Rolex Explorer II 226570 4K Watch Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 103

  • @BrittPearceWatches
    @BrittPearceWatches 3 роки тому +11

    Ahh loved this! Forever a special watch for us. My husband had an Explorer 2 when we first met, but a 216 ref.

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  3 роки тому +4

      Thank you for watching Brittany. Glad you enjoyed it. Keep up the good work on your channel. Regards, #WR4K

  • @dkw6227
    @dkw6227 18 днів тому +2

    Best review and cinematography of the 226570 I’ve seen ! Voice is easy to listen to, and I respect his thoughts on this watch.This is an excellent review , Thanks !

  • @paulsaret
    @paulsaret 2 роки тому +10

    The lug width is 22 (not the old 21), that is why the lugs are slimmer now.

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  2 роки тому +1

      Thank you for watching Paul. Correct. Apologies for the mistake. I have already acknowledged this in other comments. Unlike many other watch channels I do not edit out mistakes to appear flawless. I record all my videos the same way; pressing record on my camcorder and talking for circa 20 minutes straight about the piece in one take. Therefore there are a plethora of visual, and verbal mistakes in the 196 videos I have made in the last 20 months. Regards, #WR4K

  • @josevasquez1781
    @josevasquez1781 Рік тому +4

    Nice video, I went with both the black and white versions. They do wear well and feel more luxurious than previous versions.

  • @harleminthebuildn9234
    @harleminthebuildn9234 3 роки тому +10

    THIS WILL BE MY NEXT ROLEX. I WISH I GOT THIS ONE FIRST. GREAT PRESENTATION. TOP MARKS MATE. I LEARNED A FEW NEW THINGS ABOUT THIS WATCH FROM THIS VIDEO. 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  3 роки тому +2

      Thank you for watching. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards, #WR4K

  • @Nico-be7ic
    @Nico-be7ic 3 роки тому +4

    Guten Tag, John. Every video of yours is really an enjoyment. Dankeschön! Great that you are considering all price ranges! Regards, Nico

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  3 роки тому +3

      Thank you for watching Nico. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards, #WR4K

  • @rickfowler3710
    @rickfowler3710 3 роки тому +4

    Thank you for making this video, I'm nornally a vintage guy but after watching this I actually went right out and purchased one (grey market of course) I think your so right, all the little improvements nail everything they didn't get quite right with the previous ref. Everyone was sooo! upset they didn't get a ceramic bezel or green text that they missed it.

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you for watching Rick. Glad you enjoyed it. Congratulations. Excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Regards, #WR4K

  • @Giovan_Nino
    @Giovan_Nino 3 роки тому +2

    Hi John. Glad I’ve just rediscovered your channel..a through review thanks. As you may remember I had the previous model with the polar dial which I found uncomfortable on my wrist and sold it on..now reconsidering this new version. Would like to try it on but finding it impossible to get my hands on one. As you say as a 50th anniversary piece may be worth hanging on to this time round…👍

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  3 роки тому +2

      Thank you for watching John. Yes, I remember your watches. This version feels more balanced with the 22mm lug width and slimmer lugs. Less top-heavy as the weight of the head of the piece is more spread across the wider bracelet. They are very difficult to find at AD's, so really the only option is to pay a premium over retail and buy from a grey dealer like Chronext. Wear your pieces in good health. Regards, #WR4K

  • @fabriziot.4657
    @fabriziot.4657 3 роки тому +1

    I really appreciate that you review Watches from every range of price, from Pagani to Breitling, Rolex and so on.. !Keep on the great work man!

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  3 роки тому +2

      Thank you for watching Fabrizio. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards, #WR4K

  • @woodmant
    @woodmant 2 роки тому +4

    It's a great watch no doubt, but Rolex thinks it's worth what they priced for and not what you are selling it at which for you is a SIGNIFICANT profit! I'd rather wait... Also, this is more of a sales video than a critical review of the watch which is always more informative. Thank you for reading!
    .

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  2 роки тому +1

      Thank you for watching Roy. Regards, #WR4K

  • @ATIWatchReviews
    @ATIWatchReviews 3 роки тому +3

    Great all around watch. Sporty casual and classy. It should have a glide lock agreed.

  • @zachinapex
    @zachinapex 26 днів тому +1

    Great video dude!

  • @rick137.pickle
    @rick137.pickle 2 роки тому +3

    This only shows how underrated this watch is in 4k.

