We're going to see a lot of rental units being sold off: changes to capital gains tax

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 кві 2024
  • Davelle Morrison, broker at Bosley Real Estate, discusses what the increased tax inclusion rate could mean for people who hold investment properties.
    Subscribe to BNN Bloomberg to watch more videos: / bnnbloomberg
    Connect with BNN Bloomberg:
    For the latest news visit: www.bnnbloomberg.ca
    For a full video offering visit BNN Bloomberg: www.bnnbloomberg.ca/video
    BNN Bloomberg on Facebook: / bnnbloomberg
    BNN Bloomberg on Twitter: / bnnbloomberg
    BNN Bloomberg on Instagram: / bnnbloomberg
    BNN Bloomberg on LinkedIn: / bnn-bloomberg
    --
    BNN Bloomberg is Canada’s only TV service devoted exclusively to business, finance and the markets.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 966

  • @Cammimullens
    @Cammimullens 12 днів тому +154

    Recently bought some recommended stocks and now they are just penny stocks. There seems to be more negative portfolios in the last 3rd half of 2023 with markets tumbling, soaring inflation, and banks going out of business. My concern is how can the rapid interest-rate hike be of favor to a value investor, or is it better avoiding stocks for a while?

    • @softy-bf5eg
      @softy-bf5eg 12 днів тому

      Just ''buy the dip'' man. In the long term it will payoff. High interest rates usually mean lower stock prices, however investors should be cautious of the bull run, its best you connect with a well-qualified adviser to meet your growth goals and avoid blunder

    • @TitaAnderson
      @TitaAnderson 12 днів тому

      The truth is that this is really not as difficult as many people presume it to be. It requires a certain level of diligence, no doubt, which is something ordinary investors lack, and so a financial advisor often comes in very handy. My friend just pulled in more than $84k last month alone from his investment with his advisor. That is how people are able to make such huge profits in the market

    • @marlisamirabal
      @marlisamirabal 12 днів тому

      nice! once you hit a big milestone, the next comes easier.. who is your advisor please, if you don't mind me asking?

    • @TitaAnderson
      @TitaAnderson 12 днів тому

      ANGELA LYNN SCHILLING' is her name. She is regarded as a genius in her area and works for Empower Financial Services. She’s quite known in her field, look-her up.

    • @marlisamirabal
      @marlisamirabal 12 днів тому

      Thank you for this tip. It was easy to find your coach. Did my due diligence on her before scheduling a phone call with her. She seems proficient considering her resume.

  • @user-xf5ki7sj4r
    @user-xf5ki7sj4r 15 днів тому +300

    I hope someday Canada will get rid of these brokers/agents, who does nothing but ready to take commission. They add no productivity to the country.

    • @bc41
      @bc41 14 днів тому +11

      if we reduce their commission, we can save and pay tax instead, even if we don't increase the tax? so the government should chase after agents, not investors

    • @maydayace5651
      @maydayace5651 14 днів тому

      Oh! It's my time to shine. I actually work along side brokers/agents in Ontario Canada. The commission prices I have seen have been between 2.5% to 5% of the total cost of the sale/lease/rental with maybe a split if there is another agent/broker company involved. It's mainly due to how big the price of the property is. Also, remember they are on commission only. No salary pay, and they could not be paid their commission for over a year because of when the deal is closed/moved into. So, yes you could be paid $2,000 in a month or over $50,000; but you could also not be paid for 8 months because none of your listings or clients have anything to show for in the market. Their job, if they want to be successful, they need to be available 24/7 for answering questions, showing space, send dozens of paperwork that sadly has to get done over again the next week, and stuck on the phone with no time for family or friends. Now looking at property managers on the other hand; they get paid lots and give back few things to their tenants.

    • @dev4statingx90
      @dev4statingx90 14 днів тому +6

      There will be an app for that eventually

    • @violetgypsie
      @violetgypsie 14 днів тому +28

      What needs to happen is that the MLS system that realtors use needs to be available to homeowners. You can currently sell your own home without an agent, but you then won’t have access to the MLS system and your house won’t show up on it. That needs to change.

    • @auric7482
      @auric7482 14 днів тому +7

      My real estate agent was a huge help. How many properties have you had to buy and sell?

  • @kalebb7170
    @kalebb7170 15 днів тому +192

    "it's not just the wealthy. If you have to sell the family cottage, it'll impact you too."
    Oh shit, not my middle class family cottage! I have like 10 of those!

    • @slsilver481
      @slsilver481 14 днів тому +17

      Lol. I needed this comment 😅

    • @MustyBastard
      @MustyBastard 14 днів тому +21

      My family cottage = a cardboard box at the beach.

    • @violetgypsie
      @violetgypsie 14 днів тому +49

      So you think it’s okay to tax people to oblivion for a property they’ve owned for years? What about people whose parents passed away and they need to sell that home? You think it’s okay to steal their money? The money that was used to buy that home had already been taxed.

    • @nicktw8688
      @nicktw8688 14 днів тому +1

      Haw haw, good one!

    • @joeinthebush
      @joeinthebush 14 днів тому +11

      It's not a cottage....it's a CHALET.....

  • @TakuyaTamasiro
    @TakuyaTamasiro 12 днів тому +249

    I'm favoured $130k every 4weeks! I now have a good house and can now afford anything and also support my family

    • @obelix998
      @obelix998 12 днів тому

      Wow that's huge, how do you make that much monthly?
      I'm 37 and have been looking for ways to be successful, please how ??

    • @TakuyaTamasiro
      @TakuyaTamasiro 12 днів тому

      Thanks to my co-worker (Alex) who suggested Claudia rea Lovell.
      She's a licensed broker in the states 🇱🇷🇱🇷

    • @TakuyaTamasiro
      @TakuyaTamasiro 12 днів тому

      After I raised up to 325k trading with her I bought a new House and a car here in the states 🇺🇸🇺🇸 also paid for my son's surgery (Oscar). Glory to God.shalom .

    • @obelix998
      @obelix998 12 днів тому

      that's nice She makes you that much!! please is there a way to reach her services, I work 3 jobs and trying to pay off my debts for a while now!! Please help me.

    • @EduardoBeppler
      @EduardoBeppler 12 днів тому

      Great to see you guys talking about her,she changed the game.
      Finding yourself a good broker is as same as finding a good wife, which you go less stress,you get just enough ywith so much little effort at things

  • @adrianoc4386
    @adrianoc4386 15 днів тому +77

    Perhaps this was the intent of these changes- to chase the highly leveraged property 'moguls' (owners of 2-3 rented units) out of the condo sector.

    • @dev4statingx90
      @dev4statingx90 14 днів тому +5

      The war on workers

    • @tehabnorm
      @tehabnorm 14 днів тому +1

      That seems obvious to me

    • @silverfox1234
      @silverfox1234 14 днів тому +4

      2-3 ? Try 50-100 units

    • @maranorth
      @maranorth 13 днів тому

      Not sure at all that is the intent. Corporations like Greenwin own massive blocks of real estate that they will never sell. This will not affect them.
      This will affect someone who is renting our their condo bc they got married and bought a larger place. So now do they sell and kick out their tenant?

    • @bestself2438
      @bestself2438 13 днів тому +2

      2-3 rental units is a mogul? That’s a dentist or pharmacist salary. Wow.

  • @zinithin-8208
    @zinithin-8208 14 днів тому +26

    Am I the only one who thinks the guy is correct and the lady is wrong? “When you leave Canada, you are considered to have sold certain types of property (even if you have not sold them) at their fair market value (FMV) and to have immediately reacquired them for the same amount. This is called a deemed disposition and you may have to report a capital gain (also known as departure tax).” If you stop living in Canada as a permanent resident you are going to get hit on the capital gains tax anyways! lol that lady doesn’t know what she is talking about. If you’re a resident you pay tax in Canada even when you make money from outside the country.

