can buy one used and they are scalable, by adding upgrades the others can’t do. They do this so you can keep them longer, and resale is excellent!

  • @frederickhalljr8947
    @frederickhalljr8947 20 днів тому

    Good Choice

  • @Wkcrt
    @Wkcrt 3 місяці тому +4

    From my understanding the 1st gen honda jet is kinda like the vision jet in terms of performance as well. Take a look at one of the Embraer Phenom 100s, it’s the only in it’s class(“very light jet”) to have a full lavatory, without the lav I believe you can replace it with another seat and have 6 full seats. It’s Single pilot rated so you could always stick a trustworthy passenger in the right seat. It’s got the g1000 setup with a separate AP, and some sort of keyboard like the cirrus, coupled to the MFD/PFD I presume. It’s MTOW is around 10,000lbs. (It may even have a STC gross weight increase) Take off roll around 3,400ft at MTOW and the landing roll should be about the same. The TAS is around 380kts or Mach 0.66(so a little bit on the slower side) however it’s max ceiling is FL410, and the range should be right at 1300NM. It’s got a pretty good time to climb at FL370 of 23mins. Burns about 70gal an hour at cruise. Holds around 400gal. Has 2 Prat and Whitney’s (PW600) producing 1,700lbs of thrust each engine. You should be able to find some used ones built around 2009-10 for around 2millon, of course maintenance for the used jet has to be taken into consideration. Although I don’t think it has reversers so at least that’s one less system to pay upkeep on.😂 (could always look at the Embraer phenom 300, I think it’s a 9-10pax jet so it goes into the light business jet class, and of course is a bit more expensive.)

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  3 місяці тому +1

      I think Honda Jet is way more expensive. Phenom is on my list to look at but I don’t think it’s nearly as economical. Good to think about these!

  • @cougarlove8542
    @cougarlove8542 17 днів тому

    I agree with the assessment

  • @thefamilywork3410
    @thefamilywork3410 3 місяці тому +10

    They both burn about 70 gph. You'd be in a 2 seat LSA to get 4.9 gph.

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  3 місяці тому

      I had my team pull numbers and didn’t double check when I spit these off. My SR22T burns 17 in cruise so should have caught that.

    • @rickdc3
      @rickdc3 3 місяці тому +4

      The Eclipse only burns 55-60 gph while flying 50 knots faster.

  • @mjrussell2372
    @mjrussell2372 18 днів тому

    The seat configuration in the Cirrus Vision Jet is changeable. You can opt for 6 seats and add more cabin space if needed. Not to mention Cirrus interior makes Eclipse look like a rental car. I would put the safety of the Cirrus above the extra performance capabilities of the Eclipse.

  • @sameersmerchant
    @sameersmerchant 3 місяці тому +4

    Eclipse is twin. I would go with that

  • @Assassin1959
    @Assassin1959 3 місяці тому

    Cirrus 2000 gal? or 2000 lbs of fuel? I think now the new Cirrus SF50 has the Garmin 3000.

  • @shardie78239
    @shardie78239 12 днів тому +1

    Hey Scott here. You might want to check out Flaris Lar 1 jet. Looks like cirrus but cooler. Interior is awesome. 2.5 mil

    • @keljaz6616
      @keljaz6616 12 годин тому

      ... heck of an airplane. Hopefully it goes to production. Thanks!

  • @salcirruspilot4998
    @salcirruspilot4998 3 місяці тому +3

    As a pilot, how do you get the fuel burn so wrong?

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  3 місяці тому +3

      That’s what happens when you have a million things going on and have your team get you numbers. I just spit them off to be honest without thinking about it. Lesson learned.

  • @highendaudio
    @highendaudio 2 місяці тому

    You missed a step in between your 22T and 550: a turbine. A proper turbine may have been a better option all around when you look at performance and more importantly, cost of ownership. My two cents.

  • @BonanzaPilot
    @BonanzaPilot 3 місяці тому +6

    eclipse is a real jet. It can go to FL410. Cirrus jet has has single engine turboprop performance with light jet runway requirements and payload, not a good deal.

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  3 місяці тому

      @bonanzapilot I agree. If they fixed the payload it would be a tougher choice but Eclipse wins this one.

    • @stevemyers2092
      @stevemyers2092 3 місяці тому +2

      @@TonyJavierTV Ill take a second engine over a parachute any day.

