he's just trying to illustrate some initial limitations to chatgpt on a specific prompt. doesn't really get into chatgpt + mindb + llangchain. it's what many alt-groups use to get around some initial limitations + tracking on input tokens. giving chatgpt more access to the internet(+APIs) as well as "memory" (DB types specific to various kinds of media) it can 10x what most normies perceive as possible w it.
i hardly had the patience to follow this but i get what you're going for. That said, Kurzgesagt is absolute shit and anything near it stinks by proximity. I hate absolutely everything "0ur w0rld in d4ta'" themed. Those other two aren't much better.
@@Ztarpinka His sources for one. Academic sources are highly political at the top. You're looking at deceptive/biased think tanks and government groups by another name. Whenever someone is presented with an idea if it seems radical they are more likely to be biased towards believing any future idea that seems a little bit more conservative. not a phenomenon worth naming. being any kind of perceived authority in a group (especially intellectual) is a threatening thing and something any smart/reasonable/modest academic works to suppress by better arming their students or audience to speak out and against/criticize. It's one of of the best / most used instrument by educators because it's often the most effective. anybody that projects too much is big suss to me. He's part of production media mill and undoubtedly enjoys the false authority status. without looking at the money and pointing to some non youtube friendly stuff it's really hard to speak up and say more but i could try if there is some specific position you're trying to reach.
@@Ztarpinka Illegal libraries. buy a big ass drive. like real big. it's hard to rebuild some of the larger torrents on papers and stuff like that without having a NAS or SAN w/ 30+TB of storage. There is 10x more pay in studying a tiny fraction of researchers than there is in paying however many of them. Meta-analysis of some kind through educational surveillance tech is an absolute bitch. If you're interested in something adjacent that i feel like holds some relevance althought not immediately clear check out a paper called: One index, two publishers and the global research economy
@@Ztarpinka from there, any script kiddy from non-american country can help you setup basic software that takes the way off of most always-on ai using data you've trained on yourself. Like $300-500 USD if you really know how to schmooze.
as for opsec stuff , there are hosted mirrors/portals for just about everything mainstream that logs and shares way too much. invidious, peertube, mastodon, etc# are better but def still flawed. k a G I for search is a good service for finding things on platforms we're still stuck using.
you can easily tell your reading the script while also trying to look at the cameras. lol why didn't you put the script above the camera
So stupid. Whats this got to do with anything? After a few words i just hear blah blah blah
he's just trying to illustrate some initial limitations to chatgpt on a specific prompt. doesn't really get into chatgpt + mindb + llangchain. it's what many alt-groups use to get around some initial limitations + tracking on input tokens. giving chatgpt more access to the internet(+APIs) as well as "memory" (DB types specific to various kinds of media) it can 10x what most normies perceive as possible w it.
i hardly had the patience to follow this but i get what you're going for. That said, Kurzgesagt is absolute shit and anything near it stinks by proximity. I hate absolutely everything "0ur w0rld in d4ta'" themed. Those other two aren't much better.
Bro is a professional hater
@@Ztarpinka His sources for one. Academic sources are highly political at the top. You're looking at deceptive/biased think tanks and government groups by another name.
Whenever someone is presented with an idea if it seems radical they are more likely to be biased towards believing any future idea that seems a little bit more conservative. not a phenomenon worth naming.
being any kind of perceived authority in a group (especially intellectual) is a threatening thing and something any smart/reasonable/modest academic works to suppress by better arming their students or audience to speak out and against/criticize. It's one of of the best / most used instrument by educators because it's often the most effective. anybody that projects too much is big suss to me.
He's part of production media mill and undoubtedly enjoys the false authority status. without looking at the money and pointing to some non youtube friendly stuff it's really hard to speak up and say more but i could try if there is some specific position you're trying to reach.
@@Ztarpinka Illegal libraries. buy a big ass drive. like real big. it's hard to rebuild some of the larger torrents on papers and stuff like that without having a NAS or SAN w/ 30+TB of storage. There is 10x more pay in studying a tiny fraction of researchers than there is in paying however many of them. Meta-analysis of some kind through educational surveillance tech is an absolute bitch.
If you're interested in something adjacent that i feel like holds some relevance althought not immediately clear check out a paper called: One index, two publishers and the global research economy
@@Ztarpinka from there, any script kiddy from non-american country can help you setup basic software that takes the way off of most always-on ai using data you've trained on yourself. Like $300-500 USD if you really know how to schmooze.
as for opsec stuff , there are hosted mirrors/portals for just about everything mainstream that logs and shares way too much. invidious, peertube, mastodon, etc# are better but def still flawed. k a G I for search is a good service for finding things on platforms we're still stuck using.