  • @mauricebrennan3475
    @mauricebrennan3475 2 роки тому +5

    Very professional review - well done.

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  2 роки тому +1

      Thank you for watching Maurice. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards, #WR4K

  • @fabfour289
    @fabfour289 Рік тому +1

    Some said that the new 226570 bezel size is 41.4mm and a bit shorter male endlink to endlink at 52.8mm..? Thanks for the vid.

  • @quarters-eye8922
    @quarters-eye8922 3 роки тому +2

    Excellent presentation John. I absolutely love the Black Dial. The finishing on the Bezel & bracelet are outstanding.
    The Rolex Explorer II is an incredible watch. Thank you for posting.
    Regards,

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you for watching Steven. Glad you enjoyed it. Wear your pieces in good health. Regards, #WR4K

  • @eyeheartsushi2212
    @eyeheartsushi2212 3 роки тому +5

    Thank you for reviewing the black dial version. Looks lovely and appears more versatile than the white dial. Cheers.

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  3 роки тому +2

      Thank you for watching. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards, #WR4K

  • @MF-hq9mq
    @MF-hq9mq 3 роки тому +4

    Excellent review, John. Only a few years back, this used to be a fairly under rated piece for Rolex, not now, though, as proved by the premium on the retail price! It’s just mad how the market has cut everyone but the super rich out. Loved the review, thanks for sharing. Regards

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  3 роки тому +4

      Thank you for watching Mario. Glad you enjoyed it. Agreed, it is now very difficult to purchase pieces from AD's. As you know I purchased my Oyster Perpetual 41 from a grey dealer to bypass the waiting list system at AD's. Personally I prefer just having a piece delivered via Fedex immediately, rather than waiting on a list with the uncertainty of ever being offered a piece. Is it worth paying over retail to get a piece immediately? Definitely. Wear your pieces in good health. Regards, #WR4K

  • @jacob1547
    @jacob1547 2 роки тому +2

    Just got mine. Truly a dream watch to behold

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  2 роки тому +2

      Congratulations. Excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Regards, #WR4K

    • @jacob1547
      @jacob1547 2 роки тому +1

      @@watchreviews4k Thank you so much for your word of blessing! 😊

  • @adamg3938
    @adamg3938 Рік тому +3

    My favourite Rolex

  • @sarangu8867
    @sarangu8867 2 місяці тому +1

    Incredibly beautiful watch. What is your wrist size?

  • @KeithOng
    @KeithOng 2 роки тому +2

    I love this watch. Bought it at a grey dealer as i don't want to wait.

    • @jacob1547
      @jacob1547 2 роки тому +1

      Wonder how much you pay for it in 2022!

    • @forextrader9110
      @forextrader9110 2 роки тому

      Hai fatto bene teschio
      Anche io preso in mercato grigio, non me ne frega un cazzo, se necessario lo prendo anche sul mercato viola a qualsiasi prezzo
      Questo orologio è la versione più bella di tutti gli explorer 2
      Vai cazzo fratello ora siamo soci e compagni di vita
      W EXPLORER 2 REF 226570
      THE BEST

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  2 роки тому +2

      @@forextrader9110 Per favore, evita di usare imprecazioni nei tuoi commenti sul mio canale. Saluti, #WR4K

    • @forextrader9110
      @forextrader9110 2 роки тому +1

      @@watchreviews4k yes scuse me 😒

  • @bushpig6837
    @bushpig6837 3 роки тому +4

    I thought this had a 22mm lug width not 21mm?

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you for watching. Correct. Apologies for the error. Regards, #WR4K

  • @beverlyyeo909
    @beverlyyeo909 3 роки тому +4

    best quality coverage of the black
    226570 I've seen here so far!

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  3 роки тому

      Thank you for watching Beverly. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards, #WR4K

  • @eglantinefrancoisg.9243
    @eglantinefrancoisg.9243 3 роки тому +1

    To me the previous 5 digits ref. is more eye pleasing, less "in your face" of a tool watch. But one has to admit that technically this one is way better (but it doesn't justify to pay a 30%+ premium to get it...)

