Fighter Kills In Europe Gun Camera Footage 1944

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 жов 2020
  • Stock Footage Link:
    www.buyoutfootage.com/pages/t...
    GSAP camera footage of German Luftwaffe planes shot down by 3rd and 8th Army Air Force pilots in WWII, late 1944 and close air support for British Troops in Burma 1945. Strafing of ground targets.
    Allied gun sight aiming point (G.S.A.P) camera footage. German plane in a spiral after being hit. Transport is hit and explodes in ball of fire. American P-38 flashes across sky. Nazi plane is hit and crashes in a fireball. Messerschmitt ME-163 Jet is shot down and crashes. Low level strafing attacks on ground targets, freight trains, trucks and vehicles on bridge, a sea plane, storage facility erupts into large fireball.
    Several scenes of Messerschmitt ME-262 Jet Fighter-Bomber and Messerschmitt ME-163 Jet Fighter as audio describes each plane. 8th Army Air Force pilots strafing attacks on various ground targets. Aerial dogfight footage. Shows attacks on Focke-Wulf Fw-190 and Messerschmitt ME-109. German Luftwaffe pilot bails out of Focke-Wulf Fw-190. Focke-Wulf Fw-190 explodes after being hit.
    Nyaunga, Burma, S E Asia: 02/1945. P-47 planes strafe and dive-bomb enemy positions and provide close air support for attacking British Troops. GSAP camera footage strafing enemy anti-aircraft gun positions, refineries, oil storage tanks. Strafing of buildings and other ground targets near Meiktila Burma and supply lines at Cheuk.
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 167

  • @manuelperales8217
    @manuelperales8217 2 роки тому +14

    It is striking to note how often in these gun-cameras the German pilots, due to inexperience in these last months of the war, or because of the nervous tension of being attacked, forgot to release their extra tanks.

    • @marchansel7296
      @marchansel7296 2 роки тому +2

      Very inexperienced the Luftwaffe piots were so badly trained ,They could barely take off and land,,Exactly like russians in 1941-42.Very easy kills.

    • @manuelperales8217
      @manuelperales8217 2 роки тому +1

      @@marchansel7296 That's true.

    • @marchansel7296
      @marchansel7296 2 роки тому +2

      @@manuelperales8217 . Absolutely Manuel .And I'm quite surprised how many top Luftwaffe aces survived the war against overwhelming odds..1943-45.Things looked very bad for them..They must definetly be the most experienced pilots of ww2.Although I know alot where killed in action which against these overwhelming odds is no surprise.

    • @samuelgordino
      @samuelgordino Рік тому

      They were ordered to not drop the tanks because of the aluminum shortage. Dumb order but not worse from Luftwaffe comand.

    • @clownbaby7985
      @clownbaby7985 Рік тому

      @@marchansel7296 anyone else find it disturbing that the American pilots were strafing downed planes that likely had passed out pilots in them?

  • @carrisasteveinnes1596
    @carrisasteveinnes1596 2 роки тому +15

    Never seen this footage before. There must be so much more out there not yet recovered and restored.

  • @growlers90
    @growlers90 2 роки тому +12

    Why the watermark centre screen ? Ruins vid.

  • @brentmoody3461
    @brentmoody3461 2 роки тому +4

    This whole reel I have seen several times by different providers. Almost all of these films have been shown by half a dozen different providers. Some put a watermark on them and others copy from one channel and then put it on their own. It is hard anymore to tell who had the original. Anyway I don't get too tired of re seeing them anyway. Thanks

  • @johnp9402
    @johnp9402 2 роки тому +5

    I like it but I need more gunfire sound. I got a fever. And the only remedy is gunfire sounds

  • @hockmanmc
    @hockmanmc 2 роки тому +9

    Y'all have to remember, a lot of these films were shown to the troops as well as the public to boost morale and so on.
    Harder to do that with a silent picture so it stands to reason that they'd "hype it up" a bit with sound effects and so on.
    Call it poetic/dramatic license if you will.

    • @danielburgess7785
      @danielburgess7785 2 роки тому +3

      I call it propaganda.

