'The Perfect Woman Doesn't Exist": Milla Jovovich, Awkwafina, Eiza González, Emma Roberts | Sundance
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 січ 2019
- 'Paradise Hills' director Alice Waddington and stars Milla Jovovich, Emma Roberts, Awkwafina, Eiza González, and Danielle MacDonald join The Hollywood Reporter at the 2019 Sundance Film Festival to talk about their fantasy film about an extraordinary reform school for wayward girls.
#ParadiseHills #Sundance #TheHollywoodReporter
Subscribe for Roundtables, Box Office Reports, & More! ►► bit.ly/THRSubscribe
Stay in The Know With all Things Hollywood, Subscribe to THR News! ►► bit.ly/Sub2THRNews - Розваги
Milla Jovovich and Emma Roberts both look very young for their age, plus gorgeous.
Emma Roberts is only 27 lol
@@yakojjy- Only 27 but can pass for 17. That's why I said they look young for their age.
Eiza González such a Méxican beauty 🇲🇽🇲🇽👏
Eiza❤
Eiza ❤
This movie looks interesting.. not a really typical Hollywood movie, I think. The perfect human does not exist.. everyone has mistakes.. 🍀🍀
The audio is so low but Emma Roberts is gorgeous!
милла - русская королева
Eiza!!❤️
The title had me like, yup. But better yet, the perfect human does not exist. No, Woman, Man, Animal, Insect, Plant, Rock, is perfect, it just is.
Emma
The movie is underrated
i want emma and milla like mcu mainstream
Multi pass! Leelu Dallas multipass.
Hey, Park! Come 'ere, quick. You're never gonna believe this. It's Robin Fecnowitz!!! Coolness.
Not gonna lie, I thought Eiza was Michelle Rodriguez until they zoomed in
Wrong! I'm a perfect woman!
(I'm not even a woman, lol)
Eiza sure went to the surgeon to be the perfect plastic doll
Reema R90 all those ladies that you mention look natural, I see Eiza and platic comes to mind
It seems like Hollywood can't spent five minutes without bringing up the issue of the race or the issue of the gender, nowadays. "With the fluidity that exists"... ?! Jesus, these people live in a very precious, very progressive bubble. Oh well. I'll forget about it while I'll watch the movie. Unless, of course, the movie is pure propaganda. Hope it isn't.
It seems like bigots like you always get triggered when these topics are mentioned.
The youtube algorithm is really turning you guys into far-right zombies
@@voroldrwarfff8858 Vorol Drwarfff A "bigot" ? You don't say ! Let's see the definition of the word. Bigot : "a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions". So, that's what you were when you were writing your comment, right ? :) Plus, I don't know you, but your comment makes me think you're a progressive. And the thing is, partly because of the rise of atheism, progressiveness has turned into a religion, a religion far more influential than the church in today's western liberal democracies - Hollywood, the mainstream medias, and universities make that pretty clear. In the name of progressiveness, people in America go as far as criticizing free speech and historical accuracy ! The most emotional and vindictive persons I've talked politics with were progressives, which makes sense, because they're like cultists. So... since we're not in the 16th century anymore and I'm agnostic, I think you're more likely to be a bigot than me.
@@SCharlesDennicon Blablabla. Progressiveness is not a cult, it's just way more coherent with democracy than "conservativeness", which is pretty much the result of the human brain being unable to cope with the implications of this system.
Plus you say "in the name of progressiveness, people criticise free speech". I mean, you guys keep trashing the media and journalists, which are literally the symbol of free speech, but then keep whining whenever an insignificant real life troll has to deal with the consequences of his provocations. Hypocrisy to its finest form.
@@voroldrwarfff8858 "Blablabla" ? :D What a great way to start ! More "blablabla" :
- There's nothing coherent about progressiveness. You talk about democracy, but democracy is about the will of the majority, the common good, and citizenship, whereas progressives are all about the supreme rights of the individuals because Human rights (which are liberal in essence) are their code, and those two can't coexist equally. Nowadays' identity politics is the enemy of democracy because they're deeply narcissistic.
- You talk about "coping"... how ironic. Progressiveness can be summed up as the pathological inability to cope with the reality of the world. Which is why it's played such a huge part in the 20th century's bloodbath. To build a new, equal world, you have to destroy the old one. Simple, on paper.
- Conservatives today aren't trashing journalism because they don't believe in it. In my country, France, they have played a huge role in the growth of journalism in the 19th century, and it's one example. They just don't appreciate it when most journalists subscribe to the same ideology, serve the same masters, what we call political correctness. Diversity of opinions in journalism has been decreasing for the past thirty years, partly "thanks" to the triumph of liberal capitalism. Basically, it's not about the press, it's about the mainstream medias, whose high level of corruptibility has nothing to do with freedom of the press.
- Last but not least, you're talking about the young dude who "harassed" the Native American by looking at him, last month ? *sigh* What a... relevant argument. Yeah, Trump voters complain when liberals treat them like fascists because they've watched somebody. I would do the same if I was in their shoes.
Annoyingfina