A nightmare. An engine with a capacity of ONE liter... what environmentalists take an internal combustion engine to. It seems we will never see new two-liter engines again at this rate
1.0l☠I wonder why they even put an engine inside the car, after 5 years if we're not full EV already I guess they'll produce 0.5l engines. This is a major NO. 1.0 110hp and when u put the AC ON u can't overtake even a bicycle. EDIT: Anyway, thanks for the another great POV!
@@alexandrutimofti8596 you guys are over exaggerating things. I had a mk5 golf with 1.6 fsi engine 115 hp, it had 10.5 seconds 0-100 and 198 max speed, then a 1.2tsi turbo 90hp polo, it had about the same figures but with much better economy and pulling power. Small turbo engines are quite good nowadays, they give their max torque at very low rpm's, which means they pull great at any time including steep hills. They don't need to do high revs for max hp so they are quiet and has good mileage. A 1 liter turbo engine is equivalent to a 1.6 natural aspirated one, a 1.5 turbo is better than a 2 liter natural aspirated and so. I also like big engines but I'd take any turbo engine to a natural aspirated one unless I'm living in the states and gas is dirt cheap so cars with humongous engines not being efficien't is not an issue at all.
@@arturasj4607 weird, my non-economical 1.0tsi 81kw has long term consumption of 5.7l/100km.(normal driving, not focusing on consumption) 8.5/100 is only achievable when i'm driving it like 180km/h on highway or in a city on 2nd gear all the time. And I believe it could be much lower if I tried and drove like a grandpa (tried it once, was boring but after 200km consumption was on 4.2/100)
1,6 atmospheric are not in market anymore , its only good this 1 liter at open road driving, faster driving eats more fuel then 2-3 liter engines much stronger , this engine eats much more fuel then 2 liter tfsi 150hp @@ozgundemirr
@@Mr11ESSE111 That's not true, a lot of natural aspirated engines like 1.2,1.4,1.6 are still sold all around the europe. Check psa, vag group, hyundai etc. I don't know what do you mean for open road driving but for city driving small turbo engines are great. For autobahn they don't consume much too unless you are doing high speed constantly, 2.0 tfsi 211hp engine is a very old engine that is not been used in europe for quite a long time, it is strong but burns a lot fuel, latest 1.5tsi engines has better values than it and consume much less, almost half. And by experience I know this a 1lt tsi would never consume as high as a 2lt tfsi in any condition. Back to the topic I'd get a 1.5tsi octavia if I could but I would still be happy with 1 liter tsi too.
![2024 Skoda Octavia [ Elegance 1.0 TSI 110hp ] | POV Test Drive | Interior ambient lights](/img/n.gif)
The 1.0tsi is one of the most reliable 3-Cylinders on the market, you can easily find examples above 250,000km even some over 300,000km
😂😂
1.9 TDI's with 800.000 km are laughing at this
@@trafficobservationsinitaly9662 Diesel owners all laugh at this, but for a VW petrol that's quite good.
Nice car, something like baby-superb 😉
A nightmare. An engine with a capacity of ONE liter... what environmentalists take an internal combustion engine to. It seems we will never see new two-liter engines again at this rate
Yea. Forget about engines that last forever..
Cope. Golf has had a 1.0 tsi for 7 years now and people have no issues with it. Its slow but it works.
lol it comes with a 2 liter option 😂
Plenty of power in them
1.0l☠I wonder why they even put an engine inside the car, after 5 years if we're not full EV already I guess they'll produce 0.5l engines. This is a major NO. 1.0 110hp and when u put the AC ON u can't overtake even a bicycle.
EDIT: Anyway, thanks for the another great POV!
I drove a Octavia MK3 1.6 MPI, it was slower than the bicycle… also 110 hp
@@alexandrutimofti8596 you guys are over exaggerating things. I had a mk5 golf with 1.6 fsi engine 115 hp, it had 10.5 seconds 0-100 and 198 max speed, then a 1.2tsi turbo 90hp polo, it had about the same figures but with much better economy and pulling power. Small turbo engines are quite good nowadays, they give their max torque at very low rpm's, which means they pull great at any time including steep hills. They don't need to do high revs for max hp so they are quiet and has good mileage. A 1 liter turbo engine is equivalent to a 1.6 natural aspirated one, a 1.5 turbo is better than a 2 liter natural aspirated and so. I also like big engines but I'd take any turbo engine to a natural aspirated one unless I'm living in the states and gas is dirt cheap so cars with humongous engines not being efficien't is not an issue at all.
Is it worth it to upgrade the 10inch display to the 13inch?
Yes
8.5l /100km/h is too much
It's as it's ...
These 1.0 and 1.5 TSI engines are economical only on paper, but not real driving conditions.
@@arturasj4607 weird, my non-economical 1.0tsi 81kw has long term consumption of 5.7l/100km.(normal driving, not focusing on consumption) 8.5/100 is only achievable when i'm driving it like 180km/h on highway or in a city on 2nd gear all the time. And I believe it could be much lower if I tried and drove like a grandpa (tried it once, was boring but after 200km consumption was on 4.2/100)
Winter conditions and probably winter tires... Average consumption...On summer maybe less
this engine are joke on this size of vehicle and automatic transmission ,oh, it make it expensive and high fuel eater only with shitty performance
1 liter tsi has better performance than 1.6 atmoshperic engines. It is adequate for everyday use and has good economy.
1,6 atmospheric are not in market anymore , its only good this 1 liter at open road driving, faster driving eats more fuel then 2-3 liter engines much stronger , this engine eats much more fuel then 2 liter tfsi 150hp @@ozgundemirr
@@Mr11ESSE111 That's not true, a lot of natural aspirated engines like 1.2,1.4,1.6 are still sold all around the europe. Check psa, vag group, hyundai etc. I don't know what do you mean for open road driving but for city driving small turbo engines are great. For autobahn they don't consume much too unless you are doing high speed constantly, 2.0 tfsi 211hp engine is a very old engine that is not been used in europe for quite a long time, it is strong but burns a lot fuel, latest 1.5tsi engines has better values than it and consume much less, almost half. And by experience I know this a 1lt tsi would never consume as high as a 2lt tfsi in any condition. Back to the topic I'd get a 1.5tsi octavia if I could but I would still be happy with 1 liter tsi too.
1,6 are not in VW cars @@ozgundemirr
Don't like skoda.
Why?
1l engine , what a piece of trash
It's quite good actually.