    • @michaeldover
      @michaeldover 2 роки тому

      I call it poetic justice :)

    • @KokoroKatsura
      @KokoroKatsura 2 роки тому +1

      @@danielburgess7785 if you don't like things you call it propagandas

    • @danielburgess7785
      @danielburgess7785 2 роки тому +1

      @@KokoroKatsura No, I'm just honest. Propaganda even for the "Good Guys," is still propaganda.
      Propaganda: the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person

    • @brettbaxter7882
      @brettbaxter7882 Рік тому

      @@danielburgess7785 Advertising was known as propaganda until after WW2, when propaganda developed a negative connotation.

  • @PenDragonsPig
    @PenDragonsPig 2 роки тому +18

    Looks like someone was claiming they shot down a DH Mosquito.

    • @hondacxrider
      @hondacxrider 2 роки тому +2

      At 1.17, I thought that, looks definitely like a mosquito to me.

    • @raymond7880
      @raymond7880 2 роки тому +3

      Agree. That was a DH Mossie. Distinctive fin and nacelles.

    • @BrianWMay
      @BrianWMay 2 роки тому +2

      @@raymond7880 The canopy was also very distinct. Yep, a Mosquito.

    • @gregorteply9034
      @gregorteply9034 2 роки тому

      Good shootink xD

  • @surgemeister01
    @surgemeister01 Рік тому +2

    Sure wish I could see past the "Buyout Footage. I mean seriously, you couldn't put it at the bottom?

    • @BuyoutFootage
      @BuyoutFootage  Рік тому +1

      Yes, we're in he process of revising all of our preview videos.

  • @franciscook5819
    @franciscook5819 2 роки тому +13

    At about 1:16 the aircraft being attacked looks like a DeHavilland Mosquito (forward positioned fin and rudder; slim, tapered nacelles with V protruding from the rear; low, flat cockpit). Anyone know anything more about this? The Germans did capture and use some Mosquitos but, absent seeing the markings, it would be reasonable to assume it was a British aircraft.

    • @SuperEdge67
      @SuperEdge67 2 роки тому +2

      Yep, looks like a Mossie to me. Mind you the Americans were notoriously bad at identifying friend or foe. Clostermann talks about it in his book The Big Show. It got to the point where the RAF were reluctant to escort US bombers.

    • @soppdrake
      @soppdrake 2 роки тому

      Blue on blue 😶

    • @ww2hungary827
      @ww2hungary827 2 роки тому

      Blue on Blue

    • @manuelperales8217
      @manuelperales8217 2 роки тому +1

      You're right. it was a Mosquito, and Clostermann recounted in an interview how his squadmate Jacques Remlinger, when landing after a mission, jumped over the wing of a P-47 whose pilot had just shot down a colleague, Michel Boudier, by mistake, and they had to restrain him so that he wouldn't hit him. Confusing a Spitfire with an Me-109 seen from behind was not uncommon if the characteristics of each aircraft model were not carefully studied. M. Boudier managed to parachute but seriously injured and had to undergo harsh interrogations by the Gestapo before being sent to a prisoner of war camp. American anti-aircraft gunners were also nicknamed "Happy trigger" with a tendency to shoot first and check later, which cost the life of great P-51 Mustang ace George Preddy.

    • @agdgdgwngo
      @agdgdgwngo Рік тому

      Looks like a Mossie to me, though it is very similar in appearance to a Ju 88 too. The engine nacceles are the give away

  • @superscotty1829
    @superscotty1829 2 роки тому +4

    What would make this video amazing would be some machine gun sounds on every clip.

    • @Bob-vc6ug
      @Bob-vc6ug 2 роки тому +4

      And make them all sound exactly the same.

    • @davidh6300
      @davidh6300 2 роки тому +3

      And the fake screeching of dive flaps.

    • @rob379lqz
      @rob379lqz 2 роки тому +1

      I stopped counting the machine gun bullets after 12728.

  • @Treasuremonk
    @Treasuremonk Рік тому +1

    It would of been so much better with out the damn “buyout footage” in the middle of the screen!

  • @markjones7185
    @markjones7185 Рік тому

    The early scene with a P-38 passing, that looks like a P-47 being shot up.

