The Austro-Prussian War - Explained in 11 Minutes

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 сер 2024
  • The Austro-Prussian War - Explained in 11 Minutes
    Europe has always been home to conflicts and power struggles across the map. For a continent so big and intertwined, and with frequently shifting borders all throughout history, it’s no surprise that war would often become inevitable.
    In the case of Central Europe, as the second half of the 19th century came around, the clash for dominance and consolidated power over the region would be between the mighty Austrian Empire and the rising state of Prussia…
    The Kingdom of Prussia, at this time, was part of the German Confederation and was becoming the most powerful and influential of the incorporated states next to the Austrian Empire. Its leaders were the Hohenzollern family and in particular, King Wilhelm I alongside Prime Minister Otto von Bismarck.
    ♦Consider to Support the Channel of Patreon and gain cool stuff:
    / knowledgia
    ♦Please consider to SUBSCRIBE : goo.gl/YJNqek
    ♦Music by Epidemic Sound
    ♦Sources :
    The Kaiser and His Times (Norton Library (Paperback))
    by Michael Balfour: amzn.to/3dj14LO
    The Austro-Prussian War: Austria's War with Prussia and Italy in 1866
    by Cambridge University Press: amzn.to/3djbH17
    The Road to Königgrätz: Helmuth von Moltke and the Austro-Prussian War 1866 by Helion and Company : amzn.to/3xX08Vh
    www.britannica...
    schoolhistory....
    ♦Script & Research :
    Skylar Gordon
    #History #Documentary #Prussia

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @Knowledgia
    @Knowledgia  3 роки тому +560

    Some extra Information: For centuries Austria was considered the leader of the German states and the Habsburg Family controlled the Emperorship of the Formal Holy Roman Empire.
    Another German state, Prussia became increasingly powerful and by the late 18th century was ranked as one of the great powers of Europe and started to contest Austria's supremacy in Germany.
    As nationalism increased in Europe, a powerful aim of most German nationalists was the gathering of all Germans under one state.
    Some possibilities existed. One including Austria, and one excluding Austria.
    The Prussian Prime Minister, Otto Von Bismarck opted to not impose harsh terms against the Austrian Empire, so they can become allies in the future. After the German Unification there will still be rivalry between Germany and Austria, but they were allies in World War 1.
    There were also other major battles that we didn’t cover in this video and also the Italian participation was very important. To not make this video very long we tried to focus on the major events and on the most important battle of the war.

  • @Z.E.O.25
    @Z.E.O.25 3 роки тому +1408

    a couple decades later:
    Bismarck: I'm going to jump
    Kaiser Wilhelm II: Do a flip!

    • @tylermech66
      @tylermech66 3 роки тому +29

      Damnit Billy respect your elders!

    • @Barwasser
      @Barwasser 3 роки тому +51

      a couple decades later:
      Kaiser Wilhelm II: I'll do a flip - look mom, no hands!
      *directed by robert b weide

    • @tenid4824
      @tenid4824 3 роки тому

      so true, hahaz!!

    • @user-qd3lc7zb6n
      @user-qd3lc7zb6n 3 роки тому

      Most important part of history

    • @aredpandahREAL
      @aredpandahREAL 3 роки тому

      That Bismarck guy is incompetent lol

  • @Barwasser
    @Barwasser 3 роки тому +1529

    Bismark really knew how to make peace. Sometimes this is just as important as knowing how to win wars.

    • @axelpatrickb.pingol3228
      @axelpatrickb.pingol3228 3 роки тому +56

      Know when to hold, know when to fold, said Kenny Rogers...

    • @emamag6455
      @emamag6455 3 роки тому +116

      Indeed, if the French had not imposed such harsh terms to Germany at the end of the ww1 probably there wouldn't be a ww2.

    • @actin9294
      @actin9294 3 роки тому +43

      @@emamag6455 the terms were too lenient mate. Germans imposed much harsher terms on their crushed enemies and nobody talks about it.

    • @ItsClout_
      @ItsClout_ 3 роки тому +15

      @@actin9294 anyways

    • @actin9294
      @actin9294 3 роки тому +4

      @@ItsClout_ what

  • @DisgruntledHippo
    @DisgruntledHippo 3 роки тому +657

    A good book that covers this topic is "The Pursuit of Power. Europe 1815-1914."

    • @shweli4326
      @shweli4326 3 роки тому +5

      That book is some beautiful literature

    • @commentbellow8185
      @commentbellow8185 3 роки тому +14

      Thanks for this suggestion. I will look it up.
      People say social media is all bad but I have learned a lot.

    • @DisgruntledHippo
      @DisgruntledHippo 3 роки тому +16

      @@commentbellow8185 Anytime! That's one of the reasons why I love these channels. It's great opportunity to give book recommendations on the subject if someone would like to take a more in depth look at the topic.

    • @VenomousSpyro
      @VenomousSpyro 3 роки тому +7

      @@commentbellow8185 Social Media for the most part is bad. But the history community is pretty good. And the history community is almost exclusively to the right Politically. So we avoid all the Leftist Crap that plagues social media.

    • @DisgruntledHippo
      @DisgruntledHippo 3 роки тому +1

      @@VenomousSpyro lol

  • @edwinsparda7622
    @edwinsparda7622 3 роки тому +1761

    Austria ruled German states for centuries.
    Austria today: we're not German.

    • @Getcakedieyoung23
      @Getcakedieyoung23 3 роки тому +185

      After WW2 they didn’t want to be german anymore 😂🙈

    • @xenotypos
      @xenotypos 3 роки тому +371

      It's because there's always that confusion between German and Germanic, when Austrians say they aren't German it's just a matter of nationality, they just want to distinguish themselves from German citizens.
      They aren't denying they are Germanic.

    • @internet5076
      @internet5076 3 роки тому +44

      @@xenotypos Nowadays Deutsch means of German nationality but especially before WW2 I feel like it meant Germanic.

