Why YouTube Sponsors Are (Almost) Always Terrible

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,4 тис.

  • @Micro-Econ-YT
    @Micro-Econ-YT  20 днів тому +3197

    This video was made possible by [Insert sponsor name here] sign up now for 20% off your retirement savings!

    • @seeblu
      @seeblu 19 днів тому +134

      I called the head office at [insert sponsor name here], they had never heard of you

    • @TheOneWhoMightBe
      @TheOneWhoMightBe 19 днів тому +84

      Sorry, but i got an offer for 100% off my kids college fund in exchange for a hyperlink to a unique but screenshottable picture that may or may not still exist 6 months from now.

    • @7Naur7
      @7Naur7 19 днів тому +5

      ha, hope you dont shitflate ;D realy nice channel and growing(i hope)
      btw i think services like wt -normal sponsor.Yes we joking about it scripts but its work and i persanaly have fun in this game some years ago.still wondering what could be wrong with GNews with such large advertising company - funny how any advertising on UA-cam today causes skepticism

    • @haruhisuzumiya6650
      @haruhisuzumiya6650 19 днів тому +9

      This is a black mirror episode waiting to happen

    • @benxiro4293
      @benxiro4293 19 днів тому

      To go even further: i´m a indie author who would love to sponsor videos - but thanks to Established Bullshit & Co the prices which creators are demanding are insane. I know that they have expenses but 3 to 10 k? Come on

  • @CatFish107
    @CatFish107 18 днів тому +7663

    The single sponsored ad read that I respect was a local New York plumbing business that sponsored a single episode of an ancient history podcast video. " if you live in X, NY, and are in need of a plumber, consider the sponsor of today's episode" and gave a phone number. It was adorable.

    • @ShenDoodles
      @ShenDoodles 17 днів тому +390

      I’ve seen multiple games sponsor Second Wind that are absolutely fantastic. Most notable out of all of these is Shadows of Doubt, a procedurally generated detective game that simulates a huge city full of crime and sets you loose to solve mystery after mystery until you’re either completely sick of it or dead from malnutrition with a big smile on your face. I love sponsors like that because there’s no risk to trying them out.

    • @zellalaing5439
      @zellalaing5439 17 днів тому +284

      That reminds me of a home reno video where the youtuber reallt wanted to promote the builder, but they had enough clients queued up they didnt need to endorsement 😂

    • @cococowboah
      @cococowboah 17 днів тому +121

      If I ever get anywhere with my channel those are the only kind of sponsorships I'd take on, small businesses, or games I actually play. I couldn't even stick it out in the cult I was raised in once I found out the truth about it just to keep my family from shunning me, there's no way I could shill BetterHelp with a straight face even if I wanted to.

    • @ii8283
      @ii8283 16 днів тому +78

      Toldinstone! Also if I remember correctly, that was one of his main channel videos, not a podcast. Could be wrong on that though. I also thought of that one as one of the very few sponsorships I approved of

    • @momoaa
      @momoaa 15 днів тому +62

      ​@@ShenDoodles this is an ad.

  • @countercole1
    @countercole1 15 днів тому +3810

    In the early 2000's I was taught that clicking ads of any kind would give my computer viruses. While that's not 100% accurate, it has helped create the immediate negative response to ads every single time I see one.

    • @tsm688
      @tsm688 15 днів тому +304

      for the early internet it wasn't wrong. everyone was already pretty much immune to ads so nobody advertised except scammers. google kind of cleaned that up for a while, then decided that was way harder than giving up on vetting and printing money. now we're back to all ads being scams again

    • @TKBarnes
      @TKBarnes 14 днів тому

      I've been getting tons of clearly LLM generated ads recently, so I absolutely agree with your lesson. I learned it too early on, but it never became a problem because at the same time, I basically accepted that any shit that cuts into my watched video, is automatically a "I'll never buy this."
      Also, betterhelp is imo the worst offender. Its not their fault completely, but the idea of health as a product, especially mental health, is horrifying to me.

    • @crisgriffin3042
      @crisgriffin3042 14 днів тому

      Same. Yet sheep are still clicking on ads like there is no tomorrow. Otherwise they wouldn't be all over the place on every website, inventing new crazy workarounds against pop-up blockers.
      It's like someone said: "stupid people should have a way to pay for their stupidity". If people don't care enough to learn, let the economical Darwinism take the initiative.

    • @Taladar2003
      @Taladar2003 14 днів тому

      @@tsm688 On the contrary, in the early internet clicking ads was relatively safe because they were passive banners. Today even showing ads is a security risk.

    • @sunbleachedangel
      @sunbleachedangel 11 днів тому

      Outside of UA-cam that's true 99.9% of the time. You'll either get a real virus or a fake virus with a scam call center

  • @yeet-lj3dr
    @yeet-lj3dr 14 днів тому +2250

    the ones promoting betterhelp whilst knowing they have a vulnerable audience and saying they use it themselves when they're a youtuber with enough money to pay 5 therapists to listen to them yap at once is what's most egregious to me. that's people's mental health you're toying with for the sake of a video sponsor.

    • @mynameisambertoo7379
      @mynameisambertoo7379 12 днів тому +252

      It’s the same when they promote those meal kit subscriptions and specifically mention it’s “affordable” and reduce “waste”.

    • @jordannoell4222
      @jordannoell4222 12 днів тому

      ​@mynameisambertoo7379 Not really. The degree of harm from betterhelp is significantly more than paying for an overpriced and somewhat wasteful food prep service. One of them sells your most sensitive medical data to advertisers and has extremely lax standards about their "quality of care", if you can even call it that, and the other charges you 15$ for a single chicken breast and some veggies. One is a waste of money and the other may be an active danger to your wellbeing.

    • @CHRB-nn6qp
      @CHRB-nn6qp 12 днів тому

      Betterhelp ruined my faith in therapy for years. It was only very recently that I finally tried it and started to make progress. To see them still making ads and sponsoring people is nothing short of a kick in the balls

    • @cloudnine.17
      @cloudnine.17 11 днів тому +176

      there was one UA-camr I used to like, he made a video talking about mental health apps and mental health products that didn't actually work and were just taking advantage of the customers. the ridiculous part is in that same video he did a sponsorship for betterhelp, and this is after they had already been outed as a scam.

    • @Eichro
      @Eichro 11 днів тому +20

      I mean it seemed like a good idea before all the controversies struck. You have an audience that needs therapy and there's a sponsor offering you to make their work known.

  • @beckobert
    @beckobert 14 днів тому +1184

    Small correction: the UA-cam algorithm is perfectly capable of telling positive and negative response apart, it just doesn't care, because for UA-cam, engagement is engagement is engagement.

    • @catbatrat1760
      @catbatrat1760 10 днів тому +27

      I'm not sure if you meant to repeat that last part 3 times, but I kinda like it

    • @thedemolitionsexpertsledge5552
      @thedemolitionsexpertsledge5552 8 днів тому +70

      And this is why ‘do not recommend’ features are actually useless in the long term: the algorithm *will* recommend content from the same channel again after a few months, even if you’ve said not to. Your engagement is UA-cam’s money, and they don’t care if you love it or hate it, only that you interact.

    • @tonn333
      @tonn333 6 днів тому +39

      Now think about UA-cam's decision to remove thumbs down on videos and how it doesn't show how many thumbs down a comment received either..... They knowingly block anything that could bring down the hype....
      Edit: oh and they removed the most damaging, but in my opinion the most helpful feature... Video responses... Back in the day under every video there was a video response section kinda like comments section but UA-cam videos specifically responding to that particular video.

    • @nyet_maker7948
      @nyet_maker7948 4 дні тому

      ​@@thedemolitionsexpertsledge5552 dude thats actually not true!
      I have made the "experiment" for my account and blocken every vontent i dont want to see (political debates, music videos, etc) and have done this for a month straight (actually clicked on the do not 'recommend from this channel' without opening the vid) and i tell you, the algo does clean it self up.
      It does try to sneak in things from time to time, but dont click on it and press "do not recommend" from anything you dont wish to see. Kept me sane through multiple elections (my country and US, because its annoying to listen to people whine, like it matters, as if it was the iron throne).

    • @3nertia
      @3nertia 4 дні тому +9

      @@catbatrat1760 The shortest path to memorization is repetition, repetition, repetition! :D

  • @jwenting
    @jwenting 15 днів тому +1272

    you forget a MAJOR factor in why youtube sponsorships and ads are so often scams or junk products: this is the only way these companies can advertise at all. Advertising standards bodies and consumer protection laws exist precisely to prevent such companies advertising anywhere else!
    But youtube and many of their "creators" couldn't care less, as those same regulations don't apply to them.

    • @ryanjohnson4565
      @ryanjohnson4565 14 днів тому +9

      Say it with me now… 1…2..3.. “darn it.”

    • @kalinmir
      @kalinmir 14 днів тому +41

      I see way more scammy things from google and meta (actual viruses, impersonations...)

    • @KairuHakubi
      @KairuHakubi 14 днів тому +19

      funny how the law applies to youtube only when they decide it does (and they circumvent legal protections and rights to enforce it)

    • @ErmenBlankenberg
      @ErmenBlankenberg 14 днів тому +25

      I see plenty of dusbious and scammy websites and products being advertised on Facebook and Instagram, so I don't think this reasoning really stands

    • @lukeyznaga7627
      @lukeyznaga7627 13 днів тому +3

      this was the most IMPORTANT COMMENT and very TRUTHFUL comment, "jwenting"!! JWENTING is correct. His comment is RIGHT TO THE POINT and explains everything. Thank you, Jwenting!!

  • @WabbitSeeson
    @WabbitSeeson 20 днів тому +5751

    Always feel like im skipping half of the video and they always have the same script too. I just hate that they act like they use it regularly when you know they dont.

    • @Micro-Econ-YT
      @Micro-Econ-YT  20 днів тому +763

      I think there is absolutely a place for it and as long as the sponsors are not shady I understand why UA-camrs take them. But you’re right it’s so much more effective if they are just honest about it.

    • @WabbitSeeson
      @WabbitSeeson 20 днів тому +200

      ​@@Micro-Econ-YTfax. I'm sure most UA-camrs that take sponsors don't consider themselves as sellouts but if you're reading a script for money that's sellout behavior.

    • @scootybooty9626
      @scootybooty9626 19 днів тому

      Look up the sponsor block extension

    • @rodh1404
      @rodh1404 19 днів тому +180

      @@Micro-Econ-YT The problem is that just about every UA-cam sponsor IS shady. Some are worse (much worse) than others, but it's hard to find any of them that are really worthwhile. At the very least, you can usually find a similar product with better quality for a lower price.
      The one type of sponsorship that I do go for sometimes is the one you didn't really mention. That's game sponsorships where the developer has paid for a UA-camr to play their game and feature it on their channel. Often enough, they don't even pay the UA-camr and just gift them a key to their game. It's such an effective method of advertising games that even bigger publishers will sometimes use it.

