COP28: King Charles says dangers of climate change are no longer distant risks | BBC News

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
  • King Charles III has urged world leaders gathered in Dubai to make the COP28 climate summit a "turning point".
    In a speech on the second day of the conference, the monarch warned that despite some progress "we remain so dreadfully far off track".
    He called for "genuine transformational action", a day after the meeting opened with stark warnings on global warming.
    The King said he has spent “a large proportion of my life trying to warn of the existential threats facing us over global warming, climate change and biodiversity loss”.
    He said that despite this, decades later there is 30% more CO2 in the atmosphere now than back then, and almost more than 40% more methane.
    Subscribe here: bit.ly/1rbfUog
    For more news, analysis and features visit: www.bbc.com/news
    #COP28 #ClimateChange #BBCNews

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,8 тис.

  • @jeffsmith3392
    @jeffsmith3392 10 місяців тому +267

    It's certainly his favourite subject. But, our King runs 4 homes in England, 3 in Scotland and 1 in Northern Ireland.

    • @alanfrost4661
      @alanfrost4661 10 місяців тому +40

      Total hipocrite do as i say not what you want

    • @deemo5245
      @deemo5245 10 місяців тому +27

      Hundreds actually, boats, planes, cars

    • @angelh5762
      @angelh5762 10 місяців тому

      Not to mention he and others all flew there in their private jets. It's do as I say not as I do. They think we are all stupid. Yes raping the earth for resources is not new, but one energy option is not the answer. IMHO.

    • @gjustg1540
      @gjustg1540 10 місяців тому +31

      He doesn't though, the taxpayer runs them

    • @MrAvant123
      @MrAvant123 10 місяців тому +27

      I dont know why he's getting involved in this -he's making himself look even more silly.

  • @dakerisj6428
    @dakerisj6428 10 місяців тому +166

    Do as we say, not as we do.

    • @raine767
      @raine767 10 місяців тому +2

      right👎👎👎

    • @PhyzzFizz
      @PhyzzFizz 10 місяців тому +8

      better still ignore everything they say, always and forever

    • @tommyhall6695
      @tommyhall6695 10 місяців тому +5

      ​@@PhyzzFizzWEF puppet

    • @PhyzzFizz
      @PhyzzFizz 10 місяців тому +2

      @@tommyhall6695 yep

    • @weareintheendtimes.704
      @weareintheendtimes.704 6 місяців тому +2

      Never do what they say.

  • @JanetMacleod-zw6uq
    @JanetMacleod-zw6uq 10 місяців тому +102

    Rich people telling other folks why they should be happy barely scraping by. 👎

    • @cjhards
      @cjhards 10 місяців тому

      Absolute joke of a narrative.
      As is this bloke! ✌️🤡

    • @P05BMR5Q
      @P05BMR5Q 10 місяців тому +1

      You wouldn't listen to a poor person either would you

    • @SarthorS
      @SarthorS 10 місяців тому

      Well I guess he could exercise his power and seize ownership of all the power companies, forcing them not to make record profits by increasing prices. And he could order the armed forces to reconquered former countries of the British Empire that are rich in natural resources.

    • @juntus89
      @juntus89 6 місяців тому

      ​@@SarthorShe has no such power. The government has all the power, he's just a figure head. A puppet of the state.

  • @btr8390
    @btr8390 10 місяців тому +190

    Am I the only person who finds it insane when billionaires grill normal people about these issues? Gaslighting at its most cartoonish.

    • @paulskinback717
      @paulskinback717 10 місяців тому +18

      Cos it's all lies

    • @jackspring7709
      @jackspring7709 10 місяців тому

      Not at all - it's disgusting listening to these pampered and privileged billionaires and trillionaires preaching to us and robbing us at the same time. This overgrown spoiled brat is a perfect example of the parasite class.

    • @public.public
      @public.public 10 місяців тому +2

      And your opinion is worth more than a starving child's?

    • @Isochest
      @Isochest 10 місяців тому

      It's a criminal's Jerkoff. Getting away with a con gives them an orgasm!

    • @markcynic808
      @markcynic808 10 місяців тому

      I find it insane that anyone believes we can change the climate. Utterly absurd and a huge waste of money.

  • @SD-tq1pl
    @SD-tq1pl 10 місяців тому +150

    Man who travels by helicopter and has over 200 bedrooms in various palaces around the country whilst accepting millions of dollars in cash payments, stuffed into supermarket bags from oil shieks tells us how serious climate change is and how the people are going to have to make sacrifices. I feel a South Park episode coming.

    • @lightingbolt8148
      @lightingbolt8148 10 місяців тому +6

      Exactly

    • @Raymund-Swales
      @Raymund-Swales 10 місяців тому

      At least someone is. After living in Key West Florida for 28 years, it's pretty obvious anyway.

    • @whatayear
      @whatayear 10 місяців тому +3

      Plus gaining peoples assets who die without making a will, and have no family. Disgusting.

    • @jackspring7709
      @jackspring7709 10 місяців тому

      Yes - and the overgrown, pampered, sheltered, spoiled brat isn't even bothered by his own hypocrisy.

    • @SamOreo7
      @SamOreo7 10 місяців тому

      Keep whining😂

  • @clairepp9755
    @clairepp9755 10 місяців тому +179

    I came here on my private jet to preach about climate change. 😂

    • @public.public
      @public.public 10 місяців тому +8

      I don't believe you own a private jet.

    • @paololuckyluke2854
      @paololuckyluke2854 10 місяців тому +10

      @@public.publicNo, he travels on flying carpets.

    • @void9837
      @void9837 10 місяців тому +5

      It's not the jet that is the problem. They collect money for cleaning the lakes, rivers and ocean and don't clean the environment like they promised to. They don't remove chemicals from the food supply and water or provide adequate water treatment plants. All the world leaders, not just this British leader. Psalm 2

    • @garlicbreath7259
      @garlicbreath7259 10 місяців тому +3

      OOh an insy winsy small mind, nice to met ya.

    • @ThomasKelly669
      @ThomasKelly669 10 місяців тому +3

      Did you listen to Him

  • @anthonybernstein9698
    @anthonybernstein9698 10 місяців тому +120

    The king, the prime minister, and the chancellor of the exchequer all go to a conference and travel in separate planes. After all three of these champions of climate change end their weekend jolly they jump back on their choice of transport, each in his own plane and return to the jolly old uk and tell us all about "ZERO CARBON BLAH BLAH BLAH". 160 "dignitaries pitch up in their own form of transport, the local lads arrived by air conditioned camel all others flew in on ZERO CARBON planes. I have every confidence in these brilliant leaders.

    • @steverichmond7142
      @steverichmond7142 10 місяців тому +1

      Have you ever been to Israel by road?

    • @Isochest
      @Isochest 10 місяців тому +8

      Shows it's all a load of bollocks

    • @public.public
      @public.public 10 місяців тому +3

      Yeah he should ride there on a donkey?

    • @Patrick-y4d1z
      @Patrick-y4d1z 10 місяців тому +5

      @@steverichmond7142
      They could've gone on a webcam ;)

    • @anthonybernstein9698
      @anthonybernstein9698 10 місяців тому +1

      @@steverichmond7142 only by el al, the food is better & the security is 1st class

  • @edgarfriendly5321
    @edgarfriendly5321 10 місяців тому +40

    "So I gave up my private jet"
    Oh wait no I didn't

    • @thesmallnotesduo
      @thesmallnotesduo 10 місяців тому +7

      But he wants YOU to give up virtually everything.

    • @edgarfriendly5321
      @edgarfriendly5321 10 місяців тому +3

      @@thesmallnotesduo ole' Charles Richmond sausage fingers won't be giving up anything.

    • @thesmallnotesduo
      @thesmallnotesduo 10 місяців тому

      Agreed my friend but he's very willing to give up millions of 'his' citizens. Overpopulation and all that@@edgarfriendly5321

  • @ianharley1726
    @ianharley1726 10 місяців тому +83

    70,000 attendees! How did they get there? The arrogance of these people!