    • @gruntlord6
      @gruntlord6 11 днів тому +2

      She also seems to think rentals will go down in popularity if people aren't flipping houses, where as one would think it would incentivise people to hold onto the rental property long term

    • @globetrotter8556
      @globetrotter8556 11 днів тому

      The moment you stop being tax resident, you don’t pay Canadian taxes. The government can however have withholding tax on properties that generate income but it can never tax the capital gains tax as if the owners are dead.

    • @stevestevens502
      @stevestevens502 11 днів тому +1

      it should be 0

    • @shiftyrazzy
      @shiftyrazzy 6 днів тому

      not if you hide it hun. If the government doesn't know they wont tax you. Especially if you're wealthy.

    • @Jihada
      @Jihada 6 днів тому +1

      Thats what I thought too but, she is saying to open an investment company abroad just in name basically, and through that company you buy property. So the property is not on your name but in the investment company's name so you have nothing to declare on your behalf as long as you dont bring that money from the company back to canada.

  • @fawadpopal99
    @fawadpopal99 15 днів тому +105

    She was supposed to make an argument against the new changes to the capital gain taxes. Instead she pitched about the shady tax havens in Caribbean Islands for real estate investing and her dislike for Canada and the US.

    • @Bradinnes
      @Bradinnes 15 днів тому +34

      She's reminding people that there are other options for investors that are tax free and their capital is safe unlike what the federal government just did. There's something going on with the working class in this country that seem to think investors and people of wealth are the problem some how. People who invest have to work hard to achieve and they build business and equity in this country, if they decide Canada's not worth it good bye middle class! It's already in decline :(

    • @jptrainor
      @jptrainor 14 днів тому

      She's eagerly anticipating a juicy quarter.

    • @funkspinna
      @funkspinna 14 днів тому +12

      She made the case of why such people would be looking for investment elsewher3.

    • @fawadpopal99
      @fawadpopal99 14 днів тому +16

      @@funkspinna Canada needs real investors in tech startups. Not a bunch of arbitrageurs in single unit real estate who bring only misery to the country. I see a lot of issues with the new rules for capital gain taxation but real estate is not one of those issues.

    • @funkspinna
      @funkspinna 14 днів тому +4

      @@fawadpopal99 who said it didn't need investors in tech? That doesn't change the fact that reducing rental supplt, as a result of the new tax, will push up prices.

  • @Marxistsrcnts
    @Marxistsrcnts 14 днів тому +38

    I disagree. Local property Investors will hold onto Assets as the exit costs just increased. Investors will sit on the units until the next government. This will create a higher supply, driving up the housing prices and the Cap gains tax obligations further, This will become a self perpetuating cycle.

    • @silverfox1234
      @silverfox1234 14 днів тому +3

      Another way of looking at it is their exit profits have decreased as it isnt money coming out of their pockets.
      What this will do is hopefully decrease investors from purchasing more places for flipping. Prices of housing will come down as most ppl cant afford +$1M for units, if investors stop scooping them up.

    • @mr.uthamaputhiran9790
      @mr.uthamaputhiran9790 12 днів тому +2

      @@silverfox1234 Exactly, less lucrative for house flipping, less attractive for investors.

  • @hassi7914
    @hassi7914 14 днів тому +14

    There are so many Canadians who are investors! What about the people who have been saving money and making the right business moves for the past 3 decades and bought an investment property to rent out to supplement retirement income. What if they want to sell now? Of course they are affected by this capital gains tax because they bought so long ago. This isn’t taxing the rich! This is taxing hard working Canadians.

  • @michael2275
    @michael2275 15 днів тому +131

    3:05 Crazy that their world of 'investing' is exclusively real estate. So Canadian, part of the problem...

    • @violetgypsie
      @violetgypsie 15 днів тому +7

      Who do you think provides rental properties in Canada? This is going to make the housing problem worse as these rental properties are dumped on the market fast and will wipe out existing rentals.

    • @jptrainor
      @jptrainor 15 днів тому +4

      ​@@violetgypsieA correction has been brewing for a while. This might contribute to triggering what was inevitable.

    • @violetgypsie
      @violetgypsie 14 днів тому +2

      @@jptrainor A “correction” of less available rentals will drive up housing prices. Market value = supply + demand.

    • @jptrainor
      @jptrainor 14 днів тому +15

      @@violetgypsie If prices correct and properties trade at lower prices then they will have lower mortgages behind them, which translates to lower rent requirement for them to be viable investments. If the properties are purchased as primary residences then rental demand is lower. Closer to a sustainable equilibrium.

    • @violetgypsie
      @violetgypsie 14 днів тому +4

      @@jptrainor How are priced going to correct to lower prices when we have a deficit of 5 million homes right now? There is too much demand and not enough supply. There is no way housing prices are coming down anytime soon.

  • @andrewthaboss6643
    @andrewthaboss6643 14 днів тому +38

    "Regular" canadian investing in the british Virgin islands 👀
    This lady respectfully is not living in reality

    • @gk6199
      @gk6199 14 днів тому +8

      Probably cheaper then Toronto. That's how much of a joke this country is.

    • @slammy333
      @slammy333 14 днів тому +2

      ​@@gk6199If only housing wasnt being withheld

    • @perryham
      @perryham 10 днів тому

      Well, she did break straws back with a camel

    • @quantifiablyqorrect2905
      @quantifiablyqorrect2905 8 днів тому +1

      It was an example, she exposed how dumb all the liberals policy is, and how the future of canada is dying fast

    • @efestian5993
      @efestian5993 8 днів тому +1

      you are just naive and don't know how to do it. I spend winters in Bahamas and there were thousands of regular middle class Canadians just I that country alone.These are not millionaires. These are 50+ Canadians. Just because you don't understand how to do it, does not mean it is not so.

  • @ron.mexico.
    @ron.mexico. 15 днів тому +166

    Rich people will navigate through this without any issues. As always, the less fortunate are gonna pay for this.

    • @jameswells9403
      @jameswells9403 15 днів тому +6

      Yeah, they will just shift their portfolios to something that avoid capital gains to minimize tax.
      If it gets worse, they will leave the country for six months a year and live abroad so they have to pay taxes.

    • @Vengeance8888
      @Vengeance8888 15 днів тому +5

      That is true, the poor always pays

    • @zachweyrauch2988
      @zachweyrauch2988 15 днів тому +7

      Hang on now, we are talking about calital gains. At the worst those affected will have to be mildly fortunate.

    • @user-zx9hs7gx4i
      @user-zx9hs7gx4i 15 днів тому +14

      Less fortunate or those who were silly enough to thunk min wage jobs students traditionally held are solid career choices? Or those who make bad life decisions...don't get an education... have kids they can't afford....buy new vehicles complete with 8 year loans...always have the latest iPhone... yeah I know a lot of unfortunate people like that...... and they are always the ones complaining about not having money or getting ahead......

    • @shakyjake2133
      @shakyjake2133 14 днів тому

      @@user-zx9hs7gx4i You sound triggered. Maybe you're one of those people. How can you blame people for this when the government's budget is printing out absurd amounts of money while tax on tax ofn tax with 0 benefit to our country?
      You will own nothing and be happy. Enjoy relying on the government.

  • @bryankerr9174
    @bryankerr9174 15 днів тому +151

    So this is good news for people wanting to own a property to live in. Maybe these "investors" could do something productive like start a business. Or they can leave and make real estate more affordable again.

    • @user-zx9hs7gx4i
      @user-zx9hs7gx4i 15 днів тому +14

      And what do all those people do who can't, don't want to, can't afford to own do? Thank turdo for this mess we are in...these punitive policies would be unnecessary if not him and those that support him!!!

    • @funkspinna
      @funkspinna 14 днів тому +26

      False. As stated, more rentals have been provided by private investors then the government. Reducing that supply will push up the prices even more.

    • @zacloomer1921
      @zacloomer1921 14 днів тому +12

      Ain’t no one starting a business in the country now. Also the carbon tax just went up, gonna have to charge you for all that hot air you’re spewing

    • @jameswells9403
      @jameswells9403 14 днів тому

      @funkspinna Yay, neoliberalism. Tax people, cut all services, cut public affordable housing, defund public transport, and then give that money to corporate. Right.