    • @mr.boomguy
      @mr.boomguy 19 днів тому +36

      Feel like? I always do it. It's the same stuff, I'm not gonna try 99% of it anyway, and like you said, it's just a repeat

  • @marekkedzierski8237
    @marekkedzierski8237 17 днів тому +1121

    UA-cam sponsorships are great, they show you which products you should never buy.

    • @DanKaschel
      @DanKaschel 14 днів тому +46

      Looking at you raycon

    • @John-td7vp
      @John-td7vp 12 днів тому +26

      @@DanKaschel Me, but with Honey

    • @twilightparanormalresearch186
      @twilightparanormalresearch186 2 дні тому

      @@DanKaschelwhy Raycon?

    • @Da_bear-ij9gm
      @Da_bear-ij9gm 2 дні тому

      @@twilightparanormalresearch186terrible customer reviews yet shilled on nearly as many channels as Raid Shadow Legends

    • @gregkareem9824
      @gregkareem9824 2 дні тому +3

      Only ones I think are good is honey and monster legends I think it's called u can actually save money with honey I think no scam there and for monster legends from what I know understand it's literally just a video game app nothing sus or scammy abt that one

  • @realitypoet
    @realitypoet 19 днів тому +3700

    The worst part about quitting my job at Squarespace is that I still have to hear an ad for them like every day on UA-cam lol

    • @elisee9935
      @elisee9935 19 днів тому +59

      why did you quit?

    • @sirBrouwer
      @sirBrouwer 19 днів тому

      @@elisee9935 to go work at Roundplaza

    • @johan13135
      @johan13135 19 днів тому +142

      Why the hell aren't you using Adblockers?

    • @fb2433
      @fb2433 19 днів тому

      @@johan13135 squarespace ads are from the content creator themselves, not ads from youtube

    • @realitypoet
      @realitypoet 19 днів тому

      @johan13135 I pay for UA-cam premium so I never see ads. I’m talking about sponsorships read by the creators. You know, the topic of the video I’m commenting under. I guess I should have said “sponsorship read” but o figured the context made it clear, and I think of sponsorship reads as ads, because they are.

  • @willia_music
    @willia_music 16 днів тому +1089

    I respect the youtubers that put an "ad" chapter and change their tone of voice when doing an ad.
    It satisfies the sponsor while giving a nod to the actual fans

    • @unclejoeljoestar988
      @unclejoeljoestar988 15 днів тому +176

      I love it when Karl Jobst shills Raid Shadow Legend. He sounds so apathetic like he's being held at gunpoint, that it comes off as a genuine "I hate it, but this pays the bills" impression

    • @greensoldier2142
      @greensoldier2142 15 днів тому +135

      I've noticed some who talk in front of a camera, tend to change their shirts for the duration of the ad, then change back to their normal one after it

    • @nojerama788
      @nojerama788 14 днів тому +99

      Some folks run a timer for the ad and show it on screen, or pull a Caddicarus and have it presented as part of a completely pathetic skit that is blatantly a piss take

    • @megaminum8325
      @megaminum8325 14 днів тому +65

      ​@@greensoldier2142if I had to guess, that's probably because the add read was filmed at a later date then the rest of the video

    • @Jane-oz7pp
      @Jane-oz7pp 14 днів тому +27

      ​@@nojerama788 lol like Mr Beast, except the timer is skewed and designed to trick you into committing to the ad because it's "not so long"

  • @borrago
    @borrago 14 днів тому +521

    I found out that better help was bullshit when I paid them and THEN they told me that in a pool of thousands of 'therapists' they didn't have even a SINGLE board certified pyschologist or psychiatrist. Not a single one. Not even a medical director for the organisation.

    • @moch.farisdzulfiqar6123
      @moch.farisdzulfiqar6123 13 днів тому +50

      Man, as a Psychology graduated bachelor, who know some counselling and therapy technique but didn't have any certifications, I felt cheated. Some of my friends insisted to get counselling sessions with me, but I keep advised them to seek professional help even if it didn't feel any different from what I do. Counselling and psychotherapy are quite expensive for an average Indonesian working class, while at the same time there are few practitioner in the whole country and mostly available at the major city.

    • @nickalotdegit
      @nickalotdegit 13 днів тому +10

      I'm now super suspicious of any channel that currently advertises them, but also any channel that has advertised, quits their agreement (so they don't ad' them any further) and *doesn't* tell people they used to take their money. I can think of a Channel that reviewed movies, and one of the hosts is a practicing therapist. No word from tgem that they used to be sponsored by B.H.

    • @horrorhotel1999
      @horrorhotel1999 12 днів тому +9

      ​@@nickalotdegit why? Do you actually feel that youtubers have a responsibility towards you to screen the products they are advertising?
      I think that's weird af - do you actually trust an ad to be in your best interest if it is aired on a semi-credible platform?😂

    • @chriswest6988
      @chriswest6988 12 днів тому

      ​@@horrorhotel1999I'm not the person you asked but I'd maybe say yes but only in severe cases? Like if a channel told me Fruzzums brand cookies are delicious and I buy some and hate them, and it turns out so do most people, that just comes with the territory. A lot of ads make unproven, misleading, but ultimately subjective claims to get you to try the product. If however they tell me Fruzzums brand cookies are delicious and it turns out they don't exist and the website steals my credit card, yeah I think they had some responsibility to prevent that.
      I think my personal line is that if I'm harmed beyond just the loss of the product sticker price, I'd be upset at them for doing that sponsorship. If I get lead poisoning or my friend gets hooked on ketamine (a thing I've seriously seen advertised on UA-cam but not directly by creators), that's about where I start blaming the platform and the individual pitch men to some extent.

    • @flux.aeterna
      @flux.aeterna 11 днів тому +23

      One of the people on that channel is a therapist and as a care provider is obligated to do no harm to the populace when advising on related care. Sponsoring B.H. blatantly violates those ethical guidelines.

  • @ookjannesplanting1296
    @ookjannesplanting1296 19 днів тому +1746

    The fact that usually you hear about a sponsor everywhere and then suddenly never anymore after a few months clued me in pretty quickly that anything that sponsors a yt vid isn't worth the effort

    • @Ushio01
      @Ushio01 19 днів тому

      BetterHelp has been owned by Teladoc Health since 2015 who were founded on 2002 and are part of Telehealth Access for America with the American Medical Association (AMA), American Hospital Association (AHA), AARP, Amazon, Walmart and CVS. They aren't small.
      The same with Dollar Shave Club that has been owned by Unilever sice 2016.
      HelloFresh was founded in 2011 in Germany and has been publically listed since 2017.
      All startups start as unknowns and UA-cam is fucking huge it's 10.6% of all US TV viewing now (that's more than Amazon Prime Video, Max, Disney+, Peacock and Paramount+ combined! and that's before mobile and computer usage!)
      Not all the UA-cam sponsors are fly by night companies.
      Though supplement, NFT, crypto and finacial stuff should obviously be avoided.

    • @santinosalamanca4378
      @santinosalamanca4378 16 днів тому +101

      yeah
      I swear raid shadow legends has just disappeared from earth (good)

    • @KasumiRINA
      @KasumiRINA 15 днів тому +60

      its like MLM, those products aren't sold in shops because they aren't competitive...

    • @malum9478
      @malum9478 15 днів тому +56

      anybody remember _lootcrate?_

    • @Bargate
      @Bargate 14 днів тому +28

      Yeah ive honestly been surprised that the amount of sponsorships havent gone down because of this. I feel like basically everyone skips past the sponsorship and no one buys it.

  • @MateusChristopher
    @MateusChristopher 19 днів тому +4059

    1st Gen UA-camrs were terrified of ads. Eventually it turned into "I only take on ads that I care about" and now the newest guys will shill anything because just like your favorite TV channel they have to shill anything

    • @nunomartins2209
      @nunomartins2209 19 днів тому +508

      Nowadays u have UA-camrs doing anti fraud videos, and then in the middle sponsor a fraud

    • @kenon6968
      @kenon6968 19 днів тому +106

      That's some nice revisionism most OG UA-camrs were scared that they weren't getting any AdSense, not that they were playing ads on their stupid videos, or worse yet the people were using Adblock so that we wouldn't have to listen to them and they wouldn't get their cut

    • @arsonisticdelphox807
      @arsonisticdelphox807 19 днів тому +29

      Me having to skip the beginning of Papa Meat's videos

    • @DavidCruickshank
      @DavidCruickshank 19 днів тому +204

      @@kenon6968 It's not "revisionism " you just didn't read their comment properly. They're not talking about Adsense, they're talking about sponsorship ads. If someone did a modern sponsorship on OG youtube, you'd be repeatedly attacked for being a "sell out".

    • @asmrtpop2676
      @asmrtpop2676 18 днів тому +21

      Well, the majority of them don’t have to. They could, like, get a normal job like the rest of us viewers do.

  • @PXAbstraction
    @PXAbstraction 18 днів тому +2230

    I have a simple rule: If a UA-camr is shilling it, I don't want it. This rule has served me very well.

    • @roguebanshee
      @roguebanshee 17 днів тому +53

      That should really be the starting point of everyone.

    • @sethaie
      @sethaie 17 днів тому +110

      bit simpler. If its advertised in social media, stay away

    • @NeedForMadnessSVK
      @NeedForMadnessSVK 17 днів тому

      I like youtube sponsors, that way, if I like the product, I can put "[product name] alternative" into google and buy equivalent product either cheaper, or higher quality for the same price, as those alternatives don't spend 70% of their budget on marketing.

    • @lucemiserlohn
      @lucemiserlohn 16 днів тому +98

      Much simpler: If it's in an ad, wherever, whichever kind, whenever, I don't want it.

    • @jcaesar19871
      @jcaesar19871 16 днів тому +7

      Well, Magic Spoon is pretty good, and so was Dollar Shave Club. And my brother's friend gave him a code for free Hello Fresh meals for a while.

  • @shortycareface9678
    @shortycareface9678 6 днів тому +81

    It will never cease to make me sad that there's a significant amount of people who consider "influencers" their friends

    • @RadioactuveToy
      @RadioactuveToy 2 дні тому +3

      It's really quite sad to see. They are engaging with someone in an unhealthy manner, which promotes acceptance of narcissistic relationship dynamics.