    • @ianharley1726
      @ianharley1726 10 місяців тому +19

      ​@MatthewPlant05 never heard of zoom. This is the most polluting COP meeting ever. King Charles carbon footprint dwarfs a small nation.

    • @sonofsomerset1695
      @sonofsomerset1695 10 місяців тому

      @@MatthewPlant05 Obviously you've never heard of this thing called the internet, yet you've managed to comment on it without even noticing it exists, quite an achievement, no wonder you fall for the climate scam.

    • @nunya5555
      @nunya5555 10 місяців тому

      Then they will go back home to their Energy Sucking Mega Mansion with numerous bedrooms and bathrooms that nobody uses! Our governments have already handed us over to these Evil Elite Non-governmental organizations

    • @onelove111
      @onelove111 10 місяців тому +2

      So true

    • @fredscratchet1355
      @fredscratchet1355 10 місяців тому

      They want to bring all these ideas in and change the climate but they want us the public to pay for it. Why do the UK cabinet drive around in V8 petrol automatic Range Rover's the tell us to buy electric?
      Their hypocrisy defies belief. It's like Red Nose day when rich "celebrities" tell the rest of us to dig deep and give what you can.

  • @JudithNope
    @JudithNope 10 місяців тому +164

    Why, just why are these people travelling in private jets and at the same time asking us, the ones that have no the same means as they have, to make sacrifices.
    Such level of hypocrisy is unbearable. 😔

    • @frankfisher8423
      @frankfisher8423 10 місяців тому +14

      They are the overclass. You vill eat ze bugz.

    • @budbud2509
      @budbud2509 10 місяців тому +1

      Windsor has lost it Village Idiot again ...
      The finest education UK could provide and he turns out to be a lying
      Thicko with NO knowledge of Science or Physics
      Jug eared Tvvat
      ua-cam.com/video/jNd0HEvFWLs/v-deo.html

    • @consultant2678
      @consultant2678 10 місяців тому

      Because it’s all a scam on taxpayers who these people aren’t to provide tax credits & legislation to benefit Green Tech that will provide no real benefit !!

    • @Jonathan-h1w9j
      @Jonathan-h1w9j 10 місяців тому +5

      Let them eat cake

    • @enbonj5842
      @enbonj5842 10 місяців тому +2

      They are mainly speaking to leaders to make meaningful change in legislation

  • @Greenpoloboy3
    @Greenpoloboy3 10 місяців тому +49

    Boring Charles flies in on his own Private Jet
    Fishi Sunak flies in on his own private jet
    Boring William flies in on his own private jet

  • @keithhooper6123
    @keithhooper6123 10 місяців тому +90

    He blatantly lied,when he said CO2 had increased by 30%

    • @Sjb-on5xt
      @Sjb-on5xt 10 місяців тому

      A/ It's still a trace gas at 0.042% (420ppm)
      B/ The warming effect trails off to almost zero past 300ppm, according to a science paper from Prof William Happer
      C/ CO2 levels were dangerously low in 1870 at 280ppm. If that had continued to 150ppm, the plants would suffocate. We saved the planet by man's contribution.

    • @stevec6427
      @stevec6427 10 місяців тому +11

      No, he is correct. He's not saying that the proportion of CO2 has increased from 0.03% to 30.03%, he is saying the absolute proportion of CO2 has increased by 30% so from 0.03% to 0.04%

    • @P05BMR5Q
      @P05BMR5Q 10 місяців тому +20

      ​@stevec6427 the plants will love the increase in co2

    • @paulgibbons2320
      @paulgibbons2320 10 місяців тому

      @@P05BMR5Q no it does not work like that. They can't suddenly process more CO2 just because it's present. You need more plants to process more CO2.
      If they are destroyed in wild fires. We have less. The science is not bullshit. Try listening to it.

    • @hanndonfield91
      @hanndonfield91 10 місяців тому +1

      ​@@paulgibbons2320alright pet you listen to your masters!

  • @mrakronyahoo
    @mrakronyahoo 10 місяців тому +65

    Is that why he chose to fly to COP using his private jet?

    • @theresamcghee8362
      @theresamcghee8362 10 місяців тому +2

      Did he really !!!!!?

    • @shrach8
      @shrach8 10 місяців тому +1

      Imagine him in the economy class of a passenger flight. You can't! Because private jets is how the higher class travel.

    • @G0N0X
      @G0N0X 10 місяців тому +3

      No, he used a boat and rows from UK to Dubai, stop spreading lies 😂

    • @wobblybobengland
      @wobblybobengland 10 місяців тому +8

      @@theresamcghee8362 And Sunak took one, and Cameron, all seperate, they couldn't get the RAF to fly them together.

    • @winstoningram99
      @winstoningram99 10 місяців тому +8

      The hypocrite could have used Zoom

  • @daviddukes9392
    @daviddukes9392 10 місяців тому +59

    I'm glad to say the majority of the general public have got more common sense and they won't fall for this nonsense

    • @SarthorS
      @SarthorS 10 місяців тому

      You mean the bumpkins who believe conspiracy theorists and corrupt politicians over scientists?

    • @hgbnkbggj2915
      @hgbnkbggj2915 10 місяців тому

      So 'common sense' to you is ignoring the global scientific consensus? Frankly, common sense is overrated. Global warming is not intuitive, it requires complex analysis of data.

    • @axelbruv
      @axelbruv 10 місяців тому

      Which part is nonsense?

    • @daviddukes9392
      @daviddukes9392 10 місяців тому

      @@axelbruv
      Climate emergency and netzero

    • @sonofsomerset1695
      @sonofsomerset1695 10 місяців тому

      @@axelbruv The part where they pretend humans can control an ever changing world climate with millions of variables, many of which we dont know about or understand, just by reducing CO2, how about that little part?

  • @janeglossop465
    @janeglossop465 10 місяців тому +27

    He made a speech 20 years ago saying that both our ice caps will have disappeared by 2015??? Still there i think.

    • @lewtube6436
      @lewtube6436 10 місяців тому +4

      They're bigger than ever.

    • @hgbnkbggj2915
      @hgbnkbggj2915 10 місяців тому +4

      @@lewtube6436 False. What is your source?

    • @Honking_Goose
      @Honking_Goose 10 місяців тому +2

      Did he? Where's your source?

  • @PaulWelsh
    @PaulWelsh 10 місяців тому +76

    Did he forget his speech the other day giving the green light to new oil and gas drilling in the north sea? Doesn't he know he has a larger carbon footprint than some countries!

    • @PhyzzFizz
      @PhyzzFizz 10 місяців тому +3

      you know that BP came up with the term 'carbon footprint' dont you?

    • @PaulWelsh
      @PaulWelsh 10 місяців тому +3

      @@PhyzzFizz I don't care who came up with the term. It doesn't stop it being a real thing. You are completely missing my point.... The hypocrisy of King Charles telling people to act now on climate change.
      If people listen then it's worthwhile I guess, but I don't see him using his political power to act. Talking about the issue isn't getting us anywhere.

    • @PhyzzFizz
      @PhyzzFizz 10 місяців тому

      @@PaulWelsh you dont care because you brain has been fried by this no stop nonsense attack. just stop oil from making up popular slogans lol mug

    • @djdusted6485
      @djdusted6485 10 місяців тому

      ​@PaulWelsh using manufactured statistics to drive an agenda does not make it a real thing.

    • @Quidditch54321
      @Quidditch54321 10 місяців тому +3

      Although it is called the King's Speech, it is always written by the government! And has been for a very long time! HMK does not necessarily agree with its contents.

  • @patriciawhite2718
    @patriciawhite2718 10 місяців тому +48

    David Bellamy pity he ain't here anymore but loads of good people out there calling this out .