    • @mjrussell2372
      @mjrussell2372 День тому

      The range on this vision jet is actually a little longer than the eclipse. Plus in a medical emergency it will land itself. Thats bad ass. Safety over performance all day long.

    • @BonanzaPilot
      @BonanzaPilot День тому

      @@mjrussell2372 take a closer look at the numbers. Eclipse jet is doing that range at 400 knots and as high as 41k feet. cirrus jet is making it over 1000nm at 250 knots at 25k feet with only 1 person on board... Autoland is a cool party trick but altitude speed and a second engine is preferred over a parachute and an autoland feature

  • @agustinmisaza
    @agustinmisaza 3 місяці тому

    You should consider the Premier 1A. 460kts, 41,000 ceiling, single pilot. A hot road and for similar $$. And made by Beechcraft a sign of the best quality. Low points, not in production, not easy to get parts.

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  3 місяці тому

      Never heard of it but I’ll check it out! At first looks from google it’s not super sexy but 460 kts sounds amazing.

    • @agustinmisaza
      @agustinmisaza 3 місяці тому

      @@TonyJavierTV sorry not 460 but max speed 451, is Mach .8, wouldn’t get those numbers on a Cirrus or eclipse. It costs more to operate but check it out. Have some friends that have it and they love this bird.

    • @rickdc3
      @rickdc3 3 місяці тому +1

      I have looked into it, but the operating cost is easily 2X the Eclipse. They also don't sell, with average time on the market of over a year, and you risk being AOG with part issues. Parts on the Eclipse are good right now with no AOG jets currently. I used to own a Honda Jet and would go back to that if 2X the operating cost wasn't an issue.

  • @tomnasser4720
    @tomnasser4720 Місяць тому +1

    Both are great jets. There’s pros and cons to both. I love my vision baby jet because it suits my missions perfectly. I don’t need to fly to 41,000 feet. As others have already pointed out. You made several mistakes on fuel burn and gallons per hour. It’s also a G 3000 and not a G 1000. Cirrus Aircraft is much stronger as a company compared to eclipse.

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  Місяць тому

      Vision jets are great! I guess if you have short missions. Anything longer than about two hours I would probably go with an eclipse or a phenom. Yes my numbers were off. I see that now.

  • @keitha.davidson5675
    @keitha.davidson5675 2 місяці тому +5

    I have owned an Eclipse 550, Cirrus SR22, and currently own a Piper M600. Switching to a Cirrus Vision Jet this year. I would strongly recommend you stay away from the Eclipse. It has no real service support (we had to fly it to Vegas from San Diego every time there was an issue, and there were MANY issues). The costs of maintaining the Eclipse were huge and it was never quite right. Plus, it does not go that much farther because you are using twice the amount of fuel (two engines vs. one), especially when below FL 300--it gulps fuel like crazy. Buy a new Vision Jet with all the warranty and maintenance coverage and you'll never have a bad day. Buy an Eclipse and set aside an extra $1 million for maintenance and repair costs and be prepared to be AOG for at least 25% of the each year. Plus, Cirrus Vision Jet has Garmin 3000. Eclipse uses its own proprietary system that is not half as good or modern.
    BTW, a turbo prop is all around more capable than any light jet. Piper M600/M700 and TBM 960 will beat any light jet in terms of all around usability in useful load, range, fuel burn, and high and hot scenarios. But the Vision Jet is more comfortable than the M600 and the TBM is a good $1 million or more in purchase price. So compromises must be made unless you have unlimited budget.

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  2 місяці тому

      Thanks for the input! Interesting enough I keep my airplane in San Diego and I told coast flight center I was thinking about the eclipse 550. He told me about the maintenance issues that I still need to check into.
      I know there are pros and cons of every airplane. I have thought about the TBM or even a Pilatus. Lots to research and lots to think about before making the decision. And waiting for bonus depreciation to come back.

    • @keitha.davidson5675
      @keitha.davidson5675 2 місяці тому

      @@TonyJavierTV That's where we keep our Piper M600 N46AD (KMYF). Coast Flight told us NOT to buy the Eclipse and we did anyway. Then sold it five months later for the M600. And you are right, there is no one perfect airplane. There's always compromises.
      If we are both at Coast at some point we should talk. Would love to hear your opinions on your buying decision journey.