    • @user-zx9hs7gx4i
      @user-zx9hs7gx4i 14 днів тому +7

      @@zacloomer1921 100 % people like me are taking our money out of this country..... then who's going to pay the bills.... I have had enough

  • @CruxfromAI
    @CruxfromAI 15 днів тому +24

    No logic at all “if someone buying a property, it will be either occupied by the buyer or rented out to other tenant.” The net effect, or the ratio of tenants to the properties won’t change.

    • @mechano6505
      @mechano6505 15 днів тому +16

      they're acting as if there isn't a huge demand build up for housing, if investors sell their rental properties then individuals will buy it all up.

    • @snoopfroggyfrog7220
      @snoopfroggyfrog7220 13 днів тому +1

      ​@@mechano6505 PLUS they'll have to sell them at a price that's affordable to someone just looking for a primary residence

    • @user-vi8ci2bi6b
      @user-vi8ci2bi6b 12 днів тому +3

      The next person who buys it after a correction will have lower mortgage costs and will be able to charge less rent.
      The only road to affordability.

    • @shojingod
      @shojingod 12 днів тому

      @@user-vi8ci2bi6b Finally somebody gets it. Also it will give more incentive for first home buyers with availability to get out of high priced rents for a mortgage which in turn lower rents which in turn would makes corporate home purchasing less lucrative and lower corporate home buying or even cause them to get out of the housing market all together putting more homes on the market.

  • @latorregolf
    @latorregolf 15 днів тому +74

    Over leveraged real estate speculators getting hurt. Jesus wept.

    • @tammyvibes87
      @tammyvibes87 14 днів тому

      exactly. Just another scare tactic they are trying to project on regular people

    • @ironhell813
      @ironhell813 14 днів тому +1

      The assets will still end up on the hands of those that abuse, and the poor will do without, so you’re right Jesus wouldave wept if he still tolerated living in try is luciferian hellhole we call an existence.

    • @littlethings8331
      @littlethings8331 14 днів тому

      @@notsoinsaneguy That's exactly what the liberals want you to believe. The reality is as long as Canada let immigration run unchecked people will always prefer speculating in the real estate markets since there's always demand.

    • @tehabnorm
      @tehabnorm 14 днів тому

      ​@@notsoinsaneguyand you will continue to be controlled by inferiors submitting to their will, voting is immoral

    • @rampagestiddies
      @rampagestiddies 13 днів тому +1

      Where do you rent?

  • @maggiemacaskill1037
    @maggiemacaskill1037 15 днів тому +37

    You do have to declare when you own property over 100k abroad. Asks you on the tax form every year. I'm a tax professional

    • @7966016
      @7966016 15 днів тому +11

      They might ask you, but that doesn't mean you have to pay taxes. It all depends where your property is located, as the lady stated@

    • @richardcalisi9188
      @richardcalisi9188 14 днів тому

      not really...depending where you go.

    • @Jihada
      @Jihada 6 днів тому

      not if said property is owned by an investment company that you open in said country.

  • @jptrainor
    @jptrainor 15 днів тому +59

    If rental property investors were investing for capital gains then that's a problem right there. It speaks to the unsustainable bubble that we are in the midst of.

    • @StonkSlayd
      @StonkSlayd 15 днів тому +4

      They aren't.

    • @davidhughes6048
      @davidhughes6048 15 днів тому +9

      Why is that a problem? What do you invest for? Losses? It’s not investing if there is no expectation of profit. Please enlighten me.

    • @Cutlerypotato
      @Cutlerypotato 15 днів тому

      @@davidhughes6048 speculation vs. Investment

    • @jptrainor
      @jptrainor 15 днів тому +1

      @@davidhughes6048 Income.

    • @user-zx9hs7gx4i
      @user-zx9hs7gx4i 15 днів тому +5

      That is why you invest in real estate..... owning properties myself I know that at the end of the day that is the only place to make a return and it's not as much as people think all things considered..... and it can turn up to be a loss depending on your tenants...... frankly many people were thinking of getting out of owning investment properties to begin with for those very reasons

  • @fen4554
    @fen4554 14 днів тому +61

    If your family has a cottage or a family home in Toronto core to sell, you are wealthy. Don't kid yourself.

    • @MrMooCow199
      @MrMooCow199 14 днів тому +7

      Really? Most people who buy aren't rich. Buying a home doesn't mean you have millions of dollars. It just means you have debt that you must pay off in 25-30 years.

    • @WizPigTactics
      @WizPigTactics 14 днів тому +3

      @@MrMooCow199 He's talking about a second home so it's very likely they are rich. Since a family home you can sell is a home you aren't living in.

    • @angelasoWA
      @angelasoWA 14 днів тому

      Grandparents home that needs to be sold. What the hell?!

    • @elena2125
      @elena2125 14 днів тому

      @@WizPigTactics So if some body sells their one and only home, then will they be paying tax?

    • @WizPigTactics
      @WizPigTactics 14 днів тому +2

      @@elena2125 it doesn't affect single home owners

  • @brasssnacks8413
    @brasssnacks8413 15 днів тому +59

    Who care about investors? They're an unproductive blight on the economy. Landlords investing in other countries is a loss to our country? Are they going to carry homes across the boarder? Who do people think these rentals are getting sold to when they're sold off?

    • @bsstyle123
      @bsstyle123 14 днів тому +11

      If you had the money to invest you wouldn't be saying this...

    • @tammyvibes87
      @tammyvibes87 14 днів тому

      @@bsstyle123 hard working people don't have the money to invest either. It's just a scare tactic mortgage brokers are trying to project to us. They lose when prices go down.

    • @brasssnacks8413
      @brasssnacks8413 14 днів тому +10

      @@bsstyle123 People who say things like that are people I expect would mug people for money if they thought they could get away with it. Is the only thing keeping you from doing public harm for personal profit opportunity and freedom of consequence? Believe it or not, most people don't want to exploit others.

    • @brettthomas5605
      @brettthomas5605 14 днів тому +19

      I'm a senior citizen and also an investor. According to you, one of the blights on our society.
      These investments,I make, go into my pension portfolio that provides me a living allowance to live on.
      So I'm self-supporting and don't have to rely on the government.
      Comments like yours are ridiculous!

    • @brasssnacks8413
      @brasssnacks8413 14 днів тому

      @@brettthomas5605 That money doesn't come from you which means it's not self supporting. All profits are unpaid wages. You're simply living off the labour of others. You are skimming off the productivity of others, so, yes, strictly speaking you are one of the blights. It's mathematically impossible for everyone whose labour you skim off of to one day be in your position unless we have infinite exponential growth. You give yourself a pat on the back for not relying on the government when you live off the labour of others. Comments like yours are what are ridiculous as is referring to it as "self-supporting" because you've never taken a moment to wonder where that money even comes from. Just another disconnected boomer whose greatest accomplishment was being born in the correct year. Must be nice to feel so accomplished for other peoples work. Next you'll tell me landlords provide housing.

  • @kmurray5324
    @kmurray5324 13 днів тому +29

    I own a rental property that i was hoping to sell to help me financially in retirement. The only people this hurts is small investors and retirees

    • @mr.uthamaputhiran9790
      @mr.uthamaputhiran9790 12 днів тому +4

      Based on when you retire, house prices might more than cover the tax loss. This is to discourage corporate house flippers from short term gains and we welcome this move.

    • @animalmother5287
      @animalmother5287 12 днів тому +3

      Oh you poor thing

    • @klnrklnr4433
      @klnrklnr4433 12 днів тому +2

      soooo you're not going to get quite as large a windfall? boo fn hoo.

    • @jimmynewtron221
      @jimmynewtron221 11 днів тому +5

      You're going to get nothing but grief from folks here for being "rich". The fact you made sacrifices and took chances with your money never seem to enter the equation. I guess you were just lucky...
      This change (along with others) will drive folks with means out of Canada. No one likes have a criminal organization as a partner.

