12. Clustering

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 чер 2024
  • MIT 6.0002 Introduction to Computational Thinking and Data Science, Fall 2016
    View the complete course: ocw.mit.edu/6-0002F16
    Instructor: John Guttag
    Prof. Guttag discusses clustering.
    License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
    More information at ocw.mit.edu/terms
    More courses at ocw.mit.edu

КОМЕНТАРІ • 119

  • @leixun
    @leixun 3 роки тому +47

    *My takeaways:*
    1. DIstance 9:30
    2. k-means algorithm 17:03
    - How to choose k 23:57
    - Unlucky initial centroids 25:56
    - An example 28:58
    - Scale data into the same range 37:11

  • @RaviShankar-vd8en
    @RaviShankar-vd8en 4 роки тому +7

    The explanation level of this video is by far the best I have ever watched. Prof. Guttag does a very good job in explaining every concept more clearly.

  • @wajihaliaquat3365
    @wajihaliaquat3365 4 місяці тому +3

    Professor gifting the ones who contribute to this lecture. Loved that👏💝

  • @jorgebjimenez3752
    @jorgebjimenez3752 5 років тому +16

    K-Means at16.30: one of the very best algorithms in IA

  • @newbie8051
    @newbie8051 Рік тому +1

    Great lecture !
    I attended the Clustering lecture by prof Ayan Seal today (even though I dont have the course : Introduction to Data Science) , he didn't focus a lot on code, but had similar things to share about clustering !

  • @flamingjob2
    @flamingjob2 6 років тому +2

    thank you mit! from singapore . lots of love

  • @handang9165
    @handang9165 3 роки тому +17

    I cant believe I am binge watching MIT lectures. I wish I had a chance to attend MIT back then.

    • @johnwig285
      @johnwig285 Рік тому +3

      Same! But feels great that we get all this for free, its a privilege

  • @MrSrijanb
    @MrSrijanb 6 років тому +115

    it just struck me, after all these lecture videos, that professor Guttag is actually using a classic positive reinforcement technique to make the students more attentive and responsive in class by giving out candies for correct answer. lol! and i am not sure if its the result of this or something else but the students seem wayyy too eager to answer questions in this paticular lecture video!

    • @RogerBarraud
      @RogerBarraud 4 роки тому

      It's Skinner all the way down ;-)

    • @5Gazto
      @5Gazto 4 роки тому +4

      I do it in my classes too.

    • @why400
      @why400 4 роки тому +4

      I bet he would reward any good try - not just correct answers

    • @isbestlizard
      @isbestlizard 3 роки тому +8

      6.006 they gave out cushions for good answers cos the benches were hard.. got the carrot and stick going on at MIT XD

    • @sardorniyozov8843
      @sardorniyozov8843 2 роки тому

      Sheldon would approve

  • @bamb00chka
    @bamb00chka 6 років тому +3

    Pure gold... thank you so much.

  • @AliElamraniElhanchi
    @AliElamraniElhanchi 6 років тому +10

    Very good class! Thanks for the video and for the knowledge!

  • @dontusehername
    @dontusehername 6 років тому +56

    I wish I get the opportunity to sit in a class at MIT someday! Such brilliant minds

    • @JamBear
      @JamBear 3 роки тому +8

      You're just as smart as everyone in the audience. The profs have been doing this for decades.

    • @ai.simplified..
      @ai.simplified.. 2 роки тому +1

      so enjoy your sit

    • @aneedfortheory
      @aneedfortheory 2 роки тому

      Yeah, making a habit at doing something for an extended period creates excellence. Just stick at.

  • @bluescanfly1981
    @bluescanfly1981 5 років тому +2

    I wish I had this professor, would probably love algorithms

  • @sushruthsubramanya
    @sushruthsubramanya 6 років тому +2

    Thank You MIT.

  • @mauricesavery
    @mauricesavery 6 років тому +8

    great professor

  • @naheliegend5222
    @naheliegend5222 5 років тому +1

    love that prof for 4:35 - that is brilliant

  • @prasannakumar1980
    @prasannakumar1980 6 років тому +1

    Awesome explanation.

  • @DoNotBeASIMP
    @DoNotBeASIMP 7 років тому +30

    This professor is awesome!