    • @florl5350
      @florl5350 3 роки тому +50

      @@amirudinadnan7024 You miss the Anschluss. Are you serious? And yeah, we don’t consider ourself german because we have another culture, history and dialect as Germany, even though everyone knows that we are ethnically german. But even when we would be part of Germany like Bavaria, most of us would feel more like an Austrian. Many bavarians don’t feel german and many germans don’t feel like it belongs to Germany. What I wanna say is that the „Entnazifizierung“ was an extremely important thing, but we would still feel Austrian without it

    • @trollinape2697
      @trollinape2697 3 роки тому +61

      @@xenotypos germanic =/= german. Germanics also a counts for scandinavia netherlands etc, austrians felt they were ethnically german and nowadays an austrian would get annoyed if you called them german

  • @MrAsullivan12
    @MrAsullivan12 3 роки тому +551

    Bismarck was the greatest diplomat to ever live. The amount of foresight he had is astonishing

    • @thewingedone1172
      @thewingedone1172 3 роки тому +23

      Bismarck singlehandedly ensured that France will become Germany's enemy in next global conflict and Germany's expansion in his reign lead to eventual creation of Entente. He was only lucky to be kicked out by Wilhelm 2 before Germany faced consequences of his mistakes. German Empire's days were counted the day Rheinland was annexed

    • @MrAsullivan12
      @MrAsullivan12 3 роки тому +98

      @@thewingedone1172 not exactly. Bismarck always made sure to keep russia as an ally to prevent russia becoming an enemy. But wilhelm 2 decided he knew better than bismarck and the rest is history

    • @costamcostam8961
      @costamcostam8961 3 роки тому +20

      And it was because of Wilhelm I that Germany took Alsace from France. Bismarck was aware that France will seek revenge after this. But to be fair, he wasn't protesting much against Wilhelm's idea. He as well wanted to weaken France.

    • @mosquitobight
      @mosquitobight 3 роки тому +20

      @@costamcostam8961 Bismarck should have persuaded Wilhelm to ask for some colonies instead. France probably would have given up West Africa rather than Alsace-Lorraine. If the colonies weren't profitable, they could always be sold.

    • @fkjl4717
      @fkjl4717 3 роки тому +7

      @@MrAsullivan12 this is not quite true. Bismarks diplomacy was different for different times. While German Empire was forming while it was just Prussia Bismark was seeking allies everywhere including Russia. After victory over France Bismark not needed Russia any more and signed alliance with Austro-Hungarian empire which had a quarrel with Russia over Balkans. Also at Berlin congress (1878) Bismark supported Austrian aims, not Russian and Bulgarian. Three emperors conference was just pocket sand into Russian eyes.
      Bismark also believed that it was important for Germany to weaken France and safe Austria stable. in 1866 Bismark refused military staff (Prussian) and Italian voices for pressing further into Austria and crush it, with possibility of creating the Grossdeutschland and freeing Trentino and Trieste for Italy. Also he refused any initiative to invade Austria again. So Germany anyway would at least take Metz-Strasbourg area from France and anyway become enemy with Russia.
      Also it would be fair to say that fortresses on Franco-German border were important for protection of Germany in future. If France saved control over all of them it would be a perfect stance for new Franco-German war. Bismarks late diplomacy was a pretext for WW1, even if Alsace was not taken it would only slow down creation of Entente.
      I believe WW1 could be successful for Germany only if Bismark did isolate Austria instead of supporting it.

  • @ondrejsatny5919
    @ondrejsatny5919 3 роки тому +421

    I live in north-east of Czech republic. Almost everywhere around you can see 1866 crosses. Under my small 5k town lies 50 000 soldiers. Just because Austrian general didn't listen to retreat command and sent his man in small groups against prussians. Horror.

    • @andreikier
      @andreikier 3 роки тому +4

      Do today's Czechs side with Austria?

    • @rajaamirul3208
      @rajaamirul3208 3 роки тому

      damn, that a lot of space for 5k town

    • @ondrejsatny5919
      @ondrejsatny5919 2 роки тому +13

      ​@@andreikier At that time , we were under austria, so czechs fought for them because we had to, we didn't want to. ( In WWI Czechs often ran to Russians and created legions.) I would say Czechs always hated Austrians/Germans but after 40 years of communism more people hate Russians. I think now it´s friendly, there is no reson to hate them now. if you´re asking about army- after WWII they signed Austrian State Treaty en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_State_Treaty so now they should be neutral.

    • @troelembiid6970
      @troelembiid6970 2 роки тому +23

      @@ondrejsatny5919 Many Czechs didn’t actually hate Austria. That is a myth that people believe about the Austrian empire. Many ethnicities did not believe in nationalism and actually embraced a unified country.

    • @pavel6688
      @pavel6688 2 роки тому

      @@andreikier What do you mean by "side"?:)

  • @HistoryOfRevolutions
    @HistoryOfRevolutions 3 роки тому +502

    "It's the desire to be barbaric that makes governments call their enemies barbarians"
    - Bertolt Brecht

    • @Threezi04
      @Threezi04 3 роки тому +1

      @@godlovesyou1995 How so?

    • @godlovesyou1995
      @godlovesyou1995 3 роки тому +1

      @@Threezi04 sorry, i misread the meaning/ tone of the words

    • @comradekenobi6908
      @comradekenobi6908 3 роки тому

      Based

    • @blubberwasser5105
      @blubberwasser5105 3 роки тому

      do you know the original version which is presumably in german?

    • @grandcrowdadforde6127
      @grandcrowdadforde6127 2 роки тому

      And! quote... Its not a crime robbing a bank; its a crime starting one !

  • @magmanek1508
    @magmanek1508 3 роки тому +294

    Although my country has been part of Austrian empire till the end of WW1 and we've learned about this, I still managed to learn a lot In almost 11 minutes.. Great video!

  • @HighPeakMapping
    @HighPeakMapping 3 роки тому +246

    Ah the brother's war. One to remember.

    • @andatwsk2810
      @andatwsk2810 3 роки тому +9

      One not to remember, atleast for me

    • @riccards
      @riccards 3 роки тому +4

      @@andatwsk2810 *shut german*

    • @sadiqahmed4143
      @sadiqahmed4143 3 роки тому +8

      @@andatwsk2810 Sir you have been found being involved in anti German things we hearby Arrest you and sentence you to reduction of size and loss of your Empire now go get cringed

    • @andatwsk2810
      @andatwsk2810 3 роки тому +3

      @@sadiqahmed4143 I will consider myself german only after the prussian are gone

    • @def3ndr887
      @def3ndr887 3 роки тому +1

      @@andatwsk2810 it’s a shame those pigs from Prussia United Germany instead of you

  • @Newdivide
    @Newdivide 3 роки тому +351

    One day the great European War will come out of some damned foolish thing in the Balkans.
    - Otto von Bismarck

    • @USSFFRU
      @USSFFRU 3 роки тому +32

      Did Bismarck really say that? If he did, then he predicted WW1

    • @primkup
      @primkup 3 роки тому +85

      ​@@USSFFRU Bismarck also said to kaiser Wilhelm II this: "Your majesty, so long as you have this present officer corps, you can do as you please. But when this is no longer the case, it will be very different for you. The crash will come 20 years after my departure if things go on like this."
      Bismarck died in 1898. 20 years later, German monarchy collapsed.

    • @USSFFRU
      @USSFFRU 3 роки тому +12

      @@primkup Bismarck was a great general, but knew the future, jeez.

    • @USSFFRU
      @USSFFRU 3 роки тому +6

      @Shadow Reptile it sucks no one would follow Bismarck's footsteps in the 1900s.