    • @Brian-dg3gh
      @Brian-dg3gh 10 днів тому

      Sell your primary residence and move into it if that is an option.

  • @thejuice3819
    @thejuice3819 13 днів тому +9

    Private foreign money being landlords was part of the problem to begin with

  • @GoingCountry
    @GoingCountry 12 днів тому +4

    And so renters will begin to lose their housing. I wonder how backed up the Landlord & Tenant Board will be in the coming months. Tenants who know their rights and how the system works will insist on waiting for a hearing. What a mess.

  • @marc37921
    @marc37921 14 днів тому +56

    This woman is out to lunch. People only rent because they can't afford to buy. The more investors leave the market, the less demand there is and the more pricess will come back to earth. Can't wait for some sort of normalcy to return to prices. Let them go buy up all the u.s. properties.

    • @vietquoctrinh7648
      @vietquoctrinh7648 14 днів тому +5

      The reason renter are renting is that they don't have money to buy, and investors are the driving force behind presales that can afford to lock up a large chunk of cash for years so that housing projects can be built. And, builders are not going to work for free, or take on risks without a buyer to ensure that they are going to buy.

    • @MsMWms-bj5rm
      @MsMWms-bj5rm 14 днів тому +2

      No, dont buy up U.S. properties. The underclass in the U.S. face similar challenges when trying to secure a home. Several U.S. cities have a housing shortage because properties are owned by "Titans"of business" who rent the properties as short term vacation spots! Their are entire apartment complexes devoted exclusively to short term rental/vacation rental/corporate housing schemes.

    • @tehabnorm
      @tehabnorm 14 днів тому

      Not the only reason but the main reason

    • @amandaahmadi9582
      @amandaahmadi9582 14 днів тому

      No, this has ruined the Florida market because now those same dumb greedy investors from foreign countries who bought houses here for Airbnb’s are flooding the market! They are making the prices tank, after they made them pump up. I think it’s time we stop any foreign national from buying investment properties in America.

    • @Kibatsume1
      @Kibatsume1 13 днів тому +1

      This is not true.i know many who do not buy because they do not want to deal with up keep.
      My brother moves every 5 years by choice.
      I have a few clients that work as technicians they get transferred alot.
      Some people like to travel for work. They will spend months in one state before moving on traveling nurses do this as well.
      Just for the record whenever the government besides to increase capital gains tax prices to go up more.
      Where I live people voted to increase taxes on rental income/capital gains.
      All it did was raise the cost of rent for houses and commercial buildings making it harder for the ma and pa business I work at to stay afloat

  • @Dearthair
    @Dearthair 14 днів тому +4

    I love how the media is trying SO HARD to convince us that it's bad that rich people are going to have to pay capital gains tax. O NOES. WE'LL HAVE TO SELL OUR FOURTH AND FIFTH PROPERTIES. Yeah. That's the point. Get bent, let the rest of us own something at some point.

  • @zeuszz8722
    @zeuszz8722 14 днів тому +8

    hahah "consult with mortgage brokers" this made me chuckle!

  • @maestrovso
    @maestrovso 14 днів тому +4

    I left Canada for US over 30 years ago, and never look back. Sadly I urged my brother and his wife to do same and they didn't.
    I remember a wise coworker love to joke, there are three kinds of Torontonians by financial hierarchy. Those who read Toronto Sun for the Sunshine Girl, those who read the Toronto Star, and those who read the Globe and Mail.

    • @klnrklnr4433
      @klnrklnr4433 12 днів тому

      never looked back but here you are in a comments section regarding canadian policy?
      too much time on your hands I guess. toronto sun clientele can't actually read.

    • @maestrovso
      @maestrovso 12 днів тому

      @@klnrklnr4433 I read WSJ and FT after I left. You wouldn't know what they are. My cap gain tax is just 15%. Enjoy your Canadian tax and spend rewards.

  • @musicbygoldenj
    @musicbygoldenj 14 днів тому +2

    Just closed. Got my money out of Canada before the tax changes, made out like a bandit. Now setting up a corporation in the Caribbean and looking at places to setup primary residence.
    Tenants are screwed unfortunately, all just received a 60-day move-out notice from new owners. Rent will skyrocket.
    Canada was cool but the winters are cold and the tax changes put a chill on things for me. Time to move on, life is too short.

  • @jonathonsmith8871
    @jonathonsmith8871 14 днів тому +34

    These people are so out of touch talking about their cottage homes and international investments😂😂. Take a drive down Hastings street and tell me what you see. This country has gone to 💩

    • @huskavarnaband
      @huskavarnaband 14 днів тому +2

      It's not just hastings, it's spread to many side streets now

    • @tehabnorm
      @tehabnorm 14 днів тому +1

      It's spread into small towns

    • @icantwiththis
      @icantwiththis 14 днів тому

      The shit rolls downhill.

    • @Haxerous
      @Haxerous 13 днів тому +1

      Imagine bringing up tax heavens and mortgage brokers in this. She's lucky that people are polite over here.

    • @cancerman3954
      @cancerman3954 12 днів тому

      And floats to the top

  • @dtownssqwe
    @dtownssqwe 14 днів тому +6

    Transfer ownership before parents pass away is best

    • @sparx6354
      @sparx6354 14 днів тому +3

      Yeah, try to get your parents on board for that one

    • @MissMaggieLSLC
      @MissMaggieLSLC 10 днів тому

      You would still be obligated to pay property transfer tax on this transaction at the lawyer. Maybe just add another person to title? Need to check this with a lawyer.

    • @dtownssqwe
      @dtownssqwe 10 днів тому +1

      @@MissMaggieLSLC yes ppl are confused on my original post. If I can elaborate, if your parents have you in their will to leave the family home to you it is typically better for them to transfer ownership to you before they pass away then for them to leave it in their will. The details on how a lawyer does the transfer I am not sure on but many ppl do go this route as it works out less financially and less stress.

    • @MissMaggieLSLC
      @MissMaggieLSLC 9 днів тому +1

      @@dtownssqwe Yes I agree..you're onto something here! This is something I need to bring up with my parents and lawyer to see. From my understanding you're paying a property transfer tax when going on title and some legal fees. It's definitely something to consider!
      Thanks for the food for thought...

  • @gilliantohver3225
    @gilliantohver3225 14 днів тому +18

    Dirty secret: this whole problem is from us, as a society, saying that houing is ok to make an asset for driving wealth, not a human need.
    Nothing is going to work until we decide to change how we see housing. As is, homeowners don't want to change that hurts their equity, banks and builders don't want chnge that affects their profits, and politicians don't want change because most of their voter base are long-time homeowners still (upside down population pyramid, with veey few young people).

    • @thomasw5466
      @thomasw5466 14 днів тому +2

      You should go to Cuba

    • @slammy333
      @slammy333 14 днів тому

      ​@@thomasw5466You should go to somalia. Free of government meddling and regulation!

    • @gilliantohver3225
      @gilliantohver3225 13 днів тому +2

      @thomasw5466 No thanks; I don't subscribe to tyranny on either side of the aisle (oligarchy-feigning-communism or unfettered-capitalist-fascism).
      I am in the middle: tempered capitalism rooted in humanitarianism. That is called socialism (not to be confused with communism, which is total anti-capitalist).
      I believe in free markets, just nnot totally unhinged ones that regarding a fundamental human right like basic shelter.

    • @shauncameron8390
      @shauncameron8390 12 днів тому

      @@gilliantohver3225
      Somalia is a post-communist no man's land.
      Which doesn't even work without capitalism to prop it up.

    • @shauncameron8390
      @shauncameron8390 12 днів тому

      @@slammy333
      Somalia is that real communist utopia by definition.

  • @smokestacklightning
    @smokestacklightning 15 днів тому +10

    Wah, i love my wealth- need every penny- I’m leaving. Hah, let them go, get out already! Tax those that can afford it and who want to stay and move forward. Housing is a basic need turned into an investment Gambit by irresponsibly low post pandemic interest rates.