    • @chrissy4863
      @chrissy4863 10 місяців тому +5

      He was a good honest man. Today they have no voice sadly.

    • @daddymulk
      @daddymulk 10 місяців тому +5

      Top man he was but because he spoke out against it he got cancelled

    • @craigedwards7062
      @craigedwards7062 10 місяців тому

      He was wef aswell I'm affraid

    • @jackspring7709
      @jackspring7709 10 місяців тому +4

      Bellamy was a star. He called all this bs out at the very beginning and paid a very heavy price for it.

  • @blowduke
    @blowduke 10 місяців тому +19

    From a man who hasn’t done a hard days work in his life telling us to work every day not go anywhere ,no car , no holidays turn heating off and no meat .

  • @richardllynfi6714
    @richardllynfi6714 10 місяців тому +20

    Do some research and it is easy to call this nonsense out. These people are the biggest hypocrites of all.

    • @Cherrylipgloss2025
      @Cherrylipgloss2025 5 місяців тому

      They are also untouchable and no law can take down the King 👑

  • @Beatlefan67
    @Beatlefan67 10 місяців тому +87

    'The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants' - Albert Camus

    • @public.public
      @public.public 10 місяців тому +1

      Meaning what with regards to the speech?

    • @ErenYega747
      @ErenYega747 10 місяців тому +1

      Camus was a guy who cheated on his wife so much that she ended up in a psychiatric hospital. Celebrate and emulate him as much as you want, don’t expect people to find someone credible because they’re quotable
      - Person with an opinion

    • @onelove111
      @onelove111 10 місяців тому

      Nice one.

    • @onelove111
      @onelove111 10 місяців тому

      @@public.publictyranny will do whatever they can to try n show they support us. When they don’t give a damn

    • @onelove111
      @onelove111 10 місяців тому

      @@ErenYega747you have to separate the artist from his work. He wrote things that will inspire generations for generations to come.

  • @innovirtua
    @innovirtua 10 місяців тому +22

    He's the Prince of Davos, not the King of England.

    • @markcynic808
      @markcynic808 10 місяців тому +1

      He isn't the king of England. He's the king of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. There hasn't been a king or queen of England since 1707. Try and catch up, Eeyore.

    • @innovirtua
      @innovirtua 10 місяців тому +1

      @@markcynic808 Neither is apt, so it's fine, Zebedee.

    • @markcynic808
      @markcynic808 10 місяців тому

      @innovirtua
      The mental incontinence is strong in you, oh braying one. Some food for thought, 🥕.

    • @poolplayerpoolplayer7430
      @poolplayerpoolplayer7430 10 місяців тому +1

      @markcynic808 who cares?! We get his point

    • @markcynic808
      @markcynic808 10 місяців тому

      @poolplayerpoolplayer7430
      I care, and that's all that matters. I dislike ignorance and those, like yourself, that believe such ignorance deserves to be defended.

  • @alantaylor5216
    @alantaylor5216 10 місяців тому +18

    King Charles should be giving China his Klaus Schwab speech.

    • @bigbarry8343
      @bigbarry8343 10 місяців тому

      even more so india - they are peddling russian oil to the west at hudreds of billions in profits

    • @mountaindragon7289
      @mountaindragon7289 10 місяців тому

      Why?

  • @1caremsa
    @1caremsa 10 місяців тому +18

    Here's a man with multiple homes, cars, boats and planes that are used regularly by him his family and entourage, with a holiday Castle in Balmoral with 50,000 acres telling us we are the problem for using more than we need, unbelievable hypocrisy!

  • @fluffy-puffy-puppy
    @fluffy-puffy-puppy 10 місяців тому +21

    Meanwhile back in England I'm freezing my butt off, and can barely afford energy bills.

    • @ZackWolfMusic
      @ZackWolfMusic 10 місяців тому +2

      Sounds like a you problem 😂 😮!!

  • @andrewdalziel4006
    @andrewdalziel4006 10 місяців тому +64

    It is barely above freezing here today in Aberdeen. I have just been for a walk along the coastal path and with my binoculars I counted 115 offshore wind turbines. Not one of them was turning due to there being no wind. Apparently the answer is to have even more wind turbines which will stand absolutely still on the very days when we need more electricity. Someone really has not thought this through.

    • @douglastodd1947
      @douglastodd1947 10 місяців тому +1

      @andrewdalziel4006 Cambusbarron Stirling Minus 1 Cent @14.45

    • @Paul-qn7qf
      @Paul-qn7qf 10 місяців тому +3

      Electricity is stored.Jeez do some research.

    • @GregTheReaper
      @GregTheReaper 10 місяців тому +3

      Solar panels..that'll surely work great in a country where it's usually pissing with rain 80% of the time.

    • @sharonreichter2537
      @sharonreichter2537 10 місяців тому +3

      Not only that, but the blades go into land fill.

    • @Quidditch54321
      @Quidditch54321 10 місяців тому +1

      We need WAVE POWER

  • @llewev
    @llewev 10 місяців тому +25

    This is a political position and the King should not be engaged in politics. He is flouting the constitution. The problems and policy reaction to climate change is a matter for political debate which his government ministers are there to conduct in parliament. If he wants to promulgate climate change policies, he should give up the crown.

    • @MaxAndrew
      @MaxAndrew 10 місяців тому +1

      Thing is, most members of the public *are* very concerned of climate change. It’s not like it’s divisive rhetoric like other things.

    • @Alicedoesart
      @Alicedoesart 10 місяців тому

      It’s a matter for all life on Earth! This isn’t about policy?! This transcends politics! What an absurdly moronic comment!

    • @EVOpower
      @EVOpower 10 місяців тому

      ​@MaxAndrew no there not.

    • @poolplayerpoolplayer7430
      @poolplayerpoolplayer7430 10 місяців тому +2

      ​@MaxAndrew it's left wing propaganda!!

    • @MaxAndrew
      @MaxAndrew 10 місяців тому +2

      @@poolplayerpoolplayer7430 Imagine thinking caring about the environment is propaganda. 😂

  • @aidiess
    @aidiess 10 місяців тому +60

    The hug a tree brigade personified ! and a great friend of the WEF. Does anyone actually take anything this guy says seriously ??? They have spent hundreds of years very successfully perfecting their public image, and they've done a great job ?????? " All that glitters isn't gold "

    • @steverichmond7142
      @steverichmond7142 10 місяців тому +1

      I am a tree hugger going back to the 70s. I have made a fortune out of sustainable profits. You are obviously working for Big Oil. Despicable. I take him very seriously having worked in the polluted oil fields of Nigeria.

    • @Quidditch54321
      @Quidditch54321 10 місяців тому

      Are you not even listening to David Attenborough either? Or to the many scientists warning us?

    • @stevezodiac491
      @stevezodiac491 10 місяців тому

      Charles used to say that his plants used to grow faster, if he talked to them, until he found out he was breathing CO2 onto them lol.

  • @thegoat11111
    @thegoat11111 10 місяців тому +26

    I have little doubt that he flew their by private jet.

    • @user-ug8wx5er1w
      @user-ug8wx5er1w 10 місяців тому +1

      Of course. You don’t pay tax on private jet fuel.

    • @amthinking-p9n
      @amthinking-p9n 10 місяців тому

      Why would this point be so necessary? So you listen to the speech? Are you jealous? What a bad human being you are? Or shit?

  • @sichere
    @sichere 10 місяців тому +31

    A 30% increase of carbon when it's only 0.04 % of the atmosphere is not a lot but most of it can be attributed to the dignitaries gathered in the once desolate fishing port of Dubai for the COP28.

  • @555frontier
    @555frontier 10 місяців тому +20

    Our overlords don't mind flying private jets to join climate summit nonsense talks.