    • @primkup
      @primkup 3 роки тому +8

      @@USSFFRU Not general, politician. But yes, he was pretty good.

  • @none5349
    @none5349 3 роки тому +725

    Frederick The Great, the only German who defeated the world powers by himself.

    • @yes-tn2nk
      @yes-tn2nk 3 роки тому +46

      Laughing as a french

    • @mariano98ify
      @mariano98ify 3 роки тому +42

      He had the huge advantage of fighting at home. The supplies lines for the coalition armies and old communications tools were ineffective to coordinate big differetents armies.

    • @toonfranken5236
      @toonfranken5236 3 роки тому +17

      Lucky for him there wans’t a small angry Austrian guy who tried right?… right?

    • @LDW12887
      @LDW12887 3 роки тому +22

      >the world
      You know africans and asians are part of this "world" of yours, bigot

    • @joemamaobama6863
      @joemamaobama6863 3 роки тому +30

      lmao only cuz peter iii was a prussian fanboy

  • @vincenzochianese9378
    @vincenzochianese9378 3 роки тому +40

    Prussia : Italy what did you do in this war?
    Italy: that's the neat part, I didn't

    • @fkjl4717
      @fkjl4717 3 роки тому +5

      Interesting that Italy actually vowed Prussia to continue the war so they could take Trentino and Trieste. Bismark refused.

    • @macca154
      @macca154 2 роки тому +3

      LMFAO

    • @GenesisProgressive72
      @GenesisProgressive72 Рік тому

      Except it entered Trentino

  • @alexl9012
    @alexl9012 3 роки тому +19

    8:13 Bismarck being Bismarck

  • @blockmasterscott
    @blockmasterscott 3 роки тому +65

    God, it sounds like 2 brothers who could not get along in their adult years and always got into a fist fight at summer family picnics lol.

    • @blockmasterscott
      @blockmasterscott 3 роки тому

      @Safwaan I've actually seen that happen!

    • @blockmasterscott
      @blockmasterscott 3 роки тому

      @Safwaan yup. Two of my cousins who are brothers tried owning a house together with their wives. They got tired of each other, one moved out and left the other with the mortgage, and they’ve hated each other ever since lol.
      They’ll act nice until a family member has some sort of drama snd then the hatred cones up again.

  • @heliosapollyon4391
    @heliosapollyon4391 3 роки тому +101

    Prussia is such a kickass name for a country or maybe it's badass IDK

    • @Chalk_I
      @Chalk_I 3 роки тому +19

      yeah adding a P in Russia is pretty cool ngl

    • @crusader2112
      @crusader2112 3 роки тому +2

      😎👍

    • @mosquitobight
      @mosquitobight 3 роки тому +8

      Too bad they didn't add a C or a K, they could have been Krussia

    • @NicolaW72
      @NicolaW72 3 роки тому +13

      @@Chalk_I Prussia = Preußen in German originates from the Latin Borussia = nearby Russia. The name was originally used for the territory later known as "Eastern Prussia" with the capital of Königsberg. In 1701 the first Prussian King Friedrich I. took his crown as a King especially for this territory. The territory around Berlin was the Electorate of Brandenburg. Only after the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806 the name "Kingdom of Prussia" was used for the whole territory. So, yes, "Prussia" had to do with "Russia".

    • @comradekenobi6908
      @comradekenobi6908 3 роки тому +4

      P(lus) + Russia = Prussia

  • @ulrichhartmann4585
    @ulrichhartmann4585 3 роки тому +28

    The North German Confederation was no continuation of the German Confederation. It was not a loose assembly of independent states but a unified federal state. (And it did not contain Luxembourg and the Dutch province of Limburg.) In fact, the later German empire was nothing else but an extended version of the North German Confederation.

  • @d.s.archer5903
    @d.s.archer5903 3 роки тому +49

    The Battle of Königgrätz (Sadowa), 3 July 1866, is especially interesting because it culminates in a situation we have seen throughout military history: last-minute reinforcements arriving and turning the tide of battle. A few examples are Towton (1461), Marengo (1800), Waterloo (1815), Antietam (1862), and The Wilderness (1864).

    • @RagingGoblin
      @RagingGoblin Рік тому +4

      @Mr Storni Agreed. I really hate the (predominantly British-American) fixation on Waterloo.
      Napoleon was beaten at Leipzig by Russians, Prussians, Swedes and Austrians.
      Pretending that Britain came in to save Europe doesn't really make it true.

  • @compatriot852
    @compatriot852 3 роки тому +55

    Imagine a world where Austria unified Germany. I wonder how that would change the world

    • @thunderbird1921
      @thunderbird1921 3 роки тому +20

      Actually, from what I've read, Austria (or at least their allies) didn't exactly want a fully unified Germany, but either to preserve the German Confederation or go to a system somewhat like the former Holy Roman Empire. There was very little if any chance non-German peoples would be wanted in a truly unified German state, and Franz Joseph was determined to hold onto Hungary, the Czechs and some of the Balkans. Prussia was determined to go full unified German state, and thus this war became inevitable. The video sadly left out some CRUCIAL details. The "German Question" honestly reminds me some of America's struggle (strong centralized nation or loose union of states).

    • @fkjl4717
      @fkjl4717 3 роки тому +8

      I dont think it would exist. Austria was interested in dominating over German cities but not in unifying them. If Prussia lost this war than what? I believe local nationalism would evolve also concerns about self-defence would grow for German states, so some smaller states would unify creating more big states like Bavaria and Prussia. Maybe France would make real project of South Germany (Baden and Wurtemberg united with Bavaria). So Germany would be split between North German state(under Prussia) and South Germany(under Bavaria).
      Without Prussia as unifier Germany would never unite.
      BTW there are also was religious difference Austria and especially royal court was deeply catholic while in German states protestantism was strong even in Bavaria were areas with domination of protestantism.

    • @MrSiddharthaSaha
      @MrSiddharthaSaha 2 роки тому +1

      Read the holy Roman Empire by a Chinese historian author. It is an historical self insert into Emperor Franz in his effort to recreate the hre.

    • @starcityrc3298
      @starcityrc3298 2 роки тому +8

      Well a certain guy with a mustache from Austria did Unify Germany lol

  • @yourlocalt72
    @yourlocalt72 3 роки тому +54

    *Loads up Victoria 2*
    Ah shit here we go again

    • @uolboi5028
      @uolboi5028 3 роки тому +1

      Play eu4 then Vic 2 so good same with ck

    • @alexanderraz.
      @alexanderraz. 3 роки тому +1

      What your récord of forming Germany?

