My wife and I enjoyed meeting y'all at the Tyler coin show. It was only our 2nd coin show ever to attend. Looking forward to visiting more shows and seeing y'all again. Thanks for all the informative information you guys provide.
Tyler show sounds like it will be great! Fingers crossed on the CAC submission on the 1799 dollar - from what we see we give it 60% chance at a bean. Love that G4 flying eagle- you are going to start a new trend in collecting. Low ball coins with CAC approval.
I appreciate your careful analysis of coins. You have to have a discerning eye when submitting to CAC. If you don't you're going to end up rather disappointed. Thanks as always!
Thanks for the Bust Dollars in XF 45 comparison, good teaching tool. I wonder if the stronger of the two should'nt have been graded AU50 initially (based on strong residual luster even visible via video ,and the great degree of detail still present), and definitely seeing the weaker of the two as more of a XF40 candidate. Amazing the amount of difference between the two. The PCGS holdered G4 Flying Eagle cent, that then also stickered tickled me! Now all it needs is a special slightly over the top, oak or mahogany, velvet lined, presentation case, and an Acousha collectibles COA signed by both of you gentleman (on showy certificate stock with flambouyant signatures) as well as the signature of an independent 3rd party witness.
It would be nice to see you lads at the York coin fair in England. I suspect theirs not much of a market in the States for foreign coins. But theirs a few hidden US gems and ancients over here.
It's often hard to see the real details on the coins you show cuz you don't zoom in enough however that first 1799 bust is definitely a green CAC sticker. As for the second 1799 , did you take the strike into consideration ,? you were pointing out wear on the hair that might just be a late die strike issue. Send them both in.
I remember that Isabella from a previous video, she's a beauty. i dont really get how the 34S Peace in 62 didnt CAC, that great luster for a 62 As for the mercs, trying to get stickers on anything 66 or higher is asking a lot. CAC gets real stingy on what qualifies as high end for a 66 or more
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Question for anyone... Why not just have CAC grading company grade your coins in the first place? I know everyone is all about having a PCGS holder and a truview image online. But since they switched ownership. The main guy who did the images is gone and they have not been good lately. The main good graders are gone and there are countless videos of people having issues with reliable grading, consistency and experience. It's like the put in adds for all the good positions in the l.a. times comedy chat line. I know most people grade thru PCGS or NGC then go for the CAC sticker. So again, why not just go thru CAC grading from the start?
As an active collector and a member/submitter of CAC stickering community for over 5 years, it is the opinion of many dealers/collectors that the current CACG (grading service) is under grading coins VS. the standards that both NGC and PCGS have established up to this time. I submitted coins initially to CACG when opened to members but have not done so since based on the above opinion.
@@billmason533 there are many videos online of people sending different coins at different times to test the consistency of PCGS grading. One coin with a gash got a 68 but another coin as the person showed under a microscope is flawless and got a 66. Two coins of the exact same year and variant. So is CAC grading just reintroducing professionalism in the market with experienced and realistic evaluations or are they purposely being biased and trying to control the market? In your opinion of course...
@@billmason533 your opinion is what I was asking, as I am asking everyone. I have alot of coins. I am researching this because this is a choice I want to make purely on profits. If I go with a reputable and reliable company. I will be satisfied with their grading, good or bad. However if I make a mistake and go with the deterierating popular choice, I could loose a ton by sending my coins to a group of people who know more about social media memes and Minecraft then coins.
I think people simply enjoy gambling. It kinda seems that it’s all a bit of a racket. Going directly to Cacg will take the fun out of the game for some.
My wife and I enjoyed meeting y'all at the Tyler coin show. It was only our 2nd coin show ever to attend. Looking forward to visiting more shows and seeing y'all again. Thanks for all the informative information you guys provide.
You provide an excellent education on these older coins.
I know that I’m not alone when I learn something new from one of your videos.
True words.
I was there in my booth! I will look for ya next year....
Great informative video !
Tyler show sounds like it will be great! Fingers crossed on the CAC submission on the 1799 dollar - from what we see we give it 60% chance at a bean. Love that G4 flying eagle- you are going to start a new trend in collecting. Low ball coins with CAC approval.