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  3 роки тому +2

      Thank you for watching. Regards, #WR4K

    • @eglantinefrancoisg.9243
      @eglantinefrancoisg.9243 3 роки тому

      @@watchreviews4k I didn't mention your review is very interesting. Good job! 👍🏼

    • @forextrader9110
      @forextrader9110 2 роки тому +1

      Costa il 30% in più perché è semplicemente una referenza migliore e più recente
      Non vedo perché dovrebbe costare come le referenze precedenti

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  2 роки тому +1

      @@forextrader9110 Per favore, puoi usare Google Translate e pubblicare i tuoi commenti in inglese. Grazie. Saluti, #WR4K

  • @adamg3938
    @adamg3938 Рік тому +2

    Worth every penny

  • @kirillmikhailenko
    @kirillmikhailenko Рік тому +1

    thank you

  • @fpl66
    @fpl66 2 роки тому +1

    Nice, I got the "polar" version

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  2 роки тому +1

      Congratulations Filippo. Excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Regards, #WR4K

  • @craigbayliss829
    @craigbayliss829 2 роки тому +3

    Great watches...use mine for walking the dog.

  • @nothere603
    @nothere603 2 роки тому +1

    What UV torch is that? I need one 😅

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  Рік тому +2

      Thank you for watching. See link below. Regards, #WR4K
      www.amazon.co.uk/Veetop-Flashlight-Blacklight-Ultraviolet-Inspection/dp/B076P657X2/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?crid=1TEVMID49B9AV&keywords=100+led+uv+torch&qid=1664125255&qu=eyJxc2MiOiIyLjQ3IiwicXNhIjoiMi4zOSIsInFzcCI6IjIuNjAifQ%3D%3D&sprefix=100+led+uv+torch%2Caps%2C105&sr=8-1-spons&psc=1&spLa=ZW5jcnlwdGVkUXVhbGlmaWVyPUEzR05GM0pYUERXTkFIJmVuY3J5cHRlZElkPUExMDM0ODI2M1Q1MVlBMDJCUFRPTyZlbmNyeXB0ZWRBZElkPUEwNDc2NzA3M1U0QUhOS0U1VUJYWCZ3aWRnZXROYW1lPXNwX2F0ZiZhY3Rpb249Y2xpY2tSZWRpcmVjdCZkb05vdExvZ0NsaWNrPXRydWU=

  • @ATIWatchReviews
    @ATIWatchReviews 3 роки тому +1

    They should have made the GMT hand in green. keeping it orange doesnt differentiate it from previous

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  3 роки тому +2

      Thank you for watching. Agreed, a green GMT hand would have fitted with it being the 50th anniversary of the Explorer II. It does look very similar to the previous version. Regards, #WR4K

  • @bloodymarvelous4790
    @bloodymarvelous4790 3 місяці тому +2

    You need to do more research before making a video like this.
    Lug width is now 22mm, it was 21 before. The case is unaltered, apart from the increase in lug width which made the lugs slimmer.
    The clasp is not made by Steel INOX. Steel INOX means stainless steel, from the French inoxydable.
    The dial has a matte finish, where it was glossy before. That explains the reduced reflectivity. As far as I'm aware there is no anti-reflective coating applied to any Rolex. AR coating has a purple sheen which is easy to identify when looking through the crystal at an oblique angle. Rolex watches don't have a purple sheen. Omega watches do.
    Also, the orange GMT hand now has a matte finish. On the Polar version all black paint is now matte instead of glossy.

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  3 місяці тому +1

      "That explains the reduced reflectivity. As far as I'm aware there is no anti-reflective coating applied to any Rolex."
      The Daytona has had AR coating since 2007. AR coating is used on post-2020 models including; Oyster Perpetual, Submariner, Submariner Date, Explorer, Explorer II, GMT Master II.
      "AR coating has a purple sheen which is easy to identify when looking through the crystal at an oblique angle."
      AR coating can be clear, or blue.
      This piece has AR coating.
      Apologies for the error regarding the 22mm lug width. I produced 412 videos in 3 years, a massive body of work. There are a plethora of verbal, and visual mistakes in my videos. Unlike many other watch channels I do not edit out mistakes to appear flawless; I leave them in.
      "You need to do more research before making a video like this."
      See my Mondani Rolex book reviews. I did research prior to my Rolex reviews.
      I also measured, and weighed every piece reviewed. Therefore ironically I knew the lug width was 22mm, but erroneously stated 21mm as it stuck in my mind for some reason.
      I am aware "acier inox" means stainless steel.
      Steel is a metal alloy comprised of iron with addition of carbon.
      A very little quantity of carbon transforms iron in steel.
      Then, different components are added in modern steels to improve its characteristics depending in the use to be given to steel (cutlery, firearms, automobile industry, indusrial application, etc)
      Around 1915, and by accidental discovery, atributed to David Breadsley of Sheffield England, a steel variant highly resistant to oxide attack was discovered.
      Some gun barrels, with experimental contents of other components, was stored in the outside of facilities, and it was discovered that some were little affected by humidity than others.
      It was investigated the different contents, and then found that those who had more than 14% of chrome, were more resistant.
      Industrial use of inox steel begun around 1919, after WWI
      Modern inox steels, have about 14 -17% chrome content.
      The word "Inox" meaning "non oxide" (no rust) in popular use.
      No steel is completely rustless, as with enough exposure to elements, or to certain conditions, they get rusted anyway. But some other component additions to alloy better this resistance.
      Stainless Steel is a better description, though I would say "highly resistant to rust" is better than "inox".
      Regards, #WR4K