    • @yourlocalt72
      @yourlocalt72 3 роки тому +1

      @@uolboi5028 i have almost 3k hours on eu4

    • @yourlocalt72
      @yourlocalt72 3 роки тому +1

      @@alexanderraz. late 1860s im not that good at the game

    • @sauronmordor7494
      @sauronmordor7494 3 роки тому

      @@yourlocalt72 ja

  • @young.angry.devildawg
    @young.angry.devildawg 3 роки тому +143

    it’s funny how these 3 nations would become allies less than 100 years later

    • @terrypennington2519
      @terrypennington2519 3 роки тому +49

      2. Italy didn't stay allied to them for long. And then 25 years later, Italy would again not stayed allied for very long. xD

    • @ilimes
      @ilimes 3 роки тому +9

      @i-mm-o res everyone lost

    • @terrypennington2519
      @terrypennington2519 3 роки тому +17

      @i-mm-o res Austria has no reason for an army. They literally have no rivals, and none outside of Europe having any reason to rival them. Germany has NATO and works jointly with the US, as well as having a massive influence on the EU and becoming the most economically rich country in Europe. And no, Germany isn't weak, it has the 10th strongest military in the world.
      Not having much of a say in international affairs doesn't mean the countries are irrelevant, sure that means they don't call the big shots anymore, but they do work in close partnership with those that do, and have other ways of influencing the world. Plus, not having to put a massive focus on military means they can focus on cultural, economical, and technological development. A country can still be great, regardless of international relevancy or not.

    • @purpleteaisme
      @purpleteaisme 3 роки тому

      @@terrypennington2519 You clearly misunderstood what he said, please reread it more clearly now.
      Also, Austria do have a military.

    • @terrypennington2519
      @terrypennington2519 3 роки тому +4

      @@purpleteaisme "Austria has no army, Germany a week one. USA,UK,France,Russia and China lately have the last say in critical international affairs and negotiations. Austria is almost irrelevant internationally... These are the cruel rules, the winners take it all."
      I'm to believe I read it and understood it perfectly, and replied accordingly. What is it here that I am not understanding?

  • @cwalumgutair5602
    @cwalumgutair5602 3 роки тому +9

    The video is finally here, thank you knowledgia

  • @elliotbrown1076
    @elliotbrown1076 3 роки тому +11

    Holy moly what a good episode

  • @d.s.archer5903
    @d.s.archer5903 3 роки тому +26

    8:15 Anyone interested in this era needs to check out “The Fall of Eagles”, a 13-part BBC drama from 1974. Episode 2, “The English Princess", deals with von Bismarck (Curd Jürgens) and the building of the German Empire, and includes the scene describe here where von Bismarck threatens to jump out of a window!

  • @HingerlAlois
    @HingerlAlois 3 роки тому +66

    First and foremost Prussia profited from the peace deals of Bismarck in 1870 when France declared war on Prussia.
    Austria stayed out of the war between France and Prussia.
    The southern German states (Bavaria, Baden, Württemberg, Hesse) were obliged to join Prussia against France as they had to sign defensive treaties with Prussia at the end of the Austro-Prussian War. This added a significant number of troops to the soldiers mobilized by Prussia and its allies of the North German confederation.
    Bavaria alone deployed around 100.000 soldiers for the war against France.

    • @josecano9210
      @josecano9210 2 роки тому +8

      The Austrians wanted to join the Franco-Prussian war on the side of the French for payback against Prussia but by that time Austria became Austria-Hungary and the Hungarians wanted no part in the war so what the Austrians wanted got canceled out

    • @RagingGoblin
      @RagingGoblin Рік тому +2

      Actually, Baden was pretty pro-Prussia, certainly compared to their southern neighbour-states.
      In the Austro-Prussian war, Baden's army was very intentionally blundering about and retreating from Prussia ... even as their southern comrades fought a relatively equal battle.
      Baden was particularly affected by the revolutionary waves of the mid-19th century. And Prussia helped them put the revolutionaries down.

  • @raphlvlogs271
    @raphlvlogs271 3 роки тому +31

    Germany was eventually unified because of continuously winning wars.

    • @godlovesyou1995
      @godlovesyou1995 3 роки тому +2

      It didnt really unify, prussia conquered it all

    • @freikorps9661
      @freikorps9661 3 роки тому +3

      @@godlovesyou1995 No. The German National Spirit was Born with the wars against denmark, Austria and especially france.

    • @mosquitobight
      @mosquitobight 3 роки тому +1

      @@freikorps9661 The idea of nationalism was introduced to Germany, Italy and almost everywhere else by France during the Napoleonic Wars. Before that, everybody was a subject of "Graf von Schwarzberg" or whoever.

    • @NicolaW72
      @NicolaW72 3 роки тому

      Sorry, no. The decision of 1866 was that Austria wouldn´t be part of a future Germany, not more or less.

    • @lordyaromir6407
      @lordyaromir6407 3 роки тому +1

      @@NicolaW72 Yes, but that was much more important than people give it credit for. Kicking Austria out of the Germany meant, that Prussia will be the leading power of newly unified Germany and it will impose it's will on rest of the German countries. That's why the 2nd Reich was pretty much glorified Prussia.

  • @NIKOLASAV1
    @NIKOLASAV1 3 роки тому +51

    Needle gun was the invention that tipped the balance of power.

  • @abrahamlincoln8037
    @abrahamlincoln8037 3 роки тому +34

    Amazing History... Thanks!

  • @user_____M
    @user_____M 3 роки тому +35

    >for a continent so big
    >literally the smallest besides Australia (but yeah, it's big from a personal perspective regardless)

    • @Knowledgia
      @Knowledgia  3 роки тому +6

      for a continent so big that had constant fights and wars in almost every region of it for centuries. I think we should have formulated it differently lol. Thanks for watching!

    • @haroldinho9930
      @haroldinho9930 3 роки тому +1

      It’s literally the biggest continent. The Americas are the second biggest, Antarctica is the third biggest, and Australia is the smallest.

    • @raptordoniv6779
      @raptordoniv6779 3 роки тому +2

      @rahul Dio yes it is

    • @user_____M
      @user_____M 3 роки тому +2

      @rahul Dio did you just asume its gender?

    • @darthplagueis13
      @darthplagueis13 3 роки тому +2

      That's kind of a difficult topic. The thing is, what would traditionally be considered europe would be a fairly small continent, but on the other hand, europe geographically speaking isn't an independent continent. Eurasia is. And eurasia is the biggest of the bunch, so depending on the definitions and semantics, europe is both the smallest and the biggest continent.

  • @yar3130
    @yar3130 2 роки тому +10

    While the territory of Saxony was indeed occupied by Prussia, the whole Saxon Army linked up with the Austrian Army of the North and fought in almost every battle in the Bohemian theatre. I believe this could be called real support.

  • @abaddon7558
    @abaddon7558 3 роки тому +5

    Very nice video, never heard of that conflict, now we need the follow up war, the war of 1870 between Franc, Prussia an its allies, that led to the Germany unification.

