Totally👌👌👌 Rolex has fanboys and flippers/speculators but bang for buck and tech wise way ya better out there and the bathyscape is def a killer of a watch ❤️🔥
@@seanang7845but the sub looks better 🤷♂️ who care about haute horology? A watch should looks good, and rolex watches looks most of the time better, than other watches.
@@luca_trajan then buy a sub as in better looking in your opinion. So I will wear the 50 and you wear your submariner but you will always know I have a better watch ha ha
I've handled the Blancpain Bathyscaphe, Rolex Submariner and quite a number of other dive watches. The Bathyscpahe is among the most gorgeous and in terms of quality and finish easily one or two notches above the Submariner.
Oh my God, Bruce!!! That piece is absolutely beautiful!! Stunning workmanship as only Blancpain know how! I'm jealous that you've had the opportunity to handle one. Great video, Bruce. :-)
Great watch review! I own this model on the bracelet for about a year. I am totally happy with it. For me it is an advantage to have a more discreet watch. The manufacture quality from Blancpain is absolutely superb. Also the beautiful Blancpain 1315 in-house caliber provides ultra high precision. Deviation is less than 2 s per day and thus one of the most accurate mechanical watches out there. The only thing that I have to criticise is the performance of date flip at midnight. The Rolex calibers do that much more precise and elegant. For all you guys who have concerns about its size with 43.6 mm in diameter: It wears much more compact since the lugs are comparatively close together. The bracelet (and I assume also the strap) folds down almost vertical and still elegant if you have a smaller wrist. I can really recommend to try it out by yourselves!
I think these pieces fall into the 'must see in person / in-the-metal' to appreciate. To me, this and the Fifty Fathoms just don't pop in video or in pictures. I would definitely like to see one in person sometime.
This watch feels like the ultimate dressy diver - very versatile. Unfortunately the bigger size was too big for my wrist while the smaller size (38mm?) felt a bit too small for a dive watch for me. I wish the lugs on the 43mm were shorter for this reason. Nice review.
On my wrist, I find the smaller indices make the watch more legible. At a gland the first thing the wearer sees is the hands. I love my 114060 SubC, but larger markers on the maxi dial, being high contrast to the deep black dial, draw the eyes attention - that's when the angle isn't showing glare of the non-AR coated crystal.
the indices of the Bathyscaphe are gorgeous isn't it. I saw my friend's the other day, beautifully finished hour indices, I have not seen a dive watch with that level of finish at that price point.
@@ryandoppelganger665 tried them both in florence. The blue one looked like a toy to me. This was amazing. The salesman told me they dont keep the 38 cause it was developed for women and nobodys buying them. I thought i would have liked the 38 since my wrist is 17 cms but, but, when i tried this on, 43mm, was just PERFECT :)
I have this piece in ceramic as well and love it but my crystal is covered in fine scratches. Do you happen to know anything about that? AR coating? I first noticed it within a couple months of purchase, had it replaced by my AD but now the second one is all scratched up too.
Would there be anyway if possible, you can do a 4 watch review? The Sub vs this Bathyscaphe vs the Original Fifty Fathoms vs the Seiko Marine Master 300m Hi Beat? That would be one killer Dive watch few. And BTW damn you, Bruce, every time I see another one of your videos I want to get another diver LOL.
Couldnt figure out how else to get ahold of you...lol.. Rob said maybe if i asked nice enough i could possibly buy an xl nick name sweat shirt 😬 to go with my t shirt😂😂👊
This watch is seriously growing on me, especially considering the fabricated unavailability of Rolex. I wish the case had a little bit of polish rather than all brushed and a better looking steel bracelet or a deployment clasp with the leather.
It´s not as prevalent as it should be because it doesn´t reflect light like a mirror and because 99,5% of the so called watch enthusiasts knowledge stretches from telling time on their Iphones 18 months ago to avidly coveting the Submariner today. I´ve been into watches for 25 years and few brands are so obsessed with quality as Blancpain thanks to Jean Claude Biver.