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  2 місяці тому

      Jared told me that he told a customer not to buy it, and they regretted it. Must’ve been you! Would be cool to meet up sometime. Here’s my Facebook profile if you wanna shoot me a message. Www.facebook.com/tonyejavier

    • @keitha.davidson5675
      @keitha.davidson5675 2 місяці тому

      @@TonyJavierTV haha! Yep that was us! I’ll shoot you a message.

    • @jjsifo1
      @jjsifo1 4 дні тому

      Old pilot here , get a twin.

  • @shawnmclaughlin7418
    @shawnmclaughlin7418 2 місяці тому

    I'm gonna talk about this a little bit later

  • @nossonyoffe3805
    @nossonyoffe3805 3 місяці тому +2

    What about the citation mustang ever thought about that one ?

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  3 місяці тому

      Definitely going to look at citations in the future. They aren’t quite as economical unfortunately.

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  3 місяці тому

      What do you love most about the mustang? Talk me into it.

    • @nossonyoffe3805
      @nossonyoffe3805 3 місяці тому

      @@TonyJavierTV Number 1 I would say is the looks it definitely looks like a real jet as opposed to the Eclipse 500 and cirrus vision jet
      Number 2 it has more range
      Number 3 it’s faster then both the eclipse and cirrus vision
      Number 4 the price tag you can find a used one not too old in very nice condition for around the same price as the eclipse
      If your looking for a brand new mustang they go for around $3M and depending on options it will be a little more , the draw back is the operating cost of the mustang is going to be a little more then the other 2 jets , just that in itself is a very big drawback

    • @nossonyoffe3805
      @nossonyoffe3805 3 місяці тому

      @@TonyJavierTV I personally really like the looks of the mustang over the eclipse, I guess the phenom 100 will be in the same category as well

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  3 місяці тому +1

      ⁠@@nossonyoffe3805I will check into it! Thanks for the input. Phenom would be awesome too but may be a bit more pricey.

  • @samuelfitzpatrick9739
    @samuelfitzpatrick9739 2 місяці тому

    Tbm 960 is good value for money

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  Місяць тому +1

      Yes, checking into that as well!

  • @thecaptaincurt_
    @thecaptaincurt_ 3 місяці тому +2

    So you’re thinking about my favorite jet?!

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  3 місяці тому

      Which is your favorite?

    • @thecaptaincurt_
      @thecaptaincurt_ 3 місяці тому +1

      @@TonyJavierTV eclipse 550. Great comparison video though!

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  3 місяці тому +1

      Very nice! Seems like the most efficient single pilot jet and easy to fly.

  • @rickdc3
    @rickdc3 3 місяці тому +2

    Several mistakes. The Eclipse burns 55-60 gallons per hour at 350knots (and you confused total gallons with pounds). The Cirrus burns 70 at 300 knots. The operating cost of my Eclipse is $700/hr INCLUDING the engine program. For 100 hrs/year, most people spend $120-150k total, including all maintenance, on an Eclipse (my first year, including maintenance and insurance, has come in at $120k). Cirrus will probably cost double. Eclipse has centerline thrust, and even pulling one engine right at Vr is a non issue with an easy takeoff and climb. Losing the engine on the Cirrus at 200 ft is probably a death sentence, and coming down in the parachute in the middle of nowhere in the Rockies at night would be a nightmare. Going from a turboprop to a jet, I can tell you that the ability to fly at FL410 is a VERY big deal to get over weather. You are making a good choice. I don't understand why so many people buy the Cirrus jet - they must not do any research before they buy.

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  3 місяці тому +1

      You are correct. I had my team pull these numbers and didn’t double check. My wife’s Mercedes burns 4.9 GPH lol.
      Although the $2,000 an hour includes hangar, loan costs and everything included which I understand varies by how much you fly.
      Good to hear from an eclipse owner. I think Cirrus does a great job marketing which is why I bought my Cirrus SR22T.

    • @stevemyers2092
      @stevemyers2092 3 місяці тому +1

      they like the ICON interior.... give me the performance and safety of the 550 any day - Happy for you that you own one. a few years I will be able to afford one easily but i will be too old for medical i think - 70 now. and only Commercial Single Engine Land and Sea.

  • @JamR0ck
    @JamR0ck 3 місяці тому

    Can you buy a brand new eclipse?

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  3 місяці тому

      As far as I know yes.