    • @SarthorS
      @SarthorS 10 місяців тому

      You realize that this is a trick to get you to ignore what they are actually saying, right? Like Republicans saying 'they want to take your guns away' to stop people listening to those talking about sensible gun control laws in the US.

  • @jonnsonsam
    @jonnsonsam 10 місяців тому +53

    Would those 'mitigations' happen to be less people? Maybe a world population of 500 million by any chance?

    • @ashishvatsavai6982
      @ashishvatsavai6982 10 місяців тому +2

      Or why don’t we go back to being in thousands, so that we can live like hunter gatherers without need for agriculture…

    • @stevec6427
      @stevec6427 10 місяців тому +1

      It doesn't need to be less people, just reducing our reliance on fossil fuels would help massively and would be achievable. Relying entirely on a resource which rockets in price every time there is a war in the most unstable part of the world isn't working out too well. We need massive investment in nuclear, tidal, wind and solar all of which are cheaper and not subject to the same price fluctuations

    • @jonnsonsam
      @jonnsonsam 10 місяців тому

      @@ashishvatsavai6982 The elites will still need their slaves to do the heavy lifting so they can live in luxury.

    • @steverichmond7142
      @steverichmond7142 10 місяців тому +1

      Population is beginning to decline ... Japan as an example

    • @josephhunter907
      @josephhunter907 10 місяців тому +7

      thats what theyre aiming for a 90 percent reduction

  • @Sjb-on5xt
    @Sjb-on5xt 10 місяців тому +16

    "warmest temperature on record"
    75% of those global thermostats in weather stations are inside urban heat islands, in cities, large towns and next to runways.
    Who are they trying to fool?

    • @moleyrusselswart
      @moleyrusselswart 10 місяців тому +3

      and the cheating baskets are using ground temperatures instead of air temperatures

    • @hgbnkbggj2915
      @hgbnkbggj2915 10 місяців тому +1

      Absolutely false. The measurements are carefully controlled and standardised.

    • @Sjb-on5xt
      @Sjb-on5xt 10 місяців тому +2

      @@hgbnkbggj2915 Yes, carefully controlled and standardised. I would add to that carefully located too, inside urban heat islands. The variant between urban and rural setting can be much as 6C warmer during day and night by 8C.

    • @hgbnkbggj2915
      @hgbnkbggj2915 10 місяців тому +1

      @Sjb-on5xt Nonsense. The weather stations are not placed to skew the data, and differences in urban/rural areas is accounted for. Besides, there are many, many stations at sea where these factors do not exist.

    • @Sjb-on5xt
      @Sjb-on5xt 10 місяців тому

      @@hgbnkbggj2915 Many were placed there years ago in rural settings, in orchards and green fields. Some placed near 2miles of concrete runways for pilots to use. Then over time the towns and cities encroached around them. Whatever reading you get from them now is corrupted. So they should either be relocated or exclude them from the global average. The fact that they include this corrupted data shows what a con it is.

  • @philipparker1319
    @philipparker1319 10 місяців тому +39

    There was once a king who believed he could command the sea to not come in.

    • @thesmallnotesduo
      @thesmallnotesduo 10 місяців тому +4

      This time the sheeple meekly obey.

    • @thorkagemob1297
      @thorkagemob1297 10 місяців тому +7

      If you are talking about Canute, he knew he couldnt command the sea to stop. He was making a point lol

    • @jackburton1455
      @jackburton1455 10 місяців тому +2

      SPOILER ALERT... he drowned!

    • @cjhards
      @cjhards 10 місяців тому +1

      And the one that had a bacon as a best friend?!! Jimmy Jimmy!!! ✌️🤡

    • @SarthorS
      @SarthorS 10 місяців тому

      @@retiredbore378 There's no point talking facts to climate change deniers. If they cared about the truth, they wouldn't be CCD's.

  • @aanttz4803
    @aanttz4803 10 місяців тому +52

    A political King cannot be a constitutional monach at the same time.

    • @SarthorS
      @SarthorS 10 місяців тому

      It's right wing political parties that have turned scientific fact into political opinion.

    • @douglastodd1947
      @douglastodd1947 10 місяців тому

      @aanttz4803 He isn't King. The Bernician posted on You Tube 5 th August 2020 Appears Parliaments Deposed QE II of Sovereignty, Face like a smacked arse, I've worked out it happened ON or just before SHE entered Parliament minus the I.S.C. lying on a wee table by HER side 14 th October 2019. Explains why Charlie wasn't Crowned with it , but had it on HIS Head when emerging from behind drapes.

    • @RyanJones-ew8vm
      @RyanJones-ew8vm 10 місяців тому

      We need to get rid of the " royal family" we have little gimps like Andrew who are protected because they are "royal".

    • @public.public
      @public.public 10 місяців тому +9

      Nothing party political about exercising your survival instinct.

    • @gogosegaga
      @gogosegaga 10 місяців тому +10

      We kind of need him given the clown like state of our government these days.

  • @leet3207
    @leet3207 10 місяців тому +14

    Hi BBC can you do a breakdow of the carbon footprint to host this event including all the flights and also of the war in ukraine, Libya, Iraq and afghanistan?

    • @deswaterfall3044
      @deswaterfall3044 10 місяців тому

      They use Carbon offset by planting a tree to cover themselves about flying alone in a jet.

  • @patykirpg2614
    @patykirpg2614 10 місяців тому +6

    he got to Dubai in private jet yeah piss off with this

  • @billynomatz9233
    @billynomatz9233 10 місяців тому +13

    Tell him to lead by example ,then we will follow ,but we know he’s not going to do that

    • @SarthorS
      @SarthorS 10 місяців тому +2

      I'm not aware of him owning massive fossil fuel corporations. In fact, by the things he has said over the decades, he would more likely be into renewables and eco work.

    • @aleksiwilson2295
      @aleksiwilson2295 10 місяців тому +1

      ​@@SarthorSthe things he's SAID, not done. You don't see the backroom deals with oil sheikhs

    • @billynomatz9233
      @billynomatz9233 10 місяців тому +2

      @@SarthorS Yes he can afford to do it ….also he could take a train instead of a private jet but he doesn’t want to do it ,because it’s inconvenient for him , and doesn’t suit his elitist lifestyle, but it’s okay if NetZero is inconvenient for the rest of us

    • @hgbnkbggj2915
      @hgbnkbggj2915 10 місяців тому

      ​@SarthorS But he's also a supporter of homeopathy, which is scientific nonsense. He has no scientific legitimately. That said, he's not wrong, I just think he is entirely the wrong person to say it.

    • @SarthorS
      @SarthorS 10 місяців тому

      @@hgbnkbggj2915 He's a huge public figure. He is better suited to saying it than nameless scientists. So long as he passes on actual science, it's fine. And yes, no one should listen to him if he starts babbling about homeopathy, but he isn't talking about that garbage.

  • @dawndickson564
    @dawndickson564 10 місяців тому +6

    The earth belongs to God

    • @sonofsomerset1695
      @sonofsomerset1695 10 місяців тому

      No no, we must mine it for all the metals to please the climate change cult or we are all doomed.... to listen to more of these ignorant speeches!

    • @jacquibrown2000
      @jacquibrown2000 10 місяців тому

      Amen

  • @johnmunkley9475
    @johnmunkley9475 10 місяців тому +13

    Time to make Britain a REPUBLIC

  • @Set-ri6rs
    @Set-ri6rs 10 місяців тому +14

    Let him use his own money then if he feels sensitive about these things since him and his have done quite well out of modern society, frankly I could not care less about any of these things much less feel like paying for any of them.

    • @SarthorS
      @SarthorS 10 місяців тому

      No he hasn't. A hundred years ago he would have been an emperor in control of 1/4 of the world.

  • @UK-Blue
    @UK-Blue 10 місяців тому +8

    What a shame we have either a liar or a deluded King.