Beutiful coins! I especially love the Liberty dollars!
LETS GO!!!! 10K SOON!!!!!
I’ll be going
That 1799 1$ is definitely a CAC candidate. Wow! What a stark difference a decade can make. 👍
Great video I wish I could make it to the coin show
I appreciate your careful analysis of coins. You have to have a discerning eye when submitting to CAC. If you don't you're going to end up rather disappointed. Thanks as always!
Thanks for the Bust Dollars in XF 45 comparison, good teaching tool. I wonder if the stronger of the two should'nt have been graded AU50 initially (based on strong residual luster even visible via video ,and the great degree of detail still present), and definitely seeing the weaker of the two as more of a XF40 candidate. Amazing the amount of difference between the two. The PCGS holdered G4 Flying Eagle cent, that then also stickered tickled me! Now all it needs is a special slightly over the top, oak or mahogany, velvet lined, presentation case, and an Acousha collectibles COA signed by both of you gentleman (on showy certificate stock with flambouyant signatures) as well as the signature of an independent 3rd party witness.
It would be nice to see you lads at the York coin fair in England. I suspect theirs not much of a market in the States for foreign coins. But theirs a few hidden US gems and ancients over here.
It's often hard to see the real details on the coins you show cuz you don't zoom in enough however that first 1799 bust is definitely a green CAC sticker. As for the second 1799 , did you take the strike into consideration ,? you were pointing out wear on the hair that might just be a late die strike issue. Send them both in.
You know I am looking for an 1875 Philly 20 cent piece. If y’all ever get any I would love to purchase it. Need that date for my set
I sold that Isabella to Preacherbills, lol. Glad to see it got CAC'd.
@@-BigMike- she was a beauty
I was bummed it had already sold last night when I got on your site 😂
if that bust dollar CAC's, I will be an interested buyer
You probably have a Pop 1 on that CAC’d Flying Eagle.
I remember that Isabella from a previous video, she's a beauty.
i dont really get how the 34S Peace in 62 didnt CAC, that great luster for a 62
As for the mercs, trying to get stickers on anything 66 or higher is asking a lot. CAC gets real stingy on what qualifies as high end for a 66 or more
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Question for anyone...
Why not just have CAC grading company grade your coins in the first place? I know everyone is all about having a PCGS holder and a truview image online. But since they switched ownership. The main guy who did the images is gone and they have not been good lately. The main good graders are gone and there are countless videos of people having issues with reliable grading, consistency and experience. It's like the put in adds for all the good positions in the l.a. times comedy chat line. I know most people grade thru PCGS or NGC then go for the CAC sticker.
So again, why not just go thru CAC grading from the start?
As an active collector and a member/submitter of CAC stickering community for over 5 years, it is the opinion of many dealers/collectors that the current CACG (grading service) is under grading coins VS. the standards that both NGC and PCGS have established up to this time.
I submitted coins initially to CACG when opened to members but have not done so since based on the above opinion.
@@billmason533 there are many videos online of people sending different coins at different times to test the consistency of PCGS grading. One coin with a gash got a 68 but another coin as the person showed under a microscope is flawless and got a 66. Two coins of the exact same year and variant.
So is CAC grading just reintroducing professionalism in the market with experienced and realistic evaluations or are they purposely being biased and trying to control the market? In your opinion of course...
Im not defending PCGS or NGC. Just giving my opinion to the question asked why not sending to CACG. Maybe you should ask Drew and Casey.
@@billmason533 your opinion is what I was asking, as I am asking everyone. I have alot of coins. I am researching this because this is a choice I want to make purely on profits. If I go with a reputable and reliable company. I will be satisfied with their grading, good or bad.
However if I make a mistake and go with the deterierating popular choice, I could loose a ton by sending my coins to a group of people who know more about social media memes and Minecraft then coins.
I think people simply enjoy gambling. It kinda seems that it’s all a bit of a racket. Going directly to Cacg will take the fun out of the game for some.
Hmmm
I wish I could afford some of the peace dollars I think they are one of the most beautiful coins in the world.