Spot on. I too have been into watches for >25 years, and I am rooting hard for the titanium version of the Bathyscaphe. Makes me think a lot of the great IWC Aquatimer 3536, but with a much higher level of finishing. I wish the Bathyscaphe was 1 or 2mm smaller, though I'm not sure it will prevent me from buying it.
I've actually been checking it out too. Such a high value proposition. Anyone who can sport the GST's 42 mm slightly chunky case (the titanium sure helps out a lot here) should definitely consider it and its timeless design language. You're basically getting the Sub and the Ingenieur in just one move and still have the money to take it on a holiday in Europe. And why not visit Schaffhausen while at it?
No mention of the insane accuracy? I have this identical watch and after two weeks it runs 9 seconds fast, that's +0.5 seconds per day! And Rolex likes to brag about the -2/+2 of their superlative chronometers.
do you guys honestly that scuba divers in this day and age with all these advancements in technology would use an old chronograph technology to measure their air supply xD go to any diving shop and you'll see the amount of equipment that is much more precise , easier to use even some watches that give you a small shock if its time to go up. so best thing is to change the name to chronographic watches non of the divers I know use a chronograph to tell their air time the only thing it is good for is measuring mins for tasks thats it
I think most people who are into watches realize that a "dive watch" is now more of a category of sport watch design, rather than a designation of critical equipment for SCUBA divers. (Although, functionally speaking, most luxury dive watches - such as the Bathyscaphe - meet the ISO definition of a dive watch, irrespective of what most divers actually use these days.) As such, I don't see that changing the name of the style is necessary. Similarly, I don't think we need to change the term "pilot's watch" to something else, just because pilots haven't strapped dinner-plate-sized, flieger-style watches to their wrists out of functional necessity since WWII. FYI, chronographs are stopwatches, so I'm not sure your choice of the term "chronographic" as a category for non-chronograph watches is likely to gain much traction - not that a single comment on a UA-cam video was going to change the accepted nomenclature of an entire industry anyway.
mac daddy the Piguet based movement isn't anywhere near Rolex tough but aside from that I rather think it was designed with a more dressy aesthetic, a Blancpain with scratches and dings would look dreadful.
There is choice between sailcloth strap (as shown), NATO-strap or bracelet. Choice is yours. But this particular strap is very impressive. No signs of anything after one year at all. And it looks amazing in person.
@@kw.7142 Oh yes, fair and important points! It is indeed super comfortable, it does not have leather so it's "green" and it's OK with water, even salty if you wash it OK. My choice over bracelet here! And I think in person that makes watch even better looking - it does have quality and secure, reassuring looks - you immediately feel THIS IS the strap!
Received mine last Tuesday and off it went back, a little boring with those tiny hours markers and straight slab mid case. I love Blancpain but the 40mm limited edition is what we really want not these weird bathyscaphe. The38mm doesn't hack and if you go counter clockwise the second hand moves in reverse! It's a movement shared with Piguet. I'll stick with my recent Starbucks, explorer 226570, new Sub NO date, Glashutte sea q rose gold, etc. until Blancpain puts more effort or offer the real divers I'm not buying, these really don't move much trust me I know.
I'm no Seiko fanboy, however, the Blancpain is an extremely dull looking watch. I'd have a Sub over a Blancpain. The Sub is beautifully made, sadly, it is the unimaginative choice. Furthermore, both of them offer little value and are incredibly overpriced (both brands are duping your ass into paying more for the 'prestige').
@@gregorypaulbox3035 That's exactly what Seiko does with "limited editions" of watches which do not offer nothing more compared to the regular ones. Exept maybe of much, much higher price.