    • @BigBoaby-sg1yo
      @BigBoaby-sg1yo 10 місяців тому +3

      He’s a WEF puppet , therefore a liar 😮

    • @UK-Blue
      @UK-Blue 10 місяців тому +1

      @@BigBoaby-sg1yo
      Me thinks you are bang on point.

  • @stevezodiac491
    @stevezodiac491 10 місяців тому +10

    I have been on the earth in England for 65 years. The summer is still hot ( most of the time ( and the winter is still cold ) and politicians, yeomen, scribes and notaries still spout hypocritical s- - t -.

    • @itk2493
      @itk2493 10 місяців тому

      According to my old man, climate change doesn't effect England when I pointed this fact out to him.🤣😂

    • @hgbnkbggj2915
      @hgbnkbggj2915 10 місяців тому

      Your personal anecdotal experience is worthless compared to the mountains of data that proves, beyond doubt, that global warming is rapid and real.

  • @gumtreeterry9904
    @gumtreeterry9904 10 місяців тому +11

    He goes on to say the earth does not belong to us, which is true irony given that this is coming from the head of the royal family whose entire wealth and indeed the platform thereby from which he seeks to lecture the rest of us is based upon the premise that all land ultimately belongs to the king.

    • @tenbear5
      @tenbear5 10 місяців тому +1

      Yes, even the ground your own house sits upon.

  • @carlyoung6111
    @carlyoung6111 10 місяців тому +13

    It did not take long for KC to turn his back on his mothers teachings to interfere in politics did it?

  • @SeymourClevage
    @SeymourClevage 10 місяців тому +64

    Such heart felt words from a man who takes a separate private jet from his counterpart who lives in the same city.

    • @twyscape
      @twyscape 10 місяців тому +4

      Billions of people have their own private car and don’t take the bus. We ALL are guilty. Charles is in a role that commands the highest security and that means he has to have his own private vehicles. It’s not even his choice.

    • @daddymulk
      @daddymulk 10 місяців тому

      ​@@twyscapeso!

    • @JamesWilson-uw4zv
      @JamesWilson-uw4zv 10 місяців тому

      non of us are prefect, I still use pastic bag and look at my spelling.

  • @andrewmacaulay9272
    @andrewmacaulay9272 10 місяців тому +16

    LEAVE OUR CHILDREN ??? ALONE ??? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @Veeger
    @Veeger 10 місяців тому +5

    The UK is responsible for only 0.9% of global co2 emissions.
    Even if the UK managed to stop this 0.9% , 99.1% of emissions come from other countries.
    China , US, and India are the ones who can make the difference. Meanwhile in the UK we are subject to ever increasing green taxes on the energy we all use. Where are these taxes going?
    The tories stopped subsidies for solar and just about killed the industry a decade or so ago. Every roof could be generating power. The roof of every supermarket , a missed opportunity. With battery storage a huge necessary industry was hobbled by the tories , now they are taking coal fired power stations out of mothballs to fill up the shortfall in our energy generation. And we pay GREEN TAXES FOR THAT?

    • @Stu_Pidasso
      @Stu_Pidasso 10 місяців тому

      They think the world revolves around western politics. It’s truly stupid.

    • @user-ug8wx5er1w
      @user-ug8wx5er1w 10 місяців тому +2

      I have to pay £12.50 a day in London to drive as I can’t afford a new car. 😢
      Watching these people makes me feel physically sick 🤢

  • @pitbull2005
    @pitbull2005 10 місяців тому +6

    Well maybe if you brought down your own carbon footprint that would be a start! What a hypocrite!

  • @ronaldseal5637
    @ronaldseal5637 10 місяців тому +37

    I do hope his private jet supplies levels of comfort befitting of a king.
    It would be do sad to see him have to choose between eating and keeping his kids warm like some of us do.
    Such an inspiration.

    • @shawroberts5149
      @shawroberts5149 10 місяців тому +1

      Wishing you well with your litterpicking, recycling, upcycling, thrift shop donations, horticulture, fuel limitation, beach clean ups, hazardous chemical control, supporting local shops and reaping natures harvest etc...

  • @andyhelliwell4955
    @andyhelliwell4955 10 місяців тому +16

    Charles has never done a days hard work in his life, but he owns so much.

    • @c.pop.echo.28
      @c.pop.echo.28 10 місяців тому +1

      that means he had powerfull grand daddies

    • @amthinking-p9n
      @amthinking-p9n 10 місяців тому

      I think you are jealous, you don’t have your parents maybe, you don’t raise children maybe, you are a slut?

  • @cameroncopus9737
    @cameroncopus9737 10 місяців тому +12

    I thought he said that he wasn't going to get into politics when he became King

    • @hgbnkbggj2915
      @hgbnkbggj2915 10 місяців тому

      Global warming shouldn't be political. It's not remotely controversial in scientific circles, only by politicians who see it as a threat and inconvenience.

    • @roygreenwood79
      @roygreenwood79 10 місяців тому +1

      He may not have been telling the truth 😊

    • @lewtube6436
      @lewtube6436 10 місяців тому

      It's another "read my lips" moment.

    • @JohnJaneson2449
      @JohnJaneson2449 10 місяців тому

      And he picked the WRONG politics.

  • @traceybulloch3401
    @traceybulloch3401 10 місяців тому +17

    Here for the comments.....heartening to see that most are switched on to the fact we are being lied to...big time! Keep pushing back. 😊

    • @jamescook9125
      @jamescook9125 10 місяців тому

      Because only morons bother to comment on something everyone else takes as obvious. Like how people are more likely to leave a review if they disliked a product.

  • @kevintheobald4286
    @kevintheobald4286 10 місяців тому +7

    What a wonderful example he sets! 😂😂😂 This emperor has no clothes 😮

  • @dannypickering7360
    @dannypickering7360 10 місяців тому +30

    doing his paymasters bidding, why is a king being political, Klaus will be proud

    • @rogernevin7461
      @rogernevin7461 10 місяців тому +2

      2 Krauts together.

    • @SarthorS
      @SarthorS 10 місяців тому +1

      He's not the one who decided to turn scientific fact into political opinion. And he's not the one who is in the pay of anyone. That would be the right wing politicians who you follow.

    • @sonofsomerset1695
      @sonofsomerset1695 10 місяців тому

      @@SarthorS Unfortunately for you, the right has facts on it's side, the models he is promoting have already been demonstrated to be wrong by real world data, unlucky.

    • @dannypickering7360
      @dannypickering7360 10 місяців тому

      define right wing@@SarthorS

    • @SarthorS
      @SarthorS 10 місяців тому

      @@dannypickering7360 Depends on where you are. In most first world countries, right wing would mean generally preferring the status quo, generally preferring money over people, generally preferring less government and more free market.
      In the US, dial that up many times and add in Christian extremism, denial of certain sciences, demonisation of socialism, anti-education, anti universal healthcare and welfare programs and massively pro gun. Also throw in a hefty does of nationalism.
      That's laying it on thick of course, but you have a significant amount of the right wing that are like that.

  • @samuelfranklin9112
    @samuelfranklin9112 10 місяців тому +12

    In other words poor people have to change their ways, but the rich (the problem) do not!

  • @SecwetGwiwer
    @SecwetGwiwer 10 місяців тому +5

    From the man who makes a helicopter trip (on average) every other day. Sacrifice is for the plebs!

  • @dawndickson564
    @dawndickson564 10 місяців тому +6

    Don't place Faith in this world 🌎 place your hope and faith in Jesus

  • @Isochest
    @Isochest 10 місяців тому +4

    They could have hosted the whole thing on Teams. It's just a Jolly for the overrated power holders

  • @ianbanner9292
    @ianbanner9292 10 місяців тому +18

    Not a mention of the various Weather Control technologies being used ! Such as the extensive Chemtrails , shown to make forest/bush fires explosive and uncontrolable . Or the various agencies and companies that boast of redirecting atmospheric currents .
    Many of the fear engendering events cited , coincide with weather control systems starting , or being used .

