This is relates back to my original point about the using of voice-over parts as a crutch. Ensembles are starting to do shows about crazy things, like quantum physics, and that's exactly my point. I personally feel a show shouldn't be about any theory or anything the audience could know nothing about. Norristown, you're an AWESOME ensemble, for sure. I just am not a fan of this type of show.
Yeah, I totally understand, but part of my questioning of this performance is what significance is her part on the show itself? If you say it's just for the scientific aspect, then what's even the point? Lol. I totally understand why she is necessary for the audience's understanding of the basis on which the show is built, but I do not understand why the audience needs to know anything about quantum physics or Einstein's theory of general relativity to enjoy a show.
All I'm saying is that I'm seeing in indoor ensembles and also outdoor a particular liking to voice parts of the show. A little bit is all right, but it seems to start to become a crutch. Like here, the girls speaks before every change in mood and before almost every phrase. It almost insults the viewer's intelligence to tell him or her what mood the ensemble is trying to portray. Let the viewer figure it out through MUSIC.
Not going to lie- not what I was expecting. It was good, nonetheless, but your drill and your music didn't really portray what that annoying voice was saying. I'd say it would have been better without her. No offense. :)
That's crazy I was in the stands to the right of the camera all the way on the end of the stands!
Hey guys, i watched your show Saturday at wildwood and it was AMAZING! you guys deserved first place! We got the same Bullshit penalty as you :/
Is that "Tom Sawyer" towards the end? Pretty awesome!
Yup, It is!
yooooo. good shit.
I wish my IPE would take as much use of their cymbals as this one.
Frakctured! Elektrik! It's all in there!
We had a wet mat. Leaving debris
Exactly what I just said. :)
it always is :P
This is relates back to my original point about the using of voice-over parts as a crutch. Ensembles are starting to do shows about crazy things, like quantum physics, and that's exactly my point. I personally feel a show shouldn't be about any theory or anything the audience could know nothing about. Norristown, you're an AWESOME ensemble, for sure. I just am not a fan of this type of show.
Yeah, I totally understand, but part of my questioning of this performance is what significance is her part on the show itself? If you say it's just for the scientific aspect, then what's even the point? Lol. I totally understand why she is necessary for the audience's understanding of the basis on which the show is built, but I do not understand why the audience needs to know anything about quantum physics or Einstein's theory of general relativity to enjoy a show.
Mic check...1 2 3 4
-- AD INFINITUM
WTF?!
All I'm saying is that I'm seeing in indoor ensembles and also outdoor a particular liking to voice parts of the show. A little bit is all right, but it seems to start to become a crutch. Like here, the girls speaks before every change in mood and before almost every phrase. It almost insults the viewer's intelligence to tell him or her what mood the ensemble is trying to portray. Let the viewer figure it out through MUSIC.
CHIMES!!
The music and playing is great, the narration is dumb.
Not going to lie- not what I was expecting. It was good, nonetheless, but your drill and your music didn't really portray what that annoying voice was saying. I'd say it would have been better without her. No offense. :)