  • @mikeb5664
    @mikeb5664 15 днів тому +51

    Good, sell them to people who want to own a home.

    • @wjjz8902
      @wjjz8902 15 днів тому +9

      Sure..do you have the down payment and monthly qualifications for a mortgage....

    • @jerredjones9900
      @jerredjones9900 15 днів тому

      Hey Mike, if you truly believe in supply & demand, then yes quite possibly. If you take that at face value, and the number of available units spikes the price will drop in turn.
      Then people working a job will maybe able to afford them again! Now that is optimistic thinking, but if the market works, then your point is not as strong as you think it is.

    • @user-zx9hs7gx4i
      @user-zx9hs7gx4i 14 днів тому +4

      Prices won't come down if that's what you're hoping.... at today's rents which are not going to change people will buy these rentals and keep them rentals and boot the tenants out...... it will be a wash and this policy will inflate costs to renters and home buyers

    • @mikeb5664
      @mikeb5664 14 днів тому

      @@user-zx9hs7gx4i It won't be a wash, they'll take all that capital gains tax increase and build affordable homes for those that need it.

  • @lovingpeace9715
    @lovingpeace9715 14 днів тому +6

    Canadians cannot compete with housing investors and especially foreign investors in the Canadian housing market.
    So good ridence

    • @NeilB.-rv2ww
      @NeilB.-rv2ww 12 днів тому

      Foreign investors are already banned.

  • @DavidBrendan7799
    @DavidBrendan7799 15 днів тому +52

    We're going to see a lot of rental units being sold off?
    TO WHO?
    YOU NEED PEOPLE TO BUY, if you are selling!
    This entire things is preposterous.

    • @tammyvibes87
      @tammyvibes87 14 днів тому +5

      they think regular people are so dumb to not get that. Supply and demand right? Goes both ways.

    • @jrochest4642
      @jrochest4642 14 днів тому +18

      There will be people to buy, just not necessarily at a price that will make the investor happy.

    • @TAUNinja
      @TAUNinja 14 днів тому +15

      Blackrock and Vanguard

    • @huskavarnaband
      @huskavarnaband 14 днів тому +10

      BlackRock and vanguard.

    • @tedtan6449
      @tedtan6449 14 днів тому +2

      Blackrock Monopoly of course.
      WEF Blackrock sweeps all

  • @Sandeep14736
    @Sandeep14736 14 днів тому +7

    Right, Mortgage brokers and developers should guide the public policy in Canada ?…. Shut up

  • @user-kv4kp4co1r
    @user-kv4kp4co1r 14 днів тому +31

    The capital gains tax on every $100K was previously $26750, and now the government has raised it to $30094. While it’s not a significant hike, these individuals are reacting as if the ground beneath them is shifting. 🙄

    • @mr.uthamaputhiran9790
      @mr.uthamaputhiran9790 12 днів тому +8

      Lol yeah. Average rent went up 100% in last 8 years but god forbid if "investors" are taxed 4% more

    • @jameswatson2784
      @jameswatson2784 11 днів тому +7

      Who do you think pays that tax? The person investing or the renter? Fewer investors because of the tax, fewer rental units, do you think rents go down or up with fewer units? The renters pay. Jokes on you!

    • @noahd213
      @noahd213 11 днів тому +2

      ​@@jameswatson2784 rent availability goes down but housing availability should go up by the same amount. As a whole it shouldn't matter - the only thing that affects prices is total supply of housing vs total demand.

    • @jameswatson2784
      @jameswatson2784 10 днів тому +2

      @noahd213 Close. Supply to people buying will go up so in the short term housing prices will decrease for buyers. Renting or investment properties will have less supply so rents will go up. Long run it is indeterminant. Depends on elasticity of supply and demand. If investors leave likely a housing crash. Bad for homeowners with mortgages good for people looking to buy. Rents will find a new equilibrium at a higher cap rate to pay for the taxes. Government sucking more wealth out of the economy. Look at Greece and Italy for what happens in long run. Especially with deficit spending.

    • @babyjeero123
      @babyjeero123 10 днів тому

      @@jameswatson2784
      Good thing some people understand supply and demand

  • @ewaste8318
    @ewaste8318 14 днів тому +62

    For the last time, investors that buy property to rent that could be owner-occupied aren't "providing housing", they're SCALPING housing.

    • @JJJohnson441
      @JJJohnson441 14 днів тому +8

      lol. let me guess, you rent?

    • @Clamps-nn2pz
      @Clamps-nn2pz 14 днів тому

      lmao imagine if the didnt there would be great demand for refrigerator boxes.

    • @ewaste8318
      @ewaste8318 14 днів тому +5

      @@JJJohnson441 Let me guess, you're currently riding the tsunami of unearned wealth, aka. a homeowner?

    • @ewaste8318
      @ewaste8318 14 днів тому +1

      @@Clamps-nn2pz yes because all those houses would just stay empty, that makes sense.

    • @Clamps-nn2pz
      @Clamps-nn2pz 14 днів тому +3

      @@ewaste8318 Uh no i was responding to your comment. investors that buy property to rent that could be owner-occupied aren't "providing housing". So the investor sells a tenanted house into the supply deficit limits his capital gain and now the tenants all have an issue. How does that fix the issue? Not everyone can get a mortgage or want one so thats why there is a rental market

  • @futureproof.health
    @futureproof.health 14 днів тому +5

    You never know. People’s might demand housing be built, not for profit but to house people, it could happen agaib

  • @mrnice9922
    @mrnice9922 13 днів тому +2

    Small landlord’s will sell and large corporations will buy.
    They're too big for Ottawa to handle as that mean drying up the investments.

  • @JessT-vg7ib
    @JessT-vg7ib 15 днів тому +7

    It's all going according to plan.

  • @patrickcahill8544
    @patrickcahill8544 14 днів тому +3

    Get qualified on a 30 year amortization make your payments based on a 25 years amortization, most bank have the option to increase your payment by up to double monthly the additional payment goes directly to principal.

  • @zachweyrauch2988
    @zachweyrauch2988 15 днів тому +5

    Canadian here. Keep your money. It hasnt helped my nation.

    • @Japanese_king
      @Japanese_king 15 днів тому +1

      You must be loser one, with no assets or investments?

  • @stephenhartwick2468
    @stephenhartwick2468 14 днів тому +2

    Is there a possibility that the prices will go up to compensate for having to pay more tax. Often when the seller of a product has to pay the government more to sell a product the cost is passed on to the buyer .

  • @debbierolland4931
    @debbierolland4931 12 днів тому +7

    There is nothing that this government does which is well thought out!

  • @chrislaverick6413
    @chrislaverick6413 14 днів тому +3

    I mean most rich people have already left canada, there is little to no incentive to be rich in canada, you get penalized so badly, why would any stay?

  • @maxpayne7419
    @maxpayne7419 12 днів тому +3

    Do not take investment advice from a real estate agent!

  • @consciouscrypto3090
    @consciouscrypto3090 8 днів тому +1

    OMG, your country is nuts! I thought this was a US article at first, but then I heard 'raise from 50% to 66%' and was like, it's only 20%. So you already have it at 50%? Madness.

  • @Headinavise
    @Headinavise 13 днів тому +1

    I am renting out a town house and I just saw 2 other units in the same area get listed. That's 2 less rentals available.

  • @10oner
    @10oner 13 днів тому +5

    I hope everyone finds a loophole to not pay these taxes

  • @SamSensei955
    @SamSensei955 14 днів тому +4

    Yes but most of us younger people don’t have houses to begin with and on a larger scale it would hurt that one guy from that London Ontario Graham Stephen video and hey man. 50+ units come online from that one guy. Sure. I’m all for it. Get these leech landlords and corporate landlords out of our pocket. And I’m surprised people are ok with cost of living as it is, when every ceo boasts how they can jack up rates because people are being told inflation is going to happen so they are going to take advantage of that and increase profits.