  • @memazov6601
    @memazov6601 3 роки тому +34

    This what I call the Austrian High Command in a Nutshell

  • @TonySlug
    @TonySlug 2 роки тому +22

    Since Austria didn't become part of a unified Germany due to animosity / rivalry with Prussia, it is somewhat understandable that a pan-German like Austrian politician A.H. wished to correct what he viewed as a "historical error" by annexing Austria during the "Anschluss". Furthermore it's odd / interesting to see several fairly large isolated Prussian enclaves spread across what is now Germany, including a pretty big one along the Eastern border of the Netherlands (Where I live). My dad told me that when he was young, elderly Dutch people would still refer to Germans across the border as "the Prussians", not Germans.

    • @tomitiustritus6672
      @tomitiustritus6672 2 роки тому

      Austria didn't want to be part of a german national state, because Austria was an empire and would have had to give up their non-german holdings, most prominently the entirety of Hungary by such a move. Also the conflict over which of the two would rule a german national state was basically decided here. Austria lost that to Prussia and would never join unter prussian rule. It would have been just as that vice versa if the Austrians had won.

    • @MarcDufresneosorusrex
      @MarcDufresneosorusrex 2 роки тому +2

      @@tomitiustritus6672 ruled by different royal houses; I think Prussian royal home was HoheStaufen, Austria's was based (not Hohestaufen)?

    • @tomitiustritus6672
      @tomitiustritus6672 2 роки тому

      @@MarcDufresneosorusrex Hohenzollern (Prussia)vs. Habsburg(Austria-Hungary, Portugal, Spain, Lorraine...)
      The Staufer (Hohenstaufen) were medieval holy roman emperrors (Friedrich Barbarossa etc.). But Nobility gets extremely convoluted extremely quickly.
      Edit: The Austrian Habsburgs Problem was, that Germany wanted to unite under a national State, guided by the idea of nationalism. The Habsburgs were still pretty spread out, across different holdings that were now understood as different nations. Hungary or the Balkans would not have been part of a german national state, but that was more than half of the Austro-Hungarian state. A german national state under prussian supremacy would be unthinkable for that reason. And of course for the reason that the Habsburgs were a multinational house that between them ruled half of Europe(Spain, Portugal, at times Belgium i think and so on). The biggest and mightiest and highest(in their eyes) Noble house and dynasty would never accept a comparatively local house like the Hohenzollern to rule over a Habsburg regent. That was also unacceptable.

    • @MarcDufresneosorusrex
      @MarcDufresneosorusrex 2 роки тому +2

      @@tomitiustritus6672 thank you for this; i like to come back to my youtube comments for quick info : )

    • @actin9294
      @actin9294 2 роки тому +1

      That big enclave bordering the Netherlands was called The Rhineland and was arguably the biggest asset of Prussia - it is rich in natural resources and heavily industrialised. Even today most of Germany's industry is concentrated there.

  • @Diamond-vy1lx
    @Diamond-vy1lx 3 роки тому +7

    Exam week next week
    I wish it was from this...

  • @christianrode8846
    @christianrode8846 2 роки тому +20

    I am a German of Prussian descent and I am proud of it.

    • @davidson3658
      @davidson3658 2 роки тому +2

      Im Czech from Konigratz 😊

    • @ocold-gp3oi
      @ocold-gp3oi 3 місяці тому

      Don't be, it's people like you who caused multitudes of unnecessary suffering in two world wars

    •  2 місяці тому

      @@davidson3658 I am rolf from dusseldorf

  • @abrahamlincoln8037
    @abrahamlincoln8037 3 роки тому +26

    Man this should be my social's teacher...

  • @firmanimad
    @firmanimad 3 роки тому +7

    Prussia actually did not demand much land from Austria since their war goal was to take their sphere instead

  • @michaelbuchinger6191
    @michaelbuchinger6191 3 роки тому +43

    You forgot that Austria defeated Italy in the naval-battle of Lissa and the battle of Custozza

    • @etetepete
      @etetepete 3 роки тому +16

      Defeating Italians was never more than a side hustle for Austria. Even in WW1 when both their hands where tied in the balkans and Russia, Austria managed to defeat Italian offensives, while being heavily outnumbered. Austria also had the upper hand in the naval controll over the adriatic. Imagine that, Austria being a noteworthy naval-power. LOL

    • @TheAustrianAnimations87
      @TheAustrianAnimations87 3 роки тому +10

      @@etetepete Italy also had French & British naval support (while Austria had small German naval support), yet the European Entente Powers even needed American & Commonwealth support to finally defeat the Austrian navy (which was outnumbered & had fuel disadvantages but still was on the upper hand until the last war months) in 1918. At the Otranto Battle in 1917, much bigger Anglo-Franco-Italian fleets lost several ships to the vastly outnumbered Austrians. And aside from the battle of Lissa, the Austrian navy also played a role in the 2nd Ottoman-Egyptian War under Archduke Friedrich - defeating the Egyptian forces. So yeah, Austria was actually an effective naval power until 1918.

    • @vincenzochianese9378
      @vincenzochianese9378 3 роки тому +10

      @@etetepete And then Austria got crushed by Italy

    • @etetepete
      @etetepete 3 роки тому +10

      @@vincenzochianese9378 Never by Italy, by Germany in the backstab of the "third Italian independence war" and by France and Britain in the great war, even though your ancestors backstabbed us there aswell. But hey, just give us back Südtirol, you can keep Trentino, and we're done with that story. Ciao!

    • @lucmanzoni6265
      @lucmanzoni6265 3 роки тому +2

      @@etetepete Second Battle of the Piave River: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Battle_of_the_Piave_River

  • @colindaniels945
    @colindaniels945 2 місяці тому +1

    You can imagine the reaction in France when they got Venice from Austria:
    French official: "Sire,did we order a Venice?"
    Napoleon III: " No,we ordered a Belgium and a Luxembourg, but no Venice."
    French official: "What should we do with it?"
    Napoleon III: "Give it to Italy, they need it to complete the set."

  • @neroclaudius7284
    @neroclaudius7284 3 роки тому +2

    Kings and Generals has an excellent video that focuses more on the battle of Königgratz. It is a good video to watch after this.

  • @michielderuyter176
    @michielderuyter176 3 роки тому +13

    I would rather call in the "Brothers War"

    • @sauronmordor7494
      @sauronmordor7494 3 роки тому

      👍

    • @paulgro7255
      @paulgro7255 3 роки тому +3

      In Germany it is known as the "Deutsche Krieg" the German war. No mention of Austria or Prussia.