    • @Sjoldschool
      @Sjoldschool 10 місяців тому +3

      The average person doesn’t look into the information that you’re referring to… I know exactly what you’re talking about and I agree completely. This gathering of people is akin to devil worshipping cult.

    • @SarthorS
      @SarthorS 10 місяців тому

      Your delusions are so crazy that even Hollywood couldn't make them into a movie without people thinking it's too ridiculous.

    • @matt79hz
      @matt79hz 9 місяців тому

      Why would a criminal tell the truth ?

    • @SarthorS
      @SarthorS 9 місяців тому

      @@matt79hz Why should anyone care what a dumb peasant has to say?

  • @Stu_Pidasso
    @Stu_Pidasso 10 місяців тому +24

    *Shame his best friend Jimmy can’t see him now.* 😢
    *Luckily his brother Andrew is here for him.* 👌🏼

    • @PhyzzFizz
      @PhyzzFizz 10 місяців тому +2

      those 3 together could save the world with all their special youth work

    • @Stu_Pidasso
      @Stu_Pidasso 10 місяців тому

      @@PhyzzFizz 💀

    • @shawroberts5149
      @shawroberts5149 10 місяців тому +1

      Why do you continue to reference a renowned ***ophile in your comments? Your ongoing interest in JS is disquieting.

  • @theumarianmeme1483
    @theumarianmeme1483 10 місяців тому +4

    It's called an "interglacial period". They never tell you that do they.

    • @sonofsomerset1695
      @sonofsomerset1695 10 місяців тому +1

      How could they pretend to save us if they told us the truth? C'mon.

  • @nicjackson5741
    @nicjackson5741 10 місяців тому +4

    Couldn't they have had a zoom conference, and having it in Dubai one of the biggest oil producers there is...or was that intentional to drive the message home?

  • @philipmichael4106
    @philipmichael4106 10 місяців тому +5

    Since when did King Charles become a scientist, He failed his eleven plus, didn't he?

    • @moleyrusselswart
      @moleyrusselswart 10 місяців тому

      he once stood in a dustbin, may be he should get back in one

  • @natashasingha0078
    @natashasingha0078 10 місяців тому +3

    Let’s start with
    No more wars !!
    No one can deny the effect on the environment .
    Put the same Investment into the economy instead of war . Quite simple really.

  • @ChrisAndCats
    @ChrisAndCats 10 місяців тому +4

    Why - as he's supposed to stay out of politics and remain neutral in all things - is he even there? He was told not to go last time.

  • @riksstuff.6429
    @riksstuff.6429 10 місяців тому +5

    Sustainable my arse.
    How many of them are wearing a pair of 6 year old trousers like I am?
    How many of them will eat sandwiches made at home & carried in an old ice cream tub for lunch like I did?
    How many of them arrived at work today in a 17 year old car like I did? ( I have the option of a 26 year old van too!)
    How many of them will walk into town tonight?
    Yet I am made to reduce my 'carbon footprint'.
    I am taxed to pay for their travel.
    I am taxed to pay for their stupid schemes.
    My freedoms will be taken away.

    • @Quidditch54321
      @Quidditch54321 10 місяців тому

      Actually, the King does get a lot of wear out of his clothes and keeps older vehicles.

    • @riksstuff.6429
      @riksstuff.6429 10 місяців тому +1

      @@Quidditch54321 ah that'll be the collection of cars worth an estimated £6.3 million. Do you think they might be kept in a climate controlled garage or on the driveway outside? And I bet his trousers don't look like my Craghoppers!

  • @JulianWoodfield
    @JulianWoodfield 10 місяців тому +4

    There is a lot of whinging in the comments but this is a good speech and these are important points.

    • @sonofsomerset1695
      @sonofsomerset1695 10 місяців тому +2

      Then why do you have a BBC bot's username then?

    • @tw8464
      @tw8464 10 місяців тому +1

      Exactly. Like him or not, what the king said is true. The king shouldn't stick his head in the sand and neither should we.

  • @jonnsonsam
    @jonnsonsam 10 місяців тому +3

    Just shows how many lies you can tell while sounding sincere.

  • @Petal4822
    @Petal4822 10 місяців тому +8

    A Klaus Schwab speech.

  • @Juandan59
    @Juandan59 10 місяців тому +4

    In reality climate alarmism is the latest version of Plato's Noble lie, promoted in our generation to protect and extent the privileges of the Davos elite anf elite wannbes. Professor of phiysics ( Emeritus) Princeton University. William Happer.

    • @stevewilcock4767
      @stevewilcock4767 10 місяців тому

      It ties in with the vax,QR codes,Biometrics,Digital ID, Digital Currency and funky Claus.
      Those illuminati boys are rascals aren't they?
      Cheers.

  • @itk2493
    @itk2493 10 місяців тому +5

    Climate change🤣😂 When I was a wee boy it was called seasons.

  • @OldScientist
    @OldScientist 10 місяців тому +4

    Extinction rates (1500-2009) peaked around 1900 at 50 per decade. Extinction rates have declined dramatically to around 4 to per decade in the 2000s. So the extinction rate is very low: 900 known lost species for 2.1 million known species in 500 years (IUCN), so from observations there are an average of slightly less than 2 species lost every year. Out of a known species total of over 2 million. That gives an annual percentage loss of less than 0.0001%. That's background extinction. At that frequency it will take over 930,000 years to reach 80% extinction of species experienced at the K-T boundary that saw the extinction of the dinosaurs. Of course, extinction is a natural part of the evolution of life on this planet with the average lifespan of a species thought to be about 1 million years (cf 930,000). It is estimated that 99.9% of all plant and animal species that have existed have gone extinct. It should also be noted that no families or genera have become extinct in the last 500 years. In fact marine diversity at the taxonomic level of families is the highest it has ever been in the Earth's long history (see Sepkoski Curve). In a review of 16,009 species, most populations (85%) did not show significant trends in abundance, and those that did were balanced between winners (8%) and losers (7%) (Dornelas et al, 2019). There have been only 9 species of continental birds and mammals confirmed extinct since 1500 (Loehle, 2011). No global marine animals have become extinct in the past 50 years (McCauley et, 2015 using IUCN data).
    There is no climate crisis.

    • @daverobinson3758
      @daverobinson3758 10 місяців тому

      How dare you use facts

    • @hgbnkbggj2915
      @hgbnkbggj2915 10 місяців тому +1

      Basing climate problems on extinction rates over hundreds of years is a very inaccurate way of understanding this issue. For one thing, conservation efforts have ramped up considerably in recent times, and so many species are protected from full extinction. This is not to say that huge swathes of the natural world is not is trouble - it is.

    • @OldScientist
      @OldScientist 10 місяців тому

      @hgbnkbggj2915 There are areas of the natural world experiencing difficulties, but these are no due to a global man-made climate crisis, because that does not exist.

    • @OldScientist
      @OldScientist 10 місяців тому

      @@hgbnkbggj2915 Using data from observations would seem to be the best way to understand this issue.

    • @hgbnkbggj2915
      @hgbnkbggj2915 10 місяців тому +1

      @@OldScientist Obviously! But not only from extinctions from the reasona above. It massively misrepresents the issue.

  • @L.LGodwill
    @L.LGodwill 10 місяців тому +5

    Because modern military ammunition has a shelf life ; Not more than nine years; This means that it must be made for a specific task , and it should not be stored randomly ; waiting for an event to happen ?

  • @gavinjames1145
    @gavinjames1145 10 місяців тому +4

    My Carbon Footprint is around 20% of the UK average per capita.
    What is Charlie's personal footprint?
    What is the average Carbon Footprint of those attending COP28?
    IF we really do need to work towards a zero Carbon future, the wealthiest people should first reduce their CO2 contributions to my level!

