Striking a balance between time and overload is a good goal. I like the 10-15 minute videos, timestamps are always an option for those with time sensitivities. Even as someone who typically watches the entirety of the video timestamps are useful for returning playback on specific talking points in the video. Besides that. Thank you for all your work. It's nice to have people who can provide relative experiences across multiple pieces of audio gear. IMO there's a lot on the market and most of it is.... meh. Videos like these help me save time and money when I spend on ear-gear and your enthusiasm in the subject is refreshing over the two-bit reviews of earbuds you find on TikTok. Thanks again.
Please dont get rid of your subjectivity! Its always great to hear peopls personal thoughts and everything than just specs! If i wanted specs id go to google!!
Hey! Congratulations again! Thanks for what you're doing. I've actually tried both QC and QC Ultra since that time, as well as M4. And the latter appeared a winner for my use case. Partially because I've experienced absolutely NO issues you've described in your M4 review some time ago :) Maybe a hardware revision, maybe software, who knows, but nevertheless. Anyway, I agree that these two are strong competitors and deserve a comparison for those who are still in doubts. As for closed content, time will tell. But having quality regular open content is crucial for channel (well deserved) growth. So wise decision with shorter-longer versions, question is in balance I think.
The M4 is an excellent choice, and they’ve fixed many of the issues I experienced. It still connects when it shouldn’t at times, and I still hear about QC issues, but it’s still my most recommended headphone because of value.
Thanks for the request. It’s not in the plans now, but if it’s one I can find and get the time, at least a short review wouldn’t be out of the picture.
Striking a balance between time and overload is a good goal. I like the 10-15 minute videos, timestamps are always an option for those with time sensitivities. Even as someone who typically watches the entirety of the video timestamps are useful for returning playback on specific talking points in the video. Besides that. Thank you for all your work. It's nice to have people who can provide relative experiences across multiple pieces of audio gear. IMO there's a lot on the market and most of it is.... meh. Videos like these help me save time and money when I spend on ear-gear and your enthusiasm in the subject is refreshing over the two-bit reviews of earbuds you find on TikTok. Thanks again.
Thank you for the kind words and the feedback. I will definitely be keeping this in mind.
Please dont get rid of your subjectivity! Its always great to hear peopls personal thoughts and everything than just specs! If i wanted specs id go to google!!
Noted! Thank you for taking the time to respond. I truly appreciate it!
@@NorbReviews also great win in my eyes for subjectivity in the problems that you might!
Hey! Congratulations again! Thanks for what you're doing.
I've actually tried both QC and QC Ultra since that time, as well as M4. And the latter appeared a winner for my use case. Partially because I've experienced absolutely NO issues you've described in your M4 review some time ago :) Maybe a hardware revision, maybe software, who knows, but nevertheless. Anyway, I agree that these two are strong competitors and deserve a comparison for those who are still in doubts.
As for closed content, time will tell. But having quality regular open content is crucial for channel (well deserved) growth. So wise decision with shorter-longer versions, question is in balance I think.
The M4 is an excellent choice, and they’ve fixed many of the issues I experienced. It still connects when it shouldn’t at times, and I still hear about QC issues, but it’s still my most recommended headphone because of value.
Hey can you do a review on the Sennheiser 250 BT
Thanks for the request. It’s not in the plans now, but if it’s one I can find and get the time, at least a short review wouldn’t be out of the picture.
@@NorbReviews thanks