  • @microsoft790
    @microsoft790 2 роки тому +1

    the exploding train, wow

  • @rapturereadyyt
    @rapturereadyyt 2 роки тому +3

    I didn't know Burma and Japan were European countries.

  • @chrisharris4740
    @chrisharris4740 2 роки тому +4

    Watermark. Did you have to?

  • @tdm5100
    @tdm5100 Рік тому +1

    Americans shooting at everything airborne, even at British Mosquitos(1:15) 😂

  • @KazutoBlogch
    @KazutoBlogch 2 роки тому +21

    Thy said: "Gunsight aiming point cameras record a german jet propelled aircraft in COMBAT"
    But actually the Me262 was returning to base with the rails down, trying to land.
    The same for the other images.
    On the Me163 as it is known that it was with an empty tank, it was simply hovering in the air.
    Since these monstrosities could reach 850 km/h without straining, thanks to the powerful rocket that it carried behind itself, which ignited was surprising.
    Too bad they can only be in the air for less than 10 minutes because of the amount of fuel they could carry.
    More than 70% of Me262 / Me163 or whatever with rocket / jet technology were shot down during takeoff / landing or due to mechanical failures or because they were simply 200 or more p51 / 47 against 10 or less German aircraft.

    • @ryanyoung8245
      @ryanyoung8245 2 роки тому +3

      Look at it again, the 262 was behind a P-47 at altitude in part of the footage

    • @KazutoBlogch
      @KazutoBlogch 2 роки тому +1

      @@ryanyoung8245 Nahh on 2:17,
      the first seconds were from a landing. what you mention happens seconds later with another Me262 It's like 5 different fight shots in 15 seconds.
      almost all are lopsided fights.
      It was impossible for 600km/h allied propeller plane to approach a Me262 or Me 163 with 800-950km/h " like 2:51 shots (far far away).
      On 3:27 those Me 163 on this video, they was literally gliding. If the rocket was actually working they were expelling a lot of smoke.
      Like this video:
      ua-cam.com/video/aAAeVCHKveo/v-deo.html
      On this video we can see how a Me163 can reach 1000m of altituted on literally seconds

    • @nigelmitchell351
      @nigelmitchell351 2 роки тому +3

      The 262 pilot had to contend with the Jumo engine which had very poor throttle response. It was also prone to stall at the best of times particularly if the throttle was used insensitivity, let alone in combat manoeuvres.
      Eric Brown said of the 262, one of the most exceptional aeroplanes of WW2. But he didn't have to fly it in a combat situation.
      Engine life was reckoned by Adolf Galland to be as little as 12 hours.
      Problems with metallurgy not only effected the jets but had a severe effect on the engines of the 109 & 190.

    • @Zogerpogger
      @Zogerpogger 2 роки тому +2

      @@nigelmitchell351 And then don't even get started on the me-163, pure death drap of an aircraft

    • @nigelmitchell351
      @nigelmitchell351 2 роки тому

      @@Zogerpogger How to put an extra element of danger into an already rather dangerous occupation.!

  • @KAKU560
    @KAKU560 2 роки тому +5

    No MIC on Gun Camera. OK?

  • @zacharyfielder7260
    @zacharyfielder7260 Рік тому

    I've never seen an Axis flying boat like the one getting strafed from 2:05 - 2:10. Looks like a BV222 with a twin tail?

  • @at1970
    @at1970 2 роки тому +4

    Hard to believe they didn’t know it was all over as the skies were full of allied planes.

  • @stewartross1233
    @stewartross1233 2 роки тому +40

    I think we could give the machine guns sounds a rest, God Almighty!!!! I love how the shooting fighters have endless bullets to expend!

    • @oscargrouch7962
      @oscargrouch7962 2 роки тому +6

      Indeed! Gun cameras did not have microphones to record the gunshots.

    • @snake57
      @snake57 2 роки тому +3

      The machine gun sounds were ridiculous.

    • @bonidle726
      @bonidle726 2 роки тому +3

      While I agree with you, we have to remember that this was for home audiences in cinemas for morale purposes. While we as aviation history enthusiasts might have no problem watching these as they should be, silent, the average audiences would get a bit disinterested.

    • @Litvagopnik
      @Litvagopnik 2 роки тому +3

      US fighters carried up to 2000rds of .50 and .30 ammo. The US's thought was the .50 was better than 20mm cannons because it can produce more fire density, and same variety of ammo belts.