    • @bonkcg2485
      @bonkcg2485 2 дні тому +2

      If there is some form of silver lining to it, at least we know how bad it is and not to repeat these behaviors

  • @sunbleachedangel
    @sunbleachedangel 11 днів тому +78

    Nice to hear at least someone with enough balls to say "No! Your favourite influencer IS to blame!" Because they are

  • @Halucygeno
    @Halucygeno 18 днів тому +1773

    UA-cam sponsors are like an anti-advertisement for me. For example, the underlying concept behind Ground News actually sounds kinda useful, but they get shilled so hard that I'm almost certain they're either garbage or a scam. I don't even feel like looking further into it, I'm that confident they're not worth my time.

    • @christopher9727
      @christopher9727 18 днів тому

      Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven
      There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today
      Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell
      Come to Jesus Christ today
      Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
      Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
      Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
      Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
      Holy Spirit Can give you peace guidance and purpose and the Lord will
      John 3:16-21
      16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
      Mark 1.15
      15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
      2 Peter 3:9
      The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
      Hebrews 11:6
      6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
      Jesus

    • @oafkad
      @oafkad 17 днів тому +157

      Yeah it bums me out. Sounds neat but I don't trust it since it's on YT :p

    • @divestdreamer
      @divestdreamer 17 днів тому +192

      I have the same thoughts with aura. On the surface, they sound really really useful and great but the constant pushing makes me not wanna get it

    • @nancy78811
      @nancy78811 17 днів тому +214

      Ground News has been around since 2018 though and they've only really been on UA-cam the last few years. Maybe they're ok 🤷🏻‍♀️

    • @scrittle
      @scrittle 17 днів тому +15

      Perfectly sums up why I don't recommend it.

  • @blacky7801
    @blacky7801 20 днів тому +2219

    "Its not just you, UA-cams sponsors are almost always terrible"
    I like the guts of starting off the video calling the viewer terrible. Keep up the quality work!

    • @Micro-Econ-YT
      @Micro-Econ-YT  19 днів тому +518

      Haha this gave me a good chuckle. You know what I mean!!

    • @scrittle
      @scrittle 17 днів тому +22

      No, the 'almost' keeps the door ajar to assume there are honest UA-camrs with healthy endorsements. "UA-cam sponsors are always terrible" is the best.

    • @zellalaing5439
      @zellalaing5439 17 днів тому +3

      Thats how it sounded to me too 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @ZmbieTaco
      @ZmbieTaco 17 днів тому +13

      I might be missing something but how the hell does that line call the viewer terrible? If that's a typo then wtf, you've had 2 days with pings and haven't fixed it?

    • @santinosalamanca4378
      @santinosalamanca4378 16 днів тому +15

      ​@@ZmbieTaco that was what i was thinking too
      the comment does not make any sense

  • @HerecomestheCalavera
    @HerecomestheCalavera 17 днів тому +667

    My favorite was when Lootcrate was sponsoring what seemed like every channel. It was so hilarious to watch people unbox that trash and act like they were super excited about. "Oh wow! A Captain America air freshener, nice. And next we have a Superman keychain! Wow this is an awesome box this month guys. Oh and here is the pin for this month that says "Heroes"

    • @TorIverWilhelmsen
      @TorIverWilhelmsen 17 днів тому +12

      Yeah, it seemed ERB for instance were funded by them (and patreons but...)

    • @kyuraki
      @kyuraki 16 днів тому +13

      Haha thanks for the reminder, yea taught me to never fall for it again

    • @Jane-oz7pp
      @Jane-oz7pp 14 днів тому +28

      ngl there was a bit there where every other crate did have something actually of value, but like, still eh 🤷🏼‍♀️
      I can only have so many $200 Deadpool vinyl figurines sitting around.

    • @gafrers
      @gafrers 14 днів тому +19

      Better still were knifes and hatchets in crates opened by cars/motorsport related channels. What am I going to to with them? Changing sparkplus with a knife?😂😂😂 Chopping up the guy that drove faster than me? 😂😂

    • @HeelBJC
      @HeelBJC 14 днів тому +36

      That's why sassy british men like Ashens who opened them and ruthlessly shat on how bad they were gave me such entertainment.

  • @rewboss
    @rewboss 15 днів тому +309

    I experimented with sponsorship deals a few years ago -- never again. It was nearly impossible to find a sponsor I felt genuinely happy about recommending and which was promoting something even remotely relevant to my channel, but even they expected me to violate UA-cam's guidelines and annoy my viewers -- things like putting affiliate links above the fold in video descriptions and 90-second promotions in the middle of the videos ("But before we talk about why the new law is going to impoverish millions of people and provoke a civil war, are you looking for a fun way to learn a new language?").
    The problem is that even if all you really want to do is to earn enough to keep your channel running and to not starve, ad revenue isn't enough unless all your videos are getting millions of views (especially if, like me, you refuse to enable mid-rolls because they're just awful). Which leaves you looking for more revenue streams, and when some company e-mails you to offer you their cash, the path of least resistance is to sign on the dotted line.

    • @gamers_mate5680
      @gamers_mate5680 14 днів тому +9

      Mid-rolls are terrible. I have a personal rule that no video will be longer than 9:59 in length to prevent them. Unfortunately I only recently found out it is actually 8 minutes now and has been for a long time. I recommend using firefox instead of chrome and using ublock origin to block ads. It is the only way an illegal monopoly like google will learn.

    • @rewboss
      @rewboss 13 днів тому

      @@gamers_mate5680 As a creator, I can't condone the use of ad blockers: I have to pay my bills somehow.
      But also as a creator I always disable midrolls on all of my uploads. It's a single click of the mouse.

    • @Vickynger
      @Vickynger 13 днів тому +5

      @@gamers_mate5680 you think theyll LEARN??? lets not be naive

    • @111BAUER111
      @111BAUER111 12 днів тому +11

      Als langjähriger Zuschauer schätze ich deinen Umgang mit Werbung sehr.

    • @TheReconJacob
      @TheReconJacob 12 днів тому +9

      Correct me if I am wrong. But I am pretty sure you can't even disable mid-rolls anymore. Didn't UA-cam implement something a while back where they just enable all ads to "help you out"?

  • @eightymopar
    @eightymopar 14 днів тому +101

    It should be obvious that the majority of these "sponsors" are just the modern day "as seen on tv" scams. Nobody should actually be buying this crap.
    I know thats how alot of youtubers make their living but...still. it should be a content creators duty to properly vet the sponsors they get, and not be out here promoting scams.

    • @Purplefire0796
      @Purplefire0796 13 днів тому +1

      1000000%. yes creators should definally do the same amount of research they do for their video themselves.

    • @CMSonYT
      @CMSonYT 10 днів тому

      How terrible is ground news

  • @ILoveTinfoilHats
    @ILoveTinfoilHats 19 днів тому +671

    What's 50x worse are the undisclosed sponsors, like finance channels promoting pump and dump stocks and coins

    • @kenon6968
      @kenon6968 18 днів тому +18

      @@ILoveTinfoilHats with the SEC being so hamstrung as it is and legislation a generation out of date it is by far the easiest way to make money, with zero legal repercussions

    • @lunarvvolf9606
      @lunarvvolf9606 17 днів тому

      I cannot stand the myriad of financial fraud channels that are allowed to persist. Fuq crypto bozos and their shit coins, nfts, or what ever else those shit slinging monkeys are selling these days..

    • @fdk7014
      @fdk7014 17 днів тому +73

      The golden rule is: anything crypto related is a scam.

    • @mikebarnes2294
      @mikebarnes2294 17 днів тому +39

      Let's not forget finance channels with a bogus chain of comments pumping up how great Jane Smith (or fill in the blank with whoever) advisor is in helping you earn excellent outsized returns.

    • @ILoveTinfoilHats
      @ILoveTinfoilHats 17 днів тому +8

      @mikebarnes2294 those are not entirely the fault of the UA-camr, but UA-cam itself

  • @cron1807
    @cron1807 18 днів тому +521

    Jacksfilms took a sponsorship from Betterhelp after saying he'd never take a sponsorship from them again

    • @TorIverWilhelmsen
      @TorIverWilhelmsen 17 днів тому +159

      "I know I have my principles, but they gave me money."

    • @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714
      @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 16 днів тому +57

      @@TorIverWilhelmsen His principles are for the right price anything, which I actually share, but unlike me his price for doing morally bad things is very low.

    • @jmurray1110
      @jmurray1110 16 днів тому +17

      That needs more context he could have been locked in before it broke and couldn’t leave so if he didn’t it persistently after yes that’s an issue but if it was 1 or 2 videos closely after that’s very different

    • @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714
      @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 16 днів тому +76

      @@jmurray1110 If he was locked in for 2 more video he should have rapidly pumped those out and then apoligised and explained that he had actually been wanting to stop for 2 videos know but the contracts tems where black on white so he had to do 2 more.

    • @jmurray1110
      @jmurray1110 16 днів тому +10

      @@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 that’s fair but unlikely sponsor videos need more time because the sponsers have a tendact to just give them back and tell them it’s not right even if it’s just the segment
      Alternatively editing

  • @GatorInVirtual
    @GatorInVirtual 19 днів тому +1421

    I'm surprised videogames wasnt listed as a category of sponsorships, given raid and genshin being such big memes in the community

    • @serkhetreo2489
      @serkhetreo2489 19 днів тому +4

      Yeah, played raid

    • @random009-09
      @random009-09 19 днів тому +207

      they fall under category of subscriptions cuz of their gacha pay to skip grind garbage.

    • @samphelps856
      @samphelps856 18 днів тому +22

      It's all three in a way

    • @christophsiebert1213
      @christophsiebert1213 18 днів тому

      @@random009-09 I wish I could pay to skip in genshin. But sadly you have to sink in an ungodly amount of time to grind. You get a bit of advantage when paying, but they limit you in the amount of advancing per day. I want pay to skip at points in this grind fest and not waste more of my life away for mind-numbing repetetive processes. And before you ask, I like the world and story of the game, that's why I don't want to stop, it's just the grinding to keep up with high-difficulty stuff, if the rewards entice me.

    • @ShadowOfCicero
      @ShadowOfCicero 18 днів тому +66

      And how many sportstubers are shilling for gambling sites and apps now?

  • @catpoke9557
    @catpoke9557 14 днів тому +126

    What really upsets me is that channels that are otherwise good and very honest still not only accept these sponsors, but pretend to like their product. I've seen so many people claim that they "actually use" and "really enjoy" products nobody would ever use.

    • @RadioactuveToy
      @RadioactuveToy 2 дні тому +6

      I had a college professor tell me that sometimes in order to secure funding for research and animal conservation, they often have to bend the knee to put the needs of the donors over the needs of the animals. Many want to do the right thing, but without a way to make a living or funding, very little progress can be done.

  • @theventuracountyrailfan
    @theventuracountyrailfan 15 днів тому +234

    My family has only used one sponsorship ever: Hello fresh. We got a gift subscription from someone and started subscribing ourselves when it ran out. We canceled after they made the food quality horrible, to the point we would need to buy some of our own ingredients. I would not recommend. By the end the meat was nasty and half of the stuff would come expired.