  • @haneulkim4902
    @haneulkim4902 Рік тому

    Thanks for an amazing lecture! @29:35 it tries to cluster data into two groups and see if it correctly differentiated people who dies of heart attack and those that didn't. To me this is using clustering for classification task, if yes, when would someone use clustering rather than classification?

  • @yusufpriyoanggodo2675
    @yusufpriyoanggodo2675 5 років тому +1

    thank you Prof!

  • @shaileshrana7165
    @shaileshrana7165 2 роки тому +5

    I wanna attend Professor Guttag's classes mostly for the education but also for the candies.

  • @Tom-qe8oj
    @Tom-qe8oj 5 років тому +1

    Great lecture! Informative AND entertaining.

  • @shivaanyakulkarni4357
    @shivaanyakulkarni4357 2 роки тому

    At 28:00, can anyone help here ? How do we compare this dissimilarity (mentioned in IF statement), in Python. Badly need this.

  • @matheusbarros8488
    @matheusbarros8488 2 роки тому +3

    When we are clustering the airports, the professor only stopped to think about linkage when he arrived at Denver. Shouldn't we have thought about it since the beginning of the clustering?
    If so, we could have gotten (BOS, SF) instead of (BOS, NY) for the first iteration using complete linkage.

    • @McAwesomeReaper
      @McAwesomeReaper 7 місяців тому

      Since in the first iteration there are a number of clusters equal to the number of cities, wouldnt complete linkage be the same as single linkage, given there is only one point of measurement for each cluster? I didnt go back to check, but perhaps after the second iteration there wouldve been some different answers?

  • @yuehernkang
    @yuehernkang 5 років тому +2

    great lecture! at the speed where it is easy to understand

  • @marceli1109
    @marceli1109 5 років тому +2

    What are some some methods to evaluate the quality of the clusters, if we do not have an outcome variable? In the example they were evaluated based in part based on whether the subjects in the cluster died at a higher rate. What do I do if I don't have an outcome to look at, only characteristics? For context, I'm creating cognitive style groups based on user data for an insurance company, and these styles will be later used for morphing, churn etc. but do not have an outcome variable per se.

    • @jt007rai
      @jt007rai 5 років тому

      Bi Plot will suffice

  • @BeelySalasBlair-uy5wn
    @BeelySalasBlair-uy5wn 9 місяців тому

    Always helpful, thanks 🧮

  • @henrikmanukyan3152
    @henrikmanukyan3152 3 місяці тому

    Main issues of K-Means : choosing the number of clusters (k) and data scaling: But what if one wants to apply weights to the features (parameters)? Should you just multiply the features with the desired coefficients?

  • @nmtran
    @nmtran 6 років тому

    Amazing!

  • @BaoTran-se4xi
    @BaoTran-se4xi 4 роки тому +3

    The guys who down voted this video must had nothing better to do. The lecture was nicely paced and I think he already made the problem as clear as it can get.
    Anyway, that was a great lecture. A big thank you to Professor Guttag and the MIT OpenCourseWare team.

  • @chanjohn5466
    @chanjohn5466 3 роки тому

    Why we use clustering while we have the label? Like in the medical example, we already know the label (0,1).

  • @bigboi9049
    @bigboi9049 Рік тому

    Is the full code of his examples accessible?

  • @supriamir5251
    @supriamir5251 4 роки тому

    Thanks MIT

  • @adiflorense1477
    @adiflorense1477 3 роки тому +1

    39:54 I think z-scaling is the same as creating a normally distributed dataset

  • @jwall6412
    @jwall6412 4 роки тому

    at 46:50 the professor mentions “has pretty good specificity, or positive predictive value, but its sensitivity is lousy.” can someone explain how specificity = ppv?
    im assuming:
    ppv = tp/(tp+fp)
    specificity = tn/(tn+fp)
    doesnt ppv = precision?

    • @sharan9993
      @sharan9993 3 роки тому

      No ppv means positive predictive value.
      Ur formulas are crct

  • @akshaydixit8039
    @akshaydixit8039 5 років тому +1

    From where can I get the pdf of the same. OR some notes.

    • @mitocw
      @mitocw  5 років тому +3

      The course materials are available for free on MIT OpenCourseWare at: ocw.mit.edu/6-0002F16. Best wishes on your studies!