    • @thomasriggle6371
      @thomasriggle6371 2 роки тому +1

      I think you need to remember moron that this is multiple plans with sound affects. Think about how stupid you're comment is.

  • @BimmieJames
    @BimmieJames Рік тому +4

    I love how they describe the Me 163 (a rocket aircraft) as a jet; then describe the me 262 (a jet aircraft) as “like a rocket”.

  • @marcoangelucci5220
    @marcoangelucci5220 Рік тому

    never seen before, very intersting

  • @randybrown9706
    @randybrown9706 2 роки тому

    Just think you can hear two of eight

  • @helmutschmacher2100
    @helmutschmacher2100 Рік тому

    That 1 sound clip repeated over and over and over plus the poxy watermark gets a thumb down and blocked for misleading.

  • @RasskazSoldata
    @RasskazSoldata 2 роки тому

    nice)

  • @standupstraight9691
    @standupstraight9691 2 роки тому +3

    i bet those machine guns are an old teletype machine.

  • @lu77xiaojun37
    @lu77xiaojun37 2 роки тому

    Em German's coulda used a lesson or two on landing. Dang.

  • @bladerj
    @bladerj 2 роки тому +1

    considering that the cam was only triggered by the guns, the pilot was clearly aiming for the parachuter. Also americans were known for waiting the planes to take off or land and get them while they are vulnerable.....the german considered this a cheap tatic and dishonorable, as there would be no time for the pilots to eject.

    • @Bob-vc6ug
      @Bob-vc6ug 2 роки тому

      A lot of aircraft had cameras that would come on once the guns were armed.

    • @robertwilson9826
      @robertwilson9826 2 роки тому

      All is fair in .........

    • @TheRaulr151
      @TheRaulr151 2 роки тому

      May have fired to clearly miss but have the camera catch the chute in the image to confirm the kill

    • @bladerj
      @bladerj 2 роки тому

      @@TheRaulr151 bullshit, it is confirmed allied (US) pilots did this especially in the end of the war when they had air superiority. japaneses pilots did this as well.

    • @redbay8527
      @redbay8527 Рік тому +1

      @@bladerj German pilots did it as well. I think it's pretty well confirmed that all countries had pilots that did this, so why single out the Americans? And TheRaulr151 is absolutely correct - American pilots DID use the camera to verify that the plane was shot down AND the pilot ejected safely. If in friendly territory, it would justify a search for the enemy pilot.

  • @thehobgoblin9790
    @thehobgoblin9790 2 роки тому +1

    1:10 to 1:17. Takes some explaining. that's a Mosquito.

  • @Bernd109
    @Bernd109 Рік тому

    @1:18 .... isn´t that a DH Mosquito?

  • @kapitolina2540
    @kapitolina2540 2 роки тому +2

    Luftpiraten in Aktion ☠

  • @degrees7097
    @degrees7097 2 роки тому +2

    2:44 that 262 be like: reeeeee!

  • @steeeeve8676
    @steeeeve8676 Рік тому

    You can tell the footage is American, they were the only dirty fighters on the allied side who shot pilots on the parachute.

  • @jericchua8
    @jericchua8 2 роки тому

    1:16 looks almost like a Mosquito. What is it?

  • @charliecharliecharliecharl8554

    262 in a flat spin I'd rather have a p 51

  • @fatdad64able
    @fatdad64able 2 роки тому +1

    1:12 What is this??? A Me410? A Fw 187? Not by 1944 though,....perhaps a Ta154?

    • @Dalesmanable
      @Dalesmanable 2 роки тому +5

      A British Mosquito.

    • @Timnaldo
      @Timnaldo 2 роки тому

      Yeah. Looks like a Mossie, But Im also curious about that.

    • @gibson617ajg
      @gibson617ajg 2 роки тому +1

      @@Dalesmanable I don't think it has Merlin engines.

  • @scottjohnson9225
    @scottjohnson9225 2 роки тому

    Save your rounds. You got him. Go after more.

  • @McD4VE
    @McD4VE 2 роки тому

    IL-2?

