Tucker's point was comparing Russia's biggest city to our biggest city which is littered and ripe with crime while Moscow was a beautiful city that was clean.
People appreciate you, Bryan. You have been putting out great content. You are in my opinion, above your peers and friends who have more . Its because they give less of themselves. You are the champion of the average man that has more heart and pours it out.
Great work Callen!!!. So much better show. Your intro great subtle inviting. The show name superb. The topics and guest, Amazing Thank you. Keeping the conversation going and letting the guest speak without talking to much, is what separates and makes the best shows. Hope I see you back in film. I think the trama you went through, will guide you into doing serious roles. You shouldn't just focus on comedic acting. Your comedy is perfection. In acting you're past that. Think Robin Williams when he did serious roles. His pain came through epic. You have had pain now. I hope to see you use it on the big screen.
How we known Putin wants Eastern Europe is manifold. First, he has said so, numerous times, for 20 years, and said so before the invasion. Second, Russian history is a long series of protracted military campaign to secure the entrances to the steppe lands that are the heart of Russian power going back to the 14th century. This isn’t propaganda, this is geography and history. Read a book. Don’t be dumb. Lastly, this is like the 9th or 10th war since the fall of the USSR and each one has been to move Russian troops closer to the entry gaps of the steppe. From the Russian point of view it makes sense. Poor internal transportation, open terrain, lack of defensible hard points once the gaps are open. Doesn’t mean it’s right, doesn’t mean it’s just or that we should allow it or fight it. There is a reason Poland keeps getting g carved up by the Russians every couple generations and it isn’t a dispute over vodka. It’s geographic imperative and a bit of historical animosity dating back to the decade when the PLC conquered Moscow….
Who cares about "revolution", what do you know about carjitsu? You like wrestling? You like grappling? You like small spaces? Lucky for you carjitsu exist. Carjitsu championships. I've seen full grown men swing swords at each other in full armor, I've seen 5 vs 5 MMA matches, I've seen global anything goes matches, but carjitsu, peak wtf am I watching. Just know somewhere in the world, there are 2 people wrestling in a car for a championship belt. I didn't look for it, it was presented to me. Thank you for your time.
The term "democracy" should make everyone cringe in any context. Why? Because a pure democracy is the deviant form of rule by many (i.e., mobocracy). There is a terrific UA-cam series on Law & Justice produced by the Univ. of Oklahoma. In one episode (see ua-cam.com/video/JezROEVKJQQ/v-deo.htmlsi=TSVHRf6xBZ5TfcOx), Aristotle's analysis of constitutions is discussed. Have you ever heard of the word “polity” (a root word for politics, politicians, etc.)? This video is where one will more than likely hear the word "polity" for the first time. It gets even more intriguing when one tries to find a clear definition of the term. The bottom line -- there isn't one. Most dictionaries vaguely define it as "a form of government" which tells you nothing. So what if a polity gets boiled down to this -- if a pure democracy is essentially bamboozling a simple 50.1% of the majority populous class with zero protection for the 49.9% of the minority individual class -- then a polity has to be a 75.1% super majority where one also has to convince half or 25% of the minority to go along with the simple majority. In other words, the interests of any group have to align with: (1) the pure majority interest; and (2) the majority of the minority interests (see drive.proton.me/urls/7DBD2RH3Y8#k7rX93LpSus4). The former is easy to achieve as communism, socialism, and pure democracies have proven with "trickle up death and despair" based on the “land of free stuff” premise to gain and keep political power. It is quite the opposite of "trickle down economics" from capitalism coupled with strong labor laws where achieving the latter is practically impossible unless the “land of the free” policy benefits both the pure majority and the majority of the minority. - America’s founding fathers knew that pure democracies were disastrous, so they designed a polity (i.e., a constitutional republic) centered on the premise of a super majority. First example, a bicameral legislature where the House of Representatives (HoR) represents the pure majority interests and the Senate represents the majority of minority interests. Second example, constitutional amendments can only be ratified when 3/4 or a super majority of the states ratify the admendment. And third example, the President and Vice President have to win a pure majority of the populous vote within each state and the majority of a combined large and small populated states or more than half of the states electoral college votes. - The ultimate goal should be to get others to cringe when they read or hear phrases like "[blank] is an existential threat to our democracy" or "the future of America's democracy is under attack" -- America is a constitutional republic premised on a very objective super majority polity paradigm!
![[UA] Eternal Fire проти NAVI | EPL Season 20 Malta](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/chvlsDygrZM/mqdefault.jpg)
I see why bryan hasnt been on conspiracy social club for so long… he’d have to admit he now knows sam was right about everything 😉
amazing show b
I liked this episode
Love you Bryan ❤
Why doesn't south America become apart of the USA
Ya doughgoat
Tenminpod
Tucker's point was comparing Russia's biggest city to our biggest city which is littered and ripe with crime while Moscow was a beautiful city that was clean.
So was Berlin during the 1936 Olympics… It’s all a show
Very shallow
yes, Trump 2024 obviously
After Joe Biden, everyone’s voting for Trump
This guy is wrong on a LOT of things. Bryan need Tripoli here.