  • @lookanabeauti9386
    @lookanabeauti9386 14 днів тому +2

    Great news, more supply which may actually help stabilize prices.

  • @warrengaul2518
    @warrengaul2518 14 днів тому +1

    In Alberta the new home buyer's deposit is insured up to a specified amount. the builder takes the payment as a progress draw.

  • @robyndibblee8035
    @robyndibblee8035 14 днів тому +37

    No mention of average canadians being able to buy instead of investors. Why so much concern for investors and no mention of the benefits to family's and Middle class

    • @BluntsaggieTarot
      @BluntsaggieTarot 14 днів тому +5

      Because the middle class don't want to be landlords. What happens when your renter doesn't pay or you get a squatter? MIDDLE CLASS don't provide rentals for the lower class. That's the upper class that does that. If you're middle class doing that, you're going to struggle when you get one bad tenant (50% of them are bad and don't pay. Stop pretending renters are responsible. Many aren't)
      The middle class won't be buying apartment buildings and fourplexes to rent out lol
      That's why there is no mention. Middle class isn't major investors and can't afford to purchase the buildings and homes they invest in..
      The purpose of this change is to eliminate the private sector. The government wants to be in control of housing and rent. Socialism.....And the investors will leave and that will aid the housing crisis and the solution will be for the government to provide rent and housing because they are "honest" and "care" about us. But we have government funded housing complexes and they're trash

    • @geofflepper3207
      @geofflepper3207 13 днів тому +5

      ​@@BluntsaggieTarot
      You claim that 50% of the renters in Canada don't pay their rent and are living rent free?
      That's a completely ludicrous claim.
      And you think that expecting wealthy investors to pay a fraction of the tax rate that regular people pay on their investments is "socialism"?
      Lol. Lol.
      And you have the delusion that the federal and provincial governments want to build and run all rental housing in the country?
      Lol.
      In fact there is virtually no sign that they want to build and run any rental housing buildings.
      You're not making yourself look good.
      Do better.

    • @marcjolin8335
      @marcjolin8335 13 днів тому

      ask Trudeau

    • @Haxerous
      @Haxerous 13 днів тому

      Because it's Bloomberg and they only care about corporations, CEOs and the wealthy.

    • @rc-wj5ur
      @rc-wj5ur 13 днів тому +1

      @@geofflepper3207you are right they don’t want to build anything … and they should not … but they want to control it. They want to have a say how investors should run it when it’s the investors taking all the risk. Good luck with that.

  • @chronos1002
    @chronos1002 14 днів тому +2

    This interview sounds like a lot of "Fire and Brimstone" covered in "Snake Oil" to me.
    1. "I choose not to invest in Canada anymore" sounds like words from a foreign investor. To which I answer "So what ?" Canadians will happily invest in Canada. Also, most "savvy" investors also invest outside of their home country, even Canadian Investors. Again "So what ?".
    2. The Government LONG AGO stopped providing rental properties to most Canadians, and instead relied on the private sector to fill the need; as did most other countries. So your point is ????
    3. "Fewer places to live" ??? A sold "Rental Property" is still a place to live; it just being lived in by the actual owner, not a tenant who is paying part (if not all) of the actual owner's mortgage. Whether you own it, or rent it, you STILL live in it.
    4. If you have to sell the "family cottage", it is the estate of the parents (original owners) that must pay the "Capital Gains" tax upon their deaths. This is (or should be) known by any owner of recreational properties, and can be prepared for in advance. Alternatively, the "Capital Gains" can be paid from the sale of the Primary residence, or liquidation of any other assets the parents owned. So, "Yes, you will be affected", but this does NOT mean you will be presented with an unexpected "bill", but rather you may not "inherit" as much as you expect.
    5. "Selling the homes of Parents who have passed away", same as point 4.
    6. "Get my money out of the country, and invest elsewhere". Uh, as a Canadian citizen, you still have to pay taxes on "Foreign investments"; unless of course you are NOT a Canadian citizen, decide to renounce your Canadian Citizenship, or are a tax evader.
    7. Okay, you can keep all the money you make in a foreign country, so long as you don't bring it to Canada, and need to declare it. Countries with these kind of tax practices usually are either "Third World", or "Services for Profit". Are you saying that you plan to move to such places during your "Golden Years" when your health, and possibly your mental faculties, are starting to fail ? I think it more likely you'd rather stay in Canada, or move to the USA, in which case you need to declare. Either way, you screwed yourself.
    8. "My Principal Residence doesn't need to be Canada anymore", Yeah, but this decision has other consequences that you may like a whole lot less than paying a little more in Capital Gains taxes.
    9. "Deciding to just leave". Leaving a country doesn't just mean selling your home and crossing a border. It also means leaving a job, family, friends, and liquidating a lot of other assets. If you are "Free enough" to be able to do this, just because of "a 16% increase in Capital Gains Taxes, I doubt you are part of the "working population", and therefore don't contribute as much to the "Healthcare system".
    10. "30 Year Mortgages", any person who takes out a 30- year mortgage for a building that has yet to be built is either an Investor, or a fiscally irresponsible idiot. I think the government had "Occupant ready Single Family Homes" in mind, rather than "Pre-built Condos ill suited to families" when they wrote that paragraph. She is right though, that a 30 year mortgage holder will pay more interest than a 25-year holder; assuming that neither decides to pay off their mortgage earlier. This paragraph was "Government Window Dressing" regardless.
    11. "Use it or Loose It". I think the idea here was to discourage developers from applying for, and sitting on more permits than they can execute as a way of "excluding their competition". If one developer has all the permits, and even at max capacity can only complete 1 home per day, then there are only 365 homes built in a year, even if there is space for 10,000 homes. Better that 28 competing companies all get permits to build 365 homes each, and 10,000 homes get built.
    Labour issues are "not the government's nor the population of Canada's problem", It is the company's problem if their workers are unhappy, and you need to decide if angering your workforce and risking a strike is worth loosing the permits over.
    Interest rates are published, and I'm sure companies have the option to "return" any permits they receive if they decide the original building proposal is no longer "cost effective". I'm sure a competitor would be happy to have a crack at getting those permits if the original company doesn't want them. Also, the whole point is to "get homes built for Canadians", NOT "Maximize profits to line the pockets of Construction Company Executives and Investors". If interest rates and prices are "too high", well I say "That's life" AND "No Kidding, but interest rates and prices are high for ALL Canadians right now, so you are just one of many suffering". This is called project planning, and if you didn't factor this into your business plan, then "maybe this isn't the job for you".
    "Trust me, I'm sure if they "could build quickly they would want to ?", how about "No". As long as there is low supply and High demand, those companies will work to MAXIMISE their profits by keeping the supply low to maintain the value (and Profit) as high as possible.
    Rant over.
    Peace.

  • @Headinavise
    @Headinavise 13 днів тому +1

    I got laid off from ATCO. Rented my town house to save my mortgage. Now I will either have to pay a lot of tax when I sell or I will have to remove a renter and move back in. I was avoiding moving back in because with increasing mortgage rates and lay offs in Alberta. My new job is already showing signs of preparing for lay offs. So yes these things she is talking about affects more than the top 5% wealthy.
    The wealthy are never affected they have options.

  • @markstevens1729
    @markstevens1729 14 днів тому +1

    Let’s hope they all hit the market at the same time, tanking the prices and making long term rentals a little more affordable in the aftermath. This entitlement to twist the real estate market to your greed in cahoots with an American “sharing” economy is disgusting. Couldn’t be happier to see it “right sized.”

  • @rymoremorris5287
    @rymoremorris5287 14 днів тому +7

    This is so out of touch. We need far fewer foreign investors seeing our housing market as an opportunity.

    • @NeilB.-rv2ww
      @NeilB.-rv2ww 12 днів тому

      You are out of touch. Foreign investors are barred from purchasing residential real estate unless they are in process of becoming residents.

  • @tommcd8471
    @tommcd8471 14 днів тому +8

    All it is, is a gift to corporation like Black Rock....who the hell do you all think is going to buy these over priced homes? the first time home buyer? come on people stop living in delulu land.