    • @ZZ-qy5mv
      @ZZ-qy5mv 15 днів тому +50

      There used to be another meal kit company called Plated that I believe came before Hello Fresh. It was so good. The food tasted like something I would get at a trendy restaurant, and I learned how to cook from it. But then it shut down after all these other companies like Blue Apron and Hello Fresh invested so much in marketing. It’s so sad that a legit quality product goes under to their competitors that end up offering horrible products.

    • @locsoluv94
      @locsoluv94 15 днів тому +38

      My biggest issue with them is that we went multiple weeks without any shipment. Like, they would just get lost in the sauce and then I'd have to figure out a different dinner plan for that week. Sure, they would refund me my money, but it was still annoying to not get the thing you ordered.
      Also how impossible it is to stop having them harass you. They still send me stuff in the mail. I still get emails and google ads titled "come back" even though I explicitly told them to remove me from their database.
      The only real positives I got from that is the recipe cards I collected, and some recipes outside of my comfort zone. I still use a few of them from time to time.

    • @Sashko_Dee
      @Sashko_Dee 15 днів тому +34

      I don't get the appeal of these grocery shopper services for the average person. I don't trust some random jabroni to pick out the best produce or the bread that wasn't mangled. Not to mention that you can't ring up your Wagyu beef as bananas at the self checkout. And you pay extra for this privilege.

    • @F3ARtheGERBIL
      @F3ARtheGERBIL 15 днів тому +2

      I've tried some factor meals through some friends and they're actually pretty damn good. Hopefully they can keep it up!

    • @jaex9617
      @jaex9617 15 днів тому +35

      What got me was that every kilogram of food sent 5 kg of packaging waste to the landfill. Why not just have a picnic and dump your trash in the park? 😑

  • @wtdogevb
    @wtdogevb 19 днів тому +846

    bro i didn't realise you were a small channel until I looked down and saw it. seriously high quality for someone who just started.

  • @Lacewise
    @Lacewise 19 днів тому +330

    This has a ton of overlap with celebrity marketing, despite influencers marketing themselves as “not celebrities”.

    • @Avendesora
      @Avendesora 19 днів тому +25

      When they try to call themselves celebrities they almost universally get told to sit tf down because they’re just youtubers lmao

    • @Lacewise
      @Lacewise 18 днів тому +27

      @ that’s true but they’ve made it part of their sales pitch (and you can look up studies that say this works) that they’re not celebrities, they can’t be celebrities, they’re just UA-camrs! So you can trust them! But what’s discussed in the video is 1:1 analogous with Golden Age Hollywood star culture (which has been studied academically). This includes the “oh they sold a scam but how could they know?” And “they needed the money! Their actual job doesn’t pay them enough and they have no job security!”
      Which kind of dehumanizes the people who lost their money on a scam, who presumably have less money than the influencer.
      Regardless, they’re selling themselves as the everyman celebrity and people are buying.

    • @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714
      @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 16 днів тому +9

      Influencers are 100% celebrities. Proper youtubers are neither.

    • @Lacewise
      @Lacewise 15 днів тому +5

      @@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 how do you make the distinction?

    • @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714
      @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 15 днів тому +1

      @@Lacewise By how they act. If they act like out of touch scum than they are the former, if they are normal people they are the later.

  • @mane9228
    @mane9228 19 днів тому +617

    If I see a sponsor in a video and feel interrupted, I will absolutely boycott their product

  • @jaloswaggons2182
    @jaloswaggons2182 16 днів тому +181

    I always find terrible irony when channels that focus on being informative clearly read from a sponsor script and lie about using the product themselves. How can I trust a video essay on a complicated topic if the video literally started with them lying to my face? It's ridiculous

    • @queuedjar4578
      @queuedjar4578 14 днів тому +7

      It usually also means they're reading a script based entirely off of copying and pasting a wikipedia page too, which is peak low effort content.

    • @sohail008007
      @sohail008007 14 днів тому +15

      They know it's fake and will probably expect people to see it's fake and skip the sponsor

    • @blammela
      @blammela 11 днів тому +3

      Yeah. I bought racons only bcz I believed in the integrity of Swoop. And I’m not some dumb kid and not buying a bunch of influencer crap. But I was duped. Turns out they are known to be crappy. I can’t watch swoop docs anymore cuz I just hear her BS voice shilling racons through the whole thing now. There is no way she had the experience w the product she claimed or researched them at all. Lesson learned.

  • @epbrown01
    @epbrown01 15 днів тому +163

    I’ve always felt a big part of the reason the big name advertisers don’t do UA-cam is that it has the same problem as MuskTwitter: the people your brand/product/ads aren’t vetted professionals and can turn out to be sketchy as hell. Coca-cola is not looking to be part of Logan Paul’s next scandal, but something like FTX or Yotta won’t mind so much.

    • @TigerLily61811
      @TigerLily61811 6 днів тому +8

      Coca Cola also isn't looking to advertise to 250k people... they want to advertise to 250M people.

    • @apertureatomics
      @apertureatomics 5 днів тому

      ​@@TigerLily61811yes, and they did so really badly this year LOL

  • @TheUncleRuckus
    @TheUncleRuckus 17 днів тому +180

    What really pisses me off is now those scamming POS at Better Help are posting commercials on TV and buying actual ads on UA-cam and not going the sponsorship route. I report their ad as a Scam every time it shows up on YT but the ppl bamboozled by them via TV Commercials aren't aware of this issues as its been largely confined in our online space.

    • @skullsaintdead
      @skullsaintdead 16 днів тому

      Good on ya, respect. BetterHelp is one of the most dangerous dodgy sponsors, as it targets already vulnerable people who may be severely depressed and anxious and just sells their info to advertisers, while providing poor (and sometimes unqualified) generalised mental health advice. Anyone who still takes their money after their dodgy-ness was exposed several years ago, I have no respect for. Basically, screw you for taking profit over someone else's suffering.

    • @Sashko_Dee
      @Sashko_Dee 15 днів тому +17

      Don't be a silly goose and waste your time with watching and/or reporting ads. Advertisements are like a cancer. What you want to do is cut them out entirely. Grab Firefox with the ublock origin and sponsorblock extension for your home PC and patch yourself UA-cam revanced on Android. No more ads, no more inline sponsor segments. All for free. And best of all you screw Google out of money and have a better experience than the jabronis that pay for YT Premium.

    • @TheRealJabbergeist
      @TheRealJabbergeist 15 днів тому +10

      Same here, I get viscerally angry whenever a video breaks to a better help ad.

    • @akiradkcn
      @akiradkcn 13 днів тому +3

      Get a ad blocker, reports do nothing

    • @SoloDoloPoloOlaf
      @SoloDoloPoloOlaf 11 днів тому +4

      Want to actually do something? Report it to the responsible government agency of your country. You can also tip off some journalists for your local/national news if you want to "force" the government agency to respond (at all).
      I'm joking, no one gives a shit. Google is too big to care.

  • @intergalacticalcommiteeofp9807
    @intergalacticalcommiteeofp9807 19 днів тому +342

    The most annoying thing is the repetitive script. They have to hit certain marketing phrases that makes them look like complete shills. And because it seems that when there is a major sponsor, they will buy out like 95% of all videos, that script is repeated again and again worse than what you'd get on TV. Like it was so bad with NordVPN and Raid Shadow Legends, phrases like "This video is sponsored by NordVPN" or "This video is sponsored by RAID SHADOW LEGENDS" became such memes, even though I hardly see either of them sponsoring anymore (NordVPN has a sister VPN Surfshark that still pops up every now and then, but not nearly as much). But I guess it's also a saving grace, if the creator has nothing to say that hasn't been repeated in exact same order with exact same marketing phrases, I know they don't use it and took the sponsorship for the money.

    • @jfwfreo
      @jfwfreo 19 днів тому +24

      I remember seeing a travel channel that ran a VPN ad on a video about traveling to a country where VPNs are illegal.

    • @Kanbei11
      @Kanbei11 19 днів тому +37

      ​@@jfwfreoand from what I've seen only one person (Tom Scott) has mentioned that getting around geo blocked content might not be allowed by streaming services

    • @djw7141
      @djw7141 18 днів тому +10

      @@Kanbei11u can’t expect everyone to be as good as Tom Scott.

    • @Kanbei11
      @Kanbei11 18 днів тому +6

      @@djw7141 that's true and on top of that he has the best subtitles on the platform.
      It's just something I never even thought of until I saw him mention it

    • @intergalacticalcommiteeofp9807
      @intergalacticalcommiteeofp9807 18 днів тому +32

      @@jfwfreo Okay, this might sound like a shill when I just complained about them, but I worked for a VPN customer support (everyone needs a student job to complain about) and truth be told, the restricted countries are probably the ones that actually get the most benefit out of it. Sure, the service is spotty, the firewall contantly updates and VPN crashes (especially China, we had a whole seperate workflow how to get VPN to work in China), but when we got it to work again, people actually could bypass government restrictions. If I were to move to one of those restricted countries, I probably would consider paying the totally not worth it in a free country price for a VPN. But it is my personal experience, I honestly saw no need for VPNs until half of the messages I got were Chinese people thankful to access the internet again and realised it actually is useful to them.

  • @gamagama69
    @gamagama69 19 днів тому +255

    i really cant feel bad abt sponsorblock tbh. youtube premium integrated some features from it even like skipping to a "most popular" start place

    • @DanKaschel
      @DanKaschel 14 днів тому +6

      You do you. But let's not pretend we'll get anything for free. UA-cam is enormously expensive to run.

    • @miketheperformer5972
      @miketheperformer5972 10 днів тому +10

      I'm a little sad that I had to scroll this far down in the comments to find someone else using it.

    • @TwiliPaladin
      @TwiliPaladin 9 днів тому +12

      ​@@DanKaschelHence why it's never had a single profitable year. Streaming services are inherently unprofitable without abandoning all sense of morality and sticking to legal grey areas.

    • @TheLastestYo-KaiWatchFan9001
      @TheLastestYo-KaiWatchFan9001 7 днів тому

      @@miketheperformer5972 Yeah, fellow user of it here and this took a few minutes to find. Somewhat surprising and indeed moderately gloomy.

  • @dahorn100011
    @dahorn100011 15 днів тому +62

    The best youtubers are those who put chapters in their videos, so you can go to the next phase.

    • @awkwardcultism
      @awkwardcultism 5 днів тому

      If you use SponsorBlock, every UA-camr is like that.

  • @amirmohamad2270
    @amirmohamad2270 16 днів тому +87

    A really terrible train of thought that I've seen from UA-camrs is that they basically say " we are gonna say we absolutely love this product, but our viewers should know we don't really mean it. Even if we literally say we mean it during the ad section".