What’s beautiful about it ? I would take the normal fifty fathoms or the normal sub anytime any day ... the sub with the polished sides is much more elegant and expensive looking ... and the movement is not sturdy ... so yeah 100 hours is nicer but it’s basically a dress watch movement that will break quite a lot ... one pays for the name only :(
What is so beautiful about Rolex? You see them everywhere and all the cheap brands make their own versions of the sub. It's nice to finally have something different being reviewed.
yeah u will talk to them a lot .. and each visit will cost you 1.2 k dollars every four years .. and the bracelet is 3 fuckin k ... are u fucking kidding me for that money I will get a brand new omega 300 m which has a better movement lol ... like I am sorry but this is why this shitter on a gray market costs what it should be 8.5 k euro ... exactly as much as the hulk ... but the hulk is a hulk and this is a shit watch
I think sub, date just 41 , Daytona are all as nice as overseas and royal oak .. I really do ... just when u take one in ur hands u feel the quality ... and I like the normal fifty fathoms a lot ... but at this size ... u have to be a multi milliner on a yacht in summer time to pull it off... its just too big .. and going back to Rolex ... well yeah u do see them a lot ... but so do u see a lot of 911 or the Mercedes s class ... I guess if u need a rolls Royce of watches then it would be the patek 5180/1R ... but I don't need such a watch as a daily sport watch ..
and I agree with you I love hearing bruces opinions and watching his reviews .. I just love it. and as a matter of fact I love this watch ... its shit but I still think its even worth getting ...especially the 38 mm version ..but again .. this watch is for collectors ... not a must have one ... I still think they could make it 40 instead of 38 or whatever size this one is ... just like blancpain could start making again its best watches - Leman collection ... or the master control could be improved etc etc ... or moser and chi could start making cool watches etc etc etc... these brands are so bad in doing business and creating great products ... they all need a Steve jobs type of person who would just take away all the shit products and focus on their good 4-6 watches ...
I know it's an iconic watch from a horologically significant brand, but this watch does not appeal to me at all. It looks plain, and frankly, kinda cheap. Maybe seeing one in the metal will change my mind.
The hour markers are too small. The dial appears boring because there is too much free space due to the undersized hour markers. The full size fifty fathoms looks much better because the hour markers fill the dial.
@@sergei-guille-walczak. Je ne connais pas le terme "guezouille" (a supposer meme qu'il existe), mais j'imagine qu'il a une teneur homophobe. L'intolerance, la mechancete et la betise vont souvent de pair, aussi ne suis-je pas surpris. Bisous.
A Rolex Submariner has nothing on this piece. It's haute horology and in another league. 👌
Totally👌👌👌 Rolex has fanboys and flippers/speculators but bang for buck and tech wise way ya better out there and the bathyscape is def a killer of a watch ❤️🔥
@@seanang7845but the sub looks better 🤷♂️ who care about haute horology? A watch should looks good, and rolex watches looks most of the time better, than other watches.
Compare f1 blancpain and tha f3 roro???
@@luca_trajan nope
@@luca_trajan then buy a sub as in better looking in your opinion. So I will wear the 50 and you wear your submariner but you will always know I have a better watch ha ha
I've handled the Blancpain Bathyscaphe, Rolex Submariner and quite a number of other dive watches. The Bathyscpahe is among the most gorgeous and in terms of quality and finish easily one or two notches above the Submariner.
Oh my God, Bruce!!! That piece is absolutely beautiful!! Stunning workmanship as only Blancpain know how! I'm jealous that you've had the opportunity to handle one. Great video, Bruce. :-)
Awesome you got your hands on one. SO under the radar.
Great watch review! I own this model on the bracelet for about a year. I am totally happy with it. For me it is an advantage to have a more discreet watch. The manufacture quality from Blancpain is absolutely superb. Also the beautiful Blancpain 1315 in-house caliber provides ultra high precision. Deviation is less than 2 s per day and thus one of the most accurate mechanical watches out there. The only thing that I have to criticise is the performance of date flip at midnight. The Rolex calibers do that much more precise and elegant.
For all you guys who have concerns about its size with 43.6 mm in diameter: It wears much more compact since the lugs are comparatively close together. The bracelet (and I assume also the strap) folds down almost vertical and still elegant if you have a smaller wrist. I can really recommend to try it out by yourselves!