  • @1caremsa
    @1caremsa 10 місяців тому +5

    King Charles the Third lecturing us commoners on our Carbon Footprint is as absurd as his ancestor Henry the Eighth giving marriage guidance!

    • @public.public
      @public.public 10 місяців тому

      Your lecture is worse than useless.

  • @suegoodwin3599
    @suegoodwin3599 10 місяців тому +5

    To the critics: would you rather he didn't bother and let the world rot? I'm glad he cares enough to bother!

    • @sonofsomerset1695
      @sonofsomerset1695 10 місяців тому

      So you share his arrogance that humans can control an ever changing world climate we dont even fully understand, for an "emegency" based on their models that have already been proven wrong with real world results so far?

    • @tw8464
      @tw8464 10 місяців тому

      You're absolutely right. Most of the "comments" just cutting and pasting the same thing "private jet" or "its cold right now in England" over and over and over. UA-cam allows its "comments" to always be hijacked. Some are real but many are fake and no way that many can have verbatim "commentary." Getting off fossil fuels is a huge and difficult undertaking and it is being made more difficult by those heavily invested in it to no limits at any cost. They may fake "comment" about his private jet which the best propaganda knows how to use something that is partly true to tell a larger and far more insidious Lie of "do nothing" "say nothing" "just let all the countries of the world burn every summer"

  • @sheilagill8385
    @sheilagill8385 10 місяців тому +8

    Losing the support of many of his 'subjects'. Never had a seconds monetary worry or concern about everyday worries of his subjects.He really needs someone to enlighten him about everyone's concerns and worry.(if anyone dare).

    • @SarthorS
      @SarthorS 10 місяців тому

      That's not his job. That's the job of his government. And we were the ones who voted in the people who control it.

    • @douglastodd1947
      @douglastodd1947 10 місяців тому

      @sheilagill8385 i'm still wondering what Deal he had to make with Parliament in order to sit on the Throne.

  • @Jonathan-h1w9j
    @Jonathan-h1w9j 10 місяців тому +3

    Just 96 months to save world, says Prince Charles 2009
    We have 18 months to save world, Prince Charles warns Commonwealth leaders 2019
    Prince Charles: we have 18 months to save human race 2019
    How may years or months does it give it now.?

  • @billscott2457
    @billscott2457 10 місяців тому +17

    1:12 " I pray with all my heart." and worship myself.

  • @paulgibbons2320
    @paulgibbons2320 10 місяців тому +4

    I vote YES to saving the planet.
    I vote NO to green taxation.

    • @SarthorS
      @SarthorS 10 місяців тому

      So you're happy if other people save the planet for you, so long as you don't have to life a finger or change anything about the way you live?

    • @paulgibbons2320
      @paulgibbons2320 10 місяців тому +1

      @@SarthorS That's a cynical way to flip it. You could be even more cynical and question the motives of these involved. It's a meeting exclusive to millionaires and people motivated by money, wealth and property.
      You could come to the conclusion as many have, they are simply motivated by greed and are simply finding creative ways to justify ever increasing taxation.
      Which you certainly can back up looking at their previous patterns of behaviour.
      The rich have benefitted the most by ransacking the earth for resources to sell. The Oil industry particularly.
      Is it not right that they should shoulder a large/larger proportion of the cost of resolving the problem of our damaged environment.
      Why is the solutions these rich people come up with always involve squeezing more cash from those already entrenched in poverty?
      I do personally believe some of the science. Fore sure. But I don't believe green taxes provide an ethical way to resolve it.

    • @paulgibbons2320
      @paulgibbons2320 10 місяців тому

      @@SarthorS The systems in place did not think twice about entering my bank account to ceise money to recover 'Child Support' Debt. (Fictitious I might add)
      I don't understand why they are not equally comfortable raiding the bank accounts of billionaires and millionaires to save the planet.
      Raiding my bank account changed what I eat for my dinner. You go from eating meat and vegetables to tins of beans. If you raided the bank accounts of say Jeff Bessos or Bill Gates.
      It would not change anything at all.
      They are comfortable raiding the banks of people who have nothing.
      But not people who have wealth beyond comparison. It is never a solution which is on the table.
      Its a sociotal double standard.

    • @SarthorS
      @SarthorS 10 місяців тому

      @@paulgibbons2320 I don't necessarily disagree with you, and I'm not being cynical. I just tend to see the flaws or falsehoods in things people say. If they have a good enough answer to the problems I point out, backed by real evidence, then I won't help but agree with them.
      This rarely happens though. I mean, it's the internet. Most people just post the first thing to enter their head, or worthless talking points, without giving it any actual thought. Your reply is, at least, coherent.
      Those with wealth and power have always controlled the world, and even with democracy, it's still true to a great extent. I do agree with you that these sort of people are the ones most responsible for the climate problem. But I also know that your and my opinion are utterly worthless and will have absolutely zero impact on the course of events. But at least we are not turning people against the cause like the Just Stop Oil idiots.

    • @paulgibbons2320
      @paulgibbons2320 10 місяців тому

      @@SarthorS seeing the flaws an falsehoods in what people say is A very good discription of cynicism lol 😂 but I don't consider it a negative discriptor. Don't worry I'm happy for you to be cynical.
      Most people don't have the time or inclination to fully express themselves online.They see it as a waste of time. This probably makes them smarter than people who do waste time on line.
      That's not an indicator that their thoughts on an issue are not well founded. Think more kindly of people.
      The environmentalists of just stop oil are funded by the oil company's and are been used to make a mockery of the issue.
      Don't underestimate what a dirty game that is been played out in the media. The just stop oil protesters have the right message. But dark forces won't let you support it.
      Be kinder to people. 👍

  • @garybell1420
    @garybell1420 10 місяців тому +3

    No wonder his mum never wanted to hand over the crown

  • @LittleFrenchHen
    @LittleFrenchHen 10 місяців тому +4

    Walk back home then, instead of jetting it. Or is that different somehow?

  • @dawndickson564
    @dawndickson564 10 місяців тому +14

    Trust God. Sovereign king of Kings, Lord of Lords 🙏

    • @ajakuk1
      @ajakuk1 10 місяців тому +4

      Why don't you ask God to fix climate change, then?

    • @claimerboy
      @claimerboy 10 місяців тому +1

      God is the climate change force. JUDGEMEnt shall avail no man. Leave the colonized lands of the indigenous and possibly restore normal climate conditions. God granted the land in-deed. That’s what the scriptures say and will fulfill.

    • @dawndickson564
      @dawndickson564 10 місяців тому +4

      ​@ajakuk1 Repent the kingdom of God is at Hand. Jesus is Coming 🙏

    • @winstoningram99
      @winstoningram99 10 місяців тому

      ​@@dawndickson564yay. A Christian nutter

    • @nanabuster7285
      @nanabuster7285 10 місяців тому

      @@ajakuk1The sun drives the weather. It’s science.

  • @hgbnkbggj2915
    @hgbnkbggj2915 10 місяців тому +4

    He's not wrong, BUT, Charles should be the last person to attend to educate others on science. As an advocate for homeopathy, he has no scientific integrity whatsoever.

  • @koreboredom4302
    @koreboredom4302 10 місяців тому +2

    *walks up to podium*
    "CLIMATE CHANGE BAD!... Phew welp, I'm done for the day, y'all sort yourselves out now, k?"

  • @lurvactually
    @lurvactually 10 місяців тому +9

    How did you get there king charles? Private jet by chance??

    • @slider-arkofwar463
      @slider-arkofwar463 10 місяців тому

      What did you expect? A bus?

    • @KuchiKopi179
      @KuchiKopi179 10 місяців тому

      ​@@slider-arkofwar463first class is for the plebs.

    • @sonofsomerset1695
      @sonofsomerset1695 10 місяців тому

      @@slider-arkofwar463 Ever heard of the internet, you know, the thing you just used?