  • @alessiodecarolis
    @alessiodecarolis 3 роки тому +48

    This war was the final nail on muzzle loaders' coffin, Austria's generals had refused to adopt a breech loading rifle for logistical motives (!), after this war there was an hurry of most HQ to adopt a breech loading rifle, also if some , swiss, brits and italians were on the way (British army had bought some thousands of Sharpe's carabines for their cavalry)

    • @alessiodecarolis
      @alessiodecarolis 3 роки тому +9

      @Абдульзефир Yes, but the french before the war of 1870 adopted the Chassepot and the British first the Snyder system as stop gap, then the Martini Henry (Zulu's rifle) , in Italy f.e. the Vatican's army had the Remington Rolling block, employed succesfully against Garibaldi' s patriots at Mentana (1867)

    • @MarcDufresneosorusrex
      @MarcDufresneosorusrex 3 роки тому

      what's an example of breech loading rifle? is it American civil war ? was it used in conflict in Asia at all? thankyou very much

    • @MarcDufresneosorusrex
      @MarcDufresneosorusrex 3 роки тому

      @Абдульзефир okay spasibo thanks (oh gosh , can you imagine fighting with those? that's crazy

    • @alessiodecarolis
      @alessiodecarolis 3 роки тому +1

      @@MarcDufresneosorusrex The ACW was fought with muzzle loading muskets, but in the Union army some units, such as Berdan's Sharpshooters, had Sharpe breechloading rifles, some NG units also adopted breechloading ones or Spencer repeaters, at the end of the war all the Union cavalry had breechloading carabines or Spencer repeaters.

    • @MarcDufresneosorusrex
      @MarcDufresneosorusrex 3 роки тому

      @@alessiodecarolis thank you; am reading on Simo Haya the sniper (history is amazing)

  • @subhamomm5930
    @subhamomm5930 3 роки тому +2

    Wow very nice video please bro keep it up this type of work in future. Your all videos are very nice. I get very knowledge from your videos. Your channel is the channel on you tube

  • @miker.9138
    @miker.9138 3 роки тому +6

    2:20 When you keep building up your troops along each other's borders in a game if Risk, and you know things are gonna get wild

  • @alisaba5776
    @alisaba5776 3 роки тому +3

    Please make more video about Prussian history

  • @mostafasherif2685
    @mostafasherif2685 3 роки тому +8

    can you cover some medieval wars like the hundred years war please! :)

  • @woodcojb
    @woodcojb 3 роки тому +12

    I generally agree with the opening statement except subsitute 'small' for 'big'. Europe is not a big continent compared to other continents.

    • @florianb2856
      @florianb2856 2 роки тому

      Not if you just count the landscape, but when Im correct, it was, if you count the population (at least back then, today Asia is the nuber one continent in both).

    • @woodcojb
      @woodcojb 2 роки тому +1

      @@florianb2856 In 1850, Asia already had just under three times the population of Europe if you include all of Russia's population as European. Europe was #2, some 100 million ahead of Africa. But the intro talks about features like borders, not people.

    • @florianb2856
      @florianb2856 2 роки тому

      @@woodcojb Oh really? I didnt know. Thats interesting.

  • @chuekinsiu4667
    @chuekinsiu4667 3 роки тому +11

    War of the brothers nations.

    • @dragosstanciu9866
      @dragosstanciu9866 3 роки тому +3

      The Austrian Empire was a conglomerate of nations, the Austrians were a minority.

    • @superkamiguru6856
      @superkamiguru6856 3 роки тому +3

      ​@@dragosstanciu9866
      The Austrians were still the prestigious group that was more influential than the other groups. It wasn't until the Hungarian rebellion that the Austrians gave some cessions to the larger ethnic groups. But even then, that wasn't enough to completely stop the instability, merely halt it.

    • @dragosstanciu9866
      @dragosstanciu9866 3 роки тому

      @@superkamiguru6856 Exactly.

    • @thunderbird1921
      @thunderbird1921 3 роки тому

      The German Civil War, as some have called it.

  • @veryverynooob1287
    @veryverynooob1287 3 роки тому +12

    "With a continent so big" knowledgia
    "It's the smallest continent in the world" atlas

    • @Knowledgia
      @Knowledgia  3 роки тому +4

      -the smallest big continent*. Haha. Yeah, we should have formulated that differently. Thanks for watching!

    • @ajithsidhu7183
      @ajithsidhu7183 3 роки тому +1

      @@Knowledgia please do one on the sikh empire

    • @Veriox22
      @Veriox22 3 роки тому +2

      Oceania is smaller

    • @MasonGreenWeed
      @MasonGreenWeed 3 роки тому +1

      @@Veriox22 it ain't Continent, it's just cluster of Islands across Pacific

    • @Veriox22
      @Veriox22 3 роки тому +3

      @@MasonGreenWeed same thing. These islands do not belong to asia or any other continent so they are their own

  • @edwardfranks5215
    @edwardfranks5215 3 роки тому +3

    2 mistakes the Habsburgs made: picking a fight with Prussia in 1866 when Italy was also prepared to do a stab in the back and no there Power was willing to help Austria, and 2 the German alliance. The emperor should have listened to his family and not ordered mobilization against Serbia in 1914. He should have fired Hotzendorf and dealt with the death of the Archduke directly with the King of Serbia. The emperor didn't even like his nephew. The Dual Monarchy was not prepared for war. 50 million vs the 165 million Russian steam roller even with German help. Italy did a stab-in-back in May 1915 even though 1 million men were already dead and the Italian parliament voted 408 to 111 to remain neutral in M

  • @hanswiliam1602
    @hanswiliam1602 3 роки тому +1

    very cool explanations and animations. good work

  • @limperatoreviano7408
    @limperatoreviano7408 3 роки тому +9

    Honor to the Prussians from Piedmont 🇮🇹❤️🇩🇪

  • @dand7763
    @dand7763 3 роки тому +29

    ahhh! EU 4 vibes all over ...

  • @14.huanle60
    @14.huanle60 3 роки тому +5

    This battle is "Luckily for the Prussian" most of the time.

  • @NicolaW72
    @NicolaW72 3 роки тому +6

    Thank you very much for this very informative video, which is indeed a lesson in history! :-)

  • @ricochops
    @ricochops Рік тому

    Thank you for the super straight forward title.

  • @ShubhamMishrabro
    @ShubhamMishrabro 3 роки тому +3

    Make on Franco Prussian war

  • @DoSLG
    @DoSLG 3 роки тому +21

    Why at 1:25 does it show Saxe-Lauenburg as a part of Prussia when it wasn’t until after the second Schleswig war?

  • @dobriskorkavs5545
    @dobriskorkavs5545 3 роки тому +2

    Asia : let's have a big trade of things.
    EUROPE : let's destroy each other.