Great looking piece! the movement is absolutely gorgeous. Would definitely like to see one of those on my wrist!
Beautiful watch! Great video and still shots. I like the coins on the table. Great historic piece!
I use to dive with my seamaster bond, but this is my grail watch! Thanks for sharing this video. That’s a beauty
I'm surprised there's no mention of the second hand being a hair away from the chapter ring showing further precision. Gorgeous
Nice, understated watch, beautiful dial. Price is insane. Good job, Bruce
I think these pieces fall into the 'must see in person / in-the-metal' to appreciate. To me, this and the Fifty Fathoms just don't pop in video or in pictures. I would definitely like to see one in person sometime.
I like Blancpain, one of my favorite brands. We should see more of it on You Tube. Thank you for this video sir. 👍
This watch feels like the ultimate dressy diver - very versatile. Unfortunately the bigger size was too big for my wrist while the smaller size (38mm?) felt a bit too small for a dive watch for me. I wish the lugs on the 43mm were shorter for this reason. Nice review.
Bathyscaph has got 38mm model. 50F limited editions got 40mm, yeah only limited editions :(
Great movement, great rotor, and so on - a fantastic watch - except the date.
Amazing brand and amazing watch!
Stunning watch. I was never a fan of the Rolex Sub and this watch explains why. It does everything so much better. Two thumbs up BP!
On my wrist, I find the smaller indices make the watch more legible. At a gland the first thing the wearer sees is the hands. I love my 114060 SubC, but larger markers on the maxi dial, being high contrast to the deep black dial, draw the eyes attention - that's when the angle isn't showing glare of the non-AR coated crystal.
the indices of the Bathyscaphe are gorgeous isn't it. I saw my friend's the other day, beautifully finished hour indices, I have not seen a dive watch with that level of finish at that price point.
There is also the 38mm version for those with smaller wrists. I am mulling over purchasing the blue dial version.
Yes... I prefer the smaller one in blue although the one reviewed here looks quite sharp
@@ryandoppelganger665 tried them both in florence. The blue one looked like a toy to me. This was amazing. The salesman told me they dont keep the 38 cause it was developed for women and nobodys buying them. I thought i would have liked the 38 since my wrist is 17 cms but, but, when i tried this on, 43mm, was just PERFECT :)
@@user-do8ef4np7q what a load of crap
Thank you for sharing your watch Danny and thank you Bruce for such an amazing review :)
Jeffrey Wood You’re welcome 👍
Love this design and the dial is gorgeous. A bit outside my price point at the moment.
I have this watch in black ceramic and absolutely love it. Nice review
I have this piece in ceramic as well and love it but my crystal is covered in fine scratches. Do you happen to know anything about that? AR coating? I first noticed it within a couple months of purchase, had it replaced by my AD but now the second one is all scratched up too.
It’s beautiful however I don’t know if it may be a little big for my tastes ...
Thanks for review, Bruce, it's good as always.
This B B has two drawbacks for me: tiny markers, and high price. I'll stick to seiko this time.
Also the date window position.
Impressive watch. Impressive video.
Great review you did well! Don Haines Approves!
Would there be anyway if possible, you can do a 4 watch review? The Sub vs this Bathyscaphe vs the Original Fifty Fathoms vs the Seiko Marine Master 300m Hi Beat? That would be one killer Dive watch few. And BTW damn you, Bruce, every time I see another one of your videos I want to get another diver LOL.
Love the second hand, face, and crown... dislike the date window and the minute markers could be slightly larger relative to the large face space.
Wow, I'd love one. In a world full of Subs, so gorgeous, so under the radar...
That watch on a nato is perfection.
What a lovely watch! Nice review. I always enjoyed the way you show us details.
Couldnt figure out how else to get ahold of you...lol.. Rob said maybe if i asked nice enough i could possibly buy an xl nick name sweat shirt 😬 to go with my t shirt😂😂👊
I love this watch! Can’t decide if I go for the black, blue or green dial 🤷🏼🤩I need the ceramic version though 🫣
I get the blue ceramic with the sail cloth strap. Even the pin buckle is ceramic. It’s stunning 🤩
Very impressive watch
That is beautiful!