    • @stevemyers2092
      @stevemyers2092 3 місяці тому +1

      no

    • @stevemyers2092
      @stevemyers2092 3 місяці тому

      On October 10, 2018, One Aviation announced it had voluntarily filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.[24][25][26] Citiking International, a Chinese-supported company, acquired the company; and the acquisition was cleared on March 9, 2020.[27] However, in February 2021, it was reported that those efforts were ultimately unsuccessful and that the company's Chapter 11 reorganization case had been converted to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidation process, with United States-based company AML Global Eclipse LLC maintaining support for all current Eclipse aircraft under the name Eclipse Aerospace, Inc.

    • @stevemyers2092
      @stevemyers2092 3 місяці тому

      @@TonyJavierTV where?
      On October 10, 2018, One Aviation announced it had voluntarily filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.[24][25][26] Citiking International, a Chinese-supported company, acquired the company; and the acquisition was cleared on March 9, 2020.[27] However, in February 2021, it was reported that those efforts were ultimately unsuccessful and that the company's Chapter 11 reorganization case had been converted to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidation process, with United States-based company AML Global Eclipse LLC maintaining support for all current Eclipse aircraft under the name Eclipse Aerospace, Inc.

    • @rickdc3
      @rickdc3 3 місяці тому +1

      @@stevemyers2092 Yes and No. Two new jets came off the production line last year. 5 jets are in construction awaiting engines, but will probably be bought by the person who currently owns the company.

  • @benjaminsmith4531
    @benjaminsmith4531 4 дні тому

    So many things were wrong in this video. How do you not double-check or do more research before producing something like this?

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  2 дні тому

      That is my mistake. I own many businesses and tried to provide a value withthis UA-cam channel so mistakes can be made. I will definitely validate numbers that my team puts together and make these videos much better in the future.

  • @yurimoros
    @yurimoros 2 місяці тому

    The eclipse is extremely hard to go spin

  • @merlepatterson
    @merlepatterson Місяць тому +1

    Obviously, one can't afford a Vision Jet from a YT channel subscription based under 1.5k subs.

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  Місяць тому

      That’s funny. There’s way more ways to make money than UA-cam.

    • @merlepatterson
      @merlepatterson Місяць тому

      @@TonyJavierTV Oh, I know. The information or tech industry is just one of the lucrative ways to fill your pocket book. But I'm not question it.

  • @user-jj6ov4sr2h
    @user-jj6ov4sr2h 2 місяці тому

    you're right the vision jet really looks like a fish

  • @pedro-rodriguespt
    @pedro-rodriguespt Місяць тому

    Cirrus Jet is not 1.9 millions?

  • @chadgriffith5819
    @chadgriffith5819 Місяць тому

    My comment was uncalled for and i apologize. A PA32.

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  Місяць тому

      @chadgriffith5819 Thanks for watching and commenting. I do these videos so I can learn more. I 100% own a Cirrus but only have over 100 hours of flight time. I’m definitely not a professional and don’t claim to be one. I have another pilot fly with me that really knows what they are doing because I’m just learning. Thanks for the feedback.

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  Місяць тому

      I’m curious what a typical Cirrus owner is. What do you own?

  • @stevemyers2092
    @stevemyers2092 3 місяці тому

    Eclipse 550 all the way.........even John Travolta has one.

  • @bburrett
    @bburrett 3 місяці тому

    Your fuel burn figures are off by about 10x....

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  3 місяці тому

      Yep! Didnt double check numbers my team put together.

  • @fideldevivo1875
    @fideldevivo1875 3 місяці тому

    2000 gals?? You mean pounds. 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • @robertguthrie6561
    @robertguthrie6561 3 місяці тому

    2000 Gal fuel capacity? LOL

    • @TonyJavierTV
      @TonyJavierTV  3 місяці тому

      We could only wish right? I meant pounds.

  • @yacahumax1431
    @yacahumax1431 14 днів тому

    If the Eclipse starts to go down, you are going to wish you had the cirrus parachute. I think pilots put too much trust in those engines. I see full families dying in a single plane. If I ever have the money to buy a plane, It will have a parachute. If something goes wrong, I can tell my kids, "dont worry", and pull that sucker.

  • @aaronmuller5891
    @aaronmuller5891 Місяць тому

    Literally everything you say is wrong man. Better go watch some other videos.

  • @chrisrichards9745
    @chrisrichards9745 20 днів тому

    Delete this video. You are way off on so many things and you are wasting peoples time. Please educate yourself before you speak.