    • @DanKaschel
      @DanKaschel 14 днів тому +9

      Aka the fox 'news' defense

    • @sunbleachedangel
      @sunbleachedangel 11 днів тому +4

      It's just a convenient cop out for them, they get all the benefits (money) and no drawbacks (responsibility). Just close your eyes and ears and scream "LA LA LA EVERYONE KNOWS SPONSORSHIPS ARE LIES ANYWAY LA LA LA" which is of course demonstrably false because if that was true, they wouldn't fucking exist to begin with

  • @straydotmp4
    @straydotmp4 18 днів тому +104

    kinda wish UA-cam sponsors worked in the way of
    >UA-camr mentions they use a product very often in their day-to-day lives (actual normal VPN, some brand of tea, some kind of electronics, etc)
    >company reaches out and offers a small-scale discount for viewers
    The latest nightmare scenario has been big UA-camrs pushing law firms like Morgan & Morgan ???? Like hello what??????

    • @cibularas3485
      @cibularas3485 17 днів тому

      Simple history pushed Mirgab

    • @NXTangl
      @NXTangl 17 днів тому

      Except lawtubers, they mostly shill their own firms-that makes *sense.*

    • @LeonCoretz
      @LeonCoretz 14 днів тому +21

      It took years to happen but this was how SpiffingBrit (Spiff) got a car. He always peddled Yorkshire tea.

    • @vocaeien
      @vocaeien 14 днів тому +8

      ​@@LeonCoretz I love that for him

    • @b3thamphetamine
      @b3thamphetamine 14 днів тому +4

      @@LeonCoretz Please tell me it was wrapped in their logo.

  • @theowinters6314
    @theowinters6314 18 днів тому +184

    I really want to see more PBS style sponsors, where it's up front, only about 10 seconds long and easy to skip.

    • @monbub
      @monbub 15 днів тому

      this is a great idea!

    • @boudewijnj.m.kegels5198
      @boudewijnj.m.kegels5198 12 днів тому

      @@monbub But not for YT itself. I use Adblock Plus and have them taken out automatically. Doesn't function on every site anymore since there are Adblock detection scripts running to annoy you. Also not every browser supports it the same way

    • @youtubeuniversity3638
      @youtubeuniversity3638 11 днів тому +33

      "Brought to you by viewers like you. Thank you."

    • @Hexagonian
      @Hexagonian 11 днів тому +11

      @@youtubeuniversity3638 iconic quote, big respect to PBS

    • @pokechimp1544
      @pokechimp1544 9 днів тому +8

      funding for schaff is provided by

  • @katecone2295
    @katecone2295 18 днів тому +137

    It really sucks that youtube can demonitize videos for the stupidest things which basically forces a lot of youtubers to take these sketchy sponsors. It sucks seeing some of my favorite youtubers promote this stuff.
    Glad I found your channel. A sub from me.

    • @lakerskid2013
      @lakerskid2013 18 днів тому +1

      If I ever did somehow become big on here, there is no way I would ever sign a sponsorship with anybody at all because I’m not desperate for money like that. I personally run into sports betting, mobile games, and Internet security sponsorships the most but sports betting is the worst one.

    • @mina86
      @mina86 18 днів тому +10

      Even if YT demonetised no one ever, people would still take all the same sponsorships.

    • @DanKaschel
      @DanKaschel 14 днів тому +3

      ​@@mina86even if that is true, it's still reasonable to be sad that there is no righteous & tenable path

    • @yungmalaria
      @yungmalaria 2 дні тому

      @@mina86More likely people would just game the ad rev system to its max. This is not even theoretical if you remember the times before YT kids and the old monetization policies.

  • @porehebdkdb1987
    @porehebdkdb1987 14 днів тому +47

    I am glad that I got so desentized to all these, as a kid who's (obviously had no money), seeing all these "sponsorships" was just noise, and as an adult, I am never going to click on these sponsorships, especially after this video. And also, my deffinition of what friends are, amongst other things woild never allow me to trust "influencers" with my money.

  • @AutoCannonSaysHi
    @AutoCannonSaysHi 16 днів тому +64

    Advertising is weird. Too much of a product being pushed, is a red flag. The more I see it, the more I'm pushed away from it.
    90% of the time, the red flag is accurate. The product isn't worth the price, so they're making a butt load of money for poor products, which is funneled into advertising to boost that money making BS.
    Bad product making too much money, consumer ignorance, both feeding into this cycle of awful.

  • @Thandi123
    @Thandi123 19 днів тому +431

    You know your business strategy is good when it references the guys who lost WWII.

    • @Asmodis4
      @Asmodis4 19 днів тому +47

      even funnier is that the brits invented the idea of "Blitzkrieg", they only thought it would be to expensive to implement it on the battle field.
      look here for more Info:
      "Cautionary Tales Ep 6 - How Britain Invented, Then Ignored, Blitzkrieg"

    • @thecrispymaster
      @thecrispymaster 19 днів тому +31

      To be fair, it did work for Germany initially, and the UK has geographic factors that make the strategy less viable than for countries with land borders with their neighbours.

    • @kenon6968
      @kenon6968 18 днів тому +11

      @@Asmodis4the Russians Brits and Germans came up with the idea more or less simultaneously, just one of those countries had snazzy uniforms and the chance to apply it first against a bunch of bush league armies, so everyone's super impressed with their military acumen.

    • @glidershower
      @glidershower 16 днів тому +3

      >who lost ww2
      *...humanity?*

    • @wrightmf
      @wrightmf 15 днів тому +1

      @@thecrispymaster The concept of jumping way ahead of supply lines, securing an area then hope that supply line will establish. Sounds like what airborne units do, sometimes it works (Operation Overlord), sometimes not (Operation Market Garden). We see that in businesses though most fail to establish a solid business model. Interesting that Uber and AirBNB secured their business though I think both are sketchy, but no way a government will be able to regulate them.

  • @gars129
    @gars129 16 днів тому +47

    Influencers are essentially an improved version of the parasocial relationships with morning news shows or AM Talk Radio hosts our parents still often have. You see how the hosts ocasionally announce the birth of their kid or an illness live and relatively improvised. They appear during christmas episodes, and spend a lot of time just cracking jokes and being friends.

  • @nadiaulrich
    @nadiaulrich 15 днів тому +57

    The better help sponsorship is the reason why I don't really watch Cinema Therapy anymore. Loved that channel but it felt so weird watching it after they were sponsored by better help multiple times.

    • @elise_g
      @elise_g 12 днів тому +5

      Same here

    • @Kat-tr2ig
      @Kat-tr2ig 11 днів тому +8

      Same here. Also, they reviewed the movie Labyrinth and were super anal about it, with very mean spirited comments about teen girls and calling her a brat, although the previous week they did another video about a teenage boy and praised him for the same things that they ridiculed Sarah for. Fortunately, the comment section did not disappoint and called them out on their bs. Plus, if the therapist guy ended up divorcing his wife, how good of a therapist could he actually be.

    • @thecrazyswede2495
      @thecrazyswede2495 10 днів тому

      @@Kat-tr2ig You're not going to love me for this, but the divorcing therapist might actually be a good one. If the therapists haven't gone through their own divorce, they have no real experience of how it is, and can only follow a script. Like an automobile driver who hasn't almost killed himself driving too tired doesn't have it in him to know in his nerves how dangerous it is. cheers! / CS

    • @vibaj16
      @vibaj16 10 днів тому +6

      same reason I no longer watch The Action Lab. Especially because he deletes all comments that mention Better Help.

    • @newcarpathia9422
      @newcarpathia9422 6 днів тому +2

      Same. Unsubbed and hit "do not recommend" on their channel. What a disgrace for an actual therapist to take their rotten money.

  • @42Porter
    @42Porter 12 днів тому +18

    Observing how so many UA-camrs that make well researched, thoughtful often helpful and healthful content will choose to harm their audiences and destroy their credibility by promoting these sponsors has been eye opening. It’s getting harder and harder to trust anyone on this site. At this point I’d be a fool if I did.

  • @Velereonics
    @Velereonics 15 днів тому +33

    Better help is just conceptually bad like corporatized mental health care that you can do through text ... with a psychologist who's probably paid way less than they would make if they could afford to rent a practice and they are just like churning through people like they literally have 60 minutes exactly and then you need to get the f*** off so that they can go talk to someone else
    Not to mention if you've ever been in Psych Care like severe Psych Care it doesn't work if the person can't see you like they have to see what your demeanor is like they have to see if you are taking care of yourself because it's pretty obvious when someone's not and if you start to deteriorate it's visually very obvious whereas in your voice and your text messages it will not be as obvious so you just have to be in front of someone

  • @WooShell
    @WooShell 19 днів тому +93

    I have made it a habit to rank down companies with excessive sponsorship and ads in my purchasing decisions. Like, if you annoy me more, I'm going to buy less from you. By the current tally, it'll take until roughly 2038 before I will even consider getting NordVPN or playing Raid Shadow Legends.

    • @qwertydog9795
      @qwertydog9795 10 днів тому +2

      vpns arent a scam though. everyone should have one

    • @WooShell
      @WooShell 10 днів тому

      @@qwertydog9795 They don't provide *any* benefit as long as you're not on an insecure network (e.g. at an airport or Starbucks). And they're fearmongering that "your ISP can collect your browsing habits", when the alternative is "your VPN provider can collect your browsing habits", and VPN providers are less strictly regulated than ISPs. Several leaks and police raids on VPN providers have already shown that "we don't log anything" is a lie in most cases. They log and sell whatever data they can, to supplement the income from those "90% off superdeal" sales.
      Also, that constant advertising for "you can use VPNs to watch Netflix in other countries" is what got Netflix to actually start cracking down on VPN usage (or rather, the movie studios forcing Netflix to do so).. had they shut up about that "feature", we could still enjoy using it.

    • @Berkham1995
      @Berkham1995 6 днів тому

      Which companies advertised the most and the least?

    • @Storm411z
      @Storm411z 4 дні тому

      @@qwertydog9795Surfshark? an alternative vpn?

    • @billyrunsaplumbingservice1141
      @billyrunsaplumbingservice1141 19 годин тому

      ​@@qwertydog9795Nord is indeed a Scam. I rather watch tech youtubers ranking down VPN provider and make my own list rather than blatantly trust Nord VPN from youtubers, in which I came to conclusion using Proton is not bad and you dont have to pay a single penny for using a VPN.

  • @Crossark1
    @Crossark1 19 днів тому +189

    One of my favorite ways of running ads is done by Some More News. They didn’t always go out of their way to subtly cast doubt on their advertisers’ claims, but they also didn’t hide their genuine disgusted reaction to, say, the taste of AG-1. Now, they make it very clear when they’re being told to convey a sentiment that they don’t necessarily agree with using lines like, “Our sponsors tell us to say that [insert dubious claim here].” It really makes the viewer aware of how sketchy the sponsors are.