  • @bonidle726
    @bonidle726 2 роки тому +1

    1 minute 16 secs shows an RAF Mosquito. It was attacked by American P-51’s whose pilots aircraft recognition left a lot to be desired. They continued the attack and shot it down.

    • @samiam619
      @samiam619 2 роки тому +2

      Flying too slow to be a Mosquito.

    • @bonidle726
      @bonidle726 2 роки тому

      @@samiam619 Don’t expect high marks for aircraft recognition, that is unquestionably a Mossie. Shape of the tail, rear of the nacelles, cockpit shape, observer bubble.....it’s a Mossie and it was shot down by friendly fire. You aren’t a Mustang pilot are you?

    • @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935
      @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 2 роки тому

      How do you have even the slightest clue about how fast it was going?

  • @ss-oq9pc
    @ss-oq9pc 2 роки тому +1

    6:11 I don't know which is worse. The shooters aim or the germans flying.

    • @skipintroux4440
      @skipintroux4440 2 роки тому +1

      To be fair by this point in the war many were probably inexperienced 18 year old boys.

    • @Dujass
      @Dujass 2 роки тому

      Both lmao

  • @dachsundking
    @dachsundking Місяць тому

    loose the logo in the middle of the picture!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @user-zk1lk9ep5e
    @user-zk1lk9ep5e 2 роки тому

    M2ブローニングは独軍にとっては恐怖の的だったでしょうな。

  • @kingquad6677
    @kingquad6677 2 роки тому +2

    I wish I had some of these memories!.... I did nothing with my life compared to this?

  • @andrewmountford3608
    @andrewmountford3608 2 роки тому

    And one Mosquito…..

  • @braydenpepper7630
    @braydenpepper7630 2 роки тому +3

    Not trying to be a nerd but under the geneva convention it states that if a air combatant has landed you are not permitted to straf or do any more harm to the aircraft they have made it clear that they are not combat capable. It doesn't matter if this pilot has killed 100 other American fighters but it is the global law. Breaking this law of war is punishable by death. Just wanted to point that out

    • @cammypanties
      @cammypanties 2 роки тому +3

      the geneva convention also said "no genocide" moron, stop with ur cringe call to honor for the nazis u massive loser

    • @waltersobchak3903
      @waltersobchak3903 2 роки тому +2

      Fuck em

    • @utkarshtrivedi8870
      @utkarshtrivedi8870 2 роки тому

      @@cammypanties still couldn't justify the American brutality. This implies, if Nazis were monsters so were the Americans.

    • @Poetry4Peace
      @Poetry4Peace Рік тому

      didnt know that also cant see the 3 replies wtff someone reply so i can seee

    • @brettbaxter7882
      @brettbaxter7882 Рік тому

      The Geneva Conventions of 1949, convened 4 years after the war ended.

  • @sieglindewebb
    @sieglindewebb Рік тому

    Krank🤦‍♂️

  • @TheFunkhouser
    @TheFunkhouser 2 роки тому +1

    The do realise shooting up those box-cars could be killing allied POW's right?

    • @agdgdgwngo
      @agdgdgwngo Рік тому

      Hah at 1:16 they're blasting up a friendly aircraft

  • @franzbranntwein3722
    @franzbranntwein3722 2 роки тому +2

    Anfänger Piloten abzuschießen ist keine Kunst! Gegen Veteranen hätten die Ami Piloten keine Chance

    • @samsalemi9769
      @samsalemi9769 2 роки тому +2

      The Americans and British shot down all the veterans that’s why the Germans had to use in experienced pilots at the end of the war

    • @gibson617ajg
      @gibson617ajg 2 роки тому +1

      What are they supposed to do before attacking an enemy aircraft? Call him on the radio and ask how many hours he has on the type? 😂
      Whether he has 1 or 50 he knows where the trigger is.

    • @utkarshtrivedi8870
      @utkarshtrivedi8870 2 роки тому

      @@gibson617ajg lol I just love how Eric Hartmann singlehandedly butchered 352 allied planes 😄 😆 😍

  • @rmurphy3435
    @rmurphy3435 Рік тому +1

    Stop with these watermarks, cheap.

  • @davidh6300
    @davidh6300 2 роки тому

    8:53 RIP left wing.

