Putting istihlāl as a condition is the way of the Murji’ah || Sheikh Abdulaziz ar-Rajihi

[@taifatul_mansurah]

Here is Tazkiyah of Abulaziz Āl ash-Sheikh (Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia) to Abulaziz ar-Rajihi:
ua-cam.com/video/c8q0pIFyBF4/v-deo.htmlsi=Qc_2etLhr9sLVrdc

[@deadshotff4227]

الإستحلال يكون لازما للتكفير في ما ليس كفرا في الذات ، بينما لا يلزم الإستحلال في ما هو كفر في أصله ،

[@jarirmuthana5642]

Do any of the scholars speak about a ruler who for example rules by sharia mostly but he allows the drinking of alcohol or the mixing of men and women without a time limit?

[@taifatul_mansurah]

0:46

[@denohart4929]

Sheikh Ibn Baz when he was asked:
“Is replacement [of the Shariah] with the secular law considered the kufr that expels from the religion? Shaikh Bin Baz’s answer: "When he declares this to be permissible (istibaaha) then he is considered a disbeliever with the major kufr (kufr akbar). However, if he does this due to specific reasons, such as bribery, to please certain people, whilst knowing that this is forbidden, then he has disbelieved with the lesser kufr (kufr doona kufr). As for when he does this while declaring it to be permissible (mustabeehan), then this is the major kufr, meaning that he has declared it lawful (istahalla) to rule by the secular law and not the Shari’ah. Then such a one is a kafir (disbeliever).
However, when he does this due to certain reasons such as bribery, or enmity (to someone, a group of people, etc.), or to please certain people and matters similar to this, then this is the lesser kufr (kufr doona kufr). This ruling covers all the various manifestations [of ruling by other than what Allaah has revealed], whether it is tabdeel (replacement [of the Shari’ah]) or other than tabdeel. And it is obligatory upon the wali ul-amr (the ruler) to refrain from that and to rule by the shari’ah of Allaah.”
(Hiwaar Hawla Masaa’il it-Takfeer Ma’a Allaamah ash-Shaikh Abdul-Azeez Iban Baaz).

[@taifatul_mansurah]

This is not about entirely replacing shari’ah. And I’m gonna delete ur comment because this is fitnah.

[@denohart4929]

@@taifatul_mansurahokay that’s fair then I misunderstood that. Entirely replacing the sharia is a completely different affair then replacing some.

[@taifatul_mansurah]

@@denohart4929 BarākAllahu fīk. u can also look at this fatwa of sheikh ibn uthaymeen (رحمه الله):
ua-cam.com/video/vJfQXU5lkYM/v-deo.htmlsi=eefaR5kEEn7QeHYc

[@taifatul_mansurah]

@@denohart4929even in this video, at 0:48 , sheikh Rajihi explains the difference between a ruler who entirely replaces the shari’ah with man made laws and a ruler who doesn’t rule by shari’ah in specific matters.

[@Follower_of_Salaf]

As salam aleykum brother, you had a video of shaykh ahmad al haazimi praising scholars like shaykh fawzan shaykh uthaymeen
Why did you remove that video??

[@taifatul_mansurah]

idk, I might re-upload it.

[@H_-it8hu]

So would this mean shaykh ibn Bāz was a murji'ī? He had this view when it came to legislating man-made laws.

[@taifatul_mansurah]

@@H_-it8hu No, the Murji’ah misinterpret words of the Sheikh. When he says that “one who doesn’t rule by shari’ah does not become a Kafir unless he commits istihlāl”
He means not ruling by shari’ah in specific cases, he (رحمه الله) doesn’t mean fully replacing the shari’ah.
Scholars have explained this. There is a difference between a person who fully replaces the shari’ah with man made laws, and a person who doesn’t rule by shari’ah in specific cases due to his desire while not committing istihlaal.
Even later on this video sheikh Rajihi also explains the difference between that.
U can also look at this fatwa of sheikh Ibn Uthaymeen where he explains this and refutes *the Murji’ah:
ua-cam.com/video/vJfQXU5lkYM/v-deo.htmlsi=X6-8ErTXGoXpir3W
And ill inshāAllah post fatwa of sheikh Ibn Baz (رحمه الله) on fully replacing the shari’ah with man made laws.

[@Ibn_Aisha_Al_salafi]

Sheikh rahimAllah was talking about not ruling by sharia in specific matters not entirely changing the sharia

[@H_-it8hu]

@@taifatul_mansurah understood, BarakAllahu feekum

[@taifatul_mansurah]

@@H_-it8hu و فيك بارك الله

[@nitrico4368]

@@taifatul_mansurah Asalamu Alaykum, do you believe there are any muslim rulers on this earth ? For instances the Ruler or Algeria,Saudi Arabia or Kuwait, are they muslims ?