Stunning.
How do you get so many varieties of watches to review! :)
The bracelet for this watch is impressive, if you can get one..
That is a beautiful watch, under the radar is good!!
Fifty Fathoms Automatique is my dream watch, which has a white, orange testing circle on the dial!
that's the tribute to Mil-Spec model which is vastly different to the Bathyscaphe. That one is gorgeous as well but significantly pricier though.
What reference is this? 5000-1230?
great content!
Nice watch! :)
Gonna get this for my 40th birthday present to myself.
Ughh that would be a perfect one watch daily wearer
As an owner I can definitively say all my other watches hate it.
This watch is seriously growing on me, especially considering the fabricated unavailability of Rolex. I wish the case had a little bit of polish rather than all brushed and a better looking steel bracelet or a deployment clasp with the leather.
Would be nice to see a factory bracelet with this peice
I love it but those tiny hour markers create too much negative space
Stunner
Cheers!!
Wish the markers were a bit larger
The lume is so cool. The gold version of this is my grail watch. But I like all the versions of it.
How does the lume compare to a Sub?
I own the Fifty Fathoms (45mm) and 10 times out of 10 I'd pick it over a Sub.
Irving Escobar 45mm lol
Are you 6”8 365? no need to go over a 42 ever, for any human
@@aceburgers8801 the 43mm bathyscaphe doesn't wear that big imo, could pass as a 41-42mm watch due to the relatively slim lugs and no crown guards.
How awesome it is.
What's with all the coins on the counter?
The desert version is one of my grails:)
Nice Watch but the originale fathoms Is Legend....Good review!
Beautiful watch. The indices are a touch too small, which has put me off buying, every time I look at a new review they seem even smaller.
Fifty shades of gray.
Very nice watch but it is to expensive (Like all watches from Blancpain). 5-6 k would bei OK....
Why same reference numbers got different luminescence? Some are green and some are blue, but it’s exactly same watch….
Although I love the Bathyscaphe, the Fifty Fathoms is a much better comparison with the Sub.
Guys is this 5000 1230?
Sharp watch...nothing beats the Submariner though in my opinion...!!!
The rotating bezel action (feel/sound) on these Bathyscaphe definitely don't feel refined.
It felt refined when I tried it.
If only it came with a deployant clasp, I hate pin buckles.
hermoso !!!
Great watch but normal full size Fifty would be my choice.
Beautiful watch. Stupid lug width
It´s not as prevalent as it should be because it doesn´t reflect light like a mirror and because 99,5% of the so called watch enthusiasts knowledge stretches from telling time on their Iphones 18 months ago to avidly coveting the Submariner today. I´ve been into watches for 25 years and few brands are so obsessed with quality as Blancpain thanks to Jean Claude Biver.
Spot on. I too have been into watches for >25 years, and I am rooting hard for the titanium version of the Bathyscaphe. Makes me think a lot of the great IWC Aquatimer 3536, but with a much higher level of finishing. I wish the Bathyscaphe was 1 or 2mm smaller, though I'm not sure it will prevent me from buying it.
I've actually been checking it out too. Such a high value proposition. Anyone who can sport the GST's 42 mm slightly chunky case (the titanium sure helps out a lot here) should definitely consider it and its timeless design language. You're basically getting the Sub and the Ingenieur in just one move and still have the money to take it on a holiday in Europe. And why not visit Schaffhausen while at it?
I prefer the Blancpain fifty fathoms. It’s more of a submariner look. Just better quality all round.
The sub is more of a fifty fathoms look than the other way around;)
No mention of the insane accuracy? I have this identical watch and after two weeks it runs 9 seconds fast, that's +0.5 seconds per day! And Rolex likes to brag about the -2/+2 of their superlative chronometers.