  • @andreasleonardo6793
    @andreasleonardo6793 3 роки тому

    Excellent historic video from excellent historic channel with clear explaining of foes forces mobility thanks for sharing

  • @mohammad.alkurdi.
    @mohammad.alkurdi. 3 роки тому +6

    Make a vidio about russo - turkish wars

  • @muhammadirfanjalaluddin1018
    @muhammadirfanjalaluddin1018 3 роки тому +11

    Idea: Boxer rebellion. The time where every major european colonial /non-colonial power, US, japan and Chinese christians teamed up to beat up China.

    • @MasonGreenWeed
      @MasonGreenWeed 3 роки тому +9

      An American, Australian, Austrian, Britain, German, French, Indian, Italian, Japanese, Russian, Spanish, Portuguese walk into Peking

    • @muhammadirfanjalaluddin1018
      @muhammadirfanjalaluddin1018 3 роки тому +3

      @@MasonGreenWeed Don't forget a dutch, belgian and a chinese christian.

    • @MasonGreenWeed
      @MasonGreenWeed 3 роки тому +1

      @@muhammadirfanjalaluddin1018 Belgian and Dutch didn't participate in 8 nation alliance

    • @muhammadirfanjalaluddin1018
      @muhammadirfanjalaluddin1018 3 роки тому

      @@MasonGreenWeed correct, but they still participated in the boxer rebellion.

    • @muhammadirfanjalaluddin1018
      @muhammadirfanjalaluddin1018 3 роки тому

      @Safwaan it's actually 55 days.

  • @tomfrazier1103
    @tomfrazier1103 3 роки тому +2

    I have a Medal for Konnigratz I found in an antique store rummage box in Vegas in the mid '90s.

    • @moritamikamikara3879
      @moritamikamikara3879 3 роки тому

      @@letoubib21 Us non-Germans do not have umlauts on our keyboard, making typing it correctly a huge pain in the ass. Please forgive us if we're not able to type it correctly.

    • @tomfrazier1103
      @tomfrazier1103 3 роки тому

      @@letoubib21 You Tube changes things automatically. I had initially spelled it correctly. I have been using a tablet for about five years, and probably use it such that I do not test it's potential.

  • @sniper02578
    @sniper02578 3 роки тому +2

    Omg pls do the first and second Schlewsig wars (Denmark - Prussia 1848 & 1864)

  • @yousefshahin2654
    @yousefshahin2654 3 роки тому +10

    I really love your content,can you do a video about the Egyptian Ottoman wars of 1831-1833 and 1839-1841

  • @DiscothecaImperialis
    @DiscothecaImperialis 3 роки тому +3

    Austria did still use the same weapons sold to Americans for their Civil War that ended in previous year.
    Prussia did find an opportunity to test a new infantry weapon--Dreyse Breechloader Rifle. and proven that Breechloaders were teh 'future'.

  • @KeanuSim0n
    @KeanuSim0n Рік тому

    This is really well made. Thanks a lot!

    • @mosmit8648
      @mosmit8648 8 місяців тому

      Well - it's Wilhelm, not Wilhem, the colour scheme yellow vs. orange is debatable, and there is no effort to pronounce the german names correctly - apart from that I agree.

  • @tomitiustritus6672
    @tomitiustritus6672 2 роки тому +2

    Hannovers part in this war is pretty shitty. Prussia and Coburg-Gotha invaded Hannover suprisingly during the annual summerly excercise. Meaning Hannover had 19.000 troops in the field, scattered and playing a hypothetical war when the real war broke out. Caught with their pants down by a multipronged attack, hannoverian forces just abandoned Hannover and retreated south, trying to slow down the Prussians by destroying railways and hoping to unite with the forces of the Deutscher Bund of german states against Prussia, that were gathering in the southern states. A prussian army managed to challenge the hannoverian army and was defeated by the hannoverians in the battle of Langensalza. Now the army was battered, tired and had many casualties and on top of that, even though a victory, the battle had bought enough time for the main prussian force to catch up. They had won their last battle against a numerically (correction: Hannover had the numerical advantage in that battle, but the disadvantage in the conflict), technologically and strategically advantaged foe, but their strategic situation had deteriorated so badly with that victory that they capitulated 2 days later. This is one of the best examples of a phyrric victory directly losing a war.

  • @FlyxPat
    @FlyxPat 3 роки тому +8

    I'd encourage anyone who's interested in the topic to read the Wikipedia article as a next stop.

  • @johnpepper8603
    @johnpepper8603 3 роки тому +5

    I live in Hradec Králové. Thats the city after which this battle is named. :)

    • @NicolaW72
      @NicolaW72 3 роки тому +2

      It´s indeed the (Czech) name of the city. In Germany it´s known under its German name: Königgrätz. And in Austria the battle is known as the battle of Sadova.

    • @johnpepper8603
      @johnpepper8603 3 роки тому

      @@NicolaW72 Hradec Králové is its name. The only name :) Those are alternative names from the past at best.

    • @NicolaW72
      @NicolaW72 3 роки тому +2

      @@johnpepper8603 No.

    • @johnpepper8603
      @johnpepper8603 3 роки тому

      @@NicolaW72 yes. learn some facts dude.

    • @Topvidi
      @Topvidi 2 роки тому

      @@johnpepper8603 Hradec Králové is the czech name and nothing more. Swallow that

  • @roncornelius8339
    @roncornelius8339 2 роки тому

    Thank You 😊 extremely interesting 🧐!!

  • @user-dt8vy2yb3d
    @user-dt8vy2yb3d 6 місяців тому

    Otto von Bismarck is very smart getting Italy as an ally in the Mid 19th Century.

  • @terrypennington2519
    @terrypennington2519 3 роки тому +6

    Damn I can't wait to do all this in Victoria 3!

    • @costamcostam8961
      @costamcostam8961 3 роки тому

      I hope Paradox will not screw this up. That game has potential to be their greatest work.

  • @drmustafa3538
    @drmustafa3538 3 роки тому +15

    The greatest time to Prussia...
    And they took a worst ally " italy"
    But still Prussia is a great nation in 19 century

  • @alparslankorkmaz2964
    @alparslankorkmaz2964 3 роки тому +2

    Nicely explained.

  • @neroclaudius7284
    @neroclaudius7284 3 роки тому

    An excellent video keep the good work up!

  • @YorkGod1
    @YorkGod1 3 роки тому +9

    The Needle Rifle & use of the Railways won the war for Prussia!!!

  • @uhbaoifuhoiafj456
    @uhbaoifuhoiafj456 3 роки тому +11

    Nice to hear about this battle. One of my ancestors fought in this war. He was lieutenant in the Prussian army and fought in Königsgrätz. I just found his certificate for a medal xD.