    • @anima89x
      @anima89x 3 місяці тому +2

      You need to do yours. The dial is glossy and it does have AR on the underside.

  • @forextrader9110
    @forextrader9110 2 роки тому +1

    Ciao John
    Preso sul mercato grigio perché impossibile averlo con AD Rolex
    Pagato 3k più del listino
    Mi piace troppo non mi importa aver pagato 3000€ in più, pensi sia cmq un.buon prezzo?
    Ciao

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  2 роки тому +1

      Grazie per aver guardato. Sì, è un buon prezzo. Saluti, #WR4K

  • @gyrovague
    @gyrovague 3 роки тому

    Steel Inox isn't their bracelet manufacturer, it means 'Stainless Steel' in french.

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  3 роки тому +2

      Thank your for watching. You are mistaken. Stainless steel in French is; acier inoxydable. Steelinox is a Dutch company that produces specialist stainless steel. (See link below). Rolex use "Steelinox" stainless steel to make their clasps; hence engraving "Steelinox" on the clasps. Regards, #WR4K
      www.steelinox.nl/en

    • @1977JohnBoy
      @1977JohnBoy 2 роки тому +1

      what is getting owned in french?

    • @bloodymarvelous4790
      @bloodymarvelous4790 3 місяці тому

      @@watchreviews4k Unfortunately for you, Rolex makes its own steel. The brand name Steelinox comes from the Steel INOX designator, not the other way around.

  • @michaelbishop9157
    @michaelbishop9157 3 роки тому +3

    i much preferred the previous floating hands. I think they made a mistake in dropping those hands

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you for watching Michael. Regards, #WR4K

  • @joseoliver534
    @joseoliver534 2 роки тому +3

    Industrial series watches for 12000? Youre serious?it is time for the people to be reasonable and boycott this gangsters brand

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  2 роки тому +1

      Thank you for watching Jose. Regards, #WR4K

  • @tkqhmontongara2883
    @tkqhmontongara2883 Рік тому

    00

  • @bzee3717
    @bzee3717 2 роки тому +3

    Investment piece
    What a joke, nothing unique or rare

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  2 роки тому +3

      Thank you for watching. Rolexes that are produced in the 50th anniversary years are always strong investment pieces. The 2003 Kermit, and 2017 Sea-Dweller, for example. Regards, #WR4K

    • @bzee3717
      @bzee3717 2 роки тому +3

      @@watchreviews4k incorrect, Kermit is just riding the stainless steel hype train.
      Stop with this investment nonsense, there is hype behind the brand. There is nothing special about an explorer II that is mass produced and machine made
      You know it

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  2 роки тому +4

      @@bzee3717 You are mistaken, all 50th anniversary year pieces are strong investments. The 2003 Flat 4 is specifically sought after by collectors due to be being the 50th anniversary piece of the first 1953 Rolex 6204 Submariner. In my reply I specified the 2003 Kermit. I did not refer to the other Kermit models produced later. This Explorer II is special, because it was produced in the 50th anniversary year of the first 1971 1655 Explorer II. Collectors seek these 50th anniversary year pieces. Regards, #WR4K

    • @bzee3717
      @bzee3717 2 роки тому +3

      @@watchreviews4k flat 4 is an exception to the rule and you know that.
      Like I said this Explorer II in particular is not investment grade, stop trying to hype up a watch that will be mass produced for years.
      Now if you want “an investment watch” review the overseas that’s limited to 150 watches
      Not a mass produced machine made Rolex

    • @watchreviews4k
      @watchreviews4k  2 роки тому +4

      @@bzee3717 You are mistaken. All 50th anniversary year Rolexes are strong investment pieces. Regards, #WR4K