    • @gregorammann7147
      @gregorammann7147 19 днів тому +31

      Still, you need to realize that it's an advertisement, not an honest product review. AG1 was shown the video before and they figured they will make money from it so they gave it their ok.
      I agree that this way of doing sponsors is more transparent. I think many people do not realize how much influence the advertiser has on the content of the "sponsored" segment.

    • @shingshongshamalama
      @shingshongshamalama 19 днів тому +19

      @@gregorammann7147
      Whenever someone says "this is not a scripted segment" or says something that SOUNDS personalized?
      That's a script.
      That's definitely a script.

    • @Avendesora
      @Avendesora 19 днів тому +7

      This is even more obvious now that they have Ground News and they get to say they sought them out

    • @wednesdaybell3062
      @wednesdaybell3062 18 днів тому +10

      I'm amazed that AG1 is STILL willing to give them money. I guess people must still be buying that shit despite the ad effectively being anti-marketing.

    • @Lacewise
      @Lacewise 18 днів тому +10

      @@shingshongshamalama the one I don’t understand is “sponsors don’t dictate the rest of the video” when I know of several cases of an influencer mentioning they got in trouble in a brand deal for doing a different video than the one discussed or changing the approved script even when it’s not the ad read. People have been honest about it before and anyone who’s ever taken a marketing class, read up about paid promotion, or has an interest in the history of tv (so everyone who watched 30 Rock) knows it’s an obvious lie. That’s a lot of people!

  • @gdutfulkbhh7537
    @gdutfulkbhh7537 15 днів тому +78

    I think we all knew that Raycons would have awful sound quality, simply because they felt the need to advertise them so very hard.

    • @Jokoko2828
      @Jokoko2828 15 днів тому +7

      I've made it a habit to write off any product that needs youtubers to advertise it.

    • @Obsidian8R
      @Obsidian8R 15 днів тому +7

      "yeah, ill just stick with my wired headphones thank you very much"

    • @concinnus
      @concinnus 15 днів тому +2

      @@Jokoko2828 Or Dr. Dre, for that matter.

    • @dglcomputers1498
      @dglcomputers1498 13 днів тому +5

      When's the last time Sennheiser or Beyerdynamic needed to advertise on YT?, people know your going to get something acceptable for the price paid from them and people know who they are already. No need to to try and tell people your crap product is good if it's a genuinely good product from a well known decent manufacturer.

    • @TheeChiv
      @TheeChiv 12 днів тому +3

      @@dglcomputers1498Sennhieser not only has advertised there products, using celebrity to legitimise their brand, but have also sponsored events to get their name out there. What on earth are you on about.

  • @think_like_a_fish
    @think_like_a_fish 15 днів тому +38

    This is slightly unrelated, but one of the worst offenders on YT to me is the NFL. When you watch a recap of the recent games you get 3 or 4 ad breaks in a 12-15 minute video. The first one plays at almost exactly the 1:00 mark. The video is barely started and all of a sudden you get interrupted. Then 4 minutes later you're interrupted again. And 4 minutes later, again! It's not like the NFL is lacking in money, either! I know of no other channel that crams that many ad breaks into their videos. A college football game recap might have one ad break in a video of similar length, yet the NFL puts in 3 or 4 ads.

    • @flux.aeterna
      @flux.aeterna 12 днів тому +6

      They’re trying to replicate the revenues they once got from cable viewers

    • @nameless7225
      @nameless7225 3 дні тому

      That’s why they worth 6 billion

  • @bs_blackscout
    @bs_blackscout 8 днів тому +11

    As someone who had a bad regular therapist from a regular clinic I can't imagine what types of "therapists" exist in BetterHelp. Screw them.
    You don't know the type of damage a bad therapist can do.

  • @spartan8705
    @spartan8705 19 днів тому +106

    The only sponsors that I can think of having seen non-YT ads for are tech brands who sponsor tech channels like LTT, GamersNexus, or Hardware Unboxed
    AMD, Intel, MSI, Asus
    Big, established names who pay to push their new products in a market where buying used items is fairly commonplace and a huge money saver

    • @normalchannel2185
      @normalchannel2185 19 днів тому +1

      Yep.

    • @monicahoger
      @monicahoger 18 днів тому +16

      Doesn't LTT have somewhere on their forum where they explicitly show the types of sponsorships they WON'T work with either?

    • @XGD5layer
      @XGD5layer 18 днів тому +12

      ​@@monicahogeryes, the "LMG sponsor do not work with list"

    • @kaydog890
      @kaydog890 18 днів тому +4

      LTT / LMG is the ad.

    • @lunarvvolf9606
      @lunarvvolf9606 17 днів тому +3

      Yeah well here is to building pcs using only new parts never once been burned by some shady crypto bozo liquidating their stock of heavily used shitware and zero doubts as to the validity of the warranties either. Peace of mind is a wonderful thing.

  • @h2o2630
    @h2o2630 19 днів тому +29

    As weird as it is I miss when ads actually advertised? If that makes any sense, it all feels so shallow now.

    • @ARStudios2000
      @ARStudios2000 8 днів тому

      What would you mean by that?

    • @Hero0451
      @Hero0451 2 дні тому

      I feel you, was watching TV with my grandma and every time an Ad came on I’d say,
      “What the fuck did that have to do with the product? You shown me a dog and a baby playing in the grass but the shit I’m supposed to get out of it, is toothpaste. At least the Coke Polar Bears had a goddamn bottle of Coke.”

  • @Nortonius_
    @Nortonius_ 13 днів тому +17

    very nostalgic seeing the footage of early, pre monetized, pre slick YT. nice video!

    • @Micro-Econ-YT
      @Micro-Econ-YT  13 днів тому +10

      Annoying orange may not be Oscar worthy cinema but it certainly gave me a good chuckle as a kid

    • @thecrazyswede2495
      @thecrazyswede2495 10 днів тому

      @@Micro-Econ-YT Marshmallow Murders. cheers! / CS

  • @IxilPierce
    @IxilPierce 14 днів тому +15

    Better help was exposed years ago- right here on UA-cam.

  • @ToastedHeadcrab
    @ToastedHeadcrab 19 днів тому +235

    Thank god sponsorblock exists

    • @Lycaon1765
      @Lycaon1765 16 днів тому +10

      Thank Loki for UA-cam revanced!

    • @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714
      @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 16 днів тому +8

      I just always skip manually.

    • @TheRealMeowMeow01
      @TheRealMeowMeow01 16 днів тому +2

      ​@@Lycaon1765and all forks with different set of features

    • @SimuLord
      @SimuLord 16 днів тому +7

      I finally added that to Firefox last week. How I didn't think to do it before, well, I can kick my old self for that.

    • @vibaj16
      @vibaj16 10 днів тому

      it's not that hard to just press L a few times

  • @cascadianrangers728
    @cascadianrangers728 19 днів тому +37

    I haven't just fallen off the turnip wagon and I can normally smell a scam from a mile away and I've always known that influencers are pedaling absolute crap, but you explained all the reasoning and facts behind my instinctual gut reaction really really well and I appreciate it

  • @liquidl5380
    @liquidl5380 17 днів тому +24

    2:09 - 2:44 There is a niche in the tech hobbies (gaming, astrophotography, astronomy) where you see more traditional "here's a brand that is sponsoring our videos/providing review copies of gear" etc. Not sure if that extends to hobbies outside these tech niches tho. Most consumers aren't putting a ton of thought into what monitor is best or what graphics card to purchase to play games etc. And astronomy is a very narrow audience to begin with. But because of that you're not gonna see them outside of these niches.

    • @thenorseman8964
      @thenorseman8964 17 днів тому +10

      i was just about to post something similar, except I haunt contractors, builders, HVAC / electrician / plumbing channels and woodworking ones as well, and they often do the same thing. A big name brand like Milwaukee or DeWalt or even more industry standard (obscure to us, but known in the construction business like for home insulation or siding) brands will donate products to the channels and then they'll usually just drop a very brief comment like, "...and we'd like to thank our sponsors over at Philips Electric for their generosity in donating all of the lighting fixtures we're installing today..." and along those lines.
      So, not as in-your-face as a one or two minute long interruption with the channel grandly extolling the virtues of this unknown product, but it's still there.
      Oh, and more often than not, there is an affiliate link provided "Just in case" you want to buy the latest 12 volt thingamagic from the well-known company, almost always from Amazon.

    • @katrinabryce
      @katrinabryce 14 днів тому +3

      I think those sort of brands would previously have advertised in trade magazines, but those don't really exist any more.

    • @corjade9217
      @corjade9217 7 днів тому +1

      Also there's a lot of gaming companies (like legitimate game companies) sponsoring semi big names like sega is quite fond of it I've seen a lot of creators being sponsored for the new sonic game or atlus new rpg it's honestly really cool considering they're genuinely good games.

  • @DaveTexas
    @DaveTexas 14 днів тому +45

    I’ve only ever tried one product that was sponsoring UA-cam videos - Magic Spoon. I bought some boxes of their cereal. It was disgusting. The cereal tasted NOTHING like the brand-name cereals they were attempting to imitate. I discovered that every UA-camr who told me that Magic Spoon tastes exactly like the full-sugar cereals was LYING!
    That put an end to any desire I ever had to try any product I saw a UA-camr peddling.

    • @cockatoo010
      @cockatoo010 12 днів тому

      Magic Spoon is apparently very hit or miss. Either delicious or you'd be more satisfied with eating the box.
      Can't trust a company that inconsistent

    • @chriswest6988
      @chriswest6988 12 днів тому +14

      I've seen similar stuff in actual stores and it just sounded impossible. Keto-friendly cereal is like saying low-fat cooking oil. You can make cereal without a bunch of sugar, but if it doesn't have carbs, it's not made out of cereal.

    • @BlueSpams
      @BlueSpams 11 днів тому +9

      A coworker bought some recently out of curiosity, she hadn’t even heard of it before it was on shelves. Said it was like she was eating mulch and let me try some. And I can back up it indeed tastes like wood shavings or mulch

    • @matthewbarabas3052
      @matthewbarabas3052 4 дні тому

      you were fooled by the ads in the first place? wow.....

    • @alex_bee_kind
      @alex_bee_kind 7 годин тому

      While I agree, it taste absolutely nothing like the brand-name cereals. It’s trying to emulate, either You just got a bad batch or I must be crazy. Because I actually really like magic spoon. It’s a little pricey, but it’s still taste good and it’s healthier than the cereal. I normally get.