  • @doktorquanton4069
    @doktorquanton4069 Рік тому +2

    I always thought why Germany didn’t just claim Austria (the part that was already in the German confederation) and give the representatives of the Austrian states some power. I am not a European monarchie buff but if Bismarck wanted a unified Germany in my opinion that would have been the best option. Especially because Bismarck was aware of the tensions within the Balkan which resulted in the start of WW1.

  • @regiltube7932
    @regiltube7932 3 роки тому +2

    Prussia: Who's the Big Bro now.
    Austria: Very well
    France: Now you know all the Struggle you had faced is worth itit.

  • @constantinekorkousky3363
    @constantinekorkousky3363 3 роки тому +8

    Who else thought this was an armchair historian video?

  • @janvisser4132
    @janvisser4132 3 роки тому +3

    9:33. How is that handy, Germany was pulled in WWI by Austria-Hungary, lost, and that loss laid the foundation of WW2, which they lost even harder. Without the German-Austrian alliance we might not have had 2 world wars, or at least not 2 such brutal ones. Not putting blame for the wars solely on one side here btw, just tinkering a little bit.

    • @derps8690
      @derps8690 3 роки тому +9

      "germany was pulled in wwi by austria-hungary"
      no, germany was brought into the war by germany. they're the ones who declared war on russia, france and belgium, the latter action bringing the uk into the war.
      they thought they were tough and challenged everyone to war... then they did it again in ww2, and lost harder.

    • @kingfishyiii5338
      @kingfishyiii5338 3 роки тому +4

      @@derps8690 Germany wasn’t the only country that wanted war. France especially wanted war to get back Alsace Lorraine. And Britain and France were scared of Germany’s growing power. Both Austria and Russia wanted more influence in the balkans. And Germany was scared of Russias growing power. In the end, it was Germany who struck first, though war would’ve happened whether the Germans started it or not

  • @sonoftherabbitpeople4737
    @sonoftherabbitpeople4737 3 роки тому +1

    Some dates would be nice.

  • @KillahCP
    @KillahCP 3 роки тому

    Great video thank u keep up the videos

  • @USNVA11
    @USNVA11 3 роки тому +9

    The spirit of the Prussian Army still exists in Chile.

    • @d3203
      @d3203 3 роки тому +2

      they are marching wrong. They only kept the uniform

    • @letoubib21
      @letoubib21 3 роки тому

      Don't believe Mark Felton everything *. . .*

  • @Dybbouk
    @Dybbouk 3 роки тому +6

    Orders to the Austrian language were always issued in about 10 languages.

    • @fkjl4717
      @fkjl4717 3 роки тому +1

      not quite true. Czechs, Slovenes, Hungarians and others were learning German language and orders less or more intelligible. Also there was ethic officers who knew German language well.

  • @USSFFRU
    @USSFFRU 3 роки тому +1

    Denmark not claiming Holstein would probably not make a unified Germany to form by the 1800s.
    This was the nail on the coffin for the Austrian Empire, Austria's great power status was yeeted from this war.

  • @shawnbeckett1370
    @shawnbeckett1370 3 роки тому

    Awesome as always

  • @Inno7712
    @Inno7712 3 роки тому +27

    For me this is mostly the most interesting history in europe.

    • @neroresurrected
      @neroresurrected 3 роки тому +3

      Agreed, some people would say Ancient Rome, the crusades, the French Revolution or Napoleonic era, I would say the turn of the 19th century in Europe right before and immediately following 1848 revolution till the dawn of 20th century till onset of WWI is my favorite because the stakes were higher amongst the European nation states and Europe as a continent became more civilized and diplomatic in its disputes with one another as time progressed. I would even argue the politics of this period was equally as interesting as the many subsequent wars that were fought on the continent by extension. Men like Bismarck, The Kaiser, Emp. Franz Joseph, Napoleon III, Victor Emmanuel II were fascinating figures each to be sure.

  • @cnppreactorno.4965
    @cnppreactorno.4965 3 роки тому +6

    The Russo-Turkish war of 1877-1878 should also be covered

  • @shashanknaik3363
    @shashanknaik3363 3 роки тому

    great video. loved it

  • @balazsnagy2797
    @balazsnagy2797 2 роки тому +2

    The battle was decided by none other than the Prussian rear-loading Dreyse rifle, which had five times the rate of fire !! The number of losses also shows that the loss was exactly five times that on the Austrian side! Habsburg troops accustomed to assault combat melted in the Prussian rifle fire! Too bad there is no word on this in the video!

  • @CoryAlbrecht
    @CoryAlbrecht 3 роки тому +12

    "Hesse" is pronounced "hess-eh", "Elbe" is pronounced "elb-eh". German names should be pronounced as German, not English.

    • @bravo6829
      @bravo6829 3 роки тому +2

      I prefer the English way, it's just better.

    • @andrewrobinson2565
      @andrewrobinson2565 3 роки тому +1

      @@bravo6829 Except there isn't an English way - only a right way and a wrong way. Holstein "Hol-schtein" is another case in point. Knowledgia needs knowledge.

    • @teriblesoldiertv2108
      @teriblesoldiertv2108 3 роки тому

      Ok if so its called HesseN, so stop talking

    • @mattneil1449
      @mattneil1449 3 роки тому

      Ya well Germany tried twice and lost so English it is.

    • @rachitsah8305
      @rachitsah8305 3 роки тому

      @@bravo6829 you do realize that English is a Germanic language right LMAOOO

  • @Chris-hp9be
    @Chris-hp9be 2 роки тому +5

    I believe Russia would have helped Austria if they had not been betrayed in the Crimean war.

    • @Designer-Speech7143
      @Designer-Speech7143 2 роки тому

      Bismark secured Russians during his earlier diplomatic work ('exile') there. Tzar Alexander the Third was quite favourable towards Prussia.

    • @abdirahmanidris290
      @abdirahmanidris290 2 роки тому

      Austria was heavily disliked. Joining the Crimean war may have led to the British interfering

  •  3 роки тому +1

    The great war i have ever learned

  • @bertchintus4103
    @bertchintus4103 3 роки тому +1

    Yasssssss! Please do more videos on Prussia

  • @pedrojuan8050
    @pedrojuan8050 3 роки тому +3

    Really great video, but please take some time learning the language's native pronunciation. Other than that, really good.

  • @BHS25
    @BHS25 3 роки тому +4

    As Voltaire said "while some States possess an army ,the Prussian Army possess a state . Prussia was Europe Sparta of the time .

  • @nathandsouza7268
    @nathandsouza7268 3 роки тому +1

    The fact it's 10:47 and not 11 minutes makes it mare interesting

    • @DaRealKakarroto
      @DaRealKakarroto 3 роки тому

      it should've been 19:06
      too bad there are only 60 seconds in a minute

  • @justsomeguy1695
    @justsomeguy1695 3 роки тому +2

    Video idea: the war of the triple alliance or the 1857 Indian rebellion