The bezel operation sounds awful
do you guys honestly that scuba divers in this day and age with all these advancements in technology would use an old chronograph technology to measure their air supply xD go to any diving shop and you'll see the amount of equipment that is much more precise , easier to use even some watches that give you a small shock if its time to go up. so best thing is to change the name to chronographic watches non of the divers I know use a chronograph to tell their air time the only thing it is good for is measuring mins for tasks thats it
I think most people who are into watches realize that a "dive watch" is now more of a category of sport watch design, rather than a designation of critical equipment for SCUBA divers. (Although, functionally speaking, most luxury dive watches - such as the Bathyscaphe - meet the ISO definition of a dive watch, irrespective of what most divers actually use these days.) As such, I don't see that changing the name of the style is necessary. Similarly, I don't think we need to change the term "pilot's watch" to something else, just because pilots haven't strapped dinner-plate-sized, flieger-style watches to their wrists out of functional necessity since WWII. FYI, chronographs are stopwatches, so I'm not sure your choice of the term "chronographic" as a category for non-chronograph watches is likely to gain much traction - not that a single comment on a UA-cam video was going to change the accepted nomenclature of an entire industry anyway.
Beats the sub and seamaster anyday
Cheaper then a Sub:)
My grail watch… 🤤
Any watch that has the date window in that position doesn't get my attention 👎
Pure Beauty!!!
No thanks. Love my Subs... Great presentation Bruce, as usual...
awesome watch, still prefer a rolex!
Rolex?! Gibt meca break.
Personally I'd much rather the Blancpain, but it is a different kind of proposition, far less robust and perhaps not a daily wearer..
You have it all wrong, it was made to be a daily wearer and is very robust.
mac daddy the Piguet based movement isn't anywhere near Rolex tough but aside from that I rather think it was designed with a more dressy aesthetic, a Blancpain with scratches and dings would look dreadful.
Blonpong🤣🤌 Sorry my man haha
Honestly, for a $10K watch the finishing of the case leaves a lot to improve.
there's nothing wrong with the finish of the case, it's actually well finished. Videos and photos don't do the watch justice.
I love the fifty fathoms and this one has some cool specs , but in my opinion this design is just boring
Haha maybe that is why I don't see it as often in the community. First few comments have all been negative.
The beauty is in the simplicity!!
..... and nobody will be asking "is it real?"
I've yet to get that question with any watch
Great review btw
Really impressive watch. But, no bracelet for 10k? The bands look cheap and take away from the beauty of the watch.
Real world prices you can get the watch as shown for under 8K and the version with a bracelet for 10K.
There is choice between sailcloth strap (as shown), NATO-strap or bracelet. Choice is yours. But this particular strap is very impressive. No signs of anything after one year at all. And it looks amazing in person.
@@minusED yes, not to mention super comfortable and 100% waterproof. Love mine on the sailcloth strap.
@@kw.7142 Oh yes, fair and important points! It is indeed super comfortable, it does not have leather so it's "green" and it's OK with water, even salty if you wash it OK. My choice over bracelet here! And I think in person that makes watch even better looking - it does have quality and secure, reassuring looks - you immediately feel THIS IS the strap!
Received mine last Tuesday and off it went back, a little boring with those tiny hours markers and straight slab mid case. I love Blancpain but the 40mm limited edition is what we really want not these weird bathyscaphe. The38mm doesn't hack and if you go counter clockwise the second hand moves in reverse! It's a movement shared with Piguet. I'll stick with my recent Starbucks, explorer 226570, new Sub NO date, Glashutte sea q rose gold, etc. until Blancpain puts more effort or offer the real divers I'm not buying, these really don't move much trust me I know.
The Seiko SLA025 blows it away and I also prefer it over the Sub.
ha ha ha ha....I fell off my chair laughing.....that was a great joke.
I'm no Seiko fanboy, however, the Blancpain is an extremely dull looking watch. I'd have a Sub over a Blancpain. The Sub is beautifully made, sadly, it is the unimaginative choice. Furthermore, both of them offer little value and are incredibly overpriced (both brands are duping your ass into paying more for the 'prestige').