  • @lukaszspychaj9210
    @lukaszspychaj9210 15 днів тому +22

    No way you put Hello Fresh and NordVPN on the list of 'approved' sponsors

    • @Mafuraai
      @Mafuraai 9 днів тому +15

      This is what I was thinking 😬 I mean I don't know the stuff about NordVPN, but Hello fresh is well known for their sketchy and unethical practices, definitely fits the youtube sponsor architype.
      Maybe it would've been a good idea to check the background of those companies before claiming that they're somehow better

    • @matthewbarabas3052
      @matthewbarabas3052 4 дні тому +1

      blacklist him, too. hes a sellout.

    • @Mafuraai
      @Mafuraai 2 дні тому

      @@matthewbarabas3052 Don't be silly.

    • @matthewbarabas3052
      @matthewbarabas3052 2 дні тому +1

      @@Mafuraai whats silly is allowing any sponsors at all. allowing any ads at all.

    • @Mafuraai
      @Mafuraai День тому

      ​@@matthewbarabas3052 Mmmkay, go ahead and blacklist then 😄 I don't agree

  • @davidstruck8109
    @davidstruck8109 10 днів тому +19

    1:25 guhhh thanks for reminding me about that guy

    • @polskabalaclava
      @polskabalaclava 9 днів тому

      Who is he? I’m unfamiliar with him

    • @davidstruck8109
      @davidstruck8109 7 днів тому

      @polskabalaclava I don't even remember his name but for a while you saw that video where he's talking about his cars and it turned out to be a crypto scam

    • @BadDriverrr
      @BadDriverrr 5 днів тому

      @@davidstruck8109zero surprise here

    • @gordahnculous
      @gordahnculous 3 дні тому

      His name is Tai Lopez, and especially in the mid 2010s, his advertising was nearly everywhere on UA-cam and was constantly memed on

    • @polskabalaclava
      @polskabalaclava 3 дні тому

      @@davidstruck8109 ah ok

  • @tranmthu
    @tranmthu 12 днів тому +18

    And this is why I have Sponsorblock. Sponsored segments get skipped automatically so I've not seen sponsored content in videos in quite a while.

    • @katenpp
      @katenpp 12 днів тому +4

      You may have just changed my life

    • @matthewbarabas3052
      @matthewbarabas3052 4 дні тому +1

      does it actually work as advertised?

    • @tranmthu
      @tranmthu 4 дні тому

      @@matthewbarabas3052 it does! you can set it to automatically skipping sponsored content or just show a button for you to click (some people do make funny ad segments). it can also skip intro and outro segments, non music parts in music videos, and some other things. I use it in a combination with ublock origin (on PC) or with revanced (on mobile) so I've not seen a whole ad on youtube in years.

    • @erisophelia
      @erisophelia 2 дні тому

      @@matthewbarabas3052 generally yes. sponsor segments are contributed by users, so newer and less popular videos might not have their sponsors skipped, but in that case it's really easy to fix that yourself.

  • @Holey2662
    @Holey2662 19 днів тому +136

    sponsor block extension on top lol

    • @kenon6968
      @kenon6968 19 днів тому +30

      Anyone who uses UA-cam without an ad or sponsor block is a fool

    • @sponge4270
      @sponge4270 19 днів тому

      @@kenon6968and*

    • @arsonisticdelphox807
      @arsonisticdelphox807 19 днів тому

      ​@@kenon6968i use premium because I can't find a non shady ad blocker

    • @frankmckenneth9254
      @frankmckenneth9254 19 днів тому +9

      @@kenon6968 yeap. You're wasting your time honestly, you won't buy these products. So why are you making yourself watch the ads?

    • @JamesTK
      @JamesTK 17 днів тому

      @@kenon6968 YT Premium + Sponsorblock here... Sucks there isn't an easy equivalent for ios

  • @RememberingGames
    @RememberingGames 16 днів тому +20

    I now have PTSD from the phrase "but before we start..."

    • @polychronistheo
      @polychronistheo 7 днів тому +2

      Ok, this the best comment so far! Can't roll my eyes enough every time they start their generic speech about their amazing sponsor. Thanks for making me laugh! PTSD indeed.

  • @qarnos
    @qarnos 15 днів тому +7

    It used to drive me up the wall whenever an episode of Sesame St was sponsored by the number 7.

  • @manyyoumas
    @manyyoumas 18 днів тому +72

    i feel bad for creators because youtube’s backwards rules have continually made it hard for them to earn money off videos they created, but at the same time… in the past couple weeks alone i’ve had to unsubscribe from a couple channels i liked because their ads were taking up so much of the video that it was actually taking up a decent fraction of the video length. if i see a 45 min video uploaded but literally 7-8 minutes of that is sponsorships or promoting your stuff, then i feel extremely cheated as a viewer. my time was wasted and i feel disappointed that the video length is not nearly as much as i thought it was.
    i want creators to make money but i’m also not going to sit there and be sold a product for an informerical length of time. it almost always cuts into the video topic at the worst time and ruins any flow or cohesion the narrator has. i’ve started to just skip through the beginning parts of peoples videos by default, which is a shame because they could have put decent work into it. but if i see more than one sponsor i’m skipping the vid

    • @jayl5032
      @jayl5032 15 днів тому +10

      Adblock dude. You dont have to unsub. Get a browser or extension. Just look into it a little, dont just give up.

  • @theventuracountyrailfan
    @theventuracountyrailfan 15 днів тому +8

    My biggest problem with sponsorship is the length. UA-camrs make like 4 minutes of content, 3 minutes of sponsorship and 1 min of intro/outro in an 8 minute video. Also relevancy: some bad mobile game in a video about a deep topic. The worst is when I see small/medium channels like coaster studios taking betterhelp.

  • @jays.6843
    @jays.6843 13 днів тому +13

    The only sponsored product I've ever gotten was a Ridge Wallet, and honestly, it's a pretty damn good wallet. It's just overpriced.

    • @Mizai
      @Mizai 11 днів тому +2

      they extrude that piece of aluminum for $2 its way way overpriced

  • @ByiLHS
    @ByiLHS 13 днів тому +7

    Idk what I did, but at least my ads have been the local Honda dealership for a while lol

  • @Peasham
    @Peasham 14 днів тому +10

    My favorite sponsor's gotta be betterhelp cuz you instantly know "oh this youtuber's a scumbag"

    • @mangomage33
      @mangomage33 14 днів тому +3

      A couple people I follow did a couple sponsor reads from them years ago, and then never again. I wonder why.

  • @AndreasMSchroeder
    @AndreasMSchroeder 18 днів тому +12

    So the editing from 1:38 to 1:45 going „FTX“->“Depression“(->“FTX“) was pretty subtle, but then at 2:35 including a Prime bottle in the „one off novelty purchases“ category, that’s absolutely savage.

  • @onthewater4020
    @onthewater4020 19 днів тому +49

    There is one category you haven't touched on - actual product sponsorships. What I see most often, in the "weird builder of things" type UA-cam channels, are things like power banks, solar equipment, that kind of thing.

    • @sirBrouwer
      @sirBrouwer 19 днів тому +7

      in those cases I always wonder if you see the sponsored product outside of the advertisement part.
      Like if they are really liking a product you might just see them use it of the blue when they are not aiming the camera at it dead on.
      I mean there are cases that people really are endorsing it.
      A guy I follow is more or less a walking add for a company however they don't pay them he is the one paying.

    • @SimuLord
      @SimuLord 16 днів тому +14

      The more niche the UA-cam segment, the more it makes sense for really niche real-world brands to go where the customers are, so it's kind of a win-win in that case.
      General interest UA-cam channels or those that are adjacent to a media segment that's well-represented on traditional media-cooking channels come to mind, so do sports sites-tend to attract the usual garbage advertisers.

    • @SetsunaTheFandom
      @SetsunaTheFandom 14 днів тому +1

      I do spot this one on sim racing-related channels I think. Usually they'd advertise a sim rig / peripheral. Also Aidan Millward did one watch sponsorship

    • @punchdrunkassassin
      @punchdrunkassassin 13 днів тому

      There's one channel I watch that does a lot of projects with resin, so a resin company reached out to provide them with product. They use the resin normally and pretty much let it speak for itself, rather than making every video an awkward ad read. Just make sure the logo faces the camera and everyone wins (they also openly disclose the partnership, which is rare and wonderful to see). It's basically a symbiotic relationship.
      I'd VASTLY prefer if most sponsorships went this way. It's way more organic, and an overall better fit with the audience and content.
      On the other hand, a different creator I watch really likes energy drinks, one specific kind in particular, and always has one at the ready in every video. But it's in a glass, and they don't mention the brand name. Apparently they asked, but the company wouldn't sponsor them. That would have been such a perfect and seamless opportunity though, especially as the creator is clearly going to drink it anyways and people are always asking about it in the comments. More companies need to clue in!

  • @kirbwarriork3371
    @kirbwarriork3371 18 днів тому +9

    9:50 I don't think there is a "kind of" here. They are taking a problem and making it bigger, they are actively supporting someone selling a scam. If they don't know it's a scam (or other problem), that's negligence (it's rarely hard to find the problems) and if they know it's a scam then they are in turn scammers. They know how their audience reacts to their words and they are using this to push product into the audience's hands.

  • @skiedev
    @skiedev 12 днів тому +7

    It feels like a fever dream that better help is back..

    • @comradescar6547
      @comradescar6547 2 дні тому

      fr like you’d think they’d at least change their name lol I know a sketchy ass rehab and psych ward that do that all the time.

  • @matt_9112
    @matt_9112 14 днів тому +3

    Woodworking channels having promo links to well established brands is like the only counter-example I can think of. And that's very niche at best.

  • @janedoe-ld5gt
    @janedoe-ld5gt 10 днів тому +7

    This doesn’t touch on beauty influencers being sponsored by brands, and the ridiculous amount of pr they get. I’ve seen beauty influencers sponsored by actual stores like Sephora before. Not to mention the recent trend of people being sponsored by actual gambling/slot machine apps.

  • @christophsiebert1213
    @christophsiebert1213 18 днів тому +37

    2:42 I immediately thought of Manscaped and Helix. I wouldn't put them in any of those 3 categories. Maybe novelty, depending how often you buy a new matress or razor, but I would say they are more high-quality luxury products, than novelty products.

    • @jonas_the_lost
      @jonas_the_lost 18 днів тому +5

      All I will say is "RAID Shadow Legends"

    • @soja_milk0790
      @soja_milk0790 18 днів тому +6

      They kind of are a subscription model

    • @christophsiebert1213
      @christophsiebert1213 17 днів тому

      @@soja_milk0790 Not mainly. I'm sure both have subscription models available. But I'd think Helix has some special offerings beside the one-time mattress purchase then. And for Manscaped you probably have a subscription to regularly get refills of your shaving cream and other consumables. But their main product is not a subscription.

