Yes but I think he meant that racquets that are more flexible have less power. Thus, you need to find some power with your string setup. Anyway nowadays racquets manufacturers know that people prefer lower RA ratings because they think that it’ll be more comfortable. In reality, RA most of the time (if not all the time) measures the flexibility of the throat area and not the hoop. So, companies can « cheat » the RA rating to sell more racquets. I think this is exactly what’s happening with this gravity tour. The throat is flexible, but the hoop is stiff. So it gives more pop that the average flexible racquet.
SolowSports is the best!!!
Are you gonna do a review on the pro and mp too?
4:07 isn’t lower RA associated to better comfort?
Yes but I think he meant that racquets that are more flexible have less power. Thus, you need to find some power with your string setup. Anyway nowadays racquets manufacturers know that people prefer lower RA ratings because they think that it’ll be more comfortable. In reality, RA most of the time (if not all the time) measures the flexibility of the throat area and not the hoop. So, companies can « cheat » the RA rating to sell more racquets. I think this is exactly what’s happening with this gravity tour. The throat is flexible, but the hoop is stiff. So it gives more pop that the average flexible racquet.
Prefer the demo all black aesthetics with only the wordings in blue. It’s a pity, but it still plays very well if there is no change to the racket
moon baller xD
Gravity Pro is endorsed by Zverev and Rublev, not the Tour 😉
Zverev switched to the tour.
He switched to the old 100 Tour 18x20 not this one @@Nellethiex
Look at 1:06.
@@Nellethiex He switched to the old 100 Tour 18x20 not this new one
@@JoostPTM Zverev is the marketing face of the Gravity line, but he endorses (and was using) the Pro.