  • @thejuice3819
    @thejuice3819 13 днів тому +1

    The development problem is less about labour shortages and more about developers wanting lower interest rates. Real estate shouldn’t be as big a part of the economy as it is, bubble needs to pop now. Let’s get back to oil, gas, mining, and producing shit please

  • @wondereagle
    @wondereagle 14 днів тому +14

    Nice Justin, let’s have fewer rentals, and 500,000 immigrants a year.

    • @user-kv4kp4co1r
      @user-kv4kp4co1r 14 днів тому

      Are those 500,000 folks staying rent free or the investors have made them modern day slaves?

    • @WizPigTactics
      @WizPigTactics 14 днів тому

      Well that's good for canadians then... Canadians are in a better position to buy property to live in than newly integrated immigrants.

    • @slammy333
      @slammy333 14 днів тому

      Would you prefer more rentals and fewer homeowners? Fewer rentals as a result of this means more canadians ACTUALLY LIVING IN THEIR HOMES. It's not like the houses are getting bulldozed when they're sold...

  • @jadefox7108
    @jadefox7108 15 днів тому +10

    I can only handle one disappointment per day, I'll look at it tomorrow...lol

  • @user-zx9hs7gx4i
    @user-zx9hs7gx4i 15 днів тому +6

    100 percent..... with the tax savings I will achieve by leaving Canada I can afford Platinum International HealthCare coverage for a fraction of the savings..... plus all the upside from tax-free income moving forward..... for me Canada has become a nice place to visit..... and that's it

  • @maxpayne7419
    @maxpayne7419 12 днів тому +1

    Homes should be for living in - not a speculative investment. For this reason, I think the government is doing the right thing in increasing the capital gains tax.

  • @user-jt7qo8do9g
    @user-jt7qo8do9g 14 днів тому +1

    Canadian dollar down, gold way up. No confidence in both Canada and the United States political policies.

  • @Richardcarlett
    @Richardcarlett 2 дні тому +4

    I’m a new dad, I moved to the Bay Area a few years ago and I’m thinking of purchasing a single family home, but with real estate prices currently through the roof, is it still a good idea to buy a home or should I invest in stocks for now and just wait for a housing market correction? I heard Nvidia and AMD are strong buys.

    • @robert-1miller
      @robert-1miller 2 дні тому +4

      it’s a personal decision, but according to Forbes, housing activities will remain stagnant for the most part of the year, so maybe hold off a little.

    • @Walter_hill_
      @Walter_hill_ 2 дні тому +3

      well you could put a downpayment on a home and as well diversify as much as you can into Ai and pharm. stocks like Pfizer and JnJ.

    • @donna_martins
      @donna_martins 2 дні тому +3

      Certain Ai companies are rumoured to be overvalued and might cause a market correction, I’d suggest you go with a managed portfolio, but even those don’t perform so well, so it’s best you reach out to a proper fiduciary to guide you, that’s what works for my spouse and I.

    • @ilyaveysman.
      @ilyaveysman. 2 дні тому +3

      this is all new to me, where do I find a fiduciary, can you recommend any?

    • @donna_martins
      @donna_martins 2 дні тому +3

      ’vivian jean wilhelm’’ is the licensed fiduciary I use. Just research the name. You’d find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment..

  • @ashishkothiyal6850
    @ashishkothiyal6850 14 днів тому +4

    Next thing is job losses in construction sector and rent increases. With investors missing from the market, the demand for housing will reduce and builders will not start new projects (construction job losses) leading to tighter supply (rent increases). More headaches for renters. The investors work as market makers.

  • @jrallen870
    @jrallen870 14 днів тому +2

    they should extend the deadline later into the year.... give people more time to sell these homes. That should have been the goal with this... put more homes into the hands of people that want to live in them.

  • @saveourplanet4204
    @saveourplanet4204 14 днів тому +1

    That was part of the reason this was done this way, with the extended timeline

  • @kirkin2006
    @kirkin2006 15 днів тому +3

    Continue pushing on rental control and u ll see this more and more and more.

    • @shauncameron8390
      @shauncameron8390 12 днів тому

      Rent control and tenants' rights working exactly as intended.

    • @kirkin2006
      @kirkin2006 10 днів тому

      @@shauncameron8390 I dont know what they r intended to do but you control the price of an asset and you ll lead to shortages and illegal markets. Even a school kid knows it.

  • @oshkoshbegone
    @oshkoshbegone 14 днів тому +15

    If Justin Trudeau even just consulted with UA-cam comments rather than his useless cabinet we would be better off.

    • @skaldlouiscyphre2453
      @skaldlouiscyphre2453 14 днів тому +3

      Won't somebody _pleeeease_ think of the poor housing scalpers?!

    • @klnrklnr4433
      @klnrklnr4433 12 днів тому

      lmao. consult with youtube nutters???🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @EcomCarl
    @EcomCarl 8 днів тому

    The update on Canada's capital gains tax is crucial for anyone involved in real estate investment! It's a good reminder to reassess investment strategies and possibly accelerate decisions before the June deadline 📆.

  • @MrCorcoran77
    @MrCorcoran77 14 днів тому +1

    It's almost like the idea is to get these investment firms to offload some of their realty investments..

  • @ronjcharity
    @ronjcharity 15 днів тому +4

    Hope to see a collapse in asset inflation.

    • @sparx6354
      @sparx6354 14 днів тому +1

      Hope to see more homeless people...

  • @Dstinct
    @Dstinct 15 днів тому +10

    Sounds like Canada needs to take a page from the US and make Canadian citizens declare all income, domestic and foreign.

  • @G11713
    @G11713 14 днів тому +1

    This doctor shortage is not all that visible in Toronto nor are these long wait times I've been hearing about. In any event, it is generally always cheaper to pool money and buy in bulk which is what taxes allows a society to do. It is also what private organizations for their investors as lobby groups for their members. In a society the investors are the citizens and their children's future.

  • @JohnDaniels
    @JohnDaniels 14 днів тому +1

    We are getting poorer precisely because a narrow elite has organized society for their own benefit at the expense of the vast mass of people. Political power has been narrowly concentrated, and has been used to create great wealth for those who possess it.

  • @InvernessFlorida2023
    @InvernessFlorida2023 15 днів тому +4

    She is spot on … people are going to take their money, investment and business to other countries

    • @kirkbrown3415
      @kirkbrown3415 15 днів тому +6

      great, more homes available for Canadians.

  • @maranorth
    @maranorth 13 днів тому +3

    Ppl are dismissing her comments and not understanding what she is saying
    - if you have a condo from when you got married (many couples) that you rent out to afford yr mortgage of yr house
    - if you do not have investments bc you are putting all yr money into yr current mortgage
    - if you do not have a pension bc you work for the private sector and so you kept the condo as yr “pension”
    ALL those folks will be nailed by this. It is not just 1%. That is a lie the Feds have said to make it about the “rich” and make it “us and them.” Actually, this is going to affect many different types of people. The corporations own blocks of real estate that they will never sell.

    • @Haxerous
      @Haxerous 13 днів тому +1

      Your primary home isn't gonna come under this new tax. So it doesn't really affect as many people in the way you might expect

  • @thelocustemperor
    @thelocustemperor 10 днів тому

    THANKYOU DAVELLE!! FINALLY SOMEONE WITH SOME COMMON SENSE ON OVERSEAS INVESTING!!

  • @rw6836
    @rw6836 11 днів тому

    If lots of rental units are sold off, that could result in fewer places to rent, but it would also mean lots of places for people to buy to live in, which balances out. It's good that landlords/investors are nudged to sell. It'd make for maybe cheaper homes for people to buy? I don't care if investors "invest" elsewhere, if it means way less demand.
    I'm a homeowner, so it's not in my interest for home prices to go down, but I feel Canada's housing market could use a bit of deflating, for long-term benefit to Canadians and future generations.