    • @christophsiebert1213
      @christophsiebert1213 17 днів тому +1

      ​@@jonas_the_lost I'd say gacha games are kinda subscriptions. As most of them are either P2W or very heavily want you to regularly pay money. Unlike Helix or Manscaped, Gacha games use every trick in the book for that

    • @eightcoins4401
      @eightcoins4401 17 днів тому +23

      "High quality, luxury"? Its literally generic cheap razors they slapped their company trademark on
      Its classic black labelling.

  • @57thorns
    @57thorns 18 днів тому +35

    Blitzscaling is an interesting new word for a Ponzi scheme.
    Also, the insight that blitzkrieg is about outrunning your supply lines is interesting, because not all fast advancement are blitzkrieg, if your supply lines can keep up.

    • @TimoRutanen
      @TimoRutanen 14 днів тому +12

      It's not exact a ponzi though. A ponzi funds the whole thing with fees from new people while siphoning as much money off the top as possible before it collapses, and blitzscaling is trying to grab a market before the competitors or legislators can react to shut it down.
      An ethically questionable strategy nonetheless, I'd say.

    • @tottorookokkoroo5318
      @tottorookokkoroo5318 14 днів тому

      these shitty products have nothing to do with a ponzi scheme.

    • @MushookieMan
      @MushookieMan 13 днів тому

      But they didn't outrun their supply lines. That would be a terrible strategy

    • @KatherineFtw
      @KatherineFtw 12 днів тому +1

      @@MushookieManThey did in both the Battle of France where Rommel famously had to turn around and got a french division to surrender because they didn’t know he was out of supply on the way back, and most importantly in Operation Barberosa where the german army outran it’s supply line so bad that most of the army lacked winter coats and the units at the front of the spearhead ran out of ammunition and fuel.

  • @dityacivilizacii
    @dityacivilizacii 16 днів тому +6

    Ground News and Nebula are probably the only sponsors I can see myself using

  • @Jono4174
    @Jono4174 15 днів тому +9

    10:30 so I guess we won’t be getting a “subscription is always a scam” video after all.

  • @s.v.berezin1562
    @s.v.berezin1562 8 днів тому +4

    My father has a maxim: "If the product was that good, they wouldn't be going out of their way to advertise it."
    It's a good principle to apply, even if everyone advertises anyway.

  • @zizzleberries
    @zizzleberries 14 днів тому +13

    9:38 the code in this stock footage is from minecraft lol

  • @LadySnowfaerie
    @LadySnowfaerie 15 днів тому +16

    The only UA-cam sponsor I ever subscribed to and found usrful was Babbel, because I found the daily reminder of "you haven't studied German yet today, here's some stuff to do" helpful. I used to use Duolingo before that, but the leaderboards made it too stressful. I can't say I'm fluent, but it helped me brush up on my high school German.

    • @chriswest6988
      @chriswest6988 12 днів тому +3

      One of my favorite ever content creator ads is the McElroy brothers going so far off script that they imply Babbel supported Klingon (they did not) and stood in open defiance of judeo Christian god (more factually ambiguous, but they denied it).

    • @dee3246
      @dee3246 10 днів тому +2

      Freut mich das zuhören! Viel Spass beim Deutsch lernen

    • @zacharygustafson8714
      @zacharygustafson8714 8 днів тому

      @@dee3246 Ja, meinen lerner deytch mucho gusto.

  • @TheGameHoard
    @TheGameHoard 9 днів тому +3

    I've become so trained to skip ahead in videos when hearing familiar sponsor names that I had to hold myself back when he started listing them

  • @skatee99
    @skatee99 15 днів тому +3

    Thank you SO much for exposing this disgusting scam. This is why people are directly subscribing to content creators' channels or going to other options like Discord. UA-cam like so many other bloated business models, will begin to crumble under scrutiny, no matter how big they think they are.
    There ARE other options.

    • @777idkineedausername
      @777idkineedausername 15 днів тому +2

      What exactly makes it a "scam". Some of the sponsors are sure, but the inherent concept of advertising is not.

    • @skatee99
      @skatee99 12 днів тому +1

      That's what I meant, bogus sponsors, not the concept of sponsorship itself. There are, for example, many good videos on how bogus "Better Health" is, a scan. Yet, there are still videos posted with them as a sponsor and, saying how great they are.

  • @shamuclone
    @shamuclone 19 днів тому +72

    every time i see a sponsor i might like, i just buy from the competitor that doesnt spend money on ads and instead focus on making the product good

    • @kenon6968
      @kenon6968 19 днів тому +6

      Advertising is the lifeblood of business bro otherwise how do you find out that a company exists?

    • @dieucondorimperial2509
      @dieucondorimperial2509 19 днів тому

      @@kenon6968Word of mouth. Your local bakery, Wikipedia, Linux … everything doesn’t rely on ads, especially quality products.
      Plus marketing campaigns aren’t here so people know you exist, it’s mainly to buy your trust and attention. With a bit of digging, you can always find people doing product comparisons with little known, better quality products and services.

    • @erxxxx
      @erxxxx 18 днів тому

      @kenon6968 that is what all those parasites in marketing industry want you to think, not the actual truth

    • @MissInformer
      @MissInformer 18 днів тому

      ​@@kenon6968to genuinely answer your question, you look online and in stores in your local area. Many sponsorships sell you a product for a problem they created in their marketing, or attempt to offer a product that should be more heavily regulated if advertised a different way. Examples of that are products like keeps, which tries to prey on people's insecurity about losing their hair and then offer you the solution: their product. But how do they market a hair loss prevention product when those have already been available from the professionals you should be taking these medications with the consultation of? By removing the prescription requirement and selling an over the counter product while claiming it is made by or under the direction of medical professionals. And that's just one more obvious example. Other products play into people's addictions and the desire to quit them, like Füm. They use the same shady marketing other products of the past have by vaguely claiming it can help stave off bad habits and additions. They are products the general person doesn't need. If you see a sponsorship for a product people use regularly, like kitchen supplies, then it wouldn't be difficult to find those items (even if by a different maker) at a store near you or online where you can see reviews from multiple sources. That's the age we live in unfortunately. It's the evolution of the as seen on TV products of the 90s and early 2000s.

    • @Swarm_
      @Swarm_ 18 днів тому

      @@kenon6968 Doctors aren't allowed to advertise were i live, but i can still find one.

  • @mittsverigeurbanisten
    @mittsverigeurbanisten 12 днів тому +5

    I knew it was something fishy about this! I have always HATED sponsor segments! The ones I hate the most are those who starts to sound like a worrying negative turn on the actual contents and gradually fades into a commercial. I don't only get the video interrupted, I also feel myself so fooled. It should be instant delete on all accounts who do that!

  • @julianmartinez3048
    @julianmartinez3048 17 днів тому +6

    If I had a company, I would never advertise in youtube. Everybody would think it's a scam.
    Unless my company was a scam, of course.

  • @mitchjohnson4714
    @mitchjohnson4714 14 днів тому +4

    Great pitch, too. I have now subscribed, banishing you to the nether realm of channels that will absolutely never show up on my recommendations.

  • @aimeucuzinho
    @aimeucuzinho 12 днів тому +3

    You're right at the end there, Mr. Micro. I am very likely to click on videos that claim they are exposing YT sponsor scams. Good video; cheers!

  • @jeremiahstarke4516
    @jeremiahstarke4516 20 днів тому +26

    The production quality is high for such a low sub count.

    • @Micro-Econ-YT
      @Micro-Econ-YT  19 днів тому +6

      Appreciate that!

    • @Htbaa
      @Htbaa 16 днів тому

      The voice over audio seems to be clipping though :-(.

  • @renevuurwalt368
    @renevuurwalt368 19 днів тому +32

    Untill the final note i thought this had at least 150k views and you were a larger channel. Keep up the work

    • @Micro-Econ-YT
      @Micro-Econ-YT  19 днів тому +8

      Well maybe one day, but for now it’s crazy to me that I have got 1,000 views so quickly so thanks for checking out the channel 😊

    • @joshgould2707
      @joshgould2707 19 днів тому +6

      ​@@Micro-Econ-YTI might be wrong but I think you might have somewhat caught the algorithm with this one, I usually watch similar content to this & it was pushed into my feed - best of luck.

  • @OctopusEight
    @OctopusEight 20 днів тому +73

    I still think this is a 100k subscriber channel im watching lmao

    • @GundersenMarius
      @GundersenMarius 19 днів тому +1

      This channel has 581 subscribers???

    • @OctopusEight
      @OctopusEight 19 днів тому +3

      @@GundersenMarius its a reference to the production quality

  • @ronintje7647
    @ronintje7647 14 днів тому +8

    The most funny things are "financial youtubers" who act as if they have a clue about finance promoting scams as their sponsors.
    It shows how terrible they are at their job as they can't even find out their sponsors are scams.
    People, don't trust any sponsors on youtube and certainly don't trust youtubers who are sponsored by gambling and finance sponsors.

    • @ottz2506
      @ottz2506 14 днів тому

      Just don't trust any of them, especially the forex/zero commission trading and 'here's how Jenny made 34K in a month using this simple method you don't want to miss' ones.

  • @DiabeetusPrime
    @DiabeetusPrime 14 днів тому +2

    My personal law of advertising is “any product or service that is advertised on any social media platform is a scam”.

  • @andershoff6378
    @andershoff6378 6 днів тому +3

    It's like the line from My Chemical Romance's Disenchanted.
    "So I could watch all my heroes sell a car on tv."

  • @Devit42
    @Devit42 19 днів тому +11

    10:35 They got us in first 98.6%

  • @Dawson621
    @Dawson621 19 днів тому +34

    wow this is a really good video, your not even monetized yet that's a carzy amount of dedication. 327th subscriber

    • @Micro-Econ-YT
      @Micro-Econ-YT  19 днів тому +17

      Hopefully soon I’ll be able to sell out 🤞

  • @lukeyznaga7627
    @lukeyznaga7627 13 днів тому +1

    one of he biggest scams are the small video companies that say you can't watch a movie EXCEPT on their service. When I sometimes search for movie, I cannot buy some on youtube or rent. But ads in the ALGORITHM SEARCH or suggestions, puts up 2 or 3 "sponsored" sites that are individual channels that ask you to sign up and register to see certain movies. Then when you get there, they DON'T have that exact movie you want. Nothing has been done. WHEN IT COMES TO corrupt SPONSORS, there is no regulations or oversite or control by the authorities over what UA-cam can do. Which is why some people have unfairly had their channels locked down and closed or cancelled or things they supposedly have done. Or they get a "mark".

  • @MattClare1
    @MattClare1 16 днів тому +3

    Most folks don't consider money a "secret ingredient", in fact, money's a very well known ingredient