  • @DnBclassictunes
    @DnBclassictunes 10 місяців тому +1

    Says the richest person in Britain with the biggest houses. Absolute hypocrisy

  • @jamesfrearson9630
    @jamesfrearson9630 10 місяців тому +5

    The King has said well.

    • @YG-rr6zv
      @YG-rr6zv 10 місяців тому

      @jamesfrearson9630 - Who is also unaware that he has a carbon footprint bigger than most people by coming to this conference on a flipping PRIVATE JET. But hey, if you’re part of a once imperial, land-grabbing colonialist monarchy that gives us working and middle class the illusion that they’re good but don’t pay tax, have NO idea what it’s like to pay rent or work a normal job to get by..

  • @moleyrusselswart
    @moleyrusselswart 10 місяців тому +4

    The biggest hypocrite

  • @qunngiaqti
    @qunngiaqti 10 місяців тому +5

    Just think if this man campaigned for honest labeling on foods we could all choose if we wish to buy meat raised in Britain or failing that the nearest suppliers to save on transportation pollution. If we are not given this information how can we shop responsibly. Also how about campaigning for ready meals containing products such as mash potatoes and preformed chips which have had the potato starch removed for its usefulness in forming other meat products to make those apparently oh so nice so called deli slice thinner than a piece of paper. Start there Mr. Windsor with honest food labelling. Stop the rise in Value extended products especially those which contain cellulose/added gluten/potato starch etc.
    Make children's menus in restaurants etc. contain real foods and not low grade mechanically recovered products. Children deserve a better start in life than this chemically and mechanically manipulated food.
    Cleaning emissions and making use of wool and other natural fibres would be a better use of money. Plastic clothing is cheap but it sure ain't healthy.
    The planet is not at risk, it will be here long after it gets rid of us as a scourge, it is us at risk and the science community have destroyed the food chain right round the world. The science community needs to be reigned in and made to work on improving our food production methods and not for the profits of Big Pharma.
    And for goodness sake Mr. Windsor a Zero Carbon future would be the death of us all as the planet would not be able to support life.

    • @Twotierk
      @Twotierk 10 місяців тому +3

      Brilliant totally agree 👍

    • @shawroberts5149
      @shawroberts5149 10 місяців тому

      Why not send your comments to The Rt Hon Mark Spencer MP, the Minister of State (Minister for Food, Farming and Fisheries)?
      Your sentiments are (generally) admirable, but you are lambasting the wrong man!
      Wishing you well with your own personal efforts to save the planet - litterpicking, recycling, upcycling, thrift shop donations, horticulture, fuel limitation, beach clean ups, hazardous chemical control, supporting local shops and reaping natures harvest etc...
      We ALL have a part to play.

    • @qunngiaqti
      @qunngiaqti 10 місяців тому

      I totally agree we should all do our part, But of course we all like to talk about, it but none like to actually check out these things for themselves and then act accordingly. One visit to my local authority land infill/re-cycling plant on their open day was very informative not for what was said but more for what was not said, the actual layout and signs used for vehicles appeared to have their own story to tell. It was a very interesting couple of hours well spent.
      I find it interesting that you think that complaining to the Min of Ag would be correct, or an effect way to go to try and get waste products getting in preformed and mechanically recovered foods removed. This is the dept which is actively promoting the use of extended value products in general and the modern more they tell you labelling the more vague is the actual labelling of food. That wonderful use of cellulose in foods, which due to the properties of dehydration is always listed on the labelling at its dry weight and appears to be only a small part of the contents, where as once you rehydrate it to its normal moist state it is the no 1 ingredient. Needless to say they never state what the cellulose or it's origins are.
      It is the min of ag that supervises and allows the majority of imported meat to be sold under the false labeling of British meat. Encourages fish farming which is one of the most horrendous industries ever invented.
      All this and more to avoid farming in a sustainable way in keeping with nature, We build cars but do not include air cleaning filters in the design of the cars to clean the air as the car is being driven. Why would we after all we buy cars for speed and looks and not the ability to clean up the air they are polluting.
      We know we need to clean up after ourselves but currently it is the same people who are responsible for the dirty air who also control the use and applications of the laws.
      So who does that leave? Who is above such matters and can be considered anything like neutral enough to have a real impact on modern day pollution rackets and believe you me much of it is a racket with lots of grants and others monies available to those who wish to manipulate the system.
      Throwing money at these industries will not solve the problems of pollution. It is a moral issue and can only start to get somewhere when we start to consider it a moral problem. Companies which used public water need to be obligated to return clean water back into the system after they have cleaned it up. A pulp mill which does not clean up the water it uses is just abusing lax laws which allow it to just pour it waste into the waterways and left to the tax payer to pay the costs of a cleanup after a disaster or whatever which is about the only time clean ups really seem to happen.
      Meanwhile the increase in polluted foods is ever growing and humans from the poorer communities pay the price, the rise in coeliac disease which is almost at plague levels, auto immune diseases and other areas which are very very related to the modern food productions methods. In effect we are using poor people and the undereducated who are easy to influence through advertising as recycling plants. The lungs of pedestrians which currently are the only ongoing air cleaning filters of the the air in many major towns and cities.
      There is more to the pollution problems than plastic and fossil fuels - first we need to work out what pollution is - And I ain't never seen a good all encompassing definition of what constitutes modern day pollution. Until we can work out the difference between pollution and by products we are on a none starter,
      .
      @@shawroberts5149

  • @dianesaenger9412
    @dianesaenger9412 10 місяців тому +1

    The majority of Canada's wild fires were human caused no by nature. The carbon has been regreening the planet, plants thrive with increased cabon and in turn they give back oxygen.

  • @alancooper3331
    @alancooper3331 10 місяців тому +6

    He probably ads more to climate change in one day then I do in a year,but it’s all my fault and everyone the same as me.

    • @michaelshaw9029
      @michaelshaw9029 10 місяців тому

      Exactly, I'm done feeling guilty about the planet. While the elites all fly about in private jets.

  • @Barbarian75
    @Barbarian75 10 місяців тому +1

    He flew on his private jet putting tons of CO2 in the air just to say that? Hypocrite.

  • @poolplayerpoolplayer7430
    @poolplayerpoolplayer7430 10 місяців тому +5

    I thought the king or queen were supposed to stay out of politics?!

    • @shawroberts5149
      @shawroberts5149 10 місяців тому +1

      He is a, 'Green Pioneer', he is not a 'Green Politician'...

    • @poolplayerpoolplayer7430
      @poolplayerpoolplayer7430 10 місяців тому

      @@shawroberts5149 green propagandist more like

  • @leroyrodgers6089
    @leroyrodgers6089 10 місяців тому +1

    If these people really cared about climate change, they would be investing heavily in Tesla. Instead, Bill Gates shorted Tesla....

  • @TruthAlwaysWins786
    @TruthAlwaysWins786 10 місяців тому +2

    Literally a GENOCIDE happening and the guy is still banging on about the climate

    • @Witchfinder.General
      @Witchfinder.General 10 місяців тому

      Only in your brainwashed mind

    • @daddymulk
      @daddymulk 10 місяців тому

      ​@@Witchfinder.General BBC watcher 😂😂

  • @neilburns8869
    @neilburns8869 10 місяців тому +2

    I just hope that we see some kind of real action because I have witnessed precious little being done in the UK over the last 12 months.

  • @simmysimmy3748
    @simmysimmy3748 10 місяців тому +2

    Sorry Charlie you're not our spokeperson..

  • @leighaston1
    @leighaston1 10 місяців тому +2

    zzzzzzzzzzzz ..... the usual suspects flying there in their private jets to preach to others about carbon emmissions .... what a load of BS ....

    • @moirascott2963
      @moirascott2963 10 місяців тому

      What did they have for dinner? Was it ze bugs? - no - I thought not

  • @bengun1
    @bengun1 10 місяців тому +5

    I'm taking no lectures from the most privileged people on the planet......