  • @ericwhistlecroft2960
    @ericwhistlecroft2960 14 днів тому +11

    This lady is SPOT on. Those with the means to will not tolerate this government any longer

  • @mariadavis3797
    @mariadavis3797 14 днів тому +5

    I’m selling and moving out. The next move will be taxing the principal residence.

  • @freecloudfish
    @freecloudfish 14 днів тому +1

    you still need to report foreign assets over CDN $100,000 - just not immediately with capital gains

  • @amandal3529
    @amandal3529 14 днів тому +1

    So rich people quit buying rental properties is a bad thing for average Canadians? How?

    • @gk6199
      @gk6199 14 днів тому +1

      We need to start making money on other things then RE. They should of made it where the capital gain tax was only for RE instead of other investors. It would of made other investments more attractive. I heard they are linking your CRA income to mortgage approvals at banks(this is huge). I have a couple revenue properties and would like to see a big correction(so our kids and kids friends can buy/without being sqeezed). My only concern is everything this government touches turns to sh@t and will probably do the opposite.

  • @angelasoWA
    @angelasoWA 14 днів тому +2

    Wow what a crazy tax grab! Such government overreach.

  • @jeffotoole4509
    @jeffotoole4509 14 днів тому +16

    Boo frickin hoo!! Landlords have to sell some of their prized real estate. The regular person doesn’t have a chance to buy a property and we care about these a holes. What a joke.

    • @stephenmorris8557
      @stephenmorris8557 14 днів тому +3

      You have anger control problems.

    • @windsofchangehome274
      @windsofchangehome274 14 днів тому +1

      You sound like a lifer renter. Bitter

    • @jeffotoole4509
      @jeffotoole4509 14 днів тому

      @@stephenmorris8557 I really don’t. My anger management course said I don’t.
      More important when does the flood of listings come on?

  • @Don-ex5ih
    @Don-ex5ih 15 днів тому +1

    So what’s happening after the month of June? Is the housing market collapsing or not?

  • @gettingthebalanceright
    @gettingthebalanceright 13 днів тому +2

    Boohoo rich people and unnecessary real estate agents

  • @brandonbriannarosenthal1059
    @brandonbriannarosenthal1059 15 днів тому +41

    This hurts all the Canadians who took risks and sacrificed to get where they are now. The government is taxing the shit out of all of us instead of focusing on growing the economy.

    • @jadefox7108
      @jadefox7108 15 днів тому +4

      Exactly!

    • @tonyfulford3175
      @tonyfulford3175 15 днів тому +1

      That's just the point ! Justin and the WEF under Klaus Schwab DON'T want to grow the economy. Their reasoning is, that WESTERN economies have grown enough and they WANT them to STOP growing because they are using too much resources. Hence all of these programs to CRIPPLE any type of growth. First they kill the Oil and Gas sector. Surprise, surprise you CAN'T have an economy without ENERGY. The excuse they use is "Climate change" which is completely made up and false, except tons of people have swallowed this nonsense hook, line and sinker. Why is Bill Gates buying up VAST amounts of farmland ? Surprise, (they only want to take it out of production). Less food, drives prices up and creates artificial shortages. Equals starving masses. You do realize they want to kill off at least 85% of the worlds population. This is NOT conspiracy theory but, if you take the time to connect the dots becomes simple FACT. Why are the governments of Europe trying their best to destroy family farms ? Funny, the farmers are fighting back, and winning. George Soros is NOT a GOD, he just thinks he is.

    • @m.r.a7992
      @m.r.a7992 15 днів тому +3

      Did you see the gas price this morning 😑😑

    • @24allix
      @24allix 15 днів тому +4

      "growing the economy" is a fancy way of saying increasing inflation. You didn't do shit to get to where you are today risking daddy's money.

    • @davidhughes6048
      @davidhughes6048 15 днів тому +4

      @@24allixsounds like daddy issues.

  • @Buddynotok
    @Buddynotok 15 днів тому +4

    Anything that’s bad for real estate investors is good by me

    • @tammyvibes87
      @tammyvibes87 14 днів тому

      @@nigel6956 no time like the present. They sell now, business as usual. They will be able to do everything they planned to do. Maybe less rental stock for a couple of years, but definitely more stock for first time buyers. I see it as a win-win between now and the end of June.

    • @canuckasaurus
      @canuckasaurus 14 днів тому +1

      @@nigel6956 You don't pay capital gains on your principal residence, so grandpa will be fine.

    • @gk6199
      @gk6199 14 днів тому

      Not yet.The way the Liberals spend it's coming

  • @VT-zz3ik
    @VT-zz3ik 23 години тому

    I'm not a tax expert and I hate the current tax system which is a criminal organization charging taxes over criminal rates. But, what she said about tax haven countries, aren't all Canadians taxed worldwide income assets?

  • @namkebanyanklariti
    @namkebanyanklariti 14 днів тому

    Very informative. Very knowledgeable subject matter expert Val Morrison! So fluid and articulate no uh...um...

  • @orbitx5838
    @orbitx5838 15 днів тому +7

    a big problem is Canada has a PM and a MInister of Finance with no qualifications in economics and obviously isn't seeking qualified guidance.

    • @Cutlerypotato
      @Cutlerypotato 15 днів тому +1

      It's okay she read a book about MMT

    • @davidhughes6048
      @davidhughes6048 15 днів тому +1

      She has a degree in Slavic studies, what are you on about? She is perfectly qualified to talk about Slavic history.

    • @kaceychapman
      @kaceychapman 15 днів тому +1

      The hair will balance itself

    • @orbitx5838
      @orbitx5838 15 днів тому

      @@Cutlerypotato She did do a TED Talk one time. The topic was along the lines of "Wealth Equality". It's concerning that our Minister of Finance is a socialist.

    • @Cutlerypotato
      @Cutlerypotato 15 днів тому +1

      @@orbitx5838 she must have been twitching up a storm

  • @paulh2468
    @paulh2468 14 днів тому +4

    This lady is full of crap. Many Canadians are not suddenly going to invest offshore. That has its own set of problems, and is already being done by the super rich these new taxes are targeting. A lot of countries are less politically stable, which is why Canada will always attract foreign investment. Do you really want to live in Portugal for the rest of your life, cut off from family and friends? And English isn’t always spoken.

  • @karinabrampt1556
    @karinabrampt1556 9 днів тому

    The straw that broke the camel's back. It is happening everywhere, Canada, US, Australia (where I am from). My late mother's property sold, but I never knew that the real estate agent had prior knowledge that the property would not sell for what I signed for. AUD$420K less than what I signed for. I am renting in a Retirement village, because the rent is low. It has taken away any plans I could have made. Yet, I have a roof over my head, and given the situation around the world in regards to rental properties, I'm much better off than many.

  • @user-oz4nn3jw8p
    @user-oz4nn3jw8p 14 днів тому +2

    Yes,offshore your investment.🤭

  • @user-qx9rd9to4q
    @user-qx9rd9to4q 14 днів тому +3

    As an astute person recently said 'go woke, go broke.'

  • @ryuuguu01
    @ryuuguu01 14 днів тому +4

    If someone has capital gains of significantly over $250 on a "cottage" I don't have a problem with them paying tax on 30% more of those gains.

    • @jefftee7354
      @jefftee7354 14 днів тому

      Seriously. How was that a real argument?
      That lady could not be any more tone-deaf. She lives in some sort of upper class echo chamber.

    • @Yannick3585
      @Yannick3585 14 днів тому

      If own by a couple that gain would be split? So 250k each?

  • @trishtaylor9813
    @trishtaylor9813 14 днів тому +1

    I have to say, I would like to see more Canadian's owning Canadian housing markets... so they'll sell and leave; we don't need outside investors at the rates we're paying.

  • @rupasandhu6061
    @rupasandhu6061 14 днів тому +1

    You can't avoid tax by just investing in other countries, unless you change your residency. Basically you have to move to avoid this tax.

    • @lionheart7431
      @lionheart7431 14 днів тому

      What if they don't know what you have in other countries 🤔