  • @ericacastilho3039
    @ericacastilho3039 2 роки тому

    Does someone know the name of the book 📚 used and where to access the code he mentioned he distributed?

    • @w1d3r75
      @w1d3r75 2 роки тому

      Mit Open Course Ware website. Just search it by the name of the course

  • @deepakgaur6192
    @deepakgaur6192 5 років тому +4

    That's one amazing lecture !

  • @zachkim1624
    @zachkim1624 5 років тому +2

    16:10 could anyone explain what the professor is talking about when he's mentioning n-squared and n-cubed algorithms ?

    • @TheDaveRoss
      @TheDaveRoss 5 років тому +1

      Pretty sure he is talking about the number of comparisons which need to occur to create the group, n-squared meaning the number of comparisons is on the order of the square of the number of objects to compare, and n-cubed on the order of the cube of the number of objects to compare. Sort of like big-O notation.

    • @johanronkko4494
      @johanronkko4494 4 роки тому

      This is not always the case (depends on the code), but it might help to think of n-squared as 2 nested loops and n-cubed 3 nested loops. For instance, in a n-squared algorithm you have n items where, for each item, you make n comparisons. Imagine a really big n.

    • @RaviShankar-vd8en
      @RaviShankar-vd8en 4 роки тому +1

      He was basically talking about the time complexity of both the algorithms.

  • @aditi17goel
    @aditi17goel Рік тому

    40:00 why is mean 0 and standard deviation 1?

  • @AM-rb4ps
    @AM-rb4ps 4 роки тому +3

    it's dendRogram, with an R. Comes from the word for "tree"

  • @ilhamakhyar4849
    @ilhamakhyar4849 2 роки тому

    Thanks for the lesson professor, it's really good explanation

  • @GainFitnessSystems
    @GainFitnessSystems 5 років тому +1

    What’s the name of the course? And in what college ?

    • @mitocw
      @mitocw  5 років тому

      As the video description states, the course name is "Introduction to Computational Thinking and Data Science" as it was taught in the Fall of 2016 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. For more information, see the course on MIT OpenCourseWare at: ocw.mit.edu/6-0002F16.

  • @Furzgranate666
    @Furzgranate666 3 роки тому +1

    Professor Guttag: 'Dendrogram... I should write that down.'
    also Professor Guttag: mispells it :D

  • @bengbeng2005
    @bengbeng2005 6 років тому +1

    what is the average of examples in the same cluster?

  • @nicolasszernek4359
    @nicolasszernek4359 4 роки тому

    I guess that the statment that he was trying to set as True to scale the data was at line 14. Awesome lecture! Thanks.

  • @NisseOhlsen
    @NisseOhlsen 6 років тому +1

    To quote Dr. Banner: ‘Basic cluster recognition’...

  • @vidhantt
    @vidhantt Місяць тому

    29:06 Isn’t the heart attack example a case of supervised learning, since we have the labels?
    1:59 At the start of the lecture, the professor mentioned clustering as an example of unsupervised learning

  • @KhoaCongngheSinhhoc-CFI
    @KhoaCongngheSinhhoc-CFI 11 місяців тому

    Hello, I come from wet lab and I am not familiar with machine learning. But I am really interested in this topic since I want to apply machine learning to my research in plant genetics. I have watched this video several times but still I have not gotten all the things the professor mentioned. I wonder if the author or anyone can share the lecuter or books in this topic. It will mean alot to me. Thank you in advance.

    • @OK-ri8eu
      @OK-ri8eu 6 днів тому

      A late response but here we go. I would suggest you read the 100 pages machine learning book, it doesn't really really assume any background but of course having it makes things easier.

  • @fwm146
    @fwm146 3 роки тому

    Can anyone link machine learning to digital signal processing for me?

  • @jinruifoo7087
    @jinruifoo7087 3 роки тому

    how do we test different k values when examples are unlabeled?

    • @McAwesomeReaper
      @McAwesomeReaper 7 місяців тому

      Hierarchical clustering. Just stop when you like what you see?