  • @oO-_-_-_-Oo
    @oO-_-_-_-Oo 10 місяців тому

    wonder how many goofed fatally and ate dirt

  • @garrisonnichols807
    @garrisonnichols807 Рік тому

    Damn the British and American air forces were fucking shit up! Nice😊

  • @hansmuller7122
    @hansmuller7122 2 роки тому +2

    ua-cam.com/video/7GwozFSW8MU/v-deo.html
    Die ist viel besser ))))

  • @cochrane4599
    @cochrane4599 2 роки тому +5

    Oops.....American shooting down a British Mosquito at 1:16.

    • @samburkes7552
      @samburkes7552 2 роки тому

      Yeah, in quick aerial combat, those DeHav. Mosquitoes resemble twin-engined Messerschmitts!! Markings should be deciding factor bef. pulling the trigger. Prob hard to discern with the rapidity of the situation..

  • @beadelaresma6705
    @beadelaresma6705 Рік тому

    One on one battle america and german ...america never WIN

  • @schlesischerpatriot9634
    @schlesischerpatriot9634 2 роки тому

    Auf einen sich nicht wehrenden Feind wie ein Irrer draufzuballern zeugt von hohen soldatischem Können und außerordentlicher Tapferkeit 🤣

    • @jackcurtis3594
      @jackcurtis3594 2 роки тому

      I assure you these pilots spent a lot of time being shot at too.

    • @Nero-dz5gr
      @Nero-dz5gr 2 роки тому +1

      Wenn du die aufnahmen meinst in denen stehende oder rollende/landende flieger beschossen werden kann ich versichern dass es sich um Kriegsverbrechen handelt ...es ist verboten auf notlandende flieger zu schießen.

    • @schlesischerpatriot9634
      @schlesischerpatriot9634 2 роки тому

      @@Nero-dz5gr Genau diese Aufnahmen meine ich. Oha, solche ,,Heldentaten" gelten sogar als Kriegsverbrechen?! Das wußte ich nicht, hätte ich mir aber eigentlich denken können. . Danke für die Info, @Nero!

    • @Nero-dz5gr
      @Nero-dz5gr 2 роки тому

      @@schlesischerpatriot9634 Kein Thema
      Nenn sich "Fliegermorde"

  • @AbdullahZaber
    @AbdullahZaber 2 роки тому

    The propaganda voice dude.

  • @Rob-pu1mg
    @Rob-pu1mg 2 роки тому +3

    that american pilot shot a crashlanded fighterplane ???..... seems that this pilot knew nothing about honor

    • @brianbruce8398
      @brianbruce8398 2 роки тому +2

      You think that the German pilots cut slack to the much slower bombers that they shot down. Unless the pilot was floating down in a chute, they were fair game.

    • @Rob-pu1mg
      @Rob-pu1mg 2 роки тому +1

      @@brianbruce8398 of course they shot down much slower bombers because these bombers bombed their cities but the most german pilots followed the code of honor which was formed in ww1 and a chrashlanded fighter was no thread for anyone ....sry for my bad english but i hope you understand what i want to tell you

    • @michaeldover
      @michaeldover 2 роки тому

      Tell that to the many millions of slaughtered Jews and others.....all in the name of German mastery of Europe via the cleansing of other ethnicities, etc.
      The German military and government (all of them....they were all complicit) lost any right to be treated with honor in 1933....and still to this day do not deserve any until the last German alive from the war is dead and gone.

    • @Rob-pu1mg
      @Rob-pu1mg 2 роки тому

      @@michaeldover ohh boy :DDDD

    • @Rob-pu1mg
      @Rob-pu1mg 2 роки тому +2

      @@michaeldover most of the german soldiers fought because they had to.They fought to survive like french,polish, russian etc. they followed orders because if they did not they wouldnt face the judge they faced the end of a gunbarrel. both of my grandfathers fought in a war that they never wanted to fight. you should overthink your stupid opinion ...

  • @gazbomber4700
    @gazbomber4700 2 роки тому +2

    Just casual war crimes shooting landing aircraft all cool

    • @Rehunauris
      @Rehunauris Рік тому

      It's not a war crime to shoot down a landing military aircraft.