People appreciate you, Bryan. You have been putting out great content. You are in my opinion, above your peers and friends who have more . Its because they give less of themselves. You are the champion of the average man that has more heart and pours it out.
Very well said
Couldn’t agree more. 🤙🏼
Man 🐉
Ahh shut up he’s just a person jeez
Such a strange commment. Very bizarre and empty feeling
Great work Callen!!!. So much better show. Your intro great subtle inviting. The show name superb. The topics and guest, Amazing Thank you. Keeping the conversation going and letting the guest speak without talking to much, is what separates and makes the best shows. Hope I see you back in film. I think the trama you went through, will guide you into doing serious roles. You shouldn't just focus on comedic acting. Your comedy is perfection. In acting you're past that. Think Robin Williams when he did serious roles. His pain came through epic. You have had pain now. I hope to see you use it on the big screen.
It's sad that Bryan can't hear facts out of Sam's mouth
But..... Bryan's dad was/is part of CFR, so I trust nothing this guy says. He is a really good Hollywood actor.
You judge a person on family affiliation? 😂
Defending Epstein like that is crazy lol
Steve bing was a very nice guy...matt...
These guys are super smart! I felt like shit after watching Complicated Apes! lol very thought provoking!
America really fucked it up for all of us
Great content
Awesome interview Brian. Yours and some other podcasts are giving us something to trust again. Never will I go back to mainstream media🙏
How we known Putin wants Eastern Europe is manifold. First, he has said so, numerous times, for 20 years, and said so before the invasion. Second, Russian history is a long series of protracted military campaign to secure the entrances to the steppe lands that are the heart of Russian power going back to the 14th century. This isn’t propaganda, this is geography and history. Read a book. Don’t be dumb. Lastly, this is like the 9th or 10th war since the fall of the USSR and each one has been to move Russian troops closer to the entry gaps of the steppe. From the Russian point of view it makes sense. Poor internal transportation, open terrain, lack of defensible hard points once the gaps are open. Doesn’t mean it’s right, doesn’t mean it’s just or that we should allow it or fight it. There is a reason Poland keeps getting g carved up by the Russians every couple generations and it isn’t a dispute over vodka. It’s geographic imperative and a bit of historical animosity dating back to the decade when the PLC conquered Moscow….
Matt's not, ur son? 😌
Keep em’ comin’!
SUCH AN IMPORTANT PODCAST. I really loved listening to this one. You guys are awesome !!! 🇺🇸
How much did they pay you for that post?
Who cares about "revolution", what do you know about carjitsu? You like wrestling? You like grappling? You like small spaces? Lucky for you carjitsu exist. Carjitsu championships. I've seen full grown men swing swords at each other in full armor, I've seen 5 vs 5 MMA matches, I've seen global anything goes matches, but carjitsu, peak wtf am I watching. Just know somewhere in the world, there are 2 people wrestling in a car for a championship belt. I didn't look for it, it was presented to me. Thank you for your time.
Haha if shooting from the hip had a podcast 😂
The term "democracy" should make everyone cringe in any context. Why? Because a pure democracy is the deviant form of rule by many (i.e., mobocracy). There is a terrific UA-cam series on Law & Justice produced by the Univ. of Oklahoma. In one episode (see ua-cam.com/video/JezROEVKJQQ/v-deo.htmlsi=TSVHRf6xBZ5TfcOx), Aristotle's analysis of constitutions is discussed.
Have you ever heard of the word “polity” (a root word for politics, politicians, etc.)? This video is where one will more than likely hear the word "polity" for the first time. It gets even more intriguing when one tries to find a clear definition of the term. The bottom line -- there isn't one.
Most dictionaries vaguely define it as "a form of government" which tells you nothing. So what if a polity gets boiled down to this -- if a pure democracy is essentially bamboozling a simple 50.1% of the majority populous class with zero protection for the 49.9% of the minority individual class -- then a polity has to be a 75.1% super majority where one also has to convince half or 25% of the minority to go along with the simple majority. In other words, the interests of any group have to align with: (1) the pure majority interest; and (2) the majority of the minority interests (see drive.proton.me/urls/7DBD2RH3Y8#k7rX93LpSus4).
The former is easy to achieve as communism, socialism, and pure democracies have proven with "trickle up death and despair" based on the “land of free stuff” premise to gain and keep political power. It is quite the opposite of "trickle down economics" from capitalism coupled with strong labor laws where achieving the latter is practically impossible unless the “land of the free” policy benefits both the pure majority and the majority of the minority.
- America’s founding fathers knew that pure democracies were disastrous, so they designed a polity (i.e., a constitutional republic) centered on the premise of a super majority. First example, a bicameral legislature where the House of Representatives (HoR) represents the pure majority interests and the Senate represents the majority of minority interests. Second example, constitutional amendments can only be ratified when 3/4 or a super majority of the states ratify the admendment. And third example, the President and Vice President have to win a pure majority of the populous vote within each state and the majority of a combined large and small populated states or more than half of the states electoral college votes.
- The ultimate goal should be to get others to cringe when they read or hear phrases like "[blank] is an existential threat to our democracy" or "the future of America's democracy is under attack" -- America is a constitutional republic premised on a very objective super majority polity paradigm!