  • @adiflorense1477
    @adiflorense1477 3 роки тому

    What was the thing that John Guttag threw at the student

  • @egecant
    @egecant 4 роки тому

    awesome class. I craved candy while watching it

  • @artemandrianov8700
    @artemandrianov8700 2 роки тому

    i like how Dr. Guttag just throws candy at the students

  • @okonkwo.ify18
    @okonkwo.ify18 Рік тому

    What does he throw to the students who answers ?

  • @hadlevick
    @hadlevick 5 років тому

    Each one choose for itself...

  • @cato447
    @cato447 3 роки тому

    Thats so fucking cool. Explaining how to group data and throwing candy at your students for answering right

  • @emadadel3701
    @emadadel3701 3 роки тому

    what is the reference book ?

    • @mitocw
      @mitocw  3 роки тому +2

      The textbook is: Guttag, John. Introduction to Computation and Programming Using Python: With Application to Understanding Data. 2nd ed. MIT Press, 2016. ISBN: 9780262529624. See the Readings section for more details: ocw.mit.edu/6-0002F16. Best wishes on your studies!

  • @krisdebeukeleer9264
    @krisdebeukeleer9264 4 роки тому

    This is way more comfortable when at 1.25 speed.

  • @robbiesmith79
    @robbiesmith79 2 роки тому +1

    Ok, by minute 7 my mind is wondering if there's going to be a bonus assignment to find the probability that Professor Guttag will correctly throw you the piece of candy on the first try. The odds of you catching it greatly increase the closer your sit to the front center of the room.

  • @chekweitan
    @chekweitan 4 роки тому

    I am feeling stress like in a class with a bunch of genius.

  • @alexanderarnold4810
    @alexanderarnold4810 4 роки тому

    "Clustering" is usually taught to "signal" "alumni" that anyone "in their *network*" can't learn and be good at some skills because some Terrorists in their "*network*" may be affected andor effected.

  • @DuduWakeman
    @DuduWakeman 2 роки тому

    14:20 the distance from Denver to Seattle is 1307 and the distance from Denver to Boston is 1949, so why he clustered Denver to Seattle instead of Boston when using Complete linkage? should it not be clustered to the greatest distance?

    • @username2537
      @username2537 2 роки тому

      No, for complete linkage you look up, as you said the greatest distance of each cluster to the datapoint and then cluster it with the smallest out of these distances.

  • @manishdas6525
    @manishdas6525 5 років тому +4

    MIT: 2 kinds of people.
    Harvard: .........
    Princeton: .........

    • @romanemul1
      @romanemul1 3 роки тому +2

      actually 3. People like you trying to make differences at any price.

  • @djangoworldwide7925
    @djangoworldwide7925 Рік тому

    Data scientists actually have to think. Good one

  • @AmanKhan-bw3rt
    @AmanKhan-bw3rt 4 роки тому

    I want that choco

  • @KDCaine
    @KDCaine 4 роки тому

    23:20

  • @pranavgoyal2366
    @pranavgoyal2366 2 роки тому

    so we are getting candies for every right answer, i am 26 years old and heck yeah!! i would still love to have free candies 👍😜

  • @zainwasem
    @zainwasem 2 роки тому

    Prof john Guttag has banch of Candie's

  • @mbrowne8166
    @mbrowne8166 3 роки тому

    great lecture but the cholate did not reach me.

  • @DrDoomsd
    @DrDoomsd 4 роки тому

    He is treating you like pets. Like little hamsters.

  • @MAAditya
    @MAAditya 3 роки тому

    This man has the mannerisms of Bill Gates

  • @nbgarrett88
    @nbgarrett88 4 роки тому +4

    1:45 Democrat/Republican... Smart/Dumb... Professor, you're being redundant!

  • @MilesBellas
    @MilesBellas Рік тому

    Normal Playback = 1.5x speed

    • @beepbeep767
      @beepbeep767 Рік тому

      if you have adhd yes

    • @MilesBellas
      @MilesBellas Рік тому

      @@beepbeep767
      gaps.....pauses.....deliberations = reduced
      sloooooow intonaaaaation = reduced

  • @ezequiasrocha3037
    @ezequiasrocha3037 3 роки тому +2

    Take care, students, with democrat teachers in computer science classes. They don't care to play with you and call you a dumb if you are a republican and later ask you to choose who is the dumb and who is the smart. I hope you grades doesn't be influencied by you political bias.