@@gregorypaulbox3035 That's exactly what Seiko does with "limited editions" of watches which do not offer nothing more compared to the regular ones. Exept maybe of much, much higher price.
That comment must've came from a parralel universe, where Seiko, Citizen and Orient are the Holy Trinity
@@Mint-cb2vc lmao
its butt ugly, if you want to be different i understand but as far as beauty contests go its got nothing on a no date sub
Lovely but date window fail on a massive scale.
What’s beautiful about it ? I would take the normal fifty fathoms or the normal sub anytime any day ... the sub with the polished sides is much more elegant and expensive looking ... and the movement is not sturdy ... so yeah 100 hours is nicer but it’s basically a dress watch movement that will break quite a lot ... one pays for the name only :(
lol talk to a watchmaker about this caliber.
What is so beautiful about Rolex? You see them everywhere and all the cheap brands make their own versions of the sub. It's nice to finally have something different being reviewed.
yeah u will talk to them a lot .. and each visit will cost you 1.2 k dollars every four years .. and the bracelet is 3 fuckin k ... are u fucking kidding me for that money I will get a brand new omega 300 m which has a better movement lol ... like I am sorry but this is why this shitter on a gray market costs what it should be 8.5 k euro ... exactly as much as the hulk ... but the hulk is a hulk and this is a shit watch
I think sub, date just 41 , Daytona are all as nice as overseas and royal oak .. I really do ... just when u take one in ur hands u feel the quality ... and I like the normal fifty fathoms a lot ... but at this size ... u have to be a multi milliner on a yacht in summer time to pull it off... its just too big .. and going back to Rolex ... well yeah u do see them a lot ... but so do u see a lot of 911 or the Mercedes s class ... I guess if u need a rolls Royce of watches then it would be the patek 5180/1R ... but I don't need such a watch as a daily sport watch ..
and I agree with you I love hearing bruces opinions and watching his reviews .. I just love it. and as a matter of fact I love this watch ... its shit but I still think its even worth getting ...especially the 38 mm version ..but again .. this watch is for collectors ... not a must have one ... I still think they could make it 40 instead of 38 or whatever size this one is ... just like blancpain could start making again its best watches - Leman collection ... or the master control could be improved etc etc ... or moser and chi could start making cool watches etc etc etc... these brands are so bad in doing business and creating great products ... they all need a Steve jobs type of person who would just take away all the shit products and focus on their good 4-6 watches ...
they've taken a classic design and ruined it
Awesome review, but Judas priest that's an ugly watch (My opinion). So much unused real estate.
It’s funny to see how much you Americans struggle to pronounce fairly known, European brand names....😁😂
They've pronounced it wrong since 1735, we're just correcting the mistake.
Sporkmaker5150 ...😂😂😂...
I know it's an iconic watch from a horologically significant brand, but this watch does not appeal to me at all. It looks plain, and frankly, kinda cheap. Maybe seeing one in the metal will change my mind.
The hour markers are too small. The dial appears boring because there is too much free space due to the undersized hour markers. The full size fifty fathoms looks much better because the hour markers fill the dial.
Qu'est-ce que c'est moche Blancpain 👎 ! 👎 ! 👎 !
Qu'est-ce que c'est moche, les mecs a casquette
@@johnnyguitar6697 que ça fait ''cassos'' le prénom Johnny 🤮🤣🤮
@@sergei-guille-walczak. C'est mignon de penser que c'est mon vrai prénom. Bisous
@@johnnyguitar6697 je ne suis pas un ''guezouille'' gardé vos bisous pour votre conjoint !
@@sergei-guille-walczak. Je ne connais pas le terme "guezouille" (a supposer meme qu'il existe), mais j'imagine qu'il a une teneur homophobe. L'intolerance, la mechancete et la betise vont souvent de pair, aussi ne suis-je pas surpris. Bisous.
I think this is only of the ugliest divers ever. It's so plain, and its beady-eyed markers are gross.